Adaptive Pulse Width Control and Sampling For Low Power Pulse Oximetry
Adaptive Pulse Width Control and Sampling For Low Power Pulse Oximetry
2, APRIL 2015
Abstract—Remote sensing of physiological parameters could be time-to-digital converter (TDC) and perform design-space anal-
a cost effective approach to improving health care, and low-power ysis to optimize the circuit parameters. Second, we describe a
sensors are essential for remote sensing because these sensors are technique to estimate SNR of the captured photoplethysmogram
often energy constrained. This paper presents a power optimized
photoplethysmographic sensor interface to sense arterial oxygen and use this information to dynamically adjust the LED on-time.
saturation, a technique to dynamically trade off SNR for power This reduces power consumption by operating the sensor at just
during sensor operation, and a simple algorithm to choose when sufficient SNR. Third, we propose a simple algorithm that re-
to acquire samples in photoplethysmography. A prototype of duces the number of samples required, thereby reducing power
the proposed pulse oximeter built using commercial-off-the-shelf consumption. Finally, we evaluate power benefit of the pro-
(COTS) components is tested on 10 adults. The dynamic adapta-
tion techniques described reduce power consumption considerably posed dynamic adaptation techniques.
compared to our reference implementation, and our approach is There have been numerous efforts in the past to reduce power
competitive to state-of-the-art implementations. The techniques consumption in pulse oximetry. A photodiode structure that
presented in this paper may be applied to low-power sensor lowers power consumption in the photodiode interface circuit is
interface designs where acquiring samples is expensive in terms of proposed in [15] and a method to optimally size the photodiode
power as epitomized by pulse oximetry.
is described in [16]. Our work, however, is about designing a
Index Terms—Design-space analysis, low-power, pulse oximetry, low-power interface circuit for a given photodiode. The authors
SpO2, tracking-loop. in [17], [18] argue that low power analog circuits are suitable
for sensing physiological parameters. A recently proposed
photodiode interface circuit targeted to pulse oximetry uses
energy efficient transimpedance amplifiers and is a completely
I. INTRODUCTION analog design [19]. In contrast, the photodiode interface we
propose is more digital in nature and employs a time-to-digital
I NFANT mortality in rural India is substantially higher than converter (TDC). A switched integrator has been used in [20]
in the developed world [1]. The Remote Neonatal Intensive to reduce noise. Our work complements this design to further
Care Unit (RNICU) Project aims to provide affordable health reduce power consumption. Although our implementation is
care in rural areas by monitoring various physiological param- similar, it differs in subtle ways. The idea of dynamically
eters of neonates, remotely [2]. To remotely monitor physio- reducing power consumption based on the characteristics of
logical parameters, it is desirable to have sensor nodes that are the acquired plethysmogram has been claimed in [21]. We
small and discreet, and the battery powering those nodes would propose a way of accomplishing this and measure the power
therefore be of limited capacity. To reduce the frequency of bat- conserved. In [22], compressive sensing is used to minimize
tery replacement, a sensor node that consumes as little power as power consumption by reducing the number of samples ac-
possible has to be designed. quired. However, existing photodiode interface circuits use
Arterial oxygen saturation is an important physiological pa- analog band pass filters that do not easily permit sub-Nyquist
rameter in modern medicine [3]. Pulse oximeters are commonly sparse random sampling, which is necessary for compressive
used in intensive care units, sleep studies, neonatal care etc. sensing to effectively reduce power. Our work addresses this
[3]–[6]. Low-power pulse oximeters are useful for remotely issue, and the proposed architecture can acquire samples at
monitoring heart rate and oxygen saturation [7]–[14]. arbitrary time instants. A trade-off between noise performance
In this paper, we present a novel low-power pulse oximeter. required of the photodetector circuit and the duration for which
First, we propose a photocurrent detector architecture that uses a the LED is turned on for each measurement is shown in [23],
[24]. We extend this by proposing a power model for opamps
in terms of their noise performance. Using this, we optimize
Manuscript received October 04, 2013; revised January 15, 2014 and April
10, 2014; accepted May 12, 2014. Date of publication June 30, 2014; date of the trade-off between burning power in the LED versus the
current version April 29, 2015. This work was supported by DeitY, MCIT, Gov- front-end amplifier.
ernment of India and the Robert Bosch Centre for Cyber-Physical Systems. This
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. First, we briefly
paper was recommended by Associate Editor A. Demosthenous.
