Wholeissue 48 3
Wholeissue 48 3
March/mars 2022
Crux Mathematicorum is a problem-solving journal at the secondary and university undergraduate levels,
published online by the Canadian Mathematical Society. Its aim is primarily educational; it is not a research
journal. Online submission:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
Crux Mathematicorum est une publication de résolution de problèmes de niveau secondaire et de premier
cycle universitaire publiée par la Société mathématique du Canada. Principalement de nature éducative,
le Crux n’est pas une revue scientifique. Soumission en ligne:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
The Canadian Mathematical Society grants permission to individual readers of this publication to copy articles for
their own personal use.
c CANADIAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2022. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ISSN 1496-4309 (Online)
La Société mathématique du Canada permet aux lecteurs de reproduire des articles de la présente publication à des
fins personnelles uniquement.
Editorial Board
118 In Memoriam
119 MathemAttic Article Contest winners announcement
120 MathemAttic: No. 33
121 Problems: MA161–MA165
123 Solutions: MA136–MA140
128 Problem Solving Vignettes: No. 21 Shawn Godin
133 From the bookshelf of ... Asia Matthews
135 From the lecture notes of ... Fok-Shuen Leung
138 Olympiad Corner: No. 401
138 Problems: OC571–OC575
141 Solutions: OC546–OC550
146 Focus On . . . : No. 50 Michel Bataille
152 Problems: 4721–4730
156 Bonus Problems: B101–B125
160 Solutions: 4671–4680
Crux Mathematicorum
Founding Editors / Rédacteurs-fondateurs: Léopold Sauvé & Frederick G.B. Maskell
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer,
Shawn Godin
Crux Mathematicorum
with Mathematical Mayhem
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Václav Linek,
Shawn Godin
118/ In Memoriam
In Memoriam
Yulia Zdanovskaya, a 21-year old mathematician, was killed on March 8th, 2022
during a Russian forces attack on Kharkiv, Ukraine.
In 2017, Yulia represented Ukraine at the European Girls’ Mathematical Olympiad
and won a silver medal at the competition. Currently, Yulia was a student in
computer mathematics program at the Kiev National University. Passionate about
math, computer science and teaching, she recently joined Teach for Ukraine to
become a mentor and a role model for new generations of young people. Yulia was
from Kharkiv and refused to leave her hometown; the last message she sent was
“Thanks, but I will stay in Kharkiv until our victory”.
MATHEMATTIC
No. 33
The problems featured in this section are intended for students at the secondary school
level.
MA163. In the diagram, the log A has radius R. A hole of radius r is drilled
through the centre of log A at right angles to the axis. Another log B of radius r
passes through the hole. Find the length S in terms of R and r.
.................................................................
Les problèmes dans cette section sont appropriés aux étudiants de l’école secondaire.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 juin 2022.
MATHEMATTIC
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(8), p. 372–373.
whence
2Sm+1 = S2m+1 .
This leads to
m
X 2m
X
2 (a + k)2 = (a + k)2
k=0 k=0
a2 − (2m2 )a − m2 (2m + 1) = 0
whose roots are a = −m, 2m2 + m. Clearly for a = −m, Ω2m+1 contains negative
integers. So a 6= −m and we must have a = 2m2 + m. Thus
for each m ≥ 1.
MA137. Triangle ABC has area 1. X, Y are points on the side AB and Z
a point on the side AC such that XY = 2AX, XZ is parallel to Y C and Y Z is
parallel to BC. Determine the area of triangle XY Z.
Originally from the 2010 Alberta High School Mathematics Competition, Part I,
problem 15.
There were 7 solutions submitted, of which 6 were correct. We presents the solution
by Doddy Kastanya.
Z
Y
C
B
Since
AY AZ AX 1
= = = ,
AB AC AY 3
then
[XY Z] = 32 [AY Z] = ( 32 )( 19 )[ABC] = 2
27 .
csc 6◦ + csc 78◦ − csc 42◦ − csc 66◦ = (csc 6◦ − csc 66◦ ) − (csc 78◦ − csc 42◦ )
sin 66◦ − sin 6◦ sin 78◦ − sin 42◦
= ◦ ◦
− .
sin 6 sin 66 sin 42◦ sin 78◦
MA139. The shape below was created by pasting together 25 unit squares.
When a similar shape is created with n squares, its perimeter is 100 units. Deter-
mine n.
Originally from the 2014-2015 Nova Scotia Math League, Game 1, Team question
2.
We received 6 solutions, of which 4 were correct. We present the solution by
Corneliu Manescu-Avram.
Let p be the perimeter of the shape containing n squares. We shall prove that
p = 2n + 2. We call a square interior if it does not contain sides on the perimeter.
(p + 8) − 2(n + 4) = p − 2n,
p − 2n = 12 − 2 · 5 = 2.
MA140.
If f (x) = 1 − x − x3 , what are all real values of x which satisfy
3
1 − f (x) − (f (x)) > f (1 − 5x)?
f (b) − f (a) = (1 − b − b3 ) − (1 − a − a3 )
= (a − b) + (a3 − b3 )
= (a − b) + (a − b)(a2 + ab + b2 )
= (a − b)(a2 + ab + b2 + 1).
Since
b 2 3b2
Å ã
a2 + ab + b2 + 1 = a + + + 1 > 0,
2 4
we find that
f (x) < 1 − 5x
1 − x − x3 < 1 − 5x
x(x − 2)(x + 2) = x3 − 4x > 0.
Performing interval analysis or sign analysis on this last inequality shows that the
solution is all real x such that −2 < x < 0 or x > 2.
Show that for any sequence of 42 integers, one can insert plus signs, multipli-
cation signs, and parentheses between them so that the resulting expression is
divisible by one million.
The interested reader should also see the book by Peter Winkler: Mathematical
Puzzles, CRC Press 2021 – which has hundreds more great puzzles!
PROBLEM SOLVING
VIGNETTES
No. 21
Shawn Godin
Pythagorean Triples
The Pythagorean theorem, a2 + b2 = c2 , where a and b are the lengths of the
legs of a right angled triangle and c is the length of its hypotenuse, has a history
spanning several millennia and a plethora of cultures. Over the years, hundreds
of proofs have been supplied. It is one of the first mathematical theorems that
children see in school and, in some cases, is one of the few mathematical results
people retain in adulthood. Its use as a metric in Euclidean space means that it
is present explicitly and implicitly in many topics of school mathematics.
