Ndoga Analysis 2012
Ndoga Analysis 2012
Another voice that encapsulates the extent of Africa’s wealth, says that “the enor-
mous resources in Africa makes it one of the wealthiest regions in the world ... In
most parts of the continent, it is possible to engage in farming all year round. Af-
rica could easily be a paradise on earth” Adadevoh (2006:58). Rukuni (2011:208-
9) sheds some light on the significance of the agricultural potential which con-
tributes an estimated 35% of the Gross National Product while employing up to
80% of the total labour and accounting for 40% of the total foreign exchange.
He equally posits agriculture, the backbone of the African economy, as seriously
102 103
The greatest tragedy of our time is that one sixth of humanity is not Ayittey substantiates his reasoning by showing that even though there are a few
even on the development ladder. A large number of the extreme poor political-economic success stories in the post-independent era in Africa, these are
are caught in a poverty trap, unable on their own to escape from overshadowed by the tragedies in the majority of current situations (2009:37-38).
extreme material deprivation. They are trapped by disease, physical For example, he says that only 16 out of 54 countries in Africa can be described
isolation, climate stress, environmental degradation, and by extreme as democratic, and only eight have reasonably free and independent media and
poverty itself. Even if solutions exist to increase their chances for only two countries have consistent levels of economic growth sufficient to keep
survival – whether in the form of new farming techniques, or es- up with population growth (2009:43). By the same token, despite the aid amount-
sential medicines, or bed nets that can limit the transmission of ma- ing to a staggering $460 billion that Africa has received since 1960 the donors
laria – these families and their governments simply lack the financial have not bothered to be introspective about the outcome of their efforts (2009:37).
means to make these crucial investments. Ayittey is right in pointing out these anomalies. He goes on to prescribe pos-
sible solutions when he surmises that “the African people, through African so-
In making this call Sachs is adamant that if all is done that could be done with ciety groups, need to be empowered to monitor how aid money is spent and to
the available resources, this seemingly colossal task to eradicate extreme poverty instigate reform from within” (2009:45). He goes on to qualify how this action
can be achieved. For the remainder of Africa’s underprivileged, poverty can be could be done when he specifies that “empowerment requires arming the African
described as a disposition particularly in view of the resources at their disposal. people with the information, the freedom and the institutional means to unchain
If almost anywhere else in the world regions there has been economic progress, themselves from the vicious grip of poverty and oppression” (2009:45). From
this fact suggests that Africa cannot be an exception. Adadevoh (2006:50) says reading his book, The End of Poverty: How to Make it Happen in Our Lifetime
that “situations hardly change for the better by themselves; they are changed (2005), Sachs would undoubtedly endorse these initiatives, and so would other
through the determined efforts of change agents”. The leading objective for the proponents for the eradication of extreme poverty such as Julian May (2000),
104 105
The greatest tragedy of our time is that one sixth of humanity is not Ayittey substantiates his reasoning by showing that even though there are a few
even on the development ladder. A large number of the extreme poor political-economic success stories in the post-independent era in Africa, these are
are caught in a poverty trap, unable on their own to escape from overshadowed by the tragedies in the majority of current situations (2009:37-38).
extreme material deprivation. They are trapped by disease, physical For example, he says that only 16 out of 54 countries in Africa can be described
isolation, climate stress, environmental degradation, and by extreme as democratic, and only eight have reasonably free and independent media and
poverty itself. Even if solutions exist to increase their chances for only two countries have consistent levels of economic growth sufficient to keep
survival – whether in the form of new farming techniques, or es- up with population growth (2009:43). By the same token, despite the aid amount-
sential medicines, or bed nets that can limit the transmission of ma- ing to a staggering $460 billion that Africa has received since 1960 the donors
laria – these families and their governments simply lack the financial have not bothered to be introspective about the outcome of their efforts (2009:37).
