The document discusses the central role of states in international relations. It outlines how states are defined as sovereign political entities that interact within a global system without a central authority. The document then traces the historical development of modern nation-states and analyzes how states operate within the current complex global context characterized by issues like globalization, governance, and interconnectivity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views
Unit 3
The document discusses the central role of states in international relations. It outlines how states are defined as sovereign political entities that interact within a global system without a central authority. The document then traces the historical development of modern nation-states and analyzes how states operate within the current complex global context characterized by issues like globalization, governance, and interconnectivity.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
UNIT 2- (I)
State and diffusion of authority and power
How is the state central to the idea of international relations? Introduction The states have been seen as ‘unitary actors’ in many standard texts on international relations, and have a primary role to act in the nature and interplay of these relations. The modern nation-state has been defined as a political apparatus with supreme jurisdiction over a demarcated territorial area, backed by a claim to a monopoly of coercive power, and enjoying legitimacy due to a minimum level of support or loyalty from its citizens. This concept of the state is foundational to the study of international relations because it defines the basic units of the international system—sovereign states —which interact with one another in the absence of a supreme authority. It also concentrates on population, territory, autonomy, and authority. Historical Notions of State The historical formation and notion of the state are deeply rooted in the transition from medieval empires to modern nation-states, a transformation that unfolded over centuries and was marked by several key developments. Its origins have been argued to be with the Sumerian city-state in the 3 rd millennium B.C.E that have. The power was personal and traditionally, the economy was dominated by agriculture, and political authority was often tied to religious doctrine, with the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire providing a semblance of unity. The principle of territorial political rule was not yet supreme, and the concept of sovereignty as we understand it today did not exist. The modern nation-state system began to take shape with the establishment of the European 'society of states' by the end of the seventeenth century. The Peace Treaties of Westphalia in 1648 are often cited as a pivotal moment, marking the beginning of the 'Westphalian model' of international law, which emphasized the principles of sovereignty and territoriality. This model established a world order of territorial, sovereign states with no supreme authority, where states engaged in diplomatic relations and settled their differences by force if necessary. It was further expanded by colonialism in interaction with other political communities. States in Global Context The late twentieth century saw the emergence of a more complex global order, with transnational networks and relations developing across various areas of human activity. The sovereignty of the nation-state began to jostle for recognition alongside novel forms of political power and sites of authority, leading to a reevaluation of where political authority, action, and accountability should reside. The state's role has evolved due to structural changes in the world economy and society. It is no longer the sole provider of economic infrastructure or the main source of armaments, as control over foreign trade and the protection of national champions has diminished, as firms respond to market demands and supply, and the costs of protectionism have risen. The welfare state has given way to the 'competition state,' which is focused on enhancing the competitiveness of its industries in the global market. Governments now intervene to restructure industries and support scientific research, while also liberalizing sectors previously protected from competition. The key aspects of the state’s role are as follows: 1)Territoriality and Sovereignty: The state claims exclusive authority within its borders, which is a crucial aspect of international relations as it establishes the basis for interactions between states. Sovereignty implies that each state has the right to rule over its territory and determine its own rules, regulations, and policies without external interference. The world community is now organized into over 185 sovereign states. They possess both internal and external freedom to do what they wish to do without the infringement of power and discrimination by other states. This is needed to have relations on the same leveling field. National power is the might of a state which enables the state to get things done as it would like them to be done. Power is a complex of many tangible and intangible elements. 2)International Law and Engagement There has been an emphasis on international engagement as it is now a primary need for states; they are bound by international law and must reflect the politics, standards, and concerns of international rule-making in their activities. This legal framework shapes the behavior of states in the international arena. As the original and principal subjects of international law, they occupy a special place in the legal system. The moment an entity achieves statehood, it becomes an international legal person and acquires an international legal personality. While states are the primary subjects of international law, non-state actors have also acquired international legal personality. These actors include individuals, armed groups involved in conflicts, and international organizations like the United Nations, the European Union, and the African Union. The international legal personality of these entities is derived from specific instruments, such as constitutions, charters, and treaties. 3)Global Governance and Regimes The concept of global governance and international regimes illustrates how states cooperate to manage global issues that cannot be resolved unilaterally. Regimes provide a structure for governance without a central government, allowing states to collectively address issues like arms control, resource exploitation, and environmental protection. Herein, the state is central to the study of international relations and likely to remain so into the foreseeable future. The State policy is the most common object of analysis. States decide to go to war. They erect trade barriers. They choose whether and at what level to establish environmental standards. States enter international agreements, or not, and choose whether to abide by their provisions. Super-national Institutions like NATO, SEATO, and CENTO have also become a part of this regime. 4) Connectivity and Interconnectedness There has been an astounding increase in the interconnectedness of states through transnational networks and global flows, which has led to a complex web of international relations. This interconnectedness necessitates intensive transboundary coordination and regulation, further embedding states within a global political context. The scientific and modern developments of technology, the Airplane, and the Internet have further broadened the means and sources of interacting in the international field. According to McGrew, Goods, capital, people, knowledge, communication, and weapons as well as crimes, pollutants, and beliefs, rapidly move across traditional boundaries. Far from being a simple international society of states, it has become a fundamentally interconnected ‘global order’, marked by intense patterns of exchanges as well as power and hierarchy. 5) Consideration of Global factors While the sovereignty of the state may remain intact, the autonomy of the state—its capacity to articulate and achieve policy goals independently—is altered by globalization. This means that states must often consider international factors when making domestic policy decisions. 6) Importance in the discipline of IR The states are a common unit of analysis in theories of international relations. Many analysts focus on states and their interactions to explain observed patterns of world politics. The state is fundamental to neorealism (Waltz 1979) and neoliberal institutionalism (Keohane 1984). It is also key in many constructivist and English school theories (Bull 1977). Even critical, post- modern, or feminist theories, which have arisen in opposition to existing forms of social power, often focus on problematizing states and state practice. Both as objects and units of analysis, international relations is largely about states and their interactions. Conclusion In conclusion, the state serves as a crucial actor in the international system, playing a key role in shaping the dynamics of global politics. From the fields of sovereignty, international law and engagement, and global governance to connectivity and interconnectedness, and consideration of global factors, it has made its presence felt in influencing the interplay and nature of international relations. Its importance is also found highlighted by studying and analyzing the role of states in shaping the world order and addressing global challenges. Overall, it is the fundamental unit of basis that is required for any sort of international relation to come into being.