Nikita Deo Singh-Dr.-S.K.
Nikita Deo Singh-Dr.-S.K.
In modern sense, more ideas regarding rule of • Predominance of the Legal Spirit
law was developed by the most famous According to Dicey, this third pillar of rule
English Constitutional lawyer, Dicey. of law means that in order
Concept of Rule of law by Dicey to enforce rule of law, an enforcing authority
is required. Dicey considered courts to be the
The concept of rule of law came into picture best enforcing authority without any
through Sir Edward Coke who believed that impartiality and external influence.
King is under God as well as Law. The base Therefore, Dicey believed in independent
for this rule of law was given by Albert Venn judiciary and not on written Constitution for
Dicey. In 1885, Dicey developed the protecting individual’s fundamentals.
concept given by Coke in his book, “Law
and Constitution”. Universality of Rule of Law
According to Dicey, the Rule of law consists Rule of law is considered to be very durable
of three pillars which are based on the which delivers mainly four universal
concept that the government should be based principles:-
on the principles of law and not of men. • Accountable: Both government and
These are:- citizens are accountable under the law.
• Supremacy of Law • Law is just: Law has clarity. It is
publicized and stable. Law is evenly
It is the first pillar for the concept of rule of applied.
law given by Dicey. This means that law is • Fair and Accessible: The process by
above all the people including the people who which law has been made either through
are administering it. Rule of law had been
_____________________________________________________________________________________
PIF 6.242 www.supremoamicus.org
SUPREMO AMICUS
Liberty, justice, equality and fraternity are Under this case of dispute, the passport of the
some of the elements of the Indian petitioner was confiscated in the public
Constitution which are mentioned in the interest. The petitioner filed a complaint in
Preamble and this is what is known as rule of court raising concern regarding the
law. relationship between Article 14, 21 and 19.
The Supreme Court expanded the reach of
Article 21 by declaring that no one shall be
1 3
Keshvananda Bharti v. State of kerela (1973) 4 SCC Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) AIR 597,
225 1978 SCR (2) 621
2
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) 2 SCC
521
_____________________________________________________________________________________
PIF 6.242 www.supremoamicus.org
SUPREMO AMICUS
_____________________________________________________________________________________
PIF 6.242 www.supremoamicus.org