Pccet Study Guide
Pccet Study Guide
Study Guide
June 2022
You can read through this study guide from start to finish, or you may jump straight to topics you would
like to study. Hyperlinked cross-references will help you locate important definitions and background
information from earlier sections.
More information is available from the Palo Alto Networks public page at:
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education/certification
Exam Format
The test format is 90-100 multiple-choice items. Candidates will have five minutes to complete the
Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), 80 minutes to complete the questions, and five minutes to complete
a survey at the end of the exam.
The approximate distribution of items by topic (Exam Domain) and topic weightings are shown in the
following table.
TOTAL 100%
The exam is available through the third-party Pearson VUE testing platform.
To register for the exam, visit: https://home.pearsonvue.com/paloaltonetworks
Disclaimer
This study guide is intended to provide information about the objectives covered by this exam, related
resources, and recommended courses. The material contained within this study guide is not intended
to guarantee that a passing score will be achieved on the exam. Palo Alto Networks recommends that
candidates thoroughly understand the objectives indicated in this guide and use the resources and
courses recommended in this guide where needed to gain that understanding.
Skills Required
● You understand basic networking concepts (subnetting; protocols; differences between network
components such as routers, switches, and hubs; etc).
Recommended Training
Cyber Security Foundation digital learning courses:
Note: The terms “enterprise” and “business” are used throughout this guide to describe organizations,
networks, and applications in general. The use of these terms is not intended to exclude other types of
organizations, networks, or applications, and should be understood to include not only large businesses
and enterprises but also small and medium-size businesses (SMBs), government, state-owned
enterprises (SOEs), public services, military, healthcare, and nonprofits, among others.
Key Terms
● An attack (or threat) vector is a path or tool that an attacker uses to target a
network.
1.1 Distinguish between Web 2.0 and 3.0 applications and services
The nature of enterprise computing has changed dramatically over the past decade. Core business
applications now are commonly installed alongside Web 2.0 apps on a variety of endpoints, and
networks that were originally designed to share files and printers are now used to collect massive
volumes of data, exchange real-time information, transact online business, and enable global
collaboration.
Many Web 2.0 apps are available as software-as-a-service (SaaS), web-based, or mobile apps that can be
easily installed by end users or that can be run without installing any local programs or services on the
endpoint.
Key Idea
● Web 2.0 is a term popularized by Tim O’Reilly and Dale Dougherty that
unofficially refers to a new era of the World Wide Web, which is characterized by
dynamic or user-generated content, interaction, and collaboration, and the
growth of social media.
● An endpoint is a computing device such as a desktop or laptop computer,
handheld scanner, internet of things (IoT) device or sensor (such as an
autonomous vehicle, smart appliance, smart meter, smart TV, or wearable
device), point-of-sale (POS) terminal, printer, satellite radio, security or video
conferencing camera, self-service kiosk, smartphone, tablet, or Voice over
Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone. Although endpoints can include servers and
network equipment, the term is generally used to describe end-user devices.
● The internet of things (IoT) is the network of physical smart objects that are
embedded with electronics, software, sensors, and network connectivity to
collect and share data.
● Voice over IP (VoIP), or IP telephony, is technology that provides voice
communication over an IP-based network.
● Software as a service (SaaS) is a category of cloud computing services in
which the customer is provided access to a hosted application that is
maintained by the service provider.
● Enterprise 2.0 is a term introduced by Andrew McAfee and defined as “the use
of emergent social software platforms within companies, or between
companies and their partners or customers.”
● Accounting software is used to process and record accounting data and transactions such as
accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, trial balances, and general ledger (GL) entries.
Examples of accounting software include Intacct, Microsoft Dynamics AX and GP, NetSuite,
QuickBooks, and Sage.
● Business intelligence (BI) and business analytics software consists of tools and techniques
used to surface large amounts of raw unstructured data from a variety of sources (such as data
warehouses and data marts). BI and business analytics software performs a variety of functions,
including business performance management, data mining, event processing, and predictive
analytics. Examples of BI and analytics software include IBM Cognos, MicroStrategy, Oracle
Hyperion, and SAP.
● Content management systems (CMS) and enterprise content management (ECM) systems
are used to store and organize files from a central management interface, with features such as
indexing, publishing, search, workflow management, and versioning. Examples of CMS and ECM
software include EMC Documentum, HP Autonomy, Microsoft SharePoint, and OpenText.
● Customer relationship management (CRM) software is used to manage an organization’s
customer (or client) information, including lead validation, past sales, communication and
interaction logs, and service history. Examples of CRM suites include Microsoft Dynamics CRM,
Salesforce.com, SugarCRM, and ZOHO.
● Database management systems (DBMS) are used to administer databases, including the
schemas, tables, queries, reports, views, and other objects that comprise a database. Examples
of DBMS software include Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, NoSQL, and Oracle Database.
Common Web 2.0 apps and services (many of which also are SaaS apps) include:
● File sync and sharing services are used to manage, distribute, and provide access to online
content, such as documents, images, music, software, and video. Examples include Apple iCloud,
Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Spotify, and YouTube.
● Instant messaging (IM) is used to exchange short messages in real time. Examples include
Facebook Messenger, Skype, Snapchat, and WhatsApp.
● Microblogging web services allow a subscriber to broadcast short messages to other
subscribers. Examples include Tumblr and Twitter.
● Office productivity suites consist of cloud-based word processing, spreadsheet, and
presentation software. Examples include Google Apps and Microsoft Office 365.
● Remote access software is used for remote sharing and control of an endpoint, typically for
collaboration or troubleshooting. Examples include LogMeIn and TeamViewer.
● Remote team meeting software is used for audio conferencing, video conferencing, and screen
sharing. Examples include Adobe Connect, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom.
● Social curation shares collaborative content about particular topics. Social bookmarking is a
type of social curation. Examples include Instagram, Pinterest, and Reddit.
● Social networks are used to share content with business or personal contacts. Examples include
Facebook, Google Currents, and LinkedIn.
● Web-based email is an internet email service that typically is accessed via a web browser.
Examples include Gmail, Outlook.com, and Yahoo! Mail.
● Wikis enable users to contribute, collaborate, and edit site content. Examples include Socialtext
and Wikipedia.
According to research from McKinsey & Company and the Association for Information and Image
Management (AIIM), many organizations are recognizing significant benefits from the use of Enterprise
2.0 applications and technologies, including better collaboration, increased knowledge sharing, and
reduced expenses (for example, for travel, operations, and communications). Thus, enterprise
infrastructures (systems, applications, and networks) are rapidly converging with personal and Web 2.0
● Cloud computing: Cloud computing now is more pervasive than ever. According to the
RightScale 2019 State of the Cloud Report from Flexera, public and private cloud adoption is now
at 94 percent for enterprises (1,000+ employees) and SMBs (fewer than 1,000 employees), and
those companies run a majority of their workloads (about 79 percent) in the cloud. Also, 84
percent of enterprises and 61 percent of SMBs have a multicloud strategy leveraging an average
of nearly five public and/or private clouds. Similarly, the Enterprise Strategy Group RightScale
report found that production server workloads increasingly run on a mix of cloud-ready
architectures, including virtual machines (34 percent), containers (23 percent), and serverless (15
percent).
● Consumerization: The process of consumerization occurs as end users increasingly find
personal technology and apps that are more powerful or capable, more convenient, less
expensive, quicker to install, and easier to use than enterprise IT solutions.
● Bring your own device (BYOD): Closely related to consumerization is BYOD, a policy trend in
which organizations permit end users to use their own personal devices, primarily smartphones
and tablets, for work-related purposes. BYOD relieves organizations from the cost of providing
equipment to employees but creates a management challenge because of the vast number and
type of devices that must be supported.
● Bring your own apps (BYOA): Web 2.0 apps on personal devices are increasingly being used for
work-related purposes. As the boundary between work and personal lives becomes less distinct,
end users are practically demanding that these same apps be available to them in their
workplaces.
● Mobile computing: The appetite for rapid, on-demand access to apps and data from anywhere,
at any time, on any device is growing. There are approximately more than 8 billion mobile
subscriptions worldwide, and total mobile monthly data traffic (including audio, file sharing,
social networking, software uploads and downloads, video, web browsing, and other sources) is
about 40 exabytes!
● 5G cellular wireless: Each new generation of wireless connectivity has driven many innovations,
and the move to the fifth-generation of cellular wireless (5G) is well under way, with mobile
network operators announcing 5G pilot trials and commercialization plans as they expand their
geographic footprints. The latest 5G applications are consumer-driven, help governments
implement 5G for smart city rollouts, and bring 5G service experience to the public by seamlessly
covering major sports events, among others. The promise of intelligent connectivity will drive
massive adoption of the internet of things (IoT) and could transform industries. We’re now
describing the Enterprise of Things: networked industrial devices, sensors, networks, and apps
that connect businesses. As today’s enterprises undergo digital transformation, they’ll be looking
for 5G networks to drive true Industry 4.0 transformation, leveraging automation, artificial
intelligence (AI), and IoT.
● Content delivery networks (CDN): Enterprises are using content delivery networks such as
Akamai, Amazon CloudFront, and Limelight networks to distribute their web products and
services to customers worldwide. The use of CDNs will become even more prominent as 5G
adoption continues to expand.
For many, the vision of Web 3.0 is to return the power of the internet to individual users, in much the
same way that the original Web 1.0 was envisioned. To some extent, Web 2.0 has become shaped and
characterized, if not controlled, by governments and large corporations dictating the content that is
made available to individuals and raising many concerns about individual security, privacy, and liberty.
Specific technologies that are evolving and beginning to form the foundations of Web 3.0 include:
● AI and machine learning are two related technologies that enable systems to understand and
act on information in much the same way that a human might use information. AI acquires and
applies knowledge to find the most optimal solution, decision, or course of action. Machine
learning is a subset of AI that applies algorithms to large datasets to discover common patterns
in the data that then can be used to improve the performance of the system.
● Blockchain is essentially a data structure containing transactional records (stored as blocks) that
ensures security and transparency through a vast, decentralized peer-to-peer network with no
single controlling authority. Cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin, is an example of a blockchain
application.
● Data mining enables patterns to be discovered in large datasets through the use of machine
learning, statistical analysis, and database technologies.
● Mixed reality includes technologies such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and
extended reality (XR) that deliver an immersive and interactive physical and digital sensory
experience in real time.
● Natural language search is the ability to understand human spoken language and context to
find information, as opposed to a Boolean search, for example.
Organizations often are unsure of the potential business benefits, and the inherent risks, of new trends
such as Web 2.0 and Web 3.0, and therefore either:
● Implicitly allow personal technologies and apps by simply ignoring their use in the workplace, or
● Explicitly prohibit their use but then are unable to effectively enforce such policies with
traditional firewalls and security technologies
Regardless of whether personal technologies and apps are implicitly allowed (and ignored) or explicitly
prohibited (but not enforced), the adverse results of ineffective policies include:
● Lost productivity because users must either find ways to integrate these unsupported
technologies and apps (when allowed) with the enterprise infrastructure or use applications that
are unfamiliar to them or less efficient (when personal technologies and apps are prohibited)
● Potential disruption of critical business operations because of underground or back-channel
processes that are used to accomplish specific workflow tasks or to circumvent controls, and are
known to only a few users and are fully dependent on their use of personal technologies and
apps
● Exposure to additional risks for the enterprise due to unknown, and therefore unpatched,
vulnerabilities in personal technologies and apps, and a perpetual wait-and-see game between
employees that circumvent controls (for example, with external proxies, encrypted tunnels, and
remote desktop applications) and security teams that manage these risks.
● Penalties can be levied against organizations for non-compliance of regulations from
groups such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the U.S. Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Payment Card Industry Data Security
Standard (PCI DSS).
As these trends continue to blur the distinction between the internet and the enterprise network, new
security challenges and risks emerge, including:
A port scan is a method for determining which ports on a network are open. As ports on a computer are
the place where information is sent and received, port scanning is analogous to knocking on doors to
see if someone is home. Running a port scan on a network or server reveals which ports are open and
listening (receiving information), as well as revealing the presence of security devices such as firewalls
that are present between the sender and the target. This technique is known as fingerprinting. It is also
valuable for testing network security and the strength of the system’s firewall. Due to this functionality,
it is also a popular reconnaissance tool for attackers seeking a weak point of access to break into a
computer.
There are standard services offered on ports after 1023 as well, and ports that, if open, indicate an
infected system due to its popularity with some far-reaching Trojans and viruses.
● Vanilla– the most basic scan; an attempt to connect to all 65,536 ports one at a time. A vanilla
scan is a full connect scan, meaning it sends a SYN flag (request to connect) and upon receiving
a SYN-ACK (acknowledgement of connection) response, sends back an ACK flag. This SYN,
SYN-ACK, ACK exchange comprises a TCP handshake. Full connect scans are accurate, but very
easily detected because full connections are always logged by firewalls.
● SYN Scan– Also referred to as a half-open scan, it only sends a SYN, and waits for a SYN-ACK
response from the target. If a response is received, the scanner never responds. Since the TCP
connection was not completed, the system doesn’t log the interaction, but the sender has
learned if the port is open or not.
● XMAS and FIN Scans– an example of a suite of scans used to gather information without being
logged by the target system. In a FIN scan, an unsolicited FIN flag (used normally to end an
established session) will be sent to a port. The system’s response to this random flag can reveal
the state of the port or insight about the firewall. For example, a closed port that receives an
unsolicited FIN packet, will respond with a RST (an instantaneous abort) packet, but an open
port will ignore it. An XMAS scan simply sends a set of all the flags, creating a nonsensical
interaction. The system’s response can be interpreted to better understand the system’s ports
and firewall.
● FTP Bounce Scan– allows for the sender’s location to be disguised by bouncing the packet
through an FTP server. This is also designed for the sender to go undetected.
● Sweep scan– pings the same port across a number of computers to identify which computers
on the network are active. This does not reveal information about the port’s state, instead it tells
the sender which systems on a network are active. Thus, it can be used as a preliminary scan.
Scans that are developed for the sender to go undetected by a receiving system’s log are known as
stealth scans and are of particular interest to attackers. Despite its popularity in this area, port scanning
is a valuable tool for fingerprinting a network and for a penetration tester to assess the strength of
network security.
1.2.3 References
● Port Scan, https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-a-port-scan
Exploitation of vulnerabilities in core business applications has long been an attack vector, but threat
actors are constantly developing new tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). Enterprise security
teams that want to effectively protect their networks and cloud environment must not only manage
the risks associated with a relatively limited, known set of core applications, but they must also manage
the risks associated with an ever-increasing number of known and unknown cloud-based applications.
Cloud-based application consumption models have revolutionized the way organizations do business,
and applications such as Microsoft Office 365 and Salesforce are being consumed and updated entirely
in the cloud.
For example, many organizations use social networking applications such as Facebook for important
business functions, such as recruiting, research and development, marketing, and consumer advocacy.
However, these same applications can be used to leak sensitive information or cause damage to an
organization’s public image, whether inadvertently or maliciously.
Many applications are designed to circumvent traditional port-based firewalls so that they can be easily
installed and accessed on any device, anywhere and anytime, using techniques such as:
● Port hopping, in which ports and protocols are randomly changed during a session.
● Using non-standard ports, such as running Yahoo! Messenger over TCP port 80 (HTTP) instead
of the standard TCP port for Yahoo! Messenger (5050).
● Tunneling within commonly used services, such as when peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing or an
instant messenger (IM) client such as Meebo is running over HTTP.
● Hiding within SSL encryption, which masks the application traffic, for example, over TCP port
443 (HTTPS). More than half of all web traffic is now encrypted.
Many traditional client-server business applications also are being redesigned for web use and employ
these same techniques for ease of operation while minimizing disruptions. For example, both remote
procedure call (RPC) and Microsoft SharePoint use port hopping because it is critical to how the
protocol or application (respectively) functions, rather than as a means to evade detection or enhance
accessibility.
Key Terms
● “The story of Heartbleed’s impact has been focused on the compromise of HTTPS-enabled
websites and web applications, such as Yahoo!, Google, Dropbox, Facebook, online banking,
and the thousands of other vulnerable targets on the web. These are of huge impact, but those
sites will all be updated quickly….
● “For security professionals, [the initial Heartbleed attack] is only the tip of the iceberg. The
vulnerability puts the tools once reserved for truly advanced threats into the hands of the
average attacker – notably, the ability to breach organizations, and move laterally within them.
Most enterprises of even moderate size do not have a good handle on what services they are
running internally using SSL encryption. Without this baseline knowledge, it is extremely
difficult for security teams to harden their internal attack surface against the credential and
data stealing tools Heartbleed enables. All footholds for the attacker with an enterprise
network are suddenly of equal value.”
As new applications are increasingly web-enabled and browser-based, HTTP and HTTPS now account
for about two-thirds of all enterprise network traffic. Traditional port-based firewalls and other security
infrastructure cannot distinguish whether these applications, riding on HTTP and HTTPS, are being
used for legitimate business purposes.
1.3.1 References
● Simkin, Scott. “Real-world Impact of Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160): The Web is Just the Start.” Palo
Alto Networks. April 2014,
https://researchcenter.paloaltonetworks.com/2014/04/real-world-impact-heartbleed-cve-2014-01
60-web-just-start
Cloud computing is not a location but rather a pool of resources that can be rapidly provisioned in
an automated, on-demand manner.
NIST defines three distinct cloud computing service models:
1.4.1 SaaS
Software as a service (SaaS): Customers are provided access to an application running on a cloud
infrastructure. The application is accessible from various client devices and interfaces, but the customer
has no knowledge of, and does not manage or control, the underlying cloud infrastructure. The
customer may have access to limited user-specific application settings, and security of the customer
data still is the responsibility of the customer.
1.4.2 PaaS
Platform as a service (PaaS): Customers can deploy supported applications onto the provider’s cloud
infrastructure, but the customer has no knowledge of, and does not manage or control, the underlying
cloud infrastructure. The customer has control over the deployed applications and limited configuration
settings for the application-hosting environment. The company owns the deployed applications and
data, and therefore it is responsible for the security of those applications and data.
1.4.4 References
● Cloud Security Service, Cloud Storage and Cloud Technology,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/cloud-security-service-cloud-storage-and-cloud-t
echnology
Supply chain management (SCM) software is used to manage supply chain transactions, supplier
relationships, and various business processes, such as purchase order processing, inventory
management, and warehouse management. SCM software is commonly integrated with ERP
systems. Examples of SCM software include Fishbowl Inventory, Freightview, Infor Supply Chain
Management, and Sage X3.
Around the world, governments as well as private sector organizations are focused on identifying and
mitigating risks to the information and communications technology (ICT) supply chain. In fact, efforts to
disrupt or exploit supply chains have become, in the words of a senior US Homeland Security
Department official, a “principal attack vector” for adversarial nations seeking to take advantage of
vulnerabilities for espionage, sabotage or other malicious activities. In this environment, strong supply
chain security practices are a differentiator for critical infrastructure organizations. But what, exactly,
does a strong supply chain security program look like? Recently, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published a case study highlighting how Palo
Alto Networks uses supply chain best practices.
The case study identified several best practices that collectively contribute to the overall supply chain
security efforts of Palo Alto Networks. Among them:
● An organizational focus on end-to-end risk management. We identify supply chain risks across
our entire product lifecycle – design, sourcing, manufacturing, fulfillment and service – and take
proactive action to ensure the integrity of our products. Risk assessments are performed early in
the product development lifecycle to help determine the feasibility of product design decisions.
● Strong supplier management, focused on security requirements as well as establishing
collaborative relationships to ensure a complete view of suppliers’ security posture.
● Hardware manufacturing and order fulfillment processes that enable us to more easily manage
personnel and facility and product security. In fact, we regularly consider geopolitical
implications when making decisions to forgo suppliers and manufacturing locations because it’s
simply the right decision for product security.
1.5.1 References
● NIST Highlights Palo Alto Networks Supply Chain Best Practices,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2020/06/policy-supply-chain-best-practices/
1.6 Describe the vulnerabilities associated with data being stored in the SaaS environment
● Role Based- This allows custom roles you can configure for more granular access control over the
functional areas of the web interface, CLI, and XML API. For example, you can create an Admin
Role profile for your operations staff that provides access to the firewall and network
configuration areas of the web interface, then create a separate profile for your security
administrators that provides access to security policy definitions, logs, and reports. On a firewall
with multiple virtual systems, you can select whether the role defines access for all virtual
systems or specific virtual systems. When new features are added to the product, you must
update the roles with corresponding access privileges because the firewall does not
automatically add new features to custom role definitions.
● Dynamic- These include built-in roles that provide access to the firewall. When new features are
added, the firewall automatically updates the definitions of dynamic roles; you never need to
manually update them..
● Discover employee use of unvetted SaaS applications. As SaaS adoption rapidly expands,
manual discovery of SaaS use in the enterprise becomes increasingly untenable. Instead, to
quickly identify risk and extend appropriate security controls, your organization needs an
automated way to continuously discover all SaaS applications in use by employees.
● Protect sensitive data in SaaS applications. Implement advanced DLP capabilities using an
application programming interface (API)-based approach to scan for sensitive information
stored within SaaS applications. Compared to inline, an API-based approach provides deeper
context and allows for automatic remediation of data-risk violations.
● Secure your weakest link: SaaS users. Start with user training and interactive coaching to
identify and help change risky behavior. Then, give your security team tools to help them
monitor and govern SaaS application permissions. Look for a solution with robust access
controls, including:
o Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
o Role-based access control (RBAC)
o Protection for administrative accounts
o User access monitoring that can detect malicious or risky behavior
● Enforce compliance requirements in the cloud. Create and enforce a consistent, granular
security policy for compliance that covers all SaaS applications used by your organization.
Security policy enforcement should include automating compliance and reporting for all
relevant regulatory requirements across your SaaS applications.
● Reduce risk from unmanaged devices. Deploy a security product that differentiates access
between managed and unmanaged devices to protect against the increased security risks
inherent with personal devices. For instance, you could allow downloads to managed devices
but block them for unmanaged devices while enabling access to core functionality.
● Control data sharing from SaaS applications. Use an inline approach to gain visibility into
sensitive data flowing into high-risk, unsanctioned applications. Create and enforce DLP policies
that control data-sharing activities in the SaaS applications employees use.
● Stop SaaS-borne malware threats. Implement threat prevention technology that works with
your SaaS security to block malware and stop threats from spreading through SaaS applications,
thus eliminating a new insertion point for malware.
Key Terms
Compliance is based on the type of data held and stored by the company and what regulatory
requirements (frameworks) apply to its protection. Compliance means ensuring that the organization
complies with the minimum security-related requirements.
Security is a clear set of technological programs and tools and processes in place to protect and secure
business information and technology assets.
● Australian Privacy Principles: The Privacy Act 1988 establishes standards for collecting and
handling personal information, referred to as the Australian Privacy Principles (APP).
● California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): This privacy rights and consumer protection statute
for residents of California was enacted in 2018 and became effective on January 1, 2020.
● Canada Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA): PIPEDA
defines individual rights with respect to the privacy of their personal information and governs
how private sector organizations collect, use, and disclose personal information in the course of
business.
● EU Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive: An EU directive that imposes network
and information security requirements for banks, energy companies, healthcare providers, and
digital service providers, among others.
● European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): The GDPR applies to any
organization that does business with EU residents. It strengthens data protection for EU
residents and addresses the export of personal data outside the EU.
1.7.3 References
Mayes, Michael. “Top 10 Ransomware Stories of 2019.” CPO Magazine. December 27, 2019,
https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/top-10-ransomware-stories-of2019/
The MITRE ATT&CK™ framework is a comprehensive matrix of tactics and techniques designed for
threat hunters, defenders, and red teams to help classify attacks, identify attack attribution and
objective, and assess an organization's risk. Organizations can use the framework to identify security
gaps and prioritize mitigations based on risk.
MITRE’s approach is focused on articulating how detections occur rather than assigning scores to
vendor capabilities. MITRE categorizes each detection and capture. Detections are then organized
according to each technique. Techniques may have more than one detection if the capability detects
the technique in different ways, and detections they observe are included in the results. While MITRE
makes every effort to capture different detections, vendor capabilities may be able to detect procedures
in ways that MITRE did not capture.
For a detection to be included for a given technique, the detection must apply to that technique
specifically. For example, just because a detection applies to one technique in a step or sub-step, that
does not mean it applies to all techniques of that step.
Key Idea
● For proof of detection in each category, MITRE requires that the proof be
provided to it, but it may not include all detection details in public results,
particularly when those details are sensitive.
To determine the appropriate category for a detection, MITRE reviews the screenshot(s) provided, notes
taken during the evaluation, results of follow-up questions to the vendor, and vendor feedback on draft
results.
MITRE also independently tests procedures in a separate lab environment as well as reviews
open-source tool detections and forensic artifacts. This testing informs what is considered a detection
for each technique. After performing detection categorizations, MITRE calibrates the categories across
all vendors to look for discrepancies and ensure categories are applied consistently.
An indicator of compromise (IoC) is a network or operating system (OS) artifact that provides a high
level of confidence that a computer security incident has occurred.
In many cases these are brittle and easy for adversaries to bypass by modifying malware or
infrastructure. Indicators like file hashes, IP addresses, and domain names have become the focal point
for many network defenders, yet each of these are trivial for an adversary to change in order to avoid
detection. In addition, the defending organization needs to have access to relevant and up-to-date
indicators through a threat indicator sharing program or commercial data feed, all of which may still
not ensure that defenders are able to keep pace with adversary changes.
To evaluate the extent and severity of each CVE across your endpoints, you can drill down into each CVE
in Cortex XDR and view all the endpoints and applications in your environment impacted by the CVE.
Cortex XDR retrieves the latest information from the NIST public database. From Add-ons > Host
Insights > Vulnerability Assessment, select CVEs on the upper-right bar. For each vulnerability, Cortex
XDR displays the following default and optional values:
VALUE DESCRIPTION
Affected endpoints The number of endpoints that are currently affected by this
CVE. For excluded CVEs, the affected endpoints are N/A.
Excluded Indicates whether this CVE is excluded from all endpoint and
application views and filters, and from all Host Insights
widgets.
Platforms The name and version of the operating system affected by this
CVE.
Severity The severity level (Critical, High, Medium, or Low) of the CVE as
ranked in the NIST database.
Severity score The CVE severity score is based on the NIST Common
Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). Click the score to see the
full CVSS description.
Key Idea
● You can click each individual CVE to view in-depth details about it on a panel
that appears on the right.
● View CVE details—Left-click the CVE to view in-depth details about it on a panel that
appears on the right. Use the in-panel links as needed.
● View a complete list of all endpoints in your network impacted by a CVE—Right-click the
CVE and then select View affected endpoints.
● Learn more about the applications in your network that are impacted by a
CVE—Right-click the CVE and then select View applications.
● Exclude irrelevant CVEs from your endpoints and applications analysis—Right-click the
CVE and then select Exclude. You can add a comment if needed, as well as Report CVE as
incorrect for further analysis and investigation by Palo Alto Networks. The CVE is grayed out,
labeled Excluded, and no longer appears on the Endpoints and Applications views in
Vulnerability Assessment or in the Host Insights widgets. To restore the CVE, right-click the
CVE and Undo exclusion at any time.
1.8.4 References
● What is the MITRE ATT&CK Framework?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-mitre-attack-framework#:~:text=The%20
MITRE%20
ATT%26CK%E2%84%A2%20framework,and%20assess%20an%20organization's%20risk.
● MITRE ATT&CK — Courses of Action, https://xsoar.pan.dev/docs/reference/packs/courses-of-action
1.9.1 Describe the different value levels of the information that need protection (political, financial,
etc.)
In modern cyber warfare you must understand the strengths, weaknesses, strategies, and tactics of
your adversary, including their means and motivations.
Key Terms
● The term hacker was originally used to refer to anyone with highly specialized
computing skills, without connoting good or bad purposes. However, common
misuse of the term has redefined a hacker as someone who circumvents
computer security with malicious intent, such as a cybercriminal, cyberterrorist,
or hacktivist, cracker, and/or black hat.
● A script kiddie is someone with limited hacking and/or programming skills
who uses malicious programs (malware) written by others to attack a computer
or network.
External threat actors include organized crime, state-affiliated groups, activists, former employees, and
other unaffiliated or otherwise unknown attackers and account for the majority of data breaches.
1.9.2 References
● Lillian Ablon, Martin Libicki, and Andrea Golay. “Markets for Cybercrime Tools and Stolen Data.”
RAND Corporation, National Security Research Division. 2014,
https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR600/RR610/RAND_R R610.pdf
● Zheng, Denise E. “Global Forecast 2016: Disrupting the Cyber Status Quo.” Center for Strategic
and International Studies. November 16, 2015,
https://www.csis.org/analysis/disrupting-cyber-status-quo
● “2019 Data Breach Investigations Report.” Verizon Enterprise Solutions. 2019,
https://www.enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/dbir/
Modern cyberattack strategy has evolved from a direct attack against a high-value server or asset
(“shock and awe”) to a patient, multistep process that blends exploits, malware, stealth, and evasion in a
coordinated network attack (“low and slow”). The cyberattack lifecycle (see following figure) illustrates
the sequence of events that an attacker goes through to infiltrate a network and exfiltrate (or steal)
valuable data. Blocking of just one step breaks the chain and can effectively defend an organization’s
network and data against an attack.
1. Reconnaissance: Like common criminals, attackers meticulously plan their cyberattacks. They
research, identify, and select targets, often extracting public information from targeted
employees’ social media profiles or from corporate websites, which can be useful for social
engineering and phishing schemes. Attackers also will scan for network vulnerabilities, services,
and applications that they can exploit by using tools such as:
● Network analyzers (also known as packet analyzers, protocol analyzers, or packet
sniffers) are used to monitor and capture raw network traffic (packets). Examples include
tcpdump and Wireshark (formerly Ethereal).
● Network vulnerability scanners typically consist of a suite of tools including password
crackers, port scanners, and vulnerability scanners and are used to probe a network for
vulnerabilities (including configuration errors) that can be exploited. Examples include
Nessus and SAINT.
● Password crackers are used to perform brute-force dictionary attacks against password
hashes. Examples include John the Ripper and THC Hydra.
● Port scanners are used to probe for open TCP or UDP (including ICMP) ports on an
endpoint. Examples include Nmap (“network mapper”) and Nessus.
● Web application vulnerability scanners are used to scan web applications for
vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and directory traversal. Examples
include Burp Suite and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).
● Wi-Fi vulnerability scanners are used to scan wireless networks for vulnerabilities
(including open and misconfigured access points) to capture wireless network traffic and
to crack wireless passwords. Examples include Aircrack-ng and Wifite.
Breaking the cyberattack lifecycle at this phase of an attack begins with proactive and effective
end-user security awareness training that focuses on topics such as social engineering
techniques (for example, phishing, piggybacking, and shoulder surfing), social media (for
example, safety and privacy issues), and organizational security policies (for example, password
requirements, remote access, and physical security). Another important countermeasure is
continuous monitoring and inspection of network traffic flows to detect and prevent
unauthorized port and vulnerability scans, host sweeps, and other suspicious activity.
● Encryption with SSL, SSH (Secure Shell), or some other custom or proprietary encryption
● Circumvention via proxies, remote access tools, or tunneling. In some instances, use of cellular
networks enables complete circumvention of the target network for attack C2 traffic.
● Port evasion using network anonymizers or port hopping to traverse over any available open
ports
● Fast Flux (or Dynamic DNS) to proxy through multiple infected endpoints or multiple,
ever-changing C2 servers to reroute traffic and make determination of the true destination or
attack source difficult
● DNS tunneling is used for C2 communications and data infiltration (for example, sending
malicious code, commands, or binary files to a victim) and data exfiltration.
Breaking the cyberattack lifecycle at this phase of an attack requires inspection of all network traffic
(including encrypted communications), blocking of outbound C2 communications with anti-C2
signatures (along with file and data pattern uploads), blocking all outbound communications to known
malicious URLs and IP addresses, blocking novel attack techniques that employ port evasion methods,
prevention of the use of anonymizers and proxies on the network, monitoring DNS for malicious
domains and countering with DNS sinkholing or DNS poisoning, and redirecting malicious outbound
communications to honeypots to identify or block compromised endpoints and analyze attack traffic.
1.10.2 References
● “2018 Data Breach Investigations Report, 11th Edition.” Verizon Enterprise Solutions. 2018,
https://enterprise.verizon.com/resources/reports/DBIR_2018_Report.pdf
Malware is malicious software or code that typically takes control of, collects information from, or
damages an infected endpoint. Malware broadly includes:
● Viruses: A virus is malware that is self-replicating but must first infect a host program and be
executed by a user or process.
● Worms: A worm is malware that typically targets a computer network by replicating itself to
spread rapidly. Unlike viruses, worms do not need to infect other programs and do not need to
be executed by a user or process.
● Trojan horses: A trojan horse is malware that is disguised as a harmless program but actually
gives an attacker full control and elevated privileges of an endpoint when installed. Unlike other
types of malware, trojan horses typically are not self-replicating.
● Ransomware: Ransomware is malware that locks a computer or device (Locker ransomware) or
encrypts data (Crypto ransomware) on an infected endpoint with an encryption key that only
the attacker knows, thereby making the data unusable until the victim pays a ransom (usually in
cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin). Reveton and LockeR are two examples of Locker ransomware.
Locky, TeslaCrypt/EccKrypt, Cryptolocker, and Cryptowall are examples of Crypto ransomware.
● Anti-AV: Anti-AV is malware that disables legitimately installed antivirus software on the
compromised endpoint, thereby preventing automatic detection and removal of other malware.
● Logic bombs: A logic bomb is malware triggered by a specified condition, such as a given date
or a particular user account being disabled.
● Back doors: A back door is malware that allows an attacker to bypass authentication to gain
access to a compromised system.
● Root kits: A root kit is malware that provides privileged (root-level) access to a computer. Root
kits are installed in the BIOS of a machine, which means operating system-level security tools
cannot detect them.
● Boot kits: A boot kit is malware that is a kernel-mode variant of a root kit, commonly used to
attack computers that are protected by full-disk encryption.
● Spyware and adware: Spyware and adware are types of malware that collect information, such
as internet surfing behavior, login credentials, and financial account information on an infected
endpoint. Spyware often changes browser and other software settings, and slows computer and
internet speeds on an infected endpoint. Adware is spyware that displays annoying
advertisements on an infected endpoint, often as popup banners.
Early malware typically consisted of viruses that displayed annoying but relatively benign errors,
messages, or graphics.
Key Idea
● The first computer virus was Elk Cloner, written in 1982 by a ninth-grade high school
student near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Elk Cloner was a relatively benign boot sector
virus that displayed a poem on the fiftieth time that an infected floppy disk was
inserted into an Apple II computer.
● The first PC virus was a boot sector virus, written in 1986, called Brain. Brain also was
relatively benign and displayed a message with the actual contact information for the
creators of the virus. Brain was written by two Pakistani brothers who created the
virus so that they could track piracy of their medical software.
● A boot sector virus targets the boot sector or master boot record (MBR) of an
endpoint’s storage drive or other removable storage media.
● A boot sector contains machine code that is loaded into an endpoint’s memory by
firmware during the startup process, before the operating system is loaded.
● A master boot record (MBR) contains information about how the logical partitions
(or file systems) are organized on the storage media and an executable boot loader
that starts up the installed operating system.
● A floppy disk is a removable magnetic storage medium commonly used from the
mid-1970s until about 2007, when it was largely replaced by compact discs and
removable USB storage devices. Floppy disks typically were available in 8-inch,
5¼-inch, and 3½-inch sizes with capacities from 90 kilobytes to 200 megabytes.
One of the first computer worms to gain widespread notoriety was the Morris worm, written by a
Harvard and Cornell University graduate student, Robert Tappan Morris, in 1988. The worm exploited
weak passwords and known vulnerabilities in several Unix programs and spread rapidly across the early
internet (the worm infected up to an estimated 10 percent of all Unix machines connected to the
internet at that time, or about 6,000 computers), sometimes infecting a computer numerous times to
the point that it was rendered useless – an example of an early DoS attack. The U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) estimated the damage caused by the Morris worm between US$100,000
and US$10 million.
Unfortunately, in the more than 35 years since these early examples of malware, modern malware has
evolved and is used for far more sinister purposes. Examples of modern malware include:
● WannaCry: In a period of just 24 hours in May 2017, the WannaCry ransomware attack infected
more than 230,000 vulnerable Windows computers in more than 150 countries worldwide.
Although the attack was quickly halted after the discovery of a “kill switch,” the total economic
damage is estimated between hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars to as much as US$4 billion,
despite the perpetrators collecting only 327 ransom payments totaling about US$130,000.
● HenBox: HenBox typically masquerades as legitimate Android system and VPN apps, and
sometimes drops and installs legitimate versions of other apps as a decoy. The primary goal of
the HenBox apps appears to be to spy on those who install them. By using traits similar to
legitimate apps, for example, copycat iconography and app or package names, HenBox lures
victims into downloading and installing the malicious apps from third-party, non-Google Play
app stores that often have fewer security and vetting procedures for the apps they host. As is the
case with other Android malware, some apps also may be available on forums or file-sharing
sites, or even may be sent to victims as email attachments.
● TeleRAT: Telegram Bots are special accounts that do not require an additional phone number to
set up and generally are used to enrich Telegram chats with content from external services or to
get customized notifications and news. TeleRAT abuses Telegram’s Bot API for C2 and data
exfiltration.
Key Terms
Modern malware typically is stealthy and evasive, and now plays a central role in a coordinated attack
against a target.
Advanced malware leverages networks to gain power and resilience, and can be updated, just like any
other software application, so that an attacker can change course and dig deeper into the network or
make changes and enact countermeasures.
This advanced malware is a fundamental shift compared to earlier types of malware, which generally
were independent agents that simply infected and replicated themselves. Advanced malware
increasingly has become a centrally coordinated, networked application. In much the same way that
the internet changed what was possible in personal computing, ubiquitous network access is changing
what is possible in the world of malware. Now all malware of the same type can work together toward a
common goal, with each infected endpoint expanding the attack foothold and increasing the potential
damage to the organization.
Key Terms
● Polymorphism alters part of the malware code with every iteration, such as the encryption key
or decryption routine, but the malware payload remains unchanged.
● Metamorphism uses more advanced techniques than polymorphism to alter malware code
with each iteration. Although the malware payload changes with each iteration (for example,
by using a different code structure or sequence or by inserting unnecessary code to change
the file size), the fundamental behavior of the malware payload remains unchanged.
● A hash signature is a cryptographic representation of an entire file or program’s source code.
● Obfuscation is a programming technique used to render code unreadable. It can be
implemented by using a simple substitution cipher, such as an exclusive or XOR operation, in
which the output is true only when the inputs are different (for example, TRUE and TRUE
equals FALSE, but TRUE and FALSE equals TRUE), or by using more sophisticated encryption
algorithms, such as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). A packer also can be used to
compress a malware program for delivery and then decompress it in memory at runtime.
An exploit is a type of malware that takes advantage of a vulnerability in installed endpoint or server
software such as a web browser, Adobe Flash, Java, or Microsoft Office. An attacker crafts an exploit that
targets a software vulnerability, causing the software to perform functions or execute code on behalf of
the attacker.
Vulnerabilities routinely are discovered in software at an alarming rate. Vulnerabilities may exist in
software when the software is initially developed and released, or vulnerabilities may be inadvertently
created, or even re-introduced, when subsequent version updates or security patches are installed.
Security patches are developed by software vendors as quickly as possible after a vulnerability has been
discovered in their software. However, an attacker may learn of a vulnerability and begin exploiting it
before the software vendor is aware of the vulnerability or has an opportunity to develop a patch. This
delay between the discovery of a vulnerability and development and release of a patch is known as a
zero-day threat (or exploit). It may be months or years before a vulnerability is announced publicly. After
a security patch becomes available, time inevitably is required for organizations to properly test and
deploy the patch on all affected systems. During this time, a system running the vulnerable software is
at risk of being exploited by an attacker (see figure below).
Creation of an exploit data file is a two-step process. The first step is to embed a small piece of malicious
code within the data file. However, the attacker still must trick the application into running the
malicious code. Thus, the second part of the exploit typically involves memory corruption techniques
that allow the attacker’s code to be inserted into the execution flow of the vulnerable software. After
that happens, a legitimate application, such as a document viewer or web browser, will perform actions
on behalf of the attacker, such as establishing communication and providing the ability to upload
additional malware to the target endpoint. Because the application being exploited is a legitimate
application, traditional signature-based antivirus and allow-list software has virtually no effectiveness
against these attacks.
Although there are many thousands of exploits, they all rely on a small set of core techniques that
change infrequently. For example, a heap spray is an attempt to insert the attacker’s code into multiple
locations within the memory heap in the hope that one of those locations will be called by the process
and executed. Three to five core techniques typically must be used to exploit an application.
Key Idea
● Regardless of the attack or its complexity, for the attack to be successful the attacker
must execute a series of these core exploit techniques in sequence, like navigating a
maze to reach its objective.
BEC (business email compromise) is a form of e-mail email scam where the attacker directs the
organization to defraud. Business email marketing is a major and growing issue affecting businesses of
all sizes and industries around the world. Organizations have been exposed to billions of dollars in
potential losses as a result of BEC programs.
CEO fraud: In this type of fraud, the attacker pretends to be the CEO of a company or an official and
then sends an email to someone in the finance department requesting that the money be transferred
to an account controlled by the attacker.
Compromise Account: The hacker gains access to the employee's email account, which is then used to
claim payments from merchants. Payments are then sent to the attacker's phony accounts.
False Invoice System: This is a common strategy used by attackers to target overseas providers. The
scam disguises itself as a provider and demands that funds be transferred to fake accounts.
Data Theft: These attacks often target HR employees in an attempt to obtain personal or sensitive
information about company executives, such as CEOs and CFOs. This information can be used in
subsequent attacks, such as CEO fraud.
1.12.3 Identify the chain of events that result from social engineering
The basic requirement for social engineering to work is to ensure that the user does not realize that
something is wrong. Typically, a successful social engineering attack is accomplished either through a
routine the user regularly goes through (for example, logging in to a Twitter account) or by arousing the
user’s emotions so that they override normal rational thought. For example, a hacker might call the
help desk, pretend to be a vice president of the company, and immediately demand their password or
the help desk representative will be fired. The following are examples of the chain of events that have
occurred in attacks initiated with social engineering.
1.12.4 References
Malicious network attacks have been on the rise in the last decade. One of the most damaging attacks,
often executed over DNS, is accomplished through command and control, also called C2 or C&C.
The attacker starts by infecting a computer, which may sit behind a firewall. This can be done in a
variety of ways:
● Via a phishing email that tricks the user into following a link to a malicious website or opening
an attachment that executes malicious code.
● Through security holes in browser plugins.
● Via other infected software.
Once communication is established, the infected machine sends a signal to the attacker’s server
looking for its next instruction. The infected computer will carry out the commands from the attacker’s
C2 server and may install additional software, at which point the attacker will complete control of the
victim’s computer and can execute any code. The malicious code will typically spread to more
computers, creating a botnet – a network of infected machines. In this way, an attacker who is not
authorized to access a company’s network can obtain full control of that network.
● Data theft. Sensitive company data, such as financial documents, can be copied or transferred
to an attacker’s server.
● Shutdown. An attacker can shut down one or several machines, or even bring down a
company’s network.
● Reboot. Infected computers may suddenly and repeatedly shutdown and reboot, which can
disrupt normal business operations.
1.13.1 References
Attackers use a variety of techniques and attack types to achieve their objectives. Malware and
exploits are integral to the modern cyberattack strategy. Spamming and phishing are commonly
employed techniques to deliver malware and exploits to an endpoint via an email executable or a
web link to a malicious website. After an endpoint is compromised, an attacker typically installs
back doors, remote access trojans, and other malware to ensure persistence. An attacker often uses
compromised endpoints (“bots”) to perpetrate much larger-scale attacks against other organizations or
networks as part of a botnet.
Key Terms
● Bots (or zombies) are individual endpoints infected with advanced malware
that enables an attacker to take control of the compromised endpoint.
● A botnet is a network of bots (often tens of thousands or more) working
together under the control of attackers using numerous servers.
Bots and botnets are notoriously difficult for organizations to detect and defend against using
traditional anti-malware solutions.
1.14.1 Describe the type of IoT devices that are part of a botnet attack
In a botnet, advanced malware works together toward a common objective, with each bot increasing
the power and destructiveness of the overall botnet. The botnet can evolve to pursue new goals or
adapt as different security countermeasures are deployed. Communication between the individual bots
and the larger botnet through C2 servers provides resiliency in the botnet.
The flexibility and ability of botnets to evade defenses presents a significant threat to organizations. The
ultimate impact of a botnet is largely left up to the attacker, from sending spam one day to stealing
credit card data the next and far beyond, because many cyberattacks go undetected for months or
even years.
The key to “taking down” or “decapitating” a botnet is to separate the bots (infected endpoints) from
their brains (C2 servers). If the bots cannot get to their servers, they cannot get new instructions, upload
stolen data, or do any of the things that make botnets so unique and dangerous.
Although this approach may seem straightforward, extensive resources typically are required to map
the distributed C2 infrastructure of a botnet, and this approach almost always requires an enormous
amount of investigation, expertise, and coordination between numerous industry, security, and law
enforcement organizations worldwide.
Disabling of C2 servers often requires both physically seizing the servers and taking ownership of the
domain and/or IP address range associated with the servers. Technical teams, legal teams, and law
enforcement must coordinate closely to disable the C2 infrastructure of a botnet. Many botnets have C2
servers all over the world and will specifically function in countries that have little or no law
enforcement for internet crimes.
Further complicating takedown efforts is the fact that a botnet almost never relies on a single C2 server
but rather uses multiple C2 servers for redundancy purposes. Each server also typically is insulated by a
variety of intermediaries to hide the true location of the server. These intermediaries include P2P
networks, blogs, and social networking sites, and even communications that proxy through other
infected bots. These evasion techniques make even finding C2 servers a considerable challenge.
According to a 2019 botnet threat report, Spamhaus Malware Labs identified and issued Spamhaus
Block List (SBL) listings for 17,602 botnet C2 servers on 1,210 different networks.
Key Terms
Botnet C2 servers are used to control infected endpoints (bots) and to exfiltrate personal and/or
valuable data from bots. Botnets can be easily scaled up to send massive volumes of spam, spread
ransomware, launch distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, commit click-fraud campaigns, and/or
mine cryptocurrency (such as Bitcoin).
Spamming botnets
The largest botnets often are dedicated to sending spam. The premise is straightforward: The attacker
attempts to infect as many endpoints as possible, and the endpoints then can be used to send out
spam email messages without the end users’ knowledge. The relative impact of this type of bot on an
organization may seem low initially, but an infected endpoint sending spam could consume additional
bandwidth and ultimately reduce the productivity of the users and even the network itself. Perhaps
more consequential is the fact that the organization’s email domain and IP addresses also could easily
become listed by various real-time blackhole lists (RBLs), thus causing legitimate emails to be labeled
as spam and blocked by other organizations, and damaging the reputation of the organization.
Key Idea
● The Rustock botnet could send up to 25,000 spam email messages per hour
from an individual bot and, at its peak, sent an average of 192 spam emails per
minute per bot.
Rustock is estimated to have infected more than 2.4 million computers worldwide. In March 2011, the
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), working with Microsoft and others, took down the Rustock
botnet, which had operated for more than five years and at the time was responsible for sending up to
60 percent of the world’s spam.
A DDoS attack is a type of cyberattack in which extremely high volumes of network traffic such as
packets, data, or transactions are sent to the target victim’s network to make their network and systems
(such as an e-commerce website or other web application) unavailable or unusable. A DDoS botnet
uses bots as part of a DDoS attack, overwhelming a target server or network with traffic from a large
number of bots. In such attacks, the bots themselves are not the target of the attack. Instead, the bots
are used to flood some other remote target with traffic. The attacker leverages the massive scale of the
botnet to generate traffic that overwhelms the network and server resources of the target.
Unlike other types of cyberattacks, a DDoS attack does not typically employ a prolonged, stealthy
approach. Instead, a DDoS attack usually is a highly visible brute-force attack that is intended to rapidly
cause damage to the victim’s network and systems infrastructure and to its business and reputation.
DDoS attacks often target specific organizations for personal or political reasons, or to extort a ransom
payment in exchange for stopping the DDoS attack. DDoS attacks often are used by hacktivists to
promote or protest a particular political agenda or social cause. DDoS attacks also may be used for
criminal extortion purposes to extract a ransom payment in exchange for ending the attack.
DDoS botnets represent a dual risk for organizations: The organization itself can be the target of a DDoS
attack. And even if the organization isn’t the ultimate target, any infected endpoints participating in the
attack will consume valuable network resources and facilitate a criminal act, albeit unwittingly.
A DDoS attack also can be used as part of a targeted strategy for a later attack. While the victim
organization is busy defending against the DDoS attack and restoring the network and systems, the
attacker can deliver an exploit to the victim network (for example, by causing a buffer overflow in an
SQL database) that will enable a malware infection and establish a foothold in the network. The
attacker then can return later to expand the (stealthy) attack and extract stolen data.
Examples of recent DDoS attacks include attacks against World of Warcraft Classic and Wikipedia in
September 2019.
Financial botnets
Financial botnets, such as ZeuS and SpyEye, are responsible for the direct theft of funds from all types of
enterprises. These types of botnets typically are not as large as spamming or DDoS botnets, which grow
as large as possible for a single attacker. Instead, financial botnets often are sold as kits that allow
attackers to license the code and build their own botnets. The impact of a financial breach can be
enormous, including the breach of sensitive consumer and financial information, thus leading to
significant financial, legal, and brand damage.
As reported by Tech Republic: “A Mirai botnet variant was used in attacks against at least one financial
sector company in January 2018 – possibly the first time an IoT botnet has been observed in use in a
DDoS attack since the Mirai botnet took down multiple websites in 2017, according to a Thursday
report from Recorded Future.”
● “Spamhaus Botnet Threat Report 2019.” Spamhaus Malware Labs. January 2020,
https://www.spamhaus.org/news/article/793/spamhaus-botnet-threat-report-2019
● Oleg Kuprev, Ekaterina Badovskaya, and Alexander Gutnikov. “DDoS attacks in Q3 2019.”
Kaspersky. November 11, 2019, https://securelist.com/ddos-report-q3- 2019/94958/
● Rayome, Alison DeNisco. “Mirai variant botnet launches IoT DDoS attacks on financial sector.”
Tech Republic. April 5, 2018,
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/miraivariant-botnet-launches-iot-ddos-attacks-on-financial
-sector/
Victims of DoS attacks often target web servers of high-profile organizations such as banking,
commerce, and media companies, or government and trade organizations. Though DoS attacks do not
typically result in the theft or loss of significant information or other assets, they can cost the victim a
great deal of time and money to handle.
There are two general methods of DoS attacks: flooding services or crashing services. Flood attacks
occur when the system receives too much traffic for the server to buffer, causing them to slow down
and eventually stop. Popular flood attacks include:
Buffer overflow attacks – the most common DoS attack. The concept is to send more traffic to a
network address than the programmers have built the system to handle. It includes the attacks listed
below, in addition to others that are designed to exploit bugs specific to certain applications or
networks
ICMP flood – leverages misconfigured network devices by sending spoofed packets that ping every
computer on the targeted network, instead of just one specific machine. The network is then triggered
to amplify the traffic. This attack is also known as the smurf attack or ping of death.
SYN flood – sends a request to connect to a server, but never completes the handshake. Continues until
all open ports are saturated with requests and none are available for legitimate users to connect to.
Other DoS attacks simply exploit vulnerabilities that cause the target system or service to crash. In these
attacks, input is sent that takes advantage of bugs in the target that subsequently crash or severely
destabilize the system so that it can’t be accessed or used.
● The attacker can leverage the greater volume of machines to execute a seriously disruptive
attack.
● The location of the attack is difficult to detect due to the random distribution of attacking
systems (often worldwide).
● It is more difficult to shut down multiple machines than one.
● The true attacking party is very difficult to identify, as they are disguised behind many (mostly
compromised) systems.
Modern security technologies have developed mechanisms to defend against most forms of DoS
attacks, but due to the unique characteristics of DDoS, it is still regarded as an elevated threat and is of
higher concern to organizations that fear being targeted by such an attack.
DDoS
A Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack is a variant of a DoS attack that employs very large
numbers of attacking computers to overwhelm the target with bogus traffic. To achieve the necessary
scale, DDoS attacks are often performed by botnets, which can co-opt millions of infected machines to
unwittingly participate in the attack, even though they are not the target of the attack itself. Instead,
the attacker leverages the massive number of infected machines to flood the remote target with traffic
and cause a DoS.
Though the DDoS attack is a type of DoS attack, it is significantly more popular in its use due to the
features that differentiate and strengthen it from other types of DoS attacks.
● The attacking party can execute an attack of disruptive scale as a result of the large network of
infected computers—effectively a “zombie army”—under their command.
● The (often worldwide) distribution of attacking systems makes it very difficult to detect where
the actual attacking party is located.
● It is difficult for the target server to recognize the traffic as illegitimate and reject it on entry
because of the seemingly random distribution of attacking systems.
● DDoS attacks are much more difficult to shut down than other DoS attacks due to the number
of machines that must be shut down, as opposed to shutting down just one machine.
DDoS attacks often target specific organizations (enterprise or public) for personal or political reasons,
or to extort payment from the target in return for stopping the DDoS attack. The damages of a DDoS
attack are typically in time and money lost from the resulting downtime and lost productivity.
Examples of DDoS attacks are abundant. In January 2012, hacktivist cybergroup Anonymous conducted
an attack on multiple major supporters of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). In dissent of SOPA,
Anonymous executed DDoS attacks that disabled the websites of the US Justice Department, the
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the White House, the Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA), the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), Universal Music Group, and Broadcast
Music, Inc (BMI). To facilitate the attack, Anonymous built its botnet using an unconventional model
that allowed users wishing to support the organization to offer their computers as a bot for the attacks.
The DDoS attack is also leveraged as a weapon of cyber warfare. For example, in 2008 during the South
Ossetia war, Georgian government websites were crippled by what is believed to have been Russian
criminal gangs under the auspices of the Russian security services. The attack was made just prior to
Russia’s initial attacks on Georgian soil.
There are a number of DDoS mitigation techniques that organizations can implement to minimize the
possibility of an attack. Network security infrastructure should include DDoS detection tools that can
identify and block both exploits and tools that attackers use to launch an attack. Additionally, network
administrators can create profiles to observe and control specific floods of traffic (i.e. SYN floods, UDP,
and ICMP floods). Through looking at all traffic in aggregate, thresholds can be set to monitor and cut
behaviors that indicate a possible DDoS attack.
1.15.2 References
Advanced persistent threats (APTs) are a class of threats that are far more deliberate and potentially
devastating than other types of cyberattacks. As its name implies, an APT has three defining
characteristics. An APT is:
● Advanced: Attackers use advanced malware and exploits and typically also have the skills and
resources necessary to develop additional cyberattack tools and techniques, and may have
access to sophisticated electronic surveillance equipment, satellite imagery, and even human
intelligence assets.
● Persistent: An APT may take place over a period of several years. The attackers pursue specific
objectives and use a “low-and-slow” approach to avoid detection. The attackers are well
organized and typically have access to substantial financial backing, such as from a nation-state
or organized criminal organization, to fund their activities.
● Threat: An APT is deliberate and focused, rather than opportunistic. APTs are designed to cause
real damage, including significant financial loss, destruction of systems and infrastructure, and
physical harm and loss of life.
● Lazarus (also known as APT38, Gods Apostles, Gods Disciples, Guardians of Peace, ZINC, Whois
Team, and Hidden Cobra). The Lazarus APT group is a threat actor linked to North Korea and
believed to be behind attacks against more than 16 organizations in at least 11 countries,
including the Bangladesh cyber heist (US$81 million was surreptitiously transferred from the
New York Federal Reserve Bank account of Bangladesh in February 2016), the Troy Operation
(attacks against South Korean infrastructure in 2013), the DarkSeoul Operation (malware-based
1.16.1 References
● “Top 25 Threat Actors – 2019 Edition.” SBS CyberSecurity. December 12, 2019,
https://sbscyber.com/resources/top-25-threat-actors-2019-edition
● Paganini, Pierluigi. “US blames North Korea for the $81 million Bangladesh cyber heist.” Security
Affairs. March 24, 2017,
http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/57396/cyber-crime/bangladesh-cyber-heist.html
● Paganini, Pierluigi. “Hackers hit South Korea also spread spyware to steal military secrets.”
Security Affairs. July 9, 2013,
http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/16014/hacking/hackers-hit-south-korea-spyware-steal-military
-secrets.html
● Weisman, Aly. “A Timeline of the Crazy Events in the Sony Hacking Scandal.” Business Insider.
December 9, 2014, http://www.businessinsider.com/sony-cyber-hack-timeline-2014-12
● “Top 25 Threat Actors – 2019 Edition.” SBS CyberSecurity. December 12, 2019,
https://sbscyber.com/resources/top-25-threat-actors-2019-edition
● “Advanced Persistent Threat Groups.” FireEye. 2020,
https://www.fireeye.com/current-threats/apt-groups.html
● “Top 25 Threat Actors – 2019 Edition.” SBS CyberSecurity. December 12, 2019,
https://sbscyber.com/resources/top-25-threat-actors-2019-edition
● Settle, Andy, Nicholas Griffin, and Abel Toro. “Monsoon – Analysis of an APT Campaign: Espionage
and Data Loss Under the Cover of Current Affairs.” Forcepoint Security Labs. 2016,
https://www.forcepoint.com/sites/default/files/resources/files/forcepoint-security-labs-monsoon-a
nalysis-report.pdf
With the explosive growth in the number of mobile devices over the past decade, wireless (Wi-Fi)
networks now are everywhere. Of course, as a security professional, your first concern when trying to
get connected is, “How secure is this Wi-Fi network?” But for the average user, the unfortunate reality is
that Wi-Fi connectivity is more about convenience than security.
Thus, the challenge is not only to secure your Wi-Fi networks but also to protect the mobile devices that
your organization’s employees use to perform work and access potentially sensitive data, regardless of
where they are or whose network they’re on.Wi-Fi security begins and ends with authentication. If you
can’t control who has access to your wireless network, then you can’t protect your network.
Evil Twin
Perhaps the easiest way for an attacker to find a victim to exploit is to set up a wireless access point that
serves as a bridge to a real network. An attacker can inevitably bait a few victims with “free Wi-Fi
access.”
The main problem with this approach is that it requires a potential victim to stumble on the access
point and connect. The attacker can’t easily target a specific victim, because the attack depends on the
victim initiating the connection.
A slight variation on this approach is to use a more specific name that mimics a real access point
normally found at a particular location, the Evil Twin. For example, if your local airport provides Wi-Fi
service and calls it “Airport Wi-Fi,” the attacker might create an access point with the same name using
an access point that has two radios. Average users cannot easily discern when they are connected to
the real access point or a fake one, so this approach would catch a greater number of users than a
method that tries to attract victims at random. Still, the user must select the network, so a bit of chance
is involved in trying to reach a particular target.
The main limitation of the Evil Twin attack is that the attacker can’t choose the victim. In a crowded
location, the attacker will be able to get many people connecting to the wireless network to
unknowingly expose their account names and passwords. However, it’s not an effective approach if the
goal is to target employees in a specific organization.
If you want to understand a more targeted approach than the Evil Twin attack, think about what
happens when you bring your wireless device back to a location that you’ve previously visited. For
example, when you bring your laptop home, you don’t have to choose which access point to use,
because your device remembers the details of wireless networks to which it has previously connected.
The same practice applies when you visit the office or your favorite coffee shop.
Your mobile device detects when it’s in proximity to a previously known wireless network by sending a
beacon out to discover if a preferred network is within range. Under normal conditions, when a wireless
device sends out a beacon, the non-matching access points ignore it. The beacon goes unanswered,
except when it comes within the proximity of the preferred network.
The Jasager attack takes a more active approach toward beacon requests. Jasager (German for “the
yes-man”) responds to all beacon requests, thus taking a very permissive approach toward who can
connect. The user doesn’t have to manually choose the attacker’s access point. Instead, the attacker
pretends to be whichever access point the user normally connects to. Instead of trying to get victims to
connect at random, now the attacker simply needs to be within proximity of the target.
This process intercepts the communication from laptops, mobile phones, and tablets. Many, if not most,
3G/4G/LTE mobile devices automatically switch to Wi-Fi when they recognize that they are near a
network that they know.
An attacker can use the same method to capture WPA2 handshake packets to disconnect users from a
Wi-Fi network by using forged deauthentication packets. Users that reconnect unwittingly will connect
to the modified access point. Unlike the Evil Twin attack, the attacker doesn’t have to just wait for a
victim to connect to the modified access point; with this approach, everyone in the vicinity will
automatically connect and become a potential victim.
Jasager runs on any number of devices, but perhaps one of the most effective ways to employ it is with
the Pineapple access point. The Pineapple is simply an access point with modified firmware that
embeds several tools for wireless “penetration” testing. It also has several accessories such as support for
cellular USB cards to provide network connectivity when it is otherwise unavailable at the target
After the victim connects to a malicious access point, the man-in-the-middle attack can proceed, and
the attacker not only can observe and capture network traffic, but also modify it.
SSLstrip
After a user connects to a compromised Wi-Fi network or to an attacker’s Wi-Fi network masquerading
as a legitimate network, the attacker can control the content that the victim sees. The attacker simply
intercepts the victim’s web traffic, redirects the victim’s browser to a web server that it controls, and
serves whatever content the attacker desires.
A man-in-the middle attack can be used to steal a victim’s online banking or corporate email account
credentials. Normally, this type of traffic would be considered safe because the webpage typically uses
Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption. However, while the average user thinks a padlock icon appearing
somewhere in their browser’s address bar means that their browser is secure, that is not correct.
Additionally, the padlock appears differently, and in different locations, in different browsers. How does
the padlock appear in Internet Explorer? What about Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, and Apple Safari?
And it appears differently on different smartphones and tablets, too. It’s no wonder that typical end
users and even many security professionals can be easily tricked.
SSLstrip strips SSL encryption from a “secure” session. When a user connecting to a compromised Wi-Fi
network attempts to initiate an SSL session, the modified access point intercepts the SSL request (see
Figure 1-6). The modified access point then completes the SSL session on behalf of the victim’s device.
Then the SSL tunnel between the victim’s device and the legitimate secure web server is terminated
and decrypted on the modified access point, thus allowing the attacker to see the victim’s credentials
and other sensitive information in cleartext.
Key Terms
● A favicon (“favorite icon”) is a small file containing one or more small icons
associated with a particular website or webpage.
Emotet
Emotet is a trojan, first identified in 2014, that has long been used in spam botnets and ransomware
attacks. Emotet variants use Wi-Fi spreader modules to scan Wi-Fi networks and look for vulnerable
devices to infect. The Wi-Fi spreader module scans nearby Wi-Fi networks on an infected device and
then attempts to connect to vulnerable Wi-Fi networks via a brute-force attack. After Emotet
successfully connects to a Wi-Fi network, it scans for non-hidden shares and attempts another
brute-force attack to guess usernames and passwords on other devices connected to the network. It
then installs its malware payload and establishes C2 communications on newly infected devices.
WPA was published as an interim standard in 2003, quickly followed by WPA2 in 2004. WPA/WPA2
contains improvements to protect against the inherent flaws in WEP. These improvements include
changes to the encryption to avoid many of the problems that plagued WEP.
WPA2 can be implemented in different ways. WPA2-Enterprise, also known as WPA2-802.1x mode, uses
the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) and Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS)
for authentication. Numerous EAP types also are available for use in WPA2-Enterprise.
However, a pre-shared key (PSK) by far is the most common use, particularly in homes, small
businesses, and guest Wi-Fi networks. WPA2-PSK can be implemented with just the AP and the client;
neither a third-party 802.1x authentication server nor individual user accounts are required.
Key Terms
In WPA2, the name of the SSID is used for the salt. An easy way to make your Wi-Fi security stronger
(and make rainbow table attacks impractical) is to change your SSID to something that isn’t common or
easily guessed.
To execute an attack on a WPA2 passphrase, an attacker needs to be able to test a large number of
passphrase candidates. So, although WPA2 remains cryptographically secure (the key isn’t recoverable
by simple observation of the traffic, as with WEP), methods do exist to test passphrases offline by
gathering the handshake packets between the AP and a legitimate user.
To collect the necessary packets to crack a WPA2 passphrase, an attacker could passively gather traffic
when a legitimate user joins the network. This method requires time, however, because the attacker
does not know when someone will join the network.
For an impatient attacker, the solution is to employ an active attack. If a legitimate user is already
online, the attacker can force the user’s client device to disconnect from the AP with forged
deauthentication packets. After the client device is disconnected, it will automatically attempt to
reconnect, thus providing the attacker with the handshake packets needed for offline passphrase
analysis. Therefore, unlike with WEP, attacks on WPA2 do not require attackers to spend a significant
amount of time in the proximity of the target network after the handshake packets have been
captured.
Key Terms
Next, the attacker must recover (or find) the passphrase itself, which requires the following:
● A test to check millions of potential passphrases until it finds the correct passphrase. To
avoid detection, an attacker can’t use the actual target, because the victim could see this attack
activity. The alternative is to use an offline method of testing that uses the handshake packets.
● A methodology to guess passphrases. The worst-case scenario is to “brute force” the
passphrase, trying every possible combination of numbers and characters until a correct value is
found. This effort can produce a correct result given enough time and computing power.
However, a much faster method is to take educated guesses without having to resort to brute
force. An attacker that uses educated guesses on possible passphrase candidates can attempt a
much shorter list.
WPA3 was published in 2018 and introduces security enhancements such as more robust brute-force
attack protection, improved hot spot and guest access security, simpler integration with devices that
have limited or no user interface (such as IoT devices), and a 192-bit security suite. Newer Wi-Fi routers
and client devices likely will support both WPA2 and WPA3 to ensure backward compatibility in mixed
environments.
According to the Wi-Fi Alliance, WPA3 features include improved security for IoT devices such as smart
bulbs, wireless appliances, smart speakers, and other screen-free gadgets that make everyday tasks
easier. The Wi-Fi Alliance is expected to support a one-touch setup system that will make devices
without screens (such as IoT devices and smart speakers such as Google Home and Amazon Echo)
easier to connect. It will be similar to the existing Wi-Fi Protected Setup protocol, which involves
pushing a button on the router to connect a device.
According to a recent VentureBeat article, WPA3 also “supports a much stronger encryption algorithm
than WPA2 … intended for industrial, defense, and government applications rather than homes and
offices. Specifically, it includes a 192-bit security suite that’s aligned with the Commercial National
Security Algorithm (CNSA) Suite, a feature requested by the Committee on National Security Systems
(CNSS), a part of the U.S. National Security Agency [NSA].”
WPA3 provides protection against brute-force dictionary attacks by implementing “a robust handshake
[called the Dragonfly protocol, also referred to as Simultaneous Authentication of Equals] that isn’t
vulnerable to wireless exploits like KRACK, and it hardens security at the time when the network key is
exchanged between a device and the access point.” WPA3 also reduces the efficacy of common
dictionary attacks by limiting the number of network password attempts on a per-user basis.
An attacker can trick victims into connecting to a wireless network that the attacker controls instead of
breaking into a wireless network. These techniques are part of a larger set of attacks known as
man-in-the-middle attacks. With a man-in-the-middle exploit in place on a Wi-Fi network, an attacker
can produce or display practically any content, for example:
● If a user attempts to download a legitimate file, the attacker can send mobile malware instead.
● When a user attempts to visit a legitimate webpage, the attacker can alter the content to exploit
a vulnerability that exists in the device’s browser, thus allowing the attacker to further escalate
an attack.
● Email addresses and financial account information can be harvested from the connected
endpoint, thus enabling an attacker to create a very targeted and convincing phishing attack to
trick even more users on a network into disclosing sensitive information.
● Wiggers, Kyle. “What is WPA3, why does it matter, and when can you expect it?” VentureBeat.
May 19, 2018,
https://venturebeat.com/2018/05/19/what-is-wpa3-why-does-it-matter-and-when-can-you-expec
t-it/
● Quinn, James. “Emotet Evolves With New Wi-Fi Spreader.” Binary Defense. February 7, 2020,
https://www.binarydefense.com/emotet-evolves-with-new-wi-fi-spreader/
● Quinn, James. “Emotet Evolves With New Wi-Fi Spreader.” Binary Defense. February 7, 2020,
https://www.binarydefense.com/emotet-evolves-with-new-wi-fi-spreader/
The primary value of the mainframe computer was its processing power. The relatively limited data that
was produced was typically stored on near-line media, such as tape. Today, data is the target. Data is
stored online in data centers and in the cloud, and it is a high-value target for any attacker. The primary
issue with a perimeter-based network security strategy in which countermeasures are deployed at a
handful of well-defined ingress and egress points to the network is that the strategy relies on the
assumption that everything on the internal network can be trusted. However, this assumption no
longer is safe to make, given modern business conditions and computing environments where:
● Remote employees, mobile users, and cloud computing solutions blur the distinction between
“internal” and “external.”
● Wireless technologies, the proliferation of partner connections, and the need to support guest
users introduce countless additional pathways into the network branch offices that may be
located in untrusted countries or regions.
● Insiders, whether intentionally malicious or just careless, may present a very real security threat.
A broken trust model is not the only issue with perimeter-centric approaches to network security.
Another contributing factor is that traditional security devices and technologies (such as port based
firewalls) commonly used to build network perimeters allow too much unwanted traffic through. Typical
shortcomings in this regard include the inability to:
● Definitively distinguish good applications from bad ones, which leads to overly permissive access
control settings
● Adequately account for encrypted application traffic
● Accurately identify and control users (regardless of where they’re located or which devices
they’re using)
● Filter allowed traffic not only for known application-borne threats but also for unknown ones
The net result is that re-architecting defenses in a way that creates pervasive internal trust boundaries
is, by itself, insufficient. You also must ensure that the devices and technologies used to implement
these boundaries actually provide the visibility, control, and threat inspection capabilities needed to
securely enable essential business applications while still thwarting modern malware, targeted attacks,
and the unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive data.
The DMZ network is a perimeter network that protects and adds an extra layer of security to the
organization's internal network from unreliable traffic. A typical DMZ is a sub-network that resides
between a public network and a private network.
DMZ's ultimate goal is to allow the organization to access unreliable networks, such as the Internet,
while ensuring that its private or LAN network remains secure. Organizations often store external
services and resources, including Domain Name Program (DNS) servers, File Transfer Protocol (FTP),
email, proxy, Voice over Internet (VoIP) Protocol, and web servers, on DMZ.
These servers and resources are segregated and are given limited access to the LAN to ensure they can
be accessed over the Internet but the internal LAN cannot. As a result, the DMZ method makes it very
difficult for a hacker to gain direct access to organizational data and internal servers via the Internet.
A firewall is a hardware and/or software platform that controls the flow of traffic between a trusted
network (such as a corporate LAN) and an untrusted network (such as the internet).
Application firewalls
Third-generation application (also known as Application layer gateways, proxy-based, and reverse-proxy)
firewalls have the following characteristics:
● They operate up to Layer 7 (Application layer) of the OSI model and control access to specific
applications and services on the network.
● They proxy network traffic rather than permit direct communication between hosts. Requests
are sent from the originating host to a proxy server, which analyzes the contents of the data
packets and, if permitted, sends a copy of the original data packets to the destination host.
They inspect Application layer traffic and thus can identify and block specified content, malware,
exploits, websites, and applications or services that use hiding techniques such as encryption and
non-standard ports.
Key Idea
● Proxy servers also can be used to implement strong user authentication and
web application filtering and to mask the internal network from untrusted
networks. However, proxy servers have a significant negative impact on the
overall performance of the network.
East-west refers to data packets moving between virtual workloads entirely within the private cloud.
East-west traffic is protected by a local, virtualized firewall instantiated on each hypervisor. East-west
firewalls are inserted transparently into the application infrastructure and do not necessitate a redesign
of the logical topology.
Perimeter security makes up a significant part of most organizations’ network security controls.
Network security devices such as network firewalls inspect “north-south” (client to server) traffic that
crosses the security perimeter and stop bad traffic. Assets within the perimeter are implicitly trusted,
thus “east-west” (workload to workload) traffic may go without inspection.
For most organizations, east-west communications make up the majority of data center and cloud
traffic patterns, and perimeter-focused defenses do not have visibility into east-west traffic. Given these
factors, malicious actors use this as an opportunity to move laterally across workloads.
● Firewall, https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/firewall
● What is Microsegmentation?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-microsegmentation
The Zero Trust security model was introduced by Forrester Research. It addresses some of the
limitations of perimeter-based network security strategies by removing the assumption of trust. With
Zero Trust, essential security capabilities are deployed in a way that provides policy enforcement and
protection for all users, devices, applications, and data resources, and the communications traffic
between them, regardless of location.
In particular, with Zero Trust there is no default trust for any entity – including users, devices,
applications, and packets – regardless of what it is and its location on or relative to the enterprise
network. Verification that authorized entities are always doing only what they’re allowed to do becomes
mandatory in a Zero Trust model.
● The need to establish trust boundaries that effectively compartmentalize the various segments
of the internal computing environment. The general idea is to move security functionality closer
to the pockets of resources that require protection. In this way, security can always be enforced
regardless of the point of origin of associated communications traffic.
● The need for trust boundaries to do more than just initial authorization and access control
enforcement. To “always verify” also requires ongoing monitoring and inspection of associated
communications traffic for subversive activities (such as threats).
● Clearly improved effectiveness in mitigating data loss with visibility and safe enablement of
applications, and detection and prevention of cyberthreats
● Greater efficiency for achieving and maintaining compliance with security and privacy
mandates, using trust boundaries to segment sensitive applications, systems, and data
● Improved ability to securely enable transformative IT initiatives, such as user mobility, bring your
own device (BYOD) and bring your own access (BYOA), infrastructure virtualization, and cloud
computing
● Lower total cost of ownership (TCO) with a consolidated and fully integrated product platform,
rather than a disparate array of siloed, purpose-built security point products
The only way to determine and enforce policy that ensures secure access to your data is to understand
who the users are, which applications they are using, and how they are connecting. With an
understanding of the interdependencies between the DAAS, infrastructure, services, and users, you
should put controls in place as close to the protect surface as possible, thus creating a micro-perimeter
around it. This micro-perimeter moves with the protect surface wherever it goes.
Key Terms
● The principle of least privilege in network security requires that only the
permission or access rights necessary to perform an authorized task are
granted.
● A protect surface consists of the most critical and valuable data, assets,
applications, and services (DAAS) on a network.
Remember that a trust zone is not intended to be a “pocket of trust” where systems (and therefore
threats) within the zone can communicate freely and directly with each other. For a full Zero Trust
implementation, the network would be configured to ensure that all communications traffic, including
traffic between devices in the same zone, is intermediated by the corresponding Zero Trust
Segmentation Platform.
1.21.5 References
1.22 Describe the integration of services for network, endpoint, and cloud
With network security, no single solution will protect against the variety of threats that organizations
face. For more comprehensive protection, a combination of hardware and software provides multiple
layers of security to defend the network against various threats. The time, cost and manpower required
to carefully select, implement and maintain these tools is a huge investment for any organization.
However, those within the network environment will not always be inside the perimeter, and the
network protection capabilities will not always apply to them. If endpoints are not protected with the
right security solution products, these individuals could bypass the perimeter security and introduce
outside threats into the environment. The wrong endpoint security product can undo all of the work
that has been done to secure the network.
Below are the five things your endpoint should do to prevent a negative impact on your network
security posture:
According to a 2016 Ponemon study, 39 percent of respondents agree that all attacks can be
blocked if the organization is engaged in the sharing of threat intelligence. Employing global
threat intelligence expands protection capabilities beyond the knowledge of one solution to the
shared intelligence of a global community. When other members of the community encounter
new attacks, that information is shared so all members can automatically detect known threats
and quickly identify unknown threats.
Both the network and the endpoint should participate in threat intelligence sharing,
continuously applying growing threat intelligence across the devices in their own environments.
They should also exchange intelligence with each other so that what is identified and prevented
on the endpoint can also be identified and prevented on the network.
Most traditional security products are designed to detect known threats before they enter an
organization. In many cases, by the time an unknown threat has been detected, critical assets
have already been compromised and detection is too little, too late. Additionally, while attackers
often reuse existing malware and exploit techniques, they will also modify existing attacks or
create entirely new ones to evade detection. This leaves a whole gamut of threats undetectable
by most security products.
● Be automated.
Attackers have automation, scalability and specialized tools at their disposal. In Ponemon's 2016
Economics of a Breach survey, 68 percent of respondents said automated hacking tools make it
easier for attackers to execute successful attacks. An entire economy and marketplace exists to
drive the proliferation of these tools at affordable prices.
To defend against increasingly sophisticated attacks, organizations employ point solutions that
are often complex and people-intensive, yet seemingly insufficient. To outpace attackers, an
organization must make successful attacks more challenging and less profitable. Respondents
in the aforementioned survey claim 60 percent of attacks can be deterred if an attack requires
an additional 40 hours to conduct. The only way to achieve this in a scalable and sustainable
fashion is with automated prevention.
Detection on either the network or endpoint is not scalable if a security analyst must be
dispatched to investigate alerts. Automation makes an organization a more difficult target by
delaying the success of an attack and thus the payout, and causing the attacker to move on to
their next potential victim.
Users are increasingly becoming more mobile, connecting to internal resources from points
around the globe that are outside the organizational network perimeter. There should be the
same level of protection on all endpoints, regardless of their connectivity: online or offline, on- or
● Provide full visibility into activity on the network, endpoint and cloud.
Modern attacks go through multiple steps to achieve their objectives. To successfully prevent an
attack, organizations must have full visibility of all users, devices and data across their network,
endpoint and the cloud. This visibility is necessary to understand the context of an attack,
enforce security policy across the network and endpoint, and correlate security events to
improve the organization’s security posture. When natively integrated threat intelligence is
combined with the automated prevention of known and unknown threats to deliver persistent
protection, regardless of connectivity or location, the synergistic effect can dramatically improve
an organization’s security posture. This will make the organization less appealing to
opportunistic attackers as well as minimize the likelihood of a successful targeted attack.
Choosing the wrong endpoint security solution can leave your endpoints vulnerable to threats
and impede, or undo, the significant work that has gone into securing the network. Your
endpoint security solution should secure all endpoints continuously, as well as bring additional
capabilities to other parts of the organization and bolster your overall network security posture
overall.
1.22.1 References
Cybercrime and the types of security threats continue to evolve, thus challenging organizations to stay
current as network boundaries and attack surfaces expand. Security breaches and intellectual property
loss can have a huge impact on organizations. Current approaches to security, which focus mainly on
detection and remediation, are inadequate to sufficiently address the rise in volume and sophistication
of attacks.
Cybercriminals leverage automation and big data analytics to execute massively scalable and
increasingly effective attacks against their targets. Cybercriminals are not the only threat: Employees
often may unknowingly violate corporate compliance and expose critical data in locations such as the
public cloud.
● Provide full visibility: For network administrators and security practitioners to understand the full
context of an attack, visibility of all users and devices is provided across the organization’s
network, endpoint, cloud, and SaaS applications.
● Reduce the attack surface: Best-of-breed technologies that are natively integrated provide a
prevention architecture that inherently reduces the attack surface. This type of architecture
allows organizations to exert positive control based on applications, users, and content, with
support for open communication, orchestration, and visibility.
● Prevent all known threats, fast: A coordinated security platform accounts for the full scope of an
attack across the various security controls that compose the security posture, thus enabling
organizations to quickly identify and block known threats.
● Detect and prevent new, unknown threats with automation: Security that simply detects threats
and requires a manual response is too little, too late. Automated creation and delivery of
near-real-time protections against new threats to the various security solutions in the
organization’s environments enable dynamic policy updates. These updates are designed to
allow enterprises to scale defenses with technology, rather than people.
Security should not be a barrier to the adoption of new mobility, SaaS, public, or private cloud
technologies that enable productivity. Organizations that have a natively integrated, prevention-first
security platform in place can securely adopt innovative, productivity-enhancing applications and
technologies, all while maintaining a comprehensive and consistent prevention oriented enterprise
security posture.