means to make these crucial investments. Ayittey is right in pointing out these anomalies. He goes on to prescribe pos-
sible solutions when he surmises that “the African people, through African so-
In making this call Sachs is adamant that if all is done that could be done with ciety groups, need to be empowered to monitor how aid money is spent and to
the available resources, this seemingly colossal task to eradicate extreme poverty instigate reform from within” (2009:45). He goes on to qualify how this action
can be achieved. For the remainder of Africa’s underprivileged, poverty can be could be done when he specifies that “empowerment requires arming the African
described as a disposition particularly in view of the resources at their disposal. people with the information, the freedom and the institutional means to unchain
If almost anywhere else in the world regions there has been economic progress, themselves from the vicious grip of poverty and oppression” (2009:45). From
this fact suggests that Africa cannot be an exception. Adadevoh (2006:50) says reading his book, The End of Poverty: How to Make it Happen in Our Lifetime
that “situations hardly change for the better by themselves; they are changed (2005), Sachs would undoubtedly endorse these initiatives, and so would other
through the determined efforts of change agents”. The leading objective for the proponents for the eradication of extreme poverty such as Julian May (2000),
104 105
106 107
106 107
2.1 Text and Exegetical Framework 6:6-11 Second, we note that in typical Instruction fashion we have a predominant use of
The framework reflected here follows the natural division of the poem where the the imperative in the opening statement, some four times in total. The addressee
first half, 6:6-8, describes the industry of the ant as an object lesson. The second usually indicated by the vocative “my son” (cf. 5:1, 7; 6:1, 20; 7:1), however,
half, 6:9-11 focuses on the sluggard to whom the object lesson applies. Verse 11 is replaced with the double vocative, “sluggard” in 6:6 and 9, perhaps because
provides some form of closure. These divisions can be represented as Instruction of the repulsiveness of the subject. There is some sarcasm in the request for the
6:6-8, Admonition 6:9-10, and Consequence 6:11, as shown below: “sluggard” to learn from the “ant” a feminine singular noun in this case. Hubbard
(1989:99) picks up on the sarcasm by projecting a 5ft plus and some 130 pound
in weight sluggard being told to let an ant, less than a quarter of an inch long and
weighing a slight fraction of an ounce, be the teacher. He continues that “a person
with gifts of speech, with a brain the size of a whole anthill is told to bend over
and peer down, and learn from the lowly ant. The irony is powerful” (1989:99)
cf. Ross (1991:932).
Third, and closely related to the above, is the significance of the feminine con-
108 109
2.1 Text and Exegetical Framework 6:6-11 Second, we note that in typical Instruction fashion we have a predominant use of
The framework reflected here follows the natural division of the poem where the the imperative in the opening statement, some four times in total. The addressee
first half, 6:6-8, describes the industry of the ant as an object lesson. The second usually indicated by the vocative “my son” (cf. 5:1, 7; 6:1, 20; 7:1), however,
half, 6:9-11 focuses on the sluggard to whom the object lesson applies. Verse 11 is replaced with the double vocative, “sluggard” in 6:6 and 9, perhaps because
provides some form of closure. These divisions can be represented as Instruction of the repulsiveness of the subject. There is some sarcasm in the request for the
6:6-8, Admonition 6:9-10, and Consequence 6:11, as shown below: “sluggard” to learn from the “ant” a feminine singular noun in this case. Hubbard
(1989:99) picks up on the sarcasm by projecting a 5ft plus and some 130 pound
in weight sluggard being told to let an ant, less than a quarter of an inch long and
weighing a slight fraction of an ounce, be the teacher. He continues that “a person
with gifts of speech, with a brain the size of a whole anthill is told to bend over
and peer down, and learn from the lowly ant. The irony is powerful” (1989:99)
cf. Ross (1991:932).
Third, and closely related to the above, is the significance of the feminine con-
108 109
2.3 Intertexture in Proverbs 6:6-11 The fact that modern scientific study has uncovered hierarchy in an
First, we need to point out that the “sluggard” is a prominent subject in the book ant colony is beside the point. This information was not available
of Proverbs (10:26; 13:4; 15:19; 19:24; 20:4; 21:25; 22:13; 24:30-34; 26:13-16). to the ancient Near Eastern observer, so the sage is speaking from
What is particular to a majority of these texts is they emphasise the individual. As the point of view of naïve observation. And without obvious social
much as the Israelites enjoyed a communal ideal, they could not escape from the structure, these creatures cope quite well.
