This document discusses John Bowlby's attachment theory and its evolution. It describes how attachment forms through interactions between infants and caregivers. It also discusses critiques of attachment theory and experiments measuring attachment like the Strange Situation experiment. Finally, it covers topics like the role of different caregivers and daycare in attachment.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views
Attachment Theory 2-2
This document discusses John Bowlby's attachment theory and its evolution. It describes how attachment forms through interactions between infants and caregivers. It also discusses critiques of attachment theory and experiments measuring attachment like the Strange Situation experiment. Finally, it covers topics like the role of different caregivers and daycare in attachment.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 58
ATTACHMENT THEORY
CHAIR: MERCY JOY SEBASTIAN
PRESENTER: SREYA MARIYAM SALIM Theory by John Bowlby Animal research Measuring attachment Attachment and childcare Attachment beyond infancy Clinical implications References Attachment is the strong, affectionate tie we have with special people in our lives that leads us to experience pleasure and joy when we interact with them and to be comforted by their nearness in times of stress. Psychoanalytic theory according to Freud (1926), attributed attachment to satisfaction of child’s instinctual drives by mother. Mother is a provider of food and foundational figure. Learning theory (Watson & Raynor, 1920) also perceived the mother- infant bond to develop as a result of the pairing of the mother’s presence with need satisfaction. Secondary drive hypothesis According to Dollard & Miller (1950) attachment is a learned behaviour that is acquired through both classical and operant conditioning. When the infant is being fed, the infant associates the person providing the food with the food. The primary caregiver is the neutral stimulus, which becomes associated with food (the unconditioned stimulus). When the attachment has been learned, the infant gains pleasure when the primary caregiver is present. The primary caregiver is now the conditioned stimulus and pleasure is now the conditioned response. When an infant is hungry it is in an uncomfortable state. Relieving the uncomfortable state will make the infant more comfortable, and so anything it does to make itself more comfortable will be learned through negative reinforcement. Primary drives which are essential for survival, such as eating when hungry, become associated with secondary drives such as emotional closeness. They extended the theory to explain that attachment is a two way process that the caregiver must also learn, and this occurs through negative reinforcement when the caregiver feels pleasure because the infant is no longer distressed. CRITIQUE TO LEARNING THEORY OF ATTACHMENT Food may not be the main reinforcement. Many infants bond to caregivers other than their mothers. Extremely reductionist. Infants need food only a few times a day, but need emotional closeness throughout. JOHN BOWLBY British child psychiatrist and psychoanalyst. First attachment theorist. Most widely accepted view. Influenced by psychoanalytic ideas, evolution, ethology His original theory was refined several times. “Attachment is the lasting psychological connectedness between human beings.” Bowlby believed that the earliest bonds formed by children with their caregivers have tremendous impact that continues throughout life. Attachment keeps infant close to mother, thus improving chances of survival. Retained psychoanalyst idea that quality of attachment to caregiver has profound impact on child, but also said that feeding is not the basis for attachment.
Caregiver satisfies not only the physiological and psychological
needs of child, forming a safe base.
When child feels threatened during exploration of the world,
he/she returns to this safe base. MONOTROPISM: idea that most infants become more attached to mother/one primary caregiver. Separation from the primary caregiver may have serious consequences on the child. PROXIMITY SEEKING A set of typical behaviours exhibited by children to draw attention of primary caregiver with the goal of restoring proximity. Eg: cry for attention, call out, cling… SEPERATION PROTEST Set of behaviours displayed by infant as a form of protest against caregiver’s departure. STRANGER ANXIETY Fear of the infant when encountering an unfamiliar person. CRITICAL PERIOD Time period that was thought to be critical for the formation and development of any attachment relationship. Six months to three years of age. It is difficult for attachment to be formed beyond that . STAGES OF ATTACHMENT- MATERNAL DEPRIVATION HYPOTHESIS
Due to prolonged bouts of detachment from mother
figure, there will be serious deleterious outcomes. Delinquency, reduced intelligence, depression Based on studies on institutionalised children. Attempts to salvage the child are likely to be futile beyond two and half years. Animal research Ethological studies by Konrad Lorenz Imprinting: a process in which new- borns of most speices will recognise and seek proximity with the first object they encounter following activation of a trigger during a critical period after birth. On animate/inanimate object. Re-imprinting is not possible. An adaptive process. Bowlby could draw support for his theory from imprinting. Similar to behaviour in human infants pertaining to proximity seeking. Critical period applicable varies across species. EXPERIMENT ON RHESUS MONKEYS BY HARLOW AND ZIMMERMAN (1959)
Infant monkeys used cloth as a
mothering figure, though wire mesh provided food. Attachment is much more than bare essentials of nourishment. Lack of real attachment figure caused the monkeys to be withdrawn as adolescents, suggesting serious psychological damage. Critique of Bowlby’s theory
Reversibility of effects of isolation proven in monkeys, rodents.
