Disability 26 Dec 2013
Disability 26 Dec 2013
Ma
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Content i
Foreword iii
Preface v
NIS Personnel Associated with this report vii
vi
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms viii
vii
Cambodia-Province Map ix
Viii
Figures at a Glance of the Results of Cambodia Inter-censal Population Survey 2013 x
ix
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Survey Objectives 1
1.3 Survey Content 1
1.4 Survey Organization 2
1.5 Training of Field Staff 2
1.6 Collection of data and Supervision 2
1.7 Data Processing 3
1.8 Tabulation and Analysis Plans 3
1.9 Dissemination Plan 4
1.10 Quality Assurance 4
1.11 Limitations of the Survey 4
Chapter 2: Sampling Design, Estimation and Evaluation 5
2.1 Introduction 5
2.2 Sampling Frame 5
2.3 Stratification 5
2.4 Sample Size and Sample Allocation 5
2.5 Survey design 6
2.5.1 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) 6
2.5.2 Secondary Sampling Units (SSUs) 7
2.6 Probability Selection 8
2.6.1 Probability 1 8
2.6.2 Probability 2 8
2.7 Extrapolation 8
2.7.1 Basic weight 9
2.7.2 Adjustment weight 9
2.8 Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals 9
2.8.1 Confidence Intervals 10
Chapter 3: Disabled Population-Size and Distribution 12
3.1 Number of persons with Disability 12
3.2 Disability rate for Cambodia and Provinces 13
3.3 Disabled Population by Type of Disability 18
Chapter 4: Sex Composition, Age Distribution and Marital status 22
4.1 Sex Composition 22
4.2 Age Structure of the disabled population 22
4.2.1 Median Age 26
i
4.3 Marital Status 27
Chapter 5: Literacy and Educational 31
5.1 Literacy Rate of Persons with Disability 31
5.2 Educational Level of Disabled population 38
5.3 Literacy and Educational Levels by Type of Disability 48
Chapter 6: Economic Activity 50
6.1 Introduction 50
6.2 Crude Economic Activity Rate 50
6.3 Economic Activity Rate by Type of Disability 53
6.4 Economic Activity Rate of the Working Age Group 55
6.5 Economic Activity Rates in other Age Groups 57
6.6 Employed Persons by Industrial Sector 57
Chapter 7: Other Characteristics 59
7.1 Fertility Level 59
7.2 Mortality 59
7.3 Migration Pattern 60
7.4 Household characteristics 62
Chapter 8: Summary and Conclusions 63
Annexes 69
Annex 1 - Form A House Listing 68
71
Annex 2 - Form B Household Questionnaire 69
72
Annex 3 - List of Priority Tables 78
GLOSSARY 80
Annex tables 89
ii
FOREWORD
This survey is follow-up of the successful Population Census conducted in 2008 after
Population Census 1998. The census results have been widely disseminated within the
line Ministries and among large body of data users and public. The National Population
Policy for Cambodia formulated in August 2003 was one of the significant outcomes of
the census results.
The successful conduct of the next census is crucial to obtain a correct population count
and to update the much needed demographic data in the country. Such information is
required for planning not only at national and provincial level but also at district,
commune and event at village levels.
The present survey is in the nature of preparation for the gigantic task of the census.
More than a thousand staff of the NIS and Provincial Planning Office was trained in this
survey. Their services will be available for the next census to train a large number of
enumerators and supervisors who will be recruited. The CIPS 2013 may therefore be
called the harbinger of the next Population in Cambodia due in the year 2018.
On behalf of the Ministry of Planning, I wish to place on record our gratitude to the
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for supporting the whole process of CIPS,
2013 including resources and technical assistance program with emphasis on capacity
development. Thanks are due to Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) for
providing technical assistance for mapping villages and Enumeration Area (EAs), and for
participating in analysis and dissemination of the results.
I appreciate the hard work put in by the staff of the NIS under the guidance and
supervision of H.E. Mrs. Hang Lina, Director General, NIS and the Provincial Planning
Offices in making the survey a success as well as in the preparation of this report. I wish
to take this opportunity to thanks all staff in the National Institute of Statistics as well as
all survey field staff who have taken part and contributed to success of the Cambodia
iii
Inter-censal Population Survey, 2013. We are also thankful to technical advisers for the
survey: Mr. Nott Rama Rao, Dr. Hans Petterson, Mr. Yi Soktha, Mr. Gregory Martin, Mr.
Fumihiko Nishi, Mr. Akihiko Ito and Mr. Akihito Yamauchi.
CHHAY THAN
Ministry f lanning
o P Senior inister,
M
Phnom enh P Minister f lanning
o P
December 2013
iv
PREFACE
The Cambodia Inter-censal Population Survey, 2013 was conducted not only to obtain
the much-needed demographic data following the census, but also to serve as a means to
train the staff of the NIS and Provincial Planning Offices in demographic data collection.
We are happy to record that the survey achieved both objectives.
This report contains and in-depth analysis on Disability in Cambodia based on the results
of CIPS, 2013. A general report at national level and separate report for each province
will be prepared later. There was planned to produce more in-depth studies based on the
results of the survey, on other topics of interest.
Our special thanks are due to H.E. Chhay Than, Honorable Senior Minister, Minister of
Planning, Cambodia whose keen interest in the census and in the survey was always a
source of inspiration and encouragement both to the national and international staff of the
project.
We sincerely thank to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) for supporting the
whole process of CIPS, 2013 including resources and technical assistance program with
emphasis on capacity development. Thanks are due to Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA) for providing technical assistance for mapping villages and Enumeration
Area (EAs), and for participating in analysis and dissemination of the results.
The success of the survey was mainly due to the enthusiastic participation of a large
number of staff in fieldwork, data processing and other survey activities. To every one of
them our thanks are due. The UNFPA and JICA national project staff closely assisted the
NIS and the provincial staff. The names of personnel associated with this report are
mentioned separately. We are thankful all of them.
v
Cambodia Inter-censal Population Survey, 2013
Personnel Associated with this report
vii
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
ASFR Age-Specific Fertility Rates
CDHS Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey
CD-ROM Compact Disc Read-only Memory
CEB Children Ever Born
CIPS Cambodia Inter-censal Population Survey
CMDGs Cambodia Millennium Development Goals
CS Children Surviving
CWR Child Woman Ratio
CSPro Census and Survey Processing System
DDG Deputy Director General
DG Director General
DUSC Data Users Service Center
EA Enumeration Area
GIS Geographic Information System
GRR Gross Reproduction Rate
IMR Infant Mortality Rate
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
MOP Ministry of Planning
NGO Non-governmental organization
NIS National Institute of Statistics
NSDP National Strategic Development Plan
PES Post Enumeration Survey
POPMAP Population Map
PSU Primary Sample Units
QA Quality Assurance
REDATAM Retrieval of Data for Small Areas by Microcomputer
RGC Royal Government of Cambodia
RS Rectangular Strategy
SSU Secondary Sampling Units
TFR Total Fertility Rate
TV Television
U5MR Under-Five Mortality Rate
UN United Nations
UN CensusInfo United Nation Census Information
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
WHO World Health Organization
WB World Bank
WinR+ Redatam Plus for Windows
viii
Map 1. CAMBODIA- PROVINCES
ix
Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013
Final Result
Figures ata Glance
Basic Characteristics of administrative
Number of municipality 1
Number of provinces 23
Number of cities/Krongs 26
Number of khans 9
Number of districts 159
Number of sangkats 204
Number of communes 1,429
Number of villages 14,119
x
Separated 0.2 0.1 0.3
Singulate Mean age at Marriage
Total 25.0 26.2 23.7
Urban 27.5 29.1 25.8
Rural 24.2 25.4 23.0
xi
Urban 4.4 3.5 5.4
Rural 1.8 1.7 1.9
Semi- Tem-
Percentage of buildings by nature of construction Permanent Permane porary
Total 73.6 19.7 6.7
Urban 93.0 5.3 1.7
Rural 68.9 23.2 7.9
xii
Rural 38.5
xiii
Chapter I
Introduction
1.1 Background
The Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013 (CIPS) was conducted in March 2013. The
reference time for the survey was the midnight of March 3 (00 hours). This is the second Inter-Censal
Population Survey to be conducted in Cambodia (CIPS 2013). The first one (CIPS 2004) was conducted
in March 2004. The Inter-Censal Population Survey in March 2013 was planned to take place exactly in
the middle of the two censuses held in 2008 and 2018. For the first time, the 2013 Inter-Censal
Population Survey provides estimates up to the provincial level. The target population set for CIPS,
2013 was the normal household population (regular households) of Cambodia. People living in
institutions, such as hospitals, hostels, police quarters and prisons as well as homeless populations were
not covered in the survey. However, normal households residing within institutional settings were
covered.
