Key Ratios: Balance Sheet (2002) in Million of Dollars
Key Ratios: Balance Sheet (2002) in Million of Dollars
Income statement(2002)
in millions of dollars
Sales $2000
Less: var.costs(60%) 1200
Fixed costs 700
--------
EBIT $100
Interest 16
------
EBIT $84
Taxes(40%) 33
Net income $50
--------
Dividends $15.12
Add: RE $35.28
Key ratios
NWC Industry Condition
1
BEP 10% 20% poor
Profit margin 2.52% 4% poor
ROE 7.20% 15.60% poor
DSO 43.8 days 32 days poor
Inv.turnover 8.33x 11x poor
F.A turnover 4x 5x poor
T.A turnover 2x 2.5x poor
Debt/assets 30% 36% good
TIE 6.25x 9.4x poor
Current ratio 2.5x 3x poor
Payout ratio 30% 30% o.k
2
NWC must have the assets to generate forecasted sales.
The balance sheet must be balance, so we must raise
$179 million externally.
How will the AFN be financed
Additional N/P
0.5($179)=$89.50
Additional L-T debt
0.5($179)=$89.50
But this financed will add to interest expense,
Which will lower NI & retained earnings.
Forecasted balance sheet(2003) assets-2nd pass
2003 1st pass
Cash $25 --- $25
Accts, rec. 300 --- 300
Inventories 300 --- 300
Total CA $625 $625
Net FA 625 --- 625
Total assets $1250 $1250
Forecasted balance sheet(2003)
Liability and equity--2nd pass
2003 1st pass
A/P accruals $125 ---- $125
Note payable 100 +89.5 190
Total CL $225 $135
L-T debt 100 +89.5 189
Common stock 500 ---- 500
Retained earnings 246 ---- 246
Total claims $1071 $1250
Why do the AFN Equation & financial statement
Method have different result?
Equation method is assumes aconstant profit margin,
Aconstant dividend payout and aconstant capital structure.
Financial statement method is more flexible, it allows different items tw grow at different rate.
Forecasted ratios(2003)
2002 2003(E) Industry condition
BEP 10% 10% 20% poor
Profıt margin 2.52% 2.62% 4% poor
ROE 7.20% 8.77% 15.60% poor
DSO(days) 43.80 days 43.80 days 32.00 days poor
Inv.turnover 8.33x 8.33x 11x poor
F.A turnover 4.00x 4.00x 5x poor
T.A turnover 2.00x 2.00x 2.5x poor
D/A ratio 30% 40.34% 36% poor
TIE 6.25x 7.81x 9.40x poor
Current ratio 2.50x 1.99x 3x poor
Payout ratio 30% 30% 30% o.k
Net investment in operating capital
OC2003=NOWC+Net FA
= $625--$125+$625
OC2002=$900
Net investment in OC = $1125--$900
3
=$225
How much free cash flow is expected be
generated in 2003?
FCF= NOPAT--Net investment in OC
=EBIT(1--T)--Net investment in OC
=$125(0.6)--$225
=$75--$225
=--$150
How would excess capacity situation affect the 2003 AFN?
The projected increase in fixed assets was $125,
The AFN would decrease by $125.
AFN = $179--$125=$54
If sales increased to 3000 instead, what would be the fi ed asset requirement?
Tarqet ratio = FA/caxacity sales
= $500/$2667
=18.75%
FA for sales up to $2667, but FA fore anothor $333 of sales
FA = 0.18775($333)
= 62.4
Forecasted ratios(2003) with projected
2003 sales of $2500
% of 2002 capacity
100% 75% industry
BEP 10% 11.11% 20%
Profit margin 2.62% 2.62% 4%
ROE 8.77% 8.77% 15.60%
DSO(days) 43.80 days 43.80 days 32.00 days
Inv. turnover 8.33x 8.33x 11.00x
F.A turnover 4.00x 5.00x 5.00x
T.A turnover 2.00x 2.22x 2.50x
D/A ratio 40.34% 33.71% 36%
TIE 7.81x 7.81x 9.40x
Current ratio 1.99x 2.48x 3.00x
4
5