CFA 3.3 Notes
CFA 3.3 Notes
STUDY SESSION 7
Expansive MP Restrictive MP
Expansive FP YC steep, economy likely to grow YC flat, economy less clear
Restrictive FP YC moderately steep, economy less clear YC inverted, economy likely to contract
8. Economic Growth Trends
a. Long-term trend growth rate (stable in developed, less predictable in emerging)
i. Population growth and demographics
ii. Business investment and productivity
iii. Healthy banking system
iv. Reasonable government policies
v. Shocks: war, accounting scandals, collapses
b. Long-term stability: related with consumer spending
i. Wealth effect: amplify swings in business cycle
ii. Permanent income hypothesis: spending driven by LR income expecations, countercyclical
behavior.
c. Focus: labor, capital, TFP
d. Implications for capital markets
i. High rates in capital investment
ii. Not necessarily linked to favorable equity returns, as its related to return on capital
iii. Structural government policies
1. Sound fiscal policy
a. Twin defict problem: government budget and current account deficits
b. Outcomes: borrowing stop, cutback in spending, currency devalue, print money,
excessive domestic borrowing, detrimental to real growth
2. Minimal government interference in free markets
3. Facilitate competition in private sector
4. Development of infrastructure and human capital
5. Sound tax policies
e. Exogenous shocks
i. Unanticipated events, outside normal course. Not alreddy built in prices
ii. Spread to others: contagion.
iii. Oil, financial crisis,
9. Links Between Economies
a. Macroeconomic links: convergence in business cycle, international trade and capital flows
b. Interest rates and currency exchange rates
i. Pegs: unilateral declaration of pegging to maintain exchange rate. Fluctuate with the markets
confidence in the peg. If lose confidence, increase ST rate to attract capital
ii. Relationship interest rate differentials and currency
1. If overvalued, rates higher to compensate
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
2. Relative bond yields increase with strong economic activity an increasing demand for
funds
3. Differences in nominal interest rates reflection of differences in inflation. As real rates
are equal.
10. Emerging Market Economies
a. Charactersitics
i. High returns, higher risk
ii. Require heavy investment in physical and human infrastructure, so foreign borrowing
iii. Unstable poltical and social systems
iv. Lack of a middle class
v. Heavily depnndent on commodities, undivserified nature
vi. Bond investor: credit risk. Euqity investor: gorwh tprospets and risk
b. Questions (unhealthy if)
Responsible fiscal and monetary policies? Deficit/GDP >4% buildup debt >70%
Expected growth? <4%, no govt regulation
Stable, appropriate currency value? Current account deficit >4%
Country too highly levered? Foreign debt of GDP (>50% overlevered, >200% high risk)
Level of FX reserves relative to ST debt? FX reserves < foreign debt paid off in one year
Govt stance regarding structural reform? Supportive to structural reforms, more hospitable for investment
11. Economic Forecasting
Cash instruments If rates set to rise, reduce term. IF economy improve, lower-rated instruments
Credit rf bonds ST horizon: cyclical changes economy and changes in ST r
Higher growth = greater demand, higher inflation = higher yields
Change in ST rate = increase rates, but may fall if slowdown economy
Credit risky bonds Recession: credit risk premium increases, default more likely, CP dries up, higher yields
Emerging market govt bonds Hard currency, higher default risk
Inflation-Indexed bonds Yield rises as real economy expands
Falls as inflation accelerates
Changes with supply and demand
Common Stock Earnings depend on growth. ST growth affected by business cycle.
Noncyclical / defensive stocks: less affected, lower risk premiums and higher valuation
Stock valuation: P/E, higher in early expansion, with ow inflation results, expecting to
recover.
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
Emerging market stocks Positively correlated with business cycles in developed world - Trade and capital flows
Real Estate Affected by interest rates, inflation , shape of Y and consumption. Interest rates affect
demand and supply.
13. Forecasting Exchange rates
a. Supply and demand, tradef and capital flows.
b. Methods of forecasting
Purchasing power parity (PPP) Differences in inflation reflected in exchange rate. Higher inflation will see currency
value decline. Holds LT (>5Y)
Relative Economic Strength Favorable investment climate, increase currency’s value. High ST rates attract investors
Capital flows approach LT capital flows. Complicates relationship between ST rates and currency value, cu
might promote growth.