It is a nationally representative sample survey conducted for updating information on population size
and growth, fertility, mortality, migration and other population characteristics as well as household
facilities and amenities.
The process of formulating a National Population Policy has been greatly advanced through the
availability of population and demographic data. At the same time data from specialized surveys such as
the socio-economic survey and Demographic and Health Survey, labour force surveys and migration
studies have complemented the census data and helped build a body of essential statistics to guide the
development process. The conduct of the Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013 is an
important step in the creation of a continuous flow of population data that will enable Cambodia prepare
plans and programmes of development supported by a strong database.
The Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013 was conducted with the objective of providing
information on the following characteristics of the population: Population size and distribution; sex, age
and marital status; fertility and mortality; migration status; disabled population; literacy and educational
level; employment and unemployment; housing and household amenities; and other population and
household information. These fresh data will enable calculation of reliable estimates and projections of:
Population size and growth, fertility and mortality levels, volume of migration, housing and household
amenities and related details.The survey was also intended to train the national staff in sampling, data
collection, data processing, analysis and dissemination.
The draft questionnaires for the CIPS 2013 were more or less on the 2008 General Census pattern. Some
modifications, however, were made by adding new questions and amending some of the old questions.
Two types of questionnaires were used in the CIPS 2013: Form A House-list and Form B Household
Questionnaire (see Appendix I and II).
The Form A was used to collect information on buildings containing one or more households during the
preliminary round preceding the survey night (March 3, 2013). Form B which has five parts, was used
for the survey enumeration in the period closely following the reference time.
1
1.4 Survey Organization
The sampling design and estimation procedure adopted in the survey are described in Chapter 2.The first
preliminary field work for the survey was mapping that was carried out with technical assistance from
Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Trained NIS staffs were deputed to draw the sketch
map of the villages and detailed EA maps.
The Director General of NIS served as the Director of CIPS 2013. The provincial planning directors of
each of the 23 provinces and Phnom Penh Municipality served as coordinators in their respective areas.
About a hundred NIS survey coordinators were drawn from different divisions of NIS and allotted to
provinces at the rate of about eight to nine villages per person. They then acted as technical advisors to
all survey staff and were responsible for technical aspects of the survey in the allotted province. Their
foremost tasks were to train the supervisors and the enumerators, supervise the fieldwork and ensure
proper distribution of CIPS materials and collection of completed records.
For every selected enumeration area, there was one enumerator and normally the work of three
enumerators was monitored and supervised by one supervisor. Enumerators and supervisors were drawn
from the cadre of teachers and other civil servants. Preferably those residing within or near the selected
villages were appointed by the provincial directors. In all there were 955 enumerators and 318
supervisors busy in the field during early March 2013. The Senior Minister, Minister of planning,
Secretaries and Under-Secretaries of State, and other Directors of Departments also assisted in
supervising the field activities.
A technical consultant appointed by UNFPA undertook a few short-term missions at appropriate stages
to provide training and overall guidance to the NIS and to ensure proper organization and
implementation of the CIPS field undertaking as well as to assist in the preparation of the tabulation plan
and reports. A sampling consultant provided guidance on sampling particularly on estimation procedure
and computation of sampling errors. Data Processing consultant (DPC) in his short-term missions gave
training to the staff in data processing and guided and supervised the processing of CIPS results.
The 100 NIS Survey Coordinators (NIS SC) were first intensively trained at the NIS (November-
December 2012) by senior officers on updating village/ EA maps, sampling, house-listing, interviewing
households and filling-in household questionnaires, concepts and definition. The Province
Directors(with their Deputy Directors) were trained on CIPS at NIS for one week in January 2013, since
they were expected to be deeply involved in organizing the survey and making field visits to ensure that
the survey was proceeding smoothly. The training of appointed enumerators and supervisors on all
aspects of the survey, especially questionnaires and concepts (including practice), was conducted at the
Provincial Headquarters by NIS survey coordinators assisted by the Provincial Director/Deputy Director
for six days(19 to 23 February, 2013).
For every selected EA, a field listing was organized in order to make a current and complete listing of
households located within it. At the first step the enumerator would have to update sketch maps of
villages and EA maps. Residential and partly residential buildings were numbered using sticker and
marked on map by covering a prescribed path of travel in order to make sure that all buildings in which
households resided were accounted for.
2
During the primary operation of the survey (lasting five days from 26 February to 2 March, 2013)
building/structures wholly or partly used for residential purpose in selected EAs (955 in all) were listed
in the House List called Form A (Appendix 1). After the listing operation was completed in an EA, a
fixed sample size of 30 households was selected from the house list by the respective supervisor. This
selection was carried out systematically by computing interval in each EA and choosing the random
start, by using linear sampling. It was closely supervised by NIS survey coordinators to ensure
correctness in the selection process.
During the main phase of the survey, the Household Questionnaire called Form B (Appendix II) was
completed by the enumerator in each of the 30 sample households selected in his/her EA. Overall, the
supervisory teams found that respondents were willingly answering the survey questions.
The completed records ( Form A , Form B, Form I, Form II, Map, and other prescribed Forms) were
systematically collected from the provinces by NIS Survey Coordinators on the due dates and submitted
to the team receptionist at NIS. Training on editing and coding of filled-in schedules was conducted for
senior staff, who in turn trained other editors and coders. The purpose of the editing process was to
remove matters of obvious inconsistency, incorrectness and incompleteness, and to improve the quality
of data collected. In order to capture the data recorded on Form A (House List), Form B (Household
Questionnaire) and Form 2 (Enumerator’s Summary), three separate data entry applications using CSPro
software package were made. CSPro package was used for tabulation as well. The data entry section
consisted of 14 keyboard operators working under two supervisors. They were thoroughly trained on
data entry procedures and the CSPro data entry software in the third week of March 2013.
In consultation with data users, NIS decided to produce about 78 basic priority tables (see Appendix III )
most of which are for both National and provincial levels. The Provincial level Tables are only for Total
and not separately for rural and urban areas due to smallness of the sample size. These tables cover most
of the topics included in the CIPS 2013 questionnaires and their cross classification should satisfy most
of the requirements of all sections of data users. The production of priority tables may be followed by
the preparation of additional tables called supplementary tables if proposed by the data users, and other
tables produced in the course of in-depth analysis.
Analysis of the survey data will include preliminary analysis of provisional population totals, general
analysis at the National and Provincial levels of the final survey data as well as in-depth analysis in
respect of the following topics by the NIS analysis team with technical assistance by UNFPA and JICA:
( i) Fertility and mortality (ii) Population growth and change in spatial distribution (iii) Nuptiality
(iv)Gender and age composition (v) Disability (vi) Migration (vii) Literacy and educational attainment
(viii) Economic activity and employment (ix)Housing and household amenities (x) Population
Projections (xi) Women in Cambodia and (xii) Urbanization and development in Cambodia. Some more
topics may also be taken up for study if needed. A separate report on each topic is expected to be
prepared. For this purpose a workshop may be held for each subject involving the national staff not only
within the NIS but also from other line Ministries concerned. This will afford an opportunity to the staff
concerned to interact with each other and study deeply the survey results and draw conclusions which
could be incorporated in the analytical report. Such a system worked very well in the past census
analysis programmes.
