Application of Automated Corrosion Sensors For Monitoring The Rate of Corrosion During Accelerated Corrosion Tests
Application of Automated Corrosion Sensors For Monitoring The Rate of Corrosion During Accelerated Corrosion Tests
201206655 1
www.matcorr.com wileyonlinelibrary.com ß 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
2 Prosek, Le Bozec and Thierry Materials and Corrosion 2012, 63, No. 9999
2.1 AirCorr corrosion loggers Among accelerated corrosion tests that are used by the
automotive makers, the so-called N-VDA test was selected to
The concept of the applied corrosion monitoring system is
simple: the electronic unit measures and registers the change
over time of ER of a thin metal track applied on an insulating
substrate. If the metal corrodes, the cross-sectional area of the
track decreases and the ER increases. A part of the metal track is
protected by an organic coating or tape and, thus, serves as a
reference to compensate for resistivity changes due to varying
temperature. A schematic drawing and photograph of the sensor
is shown in Fig. 1. This geometry ensures high sensitivity to
changes in the ER due to metal corrosion.
The corrosion depth (CD) of the metallic sensor is calculated
according to equation
Rref ;init Rref
CD ¼ tinit (1)
Rsens;init Rsens
where tinit is the initial thickness of the reference metallic track, Figure 2. Photograph of watertight AirCorr O logger with mounted
which is assumed equal to the sensor track in the beginning of Fe-250 mm sensor for heavy corrosive environments
Table 1. Changes in CD in sub-cycles of N-VDA measured with Zn-25 mm sensors (in mm)
B1 A1 C A2 B2 B3 A3
The CD measured in three complete cycles L1/C1, L2/C1, Anyway, it can be concluded that the two measurement
and L1/C2 was 3.6, 3.4, and 3.3 mm, respectively. It gives the techniques gave comparable results.
average CD of 3.4 0.1 mm. The relative standard deviation of Changes in CD per sub-cycle are given in Table 1. It is evident
4% shows a very good reproducibility of the measurement. The that the most corrosive phases were sub-cycles A comprising the
obtained CD can be compared to the total mean zinc CD surface contamination with a solution of 1 wt% sodium chloride
estimated from mass loss of zinc coupons exposed in the test for in a form of salt spray. The average increase in CD recorded in
6 weeks. It was 16.3 2.4 mm, which corresponds to 2.7 mm/ sub-cycles A in the 2nd and 3rd cycle of N-VDA (C2, C3) was
week if a constant rate of the corrosion process is expected from 0.8 0.1 mm. It was significantly lower in sub-cycles B and C, i.e.
cycle 1 to cycle 6. The sensors showed 27% higher CD than 0.1 0.1 mm. Although a part of sub-cycle C is a freezing phase,
coupons. It is not surprising because the ER technique measures the sub-cycles B and C were similar in terms of the corrosivity
in its principle a maximal depth of attack, whereas the coupon towards zinc.
technique assesses an average depth. The maximal depth of The sub-cycles can be analyzed separately in detail as it is
corrosion is important from the practical point of view and shown below for B1 and A1. CD, temperature and relative
often followed as the main parameter defining corrosion humidity records from the first B-sub-cycle, B1, are seen in Fig. 5.
degradation of automotive materials [21, 24, 25]. In reality, the The relative humidity and temperature records are from the 1st
difference between the coupon and ER measurements is probably cycle C1. There was no principal difference between the RH and
even smaller due to the fact that the corrosion rate of zinc usually T-values measured in week cycles C1, C2, and C3. Corrosion of
tends to somewhat decrease in time due to a weak inhibiting zinc initiated within less than an hour after the start of the test.
effect of formed corrosion products and the CD in the initial The initial layer of corrosion products formed by corroding
cycles was thus probably higher than that calculated as 1/6 of the 0.2 mm of zinc at 25 8C and at 70% RH. In two cases, further
total in 6 weeks. Further difference in corrosion properties of bulk activation was observed when the temperature reached 40 8C at
and thin film materials may come from different metallurgy. the same RH.