Savings investment Why currencies diverge form equilibrium for extended periods.
imbalances I>S, capital must flow to finance. To attract capital domestic currency must increase
Equity Market Valuation
Cobb Douglas
Solow residual
H-model
STUDY SESSION 8
1. Investment Governance
a. Ensures informed decisions, oversight, improve performance
b. Effective investment governance models
i. LT and ST objectives
1. Pension fund (Assets=Liabilities), Endowment (rate>required), Individual (retirement)
2. Return requirement, willingness/ability to tolerate risk, obligations, liquidity
ii. Rights and responsibilities
1. Depends on size, internal staff, knowledge, skills and abilities. Resource availability
iii. IPS
1. Investor characteristics, objectives, willingness to accept risk, constraints, duties,
allocation rights and responsibilities, guidelines: asset types.
iv. Strategic asset allocation
1. IPs, time horizon, risk/return asset allocations, specify rebalancing
v. Reporting framework to monitor
1. Evaluate performance, guideline compliance, program’s progress, current status
vi. Governance audit
1. Third party, minimize decision-reversal risk, provide durability evaluating turnover.
2. Economic Balance Sheet (EBS)
a. EBS: financial and non-financial assets and liabilities
b. Extended portfolio A/L: PV of expected earnings (Human Capital), PV of pension income, PV of expected
intellectual royalties, PV of expected consumption, PV of foundations payouts
c. Life-cycle balanced fund: changing levels of human and financial capital.
3. Asset Allocation Approaches
1. Mean-variance optimization
a. Diversified portfolio requires: asset allocation decision, implementation decision
b. Efficient frontier with subset of suitable assets
c. No assumes rf asset exists
d. U= E(Rm)-0.005*lambda*Varm
i. Lambda= preference for trading risk and return, unique to individual(1-10, av. 4, risk averse)
ii. Um =certainty-equivalent return.
iii. Constraints
1. Budget constraints Sum(w)=1
2. Non-negativity constraint 0<=w<=1
e. Criticism
i. GIGO: garbage-in-garbage-out
ii. Concentrated asset class allocations
iii. Skewness and kurtosis
iv. Risk diversification only for classes, not for sources of risk
v. Ignores liabilities
vi. Single-period framework
2. Address first 2 criticism (last one 3)
a. Improving quality of inputs
i. Reverse optimization
1. Assume optimal portfolio weighs, derivate returns, then MVO
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
2. Assume world market portfolio as starting point
3. Advantage: derived returns reflect diversified portfolio
ii. Black-Litterman model (extension)
1. Adjusted to reflect investors unique view
b. Adding more constraints (if too much not really optimizing)
i. Fixed allocation to assets
ii. Allocation range for asset class
iii. Upper limit to address liquidity issues
iv. Relative allocation between two or more classes
v. Liability-relative setting
c. Resampled MVO
i. MVO, Monte Carlo, Resampled efficient frontier as average of simulated frontiers
ii. Address limitation of MVO and help to identify risk tolerance level
d. Non-Normal distribution (Skewness and Kurtosis)
i. Include them in utility unction
ii. Use asymmetric definition of risk: VaR
3. Other adjustments
a. CF of human capital = inflation linked bond
b. Less certain and more volatile future wages = inflation linked bond + corporate bond
c. As human capital is not tradable, % allocation is fixed
d. Residential real state: real estate property index, allocation constrained to current value
4. Asset class liquidity
a. Less liquid asset classes, with liquidity premium difficult to include
i. Few indexes available
ii. Generally not investable as a passive alternative
b. To address this
i. Exclude illiquid asset
ii. Include illiquid asset and model the inputs of the specific investments you plan to use
iii. Include illiquid asset using highly diversified inputs, recognizing that actual investment may have
different characteristics
5. Risk budgets
a. Marginal contribution to portfolio risk (MCTR) = change in total portfolio risk for small change in asset
allocation to a specific asset class
i. See what happens with portfolio risk with changes in allocations
ii. Identify optimal allocations
iii. Develop risk budget
iv. MCTRi=Bi * SDp (Bi=beta asset classi with portfolio)
b. Absolute contribution to total risk (ACTR)
i. ACTRi = wi*MCTRi
c. %risk contributed = ACTRi/SDp
d. Optimal allocation: excess return/MCTR = in all asset classes = Sharpe
6. Incorporate clients risk preference
a. Additional cosntaitns
b. Risk aversion factor
c. MCS illustrate outcomes
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
7. Investment factors
a. Examples: market exposure, size, valuation, momentum, liquidity, duration, credit, volatility
b. Consistent with fundamental factor return models.