3
1.9 Dissemination Plan
The reports mentioned under the analysis plan will be printed and published. The preliminary report
based on provisional population totals was released in August 2013. The present report contains general
analysis mostly at the national level, of the data contained in the priority tables. This will be followed by
the publication of analytical reports mentioned above in stages.
Off-line electronic dissemination products will be mainly in the form of CD-ROM. The project plans to
produce a variety of electronic dissemination products based on CD ROMs. These include: a Table
Retrieval System, a Community Profile System and a thematic mapping application. Census Info will
also be used as dissemination tool. The NIS maintains a web site (www.nis.gov.kh) for providing
information from population censuses, the results of various types of surveys, periodical publication, etc.
The salient results of CIPS 2013 will be put on the web site. Seminars for the presentation of the survey
results and workshops to train planners in the line Ministries and other data users may be conducted in
the course of 2013-14 in Phnom Penh and every province/district so as to benefit participants down to
the district level.
Adequate steps were taken to ensure quality of data at every stage of the Survey. For quality assurance
in field work, the importance of collecting quality information was stressed in the training classes for
enumerators and supervisors. The need to collect accurate data by gender was also emphasized. For
every four enumerators, there was a field supervisor who closely checked the work of every enumerator
under him/her. The data processing division initially carried out manual coding and editing of filled-in
schedules. Computer editing was also carried out to produce clean data sets freed of errors and ready for
tabulation. QA was maintained in production of tables also so as to maintain timeliness and security of
the tables. In the dissemination of census results accessibility, relevance and user satisfaction is
proposed to be ensured.
The various estimates presented in this report are derived from a sample of the surveyed population. As
in any such survey, these estimates are subject to both sampling and non-sampling errors. Although the
CIPS 2013 sample was chosen at random, the people who took part in the survey might not necessarily
be a representative cross-section of the total population. Like all sample surveys the results of the
present survey are estimates of the corresponding figures for the whole population and these results
might vary from the true value in the population. Nevertheless the demographic, social and economic
indicators produced are broadly comparable with earlier census and survey results contained so as to
serve as a measure of change over time, useful for planning and monitoring.
4
Chapter 2
Sampling Design, Estimation and Evaluation
2.1 Introduction
This is the second Inter-Censal Population Survey to be conducted in Cambodia (CIPS 2013). The total
sample size determined in order to make reliable estimates at provincial level was 955 out of 28,000
Enumeration Areas (EAs) of the 2008 Census as Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) and 28,650 households
as the Secondary Sampling Units (SSUs).
The survey was designed to provide reliable estimates for urban and rural areas at the national level but
at provincial level, it was expected to provide reliable estimates only for total population disaggregated
by sixth sample fraction varied by stratum and data were weighted to correctly represent the population.
Usually data would be weighted if the sample design gave each individual an equal chance of being
selected. This can be achieved by using survey weights. Weights can also serve other purposes, such as
helping to correct for non-response.
The sampling frame used for the 2013 CIPS was the complete list of all EAs of the 2008 General
Population Census of Cambodia. The list was updated to reflect administrative changes since the last
census up to September 2011. The main administrative change was the relocation of the boundary
between Kandal and Phnom Penh provinces with the result that 20 communes were shifted from Kandal
province to Phnom Penh. Twelve new communes were established, six of them in Battambang province.
In addition there were less significant changes like shifting of communes from one district to another
within a province, splitting and merging of villages etc. and creation of another Khan in Phnom Penh
(called Khan Pur SenChey) by annexing some part of Khan Dangkor and Kandal province. Taking into
account all aspects, some geographic areas have been re-coded for construction of a revised and updated
sampling frame for utilization in the multistage sample design.
2.3 Stratification
The main domains of study for the survey are the provinces. Reliable estimates were required for each
province. Consequently, the sampling frame was stratified by province. Within province a further
stratification by urban and rural was done. There was no explicit stratification of province as urban and
rural in the Demographic Survey of 1996 and CIPS 2004. The list of EAs was geographically ordered in
a serpentine fashion within each stratum. This ordering provided a further implicit stratification on
geographical location within the explicit strata as systematic sampling was employed.
An approximately almost equal allocation number of households over the provinces were employed,
giving a sample of approximately 1,200 households in each province. The size of the provinces
(population-wise) varies substantially; the largest province represents 13.1 percent of the total
households in the country; the smallest one represents just 0.3 percent of the total households in the
country. Within each province the sample was allocated approximately proportionally between urban
and rural areas.
5
Table 2.1 Distribution of Sample Enumeration Areas (EA) and Households by provinces
Sample Size
Province
Enumeration Areas (EAs) Households
Cambodia 955 28,650
BanteayMeanchey 41 1,230
Battambang 41 1,230
Kampong Cham 41 1,230
Kampong Chhnang 40 1,200
Kampong Speu 41 1,230
Kampong Thom 40 1,200
Kampot 40 1,200
Kandal 41 1,230
Koh Kong 39 1,170
Kratie 40 1,200
MondulKiri 37 1,110
Phnom Penh 41 1,230
PreahVihear 39 1,170
Prey Veng 41 1,230
Pursat 40 1,200
Ratanak Kiri 39 1,170
Siem Reap 41 1,230
Preah Sihanouk 40 1,200
Stung Treng 39 1,170
Svay Rieng 40 1,200
Takeo 41 1,230
OtdarMeanchey 40 1,200
Kep 35 1,050
Pailin 38 1,140
The sample design for the survey was a stratified two-stage sampling design, where the Enumeration
Areas (EAs) were considered as the Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) and the households as Secondary
Sampling Units (SSUs).
The EAs or the primary sampling units (PSUs) were well-defined geographic units for which reliable
population data are available. The EAs were arranged by geographical codes like province code, district
code, commune code, and village code village code and enumeration area code. The sample EAs were
then selected using the Linear Systematic Sampling without Replacement (LSSWR).
6
Selected EAs with less than 40 regular households were discarded and replaced by a neighboring EA of
sufficient size. Altogether 12 EAs were replaced in this manner. This procedure was not strictly correct.
It meant that the households in the small EAs had no chance of being included in the sample – a
violation of the basic principle in sampling. The proper procedure would be to combine the selected EA
with a neighboring EA in a random way. However, the number of replacements being so small, it does
not significantly affect the quality of the estimates.
Large EAs – the number of households exceeding 150 - were divided into roughly equal sized segments
containing approximately 60-80 households and one segment was selected randomly. In the case of
segmenting, the field team recorded the number of segments that were created and the segment that was
selected out of them. The EA map prepared clearly indicated the EA and the segments created within the
EA.
An important principle followed was that as far as possible the selected sample of EAs should not be
tampered with. If a selected EA turned out to have very few households, still this EA was kept in the
sample. Still, in a few cases practical considerations might have overruled this principle. There were two
cases where whole villages were relocated from one place to another because the old place had to be
cleared for development projects (villages 09020103 and 09020302). In these cases it was decided to
keep the villages in the sample.
For the purpose of selection of the secondary sampling unit, a household was defined as follows to guide
the field staff:” It is a group of people who presently live together and take food from a common
kitchen. By this definition, a household does not include persons who are currently living elsewhere for
purposes of study or work. The household includes domestic workers or temporary visitors. And, in
practice, we want to select our respondent from among persons in the household who will be available
for interview on that same day”.
In multi-household dwelling structures (like blocks of flats, compounds with multiple houses, or
backyard dwellings for rent, relatives, or household workers), each household was treated as a separate
sampling unit.
At this stage, sample households in the sample EA were selected, by Linear Systematic Sampling (LSS)
with Random start method as described below:
Where:
I = Mhi / mhi
7
2.6 Probability Selection
There was no proportional allocation of the sample at the national level. The spreadsheet containing all
sampling parameters and selection probabilities were prepared to facilitate the calculation. Sampling
was carried out based on separate sampling probabilities for each sampling stage.
