Computer Aided Drug Design Unit 1
Computer Aided Drug Design Unit 1
r- Structure based
drug design
______
..... I
r _,._: Ligand based
drug design -.
\ Vlrtu~~g /
screenl_:j
>»»»>»
□ INTRODUCTION
• Drug discovery involves identification of the compound which have the
potential to be converted into a therapeutic product.
• Drug discovery is the initial phase characterized by a search for
appropriate targets or effects and identification of small molecules or
biologics that selectively modulate those targets.
• Drug discovery and development is complex, time consuming, costly
process which carries commercial risk.
• Discovering and developing new treatments for diseases and other
medical conditions is a lengthy and expensive process. Millions of
dollars and years of work is involved in getting a therapeutic product
manufactured, tested, approved and marketed for use of patients.
• Drug discovery and development are broadly divided into two category.
a) Preclinical evaluation:- This step validates the safety and biological
activity of a therapeutic compound through in vitro and animal studies.
b) Clinical trials:- It follow preclinical studies and are designed to
determine the safe and most effective dosages, route of a dministra tion,
efficacy (how well the therapeutic compound works) a nd patient
outcomes.
Th•Dn,g
0.v•lopm•nt
,,oc..,
To Confirm
Safety and
Effectiveness
□ LEAD DISCOVERY
• Once a target & a testing system has been chosen, the next is to find a
"Lead Compound" which shows the desired pharmaceutical activity.
• A lead compound is generally defined as a new chemical entity that could
potentially be developed into a new drug by optimizing its beneficial
effects and minimizing its side effects.
• Lead compounds are typically used as starting points in the drug design
to give new drug entities.
• Drug Design strategies can be used to . improve the compound's
pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties.
• It is the process of chemical modification of lead molecules and their
subsequent characterization in order to obtain drug-like compounds.
• The developed leads are characterized by in vitro and in vivo biological
activities, physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetic and
toxicological properties.
• Lead optintization includes selection of ligand libraries, and then
ntaking chemical modifications to molecules and characterize them
with suitable properties to become a drug.
• Lead opti1nization includes identifica tion of pharmacophores,
opti111ization of functional groups, structura l activity re lations hip
stud ies, and ho1nologation
•!• Serendipitous drug discovery:-
• It is also called lead discovery without a lead (Finding something new
while looking for something else), accidental or unexpected drug
discovery is called serendipitous drug discovery.
• Penicillin discovery- Staphylococcus culture contaminated with mold
• Warfarin discovery- Catties fed with clover hay
• Nitrous oxide discovery as anaesthetics (nitrogen fillings released NOi)
• Cisplatin discovery- Effects of electric field on E. coli growth (Platinum
conducting fields)
• Saccharin discovery
• Lithium discovery
~
~
?i
,,,,c.. .
H
= 0
OH
CH 2 NH ~ S CH3 II
HC, ,,,,c ...
0
~N
"__/c13 ,
CH 2 ' CH3
C 0
Penlclllln I/ ' OH
0
Warfarln
0
Cl i.&o
I s~
11 2 N- Pt - Cl \
NH
I Li
Nll 2
0 Lithiun1
Ctsplattn Saccharin
•!• Rational approaches to lead discovery based on
traditional medicine:-
• Rational approaches have become the major route of Jea d discovery.
• The first step is to identify the cause of disease state .
, Many diseases arise from:
• Imbalance of particular chemicals in the body.
• Invasion of foreign organism.
• Abnormal cell growth .
, The effect of imbalance can be corrected by:-
• Antagonism or agonism of a receptor.
• Inhibition of particular enzyme
• Inhibition of enzymes of foreign organism .
• Interference with biosynthesis of DNA.
• Inhibition of abnormal cell growth .
• Lead compound were obtained from the following sources.
i. Plant:-
• Morphine is a pain 1nedication of the opiate family that is found naturally
in a number of plants and animals.
• In 1805, morphine was first isolated from opium by Sertumer
(German pharmacist)
• Schaumann first identified and recognized the presence of a
quaternary carbon aton1 in the morphine molecule, in the field of drug
design of narcotic analgesics.
• Intensive research further led to the evolution of Pethidine
(meperidine) which incidentally combines both the properties of
morphine and atropine.
HO
Morphine Pethidine
• Ehrhardt suggested a general formul a relevant to the analgesic activity
in 1919 as below:
0
I
X-C- CO R
•
'
Ar
Where, Ar is aromatic ring and X is basic side chain and carbonyl
function in the form of ester, ketone or an amide. Later on general
fornntla is modified as follows:
COR Cf I
I / 3
C-(CH 2 )n-N,
CH 3
~ I
~
0
/ \N-CH2
\.._J ci2
C
rf 't)
Methadone Dextromoramid
.Ai--N .Ai--N
X
o=c
I C00H
COOH
Penicillin Cephalosporin
iii. Anhnals:- Epibatidine is obtained from frog skin
N Cl
"=:
Epibatidine
HN
iv. Marine:-
• Laminine is obtained from Laminaria angustata, it is having hypotensive
activity.
• Ara-C is obtained from Caribben sponge, which is having anticancer
activity.
HO
Ara-C
OH OH
Br
NH Br
2-cyno,4,5- dibromoprole
• Aeroplysinine 1s obtained from asparagops1s taxiformis, having
antimicrobial
OCH3
Br Br
OH
Aeroplysinine
•!• Random screening
• Screening refers to the exercise to conducting a biological assay on a
la rge collection of contpounds to identify those compound s that have
the desired activity.
