Drafting Patent Specification
Drafting Patent Specification
by
Adv. Paresh R. Chinchole
Is invention patentable ?
Oral disclosure ?
Conduct search
Enlist problems in prior art
What is the problem sought to be solved by the invention?
What is the novelty?
Is the solution obvious?
Is it artificially excluded ?
Has publication ensued?
Ascertain the type of application -whether complete or provisional is to be
filed
Decide the area and nature of protection- Paris convention, PCT, ordinary
application.
PUBLIC DOMAIN
Common general knowledge: All available public knowledge and all that is
published
PUBLICATION
Patent Office
Licensee/Assignee
Court
Competitors
Commercial players
General public
KINDS OF SPECIFICATIONS
PROVISIONAL COMPLETE
Kinds of applications:
Divisional
Patent of addition
A PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION
Pros & Cons
o commercial disclosure
o Submission of thesis
o Accidental disclosure
o Many competitors
A PROVISIONAL SPECIFICATION
o To be completed in 12 months
Description Claims
” … specification shall fully and particularly describe the invention and its
operation or use and the method in which it is to be performed;
discloses the best method of performing the invention which is known to
the applicant and for which he is entitled to claim protection…”
DESCRIPTION
No ambiguity
inventive
industrially applicable
Title
Background of Invention
Objects of Invention
Statement of Invention
Product-Process-Apparatus
Examples:
- Brush Vs. Cleaning Article
- Pen Vs. Writing Instrument
PREAMBLE
Provisional Specification
Complete Specification
Example:
If the latest art in the field (prior to the invention at hand) is Applicants own
work, then such work should not be described here
Un-solved problems
Example:
The patent application itself should contain a list of the drawings between
the summary of the invention section and the detailed description section.
The drawing section should begin with a statement indicating that the
drawings are illustrative of one or more embodiments of the invention (and
not illustrative of THE invention), such as:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Start with a general overview and proceed with increasing levels of detail;
Should set forth several, if not all, alternative working examples even if only
one embodiment is illustrated in the drawings
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION
“… the apparatus 100 as shown in Fig 1 includes a housing 10. The housing
10 is provided with a first hopper 12a and a second hopper 12b on a top
portion thereof. The housing 10 is adapted to receive a first container 14a, a
second container 14b and a collector 16 and a dispenser 18. The dispenser
18 includes a plurality of outlets 18o.……..”
CLAIMS
Define the metes and bounds of the invention: at the time of infringement
proceedings, only claims will be interpreted;
no ambiguity
Independent claim
– Stand alone
– usually broad
Example
element A;
element B; and
element C.
CLAIM FORMAT
Dependent claim
– Narrow scope
Example
Example
A chair comprising:
a seat;
a backrest; and
The patent abstract should describe the invention very clearly in the fewest
possible words.