Nama : Fikri Nurhakim Lecturer : Imam Mahir, M.

Pd
NIM : 1502623019 Lesson : English

Study Program : Mechanical Engineering

TASK 5 IMRD

1. Read the topic “on IMRD… “carefully!

2. Use the topic above and other previous materials to fill the table below based on your
understanding!
3. This is an individual task.

QUESTION YOUR ANSWER

1. What are the qualities of an Qualities of introductions:
introduction of a journal article? • An introduction is Story-Like. It has a plot
that answers all the "why" questions of the
reader one by one. It uses the active voice and
includes the writer ("we"). Verbs are
conjugated using various tenses: present,
past, future.
• An introduction is COMPLETE. All "why's"
have their "because". The key reference are
mentioned.
• An introduction is MINDFUL. The author
makes a real effort to assess and bridge the
knowledge gap.
• An introduction is AUTHORITATIVE.
References are accurate and numerous,
comparisons are factual (not judgemental),
related works are closely related, and
imprecise words are absent.
• An introduction is CONCISE. No
considerable or vacuous beginnings, no table
of-content paragraph, no excessive details in
answering the "why's", no historical
panegyric.
2. What should be stated on an • The introduction should begin by
introduction of a journal article? introducing the reader to pertinent literature.
• Explain the function of the research carried
out.
• According to the stakeholder's vision
literature and demonstration you need a
current degree must clearly state the scope a
goal.
• The introduction can finish with the
statement of objectives or,as some people.
• Prefer, with a brief statement of principal
findings.
3. What should be addressed on the • How did you discover the problem?
method of a journal article? - Briefly describe the common species
scientific methods you use. A title is
easy to find. Its keywords are carefully
chosen.
• What do you use (maybe subtitles as
material)
- Material, topics, and equipment
(chemicals, experimental, animals,
devices, etc) that you use. (that is
possible animal subtitles reagents, etc).
4. How to write good results of a The things that must be considered in making journal
journal article? articles so that the article can be said to be good are
seen from:
• Structure
- Consisting of titles, abstracts,
introductions, material methods, results,
tables and figures, discussions,
quotations, conclusions and reference.
• Then there are other elements that support
journal articles:
a. Information can be accounted.
b. Issuing institution
c. Writing style
d. Neat writing
e. Regularity, as well as dissemination
5. Make one example of the result and • Results in Hadith Research
discussion of journal article! The science of hadith and its methodology has been
steady since the 8th century AD. It has been a very
long time. Hadith research in the science of hadith is
called takhrij, which is a testing process to assess the
quality of the hadith whether it is authentic
(authentic as originating from the Prophet
Muhammad) or dhaif (weak).
If scientific research, in the modern era, demands
display of research results, the results of the research
from the takhrij process are an assessment of the
quality of a hadith. For example, it was found that
the hadith about quality music was authentic. Tahhrij
as a method has stratified operations, including the
assessment of the sanad (the chain of hadith
narrators) and the assessment of the matan (the text
of the hadith). The researcher can confirm in the
introduction whether to only examine the sanad or at
the same time to research the hadith texts.
After displaying the research results, usually the
scientific research model asks to abstract the
research results. Abstraction is the process of
explaining research results as they are without
interpretation. In this case, the results of takhrij are
subjects that can be abstracted, namely an
explanation of what the results of takhrij are.
If scientific research demands results and
abstractions, then takhrij hadith is a subject that is
very likely to display results and abstractions. Thus,
if socio-humanities and religious research are
directed to be able to display the results of research
by the world of modern scientific research, then
takhrij hadith can be taken as a model or model,
even though it is an outdated product in the 8th
century AD.
• Discussion in Hadith Research
After presenting the research results and abstracting
the results of the research, the world of scientific
research demands a discussion. Of course, the
discussion is not a repetition of the results. However,
it is also a good idea to emphasize the most
significant results (or unexpected results) even in
one sentence or in one paragraph. For example, it
was found that the hadith about quality music was
authentic.
Results are also understood as answers to the
questions promised in the introduction. While the
discussion is a discussion between the results and
research questions. That the question is answered,
for example, what is the quality of the hadith about
music. In this case the researcher confirms that
testing the quality of hadith about music with the
takhrij method is "proven" valid. The word "proven"
also serves as confirmation of the hypothesis (if in
quantitative research) or affirmation of predictions
and or assumptions. For example, in the introduction
the author predicts or assumes that "there is" a
quality hadith about music. The word "there" in the
introduction to the study is nothing but the
formulation of the problem. Thus, the researchers in
this discussion section have completed the
formulation of the problem, in addition to having
answered the research questions earlier.
The world of scientific research also demands to
link research results with previous studies in the
discussion section. A study can be a refutation of the
results of previous research. For example, previous
studies have stated that the hadith about music is of
poor quality. So the results of the latest research that
the hadith about quality music is valid automatically
rejects the results of previous studies. The research
result is the researcher's claim from a research
process. In this case the researcher can explain why
it produces valid judgments and why their previous
research resulted in poor research. Researchers can
reveal that the results of his research are the most
authoritative in terms of methodology. It is also
possible for researchers in this discussion section to
show support from previous research. Thus, the
literature review in the introduction section is not
only a series of previous research results, but a
review that confirms the research position whether to
reject, or support, and or synthesize in this section of
the discussion.
Research implications are also requested by the
world of scientific research. For example, the
implications of research results on the science of
fiqh. If it is found that the hadith about quality music
is valid, then the implication of its application in the
field of fiqh is that music in Islamic law is a
permissibility. However, the relationship between the
results of this study and fiqh is only speculation.
This is because this study only aims to discuss the
quality of hadith, not conducting fiqh research. The
implication is that further interdisciplinary research
must be carried out between hadith and fiqh. In fact,
research must be carried out by two people, namely
hadith experts and fiqh experts. In this case, the
researcher does not need to take the implications too
far if it is not within the scope of his research. If you
push the implications too far while it is not the
purpose of this study, it will result in bias.
The world of scientific research also demands in-
depth interpretation in the discussion section.
Related to this, takhrij research can also explain the
text of the hadith in the discussion section if the
researcher has promised this from the beginning.
Explanation of hadith texts in the science of hadith is
called syarah. If the researcher promises takhrij and
syarah at the same time, then the explanation of the
hadith text in the discussion section is a relevant job.
Of course, it must also be stated in the research
methods section that this research will apply the
takhrij method and at the same time the syarah
method. In addition, of course, a specific approach to
shariah must also be emphasized, because the
shariah method has a variety of approaches.
However, if it is only limited to takhrij, then
mention it in the discussion section honestly as a
limitation. The world of scientific research usually
asks for recommendations. So that researchers can
include suggestions about the need for sharia and its
wider implications for further research.
Recommendations usually include two dimensions,
namely first, recommendations for further research
as a consequence of research limitations, and second,
recommendations for policy makers regarding the
development of research results. Some scientific
articles ask for the inclusion of recommendations in
the discussion section, but several other scientific
articles ask for inclusion in the conclusion section.