Application development and IT operations teams also are accelerating the delivery of new applications
to drive business growth by adopting DevOps tools and methodologies, cloud and container
technologies, big data analytics, and automation and orchestration. Meanwhile, applications are
increasingly accessible. The result is an incredibly complex network that introduces significant business
risk. Organizations must minimize this risk without slowing down the business. A different approach to
security, therefore, is needed. Defenders need to replace siloed point products with security innovations
that are tightly integrated. Security requires simplicity. The Palo Alto Networks product portfolio
consists of a tightly integrated system of components and services, including a partner ecosystem, that
delivers consistent security across the network, endpoints, and cloud. The product portfolio is a fully
integrated system that simplifies security by leveraging consolidated threat intelligence information,
automation, machine learning, and data analytics.
The product portfolio’s prevention architecture allows organizations to reduce threat exposure by first
enabling applications for all users or devices in any location and then preventing threats within
application flows, associating application use to user identities across physical, cloud based, and
software-as-a-service (SaaS) environments.
1.23.2 References
● The use of Web 2.0 apps in the enterprise is sometimes referred to as Enterprise 2.0, although
not all Web 2.0 apps are considered Enterprise 2.0 applications.
● For proof of detection in each category, MITRE requires that the proof be provided to them, but
they may not include all detection details in public results, particularly when those details are
sensitive.
● You can click each individual CVE to view in-depth details about it on a panel that appears on
the right.
● Effective change and configuration management processes help to ensure that newly deployed
applications and endpoints are properly configured (for example, disabling unneeded ports and
services) and maintained.
Routers are physical or virtual devices that send data packets to destination networks along a
network path using logical addresses (discussed under task 2.6). Routers use various routing
protocols to determine the best path to a destination, based on variables such as bandwidth, cost,
delay, and distance. A wireless router combines the functionality of a router and a wireless access
point (AP) to provide routing between a wired and wireless network. An AP is a network device that
connects to a router or wired network and transmits a Wi-Fi signal so that wireless devices can
connect to a wireless (or Wi-Fi) network. A wireless repeater rebroadcasts the wireless signal from a
wireless router or AP to extend the range of a Wi-Fi network.
A hub (or concentrator) is a network device that connects multiple devices such as desktop
computers, laptop docking stations, and printers on a LAN. Network traffic that is sent to a hub is
broadcast out of all ports on the hub, which can create network congestion and introduces potential
security risks (because broadcast data can be intercepted).
A switch is essentially an intelligent hub that uses physical addresses to forward data packets to
devices on a network. Unlike a hub, a switch is designed to forward data packets only to the port that
corresponds to the destination device. This transmission method (referred to as
micro-segmentation) creates separate network segments and effectively increases the data
transmission rates available on the individual network segments. Also, a switch can be used to
implement virtual LANs (VLANs), which logically segregate a network and limit broadcast domains
and collision domains.
Key Idea
● ARPANET was the first packet-switched network created by the U.S. Defense Advanced
Research Project Agency (DARPA).
Key Terms
● A router is a network device that sends data packets to a destination network along a network path.
● A wireless repeater rebroadcasts the wireless signal from a wireless router or AP to extend the range of
a Wi-Fi network.
● A hub (or concentrator) is a device used to connect multiple networked devices on a local-area network
(LAN).
● A switch is an intelligent hub that forwards data packets only to the port associated with the
destination device on a network.
● A virtual LAN (VLAN) is a logical network that is created within a physical LAN.
● A broadcast domain is the portion of a network that receives broadcast packets sent from a node in the
domain.
● A collision domain is a network segment on which data packets may collide with each other
during transmission.
● Border Routers that connect to the Internet and are the first hop for the IPs provided by the ISP
● Core Routers or Switches that handle routing between internal networks
● Distribution Routers or Switches that aggregate Access Switches. They will either pass traffic
between locally connected access switches or forward traffic to the core to be routed
● Access Switches that provide physical Ethernet connectivity for endpoints (clients and servers)
● Security Gateways that may include multiple layers of firewalls, Network IPS, Web Gateways,
and Email Gateways
2.1.2 References
● “Ericsson Mobility Report, November 2019.” Ericsson. November 2019,
https://www.ericsson.com/en/mobility-report.
● Networking,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2015/04/when-it-comes-to-networking-keep-it-simple/
A VLAN is a set of devices or network nodes that communicate with each other as if they were building
a single LAN, when in fact they are present in one or more LAN sections. Virtual local-area networks
(VLANs) segment broadcast domains in a LAN, typically into logical groups (such as business
departments). VLANs are created on network switches.
Routed protocols, such as Internet Protocol (IP), address packets with routing information that enables
those packets to be transported across networks using routing protocols.
Key Terms
Routing protocols are defined at the Network layer of the OSI model and specify how routers
communicate with one another on a network. Routing protocols can either be static or dynamic.
A static routing protocol requires that routes be created and updated manually on a router or other
network device. If a static route is down, traffic can’t be automatically rerouted unless an alternate
route has been configured. Also, if the route is congested, traffic can’t be automatically rerouted over
the less congested alternate route. Static routing is practical only in very small networks or for very
limited, special-case routing scenarios (for example, a destination that’s used as a backup route or is
reachable only via a single router). However, static routing has low bandwidth requirements (routing
information isn’t broadcast across the network) and some built-in security (users can route only to
destinations that are specified in statically defined routes).
A dynamic routing protocol can automatically learn new (or alternate) routes and determine the
best route to a destination. The routing table is updated periodically with current routing
information. Dynamic routing protocols are further classified as:
● Split horizon: Prevents a router from advertising a route back out through the same interface
from which the route was learned.
● Triggered updates: When a change is detected, the update is sent immediately instead of
after the 30-second time delay normally required to send a RIP update.
● Route poisoning: Sets the hop count on a bad route to 16, which effectively advertises the
route as unreachable.
● Holddown timers: Cause a router to start a timer when the router first receives information
that a destination is unreachable. Subsequent updates about that destination will not be
accepted until the timer expires. This timer also helps avoid problems associated with
flapping. Flapping occurs when a route (or interface) repeatedly changes state (up, down, up,
down) over a short period of time.
Link state: A link-state protocol requires every router to calculate and maintain a complete map, or
routing table, of the entire network. Routers that use a link-state protocol periodically transmit
updates that contain information about adjacent connections, or link states, to all other routers in
the network. Link-state protocols are compute-intensive, but they can calculate the most efficient
route to a destination. They consider numerous factors, such as link speed, delay, load, reliability, and
cost (an arbitrarily assigned weight or metric). Convergence occurs very rapidly (within seconds) with
link-state protocols.
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is an example of a link-state routing protocol that often is used in
large enterprise networks. OSPF routes network traffic within a single autonomous system (AS).
OSPF networks are divided into areas identified by 32-bit area identifiers. Area identifiers can (but
don’t need to) correspond to network IP addresses and can duplicate IP addresses without conflicts.
Path vector: A path-vector protocol is similar to a distance-vector protocol but without the
scalability issues associated with limited hop counts in distance-vector protocols. Each routing table
entry in a path-vector protocol contains path information that gets dynamically updated.
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is an example of a path-vector protocol used between separate
autonomous systems. BGP is the core protocol used by internet service providers (ISPs) and network
service providers (NSPs), and on very large private IP networks.
Key Idea
● Convergence is the time required for all routers in a network to update their
routing tables with the most current routing information about the network.
● Hop count generally refers to the number of router nodes that a packet
must pass through to reach its destination.
● An autonomous system (AS) is a group of contiguous IP address ranges
under the control of a single internet entity. Individual autonomous systems
are assigned a 16-bit or 32-bit AS number (ASN) that uniquely identifies the
network on the internet. ASNs are assigned by the Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority (IANA).
A broadcast domain is the portion of a network that receives broadcast packets sent from a node in
the domain.
A collision domain is a network segment on which data packets may collide with each other during
transmission.
2.6.1 WAN
A wide-area network (WAN) is a computer network that connects multiple LANs or other WANs
across a relatively large geographic area such as a small city, a region or country, or a global
enterprise network.
2.6.2 LAN
A local-area network (LAN) is a computer network that connects end-user devices such as laptop
and desktop computers, servers, printers, and other devices so that applications, databases, files, file
storage, and other networked resources can be shared among authorized users on the LAN. A LAN
operates across a relatively small geographic area (such as a floor, a building, or a group of buildings),
typically at speeds of up to 10Mbps (Ethernet), 100Mbps (Fast Ethernet), 1,000Mbps (or 1Gbps –
Gigabit Ethernet) on wired networks and 11Mbps (802.11b), 54Mbps (802.11a and g), 450Mbps (802.11n),
1.3Gbps (802.11ac), and 14Gbps (802.11ax – theoretical) on wireless networks. A LAN can be wired,
wireless, or a combination of wired and wireless. Examples of networking equipment commonly
used in LANs include bridges, hubs, repeaters, switches, and wireless access points (APs).
● Star: Each node on the network is directly connected to a switch, hub, or concentrator, and all
data communications must pass through the switch, hub, or concentrator. The switch, hub,
or concentrator thus can become a performance bottleneck or single point of failure in the
network. A star topology is ideal for practically any size environment and is the most
commonly used basic LAN topology.
● Mesh: All nodes are interconnected to provide multiple paths to all other resources. A mesh
topology may be used throughout the network or only for the most critical network
components, such as routers, switches, and servers, to eliminate performance bottlenecks
and single points of failure.
Key Idea
● Two basic network topologies which are commonly used in LANs are star and mesh.
Key Terms
● A local-area network (LAN) is a computer network that connects laptop and desktop
computers, servers, printers, and other devices so that applications, databases, files
and file storage, and other networked resources can be shared across a relatively
small geographic area, such as a floor, a building, or a group of buildings.
● A bridge is a wired or wireless network device that extends a network or joins
separate network segments.
● A repeater is a network device that boosts or retransmits a signal to physically extend
the range of a wired or wireless network.
● In a ring topology, all nodes are connected in a closed loop that forms a continuous
ring and all communication travels in a single direction around the ring. Ring
topologies were common in token ring networks.
● In a bus (or linear bus) topology, all nodes are connected to a single cable (the
backbone) that is terminated on both ends. In the past, bus networks were commonly
used for very small networks because they were inexpensive and relatively easy to
install.
Other once-popular network topologies, such as ring and bus, are rarely found in modern networks.
A software-defined wide-area network (SD-WAN) separates the control and management processes
from the underlying networking hardware, thus making them available as software that can be
easily configured and deployed. A centralized control console means network administrators can
write new rules and policies, and then configure and deploy them across an entire network at once.
SD-WAN makes management and direction of traffic across a network easier. With traditional
networking approaches such as MPLS, traffic created in the branch is returned, or “backhauled,” to a
centralized internet security point in a headquarters data center. Backhauling of traffic can lower
application performance, which results in reduced productivity and poor user experience. Because
MPLS networks are private networks built for one given organization, they are considered reliable
and secure, but they are expensive. Moreover, MPLS is not designed to handle the high volumes of
WAN traffic that result from software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications and cloud adoption.
● Simplicity: Because each device is centrally managed, with routing based on application
policies, WAN managers can create and update security rules in real time as network
requirements change. Also, when SD-WAN is combined with zero-touch provisioning, a
feature that helps automate the deployment and configuration processes, organizations can
further reduce the complexity, resources, and operating expenses required to spin up new
sites.
● Improved performance: By allowing efficient access to cloud-based resources without the
need to backhaul traffic to centralized locations, organizations can provide a better user
experience.
● Reduced costs: Network administrators can supplement or substitute expensive MPLS with
broadband and other connectivity options.
Key Terms
The Domain Name System (DNS) is a distributed, hierarchical internet database that maps fully
qualified domain names (FQDNs) for computers, services, and other resources such as a website
address (also known as a uniform resource locator, or URL) to IP addresses, similar to how a contact
list on a smartphone maps the names of businesses and individuals to phone numbers. If you want
to create a new domain name that will be accessible via the internet, you must register your unique
domain name with a domain name registrar, such as GoDaddy or Network Solutions. This
registration is similar to listing a new phone number in a phone directory. DNS is critical to the
operation of the internet.
Key Terms
● A fully qualified domain name (FQDN) is the complete domain name for a
specific computer, service, or resource connected to the internet or a private
network.
● A domain name registrar is an organization that is accredited by a top-level
domain (TLD) registry to manage domain name registrations.
● A top-level domain (TLD) is the highest-level domain in DNS, represented
by the last part of an FQDN (for example, .com and .edu). The most
commonly used TLDs are generic top-level domains (gTLDs) (such as .com,
edu, .net, and .org) and country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs) (such as .ca
and .us).
● An authoritative DNS server is the system of record for a given domain.
There are several components that are used to provide DNS and they have a hierarchy in terms of
authority.
A root name server is the authoritative name server for a DNS root zone. Worldwide, 13 root name
servers (actually, 13 networks comprising hundreds of root name servers) are configured. They are
named a.root-servers.net through m.root-servers.net. DNS servers typically are configured with a root
hints file that contains the names and IP addresses of the root servers.
A host (such as a web browser on a desktop computer) on a network that needs to connect to
another host (such as a web server on the internet) must first translate the name of the destination
host from its URL to an IP address. The connecting host (the DNS client) sends a DNS request to the
IP address of the DNS server that is specified in the network configuration of the DNS client. If the
DNS server is authoritative for the destination domain, the DNS server resolves the IP address of the
destination host and answers the DNS request from the DNS client. Imagine, for example, you are
attempting to connect to an intranet server on your internal network from the desktop computer in
your office. If the DNS server address that is configured on your computer is an internal DNS server
that is authoritative for your intranet domain, the DNS server resolves the IP address of the intranet
server. Your computer then encapsulates the resolved destination IP address in the Hypertext
Transfer Protocol (HTTP) or Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS) request packets that are sent
to the intranet server.
If a DNS server is not authoritative for the destination domain (for example, an internet website
address), then the DNS server performs a recursive query (if it is configured to perform recursive
queries) to obtain the IP address of the authoritative DNS server and then sends the original DNS
request to the authoritative DNS server. This process is a top-down procedure in which the DNS
server first consults its root hints file and queries a root name server to identify the authoritative DNS
server for the top-level domain (TLD; for example, .com) associated with the DNS query. The DNS
server then queries the TLD server to identify the authoritative server for the specific domain that is
being queried (for example, paloaltonetworks.com). This process continues until the authoritative
server for the FQDN is identified and queried. The recursive DNS server then answers the original
DNS client’s request with the DNS information from the authoritative DNS server.
DNS over HTTPS (DoH) is a more secure implementation of the DNS protocol that uses HTTPS to
encrypt data between the DNS client and the DNS resolver.
In 2019, there were nearly 27 billion active internet of things (IoT) devices worldwide, including
machine-to-machine (M2M), wide-area IoT, short-range IoT, massive-and-critical IoT, and multi-access edge
computing (MEC) devices (source: https://securitytoday.com/Articles/2020/01/13/The-IoT-Rundown-for-2020).
Key Terms
● Cellular:
○ 2G/2.5G: 2G connectivity remains a prevalent and viable IoT connectivity option due to
the low cost of 2G modules, relatively long battery life, and large installed base of 2G
sensors and M2M applications.
○ 3G: IoT devices with 3G modules use either Wideband Code Division Multiple Access
(W-CDMA) or Evolved High Speed Packet Access (HSPA+ and Advanced HSPA+) to
achieve data transfer rates of 384Kbps to 168Mbps.
○ 4G/Long-Term Evolution (LTE): 4G/LTE networks enable real-time IoT use cases, such as
autonomous vehicles, with 4G LTE Advanced Pro delivering speeds in excess of 3Gbps
and less than 2 milliseconds of latency.
○ 5G: 5G cellular technology provides significant enhancements compared to 4G/LTE
networks and is backed by ultra-low latency, massive connectivity and scalability for IoT
devices, more efficient use of the licensed spectrum, and network slicing for application
traffic prioritization.
● Satellite:
○ C-band: C-band satellite operates in the 4 to 8 gigahertz (GHz) range. It is used in some
Wi-Fi devices and cordless phones, and in surveillance and weather radar systems.
○ L-band: L-band satellite operates in the 1 to 2GHz range. It commonly is used for radar,
global positioning systems (GPSs), radio, and telecommunications applications.
● Short-range wireless:
○ Adaptive Network Technology + (ANT+): ANT+ is a proprietary multicast wireless sensor
network technology primarily used in personal wearables, such as sports and fitness
sensors.
○ Bluetooth/Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE): Bluetooth is a low-power, short-range
communications technology primarily designed for point-to-point communications
between wireless devices in a hub-and-spoke topology. BLE (also known as Bluetooth
Smart or Bluetooth 4.0+) devices consume significantly less power than Bluetooth
devices and can access the internet directly through 6LoWPAN connectivity.
Identity of Things (IDoT) refers to Identity and Access Management (IAM) solutions for the IoT. These
solutions must be able to manage human-to-device, device-to-device, and/or device-to-service/system
IAM by:
Though the IoT presents innovative new approaches and services in all industries, it also presents
new cybersecurity risks. According to research conducted by the Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 threat
intelligence team, the general security posture of IoT devices is declining, thus leaving organizations
vulnerable to new IoT-targeted malware and older attack techniques that IT teams have long
forgotten. Key findings include:
● IoT devices are unencrypted and unsecured: Ninety-eight percent of all IoT device traffic is
unencrypted, thus exposing personal and confidential data on the network. Attackers that
have successfully bypassed the first line of defense (most frequently via phishing attacks) and
established C2 can listen to unencrypted network traffic, collect personal or confidential
information, and then exploit that data for profit on the dark web.
Fifty-seven percent of IoT devices are vulnerable to medium-severity or high-severity attacks,
thus making IoT the “low-hanging fruit” for attackers. Because of the generally low patch level
of IoT assets, the most frequent attacks are exploits via long-known vulnerabilities and
password attacks using default device passwords.
● Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices are running outdated software: In 2019, 83
percent of medical imaging devices run on unsupported operating systems, which is a 56
percent jump from 2018, as a result of the Windows 7 operating system reaching its end of
life. This general decline in security posture presents opportunities for new attacks, such as
cryptojacking (which increased from 0 percent in 2017 to 5 percent in 2019) and brings back
long-forgotten attacks such as Conficker, which IT environments had previously been
immune to for a long time.
The IoMT devices with the most security issues are imaging systems, which represent a
critical part of the clinical workflow. For healthcare organizations, 51 percent of threats involve
imaging devices, disrupting the quality of care and allowing attackers to exfiltrate patient
data stored on these devices.
● Healthcare organizations are displaying poor network security hygiene: Seventy-two
percent of healthcare VLANs mix IoT and IT assets, allowing malware to spread from users’
computers to vulnerable IoT devices on the same network. There is a 41 percent rate of
attacks exploiting device vulnerabilities, as IT-borne attacks scan through network-connected
devices in an attempt to exploit known weaknesses. We’re seeing a shift from IoT botnets
conducting denial-of-service attacks to more sophisticated attacks targeting patient
identities, corporate data, and monetary profit via ransomware.
Zingbox IoT Guardian is a Palo Alto Networks IoT security offering that automates the orchestration of
the IoT lifecycle to provide security, management, and optimization of all assets. Zingbox IoT Guardian
uses a unique, IoT personality-based approach to secure and manage IoT devices with integrated IoT
security based on machine learning throughout their entire lifecycles, from discovery through
retirement. It allows customers to automate threat detection and response for their IT and IoT
infrastructures from a single system.
2.9.1 References
● Mayan, Gilad David. “The IoT Rundown for 2020: Stats, Risks, and Solutions.” Security Today.
January 13, 2020,
https://securitytoday.com/Articles/2020/01/13/The-IoT-Rundown-for-2020.
Cellular:
● 2G/2.5G: 2G connectivity remains a prevalent and viable IoT connectivity option due to the
low cost of 2G modules, relatively long battery life, and large installed base of 2G sensors and
M2M applications.
● 3G: IoT devices with 3G modules use either Wideband Code Division Multiple Access
(W-CDMA) or Evolved High Speed Packet Access (HSPA+ and Advanced HSPA+) to achieve
data transfer rates of 384Kbps to 168Mbps.
● 4G/Long-Term Evolution (LTE): 4G/LTE networks enable real-time IoT use cases, such as
autonomous vehicles, with 4G LTE Advanced Pro delivering speeds in excess of 3Gbps and
less than 2 milliseconds of latency.
● 5G: 5G cellular technology provides significant enhancements compared to 4G/LTE networks
and is backed by ultra-low latency, massive connectivity and scalability for IoT devices, more
efficient use of the licensed spectrum, and network slicing for application traffic prioritization.
Satellite:
● C-band: C-band satellite operates in the 4 to 8 gigahertz (GHz) range. It is used in some Wi-Fi
devices and cordless phones, and in surveillance and weather radar systems.
● L-band: L-band satellite operates in the 1 to 2GHz range. It commonly is used for radar, global
positioning systems (GPSs), radio, and telecommunications applications.
● Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT): NB-IoT provides low cost, long battery life, and high connection
density for indoor applications. It uses a subset of the LTE standard in the 200 kilohertz (kHz)
range.
● LoRa: The LoRa Alliance is driving the Long-Range Wide-Area Network (LoRaWAN) protocol
as the open global standard for secure, carrier-grade IoT low-power wide-area (LPWA)
connectivity, primarily for large-scale public networks with a single operator.
● Sigfox: Sigfox provides subscription-based global cellular LPWA connectivity for IoT devices.
The Sigfox network relies on Ultra Narrowband (UNB) modulation and operates in unlicensed
sub-GHz frequency bands.
● Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX): WiMAX is a family of wireless
broadband communications standards based on the IEEE 802.16 standards. WiMAX
applications include portable mobile broadband connectivity, smart grids and metering, and
internet failover for business continuity.
A binary (base2) numbering system comprises only two digits: 1 (“on”) and 0 (“off”). Binary
numbering is used in computers and networking because they use electrical transistors (rather than
fingers) to count. The basic function of a transistor is a gate: When electrical current is present, the
gate is closed (“1” or “on”). When no electrical current is present, the gate is open (“0” or “off”). With
only two digits, a binary numbering system increments to the next position more frequently than a
decimal numbering system. For example, the decimal number one is represented in binary as “1,”
number two is represented as “10,” number three is represented as “11,” and number four is
represented as “100.”
Unlike subnetting, which divides an IPv4 address along an arbitrary (default) classful 8-bit boundary
(8 bits for a Class A network, 16 bits for a Class B network, 24 bits for a Class C network), classless
inter-domain routing (CIDR) allocates address space on any address bit boundary (known as
variable-length subnet masking, or VLSM). For example, using CIDR, a Class A network could be
assigned a 24-bit mask (255.255.255.0, instead of the default 8-bit 255.0.0.0 mask) to limit the subnet
to only 254 addresses, or a 23-bit mask (255.255.254.0) to limit the subnet to 512 addresses.
CIDR is used to reduce the size of routing tables on internet routers by aggregating multiple
contiguous network prefixes (known as supernetting).
Key Idea
● An IP address can be represented with its subnet mask value, using “netbit”
or CIDR notation.
Key Terms
For a Class C IPv4 address, there are 254 possible node (or host) addresses. This includes 28 or 256
potential addresses, but you lose two addresses for each network: one for the base network address
and the other for the broadcast address. A typical Class C network uses a default 24-bit subnet mask
(255.255.255.0). This subnet mask value identifies the network portion of an IPv4 address, with the
first three octets being all ones (11111111 in binary notation, 255 in decimal notation). The mask displays
For example, in a network with an IPv4 address of 192.168.1.0 and a mask value of 255.255.255.0, the
network portion of the address is 192.168.1, and 254 node addresses (192.168.1.1 through 192.168.1.254)
are available. Remember, the first address (192.168.1.0) is the base network, and the last address
(192.168.1.255) is the broadcast address.
Class A and Class B IPv4 addresses use smaller mask values and support larger numbers of nodes
than Class C IPv4 addresses for their default address assignments. Class A networks use a default
8-bit (255.0.0.0) subnet mask, which provides a total of more than 16 million (256 x 256 x 256)
available IPv4 node addresses. Class B networks use a default 16-bit (255.255.0.0) subnet mask, which
provides a total of 65,534 (256 x 256, minus the network address and the broadcast address) available
IPv4 node addresses.
An IP address can be represented with its subnet mask value, using “netbit” or CIDR notation. A
netbit value represents the number of ones in the subnet mask and is displayed after an IP address,
separated by a forward slash.
Subnetting is a technique used to divide a large network into smaller, multiple subnetworks by
segmenting an IP address into two parts: the network and the host. Subnetting can be used to limit
network traffic or limit the number of devices that are visible to, or can connect to, each other.
Routers examine IP addresses and subnet values (called masks) and determine whether to forward
packets between networks. With IP addressing, the subnet mask is a required element.
Key Terms
Physical, logical, and virtual addressing in computer networks requires a basic understanding of
decimal (base10), binary (base2), and hexadecimal (base16) numbering (see Table).
The decimal (base10) numbering system comprises the numerals 0 through 9. Humans use the
decimal numbering system because we have ten fingers, so a base10 numbering system is easiest
for humans to understand.
0 0 0000
1 1 0001
2 2 0010
3 3 0011
4 4 0100
5 5 0101
6 6 0110
7 7 0111
8 8 1000
9 9 1001
10 A 1010
11 B 1011
12 C 1100
13 D 1101
14 E 1110
15 F 1111
A hexadecimal (base16) numbering system comprises 16 digits (0 through 9, and A through F).
Hexadecimal numbering is used because it is more convenient to represent a byte (which consists of
8 bits) of data as two digits in hexadecimal, rather than eight digits in binary. The decimal numbers 0
through 9 are represented as in hexadecimal “0” through “9,” respectively. However, the decimal
number 10 is represented in hexadecimal as “A,” the number 11 is represented as “B,” the number 12
is represented as “C,” the number 13 is represented as “D,” the number 14 is represented as “E,” and
The physical address of a network device, known as a media access control (MAC) address (also
referred to as a burned-in address [BIA] or hardware address), is used to forward traffic on a local
network segment. The MAC address is a unique 48-bit identifier assigned to the network adapter of
a device. If a device has multiple NICs, each NIC must have a unique MAC address. The MAC address
is usually assigned by the device manufacturer and is stored in the device read-only memory (ROM)
or firmware. MAC addresses typically are expressed in hexadecimal format with a colon or hyphen
separating each 8-bit section.
● 00:40:96:9d:68:16
The logical address of a network device, such as an IP address, is used to route traffic from one
network to another. An IP address is a unique 32-bit or 128-bit (IPv4 and IPv6, respectively) address
assigned to the NIC of a device. If a device has multiple NICs, each NIC may be assigned a unique IP
address, or multiple NICs may be assigned a virtual IP address to enable bandwidth aggregation or
failover capabilities. IP addresses are assigned statically or dynamically (most commonly using
Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol, or DHCP), typically by a network administrator or network
service provider (NSP). IPv4 addresses usually are expressed in dotted decimal notation with a dot
separating each decimal section (known as an octet).
● 192.168.0.1
IPv6 addresses typically are expressed in hexadecimal format (32 hexadecimal numbers grouped
into eight blocks) with a colon separating each block of four hexadecimal digits (known as a hextet).
● 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0008:0800:200c:417a
Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) translates a logical address, such as an IP address, to a physical
MAC address. Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP) translates a physical MAC address to a
logical address.
DHCP is a network management protocol used to dynamically assign IP addresses to devices that do
not have a statically assigned (manually configured) IP address on a TCP/IP network. Bootstrap Protocol
(BOOTP) is a similar network management protocol that is commonly used on Unix and Linux TCP/IP
networks. When a network-connected device that does not have a statically assigned IP address is
powered on, the DHCP client software on the device broadcasts a DHCPDISCOVER message on UDP
port 67. When a DHCP server on the same subnet (or a different subnet if a DHCP Helper or DHCP
Relay Agent is configured) as the client receives the DHCPDISCOVER message, it reserves an IP address
for the client and sends a DHCPOFFER message to the client on UDP port 68. The DHCPOFFER
message contains the MAC address of the client, the IP address that is being offered, the subnet mask,
the lease duration, and the IP address of the DHCP server that made the offer. When the client receives
the DHCPOFFER, it broadcasts a DHCPREQUEST message on UDP port 67, requesting the IP address
that was offered. A client may receive DHCPOFFER messages from multiple DHCP servers on a subnet
but can accept only one offer. When the DHCPREQUEST message is broadcast, the other DHCP servers
that sent an offer that was not requested (in effect, accepted) in the DHCPREQUEST message will
withdraw their offers. Finally, when the correct DHCP server receives the DHCPREQUEST message, it
sends a DHCPACK (acknowledgment) message on UDP port 68, and the IP configuration process is
completed.
Data packets are routed over a Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) network
using IP addressing information. IPv4, which is the most widely deployed version of IP, consists of a
32-bit logical IP address. The first four bits in an octet are known as the high-order bits; the first bit
in the octet is referred to as the most significant bit. The last four bits in an octet are known as the
low-order bits; the last bit in the octet is referred to as the least significant bit.
Key Idea
As shown in the following table, each bit position represents its value if the bit is “on” (1); otherwise,
the bit’s value is zero (“off” or 0).
128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
Table: Bit position values in an IPv4 address
The address range 127.0.0.1 to 127.255.255.255 is a loopback network used for testing and
troubleshooting. Packets sent to a loopback (or localhost) address such as 127.0.0.1 are immediately
routed back to the source device.
A subnet mask is a number that hides the network portion of an IPv4 address, leaving only the host
portion of the IP address. The network portion of a subnet mask is represented by contiguous “on”
(1) bits beginning with the most significant bit. For example, in the subnet mask 255.255.255.0, the
first three octets represent the network portion and the last octet represents the host portion of an
IP address. Recall that the decimal number 255 is represented in binary notation as 1111 1111.
Key Terms
The default (or standard) subnet masks for Class A, B, and C networks are:
● Class A: 255.0.0.0
● Class B: 255.255.0.0
● Class C: 255.255.255.0
Several IPv4 address ranges are reserved for use in private networks and are not routable on the
internet, including:
● 10.0.0.0–10.255.255.255 (Class A)
● 172.16.0.0–172.31.255.255 (Class B)
● 192.168.0.0–192.168.255.255 (Class C)
IPv6 addresses consist of 32 hexadecimal numbers grouped into eight hextets of four hexadecimal
digits, separated by a colon. A hexadecimal digit is represented by 4 bits (see Table 2-1), so each
hextet is 16 bits (four 4-bit hexadecimal digits), and eight 16-bit hextets equals 128 bits.
An IPv6 address is further divided into two 64-bit segments: The first (also referred to as the “top” or
“upper”) 64 bits represent the network part of the address, and the last (also referred to as the
“bottom” or “lower”) 64 bits represent the node or interface part of the address. The network part is
further subdivided into a 48-bit global network address and a 16-bit subnet. The node or interface
part of the address is based on the MAC address of the node or interface.
● xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx
Where x represents a hexadecimal digit (0–f).
● 2001:0db8:0000:0000:0008:0800:200c:417a
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has defined several rules to simplify an IPv6 address:
● Leading zeros in an individual hextet can be omitted, but each hextet must have at least one
hexadecimal digit, except as noted in the next rule. Application of this rule to the previous
example yields this result: 2001:db8:0:0:8:800:200c:417a.
● Two colons (::) can be used to represent one or more groups of 16 bits of zeros, and leading or
trailing zeroes in an address; the two colons (::) can appear only once in an IPv6 address.
Application of this rule to the previous example yields this result: 2001:db8::8:800:200c:417a.
● In mixed IPv4 and IPv6 environments, the form x:x:x:x:x;x:d.d.d.d can be used, in which x
represents the six high-order 16-bit hextets of the address and d represents the four
low-order 8-bit octets (in standard IPv4 notation) of the address. For example,
0db8:0:0:0:0:FFFF:129.144.52.38 is a valid IPv6 address. Application of the previous two rules to
this example yields this result: db8::ffff:129.144.52.38.
IPv6 security features are specified in Request for Comments (RFC) 7112 and include techniques to
prevent fragmentation exploits in IPv6 headers and implementation of Internet Protocol Security
(IPsec) at the Network layer of the OSI model.
A default gateway is a network device, such as a router or switch, to which an endpoint sends
network traffic when a specific destination IP address is not specified by an application or service, or
when the endpoint does not know how to reach a specified destination.
2.14.1 Identify the order of the layers of both OSI and TCP/IP models
The OSI model is defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO, not an acronym
but the adopted organizational name from the Greek isos, meaning “equal”) and consists of seven
layers:
● Application (Layer 7 or L7): This layer identifies and establishes availability of communication
partners, determines resource availability, and synchronizes communication.
● Presentation (Layer 6 or L6): This layer provides coding and conversion functions (such as data
representation, character conversion, data compression, and data encryption) to ensure that
data sent from the Application layer of one system is compatible with the Application layer of
the receiving system.
● Session (Layer 5 or L5): This layer manages communication sessions (service requests and
service responses) between networked systems, including connection establishment, data
transfer, and connection release.
● Transport (Layer 4 or L4): This layer provides transparent, reliable data transport and
end-to-end transmission control.
● Network (Layer 3 or L3): This layer provides routing and related functions that enable data to
be transported between systems on the same network or on interconnected networks.
Routing protocols are defined at this layer. Logical addressing of devices on the network is
accomplished at this layer using routed protocols such as Internet Protocol (IP). Routers
operate at the Network layer of the OSI model.
● Data Link (Layer 2): This layer ensures that messages are delivered to the proper device
across a physical network link.
● Physical (Layer 1 or L1): This layer sends and receives bits across the network medium
(cabling or wireless links) from one device to another. It specifies the electrical, mechanical,
and functional requirements of the network, including network topology, cabling and
connectors, and interface types, and the process for converting bits to electrical (or light)
signals that can be transmitted across the physical medium.
The TCP/IP model was developed by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and actually preceded
the OSI model. Whereas the OSI model is a theoretical model used to logically describe networking
processes, the TCP/IP model defines actual networking requirements, including, for example, for
frame construction. The TCP/IP model consists of four layers:
● Application (Layer 4 or L4): This layer consists of network applications and processes.
● Transport (Layer 3 or L3): This layer provides end-to-end delivery.
● Internet (Layer 2 or L2): This layer defines the IP datagram and routing.
● Network Access (Layer 1 or L1): Also referred to as the Link layer, this layer contains routines
for accessing physical networks.
Application (Layer 4 or L4): This layer loosely corresponds to Layers 5 through 7 of the OSI model.
Transport (Layer 3 or L3): This layer corresponds to Layer 4 of the OSI model.
Internet (Layer 2 or L2): This layer corresponds to Layer 3 of the OSI model.
Network Access (Layer 1 or L1): This layer corresponds to Layers 1 and 2 of the OSI model.
● Application (Layer 7 or L7): This layer identifies and establishes availability of communication
partners, determines resource availability, and synchronizes communication. Protocols that
function at the Application layer include:
○ File Transfer Protocol (FTP): Used to copy files from one system to another on TCP
ports 20 (the data port) and 21 (the control port)
○ Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP): Used for communication between web servers
and web browsers on TCP port 80
○ Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS): Used for SSL/TLS encrypted
communications between web servers and web browsers on TCP port 443 (and other
ports, such as 8443)
○ Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP): A store-and-forward electronic mail
protocol that allows an email client to access, manage, and synchronize email on a
remote mail server on TCP and UDP port 143
○ Post Office Protocol Version 3 (POP3): An email retrieval protocol that allows an
email client to access email on a remote mail server on TCP port 110
○ Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP): Used to send and receive email across the
internet on TCP/UDP port 25
● Network (Layer 3 or L3): This layer provides routing and related functions that enable data
transportation between systems on the same network or on interconnected networks.
Routing protocols are defined at this layer. Logical addressing of devices on the network is
accomplished at this layer using routed protocols such as Internet Protocol (IP). Routers
operate at the Network layer of the OSI model.
● Data Link (Layer 2): This layer ensures that messages are delivered to the proper device
across a physical network link. This layer also defines the networking protocol (for example,
Ethernet) used to send and receive data between individual devices and formats messages
from the layers into frames for transmission, handles point-to-point synchronization and error
control, and can perform link encryption. Switches typically operate at Layer 2 of the OSI
model (although multilayer switches that operate at different layers also exist). The Data Link
layer is further divided into two sublayers:
○ Logical Link Control (LLC): The LLC sublayer provides an interface for the MAC
sublayer; manages the control, sequencing, and acknowledgment of frames being
passed up to the Network layer or down to the Physical layer; and manages timing
and flow control.
○ Media access control (MAC): The MAC sublayer is responsible for framing and
performs error control using a cyclic redundancy check (CRC), identifies MAC
addresses, and controls media access.
● Physical (Layer 1 or L1): This layer sends and receives bits across the network medium
(cabling or wireless links) from one device to another. It specifies the electrical, mechanical,
and functional requirements of the network, including network topology, cabling and
connectors, and interface types, and the process for converting bits to electrical (or light)
signals that can be transmitted across the physical medium.
Packets on their way to the destination computer typically traverse several network and security
devices (such as switches, routers, and firewalls) before reaching the destination computer, where
the encapsulation process described is reversed.
Key Terms
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls are built on a single-pass architecture, which is a
unique integration of software and hardware that simplifies management, streamlines processing,
and maximizes performance. The single-pass architecture integrates multiple threat prevention
disciplines (IPS, anti-malware, URL filtering, etc.) into a single stream-based engine with a uniform
signature format. This architecture allows traffic to be fully analyzed in a single pass without the
performance degradation seen in multifunction gateways. The software is associated directly to a
parallel processing hardware platform that uses function-specific processors for threat prevention, to
maximize throughput and minimize latency.
The use of one common engine means that two key benefits are realized. First, unlike file proxies
that need to download the entire file before they can scan the traffic, a stream-based engine scans
traffic in real time, reassembling packets only as needed and only in very small amounts. Second,
unlike with traditional approaches, all traffic can be scanned with a single engine, instead of multiple
scanning engines.
Organizations deploy next-generation firewalls at the network perimeter and inside the network at
logical trust boundaries. All traffic crossing the next-generation firewall undergoes a full-stack,
single-pass inspection, providing the complete context of the application, associated content, and user
identity. With this level of context, you can align security with your key business initiatives.
2.17 Describe the application of NGFW deployment options (i.e., PA-,VM- and CN-Series)
CN-Series
CN-Series is the container native version of the ML-powered Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) that
is designed specifically for Kubernetes environments. CN-Series container firewalls help network
security teams safeguard developers with deep security integration into Kubernetes orchestration.
Deploy the CN-Series to secure traffic between pods in different trust zones and namespaces, for
protection against known and zero-day malware, and to block data exfiltration from your
containerized environments.
2.18 Differentiate between intrusion detection systems and intrusion prevention systems
An Intrusion Detection System (IDS) is a network security technology originally built for detecting
vulnerability exploits against a target application or computer. Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)
extended IDS solutions by adding the ability to block threats in addition to detecting them and has
become the dominant deployment option for IDS/IPS technologies. This article will elaborate on the
configuration and functions that define the IDS deployment.
An IDS needs only to detect threats and as such is placed out-of-band on the network infrastructure,
meaning that it is not in the true real-time communication path between the sender and receiver of
information. Rather, IDS solutions will often take advantage of a TAP or SPAN port to analyze a copy of
the inline traffic stream (and thus ensuring that IDS does not impact inline network performance).
2.18.2 References
● Intrusion Prevention System,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-an-intrusion-prevention-system-ips
● Intrusion Detection System,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-an-intrusion-detection-system-ids
A virtual private network (VPN) allows you to safely connect to another network over the internet by
encrypting the connection from your device. A VPN makes your internet connection more secure and
offers both privacy and anonymity online. Organizations, governments and businesses of all sizes use
VPNs to secure remote connections to the internet for protection against malicious actors, malware and
other cyberthreats. Personal VPNs have also become widely popular as they keep users’ locations
private, safely encrypt data and allow users to browse the web anonymously.
Different Types
There are two types of VPN:
● Site-to-site VPN is used to connect branch offices to a central office over the internet when
distance prevents direct network connections.
● Remote access VPN allows individual users to remotely connect to a central network. In this
case, the devices are referred to as endpoints.
