Helical Gear Design Procedure
Helical Gear Design Procedure
36, 318.095
transmit 50 hp at 1750 rpm of the pinion; SR ≈ 4.25; ψ = 15o; 96.805 823.2
minimum Dp = 4.375 in.; continuous service; 20o F.D. teeth with load Fd 823.2
Pd
applied near the middle; material is AISI 4150 OQT 1200oF. Decide 36, 318.095
1/ 2
Fs
k f ( Pd ) 1.7 Pd
* the dynamic load equation for helical gears is given as:
847, 382.3(Y )
0.05Vm (Ft Cb cos ) cos
2 Fs 2
Fd Ft Pd
0.05Vm (Ft Cb cos )
2 2
Note: from this point forward, the correct diametral pitch (Pd) and
* where the transmitted load Ft, is: face width (b) values will be determined using trial and error method
33, 000 H p 33, 000 (50 Hp ) outlined below.
Ft
Vm 2004.401 ft/min Step 1: Assign an initial value of Pd, then solve for both Fd and Fs. If
Ft 823.188 lbs. Fs < Fd, then the assigned Pd is not acceptable. Change Pd value and
recalculate Fs and Fd until (Fs > Fd) is satisfied.
* the recommended minimum face width as recommended by
Step 2: If Fs > Fd, check for the service factor (Nsf = Fs/Fd) and see if
FAIRES eq.(a) & eq.(d) p.399-400 is:
it satisfies the requirement (in this case, Nsf = 1.5 minimum).
2 - if the computed service factor is lower than what is required,
b 2 Pa 2
Pd tan Pd tan decrease Pd value and re-evaluate!
- if the computed service factor is too much (over-design), try to
* to solve for the C constant, see method in previous example (Gear increase Pd value until the computed service factor is more or
design using Buckingham Equation); less equal to what is required in the problem.
- assume steel on steel, 20o FD, e = 0.001
therefore, C = 1660 Example: Let Pd = 9
* the dynamic load equation becomes: * therefore the dynamic load Fd, becomes:
0.05Vm (Ft Cb cos ) cos
2
96.805 823.2
36, 318.095
Fd Ft
0.05Vm (Ft Cb cos )
2 2
Fd 823.2
9
36, 318.095
1/ 2
2 o 2
100.22 823.2
823.2 1660 P tan15o (cos15 ) cos15
o
0.05(2004.4) 9
Fd 823.2
d
Fd 3591.104 lbs.
2 o 2
1/ 2
100.22 823.2
N sf 1.968 11
Fd 3251.388 lbs.
Analysis:
For Pd = 9, the resulting service factor Nsf = 1.968 is quiet high as
compared to what is required (Nsf = 1.5 minimum). A larger factor * for Pd = 11, the number of teeth on the pinion is
of safety is always preferred but it usually entails a higher product N p Pd ( D p ) 11 teeth/in (4.375 in)
cost. As mechanical designers, we not only concern ourselves with N p 48.125 teeth 49 teeth
the functionality of the product but with the cost of the product as
well. A good designer always seeks out a product design that serves
its purpose while utilizing the least cost. * for Np = 49 teeth, the equivalent number of teeth is:
Np 49
Conclusion: Ne
(cos )
3 o 3
(cos15 )
Service factor is too high (over-design)! Increase Pd value and
recalculate Fd and Fs. N e 54.37 teeth
Fs = 4,183.105 lbs.
b 2.132 in.
Nsf = 1.341
* solving for gear diameter, Dg
Dg ( SR )( D p ) (4.25)(4.375 in.)
Dg 18.594 in.
* where Q is:
2( SR ) 2(4.25)
Q
SR 1 4.25 1
Q 1.619
* also, the wear factor for gearing, Kg, is determined using Table
AT26, p.603 FAIRES:
BHN for both gear and pinion is 331
Sum of BHN is therefor: 331+331 = 662
For Sum of BHN = 662, 20o FD: Kg = 241.88 (interpolated)
Summary:
To do: