Enforcement Directorate India
Enforcement Directorate India
(a) ED is Financial Investigation Agency (FIA) of govt. of India. to monitor the strict compliances for
constitution of India + lawful authorities like CBI + RBI + Courts + etc + to establish + to maintain
high professional standards + credibility of govt. of India .
(c) Enforcement Directorate (ED) is originally as formed on May 01, 1956 under Enforcement
Directorate by govt. of India as Enforcement Unit in Department of Economic Affairs for handling
Exchange Control Laws violations under Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) 1947.
(d) Enforcement unit (ED office) is originally as established + had Headquarter in New Delhi as
headed by Legal Service Officer (LSO) Director of Enforcement + assisted by Officer as came on
deputation from Reserve Bank of India (RBI) + 3 Inspector of Special Police Establishment + 2
branch of ED office like 1st branch at Mumbai (Bombay) + 2nd branch at Kolkata (Calcutta) in 1957
.
(a) Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) renamed as Enforcement Directorate (ED) in 1957 + 3rd
branch was opened at Chennai (Madras) in 1960
(b) Administrative control of ED office was transferred from department of Economic Affairs to
Department of Revenue of Govt. of India
(d) Office of FERA 1973 for 4 year (1973 to 1977) + ED office was remained under administrative
jurisdiction of Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms.
(d) Now ED office is under administrative control of Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance of
Govt. of India.
(iii) FERA, 1973 repealed by Foreign Exchange Management Act, (FEMA), 1999
(a) FERA, 1973 was repealed by Foreign Exchange Management Act, (FEMA), 1999 and FEMA,
1999 came in operation from June 01, 2000. Hence FERA, 1973 was in operation till May 31st, 2000.
(b) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) was enacted + ED was entrusted for
enforcement from July 01st 2005 + for matching with International Anti Money Laundering
Regulations as applicable outside India.
(c) Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 (FEOA) + ED (both) entrusted for enforcement from April
21st, 2018 against economic offenders as taking a shelter in foreign countries like Nirav Modi + Vijay
Mallya + (in UK) + Mehul Choksi + etc.
(a) PMLA, 2002 is criminal laws as enacted to prevent money laundering + to provide the
powers for confiscation of property as derived from or involved in money laundering + for
matter as connected + incidental to it (all).
(b) ED is permitted to enforce the provisions of PMLA, 2002 through conducting the
investigations to trace the assets as derived from the proceeds of crime + permitted for
provisionally attachment of property + to ensure the prosecution of offender + confiscation of
property through Special court as constituted for money laundering cases by govt. of India.
(a) FEMA, 1999 is civil laws as enacted to consolidate + to amend the laws for facilitating the
external trade + payments + to promote the orderly development + maintenance of foreign
exchange market in India.
(a) FEOA, 2018 is enacted to stop the economic offenders from evading the process of legal
Indian laws through staying outside India to avoid jurisdiction of Indian courts.
(b) FEOA, 2018 is laws where ED office is permitted to attach the properties of fugitive
economic offender as absconded from India for avoiding the arrest in India + to confiscate the
properties of offenders in India.
(v) Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act (COFEPOSA)
1974
ED office is permitted to sponsor the cases for preventive detention against contraventions under
FEMA, 1999.
Definition of PMLA under section 3 of PMLA, 2002 is including the alleged activity of Money
Laundering for converting the Non legitimize money into legitimize money as earned through
scheduled offence.
(ii) Where Non legitimize money is already earned through alleged scheduled offence
(iii) Where Non– legitimize money is already earned through alleged scheduled offence + already
converted into legitimize money through Money laundering.
Burden of proof on Enforcement Directorate (ED) that money laundering activity already committed.
Hence burden of proof on ED as part of natural justice under constitution of India
(ii) PMLA is applicable on whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir from July, 01st 2005
(v) PMLA is 3rd time amended through Finance Act, 2015 from May 14th, 2015.
(vi) PMLA is 4th time amended through Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 from July, 01st 2015.
(vii) PMLA is 5th time amended through Finance Act, 2016 from June, 01st 2016.
(viii) PMLA is 6th time amended through Finance Act, 2018 from April, 19th 2018.
(ix) PMLA is 7th time amended through Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 from July,
26th 2018.