Hence, Bowlby replaced critical period with sensitive period. SENSITIVE PERIOD: the timeframe that is most conducive to forming strong attachment compared to other times in child’s life. Later studies on institutionalised children- many children settled well into family life. Monotropism and stranger anxiety- questionable Many children have more than one primary caregiver. In one-third children, strongest tie is with someone other than mother. 1 to 2 year old children can form new relationships with others. Contributions of Rutter
Michael Rutter (1981) disagreed with Bowlby.
He studied a group of adolescent boys to see if there was a relationship between delinquent and anti-social behaviour and early separation due to hospitalisation and also due to family problems. He found that when such children returned to a stable environment, they would settle down and become less inclined to anti-social behaviour. While Rutter concluded that family arguments and unsettled family circumstances were the causes of anti-social behaviour, he argued that Bowlby was wrong to relate his work to Harlow’s studies with monkeys because firstly, Harlow had conducted privation studies, (lack of mother) while Bowlby had conducted deprivation studies (losing of mother), and also that Harlow used an experimental method, while Bowlby used an observational method. MEASURING ATTACHMENT- Mary Ainsworth New research focuses on how strong relation is, rather than if relation was formed. Work by Mary Ainsworth. STRANGE SITUATION EXPERIMENT ATTACHMENT SECURITY: readiness of the infant to use caregiver to derive a sense of security
STRANGE SITUATION: A seven part staged procedure to observe the
behaviours and interactions between the caregiver and child in a lab setting.
ATTACHMENT TYPES: Patterns of behaviour observed in strange situation
denoting differing security of attachment to caregiver as a safe base. Attachment types during strange situation experiment Critique of strange situation experiment
Child could exhibit different attachment behaviours with
different people. Child may have been exposed to adults other than the primary caregiver. Hence, ‘strange’ episodes are not as stressful as thought. Variations with cultural norms Independence or insecurity? Only overt behaviour can be taken into account, since study is conducted on pre-linguistic children. ATTACHMENT AND CHILDCARE
MOTHER FATHER DAYCARE The mother
Most often the primary caregiver.
MATERNAL SENSITIVITY: Emotional sensitivity on part of the mother to recognise infant’s cues and respond to them promptly. Secure attachment is associated with maternal sensitivity. Mothers who at times act in rejecting manner and at other times overstimulate children cause insecure- avoidant attachment. Sometimes unresponsive and sometimes overbearing mothers- insecure-resistant. Inadequate care- disorganised attachment. Depression in mother may lead to negative emotions in child, externalised as somatic symptoms. Relation between maternal sensitivity and attachment security is not direct and causal. Cross-cultural variations. Work by Elizabeth Meins
MIND-MINDEDNESS: Ability of the parent
to see and treat child as an individual with his/her own thoughts and feelings, using talk to refer to mental states. More secure attachment and cognitive behavioural traits. Work by Elizabeth Meins Predicts attachment security better than maternal sensitivity. The father
Role of father in childcare emphasised since 1990s.
Similar to role of mother in attachment security, but differences in the quality of attachment. Different factors predict maternal and paternal attachment. Play sensitivity predicts paternal attachment. PLAY SENSITIVITY: responsiveness to infant during play through cooperation and motivation, by accepting child’s initiatives, responding to emotional expressions and adapting the play to cognitive capability. Impact of day care
Much debated and discussed.
Concerns about institutionalisation raised by Bowlby. Later studies showed association between high-quality day care and attachment security. Closer carer-child relationships can buffer against insecure attachment with mothers. ATTACHMENT BEYOND INFANCY
Cross-generational factors: mother’s attachment during
childhood can have a bearing on her parental capacity, and in turn the child’s future parental capacity. Internal working model
Through the relationships that
child has with caregivers, he/she builds up expectations about self, others and relationships. Child is able to internally represent relationships. Signifies a cognitive side to attachment, beyond its emotional and behavioural side. Warm, attentive caregivers- secure attachment in child Cold, rejecting caregivers- avoidant attachment Inconsistent, unpredictable caregivers- resistant attachment. Disturbed or distorted caregiving- unable to organise a coherent set of actions or expectations towards caregiver- disorganised attachment. Attachment in later childhood and adolescence Studies by Mary Main and colleagues on pre school and early school children based on strange situation experiment and other scales. Secure attachment promotes emotional coherence and openness, better social play, good relationships. Insecure attachment – Irrational, negative answers Less engagement in social activities Less expectations in relationships Attachment security in infancy can predict development well into future. But, there are exceptions. Adulthood and intergenerational cycle
Adult Attachment interview-by Mary
Main semistructured interview to measure how an adult is able to integrate memories of her earliest relationships with her caregivers into her present state of mind concerning relationships.