c. Factor are not highly correlated with each other
d. Resulting efficient frontiers form factors or asset classes are equal. Choice depends on how you form
capital market expectations
8. Liability-relative asset allocation (Pnesion liability)
a. Plan surplus = Market value of assets – PV of liabilities
b. Funding ratio = market value of assets/PV of liabilities
c. Value of assets and liabilities are driven of some of the same factors
9. Characteristics of liabilities
a. Fixed vs. contingent
b. Legal vs quasi legal
c. Duration and convexity
d. Liability value vs. size of sponsoring organization
e. Factors that affect future CF
f. Timing considerations, longevity risk
g. Regulations
10. Approaches to liability-relative asset allocation
a. Surplus optimization
i. Extension of MVO
ii. Rs,m=surplus return = ch(asset value)-ch(liability value)
iii. Um=E(Rs,m-0.005*lambda*Vars,m)
iv. Correlations reflect usefulness of assets to hedge liabilities.
v. Estimate R and Var of liabilities
1. Assumption = corporate bonds
2. Factor approach = common factors with assets
b. Two portfolio approach
i. Subportfolios: hedging and return-seeking
ii. Hedging: CF matching, duration matching or immunization
iii. Modifications for higher expecting returns.
1. Partially hedging, more capital to return-seeking
2. Increasing allocation for hedging as funding ratio increase
iv. Limitations:
1. If funding ratio<1, difficult to create a hedging portfolio
2. Hedging portfolio may not be available.
c. Integrated asset-liability approach
i. Joint optimization method
ii. Feedback loop, multiperiod model
iii. Banks to identify optimal mix A/L ot meet return and risk objectives
11. Goals-based approach
a. N of objectives, different time horizons and levels of urgency (specified required prob of success)
b. Subportoflios: each goal address individually, minimum expectations for each goal
c. Differences in risk/return, liquidity, asset classes.
d. Highest expected return with specified prob of success over time horizon
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
e. Size = PV of future goal discounted at expected return
12. Heuristic / ad hoc approaches of allocation
a. 120 – Age (go to Fixed-income, as value of human capital declines as we age)
b. 60/40 split (stock/fixed income)
c. Endowment Model or Yale Model (larger amounts of alternative investment, less-than perfectly
informationally efficient, capacity to outperform, popular for university endowment funds)
d. Risk parity (diversification each asset class contributes the same amount to the total portfolio risk, focus
on risk not return)
e. 1/N rule (rebalance to equally weighted each quarter)
STUDY SESSION 9
1. Introduction
a. Base currency: denominator price in terms of the numerator. Buy and sell refer to base currency
b. Bid/asked rules: smaller number first.
c. Spot vs. fwd: spot = immediate settle, fwd= date for delayed settle, forward quote directly on in points.
(depends on how spot is quoted)
d. Offsetting transactions and mark to market: Mark the position to market value, PV(gain/loss), offsetting
contract position.
e. FX swap: rolls over a maturing fwd contract using a spot transaction into a new fwd contract.
f. Currency option basics call on one currency is put on the other
The call option to buy the base currency The put option to sell the base currency
From 0 to X OTM rising in value. 0 to 0.5 ITM falling in value. -1 to -0.5
On X ATM, delta=0.5 ATM, delta=-0.5
From X, upward ITM, rising in value. 0.5 to 1 OTM falling in value -0.5 to 0
2. Effects of currency on portfolio risk and return
a. Concepts
i. Domestic currency: currency of the investor
ii. Domestic asset: denominated in domestic currency
iii. Foreign currency: foreign asset in other currency
iv. Foreign-currency return: return measured in foreign currency R(FC)
v. %change in value of foregin currency R(FX)
b. Foreign asset priced in a foreign currency have two sources of risk
i. R(FX)
ii. R(FC)
iii. So: R(DC)=(1+R(FC))*(1+R(FX))-1 = R(FC)+R(FX)+R(FC)*R(FX)
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
3. Calculating portfolio return for multiple investments in foreign assets
a. R(DC)=sum(wi*R(DCi))
4. Risk
a. Two sources of risk
Action
Relative currency Appreciate Reduce hedge, increase long position
Depreciate Increase hedge, decrease long position
Volatility Rising Long straddle (buy ATM put and call = buying vol) or strangle (moderate payoffs,
require larger movement in the currency, cost less)
Falling Short straddle or strangle
Market conditions Stable A carry trade
Crisis Discontinue carry trade.
e. Subtle variations
i. Carry trade with bundle of funding, not equally weighted
ii. Delta neutral position: tilted to net + or – based on managers view
7. Currency management tools
a. Currency exposure needs to be hedge?
b. Easier if quote with foreign bas currency
c. Statements or directions refer to base currency.
d. Buying or selling base currency
e. Hedging is not free
i. Fwds: no initial cost, high opportunity cost
ii. Options: high initial cost, retains upside
iii. Lowering the cost of the hedge: less downside protection or upside potential
1. Writing options
2. Adjusting strike
3. Adjusting sixe
4. Exotic features
f. Discretionary hedging: deviate from policy neutral hedge, increase risk underperformance
g. IPS: define strategic, policy natural hedge position
h. Fwd are preferred
i. Customized
ii. Available for any currency pair
iii. Future contracts require margin
iv. Trading volume, better liquidity
i. Static (held to maturity) or dynamic hedge (rebalance). Choice depend
i. ST contracts or dynamic hedges with more frequent rebalancing: increase costs but improve
hedge results
ii. Higher risk aversion: more frequent rebalancing
iii. Lower risk aversion: strong manager views
j. Mismatch FX swap, near spot leg and far fwd leg not equal size
8. Roll yield
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
a. Return form movement of the fwd price over time toward the spot price
b. Produces profit/loss
i. Fwd premium or discount
ii. Purchase or sold
c. Roll yield (held to expiration) = (initial fwd – spot ptrice) / initial spot
d. Will affect cost/benfit analysis. Is a cost of hedging
i. Positive roll yield: prefer hedging.
1. Benchmark
a. Reference point, evaluate performance
b. Valid:
i. Specified in advance
ii. Appropriate
iii. Measurable
iv. Unambiguous
v. Reflective of the mangers current investment opinions
vi. Accountable
vii. Investable
c. Investment uses of benchmarks
i. Reference point
ii. Communication
iii. How the manger wishes to be viewed
iv. Clearly specifying risk exposures
v. Performance attribution
vi. Manager selection
vii. Marketing
viii. Compliance, laws and regulations
d. Types of benchmarks
i. Asset-based benchmarks (focus on return of assets)
1. Absolute return: minimum return or spread
2. Manager universe or peer group: outperform the median manager
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
3. Broad market index
4. Investment style
5. Factor-based models: set weight of factors
6. Return-based: factor are subgroups of asset returns and sensitivities
7. Custom: reflect managers style
ii. Liability based benchmarks (objective: fund payments at low risk)
2. Index
a. Performance of a group of securities
b. Use of market indexes
i. Asset allocation proxies
ii. Investment management mandates
iii. Performance benchmarks
iv. Portfolio analysis
v. Gauging market sentiment
vi. As an investment
c. Index construction (rules)
i. Completeness vs. investability
1. Include all securities: complete coverage and diversification, but inclusion of smaller cap
and less liquid securities
ii. Reconstitution and rebalance frequency vs. turnover
1. Reconstitution: adding/deleting securities, rebalancing: adjusting weighting
2. Frequent better reflects characteristics, but increased turnover and transaction costs
iii. Objective and transparent rules vs. judgement
d. Pros and cons of approaches to index weighting
STUDY SESSION 10
Pure indexing Replicate bond index, exactly match all risk factors, allowing security selection
Enhanced indexing Additional flexibility, add active return. Duration still matched to index (<50bp)
Active management Much larger deviations, seeks greater act return (>50bp)
3. Bond liquidity
a. Liquidity: ability to make transactions in large size, quickly in with minimal deviation.