The authors are with the Department of Electrical and Communication review the principle behind pulse oximetry. We then present the
Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka 560012, India proposed photodetector architecture. Next, we describe how it
(e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]).
is optimized for power. Section 4 presents a technique that dy-
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. namically lowers the duration for which the LED is turned on,
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TBCAS.2014.2326712 and proposes a simple algorithm that further decreases power
1932-4545 © 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GUBBI AND AMRUTUR: ADAPTIVE PULSE WIDTH CONTROL AND SAMPLING FOR LOW POWER PULSE OXIMETRY 273
II. BACKGROUND
Oxygen saturation is the percentage of haemoglobin in the
Fig. 2. The red and IR LEDs are alternately flashed once every 5 ms, and for
blood that is oxygenated. If is the concentration of de-oxy- each photocurrent measurement the LED is kept on for a duration whose
genated haemoglobin in the blood and is the concentra- precise value depends on the photocurrent at that time.
tion of oxygenated haemoglobin, then
A. Proposed Architecture
Pulse oximetry is an optical technique to measure arterial
oxygen saturation which takes advantage of volumetric pulsa- The receiver circuit we propose is shown in Fig. 1. To acquire
tions in the arteries as the heart pumps blood. Light from an a sample, the analog circuitry and the TDC are powered up, one
LED is transmitted through a body part, usually a finger or an of the LEDs is turned ON, and the switch S1 is opened. The
ear lobe, and the intensity of the light that passes through to the first stage is a current integrator which converts the photocur-
other side is measured using a photodiode. From [3], the nor- rent to a voltage ramp. The amplified ramp is then thresholded
malized absorption ratio R is calculated as against two voltage references. Finally, a time-to-digital con-
verter (TDC) measures the difference between the times when
the amplified ramp hits the two reference voltages. After the
(2) measurement is recorded, the LED, the entire analog circuitry,
and the TDC are powered down to save power. Fig. 2 shows this
where the perfusion is the ratio of AC to DC of the corre- process and Fig. 3 illustrates the output we expect from the TDC
sponding plethysmogram for red and infra-red wavelengths for one of the channels (red or IR). It is a discrete time wave-
form with samples separated by 10 ms. To acquire each sample,
the switched integrator in Fig. 1 accumulates photocurrent for
(3) a duration that typically lasts a few hundred microseconds, and
the measurement made by the TDC is recorded. As illustrated in
Fig. 3, the recorded plethysmogram has a large DC component
Here, is the received photocurrent. Substituting absorp- and a small AC component .
tion coefficient values from [3] gives Suppose that the circuit starts to acquire a sample at .
The output of the first stage is
% (4)
(6)
In practice however, is assumed to be a linear function
of as in
where is the photocurrent. This is amplified by the second
stage to give
(5)
Fig. 4. Noise in the ramp is reflected as jitter in the output of the TDC.
(but the two reference voltages are held fixed). This allows
a control algorithm to analyze the acquired photoplethysmo-
gram and adjust the gain, A, to dynamically trade-off SNR
for measurement duration [(11) and (8)]. This reduces the
power consumption since measurement duration determines
the percentage of time for which the LED and the circuitry are
Fig. 3. Illustration of the output of the TDC. The samples in this discrete powered.
time waveform are separated by 10 ms. The heart rate is exaggerated in this
illustration. In the proposed circuit, the amplified ramp is thresholded
against two references, and the difference between the times
when the ramp crosses these two references is measured. This
where A is the gain of the second stage. After thresholding, the suppresses the effect of 1/f noise in the integrator stage, which
TDC measures can be severe because of the very low signal frequency involved
(0.5–6 Hz). This is similar to correlated double sampling [26].
However, only the 1/f noise from the amplifiers (and not due
(8) to the comparator) is suppressed. Comparator 1/f noise has a
smaller effect on SNR because the signal would have under-
where . and are the instants when gone substantial amplification before reaching the comparator.
crosses and respectively. Thus, is inversely pro- Furthermore, since the power supply to the entire analog circuit
portional to the photocurrent [25]. It can be shown that (Ap- is duty cycled, 1/f noise gets further suppressed [27]. Moreover,
pendix A) the perfusion is TDC measurements at the peak and trough are subtracted to ob-
tain , which suppresses comparator 1/f noise below the
heart rate.