(x) PMLA is 8th time amended through Finance Act (No. 1), 2019 from March, 20th 2019
(xi) PMLA is 9th time amended through Aadhar and other laws (Amendment) Act, 2019 from July, 25
th 2019
(xii) PMLA is 10th time amended through Finance Act (No.2), 2019 from August, 01st 2019
List of 29 scheduled offences under PMLA, 2002 is including the Corporate Frauds as defined under
section 447 of Companies Act, 2013.
6. Arrest under PMLA without issue of warrant + filling of FIR (both) in India
(ii) Hence officer of ED office is permitted to arrest without issue of warrant + filling of FIR (both).
Time limit for retention of records + properties (both) not exceeding the 180 day from date of
retention
ED office in Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance is authorized for investigations the cases
against already committed alleged money laundering through scheduled offences.
FIU–IND under Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance is central nodal agency + authorized
(both) for receiving + processing + analyzing + disseminating (all) information’s as relating to alleged
money laundering + to inform to ED office (all).
(i) Financial Action Task Force (FATF) on Money Laundering is established through G–7 Summit as
held at Paris in 1989 for developing a coordinating an international agency.
(ii) (a) 1st tasks of FATF to develop the recommendations for setting the measures for countries +
territories (both) for effective anti-money laundering
(iii) Member of FATF is required to have separate PMLA similar to PMLA in India.
(i) Under Companies Act, 2013 for Corporate frauds (Section 447)
(ii) Under Suppression of Unlawful Acts for Safety of Maritime Navigation and Fixed Platforms on
Continental Shelf Act, 2002
(iv) Under Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001
(vi) Under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000
(i) ED
(ii) Police
(iii) Customs
(iv) SEBI
(v) NCB
(vi) CBI
(vii) Etc.
(iii) To conduct a search of buildings + places + vessels + vehicles + aircrafts and seize the records +
properties (section 17)
(v) To arrest the person as accused for alleged money laundering (section 19)
(v) Interest in any property + asset as located in India + Outside India (both)
(i) Individual
(vi) Other artificial juridical person not already covered under Para i to v as abovementioned
(vii) Agency office + branch office (both) owned + controlled by persons under Para i to vi as
abovementioned.
(i) Officer of ED office is required to have in possession a specific material for already alleged
committed money laundering
+
(ii) Officer of ED office is required to have the reason to believe in writing
(iii) Officer of ED office is required to communicate the grounds for arrest to person to be arrested
(iv) Officer of ED office is required to intimate to adjudicating authority under PMLA, 2002.
18. Role of Income Tax (IT) deptt. under Income Tax Act (ITA) 1961 for ED office
Now IT Department is forwarding the 1000’s case to ED office for investigations against alleged
money laundering under PMLA, 2002 where incomes are evaded by taxpayer under ITA, 1961.
(ii) Imprisonment + financial penalty under ITA, 1961 + PMLA, 2002 (both)
Imprisonment + financial penalty to be levied by Income tax department for evasion of income +
imprisonment + financial penalty (both) for money laundering additionally on same financial
transaction under PMLA, 2002.
(iii) IT deptt. informing to ED office where cases time barred under ITA, 1961
Now IT department is forwarding the 1000’s case to ED office for investigations against alleged
money laundering under PMLA, 2002 where Income tax cases are time barred for issuing of notice
under section 148A of ITA, 1961 after expiry of 10 Assessment years against likely escaped incomes
exceeding 50 lac per assessment year.
(iv) IT deptt. informing to ED office using AI + data mining + data analyzing (all)
(a) Now IT department + other offices under revenue department of Ministry of Finance are
forwarding the 1000’s case to ED office for investigations against alleged money laundering
through using the latest digital techniques like Artificial Intelligence (AI) data mining + data
analyzing + etc. for finding the Money Laundering under PMLA, 2002.
(b) Hence IT department + other offices under revenue department of Ministry of Finance are
extra vigilant for finding Money Laundering cases + forwarding to ED office for investigations
under PMLA, 2002
19. Imprisonment + financial penalty for money laundering under PMLA, 2002
Imprisonment + financial penalty (both) be levied by special court as specifically constituted for
money laundering under PMLA, 2002 for minimum 3 year and maximum 7 year + fine INR 5 Lac
(both)
(ii) Imprisonment + financial penalty (both) to officer of ED office for vexatious (illegal) search
(section 62 of PMLA, 2002)
(a) Officer of ED office is liable for punishment + financial penalty (both) for exercising the powers as
available under PMLA, 2002 without recording the reasons for search like :-
(b) Officer of ED office is liable for imprisonment for maximum 2 year or maximum fine INR 50
thousand or both.