A Pythagorean triple is a triple of positive integers, (a, b, c) with a, b < c that
satisfy the Pythagorean theorem (by convention, when a Pythagorean triple is
listed, its elements are generally listed in increasing order). That is, a, b, and c are
the side lengths of an integer sided right triangle. The smallest, and perhaps best
known, example is (3, 4, 5). A quick check with a spreadsheet for 1 ≤ a, b ≤ 25
reveals ten more examples:
(5, 12, 13), (6, 8, 10), (7, 24, 25), (8, 15, 17), (9, 12, 15),
(10, 24, 26), (12, 16, 20), (15, 20, 25), (18, 24, 30), (20, 21, 29).
From these examples we can see that (6, 8, 10), (9, 12, 15), (12, 16, 20), (15, 20, 25),
and (18, 24, 30) are all multiples of (3, 4, 5) and correspond to dilating the original
triangle by an integer factor. Similarly, (10, 24, 26) is a multiple of (5, 12, 13). In
general, if a, b, c are integers that satisfy a2 + b2 = c2 , then, for any integer k
Hence, if (a, b, c) is a Pythagorean triple, then so is (ka, kb, kc) for any integer k.
It makes sense to define a primitive Pythagorean triple as one where the side
lengths are relatively prime, that is, gcd(a, b, c) = 1. Thus, from our examples so
far, (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), (7, 24, 25), (8, 15, 17), and (20, 21, 29) are primitive.
A common starting place for searching for Pythagorean triples is to look at squares,
modulo 4, as in their remainders upon division by 4.
n n2 (mod 4)
0 0
1 1
2 0
3 1
Since the squares, modulo 4, are 0 and 1, then a2 + b2 can take on three possible
values, modulo 4. If a and b are both even, then a2 + b2 ≡ 0 (mod 4). In this case,
any Pythagorean triple would not be primitive since a, b, and, thus also, c would
be even. Similarly, if a and b are both odd, a2 + b2 ≡ 2 (mod 4). However, in
this case, the result is not a square modulo 4, which tells us that no Pythagorean
triples have the two smallest values being odd. That means, if we want a primitive
Pythagorean triple, one of a and b is even and the other is odd, which also makes
c odd. Hence no primitive Pythagorean triple has even c. A quick check of
the Pythagorean triples from our list reinforces the properties that we have just
discovered in action.
Looking more closely, a pattern appears in the first three primitive Pythagorean
triples: (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), and (7, 24, 25). In all three examples, c = b + 1 and
b + c = a2 . If we let c = b + 1 and insert it into the Pythagorean theorem, we get
a2 + b2 = c2
a2 + b2 = (b + 1)2
a2 + b2 = b2 + 2b + 1
a2 = 2b + 1 = b + (b + 1) = b + c
showing that the second observation also holds. Further, since a2 = 2b+1 it means
that a must be odd and since b > 0, this forces a > 1 (otherwise we would have the
degenerate Pythagorean triple (a, 0, a), which isn’t very exciting). Thus, if we let
a = 2k + 1, for some non-negative integer k, then a2 = 2b + 1 yields b = 2k 2 + 2k
and c = 2k 2 + 2k + 1. Therefore
(2k + 1, 2k 2 + 2k, 2k 2 + 2k + 1), k ∈ Z+
is an infinite family of Pythagorean triples. However, since 2k 2 + 2k and 2k 2 +
2k + 1 are consecutive integers, they are necessarily relatively prime. Therefore
the Pythagorean triples shown above are primitive.
This might lead us to wonder, what if c = b + 2? Repeating the analysis yields
another infinite family
(2k, k 2 − 1, k 2 + 1), k ∈ Z+ , k > 1.
I will leave the details as an exercise for interested readers. In this case, if k is
odd, all the entries in the triple are even, so the triple is not primitive. If k is even,
then k 2 − 1 and k 2 + 1 are consecutive odd integers, and are therefore relatively
prime. Hence, if we only consider even k, the family described above would be
primitive.
We could continue in this matter and look at what happens if c = b + 3, c = b + 4,
. . . . Or, one might wonder, is there a way to describe all primitive Pythagorean
triples?
When I was in school and first encountered the algebraic identities
(x + y)2 = x2 + 2xy + y 2 and (x − y)2 = x2 − 2xy + y 2 ,
Hence, for xy to be a perfect square, we need x = km2 and y = kn2 for some
positive integers k, m, n. However, if k > 1, then the resulting Pythagorean triple
is not primitive. Hence
(m2 − n2 , 2mn, m2 + n2 ), m, n ∈ Z+ , m > n, (1)
is a Pythagorean triple. However, if d = gcd(m, n), then d2 is a factor of each term
of the triple. Therefore if we want the triple to be primitive we need gcd(m, n) = 1.
While this condition is necessary for the triple to be primitive, it is not sufficient.
For example, picking (m, n) = (5, 3) yields the Pythagorean triple (16, 30, 34)
which is not primitive. A quick check modulo 2 shows that if m and n are both
odd, the resulting Pythagorean triple will be made up of three even terms which
will therefore not be primitive. Thus, m and n will generate a primitive triple
only if m and n are relatively prime and have opposite parity (one is even and the
other is odd). I will leave verifying this fact to the interested reader.
Formula (1) is called Euclid’s formula as it appeared as proposition 29 in book X
of Euclid’s The Elements. All Pythagorean triples are of the form given in (1),
or a multiple of such a triple. For example (9, 12, 15) cannot be generated by (1),
however m = 2, n = 1 yields our famous (3, 4, 5) and (9, 12, 15) = (3×3, 3×4, 3×5).
A little algebra shows that (1) does indeed yield a Pythagorean triple. Hence, the
formula is sufficient to produce primitive Pythagorean triples, but is it necessary?
Assume that (a, b, c) is a primitive Pythagorean triple. Thus a, b, and c are
pairwise coprime (why?). We have shown already that a and b have opposite
parity, so assume, without loss of generality, that a is odd, making b even and c
odd.
Rearranging the Pythagorean theorem we get
a2 + b2 = c2
c2 − a2 = b2
c+a b
(c − a)(c + a) = b2 ⇒ =
b c−a
Since we are assuming, without loss of generality, that a < b < c, then a, b, and c
are distinct positive integers, c+a c+a m
b is rational and c − a > 0. Let b = n , where
m
gcd(m, n) = 1 (that is, n is in lowest terms). Then
b m c−a n
= ⇒ =
c−a n b m
which means that
c a m
+ = (2)
b b n
c a n
− = (3)
b b m
adding (2) and (3) yields
c m n
2 = +
b n m
c m2 + n2
= . (4)
b 2mn
Similarly, subtracting (3) from (2) yields
a m n
2 = −
b n m
a m2 − n2
= . (5)
b 2mn
If m and n are both odd, then m2 − n2 ≡ 0 (mod 4), from our discussion at the
start of the column, and thus
a m2 − n2 4k 2k
= = = , for some k ∈ Z+ .
b 2mn 2mn mn
However, since a and b are relatively prime ab is reduced to lowest terms which,
means that a must be even, a contradiction. Hence, m and n must have opposite
parity which means the expressions on the right sides of (4) and (5) are in lowest
terms. Since both sides of the equations in both (4) and (5) are already in lowest
terms, we get Euclid’s formula and we are done.