2.6.1 Probability 1
nhi is the number of EAs selected in hth stratum. Nhi is the total number of EAs in the
hth stratum
2.6.2 Probability 2
The second-stage sampling probability involved in selection of certain households within the selected
EA in stratum h is:
୦୧
ଶ୦୧ ൌ
୦୧ ή ୦୧
Where:
mhi is the number of households selected in EA i in stratum h (mhi is usually =30; will
be less than 30 if the EA is very small, having less than 30 households in total).
Shi is the number of segments created in the EA (in most cases=1, i.e. when no
segmentation has been done. If 3 segments have been created then Shi is equal to 3).
2.7 Extrapolation
A spreadsheet containing all sampling parameters and selection probabilities were prepared to facilitate
the calculation of sampling weights. Sampling weights were adjusted for household and individual
records. The overall selection probability of each household in cluster i of stratum h is the product of the
two stages of selection probabilities.
8
2.7.1 Basic weight
The sampling weight (design weight) for each household in cluster i of stratum h is the inverse of its
overall selection probability:
ͳ ͳ ͳ ܰ ܯ ή ܵ
ݓ ൌ ൌ ή ൌ ݓଵ ή ݓଶ ൌ ή
ܲ ܲଵ ܲଶ ݊ ݉
2.7.2 Adjustment weight
A study of the sizes of the sampled EAs in terms of number of households showed that the EA sizes
(୦୧ ) were on the low side. There was probably some confusion in some areas regarding the exact
location of the EA boundaries resulting in under listing of households. Furthermore, there could be cases
where the EA was segmented but the segmentation was not properly recorded in the sampling sheets. It
was therefore decided to introduce an adjustment to the design weights with the effect that the sample
households in the EA would not be raised to the EA-total (୦୧ ) but rather to the number of households
per EA in the village where the EA is located. The weights became:
ܰ ܯഥ
ݓ ൌ ή
݊ ݉
ഥ ୦୧ is the number of households per EA in the village where the EA is located.
Where
These weights were used for estimates of household characteristics based on Form B data. The weights
can be expressed in terms of first and second stage weights as:
ഥ ܯ
ܰ ή ܯ
ݓ ൌ ݓଵ ή ݓଶ ൌ ή
݊ ή ܯ ݉
The first stage weight (ଵ୦୧ ) was used for estimates of household characteristics based on
the Form A questionnaire. (Form A covered all households in the selected EA so there
was no need for the second stage weight).
The sum of the first stage weights over the sample constituted an estimate of the total number of regular
households in the country. The estimate of total number of households was short of the number of
households reported in the Commune Data Base (CDB). It was therefore decided to adjust the first stage
household weights slightly upwards so that the estimates would agree with CDB totals. This
“calibration” of the weights was done at the province level by urban/rural. A further adjustment was
done in Phnom Penh and Kandal provinces due to the changes in boundaries between the two provinces
(20 Kandal communes were transferred to Phnom Penh province in 2011).
The sample survey is always affected by two types of errors: non-sampling errors and sampling errors.
Non-sampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data
processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the
questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. To minimize this
type of error, non-sampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate statistically.
Sampling errors, on the other hand, can be evaluated statistically. It is usually measured in terms of the
9
standard error for a particular statistic (mean, proportion), which is the square root of the variance. The
standard error can be used to calculate confidence intervals within which the true value for the
population can reasonably be assumed to fall. The standard errors are calculated in the SPSS Complex
Samples module. The variance of an estimate of a total is:
L ª º
2
nh
§ ˆ ·
V(Yˆ) = ¦ « h ¦ ¨¨ Yˆ hi - Yn h ¸¸
n
»,
h=1 « n h - 1 i=1 © h ¹ »¼
¬
mh
nh
Yˆ h = ¦ Yˆ hi
i=1
Some of the estimates from the CIPS will be in the form of proportions or percentages. The variance
estimator of a ratio can be expressed as follows:
V(Rˆ ) =
1
ˆ 2
V(>Yˆ) + ˆ 2 V(Xˆ ) - 2 Rˆ COV( Xˆ ,Yˆ) ,
R @
X
where:
L ª nh
§ ˆ ·§ ˆ ·º
COV( X,Y) = ¦ « ¦
nh
ˆ ˆ ¨¨ Xˆ hi - X h ¸¸ ¨¨ Yˆ hi - Y h ¸¸ »
h=1 ¬ n h - 1 i=1 © nh ¹ © nh ¹¼
V( Yˆ) and V(Xˆ ) are calculated according to the formula for the variance of a total.
Table 1 provides standard errors, confidence intervals and coefficients of variation for estimated number
of people by province. The overall reliable estimate at 95 percent of confidence interval of population
figures at national level of the CIPS, 2013 falls between 14,356,392 and14,996,882.These confidence
intervals vary from province to province of Cambodia as may be seen in Table 2.2.
10
Table 2.2 Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals and Coefficient of Variation for estimated
number of people by Province
11
Chapter 3
Disabled Population-Size and Distribution
The disabled population constitutes 2.06 percent of the country’s population of 14,676,591 in 2013,
(1.07 percent among males and 0.99 percent among females)
The proportion of the disabled in the rural areas (1.77 percent) are higher than that in the urban areas (
0.28 percent).The total number of disabled persons in the country is distributed in the 23 provinces and
Phnom Penh Municipality at varying proportions (Table 3.1).
12
As in the case of distribution of the general population, Battambang province accounts for the highest
percentage of the disabled population (10.65) and Kep province has the lowest percentage (0.23) in
2013. Kampong Cham province accounts for the second highest percentage of disabled population
(10.52). In the survey the provinces which account for more than 5 percent each of the country’s
disabled population are: Battambang, Kompong Cham, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Kendal,
Prey Veng, Siem Reap and Takeo. Takeo province has the percentage (6.52) in survey meaning in this
province there is no immigration and out migration of disabled population. In other provinces these two
movements and the mortality provide the diminution or increasing.
Table 3.2 gives the absolute numbers of the disabled population and the disability rate (percentage of
disabled persons to total population) by sex and type of residence of 24 provinces in Cambodia. The
urban areas of Cambodia which contains 21.44 percent of the country’s total general population account
for 13.81 percent of the total of disabled population in the survey.
