Scribd
Upload
15 views

ARCPP 1 Final Output

The document provides guidelines for a case study assignment evaluating the design strategies, implementation process, and performance of a small public building based on accessibility standards. Students must discuss the building's standards used, execution of design, and assessment methods in a paper following an A4 size, size 12 font, with proper citations and less than 15% plagiarism. The paper is due by June 9th, 2023.

Uploaded by

trave rafols
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views

ARCPP 1 Final Output

The document provides guidelines for a case study assignment evaluating the design strategies, implementation process, and performance of a small public building based on accessibility standards. Students must discuss the building's standards used, execution of design, and assessment methods in a paper following an A4 size, size 12 font, with proper citations and less than 15% plagiarism. The paper is due by June 9th, 2023.

Uploaded by

trave rafols
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ARCPP 1 – Architecture Professional Practice 1

Final Output (Case Study)

Instruction: Choose a SMALL public building/structure and Evaluate their design strategies,
implementation process, and performance outcomes based on BP 344 (Accessibility Law)
standards.

1.0 Introduction
- BP 344
- Building

2.0 Design Strategies

- Standards used in the building in accordance to BP 344.

- Provide pictures

3.0 Implementation Process

- How was it executed or was it executed properly?

- Provide pictures

4.0 Performance outcome

4.1 Discuss what method will used

4.2 Assessment

4.3 Result

Do your paperwork using the following guideline.

- A4 size paper
- Size 12, Calibre
- Proper citation
- 15% max. on plagiarism checker
- Save file as PDF and name file format with complete name (last name, given name)
- Deadline June 9, 2023 (upload work on google drive, link will be sent on GC)
- The Instructor will evaluate research paper using the following criteria:
25% Depth of discussion
20% Integration of knowledge
10% Topic focus
10% Cohesiveness
10% Quality of information/evidence
10% Similarity rating (at most 15%)
10% Citation format
5% Spelling & grammar

You might also like