VPN client software typically is installed on mobile endpoints, such as laptop computers and
smartphones, to extend a network beyond the physical boundaries of the organization. The VPN
client connects to a VPN server, such as a firewall, router, or VPN appliance (or concentrator). After a
VPN tunnel is established, a remote user can access network resources such as file servers, printers,
and Voice over IP (VoIP) phones in the same way as if they were physically located in the office.
OpenVPN
OpenVPN is a highly secure, open-source VPN implementation that uses SSL/TLS encryption for key
exchange. OpenVPN uses up to 256-bit encryption and can run over TCP or UDP. Although it is not
natively supported by most major operating systems, it has been ported to most major operating
systems, including mobile device operating systems.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 100
Internet Protocol Security
IPsec is a secure communications protocol that authenticates and encrypts IP packets in a
communication session. An IPsec VPN requires compatible VPN client software to be installed on
the endpoint device. A group password or key is required for configuration. Client-server IPsec VPNs
typically require user action to initiate the connection, such as launching the client software and
logging in with a username and password.
A security association (SA) in IPsec defines how two or more entities will securely communicate over
the network using IPsec. A single Internet Key Exchange (IKE) SA is established between
communicating entities to initiate the IPsec VPN tunnel. Separate IPsec SAs are then established for
each communication direction in a VPN session.
An IPsec VPN can be configured to force all of the user’s internet traffic back through an
organization’s firewall, thus providing optimal protection with enterprise-grade security but with
some performance loss. Or split tunneling can be configured to allow internet traffic from the device
to go directly to the internet, while other specific types of traffic route through the IPsec tunnel, for
acceptable protection with much less performance degradation.
If split tunneling is used, a personal firewall should be configured and active on the organization’s
endpoints because a split tunneling configuration can create a “side door” into the organization’s
network. Attackers essentially can bridge themselves over the internet, through the client endpoint,
and into the network over the IPsec tunnel.
Key Idea
Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) is an asymmetric encryption protocol used to secure communication
sessions. SSL has been superseded by Transport Layer Security (TLS), although SSL still is the more
commonly used terminology.
SSL VPN technology has become the de facto standard and preferred method of connecting remote
endpoint devices back to the enterprise network, and IPsec is most commonly used in site-to-site or
device-to-device VPN connections, such as connecting a branch office network to a headquarters
location network or data center.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 101
Key Terms
Data loss prevention (DLP) is a security strategy that ensures sensitive or confidential information
doesn’t leak outside of the corporate network in a way that is unsafe or non-compliant.
Today, most enterprises face challenges in implementing effective data security because of:
● A lack of granular visibility into what, how, and where their employees access and use their data,
or transfer and share it with others.
● Limited control over data stored in the cloud, which creates security gaps
● Inconsistent data security due to the varying security capabilities of public and private cloud
providers, network security, and SaaS.
● The growing number of data breaches and insider threats caused by well-meaning employees,
malicious insiders, and cyber criminals.
To successfully overcome these challenges, it’s crucial for companies to put a solid DLP strategy in
place. An effective data security strategy requires discovering and securing data while it’s at rest, in use,
and in motion. Monitoring the transmission of data both inside and outside of the organization and
proactively detecting and stopping data leakage is another important requirement.
This is where an innovative enterprise DLP security solution comes in to fill in the gaps.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 102
2.21.1 Classify different types of data (e.g., sensitive, inappropriate)
Network data loss prevention (DLP) solutions inspect data that is leaving, or egressing, a network (for
example, via email, file transfer, or internet uploads, or by copying to a USB thumb drive) and prevent
certain sensitive data as based on defined policies from leaving the network. Sensitive data may
include:
● Personally identifiable information (PII) such as names, addresses, birthdates, Social Security
numbers, health records (including electronic medical records, or EMRs, and electronic
health records, or EHRs), and financial data (such as bank account numbers and credit card
numbers)
● Classified materials (such as military or national security information)
● Intellectual property, trade secrets, and other confidential or proprietary company
information
A DLP security solution prevents sensitive data from being transmitted outside the network by a
user, either inadvertently or maliciously. A robust DLP solution can detect the presence of certain
data patterns even if the data is encrypted.
However, these solutions introduce a potential new vulnerability in the network because they have
visibility into, and the ability to decrypt, all data on the network. Other methods rely on decryption
happening elsewhere, such as on a web security appliance or other man-in-the-middle decryption
engine.
Key Terms
2.21.2 References
● Data Loss Prevention – Protecting Your Sensitive Enterprise Data,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/data-loss-prevention-protecting-your-sensitive-e
nterprise-data#:~:text=Data%20loss%20prevention%20(DLP)%20is,is%20unsafe%20or%20non%2
Dcompliant.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 103
2.22 Differentiate the various types of security functions from those integrated into UTM devices
Unified threat management (UTM) devices combine numerous security functions into a single
appliance, including:
● Anti-malware
● Anti-spam
● Content filtering
● DLP
● Firewall (stateful inspection)
● IDS/IPS
● VPN
UTM devices don’t necessarily perform any of these security functions better than their standalone
counterparts, but they nonetheless serve a purpose in small to medium-size enterprise networks as
a convenient and inexpensive solution that gives an organization an all-in-one security device.
Typical disadvantages of UTM include:
● They sometimes have reduced feature sets to make them more affordable.
● All security functions use the same processor and memory resources. Enablement of all the
functions of a UTM can result in up to a 97 percent drop in throughput and performance, as
compared to top-end throughput without security features enabled.
Despite numerous security functions running on the same platform, the individual engines operate
in silos with little or no integration or cooperation between them.
Traditional endpoint security encompasses numerous security tools, such as anti-malware software,
anti-spyware software, personal firewalls, host-based intrusion prevention systems (HIPSs), and mobile
device management (MDM) software. Endpoint security also requires implementation of effective
endpoint security best practices, including patch management and configuration management.
Most organizations deploy several security products to protect their endpoints, including personal
firewalls, HIPSs, MDM, mobile application management (MAM), DLP, and antivirus software.
Nevertheless, cyber breaches continue to increase in frequency, variety, and sophistication. The
numbers and types of endpoints, including mobile and IoT devices, also has grown exponentially and
increased the attack surface. New variants of the Gafgyt, Mirai, and Muhstik botnets, among others,
specifically target IoT devices, and new search engines such as Shodan (Shodan.io) can automate the
search for vulnerable internet-connected endpoints. Traditional endpoint security solutions and
antivirus no longer can prevent security breaches on the endpoint in the rapidly changing threat
landscape.
Endpoint security is an essential element of cybersecurity because the network firewall cannot
completely protect hosts from zero-day exploits. Zero-day exploits target unknown vulnerabilities in
operating systems and application software on host machines. Network firewalls may not be able to
block an attacker’s delivery of a zero-day exploit until a new signature identifying the zero-day attack
has been developed and delivered to the firewall.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 104
Network firewalls also may be restricted from decrypting all traffic because of regulations and laws. This
restriction provides a window of opportunity for attackers to bypass a firewall’s protection and exploit a
host machine, thus necessitating endpoint security protection. Endpoint security protection is provided
by an application that runs on the host machine. Effective endpoint security must be able to stop
malware, exploits, and ransomware before they can compromise the host, provide protection while
endpoints are online and offline, and detect threats and automate containment to minimize impact.
The primary difference between an IDS and an IPS is that an IDS is considered to be a passive
system, whereas an IPS is an active system. An IDS monitors and analyzes network activity and
provides alerts to potential attacks and vulnerabilities on the network, but it doesn’t perform any
preventive action to stop an attack. An IPS, however, performs all of the same functions as an IDS but
also automatically blocks or drops suspicious, pattern-matching activity on the network in real time.
However, an IPS has some disadvantages, including:
● It must be placed inline along a network boundary and thus is directly susceptible to attack
itself.
● False alarms must be properly identified and filtered to avoid inadvertently blocking
authorized users and applications. A false positive occurs when legitimate traffic is improperly
identified as malicious traffic. A false negative occurs when malicious traffic is improperly
identified as legitimate traffic.
● It may be used to deploy a denial-of-service (DoS) attack by flooding the IPS, thus causing it
to block connections until no connection or bandwidth is available.
This poor “catch rate” is due to several factors. Some malware can mutate or can be updated to avoid
detection by traditional anti-malware signatures. Also, advanced malware is increasingly specialized
to the point where an attacker can develop customized malware that is targeted against a specific
individual or organization.
Traditional anti-malware software uses various approaches to detect and respond to malware threats,
including signature-based, container-based, application allow lists , and anomaly-based techniques.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 105
Note: With the proliferation of advanced malware such as remote access trojans (RATs), anti-AV, and
root kits/boot kits, security vendors have largely rebranded their antivirus solutions as “anti-malware”
and expanded their malware protections to encompass the broader malware classifications.
● Quarantine: Isolates the infected file so that it cannot infect the endpoint or other files
● Delete: Removes the infected file
● Alert: Notifies the user (and/or system administrator) that malware has been detected
Updated signatures must be regularly and frequently downloaded from the security vendor and
installed on the organization’s endpoints. Download and processing of signature files in this manner
can cause noticeable performance degradations on the networks and endpoints on which they are
running.
Although the signature-based approach is very popular, its effectiveness is limited. By design, it is a
reactive countermeasure because a signature file for new malware can’t be created and delivered until
the malware is already “in the wild,” during which time networks and endpoints are blind to the threat:
the notorious zero-day threat (or attack). The “zero-day” label is misleading, however, because the
number of days from release to detection averages 5 to 20 days.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 106
A sample of new or unknown suspicious traffic first must be captured and identified before a
detection signature can be created by security vendors. The new signature then must be
downloaded and installed on an organization’s endpoints to provide protection.
This process means that some users and networks will be successfully breached by new malware
until a new detection signature is created, downloaded, and installed. This reactive model creates a
window of opportunity for attackers, leaving endpoints vulnerable, sometimes for weeks or even
months, until new malware is suspected, collected, analyzed, and identified. During this time,
attackers can infect networks and endpoints.
Another challenge for the signature-based approach is that millions of new malware variations are
created each year (on average about 20,000 new forms daily), for which unique signatures must be
written, tested, and deployed after the new malware variation is discovered and sampled. Despite
the fact that 70 percent of these millions of malware variations are based on a relatively limited
number of malware “families” numbering just seven in 2005 and increasing to only 20 over the past
decade, this reactive approach is not effective for protecting endpoints against modern malware
threats.
Also, advanced malware uses techniques such as metamorphism and polymorphism to take
advantage of the inherent weaknesses of signature-based detection to avoid being discovered in
the wild and to circumvent signatures that have already been created.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 107
Step 2: Block public DNS and SMTP applications.
Rule Highlights
● Use the Reset both client and server Action to send a TCP reset message to both the
client-side and server-side devices.
● Enable logging for traffic matching so that you can investigate a potential threat on your
network.
Application allow lists are another endpoint protection technique that is commonly used to prevent
end users from running unauthorized applications, including malware, on their endpoints.
Application allow lists require a positive control model in which no applications are permitted to run
on the endpoint unless explicitly permitted to do so by the allow list policy. In practice, application
allow lists require a large administrative effort to establish and maintain a list of approved
applications. This approach is based on the premise that if you create a list of applications that are
specifically allowed and then prevent any other file from executing, you can protect the endpoint.
Although this basic functionality can be useful to reduce the attack surface, it is not a
comprehensive approach to endpoint security.
Modern trends such as cloud and mobile computing, consumerization, and bring your own device
(BYOD) and bring your own access (BYOA) make application allow lists extremely difficult to enforce
in the enterprise. Also, after an application is added to an allow list, it is permitted to run, even if the
application has a vulnerability that can be exploited. An attacker then can simply exploit an allowed
application and have complete control of the target endpoint regardless of the allow list. After the
application has been successfully exploited, the attacker can run malicious code while keeping all of
the activity in memory. Because no new files are created and no new executables attempt to run,
allow-list software is rendered ineffective against this type of attack.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 108
Key Terms
2.23.7 Reference
2.24 Identify differences in managing wireless devices compared to other endpoint devices
There are several challenges that must be addressed when attempting to manage wireless devices:
1. Links
A clear understanding of network topology is required to properly manage a wireless network. This
includes not just the access points, connected end-points, and other stations, but also the types of links
(active, standby, or backup) being utilized for access to the network.
2. Client tracking
Managing and tracking the clients connected to a wireless access point in a network is another
fundamental challenge for managing wireless environments. Clients attached to an access point are
typically dynamic. As a result, client connectivity maps give meaningful insights for proper planning.
One example of an insight would be the identification of usage patterns for clients as they dynamically
switch connectivity between various access points within an environment.
3. Throughput
For wireless connections, throughput depends on the signal strength and interference from other
access points. As a result, clients get different throughput at different locations. Problematic areas must
be identified so that network administrators might make adjustments to coverage. Topology diagrams
are one tool that can help with planning for the potential throughput requirements of an environment.
4. Dynamic discovery
Many wireless networks allow the dynamic addition of new access points, and the discovery and
provisioning of new access points is often a requirement for the management of dynamic networks.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 109
5. Inspections
Since wireless networks are highly dynamic, and the network topology of a wireless network can
change very often, the tracking and identification of such network changes becomes essential for the
administrators to have any chance of maintaining a healthy environment. To achieve this, the status of
the wireless devices should be checked frequently. A device’s status may be obtained via various
methods, including asynchronous notifications from the device (such as SNMP traps and TL1
autonomous messages) and polling.
Identity and access management (IAM) is a software service or framework that allows organizations to
define user or group identities within software environments, then associate permissions with them.
The identities and permissions are usually spelled out in a text file, which is referred to as an IAM policy.
As an example of an IAM policy, a team could create a rule that grants a specific user the right to list files
within an object storage bucket in the cloud. Or, an IAM policy could grant a group of users in a branch
office the ability to both read and upload files to a local database.
These are just basic examples. In a large-scale environment, a team might maintain dozens or even
hundreds of different IAM policies. The policies can be used to manage access rights for any of the
dozens of services that the organization may use, either on-premises or in the cloud.
Identity and access management is important because it allows organizations to share IT resources
among multiple users and groups. It helps organizations establish trust for who can be signed in to an
account (authentication) while at the same time ensuring that each user or group has only the specific
access rights that he or she requires (authorization).
Without IAM, teams would struggle to manage access rights in an efficient way. They would have to rely
on alternatives such as creating an entirely separate cloud computing account for each user. That
would be inefficient to manage, and would make it difficult to share cloud resources between users.
They could also simply allow every user within their team to have the same level of access to every
resource in their environment. But that would be insecure because each individual typically needs to
access only certain resources. For example, developers who work for the HR department may need to
access databases and virtual machines associated only with their applications, while other developers
who build software for the finance department require different permissions. If you were to give all
developers access to all resources, you would increase the risk of security oversights and exposures.
With IAM, it’s easy to ensure that each user and group has exactly the level of access rights he, she, or
they need – no more and no less. Doing so adheres to the principle of least privilege, which states that
access rights should be restricted to the minimum necessary for a user to complete his or her work.
Authentication is a method for protecting services and applications by verifying the identities of users
so that only legitimate users have access. Several firewall and Panorama features require
authentication. Administrators authenticate to access the web interface, CLI, or XML API of the firewall
and Panorama. End users authenticate through Captive Portal or GlobalProtect to access various
services and applications. You can choose from several authentication services to protect your network
and to accommodate your existing security infrastructure while ensuring a smooth user experience.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 110
Single-factor Authentication
The firewall and Panorama can use external servers to control administrative access to the web
interface and end user access to services or applications through Captive Portal and GlobalProtect.
In this context, any authentication service that is not local to the firewall or Panorama is considered
external, regardless of whether the service is internal (such as Kerberos) or external (such as a SAML
identity provider) relative to your network.
You can Configure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) to ensure that each user authenticates using
multiple methods (factors) when accessing highly sensitive services and applications. For example,
you can force users to enter a login password and then enter a verification code that they receive by
phone before allowing access to important financial documents. This approach helps to prevent
attackers from accessing every service and application in your network just by stealing passwords. Of
course, not every service and application requires the same degree of protection, and MFA might
not be necessary for less sensitive services and applications that users access frequently. To
accommodate a variety of security needs, you can Configure Authentication Policy rules that trigger
MFA or a single authentication factor (such as login credentials or certificates) based on specific
services, applications, and end users.
Identity and Access Management (IAM) provides authentication, authorization, and access control
functions. IAM tools provide control for the provisioning, maintenance, and operation of user identities
and the level of access to network, data center, and cloud resources that different identities are
permitted.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 111
Directory services
A directory service is a database that contains information about users, resources, and services in a
network. The directory service associates users and network permissions to control who has access to
which resources and services on the network. Directory services include:
● Active Directory: A centralized directory service developed by Microsoft for Windows networks to
provide authentication and authorization of users and network resources. Active Directory uses
Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), Kerberos, and the Domain Name System (DNS).
● Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): An IP-based client-server protocol that provides
access and manages directory information in TCP/IP networks
Role-based access control (RBAC) is a method for implementing discretionary access controls in
which access decisions are based on group membership, according to organizational or functional
roles.
Attribute-based access control (ABAC) is a way to provide and manage user access to IT services to
support areas that require more contextual awareness than simple user-focused parameters as an
assigned role.
DAC stands for Discretionary Access Control. The app owner has complete control over who can
access a particular service. An application can be a file, directory, or any other, which can be
accessed via the network. Can grant permission to other users to access the app.
Media access control (MAC) address is a unique 48-bit or 64-bit identifier assigned to a network
interface card (NIC) for communications at the Data Link layer of the OSI model.
User and group information must be directly integrated into the technology platforms that secure
modern organizations. Knowing who is using the applications on your network, and who may have
transmitted a threat or is transferring files, strengthens security policies and reduces incident
response times. User-ID, a standard feature on Palo Alto Networks next-generation firewalls, enables
you to leverage user information stored in a wide range of repositories.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 112
● User-Based Analysis, Reporting, and Forensics
Informative reports on user activities can be generated using any one of the pre-defined reports
or by creating a custom report.
2.25.5 References
● Authentication Types,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/9-1/pan-os-admin/authentication/authentication-type
s
● User-ID, https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/technologies/user-id
2.26 Describe the integration of NGFWs with the cloud, networks, and Endpoints
After creating rulestacks on your Cloud NGFW tenant, you can create associations between them and
NGFW resources and NGFW endpoints. Upon creation, a NGFW is associated with the specified VPC.
NGFW endpoints are constructs created – manually or automatically – in each availability zone in the
VPC that you specify.
The NGFW is a firewall resource, dedicated to the VPC you specify, that provides next-generation
firewall capabilities. The NGFW applies your security policy to the traffic received by the NGFW
endpoints and enforces that policy. When creating your NGFW, you must specify a VPC and local
rulestack. Additionally, you must also specify how and where the associated NGFW endpoints are
deployed.
NGFW endpoints are responsible for directing traffic to the NGFW for inspection and enforcement.
NGFW endpoints intercept traffic and route it to the NGFW for inspection and policy enforcement.
There are two management modes that can be used to create endpoints automatically or manually.
● In a service-managed mode, the Cloud NGFW tenant creates an endpoint in each subnet you
specify. The NGFW service retrieves a list of subnets in the VPC you specified and you choose the
subnets from that list that should have an endpoint.
● In a customer-managed mode, you choose existing availability zones that need to be secured in
your specified VPC, then manually create the NGFW endpoints in existing subnets in the chosen
availability zones. After the NGFW has been created, you must go to the AWS console to
complete the NGFW endpoint creation process.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 113
2.27 Describe App-ID, User-ID, and Content-ID
Application identification
Stateful packet inspection technology, which is the basis for most of today’s legacy firewalls, was
created more than 25 years ago, at a time when applications could be controlled using ports and
source/destination IP addresses. The strict adherence to port-based classification and control
methodology is the primary policy element; it is hard-coded into the foundation and cannot be
turned off. As a result, many of today’s applications cannot be identified, much less controlled, by the
firewall, and no amount of “after the fact” traffic classification by firewall “helpers” can correct the
firewall port-based classification.
Establishment of port and protocol information is a first step in application identification, but it is
insufficient by itself. Robust application identification and inspection in a next-generation firewall
enables granular control of the flow of sessions through the firewall. Identification is based on the
specific applications (such as Skype, Gmail, and WebEx) that are being used, instead of just relying
on the underlying set of often indistinguishable network communication services.
Application identification provides visibility and control over work-related and non-work-related
applications that can evade detection by legacy port-based firewalls, for example, by masquerading
as legitimate traffic, hopping ports, or using encryption to slip past the firewall.
Application identification (App-ID) technology in a Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall does
not rely on a single element, such as port or protocol. Instead, App-ID uses multiple mechanisms to
first determine what the application is, and the application identity then becomes the basis for the
firewall policy that is applied to the session. App-ID is highly extensible, and, as applications continue
to evolve, application detection mechanisms can be added or updated as a means of keeping pace
with the ever-changing application landscape.
Many organizations are not fully aware of the number of applications in use, how heavily they are
used, or by whom. This lack of visibility forces organizations to implement negative (block list)
enforcement approaches where they selectively block traffic and destinations known to be a risk to
the organization. The next-generation firewall also allows you to implement a positive (allow list)
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 114
enforcement policy where you selectively allow the applications required to run your organization. A
key to positive enforcement is App-ID. App-ID identifies the applications traversing the firewall,
regardless of port or protocol, even if the traffic is tunneled in Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)
tunnels, uses evasive tactics, or is encrypted. App-ID can determine the difference between base
applications and application functions. This level of visibility brings a complete understanding of the
applications on your network and their value and risk to your organization.
The first task that a Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall executes is using App-ID to identify the
applications traversing the network. App-ID uses a multifaceted approach to determine the
application’s identity, irrespective of port, protocol, encryption (SSL and SSH), or other evasive tactics
employed. The number and order of identification mechanisms used to identify the application vary
depending on the application. The application identification techniques used include:
● Application signatures: To identify an application, App-ID first uses signatures to look for
unique application properties and related transaction characteristics. The signature also
determines whether the application is using its default port or a non-standard port.
Context-based signatures look for unique properties and transaction characteristics to
correctly identify the application regardless of the port and protocol being used. These
signatures include the ability to detect specific functions within applications (such as file
transfers within SaaS applications). If the security policy allows the identified application,
App-ID further analyzes the traffic to identify more granular applications and scan for threats.
● TLS/SSL and SSH decryption: If App-ID determines that TLS/SSL encryption is in use, it can
decrypt and re-evaluate the traffic. App-ID uses a similar approach with SSH to determine
whether port forwarding is being used to tunnel traffic over SSH.
● Application and protocol decoding: For known protocols, decoders apply additional
context-based signatures to detect applications tunneling inside the protocols. Decoders
validate that traffic conforms to the protocol specification, and they support network address
translation (NAT) traversal and opening dynamic pinholes for applications such as Voice over
IP (VoIP) or File Transfer Protocol (FTP). Decoders for popular applications also identify the
individual functions within the application. In addition to identifying applications, decoders
identify files and other content to be scanned for threats or sensitive data.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 115
Figure: How Palo Alto Networks App-ID classifies applications
With App-ID as the foundational element for every Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall,
administrators can regain visibility into, and control over, the applications traversing the network.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 116
The list of App-IDs is updated monthly, with new applications added based on input from the Palo
Alto Networks community (customers, partners) and market trends. All App-IDs are classified by
category, subcategory, technology, and risk rating. The security policy can use these classifications to
automatically support new applications as the App-ID list expands. Alternatively, you can specify that
you want to review new applications and determine how they are treated before the new list is
installed.
Despite regular updates, unknown application traffic inevitably still will be detected on the network,
such as:
● Unknown commercial applications: Administrators can use the ACC and the log viewer to
quickly determine whether an unknown application is a commercial application.
Administrators can use the packet capture (pcap) feature on the Palo Alto Networks
Next-Generation Firewall to record the traffic and submit it for App-ID development. The new
App-ID is developed, tested with the organization, and then added to the global database for
all users.
● Internal or custom applications: Administrators can use the ACC and the log viewer to quickly
determine whether an unknown application is an internal or custom application. You can
develop a custom App-ID for the application, using the exposed protocol decoders. The
protocol decoders that have been exposed include:
○ FTP (File Transfer Protocol)
○ HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol) and HTTPS (HTTP Secure, or HTTP over SSL)
○ IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) and SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol)
○ RTSP (Real Time Streaming Protocol)
○ Telnet
○ Unknown-TCP, unknown-UDP, and file body (for html/pdf/flv/swf/riff/mov)
After the custom App-ID is developed, traffic identified by it is treated in the same manner as the
previously classified traffic: It can be enabled via policy, inspected for threats, shaped using quality of
service (QoS), etc. Alternatively, users can create and apply an application override, which effectively
renames the application. Custom App-ID entries are managed in a separate database on the
next-generation firewall to ensure they are not impacted by weekly App-ID updates.
An important point to highlight is that Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls use a positive
enforcement model, which means that all traffic can be denied except those applications explicitly
allowed via policy. This positive enforcement model means that in some cases the unknown traffic
can be easily blocked or tightly controlled. Alternative offerings that are based on IPS will allow
unknown traffic to pass through without providing any semblance of visibility or control.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 117
Application identification and policy control
Application identification enables administrators to see the applications on the network, learn how
they work, and analyze their behavioral characteristics and relative risk. When application
identification is used in conjunction with user identification, administrators can see exactly who is
using the application based on their identity, rather than just an IP address. With this information,
administrators can use granular rules based on a positive security model to block unknown
applications, while enabling, inspecting, and shaping those applications that are allowed.
After an application has been identified and a complete picture of its use is gained, organizations
can apply policies with a range of responses that are far more granular than the “allow” or “deny”
actions available in legacy firewalls. Examples include:
● Allow or deny
● Allow but scan for exploits, viruses, and other threats
● Allow based on schedule, users, or groups
● Decrypt and inspect
● Apply traffic shaping through QoS
● Apply policy-based forwarding
● Allow certain application functions
● Any combination of the preceding examples
App-ID uses an application hierarchy that follows a “container and supporting function” model to
help administrators easily choose which applications to allow, while blocking or controlling
functions within the application. The figure below shows SharePoint as the container application
and the individual functions within it.
Figure: Application function control maximizes productivity by safely enabling the application itself (Microsoft SharePoint) or
individual functions.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 118
User-ID
Creation and management of security policies on a next-generation firewall, based on the
application and the identity of the user regardless of device or location, is a more effective means of
protecting the network than relying solely on port and IP address information in legacy, port-based
firewalls. User-ID enables organizations to leverage user information stored in a wide range of
repositories for the following purposes:
● Visibility: Improved visibility into application use based on user and group information can
help organizations maintain a more accurate view of network activity.
● Policy control: Binding user information to the security policy helps organizations to safely
enable applications or specific application functions while reducing the administrative effort
associated with employee moves, adds, and changes.
● Logging and reporting: If a security incident occurs, forensics analysis and reporting can
include user information, which provides a more complete view of the incident.
User-ID in action
User-ID seamlessly integrates Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls with a wide range of
user repositories and terminal services environments. Depending on the network environment,
multiple techniques can be configured to accurately map the user identity to an IP address. Events
include authentication events, user authentication, terminal services monitoring, client probing,
directory services integration, and a powerful XML API.
Figure: User-ID integrates enterprise directories for user-based policies, reporting, and forensics.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 119
After the applications and users are identified, full visibility and control within the Application
Command Center (ACC), policy editing, and logging and reporting are available. User-ID tools and
techniques include:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 120
● XML API: In some cases, organizations already may have a user repository or an application
that is used to store information about users and their current IP address. In these scenarios,
the XML API within User-ID enables rapid integration of user information with security
policies. The XML API provides a programmatic way to map users to IP addresses through
integrations with partner technologies, such as Aruba ClearPass and Aruba Mobility
Controllers. Use of the XML API to collect user and IP address information includes:
● Wireless environments: Organizations using 802.1x to secure corporate wireless networks
can leverage a syslog-based integration with the User-ID XML API to identify users as they
authenticate to the wireless infrastructure.
● Proxies: Authentication prompted by a proxy server can be provided to User-ID via its XML
API by parsing the authentication log file for user and IP address information.
● Network access control (NAC): The XML API enables organizations to harvest user
information from NAC environments. As an example, a NAC solution provider could use the
User-ID XML API to populate user logins and logouts of its 802.1x solution. This integration
enables organizations to identify users as soon as they connect to the network and set
user-based enablement policies.
● Syslog listener: In environments with existing network services that authenticate users (for
example, wireless controllers, 802.1x, or NAC products), User-ID can monitor syslog messages
for user mapping. Extensible syslog filters control the parsing of syslog messages. Syslog
filters can be user-defined, but several predefined filters are available, including those for Blue
Coat proxy, wireless local-area networks (WLANs), and Pulse Policy Secure.
To enable organizations to specify security rules based on user groups and resolve the group
members automatically, User-ID integrates with directory servers by using a standards-based
protocol and a flexible configuration. After integration with the directory server is configured, the
firewall automatically retrieves user and user group information and keeps the information
updated to automatically adjust to changes in the user base or organization.
After User-ID gathers the user information, the next-generation firewall uses LDAP to obtain group
information for that user. Also, as in the case of user mapping, the XML API can serve as a
programmatic interface for a flexible group mapping ability. With group mapping, User-ID can
express security policies in terms of groups, enabling existing policies to update dynamically as
User-ID adds or removes users from groups.
User-ID gives you only half the view when associating IP addresses to specific users. Servers and
many other devices cannot utilize a user to identify their security access requirements. Dynamic
Address Groups (DAGs) enable you to create policies that automatically adapt to server additions,
moves, or deletions. They also enable the flexibility to apply security policy to the device based on its
role on the network.
Visibility into the application activity at a user level, not just at an IP address level, allows
organizations to more effectively enable the applications traversing the network. Administrators
can align application use with business unit requirements and, if appropriate, can choose to inform
the user that they are in violation of policy, or they can take the more direct approach of blocking
the user’s application use.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 121
Content identification
Content identification infuses next-generation firewalls with capabilities not possible in legacy,
port-based firewalls. Application identification eliminates threat vectors through the tight control of
all types of applications. This capability immediately reduces the attack surface of the network, after
which all allowed traffic is analyzed for exploits, malware, dangerous URLs, and dangerous or
restricted files or content. Content identification then goes beyond stopping known threats to
proactively identify and control unknown malware, which is often used as the leading edge of
sophisticated network attacks.
2.28.1 WildFire
As part of the next-generation firewall’s inline threat prevention capability, the firewall performs a
hash calculation for each unknown file, and the hash is submitted to WildFire. If any WildFire
subscriber has seen the file before, then the existing verdict for that file is immediately returned.
Links from inspected emails also are submitted to WildFire for analysis. Possible verdicts include:
If WildFire has never seen the file, the next-generation firewall is instructed to submit the file for
analysis. If the file size is under the configured size limit, the next-generation firewall securely
transmits the file to WildFire. Next-generation firewalls with an active WildFire license perform
scheduled auto-updates to their WildFire signatures, with update checks configured as often as
every minute.
WildFire leverages inline machine learning based malware and phishing prevention (real-time
WildFire verdict and anti-malware dynamic classification) to determine whether the corresponding
webpages for email links submitted to the service host any exploits, malware, or phishing
capabilities. The behaviors and properties of the website are taken into consideration when a verdict
on the link is made.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 122
To support dynamic malware analysis across the network at scale, WildFire is built on a cloud-based
architecture. Where regulatory or privacy requirements prevent the use of public cloud
infrastructure, a private cloud solution can be built in an on-premises data center.
Organizations can leverage either public cloud or private cloud deployments, and also can use both
within the same environment. The hybrid cloud capabilities of WildFire allow security teams more
file analysis flexibility because they can define which file types are sent to the WildFire public cloud
versus the on-premises appliance, or private cloud. The WildFire hybrid cloud capability enables
organizations to alleviate privacy or regulatory concerns by using the WildFire appliance for file
types containing sensitive data. Organizations also benefit from the comprehensive analysis and
global threat intelligence services of the WildFire public cloud for all others. AutoFocus is the
centerpiece of WildFire threat intelligence.
The product portfolio proactively blocks known threats, which provides baseline defenses against
known exploits, malware, malicious URLs, and C2 activity. When new threats emerge, the product
portfolio automatically routes suspicious files and URLs to WildFire for deep analysis.
WildFire inspects millions of samples per week from its global network of customers and threat
intelligence partners, looking for new forms of previously unknown malware, exploits, malicious
domains, and outbound C2 activity. The cloud-based service automatically creates new protections
that can block targeted and unknown malware, exploits, and outbound C2 activity by using
observations of their actual behavior, rather than relying on pre-existing signatures. The protections
are delivered globally in minutes. The result is a closed-loop, automated approach to preventing
cyberthreats that includes:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 123
2.28.2 URL Filtering
To complement the threat prevention and application control capabilities, a fully integrated, on-box
URL filtering database enables security teams to not only control end-user web surfing activities but
also to combine URL context with application and user rules. The URL Filtering service complements
App-ID by enabling you to configure the next-generation firewall to identify and control access to
websites and to protect your organization from websites that host malware and phishing pages. You
can use the URL category as a match criterion in policies, which permits exception-based behavior
and granular policy enforcement. For example, you can deny access to malware and hacking sites
for all users but allow access to users that belong to the IT security group.
When you enable URL Filtering, all web traffic is compared against the URL Filtering database,
PAN-DB, which contains millions of URLs that have been grouped into about 65 categories. The
malware and phishing URL categories in PAN-DB are updated in real time, which can prevent
subsequent attempts to access the site based on the URL category, instead of treating each attempt
as unknown. User-credential detection, a part of URL Filtering, allows you to alert on or block users
from submitting credentials to untrusted sites. If corporate credentials are compromised,
user-credential detection allows you to identify who submitted credentials so that you can
remediate.
The on-box URL database can be augmented to fit the traffic patterns of the local user community
with a custom URL database. For fast and easy access to frequently visited URLs, PAN-DB provides
high-performance local caching. This means URLs that are not categorized by the local URL
database can be pulled into cache from a hosted URL database. In addition to database
customization, administrators can create unique URL categories to further customize the URL
controls to fit their specific needs.
URL categorization can be combined with application and user classification to further target and
define policies. For example, SSL decryption can be invoked for select high-risk URL categories to
ensure that threats are exposed, and QoS controls can be applied to streaming media sites. URL
filtering visibility and policy controls can be bound to specific users through transparent integration
with enterprise directory services (such as Active Directory, LDAP, and eDirectory), with additional
insight provided through customizable reporting and logging.
Administrators can configure a custom block page to notify end users of any policy violations. The
page can include references to the username, the IP address, the URL they are attempting to
access, and the URL category. To place some of the web activity ownership back to the user,
administrators can allow users to continue to the website or webpage after being presented with a
warning page, or they can use passwords to override the URL Filtering policy.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 124
2.28.3 Threat Prevention
Threat Prevention blocks known malware, exploits, and C2 activity on the network. Addition of the
Threat Prevention subscription brings further capabilities to your next-generation firewall that
identify and prevent known threats hidden within allowed applications. The Threat Prevention
subscription includes malware/antivirus, C2, and vulnerability protection.
The Palo Alto Networks DNS Security service applies predictive analytics to disrupt attacks that use
DNS for C2 or data theft. Tight integration with Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls gives
you automated protection and eliminates the need for independent tools. Threats hidden in DNS
traffic are rapidly identified with shared threat intelligence and machine learning. Cloud-based
protections scale infinitely and are always up to date, thus giving your organization a critical new
control point to stop attacks that use DNS.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 125
DNS is a massive and often overlooked attack surface present in every organization. Adversaries take
advantage of the ubiquitous nature of DNS to abuse it at multiple points of an attack, including
reliable C2. Security teams struggle to understand new malicious domains and enforce consistent
protections for millions of emerging domains at the same time.
The DNS Security service takes a different approach to predicting and blocking malicious domains,
thus giving the advantage back to overwhelmed network defenders.
Next-generation firewalls protect you against tens of millions of malicious domains identified with
real-time analysis and continuously growing global threat intelligence. Your protection continues to
grow with data from a large, expanding threat intelligence-sharing community. The Palo Alto
Networks malicious domain database has been gathered over years, with sources including:
● WildFire malware prevention service to find new C2 domains, file download source domains,
and domains in malicious email links
● URL Filtering to continuously crawl newly found or uncategorized sites for threat indicators
● Passive DNS and device telemetry to understand domain resolution history seen from
thousands of deployed next-generation firewalls, generating petabytes of data per day
● Unit 42 threat research to provide human-driven adversary tracking and malware reverse
engineering, including insight from globally deployed honeypots
● More than 30 third-party sources of threat intelligence to enrich understanding
With the DNS Security service, your next-generation firewalls can predict and stop malicious
domains from domain generation algorithm-based malware with instant enforcement. Malware’s
use of domain generation algorithms (DGAs) continues to grow, limiting the effectiveness of
blocking known malicious domains alone. DGA malware uses a list of randomly generated domains
for C2, which can overwhelm the signature capability of traditional security approaches. DNS
Security handle DGA malware by using:
● Machine learning to detect new and never-before-seen DGA domains by analyzing DNS
queries as they are performed
● Easy-to-set policy for dynamic action to block DGA domains or sinkhole DNS queries
● Threat attribution and context to identify the malware family with machine learning for faster
investigation efforts
A cloud-based database scales infinitely to provide limitless protection against malicious domains.
Your protections are always up to date, whether 10,000 or 100 million new malicious domains are
created in a single day. As part of the cloud-based service, all DNS queries are checked against the
Palo Alto Networks infinitely scalable, cloud-based database in real time to determine appropriate
enforcement action. The DNS Security service removes one of the most effective and widely used
methods by which attackers establish C2, and its protection scales infinitely, ensuring your
next-generation firewalls can process new malicious domains before any harm is done.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 126
● Extend PAN-OS signature-based protection to identify advanced tunneling attempts. DNS
Security expands the native ability of next-generation firewalls to detect and prevent DNS
tunneling. Protections are scalable and evasion-resistant, thus covering known and unknown
variants of DNS tunneling.
● Rapidly neutralize DNS tunneling with automated policy action. DNS tunneling is
automatically stopped with the combination of easy-to-set policy actions on the
next-generation firewall and blockage of the parent domain for all customers.
The IoT Security solution works with next-generation firewalls to dynamically discover and maintain a
real-time inventory of the IoT devices on your network. Through AI and machine-learning algorithms,
the IoT Security solution achieves a high level of accuracy, even classifying IoT device types encountered
for the first time. And because it’s dynamic, your IoT device inventory is always up to date. IoT Security
also provides the automatic generation of policy recommendations to control IoT device traffic, as well
as the automatic creation of IoT device attributes for use in firewall policies.
2.28.6 SD-WAN
PAN-OS® SD-WAN from Palo Alto Networks lets you easily adopt an end-to-end SD-WAN architecture
with integrated, best-in-class security to deliver consistent, integrated security across branches, data
centers, and the cloud by leveraging the industry’s leading ML-powered NGFW to protect applications,
users, and devices against all threats. It provides optimized performance by gaining the flexibility to
leverage Prisma® Access hubs, data center hubs, or branches for application access. Customers can
now simplify branch onboarding using Prisma Access hubs and data centers together as the global
backbone; intelligently route traffic based on application performance with zero restrictions on
bandwidth availability; and centrally manage security and networking policies for data centers, hubs,
and branches to reduce operational complexity and cost while improving collaboration between
network and security operations center (NOC and SOC) teams.
It delivers consistent security across branches, data centers, and the cloud by leveraging the industry’s
leading ML-powered NGFW to protect applications, users, and devices against all threats while
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 127
delivering predictive performance. It embeds machine learning (ML) in the core of the firewall to
provide inline signatureless attack prevention for file-based attacks while identifying and immediately
stopping never-before-seen phishing attempts while, in turn, leveraging cloud-based ML processes to
push zero-delay signatures and instructions back to the NGFW. In addition, it uses behavioral analysis to
detect IoT devices and make policy recommendations as part of a cloud-delivered and natively
integrated service on the NGFW.
It improves the end user experience by gaining the flexibility to leverage Prisma Access hubs, data
center hubs, or branches for application access. In addition, it intelligently routes traffic based on
application performance, with no restriction on bandwidth availability, by measuring and monitoring
specific paths as well as dynamically moving sessions to the optimal path, guaranteeing the best
branch user experience. You can simply enable the subscription on your Next-Generation Firewalls and
begin intelligently, securely routing branch traffic to your cloud applications and between other sites.