(9) Another aspect of the proposed circuit is that the LED cur-
rent is fixed so as to enable the LEDs to always operate at their
Even if the photocurrent is a constant, the output of the highest efficiency (luminosity per unit current). This is in con-
TDC will exhibit variance due to noise. This is illustrated in trast to implementations such as [19], [28], and [20], that con-
Fig. 4. To quantify the effect of noise, we define signal-to-noise trol the current so that the DC value of the red and IR photo-
ratio (SNR) of the acquired plethysmogram as follows [23]. plethysmogram are equal to some pre-determined value. By op-
erating each LED at its maximum efficiency point and control-
ling only the duty cycle, we not only save power but also elim-
(10)
inate one more amplifier that would have otherwise been used
to control the LED current. Finally, the proposed circuit uses a
where is the standard deviation of the jitter in the output of
time-to-digital converter (TDC) as opposed to an ADC. This is
the TDC due to noise. It can be shown (Appendix B) that
because it is relatively easier to obtain large dynamic range in
TDCs in contrast to ADCs, particularly as the supply voltage
shrinks.
To deal with low perfusion, current oximeter implementa-
tions use AC coupled amplifiers to separate the large DC level
(11) from the AC signal. Only the amplified AC signal is fed to the
ADC to make the best use of its dynamic range [20], [28]. How-
where is the noise gain of the first stage, ever, the use of AC coupled amplifiers and low pass filters in
is the input referred noise spectral density of the opamp the pipeline, as illustrated in Fig. 5, make the process of turning
used for the switched integrator, is its ON the LED and sparsely sampling the photocurrent at arbi-
noise bandwidth and its unity gain bandwidth, and trary time instants harder to implement. This is because (a) low
is the photocurrent noise spectral density. pass filters do not allow the plethysmogram to change rapidly
We employ a switched integrator front-end because it gives as would happen if the LED is turned ON at arbitrary time in-
a simple way to control the duration of photocurrent measure- stants, and (b) it is difficult to build a sample-and-hold circuit
ment. The gain of the second stage can be digitally controlled that droops voltage by no more than a few hundred microvolts
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GUBBI AND AMRUTUR: ADAPTIVE PULSE WIDTH CONTROL AND SAMPLING FOR LOW POWER PULSE OXIMETRY 275
over the duration when samples are not taken (on the order of
one second). Such a sample-and-hold circuit will need a large Fig. 6. Illustration of the non-ideal switched integrator output.
capacitor as well as additional circuitry to isolate it from other
amplifiers whose power supply is being duty cycled. These are
undesirable in both integrated and discrete implementations. the first stage is considered, and the second stage is assumed to
TDCs solve this problem by offering very large dynamic have unity gain. We also assume that and are fixed and
range, thereby permitting the photocurrent to be digitized explain later how we choose and .
directly without having to separate the AC signal from the DC. 1) Gain: If the desired average duration for turning on the
For example, a 22-bit TDC with a resolution of 110 ps was LED to acquire a sample is , the integration capacitor,
demonstrated in [29]. With such a large dynamic range, even , is set to be
under low perfusion, quantization noise is sufficiently small.
Furthermore, because the samples are separated by a relatively
large interval of 5 ms, some TDC architectures such as Vernier (12)
TDCs may comfortably take more time than the sampling
duration to resolve the time difference. This sets the noise gain at . At this point,
On the flip side, the noise bandwidth in Fig. 1 is the full circuit the value of at which the total power consumption will
bandwidth, whereas the noise bandwidth in Fig. 5 is limited to be minimized is not known. This will be the subject of a subse-
the signal bandwidth,1 which is usually about 6 Hz. The excess quent section.
noise bandwidth is the price for the ability to sample at arbitrary 2) Bandwidth: The output of the switched integrator, in
time instants and to power down the entire circuit between sam- Fig. 1, will not be a perfect ramp because the bandwidth of the
ples. opamp is limited (see Fig. 6). We choose the minimum band-
Having decided on the architecture, we proceed to select the width that keeps non-linearity below the acceptable level. In
parameters of the amplifiers in Fig. 1. In selecting the gain, order to do this, it can be shown that the opamp bandwidth has
bandwidth, and noise performance of the amplifier, a trade-off to satisfy
presents itself. The higher the gain-bandwidth and lower the
input referred noise level of the amplifier, the larger will be its
bias current and lower will be the necessary measurement dura- (13)
tion to achieve a target SNR leading to smaller power burnt in
the LED (because it can be shut off sooner). Conversely, using
an amplifier with smaller gain-bandwidth and poorer noise per- where is the minimum SNR necessary to make suffi-
formance will lead to lower power burnt in the amplifier. How- ciently accurate calculations [23], is
ever, the duration of measurement will now have to be longer to the noise bandwidth, and is the unity gain bandwidth. This
achieve the desired SNR, which means that more power is burnt equation has to be solved iteratively to find the minimum accept-
in powering the LED while the photocurrent is being measured. able bandwidth for a given . Equation (13) indicates that
To optimally select the parameters of the amplifier, we develop as is increased, the required bandwidth reduces.
a power model for opamps in terms of bandwidth and noise per- 3) Input Referred Noise: Referring the jitter in the output of
formance. We then perform design-space analysis. the TDC back to the input of the opamp [30], the max-
imum permissible input referred noise spectral density of the
B. Interface Circuit Design opamp (above which the SNR of the acquired plethysmogram
will become lower than ) can be shown to be
The photocurrent , perfusion , photodiode capac-
itance , and photocurrent noise spectral density are
known. We design the circuit parameters , and , and
also the gain, bandwidth, and input referred noise levels of
the opamps in Fig. 1. These parameters are chosen so that the
(14)
total power consumption of the LED and the interface circuit
is minimized. For the following analysis, only the noise from Equation (14) (derived in Appendix B) shows that as
1High frequency noise in the circuit before the sample-and-hold (S/H) stage
is increased, the input referred noise requirement gets relaxed.
aliases into the signal band. This results in higher noise than if the LED was 4) Reference Voltages: It is desirable to choose and
kept continuously ON without the S/H stage. that are as high as possible within the input common mode range
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
276 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2015
(15)
Fig. 8. Scatterplot of supply current versus bandwidth per input referred noise
(16) for discrete opamps. One outlier was ignored during fitting and is not shown in
this plot.
err on the side of higher LED on-time since the slope is much
lower when the LED power dominates. The optimal on-time
for the probe we used corresponds to 237 s, which requires
a gain of 106, closed-loop bandwidth of 1 MHz, and an input
referred noise of . In our COTS implementation, the
TDC has a resolution of 62.5 ns, and ensuring that the SNR with
TDC quantization noise2 considered is above 100 resulted in the
on-time being 416 s. This requires a gain of 61, closed-loop
bandwidth of 0.6 MHz, and an input referred noise of 4.47
. Furthermore, the model used does not account for
noise from resistors, voltage references, photocurrent noise due
to ambient light etc. Because the trade-off curve is much less
sharper at higher on-times, it is safer to choose an on-time that Fig. 9. Trade-off between amplifier power and LED power.
is higher than optimal. Thus, the first stage is chosen to have
noise gain of 11 with unity gain bandwidth of 3 MHz, and the
second stage to have a gain adjustable in the range 1 to 10 with
a unity gain bandwidth of 3 MHz.
TABLE II
COMPONENTS USED IN THE PROTOTYPE
TABLE III
COMPARISON OF POWER CONSUMPTION
samples is expensive in terms of power because of the need where is the photodiode noise current and is the voltage
to light an LED during sampling. Design-space analysis was noise due to the opamp voltage noise. Substituting and
performed to explore the trade-off between spending power in and subtracting
the LED and burning power in a higher performance amplifier.
However, designing for the worst-case results in excessive
power consumption in most situations. We showed that dy-
namic adaptation techniques lower power considerably by
operating the sensor at the edge of the SNR requirement and (26)
acquiring samples only when necessary.
Substituting from (8)
APPENDIX A
PERFUSION IN TERMS OF TDC MEASUREMENTS (27)
(20)
(28)
(21)
Since the photodiode noise and opamp noise are uncorrelated,
where and correspond to the peak and the chain rule for expectations can be used to obtain
trough of the photocurrent (see Fig. 3). Thus
(22)
(29)
where is and is
(30)
. From (22) and (23), the perfusion
P is Since and ,
(24)
(31)
APPENDIX B
NOISE ANALYSIS OF THE PHOTODIODE INTERFACE CIRCUIT (32)
In this section, we analyze the noise performance of the
switched integrator and derive (14). The ramp that is fed to the Re-arranging terms in (31), using (10), and setting
comparator may be written as
(25)
(33)
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
282 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2015
From (8) and (12) [12] N. Watthanawisuth, T. Lomas, A. Wisitsoraat, and A. Tuantranont,
“Wireless wearable pulse oximeter for health monitoring using
zigbee wireless sensor network,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Electrical Engi-
(34) neering/Electronics Computer Telecommunications and Information
Technology, 2010, pp. 575–579.