fact that individuals made up the solidarity they took pleasure in. Therefore, the
stance taken here of singling out the offender was crucial in a communal setting. Even if this information was available, it does not take away from the point be-
ing made in this poem. Waltke (2004:336) concurs with this explanation when
Second, the examples from nature in terms of industriousness and other aspects he adds that even though there is a perfect social organisation among ants, as
also feature quite a lot in the OT (Job 12:7; Is. 1:3; Jer. 8:7). More specifically, is entomologists have discovered, this does not imply a hierarchy of command.
the reiteration of the “ant” as an example (Pr. 30:25-26) and the comparison to lo- The concept “chief” describes one who holds others accountable in upholding
custs and lizards (Pr. 30:27-28). The main idea here is that lessons from nature are the law, as is true in the Israelite paterfamilias in which the head of a household
available to all and as such, are indisputable. In our instance the lesson is three- exercises such authority; (see Jos 19:13; Job 29:35; Pr 25:13; Is 3:6-7; Dn 11:18
fold; that of foresight, industry and preparedness. Perdue (2000:125) comments for the use of the same concept and perhaps its implication in these contexts). The
that “unstated but assumed is that the ant recognises that the preparation will idea of a chieftainship was not formally instituted in Israel. The closest to that
enable it to survive sustained periods of drought and bitter cold. This illustration ideal is probably the period of the judges, otherwise “chiefs” were known among
from nature becomes for the wise person a compelling example of the necessity Israel’s neighbours (Nm. 25:15). The “officer” was someone who exercised mili-
of hard work and the requisite preparation for future survival”. tary, judicial or civil administrative duties. The “ruler” describes someone who
governed or had dominion. None of these leaders are in view when it comes to
Third, there is the general association of the harvest with hard work as a divine in- the ant’s work ethic put forward here. On the contrary, the sluggard would have
stitution (Gn 8:22). As a result a number of scriptures reflect that common notion such structures to his aid, and yet astonishingly fails to deliver.
of summer time and hard work, (Ex 23:10,16; Pr 10:5; 14:4; 18:20; 20:4; Is 62:9;
Jl 3:13; Mt 9:37-38). The point to be made from this is that the ant demonstrates Related to the above is the fact that the ant’s foresight, is in line with seasonal
being in tune with cosmic reality as Clifford (1999:76) says that she “instinctively cycles. Van Leeuwen (1997:75) tells us that Palestine has two main seasons, the
springs into action at any opportunity of gathering food”. Hubbard (1989:99) cool, rainy season which runs from October to May and the warm, dry season
110 111
2.3 Intertexture in Proverbs 6:6-11 The fact that modern scientific study has uncovered hierarchy in an
First, we need to point out that the “sluggard” is a prominent subject in the book ant colony is beside the point. This information was not available
of Proverbs (10:26; 13:4; 15:19; 19:24; 20:4; 21:25; 22:13; 24:30-34; 26:13-16). to the ancient Near Eastern observer, so the sage is speaking from
What is particular to a majority of these texts is they emphasise the individual. As the point of view of naïve observation. And without obvious social
much as the Israelites enjoyed a communal ideal, they could not escape from the structure, these creatures cope quite well.
fact that individuals made up the solidarity they took pleasure in. Therefore, the
stance taken here of singling out the offender was crucial in a communal setting. Even if this information was available, it does not take away from the point be-
ing made in this poem. Waltke (2004:336) concurs with this explanation when
Second, the examples from nature in terms of industriousness and other aspects he adds that even though there is a perfect social organisation among ants, as
also feature quite a lot in the OT (Job 12:7; Is. 1:3; Jer. 8:7). More specifically, is entomologists have discovered, this does not imply a hierarchy of command.