Through a concept called “link tag,” the Firewall will automatically combine all service provider links
labeled with the same link to its own set of thresholds and path forwarding rules. With DIA AnyPath,
you can tailor exactly how an internet application fails over—either to another DIA internet path at the
same site or through a private VPN path to another location to get the better internet service. This
ensures that all mission-critical applications are performing at their best to provide the highest level of
usability.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 128
2.28.9 GlobalProtect
The GlobalProtect app provides a simple way to extend the enterprise security policies out to mobile
endpoints. As with other remote endpoints running the GlobalProtect app, the mobile app provides
secure access to your corporate network over an IPsec or SSL VPN tunnel. The app automatically
connects to the gateway that is closest to the end user’s current location. In addition, traffic to and from
the endpoint is automatically subject to the same security policy enforcement as other hosts on your
corporate network. The mobile app also collects information about the host configuration and can use
this information for enhanced HIP-based security policy enforcement.
There are two primary methods for installing the GlobalProtect app: You can deploy the app from your
third-party MDM and transparently push the app to your managed endpoints, or you can install the app
directly from the official store for your endpoint:
Starting with GlobalProtect app 5.0, the GlobalProtect app for Chrome OS is not supported; use the
GlobalProtect app for Android instead.
Data loss prevention (DLP) is a set of tools and processes that allow you to protect sensitive information
against unauthorized access, misuse, extraction, or sharing.
Enterprise DLP is a cloud-based service that uses supervised machine learning algorithms to sort
sensitive documents into Financial, Legal, Healthcare, and other categories for document classification,
which helps to guard against exposures, data loss, and data exfiltration. These patterns can identify the
sensitive information in traffic flowing through your network and protect them from exposure.
Enterprise DLP allows you to protect sensitive data in the following ways:
● Prevent file uploads and non-file based traffic from leaking to unsanctioned web
applications—Discover and conditionally stop sensitive data from being leaked to untrusted
web applications.
● Monitor uploads to sanctioned web applications—Discover and monitor sensitive data when it
is uploaded to sanctioned corporate applications.
Enterprise DLP is enabled through a cloud service to help you inspect content and analyze the data in
the correct context so that you can accurately identify sensitive data and secure it to prevent incidents.
Enterprise DLP supports over 380 data patterns and many predefined data filtering profiles. Enterprise
DLP is designed to automatically make new patterns and profiles available to you for use in Security
policy rules as soon as they are added to the cloud service.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 129
Use the following tools to configure Enterprise DLP:
● Data Patterns—Help you detect sensitive content and determine how that content is being
shared or accessed on your network.
Predefined data patterns and built-in settings make it easy for you to protect data that
contain certain properties (such as document title or author), credit card numbers, regulated
information from different countries (such as driver’s license numbers), and third-party DLP
labels. To improve detection rates for sensitive data in your organization, you can supplement
predefined data patterns by creating custom data patterns that are specific to your content
inspection and data protection requirements. In a custom data pattern, you can also define
regular expressions and data properties to look for metadata or attributes in the file’s custom
or extended properties and use it in a data filtering profile.
● Data Filtering Profiles—Power the data classification and monitor capabilities available on your
managed firewalls to prevent data loss and mitigate business risk.
Data filtering profiles are a collection of data patterns that are grouped together to scan for a
specific object or type of content. To perform content analysis, the predefined data filtering
profiles have data patterns that include industry-standard data identifiers, keywords, and
built-in logic in the form of machine learning, regular expressions, and checksums for legal
and financial data patterns. When you use the data filtering profile in a Security policy rule,
the firewall can inspect the traffic for a match and take action.
After you utilize the data patterns (either predefined or custom), you manage the data
filtering profiles from Panorama. You can use a predefined data filtering profile, or create a
new profile and add data patterns to it. Then, create security policies and apply the profiles
you added to the policies you create. For example, if a user uploads a file and data in the file
matches the criteria in the policies, the managed firewall either creates an alert notification or
blocks the file upload.
When traffic matches a data filtering profile that a security rule is using, a data filtering log is generated.
The log entry contains detailed information regarding the traffic that matches one or more data
patterns in the data filtering profile. The log details enable forensics by allowing you to verify when
matched data generated an alert notification or was blocked.
You can view the snippets in the Data Filtering logs. By default, data masking partially masks the
snippets to prevent the sensitive data from being exposed. You can completely mask the sensitive
information, unmask snippets, or disable snippet extraction and viewing entirely.
To improve detection accuracy and reduce false positives, you can also specify:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 130
You can also use more than one keyword in a keyword group and include or exclude keywords to
find when occurrences of specific words appear or do not appear within 200 characters of the
expression.
● Confidence levels—Along with proximity keywords, confidence levels allow you to specify the
probability of the occurrence of proximity keywords in a pattern match. With a Low confidence
the managed firewall does not use proximity keywords to identify a match; with a High
confidence the managed firewall looks for the proximity keywords within 200 characters of the
regular expressions in the pattern before it considers the data pattern in a file or non-file based
traffic to be a match.
● Basic and weighted regular expressions—A regular expression (regex for short) describes how
to search for a specific text pattern and then display the match occurrences when a pattern
match is found. There are two types of regular expressions—basic and weighted.
○ A basic regular expression searches for a specific text pattern. When a pattern match is
found, the service displays the match occurrences.
○ A weighted regular expression assigns a score to a text entry. When the score threshold is
exceeded, the service returns a match for the pattern.
To reduce false positives and maximize the search performance of your regular
expressions, you can assign scores using the weighted regular expression builder when
you create data patterns to find and calculate scores for the information that is important
to you. Scoring applies a match threshold, and when a score threshold is exceeded, such
as enough expressions from a pattern match an asset, the asset will be indicated as a
match for the pattern.
For more information, including a use case and best practices, see Configure Regular
Expressions in the Prisma SaaS Administrator’s Guide.
Key Idea
● Data filtering profiles are a collection of data patterns that are grouped
together to scan for a specific object or type of content.
SaaS Security Inline natively integrates with your NGFW, Panorama Managed Prisma Access, and Cloud
Managed Prisma Access to provide granular SaaS application visibility and control of unsanctioned SaaS
apps through advanced analytics, reporting, visualization, categorizations, and Security policy authoring
so that you can minimize data security risks to your organization. Employees already inadvertently use
SaaS apps that violate compliance agreements or that carry risks that exceed your organization’s
tolerance. SaaS Security Inline discovers such risks so that you can understand them and take action.
SaaS Security Inline provides easy deployment and inline policy enforcement. SaaS Security Inline
leverages ACE (App-ID Cloud Engine) technology and SaaS policy rule recommendations to provide
greater and faster SaaS app discovery and a seamless SaaS security workflow between your
organization’s administrators for improved security posture.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 131
SaaS Security Inline provides:
SaaS Security Inline complements SaaS Security API capabilities to provide an integrated CASB (Cloud
Access Security Broker) solution.
Virtual systems are separate, logical firewall instances within a single physical Palo Alto Networks
firewall. Rather than using multiple firewalls, managed service providers and enterprises can use a
single pair of firewalls (for high availability) and enable virtual systems on them. Each virtual system
(vsys) is an independent, separately-managed firewall with traffic kept separate from the traffic of other
virtual systems.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 132
2.28.13 References
● Mayan, Gilad David. “The IoT Rundown for 2020: Stats, Risks, and Solutions.” Security Today.
January 13, 2020, https://securitytoday.com/Articles/2020/01/13/The-IoT-Rundown-for-2020.
● Advanced threat prevention,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/threat-prevention/about-threat-pr
evention/advanced-threat-prevention
● PAN-OS SD-WAN,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/pan/public/downloadResource?pagePath=/content/pan
/en_US/resources/datasheets/pan-os-sd-wan
● SaaS security inline,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/saas-security/saas-security-admin/saas-security-inline/get-star
ted-with-saas-security-inline/whats-saas-security-inline
● Enterprise DLP,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/enterprise-dlp/enterprise-dlp-admin/enterprise-dlp-overview/
about-enterprise-data-loss-prevention
● GlobalProtect,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/globalprotect/10-1/globalprotect-admin/globalprotect-apps/d
eploy-the-globalprotect-app-software/download-and-install-the-globalprotect-mobile-app
● Advanced URL Filtering Subscription,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/url-filtering/enable-advanced-url-fi
ltering
● Virtual systems overview,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/10-2/pan-os-admin/virtual-systems/virtual-systems-ov
erview
● Activate Licenses and Subscriptions,
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/pan-os/8-1/pan-os-admin/getting-started/activate-licenses-an
d-subscriptions
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 133
2.29 Describe network security management
Three deployment mode options are available for Panorama, which (if necessary) allows for the
separation of management and log collection:
● Panorama mode: Panorama controls both policy and log management functions for all the
managed devices.
● Management only mode: Panorama manages configurations for the managed devices but
does not collect or manage logs.
● Log collector mode: One or more Log Collectors collect and manage logs from the managed
devices. This mode assumes that another deployment of Panorama is operating in
management only mode.
Figure:
Panorama deployment modes
The separation of management and log collection enables the Panorama deployment to meet
scalability, organizational, and geographical requirements. The choice of form factor and
deployment mode gives you the maximum flexibility for managing Palo Alto Networks
Next-Generation Firewalls in a distributed network.
Key Idea
○ Panorama mode
○ Management only mode
○ Log collector mode
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 134
2.29.2 Describe the three components of Best Practice Assessment (BPA)
The BPA consists of three parts: the assessment itself, a Security Policy Capability Adoption Heatmap,
and an executive summary.
The Best Practice Assessment is a focused evaluation of your adoption of security configuration best
practices for Next-Generation Firewalls or Panorama™ network security management, grouped by
policies, objects, networks, and devices.
The Security Policy Capability Adoption Heatmap shows gaps in your capability adoption, displaying
your current adoption percentage rating for each metric as well as a comparison against industry
averages. When receiving deep insight into how you are leveraging prevention capabilities, you can
continuously improve your security.
The BPA Executive Summary is designed for management and executives to better understand the
current state of security capability adoption at a glance—including information on progress from prior
reports, if available—to help your organization confidently progress toward best practice
implementation.
2.29.3 References
● ARPANET was the first packet-switched network created by the U.S. Defense Advanced
Research Project Agency (DARPA).
● Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is an example of a link-state routing protocol that is often used
in large enterprise networks.
● Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is an example of a path-vector protocol used between separate
autonomous systems.
● Two basic network topologies which are commonly used in LANs are star and mesh.
● An IP address can be represented with its subnet mask value, using “netbit” or CIDR notation.
● IPv4 is the most widely deployed version of IP consisting of a 32-bit logical IP address.
● A single Internet Key Exchange (IKE) security association is established between
communicating entities to initiate the IPsec VPN tunnel.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 135
● Data filtering profiles are a collection of data patterns that are grouped together to scan for a
specific object or type of content.
● The three deployment mode options available for Panorama are:
○ Panorama mode
○ Management only mode
○ Log collector mode
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 136
Domain 3: Cloud Technologies
3.1 Describe the NIST cloud service and deployment models
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines cloud computing in Special
Publication (SP) 800-145 as “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network
access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (such as networks, servers, storage,
applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management
effort or service provider interaction.”
The value of cloud computing is the ability to pool resources to achieve economies of scale and
agility. This ability is true for private or public clouds. Instead of requiring many independent and
often under-used servers deployed for your enterprise applications, pools of resources are
aggregated, consolidated, and designed to be elastic enough to scale with the needs of your
organization.
The move toward cloud computing not only brings cost and operational benefits but also
technology benefits. Data and applications are easily accessed by users regardless of where they
reside, projects can scale easily, and consumption can be tracked effectively. Virtualization is a critical
part of a cloud computing architecture that, when combined with software orchestration and
management tools, allows you to integrate disparate processes so that they can be automated,
easily replicated, and offered on an as-needed basis.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 137
Key Idea
● The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines cloud
computing in Special Publication (SP) 800-145 as “a model for enabling
ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of
configurable computing resources (such as networks, servers, storage,
applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with
minimal management effort or service provider interaction.”
● Public: A cloud infrastructure that is open to use by the general public. It is owned, managed,
and operated by a third party (or parties), and it exists on the cloud provider’s premises.
● Community: A cloud infrastructure that is used exclusively by a specific group of
organizations
● Private: A cloud infrastructure that is used exclusively by a single organization. It may be
owned, managed, and operated by the organization or a third party (or a combination of
both), and it may exist on-premises or off-premises.
● Hybrid: A cloud infrastructure that comprises two or more of the aforementioned
deployment models, bound by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and
application portability (for example, fail over to a secondary data center for disaster recovery
or content delivery networks across multiple clouds).
Open source components have become pervasive in modern software development, with the majority
of modern applications’ codebases made up of such packages. This method allows developers to move
quickly, since they don't need to re-create code that is already freely available and vetted by the
community. However, this process also comes with its own set of risks.
Before building container images with these components, developers need to be aware of security
concerns stemming from previously discovered vulnerabilities in the packages. They also need to
ensure they are meeting compliance requirements around software use licenses.
Community members frequently find and patch vulnerabilities, but the burden is on developers to
update their code. When a vulnerability is found, it’s only a matter of time before a public exploit is
made available, opening the door for even low-level attackers to take advantage of the issue.
Additionally, there are dozens of open source licenses with a variety of rules. For example, some require
attribution while others require the source code for the application that uses the component to also be
published. Keeping track of all of the licenses and their rules can be difficult.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 138
3.2.2 Describe cloud security responsibilities
The security risks that threaten your network today do not change when you move to the cloud. The
shared responsibility model defines who (customer and/or provider) is responsible for what (related
to security) in the public cloud.
In general terms, the cloud provider is responsible for security of the cloud, including the physical
security of the cloud data centers, and foundational networking, storage, compute, and virtualization
services. The cloud customer is responsible for security in the cloud, which is further delineated by
the cloud service model (see Figure 3-1).
For example, in an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) model, the cloud customer is responsible for the
security of the operating systems, middleware, runtime, applications, and data. In a
platform-as-a-service (PaaS) model, the cloud customer is responsible for the security of the
applications and data, and the cloud provider is responsible for the security of the operating systems,
middleware, and runtime. In a SaaS model, the cloud customer is responsible only for the security of
the data, and the cloud provider is responsible for the full stack from the physical security of the
cloud data centers to the application. Multitenancy in cloud environments, particularly in SaaS
models, means that customer controls and resources are necessarily limited by the cloud provider.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 139
With the use of cloud computing technologies, your data center environment can evolve from a fixed
environment where applications run on dedicated servers toward an environment that is dynamic and
automated, where pools of computing resources are available to support application workloads that
can be accessed anywhere, anytime, from any device.
Security remains a significant challenge when you adopt this new dynamic, cloud-computing fabric
environment. Many of the principles that make cloud computing attractive are counter to network
security best practices:
● Cloud computing doesn’t mitigate existing network security risks. The security risks that
threaten your network today do not change when you move to the cloud. The shared
responsibility model defines who (customer and/or provider) is responsible for what (related to
security) in the public cloud. In general terms, the cloud provider is responsible for security of the
cloud, including the physical security of the cloud data centers and foundational networking,
storage, compute, and virtualization services. The cloud customer is responsible for security in
the cloud, which is further delineated by the cloud service model. For example, in an
infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) model, the cloud customer is responsible for the security of the
operating systems, middleware, runtime, applications, and data. In a platform-as-a-service
(PaaS) model, the cloud customer is responsible for the security of the applications and data,
and the cloud provider is responsible for the security of the operating systems, middleware, and
runtime. In a SaaS model, the cloud customer is responsible only for the security of the data, and
the cloud provider is responsible for the full stack, from the physical security of the cloud data
centers to the application.
● Security requires isolation and segmentation; the cloud relies on shared resources. Security
best practices dictate that mission-critical applications and data be isolated in secure segments
on the network using the Zero Trust principle of “never trust, always verify.” On a physical
network, Zero Trust is relatively straightforward to accomplish using firewalls and policies based
on application and user identity. In a cloud computing environment, direct communication
between VMs within a server and in the data center (east-west traffic) occurs constantly, in some
cases across varied levels of trust, thus making segmentation a difficult task. Mixed levels of
trust, when combined with a lack of intra-host traffic visibility by virtualized port-based security
offerings, may weaken an organization’s security posture.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 140
● Multitenancy is a key characteristic of the public cloud, and an important risk. Although
public cloud providers strive to ensure isolation between their various customers, the
infrastructure and resources in the public cloud are shared. Inherent risks in a shared
environment include misconfigurations, inadequate or ineffective processes and controls, and
the “noisy neighbor” problem (excessive network traffic, disk I/O, or processor use can negatively
impact other customers sharing the same resource). In hybrid and multicloud environments
that connect numerous public and/or private clouds, the delineation becomes blurred,
complexity increases, and security risks become more challenging to address.
● Traditional network and host security models don’t work in the cloud for serverless
applications. Defense in depth mostly has been performed through Network layer controls.
Advanced threat prevention tools can recognize the applications that traverse the network and
determine whether they should be allowed. This type of security still is very much required in
cloud native environments, but is no longer sufficient on its own. Public cloud providers offer a
rich portfolio of services, and the only way to govern and secure many of them is through
Identity and Access Management (IAM). IAM controls the permissions and access for users and
cloud resources. IAM policies are sets of permission policies that can be attached to either users
or cloud resources to authorize what they access and what they can do with what they access.
Key Terms
● Consistent security in physical and virtualized form factors: The same levels of application
control and threat prevention should be used to protect both your cloud computing
environment and your physical network. First, you need to be able to confirm the identity of
your applications, validating their identity and forcing them to use only their standard ports.
You also need to be able to block the use of rogue applications while simultaneously looking
for and blocking misconfigured applications. Finally, application-specific threat prevention
policies should be applied to block both known and unknown malware from moving into and
across your network and cloud environment.
● Your business applications segmented using Zero Trust principles: To fully maximize the
use of computing resources, a relatively common current practice is to mix application
workload trust levels on the same compute resource. Although mixed levels of trust are
efficient in practice, they introduce security risks in the event of a compromise. Your cloud
security solution needs to be able to implement security policies based on the concept of
Zero Trust as a means of controlling traffic between workloads while preventing lateral
movement of threats.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 141
● Centrally managed business applications; streamlined policy updates: Physical network
security still is deployed in almost every organization, so the ability to manage both hardware
and virtual form factor deployments from a centralized location using the same
management infrastructure and interface is critical. To ensure that security keeps pace with
the speed of change that your workflows may exhibit, your security solution should include
features that will allow you to reduce, and in some cases eliminate, the manual processes
that security policy updates often require.
Regardless of which type of cloud service you use, the burden of securing certain types of workloads
will always fall on you instead of your vendor. To maximize your cloud environment security, consider
the following best practices:
● Review default settings: Although certain settings are automatically set by the provider,
some must be manually activated. You should have your own set of security policies rather
than assume that the vendor is handling a particular aspect of your cloud native security.
● Adapt data storage and authentication configurations to your organization: All locations
where data will be uploaded should be password protected. Password expiration policies also
should be carefully selected to meet the needs of your organization.
● Don’t assume your cloud data is safe: Never assume that vendor-encrypted data is totally
safe. Some vendors provide encryption services before upload, and some do not. Whichever
the case, make sure to encrypt your data in transit and at rest by using your own keys.
● Integrate with your cloud’s data retention policy: You must understand your vendor’s data
retention and deletion policy. You must have multiple copies of your data and a fixed data
retention period. But what happens when you delete data from the cloud? Is it still accessible
to the vendor? Are there other places where it might have been cached or copied? You
should verify these issues before you set up a new cloud environment.
● Set appropriate privileges: Appropriate settings for privilege levels are helpful for making
your cloud environment more secure. When you use role-based access controls (RBACs) for
authorization, you can ensure that every person who views or works with your data has
access only to the things that are absolutely necessary.
● Keep cloud software up to date: Your vendor may provide infrastructure and, in some cases,
a prebuilt software environment or cloud native firewall. But anything that you add is your
responsibility to secure. Thus, you as a user are responsible for ensuring that your security
patches, operating systems, and so on, are up to date. The simplest way to prevent technical
debt and backlogs is to automate the updates.
● Build security policies and best practices into your cloud images: If you leave your cloud
native security to different developers on your DevOps security team, the result could be
policy discrepancies. A good way to combat this effect is to create cloud images with security
tools configured and policies applied so that developers can simply create instances of them.
● Isolate your cloud resources: To reduce the risk of hackers gaining complete control of your
system, you should separate admin accounts for development, deployment, testing, and so
on.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 142
Key Terms
● Technical debt is a software development concept, which has also been applied more
generally to IT, in which additional future costs are anticipated for rework due to an
earlier decision or course of action that was necessary for agility but was not necessarily
the most optimal or appropriate decision or course of action.
Prisma Access tenants get their own dedicated Prisma Access instances. They are not shared between
tenants.
Cloud security, or cloud computing security, consists of various technologies and tools designed to
protect each aspect of the Shared Responsibility Model. Although cloud users aren't responsible for the
security of the underlying infrastructure, they are responsible for protecting their information from
theft, data leakage, and deletion. Many security approaches in the cloud are the same as those of
traditional IT security, but there are some fundamental differences. Whether you implement public,
private, or hybrid cloud environments, it’s important to adopt security controls that facilitate frictionless
deployment and don't hinder the dynamic, agile nature for which cloud environments are renowned.
Public Cloud
The public cloud is a cloud computing model in which IT services are delivered via the public internet.
In this case, the entire underlying infrastructure is completely owned and operated by a third-party
cloud provider, such as Google Cloud, Amazon or Microsoft. Public cloud deployments are often used to
provide common services like web-based applications or storage, but they can also be used for complex
computations or to test and develop new services. These environments are generally billed via annual
or use-based subscriptions based on the number of cloud resources used and traffic processed. Within
a public cloud environment, you share the foundational infrastructure with other organizations, and you
can access your services as well as deploy and manage your resources through your account. The public
cloud yields many potential advantages for businesses, including the ability to deploy highly scalable,
globally available applications quickly and without costly upfront investments.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 143
Private Cloud
In a private cloud, infrastructure is provisioned for exclusive use by a single business or organization. It
can be owned, managed and operated by the business, a third-party service provider, or a combination
of the two. It can also be located on the business’s premises or off, similar to the public cloud. Any
application can be run in a private cloud environment, including websites, big data and machine
learning applications, and databases. The private cloud offers many of the same benefits as the public
cloud, such as elastic scalability and cost savings, but it also guarantees resource availability, total
control, privacy, and regulatory compliance. This makes private clouds highly desirable to organizations
with strict compliance requirements or that demand absolute control over their data location, such as
government agencies or financial institutions.
Hybrid Cloud
A hybrid cloud is a combination of on-premises, private, and/or public cloud environments that remain
separate yet orchestrated. In a hybrid cloud environment, data and applications can move between
environments, enabling greater flexibility – especially for organizations looking to extend their existing
on-premises footprints with specific use cases ideally suited for the cloud. As an example, public clouds
can be used for high-volume, lower-security needs, such as web-based applications, while private
clouds can be used for more sensitive, business-critical operations like financial reporting. Often
referred to as the best of both worlds, its adaptability makes it attractive for many enterprises.
3.2.5 Describe identity and access management controls for cloud resources
Identity and Access Management (IAM) provides authentication, authorization, and access control
functions. IAM tools provide control for the provisioning, maintenance, and operation of user
identities and the level of access to network, data center, and cloud resources that different
identities are permitted.
Prisma Cloud IAM Security helps you address the security challenges of managing IAM in cloud
environments. Prisma Cloud IAM Security capabilities automatically calculate effective permissions
across cloud service providers, detect overly permissive access, and suggest corrections to reach least
privilege entitlements. It includes out-of-the-box policies that govern IAM best practices to help you
identify risky permissions and achieve the ideal set of privileges for your deployment.
Because Prisma Cloud can correlate identity information with configuration data, it gives you the depth
of visibility and control. For example, if you use the AWS S3 storage service, the Prisma Cloud Data
Security module can discover and identify sensitive data, the CSPM capability can calculate true
internet exposure, and the CIEM capability can provide granular insights into exactly who has access to
the data and make appropriate recommendations to enforce least-privilege access.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 144
3.2.6 Describe different types of cloud security alerts and notifications
Prisma Cloud continually monitors all of your cloud environments to detect misconfigurations (such as
exposed cloud storage instances), advanced network threats (such as cryptojacking and data
exfiltration), potentially compromised accounts (such as stolen access keys), and vulnerable hosts.
Prisma Cloud then correlates configuration data with user behavior and network traffic to provide
context around misconfigurations and threats in the form of actionable alerts.
Although Prisma Cloud begins monitoring and correlating data as soon as you onboard the cloud
account, there are tasks you need to perform before you view alerts generated by policy violations in
your cloud environments. The first task to Enable Prisma Cloud Alerts is to add the cloud account to an
account group during onboarding. Next, create an alert rule that associates all of the cloud accounts in
an account group with the set of policies for which you want Prisma Cloud to generate alerts. You can
view the alerts for all of your cloud environments directly from Prisma Cloud and drill down into each to
view specific policy violations. If you have internal networks that you want to exclude from being
flagged in an alert, you can add Trusted IP Addresses on Prisma Cloud.
From the Alerts Overview page, you can see the alert coverage, based on percentage as well as severity,
and also drill down based on policies. You can easily access the policy that triggered the alert, and view
the details on the resources and the policy recommendations in separate tabs.
In addition, Prisma Cloud provides out-of-box ability to Configure External Integrations on Prisma Cloud
with third-party technologies, such as SIEM platforms, ticketing systems, messaging systems, and
automation frameworks so that you can continue using your existing operational, escalation, and
notification tools. To monitor your cloud infrastructures more efficiently and provide visibility into
actionable events across all your cloud workloads, you can also:
● Generate Reports on Prisma Cloud Alerts on-demand or scheduled reports on open alerts.
● Send the Alert Payload to a third-party tool.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 145
3.2.7 Reference
Application development methodologies are moving away from the traditional “waterfall” model
toward more agile continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) processes with end-to-end
automation. This new approach brings a multitude of benefits, such as shorter time to market and
faster delivery, but it also introduces security challenges because traditional security methodologies
weren’t designed to address these modern application workflows. As developer teams embrace
cloud native technologies, security teams find themselves scrambling to keep pace. Limited
prevention controls, poor visibility, and tools that lack automation yield incomplete security analytics;
all of these things increase the risk of compromise and the likelihood of successful breaches in cloud
environments. Meanwhile, the demand for an entirely new approach to security emerges: cloud
Native Security Platforms (CNSPs).
The term “cloud native” refers to an approach to building and running applications that takes full
advantage of a cloud computing delivery model instead of an on-premises data center. This
approach takes the best of what cloud has to offer (scalability, deployability, manageability, and
limitless on-demand compute power) and applies these principles to software development,
combined with CI/CD automation, to radically increase productivity, business agility, and cost
savings.
Cloud native architectures consist of cloud services such as containers, serverless security, platform
as a service (PaaS), and microservices. These services are loosely coupled, meaning they are not
hardwired to any infrastructure components, thus allowing developers to make changes frequently
and without affecting other pieces of the application or other team members’ projects, across all
technology boundaries such as public, private, and multicloud deployments.
“Cloud native” refers to a methodology of software development that essentially is designed for
cloud delivery and exemplifies all the benefits of the cloud by nature.
As more organizations have adopted DevOps, developer teams have begun to update their
application development pipelines, security teams quickly realized their tools were not well-suited
for the developer-driven, API-centric, infrastructure-agnostic patterns of cloud native security. As a
result, cloud native security point products began to appear on the market. These products were
each engineered to address one part of the problem or one segment of the software stack, but on
their own they could not collect enough information to accurately understand or report on the risks
across cloud native environments. This situation forced security teams to juggle multiple tools and
vendors, which increased cost, complexity, and risk, in addition to creating blind spots where the
tools overlapped but didn’t integrate.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 146
The solution to this problem requires a unified platform approach that can envelop the entire CI/CD
lifecycle and integrate with the DevOps workflow. Just as cloud native approaches have
fundamentally changed how cloud is used, CNSPs are fundamentally restructuring how the cloud is
secured.
CNSPs share context about infrastructure, PaaS, users, development platforms, data, and application
workloads across platform components to enhance security. They also:
In the past, organizations that wanted to embrace new compute options were stifled by the need to
buy more security products to support those options. Stitching together disparate solutions in an
attempt to enforce consistent policies across technology boundaries became more of a problem than a
solution. CNSPs, however, provide coverage across the continuum of compute options, multicloud, and
the application development lifecycle. This coverage allows organizations to choose the correct
compute options for any given workload, thus granting them freedom without worry over how to
integrate solutions for security. CNSPs epitomize the benefits of a cloud native strategy, enabling agility,
flexibility, and digital transformation.
The Palo Alto Networks CNSP includes the following solutions to secure the cloud: Prisma Cloud,
Prisma Access, and Prisma SaaS.
Prisma Cloud is the most comprehensive cloud native security platform, designed to protect all
aspects of cloud use with the industry’s leading technology. Prisma Cloud provides broad security
and compliance coverage for the entire cloud native technology stack and applications and data
throughout the entire application lifecycle, across multicloud and hybrid cloud environments.
Prisma Cloud takes an integrated approach that enables SecOps and DevOps teams to accelerate
cloud native application deployment by implementing security early in the development cycle.
● Visibility, governance, and compliance. Gain deep visibility into the security posture of
multicloud environments. Track everything that gets deployed with an automated asset
inventory, and maintain compliance with out-of-the-box governance policies that enforce
good behavior across your environments.
● Compute security. Secure hosts, containers, and serverless workloads throughout the
application lifecycle. Detect and prevent risks by integrating vulnerability intelligence into
your integrated development environment (IDE), software configuration management
(SCM), and CI/CD workflows. Enforce machine learning-based runtime protection to protect
applications and workloads in real time.
● Network protection. Continuously monitor network activity for anomalous behavior, enforce
microservice-aware micro-segmentation, and implement industry-leading firewall
protection. Protect the network perimeter and the connectivity between containers and
hosts.
● Identity security. Monitor and leverage user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) across
your environments to detect and block malicious actions. Gain visibility into and enforce
governance policies on user activities, and manage the permissions of both users and
workloads.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 147
Key Terms
Despite the availability of numerous tools, most organizations struggle to effectively control their
data exposure and enforce security policies across ever-changing cloud environments and SaaS
applications. Furthermore, ensuring compliance where data is stored across distributed
environments puts a significant burden on your already strained security teams.
Compute security
The cloud native landscape is constantly evolving with new technologies and levels of abstraction.
Hosts, containers, and serverless workloads provide unique benefits and have different security
requirements. Prisma Cloud provides best-in-class solutions for securing any type of cloud native
workload throughout the development lifecycle.
Prisma Cloud provides cloud native computing security from build to run, including:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 148
Key Idea
● Integrate security into your IDE, SCM, and CI workflows to detect and
prevent issues as early as possible.
Key Terms
Network protection
Network protection must be adapted for cloud native environments while still enforcing consistent
policies across hybrid environments. Prisma Cloud detects and prevents network anomalies by
enforcing container-level micro-segmentation, inspecting traffic flow logs, and leveraging advanced
Layer 7 threat protection.
● Network visibility and anomaly detection: Ingest network traffic flow logs from multiple
sources and gain deep visibility into network behavior to detect and prevent anomalies.
● Identity-based micro-segmentation: Enforce cloud native micro-segmentation at the
container and host levels with Layer 4 and Layer 7 distributed firewalls. Segment cloud
networks and deploy policies based on logical workload and application identities, rather
than dynamic IP addresses.
● Cloud native firewalling: Automatically model traffic flows between microservices and
dynamically create filters that allow valid connections and drop suspicious ones. Protect
networks with Layer 4 and Layer 7 security capabilities, such as DNS security and URL
filtering.
Identity security
Management of a large number of privileged users with access to an ever-expanding set of
sensitive resources can be challenging. Cloud resources themselves also have permission sets that
must be managed. Prisma Cloud helps you leverage the identity of cloud resources to enforce
security policies and ensure secure user behavior across your cloud environments.
● Identity and Access Management (IAM) security: Secure and manage the relationships
between users and cloud resources. Enforce governance policies to ensure that users and
resources behave only as intended and do not introduce risk to the environment.
● Access management: Ensure least-privileged access to cloud resources and infrastructure
and decouple user permissions from workload permissions.
● Machine identity: Decouple workload identity from IP addresses. Leverage tags and
metadata to assign a logical identity to applications and workloads, then use it to enforce
ID-based micro-segmentation and security policies that adapt to your dynamic
environments.
● UEBA: Continuously analyze the behavior of users and resources in your cloud to detect and
prevent anomalous behavior, such as an admin logging in from an unknown location or a
container accessing a file it should not be able to access.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 149
3.4 Describe the purpose of virtualization in cloud computing
A hypervisor allows multiple, virtual (“guest”) operating systems to run concurrently on a single physical
host computer. The hypervisor functions between the computer operating system and the hardware
kernel. The two types of hypervisors are:
● Type 1 (native or bare metal). Runs directly on the host computer’s hardware
● Type 2 (hosted). Runs within an operating system environment
Key Terms
As data center managers face a burgeoning population of mobile users, the distributed workforce –
with multiple endpoints and cloud applications – is forcing organizations to evolve both their in-house
and cloud cybersecurity infrastructures. The traditional approach of backhauling traffic to the corporate
network or using multiple point products to extend security to remote networks and mobile users
proves difficult to manage, costly, and prone to introducing inconsistencies in security policies and
protections.
When hundreds or thousands of devices must be delivered, deployed and maintained across all remote
locations, the result is too often a limited security solution with a heavy footprint and gaps in security
that expose organizations to breaches and cyberattacks. The topic is further complicated by various
environments in cloud computing and storage, including public, private, and hybrid cloud adoption
scenarios, each of which pose unique opportunities, challenges, and risks.
Virtual systems provide the same basic functions as a physical firewall, along with additional benefits:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 150
● Reduced capital and operational expenses—Virtual systems eliminate the need to have
multiple physical firewalls at one location because virtual systems co-exist on one firewall. By not
having to purchase multiple firewalls, an organization can save on the hardware expense,
electric bills, and rack space, and can reduce maintenance and management expenses.
● Ability to share IP-address-to-username mappings—By assigning a virtual system as a User-ID
hub, you can share the IP-address-to-username mappings across virtual systems to leverage the
full User-ID capacity of the firewall and reduce operational complexity.
Virtualization is an important technology used in data centers and cloud computing to optimize
resources. Important security considerations associated with virtualization include:
● Dormant virtual machines (VMs): In many data center and cloud environments, inactive
VMs are routinely (often automatically) shut down when they are not in use. VMs that are
shut down for extended periods (weeks or months) may be inadvertently missed when
anti-malware updates and security patches are applied.
● Hypervisor vulnerabilities: In addition to vulnerabilities within the hosted applications, VMs,
and other resources in a virtual environment, the hypervisor itself may be vulnerable, which
can expose hosted resources to attack.
● Intra-VM communications: Network traffic between virtual hosts, particularly on a single
physical server, may not traverse a physical switch. This lack of visibility increases
troubleshooting complexity and can increase security risks because of inadequate
monitoring and logging capabilities.
● VM sprawl: Virtual environments can grow quickly, thus resulting in a breakdown in change
management processes and exacerbating security issues, such as dormant VMs, hypervisor
vulnerabilities, and intra-VM communications.
3.4.5 Reference
● Cloud Security Service, Cloud Storage and Cloud Technology – Palo Alto Networks,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/cloud-security-service-cloud-storage-and-cloud-t
echnology
Containers
Containers deliver all three cloud native system characteristics and provide a balanced set of
capabilities and trade-offs across the continuum. Containers were popularized and are best known
by the Docker project. They have existed in various forms for many years and have their roots in
technologies such as Solaris Zones and BSD Jails. Although Docker is a well-known brand, other
vendors are adopting Docker’s underlying technologies of runc and containerd to create similar but
separate solutions.
Containers balance separation (though not as well as VMs), excellent compatibility with existing
apps, and a high degree of operational control with good density potential and easy integration into
software development flows. Containers can be complex to operate, primarily due to their broad
configurability and the wide variety of choices they present to operational teams. Depending on
these choices, containers can be either completely stateless, dynamic, and isolated; highly
intermingled with the host operating system and stateful; or anywhere in between. This degree of
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 151
choice is both the greatest strength and the great weakness of containers. In response, the market
has created systems to their right on the continuum (as seen in the following figure), such as
serverless, to both make them easier to manage at scale and abstract some of their complexity by
reducing some configurability.
Virtual machines
Although a discussion of VMs in the context of cloud native may be surprising, the reality is that the
vast majority of the world’s workloads today run “directly” (non-containerized) in VMs. Most
organizations do not see VMs as a legacy platform to eliminate, nor simply as a dumb host on which
to run containers. Rather, they acknowledge that many of their apps have not yet been
containerized and that the traditional VM still is a critical deployment model for them. Although a
VM not hosting containers doesn’t meet all three attributes of a cloud native system, it nevertheless
can be operated dynamically and run microservices.
VMs provide the greatest levels of isolation, compatibility, and control in the continuum (see the
following figure) and are suitable for running nearly any type of workload. Examples of VM
technologies include VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, and the instances provided by virtually
every IaaS cloud provider, such as Amazon EC2. VMs are differentiated from “thin VMs” to their right
on the continuum because they often are operated in a stateful manner with little separation
between OS, app, and data.
Figure: VMs and thin VMs on the continuum of cloud native technologies
Key Idea
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 152
3.5.2 Describe Container as a Service
Containers as a Service
As containers grew in popularity and used diversified orchestrators such as Kubernetes (and its
derivatives, such as OpenShift), Mesos, and Docker Swarm, it became increasingly important to
deploy and operate containers at scale. Although these orchestrators abstract much of the
complexity required to deploy and operate large numbers of microservices composed of many
containers and running across many hosts, they can be complex to set up and maintain. These
orchestrators also are focused on the container runtime and do little to assist with the deployment
and management of underlying hosts. Although sophisticated organizations often use technologies
such as thin VMs wrapped in automation tooling to address the deployment and management of
underlying hosts, even these approaches do not fully unburden the organization from managing the
underlying compute, storage, and network hardware. Containers-as-a-service (CaaS) platforms
provide all three cloud native characteristics by default and, although assembled from many more
generic components, are highly optimized for container workloads.
Because major public cloud IaaS providers already have extensive investments in lower-level
automation and deployment, many have chosen to leverage this advantage to build complete
platforms for running containers that strive to eliminate management of the underlying hardware
and VMs from users. These CaaS platforms include Google Kubernetes Engine, Azure Kubernetes
Service, and Amazon EC2 Container Service. These solutions combine the container deployment and
management capabilities of an orchestrator with their own platform-specific APIs to create and
manage VMs. This integration allows users to more easily provision capacity without the need to
manage the underlying hardware or virtualization layer. Some of these platforms, such as Google
Kubernetes Engine, even use thin VMs running container-focused operating systems, such as
Container-Optimized OS or CoreOS, to further reduce the need to manage the host operating
system.
CaaS platforms are differentiated from containers on their left on the continuum (see Figure below) by
providing a more comprehensive set of capabilities that abstract the complexities involved with
hardware and VM provisioning. CaaS platforms are differentiated from the on-demand containers to
their right on the continuum by typically still enabling users to directly manage the underlying VMs and
host OS. For example, in most CaaS deployments, users can use SSH directly to a node and run arbitrary
tools as a root user to aid in diagnostics or customize the host OS.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 153
3.5.3 Differentiate a hypervisor from a Docker Container
Hypervisor
In the virtualized deployment, there is hardware, an operating system, a hypervisor that abstracts each
virtual machine from the base OS, and (guest) virtual machines that have full operating systems
installed in them with their respective libraries and applications.
Docker Container
Containers allow Dev teams to package apps and services in a standard and simple way. Containers can
run anywhere and be moved easily. Docker containers are the most common.
Docker is a tool used by developers to package together dependencies into a single container (or
image). What this means is that in order to use your integration, you are not required to "pip install" all
of the packages required. They are part of a container that "docks" to the server and contains all the
libraries you need. To learn more about docker, visit their site here.