(iii) Imprisonment to alleged offender for false information’s + failure to give information + etc. to
ED office (Section 63)
Imprisonment is permitted for maximum 2 year + maximum financial penalty INR 50 thousand or
both for willfully + maliciously giving false information’s to ED office.
(iv) Designated Special Courts for imprisonment under PMLA (Section 43)
Govt. of India in consultation with Chief Justice of High Court is permitted to designate 1 or more
Special Courts for area + case + class + group of cases as may be specified in notification as issued by
govt. of India.
(i) Any person is liable for prosecution where acquired the foreign exchange + foreign security +
immovable property (any) located outside India in aggregate value as exceeding the limit as
prescribed under section 37A(1) + financial penalty in addition to prosecution
(ii) Imprisonment after proceeding for prosecution not to exceed the 5 year + financial penalty (both).
Imprisonment is permitted where person is failed to make 100% payment against penalty as imposed
under section 13 maximum in 90 day from date of issue of notice for payment of penalty.
(i) (a) Company’s officer as in-charge for fulfilling the compliances of FEMA, 1999 is liable against
contraventions of rules + notifications + directions + orders and be punished with imprisonment +
financial penalty (both).
(b) However company’s officer as in-charge for fulfilling the compliances is not liable against
contraventions of rules + notifications + directions + orders under FEMA, 1999 where company’s
officer is able to prove that contravention took place without knowledge of him or he had exercised
100% due diligence to prevent the contravention.
(ii) Company’s officer like director + manager + company secretary + any other officer having
consent or connivance (any) against contravention is liable for prosecution + financial penalty (both)
under FEMA, 1999
Include body corporate + partnership firm + LLP + Association of Individuals (AOI) + Body of
individuals (BOI) all
Include a partner for partnership firm + designated partner for LLP (both).
(i) Adjudicating authority is permitted to direct to Govt. to confiscate the currency + security + other
money + any other property (all) against contravention in addition to prosecution + financial penalty
(both)
(a) Include deposit in bank where contravened property is converted into deposit
(b) Include Indian currency where contravened property is converted into currency
(c) Include any other property where contravened property is converted into any other
property
(b) These officers are known as officers of Enforcement Directorate under FEMA, 1999.
(iii) Govt. is permitted to impose the terms and conditions for officers of Enforcement Directorate
against powers + discharge the duties as conferred or imposed under FEMA, 1999.
(i) Enforcement Directorate + officers of Enforcement Directorate as not below the rank of Assistant
Director are permitted to take up the investigations against contraventions as conferred under section
13 of FEMA, 1999.
(ii) Govt. is permitted to authorize any officer or class of officers already posted in Central Govt. or
State Govt. or RBI as not below the rank of Under Secretary in Govt. to investigate any
contravention as conferred under section 13 of FEMA, 1999.
(iii) Officers of Enforcement Directorate are permitted to exercise the powers as conferred on Income
tax authorities under Income–tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) + subject to limitations as laid down under
Income–tax Act, 1961.
(i) (a) Officer as prescribed by Govt. is permitted to order + seize the equivalent value of assets as
situated in India through recording the reasons in writing about suspected foreign exchange + foreign
security + immovable property (all) situated outside India in contravention as conferred under
section 4 of FEMA, 1999
(b) Officer is not permitted to seize the assets where aggregate value of foreign exchange +
foreign security + immovable property (all) situated outside India are not exceeding the value
as prescribed by RBI.
(ii) Officer is required to place the order of seizure + relevant material before Competent Authority
as appointed by Govt. in 30 day from date of seizure.
(iii) Competent Authority to dispose the petition in 180 day from date of seizure through confirming
or setting aside the seizure order after giving an opportunity of being heard to representative of
Enforcement Directorate + aggrieved person (both).
(iv) (a) Competent Authority is permitted to confirm the continuity of seizure of equivalent amount
as mentioned in order till disposal of adjudication of proceedings before Adjudicating Authority
(v) Aggrieved person is permitted to appeal before Appellate Tribunal against order as passed by
Competent Authority.
(i) Govt. is permitted to authorize any officer of custom + central excise + police + officer of Central
govt. or state govt. (any) to exercise the powers + discharge the duty of Director of Enforcement or
officer of Enforcement Directorate under FEMA, 1999
(a) ED office to ensure the soundness of moral principle + honesty + sincerity (all) towards in
official workings
(b) ED office to ensure the high standards of personal conduct + character (both) towards in
interaction with alleged offender
(c) ED office to ensure the 100% trustworthiness in handling information’s of alleged offender.