Figure 5. CD, temperature, and relative humidity measurements in Figure 6. CD, temperature, and relative humidity measurements in
sub-cycle B1 with Zn-25 mm sensors sub-cycle A1 with Zn-25 mm sensors; dashed line show desired RH
T [8C] RH [%] 1 2 3
A similar record for sub-cycle A1 is seen in Fig. 6. The steel did not initiate immediately. It took most of the first sub-
corrosion rate increased immediately after the application of cycle of 24 h to initiate the corrosion process, even when it was the
sodium chloride solution by spraying. During the salt spray sub-cycle A with the salt spray phase in L1. Consequently, the first
phase, it kept at 0.11 0.01 mm/h in sub-cycles A1, A2, and A3 on and second cycle C1 and C2 in L1 differed in total CD. It was 51
pre-corroded surfaces. Thus, the process was reproducible. The and 81 mm, respectively. CD measured in the first week in L1 and
corrosion rate only decreased slightly in the following phase when L2 differing in the order of sub-cycles was however identical,
the temperature increased from 35 to 50 8C. It dropped when the 51 mm.
relative humidity got below about 75% (ranging from 78 to 71% The CD measured using the automated sensors can be
for particular cycles and sensors). It was relatively low in the rest compared to that calculated from mass loss of carbon steel
of the sub-cycle. coupons. They were exposed for 1 and for 6 weeks in L2. The
Corrosion rates of zinc were extracted from the changes in mean CD was 32 3 and 254 21 mm, respectively. When the
CD in periods when both temperature and relative humidity were depth obtained in 6 weeks is recalculated to 1 week, it gives
constant. They are given in Table 2. Obviously, there is a tendency 42 4 mm. The maximal depth of corrosion attack was measured
to induce a higher corrosion rate at elevated temperatures and on the coupons exposed for 1 week using a micrometer gauge. It
higher relative humidity. However, variations in the corrosion was found to be 80 30 mm. Obviously, the depth measured
rate measured at identical RH and T in sub-cycles A, B, and C can by the sensors was higher than the mean depth calculated from
be observed. For example, the corrosion rate at 50 8C and at 90% the mass loss and within the maximal depth measured using a
RH was 0.016 0.004, 0.009 0.002 and 0.003 mm/h in the gauge.
respective sub-cycles. This emphasizes the fact that the rate of the CDs recorded in particular sub-cycles in L1 and L2 tests are
corrosion process, taking place on the metal surface under a layer given in Tables 3 and 4. Two principal observations can be made
of corrosion products does not immediately reflect the actual when the data are compared to those obtained for zinc. First,
climatic conditions. In particular, the drying and wetting process there were smaller differences in corrosion rates measured in
can be slow. It may take significantly longer than an hour until particular sub-cycles for steel than for zinc. The average change in
equilibrium is established between the atmosphere and the
corroding system. The actual amount of water, chloride and other
species available at the metal surface that control the surface
chemistry and the corrosion process was besides the actual
climatic and pollution characteristics affected also by the
exposure history.
Figure 9. CD, temperature, and relative humidity measurements in Figure 10. CD, temperature, and relative humidity measurements in
sub-cycles A with Fe-250 mm sensors; dashed line show desired RH sub-cycles B with Fe-250 mm sensors; dashed line show desired RH
CD in sub-cycles A, B, and C was 13 5, 8 3 and 4 3 mm. products on steel contain both Fe2þ and Fe3þ species, which
Thus, the most corrosive sub-cycle A caused about 3-fold larger makes the system less dependent on the actual availability of
increase in the CD than the least corrosive sub-cycle C and the oxygen on the surface. Fe3þ species can reduce to Fe2þ replacing
difference to sub-cycle B was of only 40%. For zinc, 6-fold thus oxygen in the depolarization reaction [26].
difference was observed between sub-cycles A and both B and C. Changes in CD and relative humidity and temperature
Second, the corrosivity in particular sub-cycles of the same type records for sub-cycle A are plotted in Fig. 9. Corrosion rates in
varied according to their order. For example, the first, second and periods characterized by constant RH and temperature are given
third sub-cycle B in L1/C1 gave changes in the CD with the in Table 5. Excluded are first A-sub-cycles for L1/C1 and L2/C1
standard deviation of 40%. Both these observations indicate that where lower CDs were measured due to incomplete activation of
the atmospheric corrosion of carbon steel was even less sensitive the surface. The corrosion rate was about 0.4 mm/h in the salt
to actual bulk climatic conditions than that of zinc under spray phase at 35 8C. It increased sharply during a drying phase at
conditions of this study. The strong hysteresis of the corroding 50 8C when the relative humidity dropped under about 83–87%. A
system is expected to be due to slow changes in the conditions at corrosion rate of about 2 mm/h was registered. It decreased when
the metal/corrosion product interface. Both the drying of RH reached 73–76%. Thus, the maximal corrosion rate of steel
corrosion products and transport of activators towards and from was found after the salt spray cycle at the elevated temperature of
the interface are slow processes. In addition, the corrosion 50 8C and the relative humidity between 75 and 85%. At around
80% RH, the surface is covered with a thin and continuous layer
of water solution that enables for efficient transport of oxygen and
Table 3. Changes in CD in sub-cycles of N-VDA in modification L1
measured with Fe-250 mm sensor (in mm)
Cycle Sub-cyclea Table 5. Corrosion rate of carbon steel measured in periods with
constant T and RH (in mm/h); average values for sensors with a
A1 B1 A2 C1 A3 B2 B3 Full cycle developed layers of corrosion products
met in service conditions and tests with permanently high Framework Programme, contract number 226539. All members
wetness generally fail to predict zinc performance in field. of the project team are thanked for their contribution. Fréderic
Although further analyses are necessary to complete the study, Ledan is thanked for valuable experimental support.
the available data indicate that the N-VDA test might correctly
simulate real exposure conditions and provide reasonable
prediction of the performance of galvanized materials. 5 References
For both carbon steel and zinc, changes in the corrosion rate
were often detected when the relative humidity dropped below or [1] L. Sjögren, On-line corrosion monitoring of environments
increased above about 75%. It well corresponds to the for electronic equipment, Report 2002:2, Swedish Corrosion
deliquescence point of sodium chloride, which is 75–76% in Institute, Stockholm, Sweden 2002.
the given temperature interval [29–31]. The deliquescence point is [2] ASTM B 808-97, Standard test method for monitoring of
the relative humidity when sodium chloride forms saturated atmospheric corrosion chambers by quartz crystal micro-
solution in equilibrium to humid air. Below this threshold level, balances, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, USA
sodium chloride is solid and thus most chloride ions are removed 2003.
from the system. Diluted solution forms above the deliquescence [3] S. Zakipour, C. Leygraf, Br. Corros. J. 1992, 27, 295.
point with a lower chloride concentration and higher film [4] M. Forslund, C. Leygraf, J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, 113.
thickness. [5] L. Falat, US patent 5 411 890, (1995).
The automated corrosion logger appears to be an interesting [6] O. Baltzersen, A. Solstad, A. Daaland, J. K. Holberg, NDTnet
device for understanding the effect of technical phases (salt 2005, 10.
contamination, level of temperature or relative humidity, duration [7] M. Ström, G. Ström, G. Strannhage, presented at EURO-
of each phase, variation between temperature and relative CORR 2006, Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 25–28,
humidity, etc.) in accelerated corrosion tests, which may help 2006.
in the development of such tests. [8] G. Rannou, D. Thierry, N. Le Bozec, presented at COR-
ROSION 2010, NACE, San Antonio, USA, March 14–18,
2010, Paper 10170
[9] ASTM G96, Standard Guide for On-Line Monitoring of
4 Conclusions Corrosion in Plant Equipment (Electrical and Electrochemi-
cal Methods), West Conshohocken, USA: ASTM Inter-
An automated corrosion logger allowing for real-time measure- national 2008.
ments of carbon steel and zinc corrosion rate was used in a cyclic [10] ISO 11844-2, Corrosion of metals and alloys – classification
accelerated corrosion test, N-VDA cycle. This test was selected as of low corrosivity of indoor atmospheres – Part 2: Determi-
it offers the advantage of alternating salt spray and wet and dry nation of corrosion attack in indoor atmospheres, Inter-
cycles at temperatures from 15 up to 50 8C. national Organization of Standardization, Genève, Suisse,
From the results, the following conclusions may be 2005.
drawn: [11] Automated corrosion sensors as on-line real time process
control tools (CORRLOG), Co-operative Research Project,
The ER technique proved to be a very sensitive tool for studying 6th Framework Programme, Contract No. 0182 07, 09/2005-
the corrosion kinetics of the metals. It was possible to follow 02/2008.
changes in the corrosion rate in order of nanometers per hour. [12] Protection of cultural heritage by real-time corrosion monitor-
The obtained results were well reproducible and comparable to ing (MUSECORR), Collaborative Project, 7th Framework
mass loss measured by metal coupons. Programme, Contract No. 2265 39, 06/2009-05/2012.