More about ‘how’ the recall is, rather
than ‘what’ Supported by longitudinal studies based on strange situation experiment. Changes according to differences in family circumstances, life events etc. Attachment organisation and stable home life - predictors of later health, well being and personality. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ATTACHMENT THEORY ATTACHMENT DISORDERS FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE ATTACHMENT BASED INTERVENTIONS. DIVORCE AND CHILD CUSTODY ATTACHMENT BASED INTERVENTIONS RELATIONSHIP WITH PSYCHOPATHOLOGY Attachment disorders
REACTIVE ATTACHMENT DISINHIBITED SOCIAL
DISORDER ENGAGEMENT DISORDER Minimal response/seeking Approaches and interacts comfort when distressed. with strangers. Overly Minimal social and familiar. emotional responsiveness. h/o unstable attachment Irritable, sad, fearful with with primary caregiver. caregivers. Attachment disorders have been seen to remit when caregiving conditions improve. No straightforward relation with attachment type. Foster care and adoption Limited or no attachment seen in one third children. Improved attachment with good care from foster parents. Children placed prior to 10 months age- more likely to be attached to foster parents. Adoptive parents who are secure according to AAI- more lilkely to form secure relation with adopted children. Interventions needed to improve parents’ reflective capacities. Divorce and child custody Principles of attachment theory can help make child custody decisions. Separations like overnight visits one parent in children younger than 3 years to may harm primary attachment. Best if both parents are present at the time of visit. Transitional object, following routine- can make the child more comfortable. Intimate partner violence
Risk for disorganised attachment.
Role- reversed relationship disturbance. (child worried about caregiver) Clinician should ensure safety of child. Attachment based interventions. Attachment based interventions
Child parent psychotherapy
For traumatized families with children younger than 5. Unstructured sessions with theme decided largely by parent. To improve emotional communication between parent and child. Video based interventions to promote positive parenting(VIPP) Home based. To promote maternal sensitivity using video of child and parent, written material etc. Circle of security group psychotherapy Using video reviews. Educate caregivers about subtle behaviours, attachment needs. Attachment and Biobehavioural Catch-up (ABC) Carefully selected videotaped examples from interactions used to address challenges. Used in foster care Relation with psychopathology Attachment insecurity is the main cause of separation anxiety and pathological grief. Attachment insecurities are associated with Depression Anxiety OCD PTSD Suicidal tendencies Eating disorders Personality disorders Bio psychosocial factors converge with or amplify the effects of attachment experiences, leading to psychopathology. Psychological problems can increase attachment insecurity. Interactions with attachment figures trigger positive emotions and provide psychological resources for dealing with adversities. Secure individuals cope better. SECURITY PRIMING: subliminal pictures, names, guided imagery suggesting attachment figure availability. Improves mood even in threatening contexts. Mitigated cognitive symptoms of PTSD. Attachment- nature or nurture? Bowlby- innate tendency Supported by neuroimaging. Oxytocin- social and spatial memories, affiliative behaviour, emotional regulation, physical proximity, nurturance Dopamine- motivated behaviour Also influenced by environment- stress during pregnancy, early experinces, cultural variations… Hence, not every characteristic of attachment is innate, even if we say that the tendency to bond to caregiver per se is innate. REFERENCES
Developmental psychology(Rachel Gillibrand, Virginia Lam, Victoria L’O
Donnel)- 2nd edition; Chapter 9 Child Development (Laura. E. Berk)- 9th edition; chapter 10 Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry- 10th edition; Chapter 6 Zeanah CH, Berlin LJ, Boris NW. Practitioner review: clinical applications of attachment theory and research for infants and young children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;52(8):819-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02399.x. Epub 2011 May 9. PMID: 21554304; PMCID: PMC3670111. Mikulincer M, Shaver PR. An attachment perspective on psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;11(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.003. PMID: 22294997; PMCID: PMC3266769.