b. Issues leading to illiquidity
i. Large number of issues
ii. OTC, find counterparty, transaction less transparent
c. Less liquid issues: trade at higher yield, liquidity premium
d. Varies by subsector
i. On-the-run high-quality sovg govt: high, decline somewhat for off-the-run
ii. Corporate bond, declines with lower quality (as riskier and smaller size)
e. Effects of liquidity on bond portfolio management
i. Pricing data: infrequent trading = out-of-date trade prices, so matrix pricing
ii. Portfolio construction: buy-and-hold, less need for liquidity, so select in exchange of higher yield.
iii. Less liquid bonds: higher bid-ask spreads
f. Alternatives to direct investment in bonds.
i. Derivatives: futures and interest rate swaps.
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
ii. Exchange traded funds (ETF): easily traded and high liquidity
4. Modeling expected return
a. Income yield: Coupon/Price
b. Rolldown return: Assumes yield curve is unchanged. (end horizon period projected price – beginning
price) / beginning rprice
c. Expected price change: bsed on ivnestors expected change in ield and spread. –
MD*chg(Y)+1/2C*chng(Y^2)
d. Credit losses: Probability of default times epceted loss severity
e. Expected gains or losses vs. investors currency
5. Leveraging returns
a. Leverage: increase return, attractive at lower interest rates.
i. If Rinv > Rborrow, leverage enhance portfolio return, but increase exposure to interest rate ris.
ii. Borrowing normally done in ST interest rate, and those cost can increase faster
iii. Leveraged portfolio Dassets> Dliabilities
iv. Leverage portfolio return = Rinv = (Vb/Ve) * (Rinv-Rborrow)
b. Multiple ways to achieve leverage
i. Repurchase agreements (Repo)
1. Sell a security for cash, and agree to buy it back in a future date.
2. Loan term often overnight, renegotiated next day at new interest rate.
3. General collateral: not specified actual securities
4. Haircut amount provides additional security to the money lender. Haircut is larger for
riskier and less liquid securities
5. Can be bilateral or tri-party (intermediate, holds collateral and record exchange of
ownership)
6. Cash driven or security driven (money lender wants temporary possession of specific
collateral)
ii. Future contracts
1. Small initials margin deposit, but full upside/downside of buying
2. Contract price* multiplier = full price
3. Leverage = (notional value of contract – margin amount) / Margin amount
iii. Swap agreements
1. Receive-fixed swap increase portfolio exposure to bond market with no explicit
investment.
iv. Structured finance instruments: inverse floater.
v. Securities lending:
1. Supports short-selling, must borrow the security form someone else. Receive cash and
invest it.
2. Rebate rate: collateral earnings rate – security lending rate
3. Usually open ended, no specific maturity and continue until one counterparty requires
settlement: additional risk.
4. Earnings depend on how badly securities borrower needs that collateral.
c. Risks created by leverage
i. Interest rate increases, value of portfolio and collateral declines, induce money lender for
repayment, force liquidate, fire sale, distressed conditions, vicious cycle.
6. Managing Taxable and Tax-exempt Portfolios
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
a. Tax issues examples
i. Income, capital gains = when realized but different rates. Zero-coupon bonds, imputed income
may be taxed each year
ii. Capital gains tax (only at sale) < Interest Income tax
iii. Capital gains tax (LT) < (ST)
iv. Capital losses only allow to offset capital gains r future realized losses.
v. Tax-sheltered or tax-advantaged accounts.
b. Strategies with taxable accounts
i. Realize capital losses to offset gains
ii. Extend holding periods to realize LT capital gains
iii. Extend holding period to defer taxes
iv. Consider differentials between income vs. gain tax rates
c. Taxes in mutual funds
i. Income on the underlying, taxable.