(a) ED office to ensure that how work to be evaluated + success to be measured and determined
towards Enforcement Director + officers (both).
(b) ED office to ensure the responsibility for consequences of efforts + actions (both) towards
the alleged offender
(a) ED office to ensure to complete the 100% task + with responsibility (both) towards the
alleged offender
(b) ED office to ensure to achieve the team + organizational objective (both) towards govt. of
India
(a) ED office to ensure the constant improvement in work performance through upgrading the
systems + methods + to remove the wastes + inefficiencies of work (all) towards govt. of India
(b) ED office to ensure the sharpen in investigative skills + learning from best practices being
followed globally (outside India)
(c) ED office to ensure the support of teamwork + communicate with each other to encourage
the delegation of task + to deal strictly with discipline issues.
(c) ED office to ensure to take decision without any fear + favor (both)
(d) ED office to ensure to act without any malice + prejudice + bias + not to allow the abuse of
powers.
2. Concept of Confirmed Attached properties
(i) PMLA, 2002 was enacted with objectives of prevention of money laundering + providing powers
for confiscation of properties as derived from + or involved in money laundering (both).
(ii) Hence to achieve the objectives a section 5(1) of PMLA is providing for provisional attachment of
property during course of investigation through issuance of Provisional Attachment Order(PAO).
(iii) ED office is required to issue a PAO where PAO is not permitted as exceeding the 180 day from
date of passing of PAO.
(iv) (a) However Adjudicating Authority is permitted to extend the POA as not exceeding 365 day
where property is involved in money laundering + order is issued under section 8(3) of PMLA, 2002.
(b) Hence once an order is issued under Section 8(3) of PMLA, 2002 or date of completion of
proceedings for offence under PMLA, 2002 whichever earlier.
General Public is required to be cautioned as not to deal with immovable property in any manner as
liable for confiscation by govt. of India after conclusion of proceedings against offender under PMLA,
2002.
(a) Now cases are received by ED office where people are conned + cheated + robbed by conman
.
(b) Recently ED office has received a case of conman like Sukesh Chandrasekhar he spoofed
the phone numbers of senior Govt. officials + offering the help from senior govt. officials to
people in lieu of money.
(c) Hence Sukesh Chandrasekhar has extorted the money around INR 200 Crore.
(d) In some other cases fake notices were issued by conman to people for extorting money.
Some conmen already arrested + most of conmen still absconding till date.
(a) Spoofing call is act of disguising a phone call from unknown source but looks from known
source.
Hence process of changing the Caller ID of any number other than the actual calling number.
(b) Spoofing is enabling the caller to reflect any number as desired by him on screen of called
number where in reality no call is made from number as reflected on phone.
(c) Receiver of spoofed call to believe that it genuine call from the number.
(g) Call would look normal + True Caller App verification is reflecting same phone number as
pertain to govt. of India official.
(b) Where neither anyone is aware of govt. of India structure + hierarchy (both) nor of
functions + duties of govt. of Indian official
(f) Thereafter it lead to beginning of putting faith on conman + later on extortion under guise of
offering help.
(b) Conman is identifying the govt. of India official + make a call to con to believe on him
(c) Conman is using call spoofing technology + making spoofing calls to victim
(e) Victim is falling in trap getting convinced to do financial transaction which leading to
financial loss for victim
(a) It’s advisable that person receiving the calls from govt. of India landline number especially
when not expected any call must cross verify the number through dialing again after sometime.
(b) Where call is received from govt. of India office then adequate precautions be taken through
noting down the name + designation of person as calling.
100% efforts to be made to cross verify the information as given by calling person with other source
like govt. of India website or calling other office number of same office as available on website.
(d) Avoid any divulging of personal + family details to anyone on phone where have not met
before or don’t have established credential (both).
(e) 100% official correspondences from ED offices are made through letters + summons +
notices + etc. (all) issued under relevant provisions of laws + dispatched through post or emails
(only).
However in case of doubt about any letter + summon + notice + etc. (all) received from ED office to
be cross verified through official website.
Its advisable to make phone call to followings designated officers on telephone or email where any
doubt about any call + summon + letter + notice + etc. (all) received from ED office :-
(i) ED office under PMLA, 2002 is permitted to attach the immovable properties + assets (both)
involved in money laundering from 3rd party like purchasers including bank during proceedings in
special court.