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
In seeing In speech In hearing In Movement Mental Mental Other Multiple
Retardation illness Disabilities
13
Figure 3.2 Number of Disabled Population by type of Disability Cambodia 2013
120
100
Disabled Population in Thousand
80
60
40
20
-
Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Other Multiple
Retardation Illness Disabilities
Figure 3.3 Number of Disabled Population by Sex and Residence Cambodia 2013
350
300
Disabled Population
250
200
150
100
50
0
Total Urban Rural
14
Table 3.2 Number of Disabled Persons and Percentage to Total Population by Sex, Residence and
Province, Cambodia 2013
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
Population
Population
Population
of disabled
of disabled
of disabled
Urban
disabled
disabled
disabled
persons
persons
persons
persons
persons
persons
/Rural/ Province
No. of
No. of
No. of
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 8) (9) (10)
Cambodia 14,676,591 301,629 2.06 7,121,508 157,007 2.20 7,555,083 144,622 1.91
Urban 3,146,212 41649 1.32 1,527,479 21,886 1.43 1,618,734 19,763 1.22
Rural 11,530,378 259,980 2.25 5,594,029 135,122 2.42 5,936,349 124,859 2.10
Bantey Meanchey 729,569 13,898 1.90 354,604 7,020 1.98 374,965 6,878 1.83
Battambang 1,121,019 32,123 2.87 557,164 16,422 2.95 563,855 15,702 2.78
Kampong Cham 1,757,223 31,720 1.81 836,965 16,063 1.81 920,258 15,656 1.70
Kampong Chhnang 523,202 19,558 3.74 250,548 11,647 4.65 272,654 7,912 2.90
Kampong Speu 755,465 12,117 1.60 363,337 5,562 1.53 392,128 6,555 1.67
Kampong Thom 690,414 23,172 3.36 333,979 11,888 3.56 356,434 11,284 3.17
Kampot 611,557 12,406 2.03 303,709 7,626 2.51 307,849 4,780 1.55
Kandal 1,115,965 17,842 1.60 538,040 8,287 1.54 577,924 9,555 1.65
Koh Kong 122,263 2,575 2.11 61,319 1,274 2.08 60,944 1,300 2.13
Kratie 344,195 9,310 2.70 167,425 4,628 2.76 176,770 4,682 2.65
Mondul Kiri 72,680 742 1.02 37,098 337 0.91 35,582 405 1.14
Phnom Penh 1,688,044 14,074 0.83 816,145 6,673 0.82 871,900 7,401 0.85
Preah Vihear 235,370 3,959 1.68 116,737 2,264 1.94 118,633 1,695 1.43
Prey Veng 1,156,739 25,301 2.19 557,793 11,315 2.03 598,946 13,987 2.34
Pursat 435,596 7,031 1.61 208,292 3,752 1.80 227,305 3,280 1.44
Ratanak Kiri 183,699 2,193 1.19 91,265 1,024 1.12 92,434 1,170 1.27
Siem Reap 922,982 22,434 2.43 447,089 12,793 2.86 475,893 9,642 2.03
Preah Sihanouk 250,180 8,872 3.55 123,007 4,366 3.55 127,173 4,506 3.54
Stung Treng 122,791 1,177 0.96 62,149 807 1.30 60,641 370 0.61
Svay Rieng 578,380 10,854 1.88 286,073 7,004 2.45 292,307 3,850 1.32
Takeo 923,373 19,664 2.13 440,805 9,487 2.15 482,568 10,176 2.11
Otdar Meanchey 231,390 8,196 3.54 116,090 5,143 4.43 115,299 3,053 2.65
Kep 38,701 685 1.77 19,016 423 2.22 19,685 262 2.22
Pailin 65,795 1,725 2.62 32,859 1,203 3.66 32,936 522 1.58
According to CIPS 2013, the disability rate is the highest in Kampong Chhnang (3.74), Kampong Thom
(3.36), Preah Sihanouk (3.55), Otdar Meanchey (3.54). The disability rate is much higher than the
national average in each of the provinces of Battambang, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Koh
Kong, Kratie , Prey Veng, , Preah Sihanouk, Takeo, Otdar Meanchey and Pailin This is mainly due to
the fact that Pailin was one of those provinces in the Northwest that were seriously affected by war and
civil disturbances during the Khmer Rouge regime. For the same reason, perhaps, the disability rate is
much higher than the national average in each of the provinces (Table 3.2). In each of the remaining
provinces the disability rate is less than the national average.
The disability rate is higher in the rural areas than in the urban areas at the national level.
15
Figure 3.4 Disabled Populations (Both Sexes) by Province, Cambodia 2013
As may be seen in Figure 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 the number of disabled populations for Sexes, males and
females are very much highest in Battambang and the lowest in Kep province.
16
Figure 3.6 Disabled Populations (Females) by Province, Cambodia2013
17
3.3 Disabled Population by Type of Disability
Table 3.3 Percent Distribution of Disabled Persons in Total, Urban and Rural Areas by Type of
Disability and Sex, Cambodia 2013
Percentage Distribution
Type of Disability 2013
Total Urban Rural
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Both Sexes
Total number of Disabled persons 301,629 41,649 259,981
Total 100 100 100
Type of Disabled
In seeing 34.83 41.69 33.73
In speech 5.38 4.70 5.49
In hearing 9.04 10.19 8.85
In Movement 33.42 26.06 34.60
Mental Retardation 5.18 6.89 4.90
Mental illness 7.00 5.28 7.28
Other 3.52 3.14 3.58
Multiple Disabilities 1.62 2.05 1.56
Males
Total number of Disabled persons 157,008 21,886 135,123
Total 100 100 100
Type of Disabled
In seeing 31.35 38.20 30.24
In speech 4.39 2.31 4.73
In hearing 7.40 12.86 6.52
In Movement 41.44 28.80 43.48
Mental Retardation 3.64 6.67 3.15
Mental illness 6.18 6.30 6.17
Other 3.90 2.38 4.15
Multiple Disabilities 1.70 2.48 1.57
Females
Total number of Disabled persons 144,622 19,765 124,858
Total 100 100 100
Type of Disabled
In seeing 38.61 45.56 37.51
In speech 6.46 7.35 6.32
In hearing 10.81 7.23 11.38
In Movement 24.73 23.03 25.00
Mental Retardation 6.84 7.13 6.80
Mental illness 7.89 4.14 8.48
Other 3.11 3.99 2.97
Multiple Disabilities 1.55 1.57 1.54
Table 3.3 gives the percent distribution of disabled persons in Total, Urban and Rural areas by type of
disability and sex for Cambodia. While the persons with disability “in seeing” form the highest
proportion among those disabled, disabled persons in movement predominate among the persons
disabled. The percent of Mental Illness is the fourth highest proportion among the persons disabled after
Hearing this holds true for both males and females. In Cambodia as a whole, among the disabled
population, females have a higher proportion than that of males in respect of each disability barring
movement disability. This is observed both in the urban and rural areas
18
Figure 3.7 Distribution of Disabled Population by Type of Disability, Cambodia 2013
19
Annex Table 3 presents the percent distribution of the disabled population by type of disability for each
of the provinces by sex. The provinces that have each recorded a proportion of disabled population
higher than the national average under each disability are as follows:
Disability in Seeing
Banteay Meanchey, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Speu, Kandal, Koh Kong, Kratie, Prey Veng and
Preah Sihanouk
Disability in Speech
Battambang, Kampong Thom, Kampot, Koh Kong, Mondul Kiri, Phnom Penh, Pursat, Ratanak Kiri,
Stung Treng, Svay Rieng ,Takeo and Pailin.
Disability in Hearing
Kampong Cham, Kampong Speu, Kratie, Mondul Kiri, Phnom Penh, Preah Vihear, Pursat, Ratanak
Kiri, Stung Treng, Svay Rieng ,Takeo and Kep
Disability in Movement
Battambang, Kampong Cham, Kompong Thom, Kampot, Koh Kong, Preah Vihear, Pursat, Siem Reap,
Stung Treng , Takeo, Otdar Meanchey, Kep and Pailin.
Mental Retardation
Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Kampong Cham, Kampot, Mondul Kiri, Phnom Penh, Prey Veng,
Siem Reap, Svay Rieng and Kep.
Mental Illness
Battambang, Kampong Cham, Kandal, Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, Prey Veng, Stung Treng, Svay Rieng
and Takeo
Other
Battambang, Kampong Thom, Kampot, Pursat, Ratanak Kiri, Siem Reap, Svay Rieng, Takeo and Kep.
Among these provinces, the provinces of Battambang, Kampot, Pursat, Ratanak Kiri , Siem Reap, Svay
Rieng have each a proportion of disabled population higher than the national average for more than 5
percent and the remainder have each a proportion of disabled population higher than the national
average for less than 5 percent
Multiple Disabilities
Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Kandal, Kratie, Mondul Kiri, Phnom Penh, Preah Vihear, Prey Veng,
Svay Rieng, Otdar Meanchey and Pailin.
It is observed that every province has a higher proportion than the national average in at least one
disability. However there is no province which has proportions higher than the national averages in
respect of all the eight disabilities.
The provinces which have each a proportion of disabled population higher than the national average for
six types of disabilities are: Battambang and Svay Rieng.
The provinces which have each a proportion of disabled population higher than the national average for
five types of disabilities are: Pursat and Takeo
The provinces which have each a proportion of disabled population higher than the national average for
four types of disabilities are: Kampong Cham, Kampot, Mondul Kiri, Phnom Penh, Peah Vihear, Prey
Veng, Stung Treng, and Kep. The provinces of Banteay Meanchey,Kampong Thom, Kandal, Koh Kong,
Kratie, Ratanak Kiri, Siem Reap and Pailin have each three types of disabilities with proportion higher
20
than the corresponding national average. The provinces which have each proportion of disabled
population higher than the national average in respect of two types of disabilities are: Kampong Speu
and Otdar Meanchey. The remaining two provinces have each only one disability in which the
proportion of disabled is higher than the national average.