the reiteration of the “ant” as an example (Pr. 30:25-26) and the comparison to lo- The concept “chief” describes one who holds others accountable in upholding
custs and lizards (Pr. 30:27-28). The main idea here is that lessons from nature are the law, as is true in the Israelite paterfamilias in which the head of a household
available to all and as such, are indisputable. In our instance the lesson is three- exercises such authority; (see Jos 19:13; Job 29:35; Pr 25:13; Is 3:6-7; Dn 11:18
fold; that of foresight, industry and preparedness. Perdue (2000:125) comments for the use of the same concept and perhaps its implication in these contexts). The
that “unstated but assumed is that the ant recognises that the preparation will idea of a chieftainship was not formally instituted in Israel. The closest to that
enable it to survive sustained periods of drought and bitter cold. This illustration ideal is probably the period of the judges, otherwise “chiefs” were known among
from nature becomes for the wise person a compelling example of the necessity Israel’s neighbours (Nm. 25:15). The “officer” was someone who exercised mili-
of hard work and the requisite preparation for future survival”. tary, judicial or civil administrative duties. The “ruler” describes someone who
governed or had dominion. None of these leaders are in view when it comes to
Third, there is the general association of the harvest with hard work as a divine in- the ant’s work ethic put forward here. On the contrary, the sluggard would have
stitution (Gn 8:22). As a result a number of scriptures reflect that common notion such structures to his aid, and yet astonishingly fails to deliver.
of summer time and hard work, (Ex 23:10,16; Pr 10:5; 14:4; 18:20; 20:4; Is 62:9;
Jl 3:13; Mt 9:37-38). The point to be made from this is that the ant demonstrates Related to the above is the fact that the ant’s foresight, is in line with seasonal
being in tune with cosmic reality as Clifford (1999:76) says that she “instinctively cycles. Van Leeuwen (1997:75) tells us that Palestine has two main seasons, the
springs into action at any opportunity of gathering food”. Hubbard (1989:99) cool, rainy season which runs from October to May and the warm, dry season
110 111
112 113
112 113
Lastly, we would like to bring to the fore the biblical notion of Shalom which “not Clifford R J 1999. Proverbs: A Commentary. Louisville: John Knox Press.
only means peace in the sense of the absence of strife, but also health, whole-
ness, prosperity, justice, harmony and general wellbeing” Adadevoh (2006:30). Garrett D A 1993. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs. The New Ameri-
Moreover, the command to epitomise the principle of the Mosaic Law, to love can Commentary V14 ed. E R Clendenen. Nashville: Broadman Press.
your neighbour as yourself (Lv 19:18 cf. Lk 10:27; Mt 22:34-40; Mk 12:28-31),
implies that we cannot claim to be neighbourly in the biblical sense if our neigh- Gitay J 2001. The Rhetoric and Logic of Wisdom in the book of Proverbs.
bour is hungry, poor or needy. Loving the neighbour, according to Proverbs 6:6- JNSL 27/2, 45-56.
11, also implies helping with ideas towards productivity. Imagine if we all were
persuaded to this kind of thinking, where would Africa be by 2050? Shouldn’t
Gerstenberger E S 2002. Theologies in the Old Testament. (Translated by
Christians and the church leadership in Africa be at the forefront of such ideas
rather than be outmanoeuvred by other non-governmental organisations?
J Bowden). London: T&T Clark.
114 115
Lastly, we would like to bring to the fore the biblical notion of Shalom which “not Clifford R J 1999. Proverbs: A Commentary. Louisville: John Knox Press.
only means peace in the sense of the absence of strife, but also health, whole-
ness, prosperity, justice, harmony and general wellbeing” Adadevoh (2006:30). Garrett D A 1993. Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs. The New Ameri-
Moreover, the command to epitomise the principle of the Mosaic Law, to love can Commentary V14 ed. E R Clendenen. Nashville: Broadman Press.
your neighbour as yourself (Lv 19:18 cf. Lk 10:27; Mt 22:34-40; Mk 12:28-31),
implies that we cannot claim to be neighbourly in the biblical sense if our neigh- Gitay J 2001. The Rhetoric and Logic of Wisdom in the book of Proverbs.
bour is hungry, poor or needy. Loving the neighbour, according to Proverbs 6:6- JNSL 27/2, 45-56.