Here are some problems related to Pythagorean triples for your enjoyment.
1. If (a, b, c) is a primitive Pythagorean triple, show that exactly one of a and
b is a multiple of 3 and that c is never a multiple of 3.
2. If (a, b, c) is a primitive Pythagorean triple, show that 60 | abc.
3. If (a, b, c) is a primitive Pythagorean triple, show that the altitude from the
hypotenuse of the triangle with sides a, b, c does not have integer length.
4. Determine which positive integers are part of some primitive Pythagorean
triple.
with bad school math experiences in their past can get drawn in Parker is able
to push you that little bit, just enough to get momentum to hold your balance as
the ideas begin to take form. And the book is a great example of how one can use
different styles and rhetorical voice to express sophisticated ideas. In every section
Parker nudges the reader a little more forward toward that vital mathematical act
of generalization. For example, after talking about flat-packing and space filling
with polyhedral forms, he starts a new section of the chapter with “Moving on
. . . Get an orange”. What a lovely way to introduce the reader to the notion of
sphere-packing.
This book also contains a weird and delightful set of random mathematical history.
For example, Parker tells how Kepler uses an algorithm to find himself a wife; and
Chapter 3 begins, “In 1994 NASA calculated a strange numerical code and con-
cealed it in the backwaters of their website, where it remains to this day”, and then
describes how to find this secret. The book is a treasure trove of truly notewor-
thy old and contemporary mathematics. Parker cleverly weaves the new and old
together in a manner that reflects the interconnectivity of so many mathematical
topics. “Despite the fame of those limited-edition five Platonic solids, there are in
fact four more, which were completely unknown to the ancients. (Honestly, first
parallel lines and now this.)”
There are many open problems just tantalizingly hanging around in the book.
Parker explains each of them in a way that makes you feel that you should have
thought of this question, and how possibly can it not be known already. Including
open problems in a book is risky, because at any moment someone may find a
solution. No problem: Parker has made a website where he keeps things up to
date www.makeanddo4D.com – the author truly is devoted to getting the word out
that mathematics is fun, interesting, relevant, and alive.
If you do go out and buy this book, and I hope that you will, you can find
Parker’s favourite definition of maths (p. 40), his answer to why mathematicians
spend their time doing things for no practical reason (p. 51), and, on the last
two pages of Chapter 3, a really nice description of what it looks like when actual
mathematicians do math (together, and at the pub).
.................................................................
.................................................................
The first problem is from a first-year differential calculus course for students with-
out high school calculus. It requires some persistence but no “tricks”. A nice
feature of the problem is that students can confirm the correct answer using a
physical argument. In fact, a clever student might be able to proceed directly to
the physical argument and bypass the differentiation!
The second problem is from a first-year integral calculus course. I like this prob-
lem because it requires students to understanding something about the essence of
integration — “chop up and add”, as my colleague Lior Silberman puts it — and
not just follow a formula.
Problems
1. Imagine a disc of radius 1 m spinning anticlockwise at π rad/sec. A tight
elastic connector joins the point A on the rim of the disc to the stationary
point B located 1 m away from the disc, as shown below. Find the rate of
change of the angle θ at the moment α = π3 .
2. Let R denote the finite region enclosed by the curves y = x and y = x2 , and
let S denote the solid obtained by rotating R about the line y = x. Find the
volume of S.
Solutions
1. We can relate α and θ by dropping the perpendicular from point A.
sin(α)
It follows that tan(θ) = 2−cos(α) . Differentiating, we get
In the picture above, at position z on the diagonal axis, we have a disk of thickness
dz and radius r. To write r√in terms of z, we note that the dotted radius√is a
segment of the line y = −x+ 2z. This line intersects y = x2 when x2 = −x+ √ √2z,
2
√ −1+ 1+4 2z
or 0 = x +x− 2z. By the quadratic formula, this has solution x = 2 .
(The other solution describes the point of intersection in the second quadrant.)
By Pythagoras,
p √ å2
√ √ √ » √
Ç
−1 + 1 + 4 2z z
»
2
r =2 −√ = 1+3 2z+z 2 − 1 + 4 2z− 2z 1 + 4 2z.
2 2
The first three terms are more straightforward to antidifferentiate, and we handle
those first. The volume of S is equal to
√ √ √
Z 2
2
Ä ä √
2 √ » Z √ ã2 Å»
πr dz = π z+ √3 z 2 + 1 3
−π
1 + 4 2z + 2z 1 + 4 2z dz
2 3z
0
0 0
√
Z √2 » √
√
√ Z 2 » √
14 2π
= 3 −π 1 + 4 2z dz − 2π z 1 + 4 2z dz
0 0
√
For
√ both integrals in the last line, we substitute u = 1 + 4 2z, getting du =
4 2z dz,
√ √
Z 2 » √ 1
Z 9
√ 1 9
13 2
1 + 4 2z dz = √ u du = √ u3/2 = .
0 4 2 1 6 2 1 6
and
√
Z 2 √ »
1
Z 9
√ 1 2 5/2 2 3/2
Å ã 9
149
1 + 4 2z dz =
z u(u − 1) du = u − u = .
0 32 1 32 5 3 1 60
Ä √ √ √ ä √
Thus the volume of S is equal to π 143 2 − 136 2 − 14960 2 = 602π
.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
No. 401
The problems featured in this section have appeared in a regional or national mathematical
Olympiad.
OC571. The Tournament of Towns is held once per year. The 43rd such
tournament took place in 2021 and, amazingly, 43 is a divisor of 2021: 2021 ÷ 43 =
47. How many times more will humanity witness such a wonderful event?
and
M2 = {n ∈ N | System (Sn ) has no solutions}.
Prove that:
a) 7 ∈ M1 and 10 ∈ M2 ;
b) sets M1 and M2 are infinite.
.................................................................
Les problèmes présentés dans cette section ont déjà été présentés dans le cadre d’une
olympiade mathématique régionale ou nationale.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 juin 2022.
