0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Helical Gear Design Procedure

Uploaded by

Pompey G. Jomuad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Helical Gear Design Procedure

Uploaded by

Pompey G. Jomuad
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

A pair of helical gears, subjected to heavy shock loading, is to 

 36, 318.095 
transmit 50 hp at 1750 rpm of the pinion; SR ≈ 4.25; ψ = 15o; 96.805 823.2   
minimum Dp = 4.375 in.; continuous service; 20o F.D. teeth with load Fd  823.2 
  Pd 
applied near the middle; material is AISI 4150 OQT 1200oF. Decide   36, 318.095 
1/ 2

upon the pitch, face width. 100.22  823.2   


  Pd 
Given:
Power = 50 Hp np = 1750 rpm * the gear beam strength is also computed using:
SR ≈ 4.25 Helix angle, ψ = 15o S (b )(Y )(cos )
Dp = 4.375 in. Tooth profile = 20o FD (load at middle) Fs  n
k f ( Pd )
Mat’l = SAE 0105 WQT (Table AT 9 p.579 FAIRES)
Su = 159 ksi (Sn = 0.4 Su = 63.6 ksi), BHN = 331
* where Y is the Lewis form factor for the equivalent number of teeth
Additional given and assumptions: in helical gears, Ne:
1. For loads applied “at the middle”, let kf = 1.7 (unless otherwise Np
specified). Ne 
(cos )
3

2. For shock loading and continuous service, let N sf = 1.5 minimum


(unless otherwise specified)
* and the number of teeth of pinion, Np, is computed using:
Solution: N p  Pd ( D p )
* Solving for the pitch line velocity, Vm
 ( Dp )( n p )  (4.375 in)(1750 rpm) * therefore, the gear beam strength equation becomes:
Vm  
12 12  2  o
63, 600 psi   (Y ) cos15
Vm  2004.401 ft/min S n (b)(Y )(cos )  Pd tan15 
o

Fs  
k f ( Pd ) 1.7 Pd
* the dynamic load equation for helical gears is given as:
847, 382.3(Y )
0.05Vm (Ft  Cb cos  ) cos 
2 Fs  2
Fd  Ft  Pd
0.05Vm  (Ft  Cb cos  )
2 2

Note: from this point forward, the correct diametral pitch (Pd) and
* where the transmitted load Ft, is: face width (b) values will be determined using trial and error method
33, 000 H p 33, 000 (50 Hp ) outlined below.
Ft  
Vm 2004.401 ft/min Step 1: Assign an initial value of Pd, then solve for both Fd and Fs. If
Ft  823.188 lbs. Fs < Fd, then the assigned Pd is not acceptable. Change Pd value and
recalculate Fs and Fd until (Fs > Fd) is satisfied.
* the recommended minimum face width as recommended by
Step 2: If Fs > Fd, check for the service factor (Nsf = Fs/Fd) and see if
FAIRES eq.(a) & eq.(d) p.399-400 is:
it satisfies the requirement (in this case, Nsf = 1.5 minimum).
    2  - if the computed service factor is lower than what is required,
b  2 Pa  2   
 Pd tan    Pd tan   decrease Pd value and re-evaluate!
- if the computed service factor is too much (over-design), try to
* to solve for the C constant, see method in previous example (Gear increase Pd value until the computed service factor is more or
design using Buckingham Equation); less equal to what is required in the problem.
- assume steel on steel, 20o FD, e = 0.001
therefore, C = 1660 Example: Let Pd = 9

* the dynamic load equation becomes: * therefore the dynamic load Fd, becomes:
0.05Vm (Ft  Cb cos  ) cos 
2 
96.805 823.2  
 36, 318.095 
 
Fd  Ft 
0.05Vm  (Ft  Cb cos  )
2 2
Fd  823.2 
 9 
  36, 318.095 
1/ 2

  2  o 2
100.22  823.2  
 
823.2  1660  P tan15o  (cos15 )  cos15  
o
0.05(2004.4) 9
Fd  823.2 
  d  
Fd  3591.104 lbs.
  2  o 2
1/ 2