[13] T. Torfs, V. Leonov, C. Van Hoof, and B. Gyselinckx, “Body-heat pow-
Substituting this into (33) and using (9), the maximum per- ered autonomous pulse oximeter,” in Proc. 5th IEEE Conf. Sensors,
missible input referred noise spectral density is 2006, pp. 427–430.
[14] Y. Mendelson, R. J. Duckworth, and G. Comtois, “A wearable re-
flectance pulse oximeter for remote physiological monitoring,” in Proc.
28th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Soc.,
2006, pp. 912–915.
[15] R. Haahr, S. Duun, K. Birkelund, P. Raahauge, P. Petersen, H. Dam, L.
Norgaard, and E. Thomsen, “A novel photodiode for reflectance pulse
oximetry in low-power applications,” in Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Conf.
(35) IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Soc., 2007, pp. 2350–2353.
[16] C. Pujary, M. Savage, and Y. Mendelson, “Photodetector size consid-
erations in the design of a noninvasive reflectance pulse oximeter for
telemedicine applications,” in Proc. 29th IEEE Annu. Bioengineering
ACKNOWLEDGMENT Conf., 2003, pp. 148–149.
[17] R. Sarpeshkar, “Ultra low power electronics for medicine,” in Proc. Int.
The authors would like to thank Manikandan, Viveka, and Workshop Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2006, p.
1, pp. -37.
Pushkar for their suggestions and Hitesh for assisting with the [18] L. Turicchia, S. Mandal, M. Tavakoli, L. Fay, V. Misra, J. Bohorquez,
CC2540 platform. They also thank the anonymous reviewers for W. Sanchez, and R. Sarpeshkar, “Ultra-low-power electronics for non-
their comments, and acknowledge the volunteers who partici- invasive medical monitoring,” in Proc. IEEE Custom Integrated Cir-
cuits Conf., 2009, pp. 85–92.
pated in this research. Signed consent was obtained from these [19] M. Tavakoli, L. Turicchia, and R. Sarpeshkar, “An ultra-low-power
volunteers on a less-than-minimum-risk consent form which de- pulse oximeter implemented with an energy-efficient transimpedance
amplifier,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 27–38,
scribed the experiment and informed participants that we would Feb. 2010.
not disclose any personally identifiable data and that their par- [20] K. Glaros and E. Drakakis, “A sub-mW fully-integrated pulse oximeter
ticipation or their refusal to participate in the research at any front-end,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. 7, no. 3, pp.
363–375, Jun. 2013.
point in time would in no way affect their privileges at the in- [21] A. Al-Ali, “Low power pulse oximeter,” U.S. Patent Application 8 457
stitute or their professional relationship with the investigators. 703 B2, 2007.
[22] P. Baheti and H. Garudadri, “An ultra low power pulse oximeter sensor
based on compressed sensing,” in Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Wearable
REFERENCES and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Jun. 2009, pp. 144–148.
[23] E. Pelaez and E. Villegas, “Led power reduction trade-offs for ambula-
[1] D. G. Bassani et al., “Causes of neonatal and child mortality in India: tory pulse oximetry,” in Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Engineering
A nationally representative mortality survey.,” Lancet, vol. 376, no. in Medicine and Biology Soc., 2007, pp. 2296–2299.
9755, p. 1853, 2010. [24] K. Glaros and E. Drakakis, “Trade-offs for low power integrated pulse
[2] H. Rao, D. Saxena, S. Kumar, S. V. Gubbi, B. Amrutur, P. Mony, oximeters,” in Proc. IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conf.,
P. Thankachan, K. Shankar, S. Rao, and S. R. Bhat, “Low power re- 2009, pp. 245–248.
mote neonatal temperature monitoring device,” in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. [25] Precision Switched Integrator Transimpedance Amplifier 2013 [On-
Biomedical Electronics and Systems, 2014. line]. Available: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/ivc102.pdf
[3] J. Webster, Design of Pulse Oximeters. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC [26] C. Enz and G. Temes, “Circuit techniques for reducing the effects of
Press, 1997. op-amp imperfections: Autozeroing, correlated double sampling, and
[4] N. Netzer, A. H. Eliasson, C. Netzer, and D. A. Kristo, “Overnight chopper stabilization,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1584–1614,
pulse oximetry for sleep-disordered breathing in adults: A review,” 1996.