OC571. Le Tournoi des Villages se tient une fois par année. Or, le 43-ième
tel tournoi a eu lieu en 2021 et, remarquablement, 43 est un diviseur de 2021, car
2021 ÷ 43 = 47. Combien de fois verrons-nous une autre telle situation ?
et
M2 = {n ∈ N | le système (Sn ) ne possède aucune solution}.
Démontrer que:
a) 7 ∈ M1 et 10 ∈ M2 ;
b) les ensembles M1 et M2 sont infinis.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(8), p. 377–378.
we get that 6(abc)2 is also an integer. But 6(abc)2 = m2 /6 from which it follows
that m is a multiple of 6. Thus abc is an integer.
From the identity
we get that 2(ab + bc + ca) is an integer, say 2(ab + bc + ca) = k. From the identity
we get that 2(ab + bc + ca)2 is also an integer. But 2(ab + bc + ca)2 = k 2 /2 from
which it follows that k is a multiple of 2. Thus ab + bc + ca is an integer.
Let p = a + b + c, q = ab + bc + ca, and r = abc. By Vieta’s formula a, b, c
are the roots of the monic cubic polynomial x3 − px2 + qx − r. Since p, q, and r
are integers, it follows that a, b, c are the roots of a monic cubic polynomial with
integer coefficients, as required.
Let a, b, c be the side lengths of triangle ABC. Let R,r,s,E be the circumradius,
inradius, semiperimeter, and area of the triangle, respectively. From the law of
cosines in triangle AIO we have
OI 2 + AI 2 − OA2
cos ∠AIO = .
2 × OI × AI
If D is the point of tangency of the incircle and AB, we have
Also, Euler’s theorem in geometry implies OI 2 = R(R − 2r). Therefore the follow-
ing are equivalent
(a) We will show that the triangles AQC and P QB are similar. Since ∠P BC =
∠ACQ = 45◦ it is enough to show that BQ PB AC
= CQ or equivalently that
BQ
CQ = PAC
B
= AM
AC = tan ϑ where ϑ = ∠M CA = ∠QAB. By Sine Law on
triangles ABQ and ACQ we have
BQ AQ CQ CQ CQ
= = = = .
sin ϑ sin 45◦ sin (∠CAQ) sin (90◦ − ϑ) cos ϑ
BQ
Thus CQ = tan ϑ as required.
(b) Since D is the midpoint of BC, then AD = BD = CD and since ∠DCA =
45◦ then ∠CAD = 45◦ and ∠ADC = 90◦ . So D lies on the circle with
diameter AC. So does R and therefore, ∠DRQ = ∠DCA = 45◦ .
Remove two triangles, the one at the Fold the triangle from the left, as
top and the one from the right. shown. Part (a) follows.
Editor’s Comment. Solution 1 is rigorous, whereas Solution 2 is a visual solu-
tion. The graphic nature of the solution by Jaimin Patel appeals to the reader’s
geometrical intuition. The text under each picture supports this intuition.
OC550. The real numbers x, y, and z are not all equal and satisfy:
1 1 1
x+ = y + = z + = k.
y z x
Determine all possible values of k.
Originally from the 2006 Nordic Mathematical Contest, Problem 2.
We received 15 submissions, of which 13 were correct and complete. We present
a typical solution.
If two of the numbers x, y, z are equal, then it is obvious that they are all equal,
1
which is not allowed. Let x, y, z be mutually distinct with xyz 6= 0. From z+ = k
x
1 kx − 1 1
and x + = k we get z = , and y = . Substituting into the final
y x k−x
equation we get
1 1 x
k=y+ = + .
z k − x kx − 1
Clearing denominators we get
(k 2 − 1)(x2 − kx + 1) = 0.
1
If x2 − kx + 1 = 0 then y = = x, which is not allowed.
k−x
Therefore, k 2 = 1, equivalently, k = 1 or k = −1. These two values are obtained
with the following solutions
1 x+1
Å ã
(x, y, z, k) = x, − ,− , −1 , with x(x + 1) 6= 0,
x+1 x
and
1 1−x
Å ã
(x, y, z, k) = x, ,− ,1 , with x(1 − x) 6= 0.
1−x x
FOCUS ON...
No. 50
Michel Bataille
Linear algebra (I)
Introduction
Linear algebra occupies quite a large space in undergraduate syllabuses and regu-
larly appears in problem corners. So it seems of interest to present a selection of
problems centered on various objects pertaining to linear algebra (determinants,
matrices, ...). In this number and the next one, we have tried to choose examples
that lead to some valuable tricks or methods, often worthy of being kept in mind.
In this first part, we consider results about determinants, rank and trace. In part
II, we will focus on eigenvalues and polynomials of matrices.
Determinants
We begin with the following easy problem proposed in the October 2009 issue of
Mathematics Magazine:
Let A be an n×n matrix with integer entries and such that each column
of A is a permutation of the first column. Prove that if the entries in
the first column do not sum to 0, then this sum divides det(A).
In each column, the entries add up to the same sum s (because they are the
same entries as in the first column up to order). By adding rows 2, 3, . . . , n to
the first row, the determinant remains unchanged while its first row becomes
s s · · · s . Thus, s can be factored and det(A) = s det(A0 ) where A0 is a
matrix with integer entries. The result follows since det(A0 ) is an integer.
Note that the calculation of det(A0 ) could continue by subtracting column 1 from
columns 2, 3, . . . , n. This leads to 1 0 · · · 0 as the first row and to an easy
expansion. The method is exemplified by problem 1789 of Mathematics Magazine,
proposed in February 2008:
For nonzero real numbers a1 , a2 , . . . , an , define s = nk=1 a1k and
P
á ë
t + a1 t ... t
t t + a2 ... t
A= .. .. .. .. ,
. . . .
t t ... t + an
Å n
ã
we obtain det(A) = ak · det(B), where
Q
k=1
á ë
1 + b1 b1 b1 ... b1
b2 1 + b2 b2 ... b2
B= .. .. .. .. .
. . . ··· .
bn bn bn ... 1 + bn
Again, the useful observation is that in each column the entries add up to 1 + st.
Following the remark above, we obtain that
1
0 0 ... 0
1 0 ... 0
b2
det(B) = (1 + st) .
.. .. . .
..
. . · · · ..
bn 0 0 . . . 1
Å n ã
Thus, det(B) = 1 + st and det(A) = ak · (1 + st).
Q
k=1
0 a1
Clearly, = −a1 b1 , hence the result holds for n = 1. Assuming that the
b1 1
result holds for some integer n ≥ 1 and expanding the determinant
0 a1 · · · an+1
b1
∆n+2 = ..
. In+1
bn+1
along the last row, we find
∆n+2 = −(a1 b1 +· · ·+an bn )+(−1)n+3 bn+1 (−1)n+2 an+1 = −(a1 b1 +· · ·+an bn +an+1 bn+1 ),
which completes the induction step.