ii. Options on G/L
1. G/L passed through and taxed when realized
2. G/L realized within the fund, affect when investor sells fund shares
1. Definitions
a. Asset-liability management (ALM): strategies that consider assets in relation to liabilities
b. Liability-driven investment (LDI): liability as a given, and manage assets to meet liabilities
c. Asset-driven-investing (ADI): assets as a given, and manages liabilities in relation to assets
2. Types of liability-driven investing (LDI)
Type I Known future amount and payout dates Option-free fixed rate bond Simple duration
Type II Known future amount, uncertain payout dates Callable/Puttable bond
Type III Uncertain future amount, known payout dates Floating rate / TIPS Effective duration
Type IV Uncertain future amount and payout dates Property and Casualty
3. Immunizing a single liability
a. Immunization: minimize variability of rate of return, FV confidently predicted.
b. Cash flow matching: simples but least flexible
c. Duration matching
i. Macaulay duration: balance price risk = reinvestment risk. Assumes parallel movement
ii. Modified duration: more accurate, more appropriate for some techniques.
iii. Money duration: = MD*V*0.0001
d. Portfolio statistics should be use
i. Flat yield curve: no difference
ii. Upward-sloping yield curve: portfolio Dur and IRR > weighted average of bonds.
e. Goal: earn the initial portfolio IRR, not the average YTM of the bonds.
f. Structural risk: dispersion (related with convexity)
i. Conv = (Dmac^2+Dmac+Disp) / (1+IRRperiodic)
ii. Conv/Disp: Risk exposure of the immunization strategy to structural risk from shifts and twists in
the yield curve
iii. Structural Risk: IRR doesn’t match yield of the replicating zero or insufficient to fund liability
g. Effects of yield curve changes | Duration matching (Barbell portfolio) have Structural risk
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
i. Parallel move
1. outperform, positive convexity effect (be parallel is sufficient, but not necessary)
2. Zero replication: risks are low, but not risk free
3. Does not mean buy and hold, to maintain immunization: rebalance
ii. Steepening twist: Barbell underperform. PVA<PVL
iii. Flattening twist: Barbell outperform. PVA>PVL
iv. Positive butterfly twist: Barbell underperform PVA<PVL
v. Negative butterfly twist: Barbell outperform. PVA>PVL
h. Rules for immunizing
i. PVA >= PVL
ii. DA=DL
iii. Minimize portfolio convexity
iv. Regularly rebalance the portfolio
4. Immunizing multiple liabilities
a. Cash flow matching
i. Safest approach.
ii. Accounting defeasance: assets legally set aside, dedicated to meet liabilities, remove from BS
iii. Match stream of liabilities using coupon-bearing bonds in a recursive fashion.
iv. Cash-in-advance constraint, expose to reinvestment risk.
b. Duration matching
i. More flexible and practical
ii. Sufficient assets to fund liability,
iii. PVA>=PVL, so match BPVA=BPVL
iv. Asset dispersion/convexity > liabilities (not too much, minimize structural risk exposure)
v. Regularly rebalance
c. Derivatives overlay
i. Futures. Seller must deliver CTD bond (Cheapest to deliver) | buyer mst pay initial contract price
multiplied by conversion factor.
ii. CTD determines duration and BPV.
iii. Futures BVP = BPV(CTD)/CF(CFD)
iv. Number of contracts = N = (BVP(Liabilities)-BVP(portfolio)) / BPV(futures)
d. Contingent immunization
i. Hybrid active/passive strategy, requires significant surplus
ii. Examples
1. Invest all in stocks
2. Invest only the surplus and balance in a immunized portfolio.
3. Active bond management techniques: Rates will increase, under hedge | rates will
decrease, over hedge
iii. Vulnerable to liquidity risk
5. LDI strategies applied to a pension fund
a. Pension funds: Type IV liabilities.
b. Types
i. Futures
1. creates operational and practical risks, margin must be posted daily
2. Successful hedge: G/L offset to changes in liability, but as an unrealized value.
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
3. 100% hedge rare
ii. Interest rate swaps
1. Avoid cash flow issues of futures.
2. Received fixed swap = buying more bond assets and increase portfolio duration.
3. Pay fixed swap = reduce duration
4. Many swaps now require periodic marking to market and posting margin to reduce
counterparty and credit risk, some practical CF complications.