(ii) (a) ED office has attached immovable properties + assets (both) from Vijay Mallya + Nirav
Modi + Mehul Choksi (all) who have defrauded the Public Sector Banks (PSBs) through
siphoning off the funds where total siphoning off was INR 22,585.83 Crore.
(b) ED office has taken quick action for attachment of immovable properties + assets (both)
during proceedings in special court to avoid disappearance of immovable properties + assets
(both) from recovery process of ED office.
(iii) (a) ED office has attached immovable properties + assets (both) worth INR 19,111.20 crore under
PMLA, 2002.
(b) ED office has handed over immovable properties + assets (both) to PSUs worth INR
15,113.90 crore + balance worth INR 3,997.29 crore handed over to govt. of India
(c) Consortium of banks as led by SBI has realized worth INR 7,975.27 crore through dispose of
immovable properties + assets (both) already handed over by ED office to PSBs.
5. Role of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for PMLA, 2002 in India
(i) (a) FATF is set up in 1989 as inter–governmental policy–making body to prepare the international
standards with aim to prevent illegal activities like Money Laundering (ML) + Terrorist Financing
(TF) + Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
(b) Main Objective for set up of FATF to prepare the international standards to promote
effective implementation of legal + regulatory + operational measures for combating the ML +
TF + WMD + other related threats to integrity of international financial system.
(c) FATF has reviewed the ML + TF + WMD techniques of member countries + continuously
strengthening the international standards to address the new risks like regulation of virtual
assets + etc.
(ii) (a) India has enacted PMLA, 2002 + made applicable from July 01, 2005 after receiving
recommendation from FATF
(b) Govt. of India has entrusted the ED office with responsibility of monitoring of execution the
provisions of PMLA, 2002.
(d) Now exceeding the 200 countries + jurisdictions are committed to implement the
recommendations + international standards (both) set up by FATF.
(iii) FATF is conducting mutual evaluations of member countries through evaluating the levels of
implementation of FATF recommendations.
(b) Relevant links related to FATF in general + mutual evaluation of India are following:-
(i) Red Corner Notices to be issued by CBI from India against fugitives (offenders) for prosecution or
to serve an imprisonment in India.
(ii) Red Corner Notice a request to law enforcement agencies outside India to locate + provisionally
arrest a person pending for extradition or surrender or similar legal action in India.
(iii) INTERPOL has designated a National Central Bureau (NCB) in 195 member countries as single
point of communication between law enforcement agency of member country like CBI (NCB) for
India and agency (NCB) for other member country.
(iv) Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is officially designated as NCB of India as entrusted with
responsibility to publish + to maintain + to update the Red Corner Notices against fugitives
(offenders) requested by Law enforcement agencies of India from time to time.
(iv) Link of official website of CBI to view the Red Corner Notice as issued by CBI is (
https://cbi.gov.in/interpol-red-notice).
7. Powers + Role of Chief Vigilance Officer (CVO) located at ED office, New Delhi
(ii) Special Director of ED Headquarter Office (HO) is part–time CVO from ED officers not below
the level of Additional Director of Enforcement (ADE).
(iii) 100% complaints against Officers of ED office to be send to CVO as alleging fraudulent acts +
corrupt acts + abuse of official position + Gross or willful negligence + flagrant violation of systems
and procedures + etc.
Summon Number
Pass-code
Captcha
2 procedures are permitted for verification of authenticity of system generated summon with QR
code + unique Pass–code (both) after 24 hour of receipt of summon excluding public holiday +
Saturday + Sunday.
Following steps to be obeyed for verification of authenticity of system generated summon through
scanning QR code
Step-I Scan QR code as printed on summon to redirect the user to ED’s website page
Enter the unique Pass-code as printed on summon in given field on web page as opened after
Step-II scanning QR code
If details as entered are correct the contents of summon like Name of party + name an
Step-III designation of officer + date of summon will be shown on screen for verification of authenticit
of summon
Following steps to be followed for verification of authenticity of system generated summon through
entering the details of summon on official website of ED
Enter the summon no. as mentioned on top of summon + unique Pass–code as printed on
Step-II bottom of summon in respective fields
If details as entered are correct the contents of summon like Name of party + name and
Step-III designation of officer + date of summon will be shown on screen for verification of authenticit
of summon
c) Verification of summon as not generated through system (in exceptional circumstance only) + for
any other query about verification of summon the following designated officer to be contacted on
telephone or email.