We can resort to (1) for a variant of solution to 3928 [2014 : 124 ; 2015 : 133]:
Let A ∈ Mn (C) with rank(A) ≤ 1 and complex numbers x1 , x2 , . . . , xn
0 x1 · · · xn
Ü ê
n x1
with x2k = 1. If B = and In+1 is the unit
P
..
k=1 . A
xn
Because rank(A) ≤ 1, we can find row vectors U = u1 · · · un and V =
v1 · · · vn such that A = U T V [this is obvious if A = 0; if rank(A) = 1, this
follows from the fact that the columns of A are of the form v1 U T , v2 U T , . . . , vn U T ].
n
Then, achieving a block-multiplication and using x2k = 1, it is readily checked
P
k=1
that á ëá ë
0 x1 · · · xn 0 v1 · · · vn
u1 x1
In+1 + B = .. .. .
. In . In
un xn
From (1) we deduce
The relation (1) also provides a quick solution to 3188 [2007 : 112 ; 2007 : 447]:
Let z1 , z2 , . . . , zn be the zeroes of the complex polynomial A(z) = z n +
an−1 z n−1 + · · · + a1 z + a0 , where a0 6= 0. Prove that
n z1 z2 ... zn
z1 1 + z12 1 ... 1
2
det
z2 1 1 + z2 . . . 1 = a21 .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
zn 1 1 ... 1 + zn2
0 1 ... 1
1/z1
det(A) = (z1 z2 . . . zn ) .
.. In
1/zn
1 1 1
Å ã
= −(z1 z2 . . . zn ) + + ··· +
z1 z2 zn
n
= (−1) a1 ,
n n
the latter because zk = (−1)n−1 a1 . The result follows.
P Q
j=1 k=1,k6=j
n = rk (In ) = rk (A+In −A) ≤ rk (A)+rk (In −A) ≤ tr (A)+tr (In −A) = tr (In ) = n
This nice property allows an elementary solution to problem 4081 [2015 : 397 ; 405]:
Determine all A, B ∈ M2 (R) such that:
Å ã
2 2 22 44
A +B = ,
Å14 28ã
10 20
AB + BA = .
2 4
Å ã Å ã
3 6 1 2
Let H = and K = . We show that the solutions for the pairs
2 4 0 0
(A, B) are (H, K), (K, H), (−H, −K), (−K, −H).
It is readily checked that these pairs are indeed solutions.
Conversely, let (A, B) be an arbitrary solution and let S = A + B and D = A − B.
Then Å ã
2 2 2 2 4
S = A + B + AB + BA = 16
1 2
and Å ã
1 2
D2 = A2 + B 2 − (AB + BA) = 12 (2).
1 2
We observe that S 2 and D2 have rank 1 so that S, D cannot be O2 nor be invertible,
hence S and D have rank 1 as well. It follows that S 2 = tr(S)S and D2 = tr(D)D
and therefore tr(S 2 ) = (tr(S))2 and tr(D2 ) = (tr(D))2 . From (2), we then deduce
that tr(S) = 8 or −8 and tr(D) = 6 or −6 and so
1 1
Å ã Å ã
2 4 1 2
S= S 2 = ±2 , D= D2 = ±2 .
tr(S) 1 2 tr(D) 1 2
We know that tr(P Q) = tr(QP ); moreover, since P, Q are idempotent with the
same rank, we have tr(P ) = rk (P ) = rk (Q) = tr(Q). As a result, tr((P − Q)(P −
Q)T ) = 2(tr(P ) − tr(P Q)).
To conclude, we observe that P Q is idempotent (since (P Q)2 = (P QP )Q = P Q)
and that
rk (P ) = rk (P QP ) ≤ rk (P Q) ≤ rk (P ).
Thus, rk (P ) = rk (P Q), that is, tr(P ) = tr(P Q) and tr((P − Q)(P − Q)T ) = 0
follows.
Exercises
1. Let A = (ai,j ) ∈ M4 (F) be such that ai,i = a2 , ai,5−i = b2 , ai,j = ab for
j 6= i, 5 − i (i, j = 1, 2, 3, 4). Calculate det(A).
2. Let A ∈ Mn (F) satisfy A2 = kA (k ∈ F) and let r = rk (A). Prove that
det(In + A) = (1 + k)r .
3. Let A ∈ Mn (R) satisfy AAT = A2 . Prove that AT = A.
PROBLEMS
Click here to submit problems proposals as well as solutions, comments
and generalizations to any problem in this section.
Express un as a function of n.
.................................................................
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 1 juin 2022.
Ç å Ç å Ç å Ç å
n n−1 n−2 n−3
an = + + + + ....
0 2 4 6
1 1 1
8
+ 8
=
(x + 1) (y + 1) 8(xy + 1)4
BONUS PROBLEMS
These problems appear as a bonus. Their solutions will not be considered for publication.
Prove that P QRS has the same area as the given quadrilateral ABCD.
a b c 108r2
√ +√ +√ ≥ √ √ √ .
s+b s+c s+a a s+b+b s+c+c s+a
where
n Ç å
1X n (−1)k−1
Un = .
n k+1 k
k=1
k a2 + b2 + c2 3(ab + bc + ca)
+ ≥2
ab + bc + ca (a + b + c)2
holds for all positive real numbers a, b, c.
SOLUTIONS
No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consider for
publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2021: 47(8), p. 392–397.
θ θ
2(r1 + r2 ) = c(cos B − 1) tan + b(cos C − 1) cot + k.
2 2
where k is independent of θ.
b(cos C−1)
It follows that r1 + r2 is maximum when f (t) = c(cos B − 1)t + t is
maximum (tan C2 < t < tan π−B
2 ).
Therefore
B+θ
ã Å
cos
1 2 B θ
ã= = 1 − tan tan
B+θ
Å Å ã
θ B θ 2 2
sin θ tan + cot cos cos
2 2 2 2
and
θ−C
ã Å
sin
1 2 C θ
ã= = 1 − tan cot .
θ−C
Å Å ã
θ θ C 2 2
sin θ cot + tan sin cos
2 2 2 2
Therefore
Å ã
bc B θ C θ
r1 + r2 = 2 − tan tan − tan cot
2R 2 2 2 2
B θ C θ
f (θ) = tan tan + tan cot
2 2 2 2
is minimised. Observe that since all quantities involved in the definition of f are
positive, the A.M-G.M inequality gives us
…
B C
f (θ) ≥ 2 tan tan
2 2
θ tan(C/2)
with equality if, and only if tan= . Thus the maximum value of
2 tan(B/2)
θ tan(C/2)
r1 + r2 is attained when tan = which corresponds to that position
2 tan(B/2)
of M on the side BC which makes
Ç … å
bc B C
r1 = r2 = 1− tan tan .