iii. Swaption
1. Initial premium for the right to enter a swap.
2. Receive swaption: need to increase BPV, right to initiate a receive-fixed at a prespecified
swap fixed rate (SFR), swaption strike rate
a. If SFR declines, the right has positive value, increases BPV of assets
b. If SFR increase, the right has no value, worthless
iv. Swaption Collar
1. Buying one swaption and selling another.
2. Buy receive swaption = benefit if SFR declines
3. Sell payer swaption: reduce initial premium, limit future benefits
6. Choosing an optimal strategy
a. Depends on managers view of interest rates.
b. Choices
i. Receive-fixed swap vs. pay LIBOR (if r<r*)
ii. Receiver swaption(if r>r(ps) )
iii. Zero-cost collar: buying receive swaption, selling payer swaption (if r*<r<r(ps)
7. Liability-driven investing risks
a. Hedge amounts = approx. based on assumed durations and ignore convexity
b. Duration = parallel shifts
c. Twists of yield curve = structural risk. Asset convexity > liability convexity, and imitate dispersion
d. Model risk can be significant
e. Measurement error
f. Futures BPV calculations based on a CTD bond. Adjust for accrued interest discounted at St rates.
g. Portfolio yield <> liability discount rate, different risk levels = spread risk
i. Liability discount rate = corporate debt rates | Portfolio yield = govt bond rates
ii. Treasury rates: subtle risk, highly liquid, higher reported volatility, higher rate of change.
iii. Swaps creates spread risks as reflects LIBOR market
h. OTC derivatives have counterparty risk. Requiring collateral reduces counterparty risk, but creates cash
flow risk.
i. Asset liquidity risk
8. Bond indexes
a. Low cost diversification. Alternative to active fixed-income management. Goal to minimize tracking error.
b. Approaches
i. Pure index, full replication = holding securities
ii. Enhanced indexing: matches primary risk exposures
c. Indexing bonds more difficult than equity
i. Much larger, more issues, characteristics vary.
ii. One issuer = multiples issues. Differ substantially in liquidity
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
iii. Most bond trading is done OTC. Capital requirements, high capital cost, reduce willingness to
hold inventories, increase bid-ask spread, low liquidity
iv. Many transactions not publically reported, difficult to obtain data, so evaluated pricing. If
features are more unusual, more difficult to find appropriate traded bond to use
d. Matching primary risk factors
STUDY SESSION 11
Credit strategies
Bottom-up Top-down
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
Easier information advantage Harder information advantage
Focus on least efficient sectors Problem: same factors examined by many others
Work best comparing bonds with homogenous credit risk
exposure
Problem: macro factors can overwhelm Advantage: focus directly to macro factors
Combine: overwight undervalue/ underweight overvalue, Macro factors, then individual security analysis
adjust for macro factor exposure
5. Bottom-up in detail
a. Identify universe, divide by sectors, match benchmark wights, over/underweight securities.
b. Look for misevaluation, weight compensation vs. credit risks.
c. Gather information: default rates, loss rates, past spread relationships
d. Estimated excess of return (EXR) = (s*t)-(ch(s)*SD)-(t*p*L)
i. S= spread, t= period, SD: spread duration, p=prob of default, L=severity of loss
e. Select highest XR. Exceptions: need diversify, emphasize high liquidity
f. Spread curves
i. Liquidity
ii. Date of issuance
iii. Pending new supply
iv. Seniority in bankruptcy
v. Size of issue and total issuance outstanding by issuer
g. Practical considerations
i. Identifying optimal exposures and best relative value holdings
ii. Exposure to credit risk: spread duration and market value
1. IG: SD and duration contribution
2. HY: high default risk, market value allocation is more relevant
iii. Best relative value:
1. Move down his relative value list
2. Invest in suitable index fund
3. Hold cash until available
6. Top-down in detail
a. Focus on macro factors: strength growth and corporate profits
b. Uses
i. Identify when to focus in HY vs. IG
ii. Identify sectors
c. Focus on historical patterns: credit cycle (variations growth and default rates, negatively correlated),
credit spread (default rates and spreads highly correlated)
d. How portfolio average quality is calculated:
i. Numeric sequence, average of rating. This can understate exposure to credit risk, because
default rates and losses increase rapidly with rating declines
ii. Non-arithmetic portfolio averages: exposure to credit risk increase at faster than linear rate, as
bond rating declines.