CHEST J., vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 625–633, 2001. [27] E. Klumperink, S. L. J. Gierkink, A. Van Der Wel, and B. Nauta, “Re-
[5] Z. Zhu, R. K. Barnette, K. M. Fussell, R. M. Rodriguez, A. Canonico, ducing mosfet 1/f noise and power consumption by switched biasing,”
and R. W. Light, “Continuous oxygen monitoring: A better way to IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 994–1001, 2000.
prescribe long-term oxygen therapy,” Resp. Med., vol. 99, no. 11, pp. [28] S. Lopez, Application Note 4327, Pulse Oximeter Fundamentals and
1386–1392, 2005. Design 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.freescale.com/files/
[6] A. K. Simonds, “Oximetry feedback flow control simulation for 32bit/doc/app_note/AN4327.pdf
oxygen therapy,” J. Clin. Monit. Comput., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 115–123, [29] J. Guo and S. Sonkusale, “A 22-bit 110 ps time-interpolated time-to-
2007. digital converter,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, 2012,
[7] R. Haahr, S. Duun, M. Toft, B. Belhage, J. Larsen, K. Birkelund, and pp. 3166–3169.
E. Thomsen, “An electronic patch for wearable health monitoring by [30] T. Sepke, P. Holloway, C. Sodini, and H.-S. Lee, “Noise analysis for
reflectance pulse oximetry,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst., vol. comparator-based circuits,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Syst. I, Reg. Pa-
6, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2012. pers, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 541–553, 2009.
[8] F. Adochiei, C. Rotariu, R. Ciobotariu, and H. Costin, “A wireless low- [31] B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. Noida,
power pulse oximetry system for patient telemonitoring,” in Proc. 7th India: Tata McGraw-Hill, 2002.
Int. Symp. Advanced Topics in Electrical Engineering, 2011, pp. 1–4. [32] Data Sheets From Texas Instruments 2013 [Online]. Available:
[9] W.-Y. Chung, Y.-D. Lee, and S.-J. Jung, “A wireless sensor network http://www.ti.com/lsds/ti/amplifiers-linear/operational-ampli-
compatible wearable u-healthcare monitoring system using integrated fier-op-am p-products.page
ecg, accelerometer and spo2,” in Proc. 30th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE En- [33] J. Immerkar, “Fast noise variance estimation,” Comput. Vis. Image Un-
gineering in Medicine and Biology Soc., 2008, pp. 1529–1532. derstand., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 300–302, 1996.
[10] P. Shaltis, S. Rhee, and H. Asada, “Implementation and validation of [34] J. Patterson and G.-Z. Yang, “Ratiometric artifact reduction in low
a power-efficient, high-speed modulation design for wireless oxygen power reflective photoplethysmography,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Cir-
saturation measurement systems,” in Proc. 28th IEEE Annu. Northeast cuits Syst., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 330–338, 2011.
Bioengineering Conf., 2002, pp. 193–194. [35] S. Rhee, B.-H. Yang, and H. Asada, “Artifact-resistant power-efficient
[11] E. Hughes, M. Masilela, P. Eddings, A. Raflq, C. Boanca, and R. Mer- design of finger-ring plethysmographic sensors,” IEEE Trans. Biomed.
rell, “Vmote: A wearable wireless health monitoring system,” in Proc. Eng., vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 795–805, 2001.
9th Int. Conf. E-Health Networking, Application and Services, 2007, [36] B. E. Sueppel and D. W. Mortara, “Low power pulse oximeter,” U. S.
pp. 330–331. Patent 6 697 655, Feb. 24, 2004.
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
GUBBI AND AMRUTUR: ADAPTIVE PULSE WIDTH CONTROL AND SAMPLING FOR LOW POWER PULSE OXIMETRY 283
Sagar Venkatesh Gubbi received the B.E. degree Bharadwaj Amrutur (M'94–SM'13) received the
in electronics and communication from the Sri B.Tech. degree in computer science and engineering
Jayachamarajendra College of Engineering, Mysore, from the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay,
India, and the M.E. degree in electrical and com- India, in 1990, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in
munication engineering from the Indian Institute electrical engineering from Stanford University,
of Science, Bangalore, India, in 2011 and 2013, Stanford, CA, USA, in 1994 and 1999, respectively.
respectively. He worked at Bell Labs, Agilent Labs, and
His research interests include ultra low-power cir- Greenfield Networks. Currently, he is an Associate
cuits and systems. Professor in the Department of Electrical and Com-
munication Engineering, Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore, India, working in the areas of VLSI
circuits and systems.
Authorized licensed use limited to: University of Kerala. Downloaded on April 22,2024 at 12:20:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.