• Initially, these compounds may bind weakly to the target and are known
as the hits. Hit can be considered as predecessor to leads.
• It includes screening of all new chemical entities obtained from natural
source or synthetic chemical libraries for multiple targets.
• This method requires huge cost and time, but new structures with
unexpected and unknown activity can be explored.
• This type of screening is applicable when the receptor is unknown, and the
availability of High Throughput Screening (HTS), large ligand libraries
could be screened.
• Examples for drugs discovered through random screening - streptomycin,
tetracycline.
► Fragment based screening:-
• To identify simple molecules (fragments) possessing typically modest
affinity for a target, with the intent of connecting two or more of these
fragments to create a useful lead compound. EXAMPLE (X-ray
crystallography or NMR spectrometry)
► Computational approaches:-
• The structure of several lmown ligands, computational approaches may be
used to design potential lead compounds.
• The screening of organisms became very popular after the discovery of
penicillin.
Q
OC
,.-()
~I
CH 2
I '/ '/
OH
tt! CH1 N :-.._
~
o=c
0
CH2 CH2
I H3 C
OH
H
' c\
c.,,, Terfenadlne
Sullndac 3
C:11 3
NH -f_O
j-oH
Cl ....-!! N
Oxazepam
• Cetirizine is the 1netabolite of Hydroxyzine, discovered from metabolic
studies
• Oxazepa111 is the 1netabolite of Diazepam, discovered from metabolic
studies.
•!• Discovery of drug through clinical observation:-
• S0111eti1nes a drug candidate during clinical trials will exhibit more th a n
one pharntacological activity, that is, it may produce a sid e effect. This
contpound, then, can be used as a lead for the secondary activity.
► Exan1ples:-
• Sulpha drug sulphathiazole used specifically for treating typhoid,
lowered blood glucose drastically. This led to the development of
sulfonylureas as oral hypoglycaemic agents
• Sildenafil designed as antianginal drug possess adverse effect as
penile erection, which led to relaunch the drug in treatment of erectile
dysfunction, which was a blockbuster drug.
H 3 C- N
t \N - fl S
\__/ II
0
Sulfa drug
Sildenafil
Cl N
NH-<]
NH
r.I
Clonldlne
--- ---
- CH 2 - - NH- - O- - 5-
- CH = - N= - P= - As =
= ~= = C=
__
-
....
r -
+
= As =
e) Ring equivalents
0 0 0
2. Non-classical Bioisosteres:- They do not obey the stearic and
electronic definition of classical isosteres.
• Non-classical bioisosteres are functional groups with dissimilar valence
electronic configuration.
a) carboxyl (COOH) bioisosteres
- S0 2 NH 2 - CO NHOH - CONHCN
0 CF3 ~
\ ck.NH
\C
'NH II \
d) Halogen isosterism
CJ CN CF3
e) Retroisosterism
0 0
II II
C C
R/ 'o ---•► 0 / ' R
I I J
R1 R
0
HO)l_cH[
CH 2
y
0
9
N
C0 2H
,,/·y\
Glu- Trp - Pro - Arg - Pro - Gln - Ile - Pro
CO 2H
Succtnyl praline Teprotide
• The next step was to introduce a better group the carboxylate ion to
interact with zinc, and it was discovered that a thiol group led to
increased activity. This resulted in captopril, which was the first non-
peptide ACE inhibitor to become commercially available
Development of captopril
,,. CASE STUDY II:- The design of Oxam niquine
• The first stage in the development of oxamniquine was to find a lead
con1pound, and so a study was made of compounds that were against the
parasite. The tricyclic structure lucanthone was chosen.
• It was decided to simplify the structure to see whether the tricyclic
syste111 was really necessary. This gave a compound called mirasan .
CH 3 I C-- H~
L J
NH CH 2
' NH
A CH 3 NHCH 2CH 2 N
\
C,H'. i
HO - CH 2
oxamnlquine s
/ C2Hs CH 3
NHCH 2CH 2N, Lucanthone
C2Hs
Cl
CH 3
Mirasan
• The optimum structure based on these results was structure (l). It has one
asymmetric center and, as one might expect, the activity was must
greater in one enantiomer than it was in the other.
R
I
Asymmetric centre ....
. (N (:
HN N
0 2N X Cl
CH3 Cll 1
Cll 3
1 2 3
The optimum structure (1) and thetricyclic structure (2) and (3)
• The tricydic structures (2) was also constructed. However, some conflicting
results were obtained compared with the previous results for
structures (1).
• Adding a further methyl group to the aromatic ring to give structure (3)
with increased activity. The resulting increase in activity suggests that a
better fitting conformation is obtained for the binding site..
• Compound (3) was t hree times more active than structure (1). However,
structure (1) was chosen rather than 3 based on preliminary toxicity
results, as well as the fact that it was cheaper to synthesize.
• The methyl group on (1) was replaced by a hydroxyl methylene group to
give oxamniquine. The drug was put on the market in 1975.
QN
X_CHz . . . . ._ ....,....NH Y Nll 2
( /J CH 2
HN NH 2
Cll 3 +
CH2 CH
( NY
_it ' s~ zC H;"NH'l( NHCHi
HN S
Thiaburtmamide
• cyanoguanidine (X-N-CN; cimetidine, Tagamet) and nitroguanidine (X=N-
NO,) were synthesized. They both were potent H, receptor antagonists,
comparable in potency to metiamide, but without granulocytopenia
( cimetidine was slightly more potent than, X=NO).
CH 2
# NX I ' s.,CH 2 ' ....,. NH NHCH
\ /J CH 2 ~ 3
HN II
CH 3 X