The actual corrosion rate was not fully reflecting climatic [13] www.musecorr.eu, accessed 22/03/2012.
conditions in the test chamber. It was affected by the exposure [14] T. Prosek, F. Dubois, M. Kouril, B. Scheffel, Y. Degres,
history due to limited rates of wetting/drying and oxygen and M. Jouannic, M. Taube, M. Dubus, V. Hubert, D. Thierry,
ion transport to the reaction interface under a layer of corrosion presented at 18th ICC, Perth, Australia, November 20–24,
products. The hysteresis was particularly strong for carbon 2011, Paper 436.
steel. Except the freezing phase, the steel corrosion rate varied [15] M. Dubus, M. Kouril, T.-P. Nguyen, T. Prosek, M. Saheb,
J. Tate, Stud. Conserv. 2010, 55, 121.
in a narrow range from 0.2 to 0.6 mm/h.
[16] L. Vaissière, M. Ragazzini, G. Despert, N. Le Bozec,
For zinc, 75% of the metal corroded in the salt spray phase and
D. Thierry, presented at EUROCORR 2011, Stockholm,
during following drying period while it represented only 13%
Sweden, September 4–8, 2011, Paper 4631.
of the total test time. The corrosion rate varied from 0.001 to [17] N. Le Bozec, D. Thierry, P. Le Calvé, J.-P. Pautasso, presented
0.1 mm/h in particular phases of the cycle. at EUROCORR 2011, Stockholm, Sweden, September 4–8,
During drying phases, the corrosion rate usually dropped when 2011, Paper 4629.
the relative humidity decreased below about 75%, i.e. close to [18] T. Prosek, M. Kouril, L. R. Hilbert, Y. Degres, V. Blazek,
the deliquescence point of sodium chloride. D. Thierry, M. Ø. Hansen, Corros. Eng. Sci. Tech. 2008, 43,
129.
[19] T. Prosek, D. Thierry, M. Kouril, Y. Degres, presented
Acknowledgements: We gratefully acknowledge the financial at CORROSION 2008, NACE, New Orleans, USA,
support by the European Commission under the Seventh March 16–20, 2008, Paper 08296.
[20] F. Beier, K.-H. Stellnbberger, S. Geisler, presented at EURO- [25] N. Le Bozec, A. Le Gac, D. Thierry, Mater. Corros. 2012, 63,
CORR 2009, Nice, France, September 6–10, 2009, Paper 408.
8412. [26] M. Stratmann, K. Hoffmann, Corros. Sci. 1989, 29,
[21] N. Le Bozec, N. Blandin, D. Thierry, Mater. Corros. 2008, 59, 1329.
889. [27] M. Stratmann, K. Bohnenkamp, T. Ramchandran, Corrros.
[22] N. Le Bozec, A. Legac, D. Thierry, presented at 4th Inter- Sci. 1987, 27, 905.
national Seminar in the field of Automotive Corrosion, Stock- [28] T. Prosek, D. Thierry, C. Taxén, J. Maixner, Corros. Sci. 2007,
holm, Sweden, May 5–6, 2010. 49, 2676.
[23] B. Rendhal, N. Le Bozec, presented at Eurocorr, Nice, France, [29] T. Prosek, A. Iversen, C. Taxén, D. Thierry, Corrosion 2009,
September 6–10, 2009, Paper 8395. 65, 105.
[24] T. Prosek, N. Larché, M. Vlot, F. Goodwin, D. Thierry, Mater. [30] A. Apelblat, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 1993, 25, 63.
Corros. 2010, 60, 412. [31] L. Greenspan, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 1977, 81A, 89.