INTRODUCTION

Finger vein recognition is a cutting-edge biometric authentication technology that has garnered
significant attention in recent years. Unlike traditional methods like fingerprints or facial
recognition, finger vein recognition relies on the unique patterns of blood vessels within an
individual's finger to verify their identity. This emerging technology holds immense promise in
enhancing security, privacy, and convenience in a wide range of applications, from access
control and financial transactions to healthcare and beyond. In this era of increasing
digitalization and concerns about identity theft and fraud, finger vein recognition offers a
highly secure and reliable means of authentication. The intricate network of blood vessels in
the finger is not only unique to each person but also highly stable over time, making it a robust
and dependable biometric identifier. Moreover, it is nearly impossible to forge or replicate
finger vein patterns, further enhancing its security. Finger vein recognition is a promising
biometric authentication technique that depends on the unique features of vein patterns in the
finger for recognition. The existing finger vein recognition methods are based on minutiae
features or binary features such as LBP, LLBP, PBBM etc. or from the entire vein pattern.
However, the minutiae-based features cannot accurately represent the structural or anatomical
aspects of the vein pattern. These issues with the minutia feature led to increased false matches.
Recognition based on binary features have limitations such as increased false matches,
sensitivity to the translation and rotation, security and privacy issues etc. A feature
representation based on the anatomy of vein patterns can be an alternative solution to improve
the recognition performance. In the IJCB 2020 conference, we showed that every finger vein
image contains one or more of a kind of 4 special vein patterns which we refereed as Fork, Eye,
Bridge, and Arch (FEBA). In this paper, we further enlarge this set to 6 vein patterns
(F1F2EB1B2A) by identifying two variations in the Fork and Bridge vein patterns. Based on 6
anatomical features of the possible 6 vein patterns in a vein image, we define a 6 6 feature
matrix representation for finger vein images. Since this feature representation is based on the
anatomical properties of the local vein patterns, it provides template security. Further we show
that, the proposed feature representation is invariant to scaling, translation, and rotation
changes. The experimental results using two open datasets and an in-house dataset show that
the proposed method has a better recognition performance when compared to the existing
approaches with an EER around 0.02% and an average recognition accuracy of 98%. Recently,
finger vein recognition has attracted considerable attention due to its contactless acquisition,
intrinsic nature and high security. Finger vein recognition biometric trait is a significant
biometric modality that is regarded as more secure, reliable, and emerging. Methods for finger
vein recognition can be broadly classified into two cate- glories depending on the type of the
feature being used: image-based and vein pattern-based. The image-based methods extract
features from both venous and non-venous. Some of the vein-pattern based methods initially
extract the vein patterns from the image and then use the binary vein pattern as the feature.
These approaches match the binary vein template with the input binary vein image using the
matched pixel ratio. However, direct vein term- plate matching is prone to security and privacy
threats. Hence, these methods require additional mechanisms to protect the vein templates.
Moreover, direct matching ignores the dis- criminating features of the vein pattern like the
morphology of the vein structure, anatomy etc. Minutiae is a major feature descriptor used for
finger vein images. Methods based on the minutiae points, extract bifurcation and endpoints
from the binary vein pattern and perform matching using distance measures. However, the
recognition accuracy of these methods are generally unsatisfactory since the minutiae points are
very few in finger vein images. Furthermore, matching points are challenging due to the
rotation, translation, and scale variations. There exists vein pattern-based methods that extract
features like minutiae, SIF, LBP etc. from the vein structure and utilize these features for
matching. Features like SIFT, has been extracted from vein patterns for recognition. However,
the performance of these methods can also get degraded under the effect of image variations.
LBP, LLBP, use pixel intensity differences of each pixel in the vein image to generate the
binary code for recognition. Since they are dependent on the pixel intensities of the entire vein
image rather than the vein pattern specifically, variations caused by image intensity changes
may have a negative impact on recognition performance. To effectively identify individuals, a
feature based on the anatomy of the vein pattern can be used since the anatomical properties of
the vein pattern can more robustly describe the features
FEASIBILITY STUDY

Performing a feasibility study for finger vein recognition using MATLAB

involves evaluating the technical, economic, and operational aspects of the
project. Here is a general outline to guide you through the process:
1. Technical Feasibility
Algorithm Selection: - Explore existing finger vein recognition algorithms. -
Assess their suitability for implementation in MATLAB MATLAB
Capabilities: - Evaluate if MATLAB provides the necessary tools and functions
for image processing and pattern recognition. c. Hardware Requirements: -
Assess the computational requirements and check if the available hardware is
sufficient.
2. Software and Tools
 List and justify the use of MATLAB for the implementation. b. Identify
any additional software or toolkits required for the project.
3. Data Collection and Preprocessing
a. Identify sources of finger vein data. b. Assess the quality of available data. c.
Explore methods for data preprocessing in MATLAB.
4. Algorithm Implementation
a. Develop a plan for implementing the chosen finger vein recognition algorithm in
MATLAB. b. Consider issues such as efficiency, accuracy, and computational
resources.
5. Performance Evaluation
a. Define metrics for evaluating the performance of the implemented system. b.
Implement testing scenarios and evaluate the algorithm's accuracy and speed.
6. Economic Feasibility
a. Cost Estimation: - Identify and estimate costs associated with hardware,
software, and personnel. b. Return on Investment (ROI): - Assess the potential
benefits of implementing finger vein recognition. - Consider factors like
increased security and efficiency.
7. Operational Feasibility
a. User Acceptance: - Evaluate potential users' acceptance of the system. b.
Integration with Existing Systems: - Assess how well the finger vein
recognition system integrates with other systems in the organization.
8. Legal and Ethical Considerations
a. Identify legal and ethical implications of implementing finger vein recognition.
b. Ensure compliance with privacy and data protection regulations.
9. Risk Analysis
a. Identify potential risks associated with the project. b. Develop a risk mitigation
plan.
10. Conclusion
 a. Summarize the findings of the feasibility study. b. Provide recommendations for
or against the implementation of the finger vein recognition system using
MATLAB.