Docker primarily runs python scripts and integrations in a controlled environment. Python scripts and
integrations run isolated from the server to prevent someone from accidentally damaging the server.
Packaging libraries and dependencies together prevents unknown issues from occurring because the
environment is all the same.
3.5.4 Reference
● Docker.
https://xsoar.pan.dev/docs/integrations/docker
Although on-demand containers greatly reduce the “surface area” exposed to end users, and thus,
the complexity associated with managing them, some users prefer an even simpler way to deploy
apps. Serverless is a class of technologies designed to allow developers to provide only their app
code to a service, which then automatically instantiates the rest of the stack below it.
In serverless apps, the developer uploads only the app package itself, without a full container image
or any OS components. The platform dynamically packages it into an image, runs the image in a
container, and then (if needed) instantiates the underlying host OS and VM and the hardware
required to run them. In a serverless model, users make the most dramatic trade-offs of
compatibility and control for the simplest, most efficient deployment and management experience.
Examples of serverless environments include Amazon Lambda and Azure Functions. Many PaaS
offerings, such as Pivotal Cloud Foundry, also are effectively serverless even if they have not
historically been marketed as such. Although serverless may appear to lack the container-specific,
cloud native attribute, containers are extensively used in the underlying implementations, even if
those implementations are not exposed to end users directly.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 154
Serverless is differentiated from on-demand containers to the left side on the continuum by the
complete inability to interact with the underlying host and container runtime, often to the extent of not
even having visibility into the software it runs.
In a traditional software development model, developers write large amounts of code for new features,
products, bug fixes, and such, and then pass their work to the Operations team for deployment, usually
via an automated ticketing system. The Operations team receives this request in its queue, tests the
code, and gets it ready for production. This process can take days, weeks, or months. Under this
traditional model, if Operations runs into any problems during deployment, the team sends a ticket
back to the developers to tell them what to fix. Eventually, after this back-and-forth interaction is
resolved, the workload gets pushed into production.
This model makes software delivery a lengthy and fragmented process. Developers often see
Operations as a roadblock, slowing down their project timelines, and Operations teams feel like a
repository for development problems.
DevOps solves these problems by uniting Development and Operations teams throughout the entire
software delivery process, enabling them to discover and remediate issues earlier, automate testing and
deployment, and reduce time to market.
To better understand what DevOps is, let’s first understand what DevOps is not.
DevOps is not:
● A combination of the Dev and Ops teams: There still are two teams, but they operate in a more
communicative, collaborative way.
● Its own separate team: There is no such thing as a “DevOps engineer.” Although some
companies may appoint a “DevOps team” as a pilot when trying to transition to a DevOps
culture, DevOps refers to a culture where developers, testers, and operations personnel
cooperate throughout the entire software delivery lifecycle.
● A tool or set of tools: Although there are tools that work well with a DevOps model or help
promote DevOps culture, DevOps ultimately is a strategy, not a tool.
● Automation: Although automation is very important for a DevOps culture, it alone does not
define DevOps.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 155
Now, let’s discuss what DevOps is. Instead of developers coding huge feature sets before blindly
handing them over to Operations for deployment., in a DevOps model, developers frequently deliver
small amounts of code for continuous testing. Instead of communicating issues and requests through a
ticketing system, the Development and Operations teams meet regularly, share analytics, and co-own
projects from beginning to end.
Key Idea
● In the DevOps model, developers frequently deliver small amounts of code for
continuous testing.
One problem in DevOps is that security often is neglected. Developers move quickly and their
workflows are automated. Security is a separate team, and developers don’t want to slow down for
security checks and requests. As a result, many developers deploy without going through the proper
security channels and inevitably make harmful security mistakes.
To solve the DevOps efficiency problem, organizations are adopting DevSecOps. DevSecOps takes the
concept behind DevOps that developers and IT teams should work together closely, instead of
separately, throughout software delivery and extends it to include security and integrate automated
checks into the full CI/CD pipeline. The integration of the CI/CD pipeline takes care of the problem of
security seeming like an outside force and instead allows developers to maintain their usual speed
without compromising data security.
CI/CD pipeline
DevOps is a cycle of continuous integration and continuous delivery (or continuous deployment),
otherwise known as the CI/CD pipeline. The CI/CD pipeline integrates Development and Operations
teams to improve productivity by automating infrastructure and workflows and continuously
measuring application performance.
Continuous integration requires developers to integrate code into a repository several times per day
for automated testing. Each check-in is verified by an automated build, thus allowing teams to
detect problems early.
Continuous delivery means that the CI pipeline is automated, but the code must go through
manual technical checks before it is implemented in production.
Continuous deployment takes continuous delivery one step further. Instead of manual checks, the
code passes automated testing and is automatically deployed, thus giving customers instant access
to new features.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 156
3.10 Explain governance and compliance related to deployment of SaaS applications
To prevent successful attacks, cloud resources and SaaS applications must be correctly configured
and adhere to your organization’s security standards from day one. Also, these applications, and the
data they collect and store, must be properly protected and compliant to avoid costly fines, brand
reputation damage, and loss of customer trust. Security teams must meet security standards and
maintain compliant environments at scale and across SaaS applications.
Despite the availability of numerous tools, most organizations struggle to effectively control their
data exposure and enforce security policies across ever-changing cloud environments and SaaS
applications. Furthermore, ensuring compliance where data is stored across distributed
environments puts a significant burden on constrained security teams.
Ensuring governance and compliance across multi-cloud environments and SaaS applications
requires:
● Real-time discovery and classification of resources and data across dynamic SaaS and PaaS
and IaaS environments
● Configuration governance, ensuring application and resource configurations match your
security best practices as soon as they are deployed. This also prevents configuration drift
● Access governance using granular policy definitions to govern access to SaaS applications
and resources in the public cloud and to apply network segmentation
● Compliance auditing by leveraging automation and built-in compliance frameworks to
ensure compliance at any time and generate audit-ready reports on demand
● Seamless user experience that doesn’t force additional steps or introduce significant latency
in the use of applications as you add new security tools
Key Idea
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 157
3.10.2 Describe privacy regulations globally
ATTRIBUTE DESCRIPTION
Data Ownership Based on the SaaS app’s terms and conditions, one of the
following values displays:
● Customer Ownership–Your organization has full rights
over the data when using the service. For example, the
terms and conditions might state, “as between the
parties, user owns all intellectual property rights in user
data and user applications.”
● Vendor Ownership—Your organization grants the
service access to use the data. For example, the terms
and conditions might state, “You acknowledge and
agree that any questions, comments, suggestions,
ideas, feedback, or other information regarding the Site
(“Submissions”) provided by you to us are
non-confidential and shall become our sole property”
● Unknown—Attribute for the SaaS app is under research.
IP Based Restriction IP-based restriction is the ability to restrict login access to the
SaaS application for specific IP addresses. Based on the SaaS
application’s capabilities, one of the following values displays:
● —SaaS application offers the ability to configure IP
based restriction.
● No—SaaS application does not offer IP based
restriction.
● Unknown—Attribute for the SaaS app is under research.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 158
3.10.3 Describe security compliance between local policies and SaaS Applications
Ensuring that your cloud resources and SaaS applications are correctly configured and adhere to
your organization’s security standards from day one is essential to prevent successful attacks. Also,
making sure that these applications, and the data they collect and store, are properly protected and
compliant is critical to avoid costly fines, a tarnished image, and loss of customer trust. Meeting
security standards and maintaining compliant environments at scale, and across SaaS applications,
is the new expectation for security teams.
Despite the availability of numerous tools, most organizations struggle to effectively control their
data exposure and enforce security policies across ever-changing cloud environments and SaaS
applications. Furthermore, ensuring compliance where data is stored across distributed
environments puts a significant burden on your already strained security teams.
Ensuring governance and compliance across multicloud environments and SaaS applications
requires:
● Real-time discovery and classification of resources and data across dynamic SaaS, PaaS, and
IaaS environments
● Configuration governance, ensuring that application and resource configurations match
your security best practices as soon as they are deployed and also preventing configuration
drift
● Access governance, by using granular policy definitions to govern access to SaaS
applications and resources in the public cloud and to apply network segmentation
● Compliance auditing that leverages automation and built-in compliance frameworks to
ensure compliance at any time and generate audit-ready reports on demand
● Seamless user experience that doesn’t force additional steps or introduce significant latency
in the use of applications as you add new security tools
Data center architectures and requirements can differ significantly. For example, a data center built
for a cloud service provider like Amazon satisfies facility, infrastructure, and security requirements
that significantly differ from a completely private data center, such as one built for a government
facility that is dedicated to securing classified data.
● Facility – the usable space available for IT equipment. Providing round-the-clock access to
information makes data centers some of the world’s most energy-consuming facilities. There
should be an emphasis on designs that optimize space and environmental control to keep
equipment within specific temperature/humidity ranges.
● Core components – equipment and software for IT operations and storage of data and
applications. These may include storage systems; servers; network infrastructure, such as
switches and routers; and various information security elements, such as firewalls.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 159
● Support infrastructure – equipment contributing to securely sustaining the highest
availability possible. The Uptime Institute has defined four tiers of data centers, with
availability ranging from 99.671% to 99.995%. Some components for supporting infrastructure
include:
● Uninterruptible Power Sources (UPS) – battery banks, generators, and redundant power
sources.
● Environmental control – computer room air conditioners (CRAC); heating, ventilation and air
conditioning (HVAC) systems; and exhaust systems.
● Physical security systems – biometrics and video surveillance systems.
● Operations staff – personnel available to monitor operations and maintain IT and
infrastructure equipment around the clock.
3.11.1 References
● What is a Data Center? https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-a-data-center
3.12 Differentiate between data-center security weaknesses of traditional solutions versus cloud
environments
Traditional data center security solutions exhibit the same weaknesses found when they are
deployed at a perimeter gateway on the physical network: They make their initial positive control
network access decisions based on port, using stateful inspection, and then they make a series of
sequential, negative control decisions using installed feature sets. This approach has several
problems:
● Limited visibility and control: The “ports first” focus of traditional data security solutions
limits the ability to see all traffic on all ports, which means that evasive or encrypted
applications, and any corresponding threats that may or may not use standard ports, can
evade detection. For example, many data center applications (such as Microsoft Lync, Active
Directory, and SharePoint) use a wide range of contiguous ports to function properly. You
therefore must open all those ports first, which then exposes those same ports to other
applications or cyberthreats.
● No concept of unknown traffic: Unknown traffic is high risk but represents only a relatively
small amount of traffic on every network. Unknown traffic can be a custom application, an
unidentified commercial off-the-shelf application, or a threat. The common practice of
blocking all unknown traffic may cripple your business. Allowing all traffic is highly risky. You
need to be able to systematically manage unknown traffic using native policy management
tools to reduce your organizational security risks.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 160
● Cumbersome security policy update process. Existing security solutions in the data center
do not address the dynamic nature of your cloud environment, because your policies have
difficulty contending with the numerous dynamic changes that are common in virtual data
centers. In a virtual data center, VM application servers often move from one physical host to
another, so your security policies must adapt to changing network conditions.
Many cloud security offerings are merely virtualized versions of port and protocol based security
appliances with the same inadequacies as their physical counterparts.
In a virtual data center (private cloud), there are two different types of traffic, each of which is
secured in a different manner (see Figure below):
● North-south refers to data packets that move in and out of the virtualized environment from
the host network or a corresponding traditional data center.
● East-west refers to data packets moving between virtual workloads entirely within the
private cloud.
The compute cluster is the building block for hosting the application infrastructure and provides
the necessary resources in terms of compute, storage, networking, and security. Compute clusters
can be interconnected using OSI model Layer 2 (Data Link) or Layer 3 (Network) technologies, such
as virtual LAN (VLAN), virtual extensible LAN (VXLAN), or Internet Protocol (IP), thus providing a
domain extension for workload capacity. Innovations in the virtualization space allow VMs to move
freely in this private cloud while preserving compute, storage, networking, and security
characteristics and postures.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 161
Organizations usually implement security to protect traffic flowing north-south, but this approach
is insufficient for protecting east-west traffic within a private cloud. To improve their security
posture, enterprises must protect against threats across the entire network, both north-south and
east-west.
One common practice in a private cloud is to isolate VMs into different tiers. Isolation provides clear
delineation of application functions and allows a security team to easily implement security
policies. Isolation is achieved using logical network attributes (such as a VLAN or a VXLAN) or logical
software constructs (such as security groups). The figure here displays a simple three-tier
application composed of a WEB-VM as the frontend, an APP-VM as the application, and a DB-VM
providing database services.
An attacker has multiple options to steal data from the DB-VM. The first option is to initiate an SQL
injection attack by sending HTTP requests containing normalized SQL commands that target an
application vulnerability. The second option is to compromise the WEB-VM (using vulnerability
exploits) and then move laterally to the APP-VM, initiating a brute-force attack to retrieve the SQL
admin password.
After the DB-VM is compromised, the attacker can hide sensitive data extraction by using
techniques such as DNS tunneling or by moving data across the network with NetBIOS and then
off the network via FTP. In fact, attackers using applications commonly found on nearly every
network have virtually unlimited options for stealing critical data in this environment. Infiltration
into the environment and exfiltration of critical data can be completely transparent and undetected
because the data is carried over the same legitimate protocols (such as HTTP and DNS) used for
normal business activities.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 162
Virtual data center security best practices dictate a combination of north-south and east-west
protection. East-west protection provides the following benefits:
● Authorizes only allowed applications to flow inside the data center, between VMs
● Reduces lateral threat movement when a front-end workload has been compromised (the
attacker breaches the front-end server by using a misconfigured application or unpatched
exploit)
● Stops known and unknown threats that are sourced internally within the data center
● Protects against data theft by leveraging data and file filtering capability and blocking
anti-spyware communications to the external world
An added benefit of using virtual firewalls for east-west protection is the unprecedented traffic and
threat visibility that the virtualized security device can now provide. After traffic logs and threat logs
are turned on, VM-to-VM communications and malicious attacks become visible. This virtual data
center awareness allows security teams to optimize policies and enforce cyberthreat protection (for
example, IPS, anti-malware, file blocking, data filtering, and DoS protection) where needed.
The following approach to security in the evolving data center from traditional three-tier
architectures to virtual data centers and to the cloud aligns with practical realities, such as the need
to leverage existing best practices and technology investments and the likelihood that most
organizations will transform their data centers incrementally.
● Consolidating servers within trust levels: Organizations often consolidate servers within the
same trust level into a single virtual computing environment, composed of either one
physical host or a cluster of physical hosts. Intra-host communications generally are minimal
and inconsequential. Most traffic routinely is directed “off box” to users and systems residing
at different trust levels. When intra-host communications do happen, the absence of
protective safeguards between these virtualized systems also is consistent with the
organization’s security posture for non-virtualized systems. Live migration features typically
are used to enable transfer of VMs only to hosts supporting workloads within the same
subnet. Security solutions should incorporate a robust virtual systems capability in which a
single instance of the associated countermeasures can be partitioned into multiple logical
instances, each with its own policy, management, and event domains. This virtual systems
capability enables a single physical device to be used to simultaneously meet the unique
requirements of multiple VMs or groups of VMs. Control and protection of inter-host traffic
with physical network security appliances that are properly positioned and configured is the
primary security focus.
● Consolidating servers across trust levels: Workloads with different trust levels often coexist
on the same physical host or cluster of physical hosts. Intra-host communications are limited,
and live migration features are used to enable transfer of VMs only to hosts that are on the
same subnet and that are configured identically with regard to routing of VM-to-VM traffic.
Intra-host communication paths intentionally are not configured between VMs with different
trust levels. Instead, all traffic is forced off box through a default gateway, such as a physical
network security appliance, before it is allowed to proceed to the destination VM. This off-box
routing typically can be accomplished by configuring separate virtual switches with separate
physical network interface cards (NICs) for the VMs at each distinct trust level. As a best
practice for virtualization, you should minimize the combination of workloads with different
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 163
trust levels on the same server. Live migrations of VMs also should be restricted to servers
supporting workloads within the same trust levels and within the same subnet. Over time,
and in particular as workloads move to the cloud, maintenance of segmentation based on
trust levels becomes more challenging.
3.15 Describe how data centers can transform their operations incrementally
Organizations recognize the imperative to rapidly change their datacenter operations and technologies,
centering approaches that don’t impede the necessary transformations but can still protect an
organization’s most critical assets effectively. In order to maintain compliance and operational
efficiency, security must scale and adapt at the same pace as the rest of the digital transformation
journey. New application architectures and core technologies, such as containers and software-defined
networks, strain traditional security techniques. As a result, embracing new forms of infrastructure is a
key part of digitization as enterprises look to cloud providers for scale outside of their existing footprints
in order to build hybrid environments. Datacenter networks and the security capabilities that the
networks can wield need to provide the ability to enable those cloudy extensions in ways that allow
organizations to grow efficiently while maintaining effective security controls. Key architectural
decisions can be made today to pave the way for the future.
For more information refer to:
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/research/security-in-datacenter-transformation
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 164
3.16 Describe the cloud-native security platform
Application development methodologies are moving away from the traditional “waterfall” model
and toward more agile continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) processes with
end-to-end automation. This new approach brings a multitude of benefits, such as shorter time to
market and faster delivery, but also introduces security challenges because traditional security
methodologies weren’t designed to address these modern application workflows. As developer
teams embrace cloud native technologies, security teams find themselves scrambling to keep pace.
Limited prevention controls, poor visibility, and tools that lack automation yield incomplete security
analytics; all of these things increase the risk of compromise and the likelihood of successful
breaches in cloud environments. Meanwhile, the demand for an entirely new approach to security
emerges: cloud Native Security Platforms (CNSPs).
The term “cloud native” refers to an approach to building and running applications that take full
advantage of a cloud computing delivery model instead of an on-premises data center. This
approach combines the best of what cloud offers (scalability, deployability, manageability, and
limitless on-demand compute power) and applies these principles to software development,
combined with CI/CD automation, to radically increase productivity, business agility, and cost
savings.
Cloud native architectures consist of cloud services such as containers, serverless security, platform
as a service (PaaS), and microservices. These services are loosely coupled, meaning they are not
hardwired to any infrastructure components, which allows developers to make changes frequently
all across technology boundaries such as public, private, and multicloud deployments without
affecting other pieces of the application or other team members’ projects.
“Cloud native” refers to a methodology of software development essentially designed for cloud
delivery, one that exemplifies all the benefits of the cloud by nature.
As more organizations have adopted DevOps and developer teams have begun to update their
application development pipelines, security teams quickly realized their tools did not suffice for the
developer-driven, API-centric, infrastructure-agnostic patterns of cloud native security. As a result,
cloud native security point products began to appear on the market. These products were each
engineered to address one part of the problem or one segment of the software stack, but on their
own could not collect enough information to accurately understand or report on the risks across
cloud native environments. This situation forced security teams to juggle multiple tools and vendors,
which increased cost, complexity, and risk in addition to creating blind spots where the tools
overlapped but didn’t integrate.
Key Idea
The solution to this problem requires a unified platform approach that can envelop the entire CI/CD
lifecycle and integrate with the DevOps workflow. Just as cloud native approaches have
fundamentally changed how organizations utilize the cloud, CNSPs are fundamentally restructuring
how to secure the cloud.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 165
CNSPs share context about infrastructure, PaaS, users, development platforms, data, and application
workloads across platform components to enhance security. CNSPs also:
The Palo Alto Networks CNSP includes the following solutions to secure the cloud: Prisma Cloud,
Prisma Access, and Prisma SaaS.
Prisma Cloud is the most comprehensive cloud native security platform, designed to protect all
aspects of cloud use with the industry’s leading technology. Prisma Cloud provides broad security
and compliance coverage for the entire cloud native technology stack as well as applications and
data throughout the entire application lifecycle across multicloud and hybrid cloud environments.
Prisma Cloud takes an integrated approach that enables SecOps and DevOps teams to accelerate
cloud native application deployment by implementing security early in the development cycle.
● Visibility, governance, and compliance. Gain deep visibility into the security posture of
multicloud environments. Track all deployments with an automated asset inventory and
maintain compliance with out-of-the-box governance policies that enforce good behavior
across your environments.
● Compute security. Secure hosts, containers, and serverless workloads throughout the
application lifecycle. Detect and prevent risks by integrating vulnerability intelligence into
your integrated development environment (IDE), software configuration management
(SCM), and CI/CD workflows. Enforce machine learning-based runtime protection to protect
applications and workloads in real time.
● Network protection. Continuously monitor network activity for anomalous behavior, enforce
microservice-aware micro-segmentation, and implement industry-leading firewall
protection. Protect the network perimeter and the connectivity between containers and
hosts.
● Identity security. Monitor and leverage user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) across
your environments to detect and block malicious actions. Gain visibility into and enforce
governance policies on user activities and manage the permissions of both users and
workloads.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 166
Key Terms
With increasing numbers of mobile users, branch offices, data, and services located outside the
protections of traditional network security appliances, organizations are struggling to keep pace and
ensure the security, privacy, and integrity of their networks and their customers’ data.
Many of the technologies on the market are built on architectures not designed to handle all types
of traffic and security threats. This forces organizations to adopt multiple point products to handle
different requirements, such as secure web gateways, firewalls, secure VPN remote access, and
SD-WAN. For every product there is an architecture to deploy, a set of policies to configure, and an
interface to manage, each with its own set of logs. This situation creates an administrative burden
that introduces cost, complexity, and gaps in security posture.
To address these challenges, Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) has emerged. By design, SASE
(pronounced “sassy”) helps organizations adopt cloud and mobility by providing network and
network security services from a common cloud-delivered architecture. A SASE solution must
provide consistent security services and access to all types of cloud applications (public cloud,
private cloud, and SaaS) delivered through a common framework. Organizations can remove
multiple point products and adopt a single cloud-delivered SASE solution to reduce complexity
while saving significant technical, human, and financial resources.
A SASE solution converges networking and security services into one unified, cloud-delivered
solution (see Figure 3-12) that includes the following:
● Networking
○ Software-defined wide-area networks (SD-WANs)
○ Virtual private networks (VPNs)
○ Zero Trust network access (ZTNA)
○ Quality of Service (QoS)
● Security
○ Firewall as a service (FWaaS)
○ Domain Name System (DNS) security
○ Threat prevention
○ Secure web gateway (SWG)
○ Data loss prevention (DLP)
○ Cloud access security broker (CASB)
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 167
Key Terms
Figure: SASE: advanced network and security capabilities in a converged, cloud-delivered solution
Prisma Access delivers globally distributed networking and security to all your users and
applications. Whether your users work at branch offices or home offices, they connect to Prisma
Access to safely access cloud and data center applications and the internet.
Prisma Access consistently protects all traffic, on all ports and from all applications, thus enabling
your organization to:
● Prevent successful cyberattacks with proven security philosophies and threat intelligence
for deep visibility and precise control that extends across your organization
● Fully inspect all application traffic bidirectionally, including SSL/TLS-encrypted traffic, on all
ports, whether communicating with the internet, with the cloud, or between branches
● Benefit from comprehensive threat intelligence powered by automated threat data from
Palo Alto Networks and hundreds of third-party feeds
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 168
3.19 Describe the SASE layer
Network-as-a-service layer
The network-as-a-service layer in Prisma Access delivers important SASE capabilities, including:
● Software-defined wide-area network (SD-WAN)
● Virtual private network (VPN)
● Zero Trust network access (ZTNA)
● Quality of service (QoS)
SD-WAN
Companies are adopting software-defined wide-area networks (SD-WAN) to connect branch offices
to the corporate network and provide local internet breakout as an alternative to costly multiprotocol
label switching (MPLS) connections. The challenge with SD-WAN, however, is how to combine
security with the SD-WAN fabric, which leads to the need for multiple overlays.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 169
In a SASE solution, SD-WAN edge devices can connect to a cloud-based infrastructure rather than to
physical SD-WAN hubs located in data center or colocation facilities. This approach enables the
interconnectivity between branch offices without the complexity of deploying and managing
physical SD-WAN hubs.
You already should consider or have adopted SD-WAN into your organization’s network
infrastructure as a way to securely connect and control access to branch offices and remote
employees. SASE creates a unified framework for SD-WAN services and other solutions to connect to,
thus providing a single point of view and simplified management solution to protect your network.
Prisma Access connects branch offices over a standard IPsec VPN tunnel using common
IPsec-compatible devices, such as your existing branch router, SD-WAN edge device, or a third-party
firewall. It uses Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) or static routes for routing from the branch and
equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing for faster performance and better redundancy across multiple
links.
A SASE solution encompasses VPN services and enhances the capabilities to operate in a
cloud-based infrastructure to securely route traffic to the public cloud, SaaS, internet, or
private-cloud apps. In an IPsec VPN example, you can create a site-to-site connection to a
cloud-based infrastructure from any IPsec-compatible device located at a branch or retail location
via a branch router, wireless access point, SD-WAN edge device, or firewall. Mobile users employ an
always-on IPsec or SSL VPN connection between their endpoint or mobile device, and a SASE
solution ensures consistent traffic encryption and threat prevention.
Regardless of which type of VPN service you use in your organization, a SASE solution provides a
unified cloud infrastructure to connect to, instead of requiring you to backhaul to a VPN gateway at
corporate headquarters. This solution dramatically simplifies the management and policy control
needed to enforce least-privileged access rules.
Prisma Access (formerly GlobalProtect cloud service) provides cloud-delivered security infrastructure
that enables your organization to connect users to a nearby cloud gateway, enable secure access to
all applications, and maintain full visibility and inspection of traffic across all ports and protocols.
● Users with managed devices have the GlobalProtect app installed on their laptop, mobile
phone, or tablet. The GlobalProtect app connects to Prisma Access automatically whenever
internet access is available, without requiring any user interaction.
● Users can access all of their applications, whether in the cloud or the data center. The
connectivity layer connects applications in different locations, thus enabling secure access
(based on App-ID and User-ID policies) to public cloud, SaaS, and data center applications.
● Prisma Access delivers protection through the security service layer, such as protections
against known and unknown malware, exploits, C2 traffic, and credential-based attacks.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 170
For unmanaged/BYOD devices:
● Your organization can deploy Prisma Access in conjunction with mobile device management
(MDM) integration to support bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policies. The integration enables
capabilities such as per-app VPN.
● Users such as contractors and employees with BYOD devices with unmanaged devices can
access applications without an app installed by using Prisma Access with Clientless VPN.
● Clientless VPN also enables secure access to SaaS applications from unmanaged devices with
inline protections by using Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) proxy integration.
This functionality works in conjunction with Prisma SaaS.
Many ZTNA products are based on software-defined perimeter (SDP) architectures, which do not
provide content inspection, thus creating a discrepancy in the types of protection available for each
application. For consistent protection, the organization must build additional controls on top of the
ZTNA model and establish inspection for all traffic across all applications.
SASE builds on the ZTNA key principles and applies them across all the other services within a SASE
solution. SASE identifies users, devices, and applications, regardless of where they connect from,
thus simplifying policy creation and management. SASE removes the complexity of connecting to a
gateway by incorporating the networking services into a single unified cloud infrastructure.
Key Idea
● Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is an important part of the Zero Trust
philosophy of “never trust, always verify” developed by Forrester.
A SASE solution should incorporate ZTNA concepts for protecting applications and apply other
security services to consistently enforce DLP and threat prevention policies. Access controls establish
who a person is, but other security controls are also necessary to make sure that the person’s
behaviors and actions are not harmful to the organization. The same controls need to be applied
across access to all applications.
Quality of Service
Organizations that transition from MPLS to SD-WAN using broadband services are finding that the
service quality varies. Quality of Service (QoS) establishes bandwidth allocation assigned to particular
apps and services. Businesses rely on QoS to ensure that their critical apps and services perform
adequately (for example, medical equipment or credit card processing services). If these systems
were to slow down due to lack of bandwidth, business operations and sales would be severely
impacted. QoS prioritizes business-critical apps, based on a ranking system, so you can choose
which apps and services take precedence over others.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 171
QoS is an important step when you begin migrating from MPLS. A SASE solution incorporates QoS
services in the cloud, thus allowing you to easily mark sensitive applications (such as VoIP) as higher
priority than general internet browsing and entertainment apps.
QoS is immensely important for businesses of any size. Management of QoS traffic and allocation
doesn’t need to be difficult. SASE enables you to dynamically shape traffic based on the policies that
prioritize critical application requirements. Make sure that your SASE solution contains QoS
capabilities.
Security-as-a-service layer
The security-as-a-service layer in Prisma Access delivers important SASE capabilities, including:
● DNS security
● Firewall as a service (FWaaS)
● Threat prevention
● Secure web gateway (SWG)
● Data loss prevention (DLP)
● Cloud access security broker (CASB)
DNS security
Every organization uses DNS to translate a domain name into an IP address. DNS is an open service,
and by default it cannot detect DNS-based threats. As a result, malicious activity within DNS can be
used to propagate an attack.
DNS security protects your users by predicting and blocking malicious domains while neutralizing
threats. A SASE solution adopts DNS security features by providing consistent security across the
network and users, regardless of their location.
Your SASE solution should contain DNS protections delivered within the cloud environment as part
of the network access. DNS security should be built into the solution that your branch offices and
mobile users use to connect to the internet. The DNS security provided in your SASE solution should
leverage a combination of predictive analytics, machine learning, and automation to combat threats
in DNS traffic.
Prisma Access delivers the Palo Alto Networks DNS Security service, which provides a combination of
predictive analytics, machine learning, and automation to combat threats in DNS traffic.
Organizations can block known malicious domains, predict new malicious domains, and stop DNS
tunneling.
Firewall as a service
Firewall as a service (FWaaS) is a deployment method for delivering a firewall as a cloud-based
service. FWaaS possesses the same features as a next-generation firewall, but is implemented in the
cloud. Organizations that move the firewall to the cloud can benefit from cost savings by eliminating
the need to install or maintain security hardware at branch and retail locations.
A SASE solution incorporates FWaaS into its unified platform. Organizations that include the FWaaS
service model within a SASE framework can easily manage their deployments from a single
platform.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 172
A SASE solution should enable FWaaS capabilities to provide the protection of a next-generation
firewall by implementing Network Security policy in the cloud. You must ensure that your SASE
solution does not provide only basic port blocking or minimal firewall protections. You need the
same features that a next-generation firewall embodies and the features that cloud-based security
offers, such as threat prevention services and DNS security.
Prisma Access provides FWaaS, which protects branch offices from threats while providing the
security services expected from a next-generation firewall. The full spectrum of FWaaS includes
threat prevention, URL filtering, and sandboxing.
Threat prevention
In today’s world of small- and large-scale breaches, where ransomware attacks occur daily, threat
prevention is important for protecting your organization’s data and employees. A variety of threat
prevention tools are available, from anti-malware and intrusion prevention to SSL decryption and file
blocking, thus providing organizations ways to block threats. However, these point products require
separate solutions, thus making management and integration difficult.
Within a SASE solution, a single cloud platform integrates all these point products and services. This
integration provides simplified management and oversight of all threats and vulnerabilities across
your network and cloud environments.
You need the latest threat intelligence to stop exploits and malware in order to protect your data.
Your SASE solution should incorporate threat prevention tools into its framework so you can react
quickly and swiftly to remediate threats. Be sure to check the quality of threat intelligence that is
being provided by the vendor. The vendor should gather and share data from various sources,
including customers, other vendors, and other related industry leaders, to provide continuous
protection from unknown threats.
The use of Prisma Access for threat prevention combines the proven technologies in the Palo Alto
Networks platform with global sources of threat intelligence and automation to stop previously
known or unknown attacks.
SWG is one of the many security services that a SASE solution must provide. As organizations grow
and add ever greater numbers of remote users, coverage and protection become more difficult. A
SASE solution moves SWG into the cloud, thus providing protection in the cloud through a unified
platform for complete visibility and control over the entire network.
A SASE solution includes the same security services in an SWG, allowing organizations to control
access to the web and enforce security policies that protect users from hostile websites. Other
security services such as FWaaS, DNS security, threat prevention, DLP, and CASB also should be
included.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 173
Prisma Access for SWG functionality is designed to maintain visibility into all types of traffic while
stopping evasions that can mask threats. The Palo Alto Networks web filtering capabilities also drive
its credential theft prevention technology, which can stop corporate credentials from being sent to
previously unknown sites.
Through the SASE approach, DLP becomes one cloud-delivered solution centralized around the data
itself, everywhere. The same policies are consistently applied to sensitive data, whether at rest, in
motion, or in use, and regardless of its location. In the SASE architecture, DLP is no longer a
standalone solution anymore, but embedded in the organization’s existing control points, thus
eliminating the need to deploy and maintain multiple tools. With SASE, organizations can finally
enable a comprehensive data protection solution that relies on a scalable and simple architecture
and allows effective machine learning by leveraging access to global traffic.
DLP is a necessary tool to protect sensitive data and ensure compliance throughout the
organizations. Consequently, the SASE solution must include this core capability. With SASE, DLP is
an embedded, cloud-delivered service used to accurately and consistently identify, monitor, and
protect sensitive data everywhere across networks, clouds, and users.
Prisma Access combines integration with DLP controls that are API-driven (through Prisma SaaS)
and inline (through Prisma Access). These DLP policies allow organizations to categorize data and
establish policies that prevent data loss.
CASB should be another security feature within your SASE solution, creating a single platform for
stakeholders to manage security controls. A SASE solution helps you understand which SaaS apps
are being used and where data is going, regardless of where users are located.
Your SASE solution should incorporate both inline and API-based SaaS controls for governance,
access controls, and data protection. The combination of inline and API-based CASB capabilities is
called a multimode CASB and provides superior visibility, management, security, and zero-day
protection against emerging threats.
Prisma Access and Prisma SaaS implement security controls that combine inline security API
security and contextual controls, acting as a CASB to determine access to sensitive information.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 174
These controls are implemented in an integrated manner and applied throughout all cloud
application policies.
Key Idea
Sanctioned SaaS applications provide business benefits and are fast to deploy, require minimal
cost, and are infinitely scalable. Tolerated SaaS applications fulfill a legitimate business need, but
certain use restrictions may be necessary to reduce risk. Unsanctioned SaaS applications either
clearly provide no business benefits or the security risks of the application outweigh the business
benefits. For example, an unsanctioned SaaS application may violate regulatory compliance
mandates, create an unacceptable risk of loss of corporate intellectual property or other sensitive
data, or enable malware distribution.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 175
SaaS threat prevention
WildFire threat cloud integration with Prisma SaaS provides cyberthreat prevention to block known
malware and to identify and block unknown malware. This integration extends the existing
integration of WildFire to prevent threats from spreading through the sanctioned SaaS applications,
which in turn prevents a new insertion point for malware. When new malware is discovered by
Prisma SaaS, the threat information is shared with the rest of the product portfolio, even if it is not
deployed inline with the SaaS applications.
Prisma SaaS provides complete visibility across all user, folder, and file activity, which provides
detailed analysis that helps you transition from a position of speculation to one of exact knowledge
regarding occurrences within the SaaS environment at any given point. Because you can view deep
analytics into day-to-day use, you can quickly pinpoint any data risks or compliance-related policy
violations. This detailed analysis of user and data activity allows for granular data governance and
forensics.
Prisma SaaS connects directly to the applications themselves, therefore providing continuous silent
monitoring of the risks within the sanctioned SaaS applications, with detailed visibility that is not
possible with traditional security solutions.
Prisma SaaS prevents data exposure in unstructured (hosted files) and structured (application
entries such as Salesforce.com) data. Both data types are a common source of improper data shares.
Retroactive policy
A traditional network security solution can see only inline data and apply security policies to data
accessed inline, after the policy is created. This approach doesn’t effectively prevent SaaS data
exposure, however, because SaaS data may have been shared long before the policy was created.
This data may not be accessed inline for many months or years, thus potentially leaving sensitive
data exposed indefinitely to malware infection and unauthorized access.
Prisma SaaS retroactively applies security policies to all users and data from the beginning of the
SaaS account’s creation, rather than the policy’s creation, to identify any potential vulnerabilities or
policy violations. Prisma SaaS does not wait for someone to access the data inline to apply policies
and resolve any vulnerabilities or violations; SaaS data and shares are proactively discovered,
protected, and resolved, regardless of when they were created.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 176
Policies are context-driven to allow for granular definitions of data exposure risks. This granularity is
necessary to enable SaaS use while still preventing accidental data exposure. Policies take several
factors in context to create an overall data exposure risk profile. One or two factors may not provide
enough insight into the potential risk of the share. The overall risk of exposure is determined only
after reaching a comprehensive understanding of the full context of the share.
Risks are calculated by user type, document type, sensitive data contained, how the data is shared,
and whether malware is present. This capability provides the ability to control the exposure at a
granular level based on several important factors. For example, a financial team may be able to share
financial data with other people on its team, but not beyond that. Even though the original share is
allowed, the team cannot share data that is infected with malware. The financial team may, however,
be allowed to share non-sensitive data company-wide or, in some cases, with external vendors. The
key to enabling this level of granularity is the ability to look at the share in the context of all the
factors.
To control sanctioned SaaS use, an enterprise security solution must provide the following:
● Threat prevention: SaaS applications introduce new threat risks that need to be understood
and controlled. Many SaaS applications automatically sync files with users, and users often
share data in SaaS applications with third parties that are out of an organization’s control.
These two aspects of SaaS environments create a new insertion point for malware that not
only can get in from external shares but also can automatically sync those infected files
across the organization without any user intervention. To address SaaS-based malware
threats, a security solution must be able to prevent known and unknown malware from
residing in sanctioned SaaS applications, regardless of the source.
● Visibility and data exposure control: After sanctioned SaaS use is defined and controlled
with a granular policy, data residing in those SaaS applications no longer is visible to the
organization’s perimeter firewalls. This loss of visibility creates a blind spot for IT. Additional
data exposure controls are needed to specifically address the unique risks associated with
SaaS environments, with a focus on data protection. Visibility of data stored and used in SaaS
applications is critical to ensuring a deep understanding of users, the data they have shared,
and how they have shared it.
● Risk prevention, not just risk response: An organization’s users commonly use certain SaaS
applications long before the organization officially sanctions those applications. Even after a
SaaS application is sanctioned, data often is shared with third parties that don’t necessarily
have next-generation security solutions to effectively safeguard SaaS data from malware
threats and data exposure risks. Threat prevention and data exposure control in a SaaS-based
environment require visibility and control not just from the time that a SaaS application is
sanctioned going forward. You need visibility and control of all your data, including data that
was being stored and shared before the SaaS application was sanctioned.
Data residing within enterprise-enabled SaaS applications is not visible to an organization’s network
perimeter. Prisma SaaS connects directly to sanctioned SaaS applications to provide data classification,
sharing/permission visibility, and threat detection within the application. This capability yields
unparalleled visibility, which allows organizations to inspect content for data exposure violations and
control access to shared data via a contextual policy.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 177
Prisma SaaS builds on the existing SaaS visibility and granular control capabilities of the product
portfolio provided through App-ID, with detailed SaaS-based reporting and granular control of SaaS
use. The figure below shows an example of the granular controls for SaaS applications supported by
App-ID.
The network-as-a-service layer in Prisma Access delivers important SASE capabilities, including:
Cloud Managed Prisma Access – using the Prisma Access app – gives you a simplified way to interact
with and manage Prisma Access. In the Prisma Access app, you'll find what you need to manage your
Prisma Access with the Prisma Access app. If you're using Panorama to manage Prisma Access, visit
here instead.
Prisma Access helps you deliver consistent security to your remote networks and mobile users. All your
users – at headquarters, office branches, and on the road – connect to Prisma Access to safely use the
internet and cloud and data center applications. You get protection at scale with global coverage, so
you don’t have to worry about things like sizing and deploying firewalls at your branches or building out
and managing appliances in colocation facilities.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 178
The Prisma Access app is one of two management interfaces for Prisma Access (you can also use
Panorama). You'll need to decide how you want to manage Prisma Access before you begin, as you
cannot change management interfaces once you get started.
3.21 Reference
Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Leverages data from public service providers to deliver
continuous visibility, security policy compliance and threat detection across cloud resources, users, data,
and applications. This includes APIs that enable you to add cloud accounts, monitor cloud security
posture, enable data classification and malware scanning on public cloud storage, detect and respond
to threats, and maintain compliance. It includes the Visibility, Compliance, and Governance APIs, Data
Security API, and Identity and Access Management (IAM) API.