It is noticed in respect of the last category that all the thirteen provinces (Battambang, Kampong Cham
Kampong Thom, Kampot, Koh Kong, Preah Vihear, Pursat, Siem Reap, Stung Treng, Takeo, Otdar
Meanchey, Kep and Pailin) have each a higher proportion than the national average only in movement
disability. The persons with movement disability may perhaps be the victims of war and serious civil
disturbances that took place in these provinces for long in the past.
It is noticed also in respect of the two last types (Other and Multiple Disabilities) that all the three
provinces( Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, ,Stung Treng) have no (Other) and that all the six
provinces(Kampong Cham, Kampot, Mondul Kiri, Ratanak Kiri, Preah Sihanouk and Stung Treng have
no (Multiple Disabilities).
21
Chapter 4
Sex Composition, Age Distribution and Marital Status
According to CIPS 2013, sex ratio of the disabled population at the national level is 101.6 as against
94.3 among the general population indicating a higher proportion of males among the disabled
population in the country. The urban and rural sex ratios of the disabled population are 91.6 and 107.8
respectively. The sex ratio of the disabled population at province level varies over a wide range from
80.9 in Prey Veng and 83.2 in Mondul Kiri to 218.1 and 230.5 in Pailin.
Table 4.1 Sex Ratio by Residence and Broad Age Group of Persons with Disability, Cambodia 2013
The CIPS 2013, information on age in completed years as on last birthday was collected from the
respondents. The percentage of children aged 0-14 accounted about 10.63 percent (Table 4.2) of the total
disabled population as against 29.4 percent among the general population (See Chapter 4 of the National
report).
22
Table 4.2 Percent Distribution of Disabled by Five years Age Group, Cambodia –Total 2013
Age
Percentage of Disabled Population
Group
Both Sexes Males Females
No. % No. % No. %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Total 301,629 100 157,008 100 144,622 100
0–4 7,018 2.33 2,898 1.85 4,121 2.85
5–9 10,712 3.55 4,685 2.98 6,026 4.17
10 - 14 14,326 4.75 8,122 5.17 6,208 4.29
15 - 19 20,184 6.69 11,719 7.46 8,465 5.85
20 - 24 27,794 9.21 13,110 8.35 14,685 10.15
25 - 29 18,101 6.00 9,995 6.37 8,105 5.60
30 - 34 17,164 5.69 8,567 5.46 8,597 5.94
35– 34 14,063 4.66 8,518 5.43 5,544 3.83
40– 44 17,891 5.93 11,051 7.04 6,837 4.73
45– 49 23,553 7.81 14,271 9.09 9,281 6.42
50– 54 22,731 7.54 12,957 8.25 9,777 6.76
55– 59 23,805 7.89 14,835 9.45 8,970 6.20
60– 64 19,828 6.57 9,438 6.01 10,392 7.19
65 - 69 19,311 6.40 8,494 5.41 10,817 7.48
70 - 74 17,425 5.78 7,555 4.81 9,871 6.83
75+ 27,718 9.19 10,794 6.87 16,926 11.70
Figure 4.1 Percent Distribution by Age and Sex of Disabled Population, Cambodia- Total 2013
23
Figure 4.2 Percent Distribution by Age and Sex of Disabled Population, Cambodia- Urban 2013
Figure 4.3 Percent Distribution by Age and Sex of Disabled Population, Cambodia- Rural 2013
The disabled working age group accounted for 67.99 percent of the disabled population whereas among
the general population it constitutes 65.6 percent. In 2013, the proportions of the elderly among the
disabled population and the general population are 21.37 percent and 5.0 percent respectively. In the age
group 35–39 a decline in the population may be observed (see Figure 4.1). This is due to decline in
fertility and high mortality during the Khmer Rouge period.
24
Tables 4.3 and 4.4 in 2013 provide the age distribution of the disabled population in the urban and rural
areas of Cambodia respectively. In the urban areas children among the disabled population constitute 9.6
percent, the working age population constitutes 68.3 percent and the elderly constitute 22.1 percent. The
corresponding proportions among the rural disabled population are: 10.1 percent, 60.0 percent, 21.26
percent.
Table 4.3 Percent Distribution of the Disabled Population by Five Years Age Group,
Cambodia- Urban, 2013
Age Percentage of disabled population
Group Both Sexes Males Females
No. % No. % No. %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Total 41649 100 21886 100 19763 100
0–4 844 2.03 0 0.00 844 4.27
5–9 1590 3.82 1193 5.45 398 2.01
10 - 14 1567 3.76 1155 5.28 412 2.08
15 - 19 3511 8.43 2064 9.43 1447 7.32
20 - 24 3295 7.91 1745 7.97 1551 7.85
25 - 29 2396 5.75 1571 7.18 824 4.17
30 - 34 2500 6.00 1553 7.10 946 4.79
35– 34 2905 6.97 1224 5.59 1681 8.51
40– 44 2625 6.30 1282 5.86 1343 6.80
45– 49 2807 6.74 1192 5.45 1615 8.17
50– 54 2282 5.48 1054 4.82 1229 6.22
55– 59 2954 7.09 1614 7.37 1341 6.79
60– 64 3166 7.60 1396 6.38 1770 8.96
65 - 69 3490 8.38 1649 7.53 1840 9.31
70 - 74 2299 5.52 1208 5.52 1091 5.52
75+ 3417 8.20 1985 9.07 1432 7.25
Table 4.4 Percent Distribution of Disabled by Five Years Age Group, Cambodia –Rural 2013
Age Percentage of disabled population
Group Both Sexes Males Females
No. % No. % No. %
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Total 259,980 100 135,122 100 124,859 100
0–4 6,175 2.38 2,897 2.14 3,277 2.62
5–9 9,121 3.51 3,493 2.59 5,628 4.51
10 - 14 12,760 4.91 6,964 5.15 5,796 4.64
15 - 19 16,673 6.41 9,656 7.15 7,017 5.62
20 - 24 24,500 9.42 11,365 8.41 13,135 10.52
25 - 29 15,706 6.04 8,425 6.24 7,282 5.83
30 - 34 14,665 5.64 7,013 5.19 7,651 6.13
35– 34 11,157 4.29 7,293 5.40 3,863 3.09
40– 44 15,265 5.87 9,770 7.23 5,494 4.40
45– 49 20,746 7.98 13,079 9.68 7,667 6.14
50– 54 20,450 7.87 11,903 8.81 8,547 6.85
55– 59 20,851 8.02 13,222 9.79 7,629 6.11
60– 64 16,663 6.41 8,040 5.95 8,623 6.91
65 - 69 15,821 6.09 6,845 5.07 8,977 7.19
70 - 74 15,126 5.82 6,347 4.70 8,779 7.03
75+ 24,302 9.35 8,808 6.52 15,494 12.41
25
4.2.1 Median Age
According to CIPS 2013, the median age of the disabled population works out to 45.76 years as against
24.52 years for the population of Cambodia as a whole. The median ages of males and females among
the disabled population are 44.93 and 47.01 respectively. The corresponding median ages among the
general population are 23.40 and 25.77 respectively. The median ages of the disabled population in the
urban and rural areas are calculated as 44.22 and 45.96 respectively (Table 4.5).