11, also implies helping with ideas towards productivity. Imagine if we all were
persuaded to this kind of thinking, where would Africa be by 2050? Shouldn’t
Gerstenberger E S 2002. Theologies in the Old Testament. (Translated by
Christians and the church leadership in Africa be at the forefront of such ideas
rather than be outmanoeuvred by other non-governmental organisations?
J Bowden). London: T&T Clark.
114 115
Challenge. Claremont: David Philip Publishers. The Goal of Servant Leadership in African Churches: A
Nassif T 1996. Jesus, Politics and the Church: The Mind of Christ on Swot Analysis.
Christians in Politics. New York: WinePress Pub.
Sheila T H Moyo, Masters Student, Cape Town Baptist Seminary. Dr
O’ Donavon W 2000. Biblical Christianity in Modern Africa. Carlisle: Pat- Linzay Rinquest, Cape Town Baptist Seminary, Research Associate,
ternoster Publishing. University of Pretoria.
Perdue A 2000. Proverbs: A Bible commentary for Preaching and Teach- Abstract
ing. (Interpretation). Lousville: John Knox Press. Gehman (2008:x) quotes John Stott as saying, “Our model of leadership is often
shaped more by culture than by Christ. Yet many cultural models of leadership
Robbins V K 1996. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, are incompatible with the servant imagery taught and exhibited by the Lord Je-
Society and Ideology. New York: Routledge. sus. Nevertheless, these alien cultural models are often transplanted uncritically
into the church and its hierarchy. In Africa it is the tribal chief, in Latin America
the machismo (exaggerated masculinity) of the Spanish male, in South Asia the
Roe K 2006. Sub-Saharan Africa and Extreme Poverty. North American
religious guru fawned on by his disciples, in East Asia the Confucian legacy of
Association of Christians in Social Work. www.nacsw.org the teacher’s unchallengeable authority, and in Britain the British raj mental-
ity – the overbearing pride associated with the period of British rule until Indian
Ross A P 1991. Proverbs in The Expositors Bible Commentary: with The independence in 1947. It is easy for Christian leaders to assimilate one or other
New International Version of the Holy Bible in Twelve Volumes. F R Gae- of these models without realizing it”. Consequently, servant leadership remains
belein (ed). Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House. a challenge among black African Christians which needs to be addressed. Al-
though much has been written about servant leadership, more attention is re-
Rukuni M 2011. Traditional Agriculture: How can productivity Be im- quired to bring about the change in the lives of Black Christians.
proved. in Advocates for Change: How to Overcome Africa’s Challenges.
M Mbeki (ed) Johannesburg: Picador. 1. Introduction
We are all born in a culture and that culture either influences the way we interpret
scripture or is incorporated in the way we practice Christianity. The practice of
Sachs J 2005. The End of Poverty: How we can make it happen in our
biblical leadership, more so servant leadership, has been a great challenge for
lifetime. London: Penguin Books.
the church in general. Simfukwe (2010:17) wrote that “in the African context the
chief is a good and natural picture of a leader. Whether we like it or not this pic-
Van Leeuwen R C 1997. Proverbs. in The New Interpreter’s Bible. Lean- ture has infiltrated the idea of leadership in every sphere of life”. To try and ignore
der E Keck (ed.) Nashiville: Abingdon Press. the influence of culture on leadership can only result in the church remaining in
its current status quo. Hence, this article will use a SWOT Analysis, a manage-
Waltke B 2004. The Book of Proverbs: Chapter 1-15. Grand Rapids: Wil- ment tool, to analyse the extent to which the African churches can effectively
liam B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. practice servant leadership in view of its current traditional practices.
Wisner B (eds) et al 2005. Towards a New Map of Africa. London: Earth- 1.1 S.W.O.T Analysis (Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and
scan. Threats)
The SWOT Analysis approach is a strategic planning tool used by decision-mak-
6. Internet Sources ers in organisations to evaluate the favourable and unfavourable factors that af-
fect the achieving of desired goals. According to www.managementstudyguide.
Email: [email protected]
com, the usefulness of SWOT analysis is not limited to profit-seeking organisa-
tions. It can be used by non-profit organisations, government units and individu-
*This article forms part of research work in progress being completed as part of the degree Master
of Arts (Practical Theology) at the University of Pretoria.
116 117