The API-based service enables granular visibility into your resources deployed on public cloud platforms
and into the network traffic flows to these resources from the internet and between instances. Prisma
Cloud also provides threat detection and response for resource misconfigurations and workload
vulnerabilities and visibility into user activity within each cloud environment. Tracking user activity helps
to identify account compromises, the escalation of privileges with privileged accounts, and insider
threats from malicious users, unauthorized activity, and inadvertent errors. Prisma Cloud continuously
monitors your cloud environments to help ensure that your cloud infrastructure is protected from these
security threats.
In addition to providing visibility and reducing risks, Prisma Cloud facilitates Security Operations Center
(SOC) enablement and adherence to compliance standards. As the service automatically discovers and
monitors compliance for new resources that are deployed in your cloud environment, it enables you to
implement policy guardrails to ensure that resource configurations adhere to industry standards; it also
helps you integrate configuration change alerts into DevSecOps workflows that automatically resolve
issues as they are discovered. This capability streamlines the process of identifying issues and detecting
and responding to a list of prioritized risks to maintain an agile development process and operational
efficiency.
Key Idea
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 179
Here are some highlights of Prisma Cloud:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 180
● Contextual Alerting—Leverages highly contextual alerts for prioritization and rapid response.
Because Prisma Cloud also integrates with external vulnerability services such as AWS Inspector,
Tenable.io, and Qualys to continuously scan your environment, it gains additional context to
identify unexpected and potentially unauthorized and malicious activity. For example, the
service scans for unpatched hosts, escalation of privileges, and use of exposed credentials, and
also scans communication for malicious IP addresses, URLs, and domains.
● Cloud Forensics—Enables you to go back to any point in time and investigate an issue within
seconds. To help you identify security blind spots and investigate issues, Prisma Cloud monitors
network traffic from sources such as AWS VPC flow logs, Azure flow logs, GCP flow logs, Amazon
GuardDuty, and user activity from AWS CloudTrail and Azure.
● Compliance Reporting—Reports your risk posture to your management team, to your board of
directors, and to auditors.
● Data Security—Scans data stored on AWS S3 buckets and provides visibility on the scan results
directly on the Prisma Cloud dashboard. The data security capabilities include predefined data
policies and associated data classification profiles such as PII, Financial, or Healthcare &
Intellectual Property that scan your objects stored in the S3 bucket to identify exposure – how
sensitive information is kept private, or exposed or shared externally, or allows unauthorized
access. It also integrates the industry-leading WildFire service to detect known and unknown
malware that may have infiltrated any Amazon Web Service Simple Storage Service (AWS S3)
buckets.
3.22 Reference
● The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) defines cloud computing in
Special Publication (SP) 800-145 as “a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand
network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly
provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction.”
● Integrate security into your IDE, SCM and CI workflows to detect and prevent issues as early
as possible.
● Virtual machines provide the greatest levels of isolation, compatibility, and control in the
continuum and are suitable for running nearly any type of workload.
● In the DevOps model, developers frequently deliver small amounts of code for continuous
testing.
● Cloud resources and SaaS applications must be correctly configured and adhere to your
organization’s security standards from day one to prevent successful attacks.
● “Cloud native” refers to a methodology of software development essentially designed for
cloud delivery and exemplifies all the benefits of the cloud by nature.
● Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is an important part of the Zero Trust philosophy of “never
trust, always verify” developed by Forrester.
● The combination of inline and API-based CASB capabilities is called a multimode CASB
● Prisma Cloud continuously monitors your cloud environments to ensure that your cloud
infrastructure is protected from security threats.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 181
Domain 4: Elements of Security Operations
4.1 Describe the main elements included in the development of SOC business objectives
Security operations centers can go by many names, including Cyber Defense Center or Security
Intelligence Center. A security operations center, or SOC, is typically thought of as a physical room or
area in an organization’s office where cybersecurity analysts work to monitor enterprise systems.
Security operations can be defined more broadly as a function that identifies, investigates, and
mitigates threats. If there is a person in an organization responsible for looking at security logs, that fits
the role of security operations. Continuous improvement is also a key activity of a security operations
organization.
Mission
Developing, documenting, and socializing the mission statement for your security operations is one of
the most important elements of the organization. It will define to you, and to the business, the purpose
of the SOC. This should include the objectives of the security operations organization and the goals the
organization expects to achieve for the business.
Socializing the mission statement and getting buy-in from executives provides clear expectations and
scope of the security operations team’s responsibilities. Some mission statements include defending an
organization, protecting assets, or enabling the business. Some, like service providers, are
customer-focused. Others provide openness, as university systems do. Each mission statement is
unique; however, they do have some common properties. The mission statement should define what
actions will be taken, how those actions will be executed, and what the results are to the business.
Key Idea
Governance
Governance measures performance against the defined and socialized mission statement. It defines
the rules and processes put in place to ensure proper operation of the organization. It can include
principles, mandates, standards, enforcement criteria, and SLAs. Additionally, it defines how the security
operations team will be managed and who is responsible for ensuring the team continually meets the
mission of the business. This should include actions performed to ensure the mission objectives are
met.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 182
Planning
Planning includes details on how the security operations organization will achieve its goals. Main
business drivers must be identified and documented. Other inclusions consist of vision, strategy, service
scope, deliverables, responsibilities, accountability, operational hours, stakeholders and a statement of
success.
Planning ought to include a three-year vision, ensuring the continuation of operations – even in times of
rotating executives that may have execution variances – to provide the expected value to the business.
Planning also ought to incorporate an investment strategy. This not only includes technology purchases
but automation goals and investment in people. It should tightly align to the business. If there is a large
M&A strategy or digital transformation to the cloud, for example, the investment plan should align to
those initiatives.
4.1.1 Reference
● Elements of Security Operations,
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/resources/ebooks/elements-of-soc
Case Management
An SOC’s necessary capability includes a clear protocol for documenting and escalating incidents. Case
management is a collaborative process that involves documenting, monitoring, tracking and notifying
the entire organization of security incidents and their current status. The minimum set of data points
that should be captured in a case, as well as the tool users select for this function, should be capable of
handling this data. Often, organizations will utilize multiple tools (ticketing, SOAR, email, etc.) for case
management. However, this path is ill-advised, as it severs data continuity and incident handling
efficiency takes a hit.
Case management should also include a definition of who will have access to the data and tools, how
cases will be documented in a consistent manner, and how teams will collaborate to close out incidents.
A case management system should also be encrypted with strict access controls enforced due to the
highly sensitive data that it will contain.
Budget
A financial plan for the costs of running the SOC should begin with an agreement on the mission of the
SOC. Then, the technology, staff, facility, training, and additional needs to achieve that mission are
identified. From there, a budget can be established to meet the minimum requirements of the team.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 183
Often, a SOC budget is set from the top-down or assigned a percentage of an IT budget. This approach
is not business focused and will result in frustration between capabilities and expectations from the
business.
Once the budget is established, it should be followed by a regular review to identify additional needs or
surplus. The timeline for regular budget requests and approval should be documented to avoid
surprises or a last-minute rush to defend the organization’s needs. Define the process needed to
change the allocated budget, as well as a process for emergency budget relief.
A business-savvy budgeting resource can help the security operations organization navigate CapEx
spending vs. OpEx spending and the expectations of the business. Be aware that government SOCs
have additional considerations around the timing of elections and possible party-switching, which
could result in dramatic budget shifts.
Metrics
If analysts spend time gathering metrics that cannot drive change, then this process will prove, at best,
a waste of time. Worse, this method can drive the wrong behavior. Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR)
provides a clear example of this danger. MTTR is a fine metric when used in an NOC (where uptime is
key) but can be detrimental when used in an SOC. Holding analysts accountable for MTTR will result in
rushed and incomplete analyses; analysts will rush to close incidents rather than do full investigations
that can feed learning back into the controls to prevent future attacks. This will not produce better
outcomes or reduced risk for the business.
Another poor metric is counting the number of firewall rules deployed. Organizations can put in place
10,000 firewall rules, but if the first is inaccurate, then the rest are useless. This is similar to measuring
the number of data feeds into a SIEM. If there are 15 data feeds but only one use-case, then the data
feeds aren’t being properly utilized and are a potentially expensive waste.
Caution should be taken when measuring peoples’ performance. Ranking top performers by number of
incidents handled can have skewed results and may lead to analysts “cherry-picking” incidents that
they know are fast to resolve. Additionally, evaluating individual performance in this way violates the law
in various countries.
Reporting
Reporting ought to give an account of what analysts have observed, heard, done, or investigated. It
should quantify activity and demonstrate the value the security operations team provides to the
business or client organizations in the case of an MSSP. Reporting outcomes will not necessarily drive
changes in behavior but can track current activity. Reports are typically generated daily, weekly and
monthly.
Daily reports should include open incidents, with details centered on daily activity. Weekly reports
should identify security trends to initiate threat-hunting activities, which includes the number of cases
opened and closed and conclusions of the tickets (malicious, benign, false positives). Include such
information as how many different security use cases were triggered and their severity, as well as how
they were distributed through the hours of the day.
Monthly reports should focus on the overall effectiveness of the SecOps function. These reports should
cover topics such as how long events are sitting in queue before being triaged, if the staffing in the SOC
is appropriate (do more resources need to be added or reassigned), the efficacy of rule fires, and if rules
that never fire or always fire result in a false-positive.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 184
Business Liaisons
A growing trend is for security organizations to hire business liaisons. This role ties in to the different
aspects of the business and helps to identify and explain the impact of security. This includes keeping
up to date with new product launches and development schedules, onboarding new branch offices,
and handling mergers and acquisitions where legacy networks/applications need to be brought into
the main security program. This role can also assume responsibilities for partner, vendor, and team
interface management.
DevOps
The DevOps team’s responsibilities include developing, implementing, and maintaining
company-created applications. This role has evolved greatly with the adoption of cloud apps and agile
development, where application upgrades are now rolled out within minutes, rather than the long
cycles where we would see major releases only every six to 12 months. The DevOps team’s main
motivation is to push bug-free features out to users as rapidly as possible. Some groups work security
protocols into their release cycles, but so far most do not.
Security operations will need to interface with the DevOps team to work protocol into the release
procedures and to get ahead of the new development tools and features tested/used by DevOps.
Additionally, the SecOps team will want to familiarize themselves with the DevOps processes and
procedures in order to reduce friction between the teams.
Security operations can be complex. However, by breaking them down into discrete
elements, you can assess which of the elements are covered in a SOC and to what
extent. Then use the element map to evolve security operations toward methods that provide better
prevention and remediation faster.
The elements of security operations are broken down into six pillars. These pillars
range from capabilities the business requires from the SOC to the operationalization of
those capabilities.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 185
1. Business
The Business pillar defines the business objectives and management strategies of the security
operations team. Business questions that require an answer include:
● Mission: What are we doing?
● Planning: How are we going to do it?
● Governance: How are we going to manage what we are doing?
● Staffing: Who do we need to do this?
● Facility: Where are we going to do this?
● Budget: What will it cost to do this?
● Metrics: How will we know whether it works effectively?
● Reporting: How will we track activity and provide updates?
● Collaboration: How will we communicate and track issues with the rest of the business?
2. People
The People pillar defines the humans who will accomplish the goals of the security operations team
and how to manage them. Questions to answer include:
● How will we find staff and train them to fulfill their roles?
● What will we do to retain them?
● How will we manage the workloads of the staff?
● How will we validate the efficacy of the actions of the staff?
3. Interfaces
The Interfaces pillar defines what functions to involve to achieve the stated goals. Security operations is
not a silo and needs to work with many other functions of the business. We describe each of these
interactions as “interfaces,” and they should clearly define expectations between the groups. Each
group will have different goals and motivations that, when understood, will help create positive team
interactions. Identifying the scope of responsibility and separation of duties will also reduce friction
within an organization. Questions to answer include:
● What other functions of the business impact security operations?
● What other functions of the business does security operations impact?
● How will the security operations team work alongside these other functions?
● Who has ownership of responsibilities and what, if any, service-level agreements (SLAs) need to
be documented?
● At what interval will these interfaces be reviewed and updated?
4. Visibility
The Visibility pillar defines what information the SecOps function needs access to. This includes security
and systems data, as well as knowledge management content and communications through
collaboration tools. Questions to answer include:
● What primary security data does the SecOps team need access to?
● What contextual data is needed?
● How often does this data need to be refreshed?
● What knowledge base information needs to be accessed?
● How will the security operations team see activity in the SOC?
● How will external teams see activity in the SOC?
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 186
5. Technology
The Technology pillar defines the needs to achieve visibility into the necessary information in the
security operations organization. It is important to note that each element should not be thought of as
a different tool but rather a capability that should be achieved with the given technology stack.
Technologies and capabilities change rapidly, so these are the most fluid elements of a security
operations team.
A glut of siloed tools in the industry leads to a variety of issues, including extensive vendor
management, limited feature use, duplicate functionality, and, sometimes, end-user degradation. PAN
sees a shift, with organizations moving away from best-of-breed siloed tools toward platforms that
provide capabilities needed in the SOC without the need for installation and maintenance of different
tools. Questions to answer for the Technology pillar include:
● What capabilities are required to achieve the necessary visibility?
● What technology will provide these capabilities?
● Who will be responsible for the licensing, implementation, and maintenance of the technology?
● How will technology and content updates be requested and performed?
● What updates will be carried out automatically and at what interval?
6. Processes
The Processes pillar defines the processes and procedures executed by the security operations
organization to achieve the determined mission. Questions to answer include:
● What processes need to be defined?
● Where will the processes and procedures be documented?
● How will this documentation be accessed and socialized?
● Who will have responsibility for keeping this documentation updated?
● How often will the processes need to be reviewed and updated?
4.3.1 References
● The Six Pillars of Effective Security Operations
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/2020/01/cortex-security-operations/
The majority of a Security Operations Analyst’s time is spent in the identify phase due to false positives
and low-fidelity alerts they must weed through. Correctly implemented prevention-based architectures
and automated correlation help reduce the time needed for this phase. Analysts also spend a lot of time
in the mitigation phase. The lack of automated remediation drives this trend, along with complex or
lacking interfaces with teams outside of the security operations organization that need to be involved in
halting the attack.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 187
4.4.1 Identify
Alerting
An alert determines whether an event is important enough to become an actionable incident. The
function has a high opportunity to utilize automation.
Content Engineering
The content engineering function builds the necessary alerting profiles to identify the alerts that will be
forwarded for investigation. The content engineer and the security operations teams need feedback
continuously flowing between them.
Initial Research
Initial research is a set of high-level processes utilized by an organization to begin an investigation into a
suspicious alert. The results of the initial research provide context around an incident to help in
gathering information to triage, escalate, and determine if further investigation is needed or if the alert
is malicious or benign.
Severity Triage
Severity triage defines the event prioritization based on impact to the business to help guide the
analyst’s action through the Incident Response lifecycle. When utilizing automation to assign an initial
severity, the analyst reviews that severity assignment and then validates it against the uniqueness of
the organization. This verifies or modifies the severity and prioritization of the incident against other
priorities.
Escalation Process
Escalation guidelines enable the security operations team to increase the organization’s awareness of a
potential issue and receive the necessary support.
4.4.2 Investigate
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 188
Detailed Analysis
Detailed analysis encompasses a deeper investigation into an incident to determine if it is truly
malicious, identify the scope of the attack, and document the observed impact. It involves a manual
process to answer the questions: What? Where? When? Why? Who? and How? Additionally, a detailed
analysis helps to confidently determine if an incident is a “true” incident. In the event of a false positive,
feedback should be provided to the Content Engineer so they can tune alerts, or to the security
engineering team so they may update controls.
4.4.3 Mitigate
Mitigation
Once an incident has been validated, a mitigation strategy must be executed. The mitigation strategy
consists of a set of processes as well as interface agreements to contain the security incident. This
typically includes documentation of any actions taken by the security team and temporary controls that
can be implemented to quickly stop an attack, which should lead to permanent controls to prevent
future attacks.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 189
Breach Response
A true breach requires a plan separate from standard mitigation. It defines how to effectively respond
during a critical severity incident. The first piece of this plan is to identify the cross-functional
stakeholders, including corporate communications, legal teams, and third-parties as appropriate. Then
assign a timeline of when each stakeholder should become involved and how they will be initially
notified.
Change Control
In cases of both manual and automated mitigation, a change control process must be in place to
monitor, document, and control changes being made. A good change control process ensures
alterations to the environment have a minimized impact to business and documentation in case a
look-back review needs to be performed. The information required for this documentation should be
identified and ideally contained in a formalized template. This process should have timelines for
reviewing and rolling back temporary changes. Also included should be who can request changes, the
steps needed to initiate change, and any prerequisites or change windows available for the
modification.
Interface Agreements
Interface agreements define how the security operations team and surrounding teams will interact with
each other. These agreements list the teams involved and detail the scope of work and responsibilities
for each team. SLAs and change request processes and escalation should be referred to in cases where
an interface agreement is not upheld. Communication paths and tools used between the teams should
be identified. Regularly review all agreements. Additionally, set and clearly state the intervals of reviews.
4.4.4 Improve
Tuning
Tuning refers to adjustments made to the alerting procedures regarding security incidents based on
the outcomes of security investigations. It is an important step in reducing false positives and
low-fidelity alerts in the SOC. An analyst may determine, during the course of a security incident, that
there is a better way to detect the incident to increase visibility at the SIEM. When this occurs, the
analyst will engage the tuning process to improve that visibility for future incidents. General tuning
should be based on metrics collected from systems in the SOC. This includes a process to retire alerts
when they are stale or ineffective.
The tuning process should define:
● Who or what triggers tuning efforts
● The thresholds for those triggers
● A review process for existing alerts
● The steps to request modifications to existing alerts (to increase visibility of future security
incidents based on the outcome of a security investigation)
PAN recommends that alerts be reviewed – at minimum – on a quarterly cadence with a monthly
review of alert metrics.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 190
Process Improvement
Adjustments must also be made to the incident response lifecycle based on the results of security
incidents and new threats. New technologies introduced to the SOC and the business may also require
IR process updates. The process should include information about who can update the IR processes
(this person must be a qualified resource knowledgeable in IR). Changes need not be made daily, so IR
process updates should define how often processes should be reviewed, which will vary by process. All
improvements should be reviewed and then socialized with affected groups.
Capability Improvement
Capability improvement is rooted in revisiting prior incidents and asking how these incidents can be
better prevented or mitigated in the future. This results in adjustments to the alerting profile,
prevention posture, and automation techniques. Sometimes the goal is to prevent an attack, while
other times it’s to stop a breach faster or gather the appropriate information needed for quicker
investigation. Ideally, this effort should be on-going and follow every investigation. In most cases that is
not possible, so a monthly review of incidents should occur to identify opportunities for capability
improvement.
Quality Review
As new tuning measures, processes, and capabilities are implemented, a thorough peer evaluation of
the changes should be carried out to ensure effectiveness and value to the business. Additionally,
incident workflows and documentation should also be reviewed to confirm consistency within the IR
process, which will result in a higher level of capability from the security operations organization.
Identifying the person responsible for reviewing changes and closed cases must be documented along
with a cadence for the review process. That resource must be given time to perform these reviews
outside of their normal duties. A process should be created to define what severity cases require review,
what items in the case will be reviewed, how feedback will be provided, and what training opportunities
arise from the reviews. The identified training must then be delivered to the security operations
organization (and sometimes beyond the SecOps group) to improve the overall efficiency and efficacy
of preventing breaches.
Originally designed as a tool to assist organizations with compliance and industry-specific regulations,
security information and event management (SIEM) is a technology that has been around for almost
two decades. It combines security information management (SIM) with security event management
(SEM) and provides the foundation for cybersecurity threat detection capabilities. SIEM technology
helps to manage security incidents through the collection and analysis of log data, security events, and
other event or data sources.
Key Idea
● Security operations center (SOC) analysts use SIEM tools to manage security
incidents, and detect and respond to potential threats quickly.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 191
According to Gartner, businesses looking for SIEM today need the solution to collect security event logs
and telemetry in real time for threat detection, incident response, and compliance use cases, with the
ability to analyze the telemetry to detect attacks and other flagged activities. SIEMs also provide the
ability to investigate incidents, report on activities, and store the relevant events and logs.
SIEM software brings together event and log data from end-user devices, servers, network
infrastructure, security devices, and applications, and aggregates the data into a centralized platform
for easy access. Data collected can then be sorted into designated actionable categories that can
recognize deviations from normal activity. This makes it easier for incident response teams to identify
threats and investigate security alerts and incidents. SIEM solutions can be deployed on-premises,
hybrid, and more increasingly, cloud-based. Cloud-based SIEMs offer faster and simpler deployment,
and can scale automatically to accommodate increases in data sources or data ingestion.
4.5.1 References
● What Is Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-security-information-and-event-manage
ment
4.6 Describe the purpose of security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR)
Companies and organizations find value in SOAR because it minimizes the impact of security incidents
of all types while maximizing the value of existing security investments, and reduces the risk of legal
liability and business downtime overall. SOAR helps companies address and overcome their security
challenges by enabling them to:
● Unify their existing security systems and centralize data collection to gain full visibility, thus
greatly improving the company's security posture and operational efficiency and productivity.
● Automate repetitive manual tasks and manage all aspects of the security incident lifecycle,
therefore increasing analyst productivity and freeing up analysts to focus on improving security
instead of on performing manual tasks.
● Define incident analysis and response procedures as well as leverage security playbooks to
prioritize, standardize, and scale response processes in a consistent, transparent, and
documented way.
● Engage in faster incident response as analysts can quickly and accurately identify and assign
incident severity levels to security alerts, reducing alerts, and alleviating alert fatigue.
● Streamline processes and operations to better identify and manage potential vulnerabilities
both proactively and reactively.
● Supports real-time collaboration and unstructured investigations by routing each security
incident to the analyst best suited to respond to it while providing functions that support easy
communication and tracking between teams and team members.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 192
SOAR systems allow for accelerated incident response through the execution of standardized and
automated playbooks that work upon inputs from security technology and other data flows.
Key Idea
● SOAR tools ingest aggregated alerts from detection sources (such as SIEMs,
network security tools, and mailboxes) before executing automatable,
process-driven playbooks to enrich and respond to these alerts.
The playbooks coordinate across technologies, security teams, and external users for centralized data
visibility and action. They help accelerate incident response times and increase analyst productivity.
They standardize processes and thus provide consistency, which improves operational confidence in
SOC capabilities.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 193
SOAR Use Cases
Handling Phishing enrichment and response – ingesting potential phishing emails; triggering a
security alerts playbook; automating and executing repeatable tasks, such as triaging and engaging
affected users; extracting and checking indicators; identifying false positives; and priming the
SOC for a standardized response at scale.
Endpoint malware infection – pulling in threat feed data from endpoint tools, enriching that
data, cross-referencing retrieved files/hashes with a security information and event
management (SIEM) solution, notifying analysts, cleaning endpoints, and updating the
endpoint tool database.
Failed user logins – after a predefined number of failed user login attempts, assessing
whether a failed login is genuine or malicious by triggering a playbook, engaging users,
analyzing their replies, expiring passwords, and closing the playbook.
Logins from unusual locations – identifying potentially malicious virtual private network
(VPN) access attempts by checking VPN and cloud access security broker (CASB) presence,
cross-referencing IPs, confirming a breach with the user, issuing a block, and closing the
playbook.
Managing security Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) certificate management – checking endpoints to see which SSL
operations certificates have expired or will soon expire, informing users, rechecking the status a few days
later, escalating an issue to the appropriate people, and closing the playbook.
Endpoint diagnostics and kickstart – checking connectivity and agent connectivity, enriching
context, opening a ticket, kickstarting agents, and closing the playbook.
Hunting for threats Indicators of compromise (IOC) hunting – taking in and extracting IOCs from attached files,
and responding to hunting IOCs across threat intelligence tools, updating databases, and closing the playbook.
incidents
Malware analysis – ingesting data from multiple sources, extracting and detonating malicious
files, generating and displaying a report, checking for malice, updating the database, and
closing the playbook.
Cloud-aware incident response – consuming data from cloud-focused threat detection and
event logging tools, unifying processes across cloud and on-premises security infrastructures,
correlating with a SIEM, extracting and enriching indicators, checking for malice, turning over
control to analysts and having them review the information, update the database, and close
the playbook.
Automating data IOC enrichment – ingesting data from multiple sources; extracting any indicators that need
enrichment to be detonated; enriching URLs, IPS and hashes; checking for malice; updating the database;
inviting analysts to review and investigate the information; and closing the playbook.
Assigning incident severity – checking other products for a vulnerability score and to see
whether existing indicators have been assigned a score, assigning severity, checking
usernames and endpoints to see if they are on a critical list, assigning critical severity, and
closing an incident.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 194
4.6.1 References
● What Is SOAR? https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-soar
4.7 Describe the analysis tools used to detect evidence of a security compromise
Analysis tools include advanced techniques, tools, and algorithms that provide the ability to detect
evidence of security compromise within large volumes of data. Processes should be defined to explain
how an analyst will determine whether an alert is malicious and the chosen tools should assist or
automate this process. The tools also should provide access to gather context, preferably automated
about the given event. Ownership, budget, and the support model for the tools need to be defined.
Analysis tools often are based on machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence that
provide either standalone, embedded, or add-on functionality to detect evidence of a security
compromise. Security analytics can be performed on data either stored at rest or collected in motion,
even at line speed on a massive network. This capability can be obtained by SecOps teams in a variety
of different ways, with most security products and services including some sort of security analytics
function.
Analysis tools include advanced techniques, tools, and algorithms that provide the ability to detect
evidence of security compromise within large volumes of data. Processes should be defined for
how an analyst will determine whether an alert is malicious and the chosen tools should assist or
automate this process. The tools also should provide access to gather context, preferably
automated about the given event. Ownership, budget, and the support model for the tools need to
be defined.
Analysis tools often are based on machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence that
provide either standalone, embedded, or add-on functionality to detect evidence of a security
compromise. Security analytics can be performed on data that is either stored at rest or collected in
motion, even at line speed on a massive network. This capability can be obtained by SecOps teams in a
variety of different ways with most security products and services including some sort of security
analytics function.
Endpoint Protection
Today’s modern endpoint protection solutions help to secure endpoints by analyzing files before and
after they execute to look for signs of suspicious activity or indicators of potential threats. This analysis is
typically done via a single agent from the cloud to allow for speed and scalability with little if any impact
on end-user device performance.
Administrators monitor and control endpoints through a centralized management console that can
remotely connect to devices whether they are connected to the internet or not. Logs can often be
forwarded from these centralized management points to a central collection point for security analysis.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 195
Network Traffic Capture
Network traffic captures provide the ability to intercept and log traffic traversing network appliances.
This can be accomplished with firewalls, IDS/IPS, proxies, routers, switches, and standalone traffic
capture technologies. Logging of this traffic provides visibility to the security operations organization for
detailed analysis and advanced investigations. Raw traffic logs should be accessible by analysts but not
presented to them unless tied to an alert or as queried by the staff.
Firewall
Firewalls are an essential cybersecurity control to separate networks and enforce restrictions for
communications between them. They can be physical devices in a datacenter or implemented virtually
to protect assets in the cloud. Firewall functionality varies and can include URL Filtering, IPS/IDS,
antivirus, SSL decryption, and VPNs, among other features to consolidate capabilities into a single tool.
They can be set up to monitor boundary traffic as well as lateral traffic and used for network
segmentation to further lock down a business’s critical assets. They are a key tool for the team to gain
visibility into network traffic through logs and alerts received from different points in the environment.
The security operations team should define what information they require from the firewall, including
additional context for investigation of alerts. Many firewalls are not configured out-of-the-box to provide
this context, so the security operations team may have to drive that requirement with the network
security team. Although firewalls provide the visibility that analysts need, they can also be a burden to
the analysts if not continuously updated with new policies and/or if they are not tuned properly and
provide overwhelming low-fidelity data to the SOC.
Malware Sandbox
A malware sandbox is used as a safe place to simulate an end user’s environment to test unknown
applications that may contain viruses or other types of malicious code. A security team can “detonate”
malicious code to observe the behavior and impact to systems and networks without impacting the
whole of the environment. Malware sandbox features can include malicious file analysis, API call tracing,
and memory analysis, along with other advanced capabilities. The sandbox should be set up to analyze
the impact to all operating systems used in the environment and should produce ample logs from
which to generate security controls. The security operations team is typically not responsible for using
the malware sandbox but benefits from the information gathered during simulations.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 196
Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is a technology solution that collects, aggregates and organizes threat
intel data from multiple sources and formats. A TIP provides security teams with information on known
malware and other threats, powering efficient and accurate threat identification, investigation and
response. It enables threat analysts to spend their time analyzing data and investigating potential
security threats rather than spending their time collecting and managing data. Moreover, a TIP allows
security and threat intelligence teams to easily share threat intelligence data with other stakeholders
and security systems. A TIP can be deployed as either a software-as-a-service (SaaS) or as an
on-premises solution.
4.9 Describe the use of analysis tools within a security operations environment
A number of SecOps tools exist to help security teams successfully run the SOC. These tools have grown
in number as technology evolves and can present a complex mix of siloed tools to manage. Fortunately,
consolidation of capabilities has begun across the industry to provide less tools with more functionality.
4.9.1 References
● Security Operations (SecOps),
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-security-operations
The SOC engineering team’s responsibilities encompass the implementation and ongoing
maintenance of the security operation team’s tools, including the SIEM and analysis tools. This team’s
responsibilities must be clearly defined. Will they be responsible for licensing, maintenance and
updating tools? Will they manage the underlying architecture (CPU, RAM, storage, cloud
implementation) or will that be handled by another team? Use the team’s SLAs to cut down friction
between teams as well as to establish clear communication plans.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 197
4.11 Describe the Cortex platform in a security operations environment and the purpose of Cortex
XDR for various endpoints
XDR solutions bring a proactive approach to threat detection and response. It delivers visibility across all
data, including endpoint, network, and cloud data, while applying analytics and automation to address
today’s increasingly sophisticated threats. With XDR, cybersecurity teams can:
From a business perspective, XDR platforms enable organizations to prevent successful cyberattacks as
well as simplify and strengthen security processes. This, in turn, lets them better serve users and
accelerate digital transformation initiatives – because when users, data, and applications are protected,
companies can focus on strategic priorities.
XDR Benefits
● Block known and unknown attacks with endpoint protection: Block malware, exploits, and
fileless attacks with integrated AI-driven antivirus and threat intelligence.
● Gain visibility across all your data: Collect and correlate data from any source to detect, triage,
investigate, hunt, and respond to threats.
● Automatically detect sophisticated attacks 24/7: Use out-of-the-box analytics and custom
rules to detect advanced persistent threats and other covert attacks.
● Avoid alert fatigue: Simplify investigations with automated root cause analysis and a unified
incident engine, reducing the number of alerts your team needs to review and lowering the skill
required for triage.
● Increase SOC productivity: Consolidate endpoint security policy management and monitoring,
investigation, and response across your network, endpoint, and cloud environments in one
console, thereby increasing SOC efficiency.
● Root out adversaries without disrupting your users: Stop attacks while avoiding user or
system downtime.
● Shut down advanced threats: Protect your network against insider abuse, external attacks,
ransomware, fileless and memory-only attacks, and advanced zero-day malware.
● Force multiply your security team: Stop every stage of an attack by detecting indicators of
compromise (IOCs) and anomalous behavior as well as prioritizing analysis with incident scoring.
● Restore hosts after a compromise: Quickly recover from an attack by removing malicious files
and registry keys, as well as restoring damaged files and registry keys by using remediation
suggestions.
● Extend detection and response to third-party data sources: Enable behavioral analytics on
logs collected from third-party firewalls while integrating third-party alerts into a unified
incident view and root cause analysis for faster investigations.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 198
What is EDR Security?
Endpoint detection and response refers to a category of tools used to find and investigate threats on
endpoint devices. EDR tools typically provide detection, analysis, investigation, and response
capabilities. Compared to these security solutions, XDR takes a wider view by integrating data from
endpoint, cloud, identity, and other solutions.
EDR products monitor events generated by endpoint agents to look for suspicious activity, and the
alerts they create help SecOps analysts identify, investigate, and remediate issues. These solutions also
collect telemetry data on suspicious activity and may enrich that data with other contextual
information from correlated events. However, they lack key capabilities that slow down incident
response.
Key Idea
● EDR solutions do not offer integrations with other tools and data sources for
full visibility, so they cannot provide holistic protection.
4.11.1 References
● What is endpoint detection and response (EDR)?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-endpoint-detection-and-response-edr
● What is XDR?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/what-is-xdr
Security teams lack the people and scalable processes to keep pace with an overwhelming volume of
alerts and endless security tasks. Analysts waste time pivoting across consoles for data collection,
determining false positives, and performing manual, repetitive tasks throughout the lifecycle of an
incident.
Cortex XSOAR enhances Security Operations Center (SOC) efficiency with the world’s most
comprehensive operating platform for enterprise security. Cortex XSOAR unifies case management,
automation, real-time collaboration, and native threat intel management in the industry’s first
extended security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) offering. Teams can manage alerts
across all sources, standardize processes with playbooks, take action on threat intelligence, and
automate response for any security use case, resulting in up to 90 percent faster response times and as
much as a 95 percent reduction in alerts requiring human intervention.
4.13 Describe how Cortex Data Lake improves security operations visibility
Palo Alto Networks Cortex Data Lake provides cloud-based logging for our security products, including
our next-generation firewalls, Prisma Access, and Cortex XDR. Cortex Data Lake lets you collect
ever-expanding volumes of data without needing to plan for local compute and storage, and is ready to
scale from the start.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 199
Cortex Data Lake enables AI-based innovations for cybersecurity with the industry’s only approach to
normalizing and stitching together your enterprise’s data. Get public cloud scale and locations with
assurance of the security and privacy of your data. Significantly improve the accuracy of security
outcomes with trillions of multi-source artifacts for analytics. Cortex Data Lake can:
● Radically simplify your security operations by collecting, integrating, and normalizing your
enterprise’s security data.
● Effortlessly run advanced AI and machine learning with cloud-scale data and compute.
● Constantly learns from new data sources to evolve your defenses
Organizations often lack the visibility they need to stop attacks. Data is typically locked in silos across
cloud, endpoint, and network assets, preventing tools from effectively finding, investigating, or
automating threat response. Cortex Data Lake is the industry’s only approach to normalizing and
stitching together your enterprise’s data. It automatically collects, integrates and normalizes data across
your security infrastructure. With unified data, you can run advanced AI and machine learning to
radically simplify security operations with apps built on Cortex. Tight sensor integration allows new data
sources and types to be continually added to evolve your defenses.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 200
Figure: Cortex Data Lake data sources
4.14 Describe how XSIAM can be used to accelerate SOC threat response
The SIEM category has served security operations for many years as a way to aggregate and analyze
alerts and logs, albeit with incremental improvement in security outcomes. As a result, security
operations teams continued to bolt on new tools that promised to solve point problems, resulting in a
fragmented and ineffective security architecture. As compute and data storage have improved
exponentially, it is essential to radically reimagine how we can deliver real-time security that can match
pervasive, AI-powered cyberattacks. XSIAM is the revolutionary approach that collects granular data —
not just logs and alerts — to drive machine learning for natively autonomous response actions, such as
cross-correlation of alerts and data, detection of highly sophisticated, emerging threats, and automated
remediation based on native threat intelligence and attack surface data.
Specifically, Cortex XSIAM will transform security operations by enabling organizations to:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 201
● Proactively outpace threats.
Cortex XSIAM enables continuous discovery of vulnerabilities through native attack surface
management and automated response based integrated threat intelligence from tens of
thousands of Palo Alto Networks customers.
4.14.1 References
● Cortex Data Lake.
https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/cortex/cortex-data-lake/cortex-data-lake-getting-started/get-s
tarted-with-cortex-data-lake/overview
● What is endpoint detection and response (EDR)?
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2022/palo-alto-networks-introduces-the-auto
nomous-security-platform--cortex-xsiam--to-reimagine-siem-and-soc-analytics
Appendix: Glossary
● Address Resolution Protocol (ARP): A protocol that translates a logical address, such as an
IP address, to a physical MAC address. RARP translates a physical MAC address to a logical
address. See also IP address, media access control (MAC) address, and Reverse Address
Resolution Protocol (RARP).
● Advanced Encryption Standard (AES): A symmetric block cipher based on the Rijndael
cipher.
● AES: See Advanced Encryption Standard (AES).
● AI: See artificial intelligence (AI).
● American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII): A character-encoding
scheme based on the English alphabet, consisting of 128 characters.
● Android Packet Kit (APK): An app created for the Android mobile operating system.
● API: See application programming interface (API).
● APK: See Android Package Kit (APK).
● APP: See Australian Privacy Principles (APP).
● Application programming interface (API): A set of routines, protocols, and tools for building
software applications and integrations.
● AR: See augmented reality (AR).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 202
● ARP: See Address Resolution Protocol (ARP).
● Artificial intelligence (AI): The ability of a system or application to interact with and learn
from its environment and automatically perform actions accordingly, without requiring
explicit programming.
● AS: See autonomous system (AS).
● ASCII: See American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII).
● Attack vector: A path or tool that an attacker uses to target a network. Also known as a
threat vector.
● Augmented reality (AR): Augmented reality enhances a real-world environment with virtual
objects.
● Australian Privacy Principles (APP): The Privacy Act 1988 establishes standards for collecting
and handling personal information, referred to as the Australian Privacy Principles (APP).
● Authoritative DNS server: The system of record for a given domain. See also Domain Name
System (DNS).
● Autonomous system (AS): A group of contiguous IP address ranges under the control of a
single internet entity. Individual autonomous systems are assigned a 16-bit or 32-bit AS
number (ASN) that uniquely identifies the network on the internet. ASNs are assigned by the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). See also Internet Protocol (IP) address and
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).
● Bare-metal hypervisor: See native hypervisor.
● BES: See bulk electric system (BES).
● Blockchain: A data structure containing transactional records (stored as blocks) that ensures
security and transparency through a vast, decentralized peer-to-peer network with no single
controlling authority. Cryptocurrency is an internet-based financial instrument that uses
blockchain technology. See also cryptocurrency.
● Boolean: A system of algebraic notation used to represent logical propositions.
● Boot sector: Contains machine code loaded into an endpoint’s memory by firmware during
the startup process, before the operating system is loaded.
● Boot sector virus: Targets the boot sector or master boot record (MBR) of an endpoint’s
storage drive or other removable storage media. See also boot sector and master boot record
(MBR).
● Bot: Individual endpoints that are infected with advanced malware that enables an attacker
to take control of the compromised endpoint. Also known as a zombie. See also botnet and
malware.
● Botnet: A network of bots (often tens of thousands or more) working together under the
control of attackers using numerous command-and-control (C2) servers. See also bot.
● Bridge: A wired or wireless network device that extends a network or joins separate network
segments.
● Bring your own access (BYOA): A remote access policy in which remote users are allowed to
connect to the corporate network using personal wireless service (for example, cellular
service for a personal smartphone) from a wireless network operator.
● Bring your own device (BYOD): A policy trend in which organizations permit end users to
use their own personal devices, primarily smartphones and tablets, for work-related
purposes. BYOD relieves organizations from the cost of providing equipment to employees,
but creates a management challenge because of the vast number and type of devices that
must be supported.
● Broadband cable: A type of high-speed internet access that delivers different upload and
download data speeds over a shared network medium. The overall speed varies depending
on the network traffic load from all the subscribers on the network segment.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 203
● Broadcast domain: The portion of a network that receives broadcast packets sent from a
node in the domain.
● Bulk electric system (BES): The large interconnected electrical system, consisting of
generation and transmission facilities (among others), that comprises the “power grid.”
● Bus topology: A LAN topology in which all nodes are connected to a single cable (the
backbone) that is terminated on both ends. In the past, bus networks were commonly used
for very small networks because they were inexpensive and relatively easy to install, but today
bus topologies are rarely used. The cable media has physical limitations (the cable length),
the backbone is a single point of failure (a break anywhere on the network affects the entire
network), and tracing a fault in a large network can be extremely difficult. See also local-area
network (LAN).
● BYOA: See bring your own access (BYOA).
● BYOD: See bring your own device (BYOD).