Table 4.5 Median Age of General Population and Median Age of Persons with Disability by Sex:
Cambodia 2013
Total/ Median of General Population 2013 Median of Disabled Persons in 2013
Urban/
Rural Both Sexes Males Females Both Sexes Males Females
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Total 24.52 23.40 25.77 45.76 44.93 47.01
Urban 26.85 25.80 27.82 44.22 41.71 46.35
Rural 23.90 22.75 25.08 45.96 45.26 47.14
Table 4.6 Median Age of Persons with Disability by Sex: Cambodia and Province, 2013
Cambodia/ Province Median Age in
Both Sexes Males Females
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Cambodia 45.76 44.93 47.01
Banteay Meanchey 43.91 47.84 39.56
Battambang 46.38 44.95 48.06
Kampong Cham 45.22 53.41 33.82
Kampong Chhnang 46.49 43.10 52.50
Kampong Speu 38.97 35.18 42.44
Kampong Thom 48.52 39.58 53.06
Kampot 44.23 44.59 38.74
Kandal 45.77 35.99 47.90
Koh Kong 44.39 41.21 47.57
Kratie 51.19 49.19 55.03
Mondul Kiri 27.71 22.78 34.46
Phnom Penh 41.16 46.08 39.86
Preah Vihear 40.87 40.78 41.05
Prey Veng 46.00 40.40 51.64
Pursat 47.95 43.65 59.10
Ratanak Kiri 32.25 30.09 40.98
Siem Seap 37.93 39.69 32.77
Preah Sihanouk 55.53 48.42 58.86
Stung Treng 42.69 40.97 45.43
Svay Rieng 46.40 45.02 48.97
Takeo 49.37 50.72 47.62
Otdar Meanchey 47.65 47.92 46.36
Kep 49.84 45.77 56.33
Pailin 42.67 44.03 33.43
26
The highest median age (Table 4.6) is observed in Preah Sihanouk province (55.53) and the lowest in
Mondul Kiri province (27.71). In respect of males also Kampong Cham (53.41) leads with Mondul Kiri
recording the lowest figure of 22.38. In the case of females Pursat province has recorded the highest
median age (59.10) and Siem Reap has recorded the lowest figure of 32.77. On the basis of the median
age levels, the disabled population in Cambodia may be categorized as an “old population”.
Annex Table 4 presents the percent distribution of the disabled population in each type of disability by
broad age group, sex and residence for Cambodia. It is observed that at the national level, under
disability, the age group 15-29 has the highest proportions of the disabled in all the categories except in
hearing and in multiple disabilities. In the case of disability in speech the highest proportion (28.78
percent) is among children in the age group 0-14. Under disability the highest proportions are noted in
the age group 15-29 of disabled persons in speech and mentally Illness disabled persons. In respect of
seeing, hearing , other and multiple disabilities, the incidence is the highest in the age group 60+, 60+ ,
60+ and 60+ respectively. In general, those who suffer from different physical handicaps are mostly in
the age cohort 15-29 which represents people born during the troubled years 1979-1993 following the
Khmer Rouge regime. Disabilities in vision, in hearing, in movement, other and multiple disabilities
acquired are more prevalent among the older age groups. Following the age group 15-29, children in the
age group 0-14 have a high proportion of mentally disabled persons. These characteristics are noticed in
most of the provinces also on examining the priority Table E1 (not published in this report).
Unlike sex or age, marital status is an acquired characteristic and not a biological one. In Cambodia
marriage is nearly universal with about 90 percent of the population getting married before they reach
the age of 30 years. Table 4.7 prepared by a special tabulation (not covered by Priority Tables) gives the
distribution of persons with disability aged 15 years and over by sex and marital status for Cambodia as
a whole.
Figure 4.2 Percentage of Currently Married by 5-Year Age Group among Persons Aged 15
and over by Sex for General Population and Disabled Population, Cambodia 2013
27
Table 4.6 Percent distribution of Population Aged 15 and over among the Disabled Population
by Marital Status, Sex, and Five-year Age group, Cambodia, 2013
Never
Age Group Number Total Married Widowed Divorced Separated
Married
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Total disabled
Both Sexes
15+ 269,572 100 26.87 56.86 13.63 2.42 0.21
15 – 19 20,184 100 97.29 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00
20 – 24 27,795 100 76.61 21.20 0.00 2.18 0.00
25 – 29 18,102 100 54.58 40.58 3.09 1.74 0.00
30 – 34 17,164 100 31.86 63.19 0.87 4.08 0.00
35 – 39 14,062 100 22.95 69.83 2.50 4.28 0.44
40 – 44 17,889 100 13.38 80.15 2.80 3.67 0.00
45 – 49 23,553 100 11.09 79.79 6.27 2.26 0.59
50 – 54 22,732 100 7.97 76.40 12.26 3.37 0.00
55 – 59 23,806 100 6.31 80.07 9.28 3.29 1.05
60 – 64 19,829 100 7.48 70.65 19.86 2.01 0.00
65 – 69 19,311 100 4.65 55.81 37.35 2.19 0.00
70 – 74 17,425 100 8.13 61.17 29.08 0.92 0.69
75+ 27.720 100 2.94 49.86 45.08 2.12 0.00
Males
15+ 141,305 100 24.64 68.02 5.59 1.57 0.18
15 – 19 11,720 100 99.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
20 – 24 13,110 100 84.39 14.43 0.00 1.18 0.00
25 – 29 9,996 100 55.97 41.27 0.00 2.75 0.00
30 – 34 8,567 100 24.93 69.93 0.00 5.14 0.00
35 – 39 8,517 100 12.93 85.02 2.05 0.00 0.00
40 – 44 11,052 100 8.08 88.84 1.97 1.11 0.00
45 – 49 14,271 100 3.44 93.03 2.51 1.02 0.00
50 – 54 12,957 100 2.18 89.41 6.49 1.93 0.00
55 – 59 14,836 100 0.58 92.99 3.28 1.47 1.68
60 – 64 9,436 100 7.52 84.54 6.79 1.14 0.00
65 – 69 8,494 100 0.00 76.51 19.84 3.65 0.00
70 – 74 7,555 100 9.89 78.88 11.23 0.00 0.00
75+ 10,794 100 0.51 73.14 24.51 1.85 0.00
Females
15+ 128,268 100 29.33 44.57 22.49 3.36 0.25
15 – 19 8,464 100 94.24 5.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
20 – 24 14,685 100 69.67 27.25 0.00 3.08 0.00
25 – 29 8,106 100 52.86 39.73 6.90 0.50 0.00
30 – 34 8,598 100 38.76 56.48 1.74 3.03 0.00
35 – 39 5,545 100 38.35 46.50 3.19 10.86 1.11
40 – 44 6,837 100 21.96 66.10 4.13 7.81 0.00
45 – 49 9,282 100 22.86 59.42 12.06 4.17 1.50
50 – 54 9,775 100 15.64 59.16 19.92 5.29 0.00
55 – 59 8,970 100 15.79 58.71 19.19 6.32 0.00
60 – 64 10,392 100 7.44 58.04 31.72 2.81 0.00
65 – 69 10,817 100 8.30 39.56 51.10 1.04 0.00
70 – 74 9,870 100 6.79 47.62 42.74 1.62 1.23
75+ 16,926 100 4.50 35.02 58.19 2.29 0.00
28
Table 4.7 gives the proportion in each marital status category by type of disability. It reveals the
following major deviations from the general marital status pattern of the disabled. The percentage of
single is higher among males than females having “seeing”, “hearing” or mental disability. In the case of
disability in speech the proportions of single males and females are nearly the same. It reveals the
following major deviations from the general marital status pattern of the disabled. The percentage of
single is higher among males than females having “Speech”, “Mental Retardation” or mental Illness
disability. In the case of disability in hearing the proportions of single males and females are nearly the
same.