0.05(2004.4)  823.2  1660  o 


(cos15 ) 
  Pd tan15   * for Pd = 9, the number of teeth on the pinion is
N p  Pd ( D p )  9 teeth/in (4.375 in)
N p  39.375 teeth  40 teeth
* for Np = 40 teeth, the equivalent number of teeth is: Pd comparison:
Np 40
Ne   Pd Y b Fd Fs Nsf
(cos )
3 o 3
(cos15 )
9 0.676 2.605 3591.091 7068.424 1.968
N e  44.38 teeth
10 0.690 2.345 3406.152 5848.908 1.717
11 0.703 2.132 3251.388 4921.410 1.514
* from Table AT 24 p.601 FAIRES
for Ne = 44.38 teeth, 20o FD with load near middle 12 0.711 1.954 3119.852 4183.105 1.341
Y = 0.6757 (interpolated)
Analysis:
* therefore, the gear beam strength equation becomes: Based on the summarized data, we can conclude that the
847, 382.3(0.6757) appropriate Pd to be used is Pd = 11. Also, notice that by increasing
Fs  2
the Pd, we were able to decrease the size of the face width (b) thus
(9) reducing the cost of manufacturing the gear.
Fs  7, 068.842 lbs.
Conclusion:
Let Pd = 11.
Fs > Fd, therefore Pass!
* therefore the dynamic load Fd, becomes:
* solving for the service factor,

96.805 823.2  
 36, 318.095 
 

F 7, 068.842 lbs.
N sf  s 
Fd  823.2 
 11
Fd 3, 591.104 lbs.
  36, 318.095 
1/ 2

100.22  823.2   
N sf  1.968   11 
Fd  3251.388 lbs.
Analysis:
For Pd = 9, the resulting service factor Nsf = 1.968 is quiet high as
compared to what is required (Nsf = 1.5 minimum). A larger factor * for Pd = 11, the number of teeth on the pinion is
of safety is always preferred but it usually entails a higher product N p  Pd ( D p )  11 teeth/in (4.375 in)
cost. As mechanical designers, we not only concern ourselves with N p  48.125 teeth  49 teeth
the functionality of the product but with the cost of the product as
well. A good designer always seeks out a product design that serves
its purpose while utilizing the least cost. * for Np = 49 teeth, the equivalent number of teeth is:
Np 49
Conclusion: Ne  
(cos )
3 o 3
(cos15 )
Service factor is too high (over-design)! Increase Pd value and
recalculate Fd and Fs. N e  54.37 teeth

* from Table AT 24 p.601 FAIRES


Note: calculation for different Pd values are not shown but are for Ne = 54.37 teeth, 20o FD with load near middle
summarized as follows Y = 0.7027 (interpolated)

For Pd = 9 * therefore, the gear beam strength equation becomes:


Fd = 3,591.104 lbs. 847, 382.3(0.7027)
Fs = 7,068.842 lbs. Fs  2
(11)
Nsf = 1.968
Fs  4, 921.410 lbs.
For Pd = 10 Fs > Fd, therefore Pass!
Fd = 3,406.166 lbs.
Fs = 5,848.908 lbs. * solving for the service factor,
Nsf = 1.717 F 4, 921.410 lbs.
N sf  s 
For Pd = 11 Fd 3, 251.388 lbs.
Fd = 3,251.388 lbs. N sf  1.514
Fs = 4,921.41 lbs.
Nsf = 1.514
* solving for the face width, b:
For Pd = 12 2 2
b 
Fd = 3119.852 lbs. Pd tan  (11)(tan15 )
o

Fs = 4,183.105 lbs.
b  2.132 in.
Nsf = 1.341
* solving for gear diameter, Dg
Dg  ( SR )( D p )  (4.25)(4.375 in.)
Dg  18.594 in.

* solving for the number of teeth of the gear, N g


N g  ( SR )( N p )  (4.25)(49 teeth)
N g  208.25  208 teeth

* solving for the gear rotative speed, ng


n p 1750 rpm
ng  
SR 4.25
ng  411.765 rpm

* the limiting wear load equation is:


D p (b)(Q )( K g )
Fw 
(cos )
2

* where Q is:
2( SR ) 2(4.25)
Q 
SR  1 4.25  1
Q  1.619

* also, the wear factor for gearing, Kg, is determined using Table
AT26, p.603 FAIRES:
BHN for both gear and pinion is 331
Sum of BHN is therefor: 331+331 = 662
For Sum of BHN = 662, 20o FD: Kg = 241.88 (interpolated)

* therefore, the limiting wear load Fw, is:


D p (b)(Q)( K g ) (4.375 in.)(2.132 in.)(1.619)(241.88)
Fw  
(cos )
2 o 2
(cos15 )
Fw  3, 914.935 lbs.
Fw > Fd , therefore, pass!

Summary:

Dp (inches) 4.375 Dg (inches) 18.59


Np (teeth) 49 Ng (teeth) 208
np (rpm) 1750 ng (rpm) 411.76
SR 4.25 Fd (lbs) 3,251.39
Pd 11 Fs (lbs) 4,921.41
b (inches) 2.13 Fw (lbs) 3,914.58
Nsf = 1.51

To do:

Recalculate everything using a helix angle of ψ = 20o

You might also like