● California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): A privacy rights and consumer protection statute
enacted in 2018 for residents of California. It became effective on January 1, 2020.
● CASB: See cloud access security broker (CASB).
● CCPA: See California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
● CD: See continuous delivery (CD).
● CDN: See content delivery network (CDN).
● Child process: In multitasking operating systems, a subprocess created by a parent process
currently running on the system.
● CI: See continuous integration (CI).
● CIDR: See classless inter-domain routing (CIDR).
● CIP: See Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP).
● Circuit-switched network: A network in which a dedicated physical circuit path is
established, maintained, and terminated between the sender and receiver across a network
for each communications session.
● Classless inter-domain routing (CIDR): A method for allocating IP addresses and IP routing
that replaces classful IP addressing (for example, Class A, B, and C networks) with classless IP
addressing. See also Internet Protocol (IP) address.
● Cloud access security broker (CASB): Software that monitors activity and enforces security
policies on traffic between an organization’s users and cloud-based applications and services.
● Collision domain: A network segment on which data packets may collide with each other
during transmission.
● Consumerization: A computing trend describing the process that occurs as end users
increasingly find personal technology and apps that are more powerful or capable, more
convenient, less expensive, quicker to install, and easier to use than enterprise IT solutions.
● Container: A standardized, executable, and lightweight software code package that contains
all the necessary components to run a given application or applications, including code,
runtime, system tools and libraries, and configuration settings in an isolated and virtualized
environment to enable agility and portability of the application workload(s).
● Content delivery network (CDN): A network of distributed servers that distributes cached
web pages and other static content to a user from the geographic location physically closest
to the user.
● Continuous deployment: An automated CI pipeline that requires the code to pass
automated testing before it is automatically deployed, giving customers instant access to
new features. See also continuous integration (CI).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 204
● Continuous integration (CI): A development process that requires developers to integrate
code into a repository several times per day for automated testing. Each check-in is verified
by an automated build, allowing teams to detect problems early.
● Continuous delivery (CD): An automated CI pipeline that requires the code to go through
manual technical checks before it is implemented into production. See also continuous
integration (CI).
● Convergence: The time required for all routers in a network to update their routing tables
with the most current routing information about the network.
● Covered entity: Defined by HIPAA as a healthcare provider that electronically transmits PHI
(such as doctors, clinics, psychologists, dentists, chiropractors, nursing homes, and
pharmacies), a health plan (such as a health insurance company, health maintenance
organization, company health plan, or government program, including Medicare, Medicaid,
military and veterans’ healthcare), or a healthcare clearinghouse. See also Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and protected health information (PHI).
● CRC: See cyclic redundancy check (CRC).
● Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP): Cybersecurity standards defined by NERC to protect
the physical and cyber assets necessary to operate the bulk electric system (BES). See also
bulk electric system (BES) and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).
● Cryptocurrency: A form of digital currency, such as Bitcoin, that uses encryption to control
the creation of currency and verify the transfer of funds independent of a central bank or
authority.
● Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2014: A U.S. regulation that provides an ongoing,
voluntary public-private partnership to improve cybersecurity and to strengthen
cybersecurity research and development, workforce development and education, and public
awareness and preparedness.
● Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act (CISA): A U.S. regulation that enhances information
sharing about cybersecurity threats by allowing internet traffic information to be shared
between the U.S. government and technology and manufacturing companies.
● Cyclic redundancy check (CRC): A checksum used to create a message profile. The CRC is
recalculated by the receiving device. If the recalculated CRC doesn’t match the received CRC,
the packet is dropped and a request to resend the packet is transmitted back to the device
sending the packet.
● DAAS: Data, assets, applications, and services.
● Data encapsulation: A process in which protocol information from the OSI or TCP/IP layer
immediately above is wrapped in the data section of the OSI or TCP/IP layer immediately
below. Also referred to as data hiding. See also Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model
and Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model.
● Data hiding: See data encapsulation.
● Data mining: Enables patterns to be discovered in large datasets using machine learning,
statistical analysis, and database technologies. See also machine learning.
● DDOS: See distributed denial-of-service (DDOS).
● Default gateway: A network device, such as a router or switch, to which an endpoint sends
network traffic when a specific destination IP address is not specified by an application or
service, or when the endpoint does not know how to reach a specified destination. See also
router and switch.
● DevOps: The culture and practice of improved collaboration between application
development and IT operations teams.
● DGA: See domain generation algorithm (DGA).
● DHCP: See Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 205
● Digital subscriber line (DSL): A type of high-speed internet access that delivers different
upload and download data speeds. The overall speed depends on the distance from the
home or business location to the provider’s central office (CO).
● Distributed denial-of-service (DDOS): A type of cyberattack in which extremely high
volumes of network traffic such as packets, data, or transactions are sent to the target victim’s
network to make their network and systems (such as an e-commerce website or other web
application) unavailable or unusable.
● DLL: See dynamic-link library (DLL).
● DNS: See Domain Name System (DNS).
● DNS over HTTPS (DoH): DNS traffic that is encrypted using the HTTPS protocol. See also
Domain Name System (DNS) and Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS).
● DoH: See DNS over HTTPS (DOH).
● Domain generation algorithm (DGA): A program designed to generate domain names in a
particular fashion. Attackers developed DGAs so that malware can quickly generate a list of
domains that it can use for command and control (C2).
● Domain name registrar: An organization that is accredited by a TLD registry to manage
domain name registrations. See also top-level domain (TLD).
● Domain Name System (DNS): A hierarchical distributed database that maps the FQDN for
computers, services, or any resource connected to the internet or a private network to an IP
address. See also fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
● Drive-by download: A software download, typically malware, that occurs without a user’s
knowledge or permission.
● DSL: See digital subscriber line (DSL).
● Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP): A network management protocol that
dynamically assigns (leases) IP addresses and other network configuration parameters (such
as default gateway and DNS information) to devices on a network. See also default gateway
and Domain Name System (DNS).
● Dynamic-link library (DLL): A type of file used in Microsoft operating systems that enables
multiple programs to simultaneously share programming instructions contained in a single
file to perform specific functions.
● EAP: See Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP).
● EAP-TLS: See Extensible Authentication Protocol Transport Layer Security (EAP-TLS).
● EBCDIC: See Extended Binary-Coded Decimal Interchange Code (EBCDIC).
● EHR: See electronic health record (EHR).
● Electronic health record (EHR): As defined by HealthIT.gov, an EHR “goes beyond the data
collected in the provider’s office and include[s] a more comprehensive patient history. EHR
data can be created, managed, and consulted by authorized providers and staff from across
more than one healthcare organization.”
● Electronic medical record (EMR): As defined by HealthIT.gov, an EMR “contains the standard
medical and clinical data gathered in one provider’s office.”
● EMR: See electronic medical record (EMR).
● Endpoint: A computing device such as a desktop or laptop computer, handheld scanner, IoT
device or sensor (such as an autonomous vehicle, smart appliance, smart meter, smart TV, or
wearable device), point-of-sale (POS) terminal, printer, satellite radio, security or
videoconferencing camera, self-service kiosk, smartphone, tablet, or VoIP phone. Although
endpoints can include servers and network equipment, the term is generally used to
describe end-user devices. See also internet of things (IoT) and Voice over Internet Protocol
(VoIP).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 206
● Enterprise 2.0: A term introduced by Andrew McAfee and defined as “the use of emergent
social software platforms within companies, or between companies and their partners or
customers.” See also Web 2.0.
● Exclusive or (XOR): A Boolean operator in which the output is true only when the inputs are
different (for example, TRUE and TRUE equals FALSE, but TRUE and FALSE equals TRUE). See
also Boolean.
● Exploit: A small piece of software code, part of a malformed data file, or a sequence (string) of
commands, that leverages a vulnerability in a system or software, thereby causing
unintended or unanticipated behavior in the system or software.
● Extended Binary-Coded Decimal Interchange Code (EBCDIC): An 8-bit character-encoding
scheme largely used on mainframe and mid-range computers.
● Extended reality (XR): Broadly covers the spectrum from physical to virtual reality with
various degrees of partial sensory to fully immersive experiences.
● Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP): A widely used authentication framework that
includes about 40 different authentication methods.
● Extensible Authentication Protocol Transport Layer Security (EAP-TLS): An Internet
Engineering Task Force (IETF) open standard that uses the Transport Layer Security (TLS)
protocol in Wi-Fi networks and PPP connections. See also Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF), Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP), and Transport Layer Security (TLS).
● Extensible Markup Language (XML): A programming language specification that defines a
set of rules for encoding documents in a human-readable and machine-readable format.
● FaaS: See function as a service (FaaS).
● False negative: In anti-malware, this refers to malware that is incorrectly identified as a
legitimate file or application. In intrusion detection, a false negative is a threat incorrectly
identified as legitimate traffic. See also false positive.
● False positive: In anti-malware, this refers to a legitimate file or application that is incorrectly
identified as malware. In intrusion detection, a false positive refers to legitimate traffic that is
incorrectly identified as a threat. See also false negative.
● Favicon (“favorite icon”): A small file containing one or more small icons associated with a
particular website or webpage.
● Federal Exchange Data Breach Notification Act of 2015: A U.S. regulation that further
strengthens HIPAA by requiring health insurance exchanges to notify individuals whose
personal information has been compromised as the result of a data breach as soon as
possible, but no later than 60 days after breach discovery. See also Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
● Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA): See Federal Information Security
Modernization Act (FISMA).
● Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA): A U.S. law that implements a
comprehensive framework to protect information systems used in U.S. federal government
agencies. Known as the Federal Information Security Management Act prior to 2014.
● Fiber optic: Technology that converts electrical data signals to light and delivers constant
data speeds in the upload and download directions over a dedicated fiber optic cable
medium. Fiber optic technology is much faster and more secure than other types of network
technology.
● File Transfer Protocol (FTP): A program used to copy files from one system to another over a
network.
● FISMA: See Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA).
● Floppy disk: A removable magnetic storage medium commonly used from the mid-1970s
until about 2007, when it was largely replaced by removable USB storage devices.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 207
● Flow control: A technique used to monitor the flow of data between devices to ensure that a
receiving device, which may not necessarily be operating at the same speed as the
transmitting device, doesn’t drop packets.
● FQDN: See fully qualified domain name (FQDN).
● FTP: See File Transfer Protocol (FTP).
● Fully qualified domain name (FQDN): The complete domain name for a specific computer,
service, or resource connected to the internet or a private network.
● Function as a service (FAAS): A cloud computing service that provides a platform for
customers to develop, run, and manage their application functions without having to build
and maintain the infrastructure normally required to develop and launch an application.
● GDPR: See General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
● General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A European Union (EU) regulation that applies
to any organization that does business with EU residents. It strengthens data protection for
EU residents and addresses the export of personal data outside the EU.
● Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE): A tunneling protocol developed by Cisco Systems
that can encapsulate various Network layer protocols inside virtual point-to-point links.
● GIF: See Graphics Interchange Format (GIF).
● GLBA: See Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA).
● Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA): A U.S. law that requires financial institutions to implement
privacy and information security policies to safeguard the non-public personal information of
clients and consumers.
● Graphics Interchange Format (GIF): A bitmap image format that allows up to 256 colors and
is suitable for images or logos (but not photographs).
● GRE: See Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE).
● Hacker: Term originally used to refer to anyone with highly specialized computing skills,
without connoting good or bad purposes. However, common misuse of the term has
redefined a hacker as someone that circumvents computer security with malicious intent,
such as a cybercriminal, cyberterrorist, or hacktivist.
● Hash signature: A cryptographic representation of an entire file or program’s source code.
● Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): A U.S. law that defines data
privacy and security requirements to protect individuals’ medical records and other personal
health information. See also covered entity and protected health information (PHI).
● Heap spray: A technique used to facilitate arbitrary code execution by injecting a certain
sequence of bytes into the memory of a target process.
● Hextet: A group of four 4-bit hexadecimal digits in a 128-bit IPv6 address. See also Internet
Protocol (IP) address.
● High-order bits: The first four bits in a 32-bit IPv4 address octet. See also Internet Protocol
(IP) address, octet, and low-order bits.
● HIPAA: See Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
● Hop count: The number of router nodes that a packet must pass through to reach its
destination.
● Hosted hypervisor: A hypervisor that runs within an operating system environment. Also
known as a Type 2 hypervisor. See also hypervisor and native hypervisor.
● HTTP: See Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP).
● HTTPS: See Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS).
● Hub: A device used to connect multiple networked devices together on a local-area network
(LAN). Also known as a concentrator.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 208
● Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP): An application protocol used to transfer data between
web servers and web browsers.
● Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS): A secure version of HTTP that uses SSL or TLS
encryption. See also Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS).
● Hypervisor: Technology that allows multiple, virtual (or guest) operating systems to run
concurrently on a single physical host computer.
● IaaS: See Infrastructure as a service (IaaS).
● IaC: See infrastructure as code (IaC).
● IAM: See Identity and Access Management (IAM).
● IANA: See Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).
● ICMP: See Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP).
● IDE: See integrated development environment (IDE).
● Identity and Access Management (IAM): A framework of business processes, policies, and
technologies that facilitates the management of electronic or digital identities.
● IETF: See Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
● IMAP: See Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP).
● Indicator of compromise (IoC): A network or operating system (OS) artifact that provides a
high level of confidence that a computer security incident has occurred.
● Infrastructure as a service (IaaS). A cloud computing service model in which customers can
provision processing, storage, networks, and other computing resources and deploy and run
operating systems and applications. However, the customer has no knowledge of, and does
not manage or control, the underlying cloud infrastructure. The customer has control over
operating systems, storage, and deployed applications, along with some networking
components (for example, host firewalls). The company owns the deployed applications and
data, and it is therefore responsible for the security of those applications and data.
● Infrastructure as code (IaC): A DevOps process in which developers or IT operations teams
can programmatically provision and manage the infrastructure stack (such as virtual
machines, networks, and connectivity) for an application in software. See also DevOps.
● Initialization vector (IV): A random number used only once in a session, in conjunction with
an encryption key, to protect data confidentiality. Also known as a nonce.
● Integrated development environment (IDE): A software application that provides
comprehensive tools, such as a source code editor, build automation tools, and a debugger
for application developers.
● Inter-process communication (IPC): A mechanism in an operating system that makes it
possible to concurrently coordinate activities and manage shared data between different
program processes.
● Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA): A private, nonprofit U.S. corporation that
oversees global IP address allocation, autonomous system (AS) number allocation, root zone
management in the Domain Name System (DNS), media types, and other Internet
Protocol-related symbols and internet numbers. See also autonomous system (AS) and
Domain Name System (DNS).
● Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP): An internet protocol used to transmit diagnostic
messages.
● Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): An open international community of network
designers, operators, vendors, and researchers concerned with the evolution of the internet
architecture and the smooth operation of the internet.
● Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP): A store-and-forward email protocol that allows
an email client to access, manage, and synchronize email on a remote server.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 209
● Internet of things (IoT): The IoT refers to the network of physical smart, connected objects
that are embedded with electronics, software, sensors, and network connectivity.
● Internet Protocol (IP) address: A 32-bit or 128-bit identifier assigned to a networked device
for communications at the Network layer of the OSI model or the Internet layer of the TCP/IP
model. See also Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model and Transmission Control
Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model.
● Intranet: A private network that provides information and resources such as a company
directory, human resources policies and forms, department or team files, and other internal
information to an organization’s users. Like the internet, an intranet uses the HTTP and/or
HTTPS protocols, but access to an intranet typically is restricted to an organization’s internal
users. Microsoft SharePoint is a popular example of intranet software. See also Hypertext
Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure (HTTPS).
● IoC: See indicator of compromise (IoC).
● IoT: See internet of things (IoT).
● IP address: See Internet Protocol (IP) address.
● IP telephony: See Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP).
● IPC: See inter-process communication (IPC).
● IV: See initialization vector (IV).
● Jailbreaking: Hacking an Apple iOS device to gain root-level access to the device. This
hacking is sometimes done by end users to allow them to download and install mobile apps
without paying for them, from sources, other than the App Store, that are not sanctioned
and/or controlled by Apple. Jailbreaking bypasses the security features of the device by
replacing the firmware’s operating system with a similar, albeit counterfeit version, which
makes the device vulnerable to malware and exploits. See also rooting.
● Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG): A photographic compression method used to
store and transmit photographs.
● JPEG: See Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG).
● Kerberos: An authentication protocol in which tickets are used to identify network users.
● LAN: See local-area network (LAN).
● Least privilege: A network security principle in which only the permission or access rights
necessary to perform an authorized task are granted.
● Least significant bit: The last bit in a 32-bit IPv4 address octet. See also Internet Protocol (IP)
address, octet, and most significant bit.
● Linear bus topology: See bus topology.
● LLC: See Logical Link Control (LLC).
● Local-area network (LAN): A computer network that connects laptop and desktop
computers, servers, printers, and other devices so that applications, databases, files and file
storage, and other networked resources can be shared across a relatively small geographic
area such as a floor, a building, or a group of buildings.
● Logical Link Control (LLC): A sublayer of the OSI model Data Link layer that manages the
control, sequencing, and acknowledgement of frames and manages timing and flow control.
See also Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model and flow control.
● Long-Term Evolution (LTE): A type of 4G cellular connection that provides fast connectivity,
primarily for mobile internet use.
● Low-order bits: The last four bits in a 32-bit IPv4 address octet. See also Internet Protocol (IP)
address, octet, and high-order bits.
● LTE: See Long-Term Evolution (LTE).
● M2M: See machine to machine (M2M).
● MAC address: See media access control (MAC) address.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 210
● Machine learning: A subset of AI that applies algorithms to large datasets to discover
common patterns in the data that then can be used to improve the performance of the
system. See also artificial intelligence (AI).
● Machine to machine (M2M): M2M devices are networked devices which exchange data and
can perform actions without manual human interaction.
● Malware: Malicious software or code that typically damages, takes control of, or collects
information from an infected endpoint. Malware broadly includes viruses, worms, trojan
horses (including remote access trojans, or RATs), anti-AV, logic bombs, back doors, root kits,
boot kits, spyware, and (to a lesser extent) adware.
● Master boot record (MBR): The first sector on a computer hard drive, containing information
about how the logical partitions (or file systems) are organized on the storage media, and an
executable boot loader that starts up the installed operating system.
● MBR: See master boot record (MBR).
● MEC: See multi-access edge computing (MEC).
● Media access control (MAC) address: A unique 48-bit or 64-bit identifier assigned to a
network interface card (NIC) for communications at the Data Link layer of the OSI model. See
also Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.
● Metamorphism: A programming technique used to alter malware code with every iteration,
to avoid detection by signature-based anti-malware software. Although the malware payload
changes with each iteration, for example, by using a different code structure or sequence, or
inserting garbage code to change the file size, the fundamental behavior of the malware
payload remains unchanged. Metamorphism uses more advanced techniques than
polymorphism. See also polymorphism.
● MFA: See multi-factor authentication (MFA).
● Microsoft Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol (MS-CHAP): A protocol used to
authenticate Microsoft Windows-based workstations using a challenge-response mechanism
to authenticate PPTP connections without sending passwords. See also Point-to-Point
Tunneling Protocol (PPTP).
● Mixed reality (MR): Includes technologies such as VR, AR, and XR that deliver an immersive
and interactive physical and digital sensory experience in real time. See also augmented
reality (AR), extended reality (XR), and virtual reality (VR).
● Most significant bit: The first bit in a 32-bit IPv4 address octet. See also Internet Protocol (IP)
address, octet, and least significant bit.
● Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG): An audio and video compression method used to
store and transmit audio and video files.
● MPEG: See Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG).
● MPLS: See multiprotocol label switching (MPLS).
● MR: See mixed reality (MR).
● MS-CHAP: See Microsoft Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol (MS-CHAP).
● Multi-access edge computing (MEC): MEC is defined by the European Telecommunications
Standards Institute (ETSI) as an environment “characterized by ultra-low latency and high
bandwidth as well as real-time access to radio network information that can be leveraged by
applications”.
● Multicloud: An enterprise cloud environment (or strategy) consisting of two or more public
and/or private clouds.
● Multi-factor authentication (MFA): Any authentication mechanism that requires two or
more of the following factors: something you know, something you have, something you are.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 211
● Multiprotocol label switching (MPLS): MPLS is a networking technology that routes traffic
using the shortest path based on “labels,” rather than network addresses, to handle
forwarding over private wide-area networks.
● Mutex: A program object that allows multiple program threads to share the same resource,
such as file access, but not simultaneously.
● NAT: See network address translation (NAT).
● National Cybersecurity Protection Advancement Act of 2015: A U.S. regulation that
amends the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enhance multidirectional sharing of
information related to cybersecurity risks and strengthens privacy and civil liberties
protections.
● Native hypervisor: A hypervisor that runs directly on the host computer hardware. Also
known as a Type 1 or bare-metal hypervisor. See also hypervisor and hosted hypervisor.
● Natural language search: The ability to understand human spoken language and context,
rather than a Boolean search, for example, to find information. See also Boolean.
● NERC: See North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC).
● Network address translation (NAT): A technique used to virtualize IP addresses by mapping
private, non-routable IP addresses assigned to internal network devices to public IP
addresses.
● Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive: A European Union (EU) directive that
imposes network and information security requirements for banks, energy companies,
healthcare providers and digital service providers, among others.
● NIS Directive: See Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive.
● Nonce: See initialization vector (IV).
● North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC): A not-for-profit international
regulatory authority responsible for ensuring the reliability of the bulk electric system (BES) in
the continental United States, Canada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Mexico.
See also bulk electric system (BES) and Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP).
● Obfuscation: A programming technique used to render code unreadable. It can be
implemented using a simple substitution cipher, such as an XOR operation, or more
sophisticated encryption algorithms, such as AES. See also Advanced Encryption Standard
(AES), exclusive or (XOR), and packer.
● Octet: A group of 8 bits in a 32-bit IPv4 address. See Internet Protocol (IP) address.
● One-way hash function: A mathematical function that creates a unique representation (a
hash value) of a larger set of data in a manner that is easy to compute in one direction (input
to output), but not in the reverse direction (output to input). The hash function can’t recover
the original text from the hash value. However, an attacker could attempt to guess what the
original text was and see if it produces a matching hash value.
● Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model: A seven-layer networking model consisting of
the Application (Layer 7 or L7), Presentation (Layer 6 or L6), Session (Layer 5 or L5), Transport
(Layer 4 or L4), Network (Layer 3 or L3), Data Link (Layer 2 or L2), and Physical (Layer 1 or L1)
layers. Defines standard protocols for communication and interoperability using a layered
approach in which data is passed from the highest layer (application) downward through
each layer to the lowest layer (physical), then transmitted across the network to its
destination, then passed upward from the lowest layer to the highest layer. See also data
encapsulation.
● Optical carrier: A standard specification for the transmission bandwidth of digital signals on
SONET fiber optic networks. Optical carrier transmission rates are designated by the integer
value of the multiple of the base rate (51.84Mbps). For example, OC-3 designates a 155.52Mbps
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 212
(3 x 51.84) network and OC-192 designates a 9953.28Mbps (192 x 51.84) network. See also
synchronous optical networking (SONET).
● OSI model: See Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.
● PaaS: See platform as a service (PaaS).
● Packer: A software tool that can be used to obfuscate code by compressing a malware
program for delivery, then decompressing it in memory at runtime. See also obfuscation.
● Packet capture (pcap): A traffic intercept of data packets that can be used for analysis.
● Packet-switched network: A network in which devices share bandwidth on
communications links to transport packets between a sender and receiver across a network.
● PAP: See Password Authentication Protocol (PAP).
● Password Authentication Protocol (PAP): An authentication protocol used by PPP to
validate users with an unencrypted password. See also Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP).
● Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS): A proprietary information
security standard mandated and administered by the PCI Security Standards Council (SSC),
and applicable to any organization that transmits, processes, or stores payment card (such as
debit and credit cards) information. See also PCI Security Standards Council (SSC).
● pcap: See packet capture (pcap).
● PCI: See Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS).
● PCI DSS: See Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS).
● PCI Security Standards Council (SSC): A group comprising Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, Discover, and JCB that maintains, evolves, and promotes PCI DSS. See also Payment
Card Industry Data Security Standards (PCI DSS).
● PDU: See protocol data unit (PDU).
● Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA): A Canadian
privacy law that defines individual rights with respect to the privacy of their personal
information, and governs how private sector organizations collect, use, and disclose personal
information in the course of business.
● Personally identifiable information (PII): Defined by the U.S. National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) as “any information about an individual maintained by an agency,
including (1) any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity…
and (2) any other information that is linked or linkable to an individual….”
● Pharming: A type of attack that redirects a legitimate website’s traffic to a fake site.
● PHI: See protected health information (PHI).
● PII: See personally identifiable information (PII).
● PIPEDA: See Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
● PKI: See public key infrastructure (PKI).
● Platform as a service (PaaS): A cloud computing service model in which customers can
deploy supported applications onto the provider’s cloud infrastructure, but the customer has
no knowledge of, and does not manage or control, the underlying cloud infrastructure. The
customer has control over the deployed applications and limited configuration settings for
the application-hosting environment. The company owns the deployed applications and
data, and it is therefore responsible for the security of those applications and data.
● Playbooks: Task-based graphic workflows that help visualize processes across security
products. Playbooks can be fully automated, fully manual, or anywhere in between. Also
known as runbooks.
● PoE: See Power over Ethernet (PoE).
● Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP): A Layer 2 (Data Link) protocol layer used to establish a direct
connection between two nodes.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 213
● Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP): An obsolete method for implementing virtual
private networks, with many known security issues, that uses a TCP control channel and a
GRE tunnel to encapsulate PPP packets. See also Transmission Control Protocol (TCP),
Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), and Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP).
● Polymorphism: A programming technique used to alter a part of malware code with every
iteration, to avoid detection by signature-based anti-malware software. For example, an
encryption key or decryption routine may change with every iteration, but the malware
payload remains unchanged. See also metamorphism.
● POP3: See Post Office Protocol Version 3 (POP3).
● Post Office Protocol Version 3 (POP3): An email retrieval protocol that allows an email client
to access emails on a remote email server.
● Power over Ethernet (PoE): A network standard that provides electrical power to certain
network devices over Ethernet cables.
● PPP: See Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP).
● PPTP: See Point-to-Point Tunneling Protocol (PPTP).
● Pre-shared key (PSK): A shared secret, used in symmetric key cryptography that has been
exchanged between two parties communicating over an encrypted channel.
● Private cloud: A cloud computing model that consists of a cloud infrastructure that is used
exclusively by a single organization.
● Product integrations (or apps): Mechanisms through which SOAR platforms communicate
with other products. These integrations can be executed through REST APIs, webhooks, and
other techniques. An integration can be unidirectional or bidirectional, with the latter
allowing both products to execute cross-console actions. See also security orchestration,
automation, and response (SOAR), representational state transfer (REST), and application
programming interface (API).
● Protect surface: In a Zero Trust architecture, the protect surface consists of the most critical
and valuable data, assets, application, and services (DAAS) on a network.
● Protected health information (PHI): Defined by HIPAA as information about an individual’s
health status, provision of healthcare, or payment for healthcare that includes identifiers such
as names, geographic identifiers (smaller than a state), dates, phone and fax numbers, email
addresses, Social Security numbers, medical record numbers, or photographs. See also
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
● Protocol data unit (PDU): A self-contained unit of data (consisting of user data or control
information and network addressing).
● PSK: See pre-shared key (PSK).
● Public cloud: A cloud computing deployment model that consists of a cloud infrastructure
that is open to use by the general public.
● Public key infrastructure (PKI): A set of roles, policies, and procedures needed to create,
manage, distribute, use, store, and revoke digital certificates and manage public key
encryption.
● QoS: See quality of service (QoS).
● Quality of service (QoS): The overall performance of specific applications or services on a
network including error rate, bit rate, throughput, transmission delay, availability, jitter, etc.
QoS policies can be configured on certain network and security devices to prioritize certain
traffic, such as voice or video, over other, less performance-intensive traffic, such as file
transfers.
● RADIUS: See Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS).
● Rainbow table: A precomputed table used to find the original value of a cryptographic hash
function.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 214
● RARP: See Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP).
● RASP: See runtime application self-protection (RASP).
● RBAC: See role-based access control (RBAC).
● Recursive DNS query: A DNS query that is performed (if the DNS server allows recursive
queries) when a DNS server is not authoritative for a destination domain. The
non-authoritative DNS server obtains the IP address of the authoritative DNS server for the
destination domain and sends the original DNS request to that server to be resolved. See also
Domain Name System (DNS) and authoritative DNS server.
● Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS): A client-server protocol and
software that enables remote access servers to communicate with a central server to
authenticate users and authorize access to a system or service.
● Remote Procedure Call (RPC): An inter-process communication (IPC) protocol that enables
an application to be run on a different computer or network, rather than on the local
computer on which it is installed.
● Repeater: A network device that boosts or retransmits a signal to physically extend the range
of a wired or wireless network.
● Representational state transfer (REST): An architectural programming style that typically
runs over HTTP and is commonly used for mobile apps, social networking websites, and
mashup tools. See also Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP).
● REST: See representational state transfer (REST).
● Reverse Address Resolution Protocol (RARP): A protocol that translates a physical MAC
address to a logical address. See also media access control (MAC) address.
● Ring topology: A LAN topology in which all nodes are connected in a closed loop that forms
a continuous ring. In a ring topology, all communication travels in a single direction around
the ring. Ring topologies were common in token ring networks. See also local-area network
(LAN).
● Role-based access control (RBAC): A method for implementing discretionary access
controls in which access decisions are based on group membership according to
organizational or functional roles.
● Rooting: The Google Android equivalent of jailbreaking. See jailbreaking.
● Router: A network device that sends data packets to a destination network along a network
path.
● RPC: See remote procedure call (RPC).
● Runtime application self-protection (RASP): Technology that detects attacks against an
application in real time. RASP continuously monitors an app’s behavior and the context of
behavior to immediately identify and prevent malicious activity.
● SaaS: See software as a service (SaaS).
● Salt: Randomly generated data that is used as an additional input to a one-way hash
function that hashes a password or passphrase. The same original text hashed with different
salts results in different hash values. See also one-way hash function.
● Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act: A U.S. law that increases financial governance and accountability
in publicly traded companies.
● SASE: See Secure Access Service Edge (SASE).
● SCM: See software configuration management (SCM).
● Script kiddie: Someone with limited hacking and/or programming skills that uses malicious
programs (malware) written by others to attack a computer or network. See also malware.
● SCTP: See Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP).
● SD-WAN: See software-defined wide-area network (SD-WAN).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 215
● Secure Access Service Edge (SASE): An integrated solution that provides consistent
networking and security services and access to cloud applications delivered through a
common framework.
● Secure Shell (SSH): A more secure alternative to Telnet for remote access. SSH establishes an
encrypted tunnel between the client and the server and can also authenticate the client to
the server. See also telnet.
● Secure Sockets Layer (SSL): A cryptographic protocol for managing authentication and
encrypted communication between a client and server to protect the confidentiality and
integrity of data exchanged in the session.
● Secure web gateway (SWG): A security platform or service that is designed to maintain
visibility in web traffic. Additional functionality may include web content filtering.
● Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR): Technology that helps
coordinate, execute, and automate tasks between various people and tools, allowing
companies to respond quickly to cybersecurity attacks and improve their overall security
posture. SOAR tools use playbooks to automate and coordinate workflows that may include
any number of disparate security tools and human tasks. See also playbook.
● Serverless: Generally refers to an operational model in cloud computing in which
applications rely on managed services that abstract away the need to manage, patch, and
secure infrastructure and virtual machines. Serverless applications rely on a combination of
managed cloud services and FaaS offerings. See also function as a service (FaaS).
● Service set identifier (SSID): A case sensitive, 32-character alphanumeric identifier that
uniquely identifies a Wi-Fi network.
● Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): An open signaling protocol standard for establishing,
managing, and terminating real-time communications such as voice, video, and text over
large IP-based networks.
● Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP): A protocol used to send and receive email across the
internet.
● Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP): A protocol used to collect information by
polling stations and sending traps (or alerts) to a management station.
● SIP: See Session Initiation Protocol (SIP).
● SMTP: See Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP).
● SNMP: See Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
● SOAR: See security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR).
● Software as a service (SaaS): A category of cloud computing services in which the customer
is provided access to a hosted application maintained by the service provider.
● Software-defined wide-area network (SD-WAN): A virtualized service that separates the
network control and management processes from the underlying hardware in a wide-area
network, and makes them available as software.
● Software configuration management (SCM): The task of tracking and controlling changes
in software.
● SONET: See synchronous optical networking (SONET).
● SOX: See Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Act.
● Spear phishing: A highly targeted phishing attack that uses specific information about the
target to make the phishing attempt appear legitimate.
● SSH: See Secure Shell (SSH).
● SSID: See service set identifier (SSID).
● SSL: See Secure Sockets Layer (SSL).
● STIX: See Structured Threat Information Expression (STIX).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 216
● Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP): A message-oriented protocol (similar to UDP)
that ensures reliable, in-sequence transport with congestion control (similar to TCP). See also
User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
● Structured Threat Information Expression (STIX): An XML format for conveying data about
cybersecurity threats in a standardized format. See also Extensible Markup Language (XML).
● Subnet mask: A number that hides the network portion of an IPv4 address, leaving only the
host portion of the IP address. See also Internet Protocol (IP) address.
● Subnetting: A technique used to divide a large network into smaller, multiple subnetworks.
● Supernetting: A technique used to aggregate multiple contiguous smaller networks into a
larger network to enable more efficient internet routing.
● SWG: See secure web gateway (SWG).
● Switch: An intelligent hub that forwards data packets only to the port associated with the
destination device on a network.
● Synchronous optical networking (SONET): A protocol that transfers multiple digital bit
streams synchronously over optical fiber.
● T-carrier: A full-duplex digital transmission system that uses multiple pairs of copper wire to
transmit electrical signals over a network. For example, a T-1 circuit consists of two pairs of
copper wire – one pair transmits, the other pair receives – that are multiplexed to provide a
total of 24 channels, each delivering 64Kbps of data, for a total bandwidth of 1.544Mbps.
● TCP: See Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
● TCP segment: A PDU defined at the Transport layer of the OSI model. See also protocol data
unit (PDU) and Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model.
● TCP/IP model: See Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model.
● Technical debt: A software development concept, which has also been applied more
generally to IT, in which additional future costs are anticipated for rework due to an earlier
decision or course of action that was necessary for agility, but not necessarily the most
optimal or appropriate decision or course of action.
● Telnet: A terminal emulator used to provide remote access to a system.
● Three-way handshake: A sequence used to establish a TCP connection. For example, a PC
initiates a connection with a server by sending a TCP SYN (Synchronize) packet. The server
replies with a SYN ACK packet (Synchronize Acknowledgment). Finally, the PC sends an ACK
or SYN-ACK-ACK packet, acknowledging the server’s acknowledgement, and data
communication commences. See also Transmission Control Protocol (TCP).
● Threat vector: See attack vector.
● TLD: See top-level domain (TLD).
● TLS: See Transport Layer Security (TLS).
● Top-level domain (TLD): The highest-level domain in DNS, represented by the last part of a
FQDN (for example, .com or .edu). The most commonly used TLDs are generic top-level
domains (gTLD) such as .com, edu, .net, and .org, and country-code top-level domains (ccTLD)
such as .ca and .us. See also Domain Name System (DNS).
● Transmission Control Protocol (TCP): A connection-oriented (a direct connection between
network devices is established before data segments are transferred) protocol that provides
reliable delivery (received segments are acknowledged and retransmission of missing or
corrupted segments is requested) of data.
● Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model: A four-layer networking
model consisting of the Application (Layer 4 or L4), Transport (Layer 3 or L3), Internet (Layer 2
or L2), and Network Access (Layer 1 or L1) layers.
● Transport Layer Security (TLS): The successor to SSL (although it still is commonly referred
to as SSL). See also Secure Sockets Layer (SSL).
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 217
● Type 1 hypervisor: See native hypervisor.
● Type 2 hypervisor: See hosted hypervisor.
● UDP: See User Datagram Protocol (UDP).
● UDP datagram: A PDU defined at the Transport layer of the OSI model. See also protocol
data unit (PDU), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and Open Systems Interconnection (OSI)
model.
● UEBA: See user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA).
● User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA): A type of cybersecurity solution or feature that
discovers threats by identifying activity that deviates from a normal baseline.
● Uniform resource identifier (URI): A string of characters that uniquely identifies a resource,
using a predefined syntax in a hierarchical naming scheme.
● Uniform resource locator (URL): A unique reference (or address) to an internet resource,
such as a web page.
● URI: See uniform resource identifier (URI).
● URL: See uniform resource locator (URL).
● User Datagram Protocol (UDP): A connectionless (a direct connection between network
devices is not established before datagrams are transferred) protocol that provides best-effort
delivery (received datagrams are not acknowledged and missing or corrupted datagrams are
not requested) of data.
● Variable-length subnet masking (VLSM): A technique that enables IP address spaces to be
divided into different sizes. See also Internet Protocol (IP) address.
● Virtual local-area network (VLAN): A logical network that is created within a physical
local-area network.
● Virtual machine (VM): An emulation of a physical (hardware) computer system, including
CPU, memory, disk, operating system, network interfaces, etc.
● Virtual reality (VR): A simulated digital experience.
● VLAN: See virtual local-area network (VLAN).
● VLSM: See variable-length subnet masking (VLSM).
● VM: See virtual machine (VM).
● Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP): Technology that provides voice communication over an
Internet Protocol (IP)-based network. Also known as IP telephony.
● VoIP: See Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP).
● VR: See virtual reality (VR).
● Vulnerability: A bug or flaw that exists in a system or software and creates a security risk.
● WAN: See wide-area network (WAN).
● Watering hole: An attack that compromises websites that are likely to be visited by a
targeted victim to deliver malware via a drive-by download. See also drive-by download.
● Web 2.0: A term popularized by Tim O’Reilly and Dale Dougherty unofficially referring to a
new era of the World Wide Web, which is characterized by dynamic or user-generated
content, interaction, and collaboration, and the growth of social media. See also Enterprise
2.0.
● Web 3.0: As defined on ExpertSystem.com, Web 3.0 is characterized by the following five
characteristics: semantic web, artificial intelligence, 3D graphics, connectivity, and ubiquity.
● Whaling: A type of spear phishing attack that is specifically directed at senior executives or
other high-profile targets within an organization. See also spear phishing.
● Wide-area network (WAN): A computer network that connects multiple LANs or other
WANs across a relatively large geographic area, such as a small city, a region or country, a
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 218
global enterprise network, or the entire planet (for example, the internet). See also local-area
network (LAN).
● Wireless repeater: A device that rebroadcasts the wireless signal from a wireless router or AP
to extend the range of a Wi-Fi network.
● XML: See Extensible Markup Language (XML).
● XOR: See exclusive or (XOR).
● XR: See extended reality (XR).
● Zero-day threat: The window of vulnerability that exists from the time a new (unknown)
threat is released until security vendors release a signature file or security patch for the threat.
● Zombie: See bot.
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 219
Continuing Your Learning Journey with Palo Alto Networks
Training from Palo Alto Networks and our Authorized Training Partners delivers the knowledge and
expertise to prepare you to protect our way of life in the digital age. Our trusted security certifications
give you the Palo Alto Networks product portfolio knowledge necessary to prevent successful
cyberattacks and to safely enable applications.
Digital Learning
For those of you who want to keep up to date on our technology, a learning library of free digital
learning is available. These on-demand, self-paced digital-learning classes are a helpful way to reinforce
the key information for those who have been to the formal hands-on classes. They also serve as a useful
overview and introduction to working with our technology for those unable to attend a hands-on,
instructor-led class.
Simply register in Beacon and you will be given access to our digital-learning portfolio. These online
classes cover foundational material and contain narrated slides, knowledge checks, and, where
applicable, demos for you to access.
New courses are being added often, so check back to see new curriculum available.
Instructor-Led Training
Palo Alto Networks Authorized Training Partners (ATPs) are located globally and offer a breadth of
solutions from onsite training to public, open-environment classes. About 42 authorized training
centers are delivering online courses in 14 languages and at convenient times for most major markets
worldwide. For class schedule, location, and training offerings, see
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/services/education/atc-locations.
You also can learn from peers and other experts in the field. Check out our communities site at
https://live.paloaltonetworks.com, where you can:
Palo Alto Networks Certified Cybersecurity Entry Level Technician (PCCET) 220