2R 2 2
x
law of cosines in triangle ABM we get y 2 = c2 + x2 − · (a2 + c2 − b2 ). Therefore,
a
a−x 2x 2(a − x)
Å ã Å ã
h x h
r1 + r2 = + = +
2 s1 s2 2 y+c+x y+b+a−x
ah −2x2 + (2a + b − c)x + a(c + y)
= ·
a+b+c (b − c)x + ac + ay
2x(x − a)
ï ò
ah
= 1−
a+b+c (b − c)x + ac + ay
2
ß ™
ah
= 1+ 2 · [(b − c)x + ac − ay] .
a+b+c a − (b − c)2
a2 a2 − (b − c)2 4y 2 − (b + c)2 + a2 = 0.
1
Also, f 00 (x) = − (a + c)2 − b2 b2 − (a − c)2 < 0. Thus, the maximum
4ay 3
value of r1 + r2 is achieved when M ≡ Mo , where
1» √ A
AMo = yo = (b + c)2 − a2 = bc · cos ,
2 2
or when
1 h 2 » i a 2c + p(b + c)2 − a2
2 2
BMo = xo = a + c − b + (b − c) (b + c) − a = ·
2 2 p .
2a 2 b + c + (b + c)2 − a2
Obviously 0 < xo < a, and therefore there is a single solution for the position of
M for which r1 + r2 = max. It is easy to show that at maximum we have r1 = r2 .
Indeed,
a 2c + 2yo xo c + xo + yo xo s1
xo = · =⇒ = =⇒ = =⇒ r1 = r2 .
2 b + c + 2yo a − xo a + b + yo − xo a − xo s2
Finally, if E, r, s are the area, inradius, and semiperimeter of triangle ABC, respec-
tively, we have E = rs = r1 s1 +r2 s2 . Therefore, at maximum we have r1 = r2 = ro
and thus
rs (a + b + c)r
ro = = p .
s + yo a + b + c + (b + c)2 − a2
A A
acute obtuse
B H M C H B M C
Let a = BC, b = CA, c = AB, be the side lenghts of 4ABC, and A = ∠BAC,
B = ∠CBA and C = ∠ACB be the measures of its angles; let H be the foot of
altitude from the vertex A.
−AM + BM + c B
r1 = tan ,
2 2
−AM + CM + b C
r2 = tan ,
2 2
AM = BM + c − 2BM c cos B = (BM − c cos B)2 + c2 sin2 B.
2 2 2
p
We put x = BM − c cos B = HM . Then x ≥ 0, so that AM = x2 + c2 sin2 B,
BM = x + c cos B, CM = a − BM = c cos B + b cos C − BM , and then
p
− x2 + c2 sin2 B + x + c(1 + cos B) B
r1 = tan ,
p 2 2
2
− x + c sin B − x + b(1 + cos C)
2 2 C
r2 = tan ·
2 2
We compute
Å ã Å ã
B C x B C
f 0 (x) = − tan + tan p + tan − tan ;
2 2 x2 + c2 sin2 B 2 2
C 2 2 C 2 2
Å ã Å ã
B B
x + c2 sin2 B
tan + tan x = tan − tan
2 2 2 2
Å ã2
B C B C
⇐⇒ 4 tan tan x2 = tan − tan c2 sin2 B
2 2 2 2
sin B2 sin C2 2 sin2 B−C
2
⇐⇒ 4 B C
x = B C
bc sin B sin C since c sin B = b sin B
cos 2 cos 2 cos2 2 cos2 2
sin B2 sin C2 2 sin2 B−C
2 B B C C
⇐⇒ 4 x = 4 bc sin cos sin cos
cos B2 cos C2 cos2 B2 cos2 C
2
2 2 2 2
B−C
⇐⇒ x2 = bc sin2 ·
2
√ A
and then AM = bc cos ·
2
√ A √
Since x ≥ 0, M belongs to the half-line HC. We notice AM = bc cos < bc,
2
and AM < b, since c ≤ b; then M is between H and C.
Then, we have shown that the position of M , on the side BC, which yields the
maximum value of r1 + r2 , is given by
√ B−C
BM = c cos B + bc sin ·
2
Solution 5 by C. R. Pranesachar.
Let a = BC, b = CA, c = AB be the side lengths of triangle ABC; let s be
its semiperimeter, F its area, R its circumradius, r its inradius, ha its altitude
through A (see figure on page 4). We have
F 2R2 sin A sin B sin C a
r= = = sin B sin C
s s s
and
ha = c sin B = 2R sin B sin C.
Let ∠AM B = t. Then by the sine rule applied to triangles AM B and AM C, we
have
c sin(B + t) c sin B b sin C b sin(t − C)
BM = , AM = = , CM = .
sin t sin t sin t sin t
Then
1 B
r1 = (AB + BM − AM ) tan
2 2
1 c sin(B + t) c sin B
Å ã
B
= c+ − tan
2 sin t sin t 2
1 sin(B + t) sin B
Å ã
B
= c 1+ − tan
2 sin t sin t 2
1 B 1 B
= c(1 + cos B) tan + c(sin B cot t − sin B csc t) tan .
2 2 2 2
Also
1 C
r2 = (AC + CM − AM ) tan
2 2
1 b sin(t − C) b sin C
Å ã
C
= b+ − tan
2 sin t sin t 2
1 sin(t − C) sin C
Å ã
C
= b 1+ − tan
2 sin t sin t 2
1 C 1 C
= b(1 + cos C) tan + b(− sin C cot t − sin C csc t) tan .
2 2 2 2
Note that
1 B 1 C
c(1 + cos B) tan = b(1 + cos C) tan = R sin B sin C.
2 2 2 2
So Å ã
B C
r1 + r2 =2R sin B sin C + R sin B sin C tan − tan cot t
2 2
Å ã
B C
−R sin B sin C tan + tan csc t.