e. Duration time spread (DTS): Spread duration (how impact value and Spread (greater exposure to credit
risky asset)
f. Historical spreads between credit risky sectors to assess relative attractiveness
7. Adjusting the credit portfolios interest rate risk
a. Top-down: more likely to actively manage interest rate risk
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
b. Bottom-up: match interest rate exposure, focus on security selection
c. Difficult to manage interest rate and credit risk without derivatives
i. View: spreads narrow, rates increase. Buying corporates for increase spread exposure, selling
bond futures to lower duration.
ii. Adjusting exposure to options. Difficult: with callable and putable bonds. Straightforward:
options
iii. Currency forwards and bond futures adjust currency and duration exposures
d. ESG considerations (environmental social and governance)
8. Managing liquidity risk
a. In a crisis
i. Daily trading volume down
ii. Credit spread sensitive to flow of funds.
iii. Larger impact on HY as smaller and less liquid
iv. Difference in bid-ask less reliable.
v. Capital and risk consideration reduced the size of dealer’s inventory.
vi. Broader distribution: favorable trend to liquidly. Greater number and dispersion of participants:
resilient and more liquid
b. Managing liquidity risk
i. Hold cash
ii. Hold liquid securities
iii. Use liquid derivatives instruments: regularly traded CDS
iv. Use IG or HY ETFs as temporary investment
9. Managing tail risk
a. Tail risk: more large declines, difficult to model or anticipate
b. Quantify potential losses
i. Scenario analysis
ii. Historical scenarios
iii. Hypothetical scenarios
c. Severe adverse market conditions:
i. Correlation upward
ii. Diversification benefits declines
iii. Downside risk greater
iv. Liquidity declines or disappear
d. Is difficult
i. Quantify the risk and hold adequate top quality securities to retain liquidity
ii. Identify tail risks and hold securities likely to benefit when risk occurs
iii. Tail risk hedges: CDS, credit spread options. Problem: cost incurred at purchase, more the
marketplace believes the risk is likely, most expensive the protection
10. International credit risks
a. International investing
i. greater relative value opportunities.
ii. New issuance may exceed desired demand
iii. Subtle quality differences may exist
b. EM bond sector similar in size to US HY sector. But differences, EM sector:
i. Commodity and banking related business.
Carlos Calderon Gonzalez
ii. Direct government ownership in companies is high: explicit/implicit expectation of support, legal
right for foreign investors less clear
iii. Rating for non-govt understates true quality as cap is govt.
c. Global bond portfolios
i. Liquidity greater concern
ii. Currency risk
iii. Legal risk
11. Structure finance instruments
a. Offer a combination of
i. Higher yield and expected return
ii. Tailored risk exposure, multiple tranches
iii. Exposure to specific market sectors
iv. Diversification benefit
b. Multiple types
i. MBS: pools of mortgage backed loans. Compared to corporate bonds
1. Govt agency backed MBS: similar yields and spread, greater trading volume, liquidity
2. Tailored exposure to specific segments of real estate market.
3. Adjusting portfolio exposure to interest rate volatility. Prepay option = embedded short
call option. But MBS market is larger, more liquid, less default risk.
a. Increasing rates or higher rate vol, prepay option becomes more valuable.
ii. Asset-backed securities (ABSs): backed by non-mortgage debt.
1. Different source: return and diversification
iii. Collateralized debt obligation (CDOs): various form of debt obligation, structured in tranches.
1. Credit quality descends and expected return increases as you move down to trancehs.
2. Little diversification but:
a. opportunities to identify relative value
b. express a view on correlation within underlying collateral
i. +1 buy lower tranches, as same prob of default
ii. -1 highest tranches, as some collateral must be paid.
c. Leverage exposure to credit risk
iv. Covered bonds: issued by a financial entity, form of collateralized debt. General obligation of
issuer, lower risk investment than general bonds.