METHODOLOGY
Creating a methodology for finger vein recognition based on anatomical features
in MATLAB involves several steps, including data collection, preprocessing,
feature extraction, and classification. Below is a general outline that you can
follow:
1. Data Collection
a. Acquire a finger vein image dataset that includes various individuals. b. Ensure
the dataset covers a diverse set of finger vein patterns and conditions. c. Consider
using a high-resolution infrared imaging system for vein pattern acquisition.
2. Preprocessing
a. Image Enhancement: - Apply preprocessing techniques to enhance the contrast
and clarity of vein patterns. - Techniques may include histogram equalization,
adaptive filtering, or other enhancement methods.
b. Noise Reduction: - Use filtering techniques to reduce noise in the images. -
Gaussian or median filtering can be considered depending on the characteristics
of the images.
3. ROI Extraction
a. Locate the Region of Interest (ROI) in the finger vein image. b. Crop the image
to focus on the area containing the vein patterns.
4. Vein Pattern Extraction
a. Apply a suitable vein pattern extraction technique. Common methods include: -
Gabor filtering: Suitable for capturing texture patterns in the vein structure. -
Hessian matrix-based filtering: Enhances vessel-like structures in the image.
5. Feature Extraction
a. Identify key anatomical features of vein patterns. Possible features include: -
Bifurcation points: Points where veins split into two branches. - Crossing points:
Points where veins cross each other. - Curvature: Measure the curvature of vein
segments.
6. Feature Vector Representation
a. Construct a feature vector using the extracted features for each finger vein
image. b. Normalize the feature vectors to ensure consistency in scale and
magnitude.
7. Classification
a. Choose a suitable classification algorithm. Common methods include: -
Support Vector Machines (SVM) - k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) - Neural
Networks
8. Training and Testing
a. Split the dataset into training and testing sets. b. Train the classification model
using the training set. c. Evaluate the model's performance on the testing set.
9. Validation
a. Validate the results using a separate validation dataset, if available. b. Assess
the system's robustness and generalization to new data.
10. Performance Evaluation
a. Use metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to evaluate the
recognition system's performance.
11. Implementation in MATLAB
a. Implement the entire methodology using MATLAB scripts or functions. b.
Ensure code efficiency and optimization for real-time or near real-time
processing.
12. Results and Analysis
a. Present the results of the finger vein recognition system. b. Analyze any
challenges or limitations encountered during the process.
13. Conclusion
a. Summarize the methodology's effectiveness and its potential applications. b.
Discuss future improvements and research directions.

FASILITIES REQUIRED
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1]. K. Shaheed, A. Mao, I. Qureshi, M. Kumar, Q. Abbas, I. Ullah, and X. Zhang (2021). A
systematic review on physiological-based biometric recognition systems: Current and
future trends Arch Compute. Methods Eng., vol. 28, pp. 4917–4960.
[2]. J. Peng, N. Wang, A. A. A. El-Latif, Q. Li, and X. Niu (2020). Finger-vein verification using
Gabor filter and SIFT feature matching in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Intell. Inf. Hiding Multimedia
Signal Process., pp. 45–48.
[3]. B. A. Rosdi, W. S. Chai, and S. A. Suandi (2020). Finger vein recognition using local line
binary pattern Sensors, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 11357–11371.
[4]. L. Yang, G. Yang, X. Xi, X. Meng, C. Zhang, and Y. Yin (2019). Tri-branch vein structure
assisted finger vein recognition IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 21020–21028.
[5]. L. Yang, G. Yang, Y. Yin, and X. Xi (2018). Finger vein recognition with anatomy structure
analysis IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1892–1905.
[6]. A. Krishnan, T. Thomas, and D. Mishra (2021). Finger vein pulsation-based biometric
recognition IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, vol. 16, pp. 5034–5044.
[7]. G. R. Nayar, T. Thomas, and S. Emmanuel (2021). Graph based secure cancelable palm vein
biometrics J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 62, Art. no. 102991.
[8]. C. B. Yu, H. F. Qin, and Y. Z. Cui (2019). Finger-vein image recognition combining modified
Hausdorff distance with minutiae feature matching Interdiscipline. Sci. Compute. Life Sci.,
vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 280–289.
[9]. K.-Q. Wang, A. S. Khisa, X.-Q. Wu, and Q.-S. Zhao (2018). Finger vein recognition using LBP
variance with global matching,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Wavelet Anal. Pattern Recognit., pp.
196–201.
[10]. H. Faulds and W. J. Herschel (2019). Dactylography Origin Finger-Printing. Cambridge, U.K.:
Cambridge Univ. Press, pp 380-415.
[11]. A. Krishnan, G. R. Nayar, T. Thomas, and N. A. Nystrom (2020). FEBA an anatomy based
finger vein classification in Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conf. Biometrics (IJCB), pp. 1–9.
[12]. A. Krishnan, T. Thomas, G. R. Nayar, and S. S. Mohan (2018). Liveness detection in finger
vein imaging device using plethysmographic signals in Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Hum. Comput.
Interact. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 251–260.