1. Statics for cases as recorded + PAOs issued + ETC under PMLA on March 31, 2022
Total number or
S.No. Description of Subject
INR in crore
(i) Number of Cases as recorded for investigations 5422
(ii) Number of Provisional Attachments Orders (PAOs) issued 1739
(iii) Value of Assets under attachments 104702
(iv) Number of PAOs as confirmed by Adjudicating Authorities 1369
(v) Value of assets under PAOs as confirmed by Adjudicating Authority 58591
(vi) Number of Persons as arrested 400
(vii) Number of Prosecution Complaints number of cases filed + under trial (both) 992
(viii) Number of Persons finally convicted 25
2. Statics for cases as initiated + disposed +adjudicated under FEMA on March 31, 2022
Total number/ T
S.No. Particulars
in crore
(i) Cases as initiated for investigations 30716
(ii) Cases as disposed against Investigations 15495
(iii) Cases where Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued 8109
(iv) Cases where SCNs as adjudicated 6472
3. Statics for Cases as investigated + declared FEO + etc. under FEOA on March 31, 2022
Total number/ T
S.No. Particulars
in crore
(i) Cases as initiated for investigations 14
(ii) Number of persons as declared FEO 9
(iii) Amount of properties as confiscated 433
–
5. Office of Patna Zone at Patna
(i) Yaduraj Singh Joint Director +91-612-2219155
–
14. Office of Kohima Sub Zone at Kohima
(i) Ranveer Singh Tanwar Deputy Director +91-361-2967355
–
23. Office of Jalandhar Zone at Jalandhar
(i) Amit Dua Additional Director +91-181-2346203
–
28. Office of Southern Region at Chennai
(i) Prashant Kumar Special Director +91-44-28255051
29. Office of Chennai Zone I and II at Chennai
(i) K. Jayaganesh Joint Director +91-44-28299711
(ii) Piyush Yadav Joint Director —-
30. Office of Hyderabad Zone at Hyderabad
(i) Rohit Anand Joint Director +91-40-23296133
31. Office of Bengaluru Zone at Bengaluru
(i) Manish Godara Joint Director +91-80-22537801
32. Office of Kochi Zone at Kochi
(i) Dinesh Paruchhuri Additional Director +91-484-2350401
33. Office of Madurai Sub Zone at Madurai
(i) Shubham Agarwal Deputy Director +91-452-2643466
34. Office of Kozhikode Sub Zone at Kozhikode
(i) Ravi Bhushan Deputy Director +91-495-2324316
JOINT DIRECTOR
SOD
DIRECTOR
Special director
Special director Special director Special director Special director Special director Special director
headquar-ter office intellige-nce adjudica-tion western region northern region southern region
HIU
Joint Director
Joint Director System Joint Director Adjud- Joint Director Mumbai Joint Director Joint Director Che
Coordination Joint Director HIU-1 ication
& Training zone-i Chandigarh zone-i zone-i
Joint Director
Joint Director Intell- Joint Director Mumbai Joint Director Joint Director Che
Vigilance & est. Joint Director HIU-2 zone-ii
igence Chandigarh zone-ii zone-ii
Joint Director
Panaji
DLA (HO)-1 Joint Director Srinagar Joint Director Kotc
zone zone zone
DLA
Joint Director Bhopal Joint Director Joint Director
zone Jalandhar zone Bengaluru zone
(HO)-2
Deputy Director
1. Aizwal
2. Agartala
Joint Director
Joint Director Deputy Director Deputy Director
3. Imphal
Raipur zone
Jaipur zone Manglore sub zone Prayagraj sub zone
4. Itanagar
5. Kohima
6. Shilong
Indore sub zone Shimla sub zone Kozhikode sub zone Gangtok sub zone
Deputy Director
Deputy Director Deputy Director
Vishakhapat-nam sub
Surat sub zone Dehradun sub zone
zone
Deputy Director
Deputy Director
Deputy Director
Jammu sub zone
Nagpur sub zone
Madurai sub zone
*****
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. Neither this article nor the
information’s as contained herein constitutes a contract or will form the basis of a contract. The material
contained in this article does not constitute or substitute professional advice that may be required before acting
on any matter. While every care has been taken in the preparation of this article to ensure its accuracy at the time
of publication. Satish Agarwal assumes no responsibility for any error which despite all precautions may be
found herein. We shall not be liable for direct, indirect or consequential damages if any arising out of or in any
way connected with the use of this article or the informations as contained herein.