2 2
If we set
B C
tan = u, tan = v,
2 2
we see that
d
(r1 + r2 ) =R sin B sin C((u − v)(− csc2 t) + (u + v) csc t cot t)
dt
−(u − v) + (u + v) cos t
Å ã
=R sin B sin C .
sin2 t
d u−v
Thus dt (r1 + r2 ) = 0 implies cos t = u+v . Again
d2 −2 cos t (u + v)
Å Å ã ã
(r1 + r2 ) =R sin B sin C (−(u − v) + (u + v) cos t) − .
dt2 sin2 t sin t
Therefore when
u−v
cos t = ,
u+v
we have
d2 (u + v)
(r1 + r2 ) = −(R sin B sin C) < 0,
dt2 sin t
because sin t > 0 for 0 < t < π. So r1 + r2 is maximum when
u−v
cos t = .
u+v
√
2 uv
Since sin t = , we have
u+v
(u − v) (u + v)
Å ã
max(r1 + r2 ) = 2R sin B sin C + R sin B sin C (u − v) · √ − (u + v) · √
2 uv 2 uv
√
= 2R sin B sin C + R sin B sin C · (−2 uv)
√
= 2R sin B sin C · (1 − uv)
Ç … å
s−a
= 2R sin B sin C · 1 −
s
Ç … å
s−a
= ha 1 − ,
s
because
…
B C (s − c)(s − a) (s − a)(s − b) s−a
tan tan = = .
2 2 ca ab s
Thus Ç … å
s−a 2r
max(r1 + r2 ) = ha 1− = » .
s 1+ s−a
s
Remark. Walther Janous noted that this problem has been settled in a much
more general setting in [1], p. 351 - 352, entry 2.14.
[1] D. S. Mitrinović et al., Recent Advances in Geometric Inequalities. Kluwer
Acad. Publ. Dordrecht 1989.
It follows that the hypothesis can be written |z1 | + |z2 | = |z1 + z2 | where
z1 = b + aω, z2 = −b − cω 2 .
Since z1 , z2 6= 0, we deduce that z1 = λz2 for some positive real number λ, that
is, b + aω = λ(c − b + cω). As a result, we have b = λ(c − b) and a = λc,
hence
√ bc = a(c − b), from which we obtain a2 + b2 + c2 = (c + a − b)2 . Thus,
a + b2 + c2 = |c + a − b|, a rational number.
2
(OA)(OC)
b2 = OB 2 = ((OA + OC)2 − BC 2 )
(OA + OC)2
ac
= ((a + c)2 − (a2 + ac + c2 ))
(a + c)2
ac 2
Å ã
= .
a+c
So,
ã2
(a2 + c2 )(a + c)2 + (ac)2 a4 + 2a3 c + 3a2 c2 + 2ac3 + c4 a2 + ac + c2
Å
a2 +b2 +c2 = 2
= = .
(a + c) (a + c)2 a+c
√
Thus a2 + b2 + c2 is a rational number.
We received ten solutions, all correct, and will sample two of them.
Solution 1, a composite of the almost identical solutions from Michel Bataille and
from the UCLan Cyprus Problem Solving Group.
We use barycentric coordinates. Let A = (1, 0, 0), B = (0, 1, 0) and C = (0, 0, 1).
Assume P = (x, y, z) with x + y + z = 1.
Since A1 belongs to the line AB, we have A1 = (r, 1 − r, 0) for some r. Similarly
A2 = (s, 0, 1 − s) for some s.
The centroid of P A1 A2 has coordinates 31 (x + r + s, y + 1 − r, z + 1 − s), from
which we deduce that r = 1 + y and s = 1 + z.
Thus A1 = (1 + y, −y, 0), A2 = (1 + z, 0, −z). Cyclically we get
1+y −y 0
[A1 B1 C1 ]
= 0 1+z −z
[ABC]
−x 0 1+x
=(1 + x)(1 + y)(1 + z) − xyz
1+z 0 −z
[A2 B2 C2 ]
= −x 1+x 0 = .
[ABC]
0 −y 1+y
Proof of the theorem. Because the result belongs to affine geometry, we may take
(without loss of generality) the origin at B, and let C = (1, 0) and A = (0, 1)
be the unit points of the x- and y-axes. As in the accompanying figure we take
B2 = (0, b) to be the point chosen on AB, so that C1 = (1 − b, b) is the point
where y = b intersects AC (which is the line y = 1 − x). Similarly, the choice of
C2 = (c, 0) gives us A1 = (0, c), and A2 = (a, 1 − a) gives B1 = (a, 0). The areas
of triangles A1 B1 C1 and A2 B2 C2 are therefore, respectively
0 c 1 a 1−a 1
a 0 1 and 0 b 1 ,
1−b b 1 c 0 1
which both equal ab − bc − ca + c.
It remains to see that the theorem applies to the configuration of problem 4673.
In ∆P B1 B2 note that because B1 is on the line BC, while B is assumed to be
the centroid, the median B1 B must lie along BC and, therefore, BC contains the
midpoint of side P B2 . Similarly, we see that BC passes through the midpoint of
the side P C1 of ∆P C1 C2 . Consequently, the base B2 C1 of ∆P B2 C2 is parallel to
the line BC, which passes through the midpoints of the other two sides. In the
same way, CA||C2 A1 and AB||A2 B1 , as desired.
Editor’s comments. There is an interesting alternative statement for the theorem
of solution 2: Given a set of six points in the plane, no three collinear, form the
hexagon A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 . If the vertices are arranged so that Ai Ai+1 ||Ai−1 Ai+2
for i = 1, 3, 5 (where the indices are taken modulo 6), then the triangles A0 A2 A4
and A1 A3 A5 have the same area.
a2 + b2 + c2 3
a4 + b4 + c4 − (a3 + b3 + c3 ) ≥ − = 0.
2 2
Equality occurs when a = b = c = 1.
We received 12 submissions, all quite similar, and present the common solution.
We extend the result by allowing E to be any point in the interior of the quadri-
lateral. Recall that in a triangle U V W , if the bisector of ∠V U W intersects V W
VX VU
at X, then W X = W U . Applying this theorem to the four triangles with vertex
E (and one side of the quadrilateral as its opposite side), we deduce that
AF AE BG BE CH CE DI DE
= , = , = , and = .
BF BE CG CE DH DE AI AE
Consequently,
AF BG CH DI AE BE CE DE
· · · = · · · = 1.
BF CG DH AI BE CE DE AE
Editor’s comments. Observe that we never made use of the convexity assumption:
the same conclusion follows should E be any point in the plane of an arbitrary
quadrilateral ABCD as long as the points where the four angle bisectors meet
the sides of the quadrilateral are well defined. Indeed, the analogous result would
apply to any polygon in the plane. The case of a triangle is especially amusing: For
a point P in the plane of triangle ABC, define the points D, E, and F to be the
intersections of the sides BC, CA, and AB with the bisectors of ∠BP C, ∠CP A,
and ∠AP B, respectively (where P is restricted to those points for which all three
points of intersection are well defined). Then the cevians AD, BE, and CF are
concurrent.
√ √
where u = 2 + 1 and v = 2 − 1 = u−1 .
Let ∞
x(arctan tx − arctan t−1 x)
Z
g(t) = dx.
0 x2 + 4
for t > 0. Observe that g(1) = 0 and that I = g(u). Then
Z ∞ Z ∞
0 x2 dx x2 dx
g (t) = + .
0 (1 + t2 x2 )(x2 + 4) 0 (t2 + x2 )(x2 + 4)
1
When t = 2 and t = 2 respectively, the first and second integrals are 4 and 1 times
∞ π/2 π/2
x2 dx (4 tan2 θ) d(2 tan θ) 1
Z Z Z
π
= = sin2 θ dθ = .
0 (x2 + 4)2 0 16 sec4 θ 2 0 8
For t 6= 21 ,
Z ∞ Z ∞Å
x2 dx 1 1 4
ã
= − dx
0 (1 + t2 x2 )(x2 + 4) 1 − 4t2 0 1 + t2 x2 x2 + 4
1 1 x ∞
ï ò
π
= arctan tx − 2 arctan = .
1 − 4t2 t 2 0 2t(1 + 2t)
This agrees with the answer π/2 when t = 1/2.
For t 6= 2,
Z ∞ Z ∞Å
x2 dx 1 4 t2
ã
= − dx
0 (x2 + t2 )(x2 + 4) 4 − t2 0 x2 + 4 x2 + t2
1 h x x i∞ π
= 2 arctan − t arctan = .
4 − t2 2 t 0 2(2 + t)
so that
π ln w π ln w
f (0) = +0= .
w w
Now
∞ Z ∞
2t 2t 1 1
Z ï ò
f 0 (t) = dx = − dx
0 (x2 + t2 )(x2 + w2 ) 0 w2 − t2 x2 + t2 x2 + w 2
2t 1 1 x ∞ 2
ï ò ï ò
x π πt π
= 2 arctan − arctan = − = .
w − t2 t t w w 0 w 2 − t2 2 2w w(w + t)
Hence
π ln(w + t)
f (t) = .
w
Applying this result when (t, w) = (2, u), (2, v) yields
√ √ Ç√ å
π ln( 2 + 3) π ln( 2 + 1) π 2+3
I= − = ln √ .
2 2 2 2+1
This can be evaluated decomposing the integrand into partial fractions and then
integrating to evaluate the integral. Our result corresponds to θ = π/4.
Didier Pinchon followed the strategy of Solution 1 and evaluated
Z ∞
arctan(u/x)[x(x2 + 4)−1 ] dx
0
1 j X n+1−j 1 j
Ç åÅ Ç åÅ
X n+1−j ã ã
= − + −
j
j 5 j
j−1 5
1 j−1
Ç åÅ
1X n+1−j
ã
= A(n + 1) − −
5 j j−1 5
1
= A(n + 1) − A(n) .
5
So the sequence A(n) satisfies a homogeneous secondÄ orderä recurrence relation
with characteristic equation x − x + 5 and roots 2 1 ± √15 . So
2 1 1
Ç√ ån Ç√ ån
5+1 5−1
A(n) = A √ +B √
2 5 2 5
√ √
1+ 5 1− 5
for some constants A, B. Since A(0) = A(1) = 1 we get A = 2 and B = 2 .
Thus
√ √
( 5 + 1)n+1 − ( 5 − 1)n+1
A(n) = .
2n+1 · 5n/2
Thus the required expression is equal to 2n .
Find
2 nxn
lim + xn .
n→∞ 3
16 correct solutions were received, plus one incomplete and one incorrect solution.
We give the solution presented essentially by most of the solvers. The main variant
was to work out the limit of the logarithm.
n 1
xn = = − un
3n + 4 3
and
n2 1 4n2
Å ãÅ ã
nxn = = ,
3n + 4 un 3(3n + 4)2
4
where un = 3(3n+4) . Therefore
î ó(4n2 )/(3(3n+4)2 )
lim ( 23 + xn )nxn = lim (1 − un )1/un = (e−1 )4/27 = e−4/27 .
n→∞ n→∞
In triangle ABC with |BC| > |AC| > |AB|, the circle C1 , centered at C and
with radius CA, meets the sides AB, BC at points P, Q, respectively and the
circle C2 , centered at B and with radius BA, meets the sides AC, BC at points
S, T , respectively. Let A0 be the second intersection point of C1 and C2 and let
O1 , O2 , O3 , O4 , O5 be the circumcenters of triangles CST, SAP, P BQ, BA0 Q, A0 CT ,
respectively. Prove that the points C, O1 , S, O2 , P, O3 , B, O4 , A0 , O5 are concyclic.
We received 10 submissions. Our featured solution combines ideas from the similar
solutions by Michel Bataille, Prithwijit De, Marie-Nicole Gras, and the UCLan
Cyprus Problem Solving Group.
By assumption, the angle at A is the largest angle of ∆ABC. Comparing the two
sides of Figure 1, we see that the position of P on the line AB depends on whether
of not ∠BAC is acute or obtuse, and the same with S on AC. Consequently
care must be taken — angles that are equal in the diagram on the left might be
supplementary in the diagram on the right. (When the angle at A is a right angle,
the points P and S coincide with A.) Here we will use the symbol ∠XY Z to
represent a directed angle, namely the angle through which the line XY must be
rotated in the positive direction about the vertex Y to coincide with Y Z. With
this notation the supplement of ∠XY Z is ∠ZY X = −∠XY Z.
As a first step we show that the points A0 , B, C, P , and S all lie on the same circle,
call it ω.
Figure 2: The points P, O2 , S, C (on left) and S, O1 , C, B (on right) are concyclic.
Next we see that O2 lies on ω (considered as the circle defined by the points
P, S, C); see the left side of Figure 2. Because ∆CAP is isosceles,
∠P CS = ∠P CA = 2∠P AC = 2∠P AS = ∠P O2 S,
with the final equality holding because the angle at the center of a circle is twice
any inscribed angle that is subtended by the same arc. It follows that the points
P, O2 , S, C are concyclic, as claimed.
Finally, the remaining centers Oi follow the same pattern as O2 :
• From BS = BT and O1 the center of the circle through S, T, C, we have
∠SBC = ∠SO1 C (right side Figure 2).
• From CP = CQ and O3 the center of the circle through P, Q, B, we have
∠P CB = ∠P O3 B.
• From CA0 = CQ and O4 the center of the circle through A0 , Q, B, we have
∠A0 CB = ∠A0 O4 B.
• From BA0 = BT and O5 the center of the circle through A0 , T, C, we have
∠A0 BC = ∠A0 O5 C.