Table 4.7 Percentage Distribution of Disabled Persons Aged 15 and over in each Type of Disability
by Sex and Marital Status, Cambodia, 2013
Disability in
Disabilities
Retardatio
Movement
Marital
Multiple
Hearing
Mental
Mental
Status Number Total Speech
Seeing
Illness
Other
n
Both Sexes
Total 301,631 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Never
104,499 34.64 25.95 78.64 21.68 27.48 75.00 62.19 37.71 41.01
Married
Married 153,280 50.82 58.18 19.86 53.33 59.48 13.62 26.07 49.11 32.29
Widowed 36,747 12.18 14.21 0.16 20.50 11.01 8.28 7.97 7.77 26.70
Divorced 6,534 2.17 1.67 1.34 4.26 1.78 3.11 3.77 3.06 0.00
Separated 571 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.00 0.00 2.35 0.00
Male
Total 157,007 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Never
50,523 32.18 28.19 80.94 19.65 21.76 83.80 63.74 35.29 55.80
Married
Married 96,114 61.22 65.10 15.92 66.84 72.64 14.27 28.18 57.38 33.16
Widowed 7,896 5.03 5.84 0.00 9.96 4.38 1.92 6.29 0.00 11.00
Divorced 2,224 1.42 0.87 3.15 3.55 1.22 0.00 1.79 3.27 0.00
Separated 250 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.08 0.00
Female
Total 144,621 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Never
53,974 37.32 23.97 76.95 23.18 37.89 69.91 60.87 41.01 23.39
Married
Married 57,166 39.53 52.07 22.78 43.30 35.53 13.25 24.28 37.85 31.26
Widowed 28,850 19.95 21.58 0.28 28.34 23.06 11.94 9.40 18.35 45.39
Divorced 4,310 2.98 2.38 0.00 4.79 2.79 4.90 5.45 2.80 0.00
Separated 321 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
29
Considering in 2013 the persons with disability aged 15 and over as a whole it is observed that 26.87
percent is never married as against the corresponding percentage of 31.14 among the general population.
The percentage widowed (13.63) among the disabled population (aged 15+) is much higher than that of
the general population (5.03). This is mainly because the disabled population is an “old population”
whereas the general population is comparatively younger. The percentage of divorced among disabled
women (2.42 percent) is also higher than that in the general population (1.76 percent). The percentages
of never married among males and females aged 15+ in the general population are 35.31 and 27.40
respectively. The corresponding percentages among the disabled population are 24.64 and 29.33.The
proportion of never married decreases with the increase in age. However about 90 percent of the
disabled population are already married by the age of 45 whereas such a situation is reached by the
general population even by the age of 30.
In the higher age for women, from the age group 55-59 upwards, the proportion of widowed is
substantially high and it increases with age (Table 4.6). These old and physically challenged widows
constitute the most vulnerable group who need assistance and support.
The following marital status scenario of the total disabled population emerges on examining the data in
Table 4.7:
The proportion of never married (single) is higher for females than that of males. The proportions of
those who are currently married among males are higher than the corresponding proportion for females
among the disabled persons. The proportion in each of the categories widowed, divorced or separated in
respect of females is higher than the corresponding proportion among males.
If looked at from the point of view of age, the proportion of single males is very much higher than the
corresponding proportion of single females in every age group below 30. From the age group 30-34
onwards the opposite trend is noticed. In the higher age groups males marry much younger women
either for the first time or as remarriage once they are widowed, divorced or separated. This tendency
does not exist among older women. In all the age groups the proportion of widows is higher, with its rise
being faster compared to that of widowers. This is due to the following reasons: (i) wives are generally
younger than their husbands (ii) the expectation of life is higher for women than men (iii) men tend to
remarry at a proportion very much higher than that of women.
Table 4.8 Singulate Mean Age at Marriage for the General Population and the Persons
with Disability by Sex
The Singulate Mean Age at Marriage (SMAM) of the disabled population is much higher than that of
the general population, as may be seen from Table 4.8 in 2013. Marriage among the disabled population
seems to be relatively delayed.
30
Chapter 5
Literacy and Educational Levels
31
Table 5.1c Literacy Rates of Disabled Population Aged 7 and over by Sex and Residence,
Cambodia- Rural, 2013
Category Population Aged 7+ Literate Population Percentage of Literate
Population
BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4 (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
All Disabled 249,865 131,181 118,684 139,372 89,007 50,365 55.78 67.85 42.44
In seeing 83,719 39,197 44,522 53,439 29,695 23,744 63.83 75.76 53.33
In speech 12,724 5,939 6,785 3,156 1,516 1,640 24.80 25.53 24.17
In hearing 22,622 8,806 13,817 9,209 5,110 4,099 40.71 58.03 29.67
In Movement 87,507 57,643 29,864 55,516 41,719 13,797 63.44 72.37 46.20
Mental
12,328 4,137 8,191 2,914 1,329 1,586 23.64 32.12 19.36
Retardation
Mental illness 18,617 8,166 10,452 8,631 4,411 4,221 46.36 54.02 40.38
Other 8,560 5,172 3,388 4,895 3,963 932 57.18 76.62 27.51
Multiple
3,787 2,121 1,666 1,610 1,265 345 42.51 59.64 20.71
Disabilities
It is also noticed that the literacy level of the disabled population for females is lower than that of the
disabled population for total and males. There is an exception in speech; the literacy level of the disabled
population for females is higher than that of the disabled population for total and males.
Table 5.2 Literacy Rates of Disabled Population Aged 7 and over by Sex: Province, 2013
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Banteay Meanchey
Total Disabled 13,378 7,020 6,358 8,379 4,824 3,554 62.63 68.72 55.90
In seeing 7,151 2,815 4,335 4,993 2,170 2,823 69.82 77.09 65.12
In speech 422 288 134 309 175 134 73.22 60.76 100.00
In hearing 589 262 326 330 131 199 56.03 50.00 61.04
In Movement 3,520 2,470 1,050 1,940 1,541 398 55.11 62.39 37.90
Mental Retardation 724 445 279 293 293 0 40.47 65.84 0.00
Mental illness 302 185 117 185 185 0 61.26 100.00 0.00
Other 228 112 116 112 112 0 49.12 100.00 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 443 443 0 218 218 0 49.21 49.21 -
Battambang
Total Disabled 30,278 16,040 14,239 20,339 12,842 7,497 67.17 80.06 52.65
In seeing 8,097 3,627 4,471 6,080 3,080 3,000 75.09 84.92 67.10
In speech 1,437 791 646 404 204 200 28.11 25.79 30.96
In hearing 2,359 621 1,739 1,383 621 763 58.63 100.00 43.88
In Movement 10,905 6,685 4,220 8,177 5,907 2,270 74.98 88.36 53.79
Mental Retardation 2,026 725 1,301 801 280 521 39.54 38.62 40.05
Mental illness 2,395 1,087 1,308 1,498 755 743 62.55 69.46 56.80
Other 2,085 1,713 372 1,450 1,450 - 69.54 84.65 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 974 791 183 546 546 - 56.06 69.03 0.00
Kampong Cham
32
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Total Disabled 31,327 16,063 15,264 15,908 10,253 5,654 50.78 63.83 37.04
In seeing 10,509 4,770 5,740 6,503 3,141 3,362 61.88 65.85 58.57
In speech 1,028 310 718 - - - 0.00 0.00 0.00
In hearing 3,485 1,463 2,022 1,491 1,162 329 42.78 79.43 16.27
In Movement 11,365 7,942 3,422 6,314 5,544 770 55.56 69.81 22.50
Mental Retardation 1,774 338 1,437 - - - - - -
Mental illness 2,835 1,240 1,594 1,268 406 862 44.73 32.74 54.08
Other 331 - 331 331 - 331 100.00 - 100.00
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Kampong Chhnang
Total Disabled 19,130 11,337 7,793 10,108 6,710 3,397 52.84 59.19 43.59
In seeing 8,002 3,584 4,418 4,377 2,525 1,851 54.70 70.45 41.90
In speech 734 348 386 321 139 183 43.73 39.94 47.41
In hearing 1,574 997 576 547 371 177 34.75 37.21 30.73
In Movement 6,163 4,417 1,746 4,186 3,071 1,115 67.92 69.53 63.86
Mental Retardation 699 640 59 - - - - - -
Mental illness 1,350 1,015 335 468 397 71 34.67 39.11 21.19
Other 566 336 230 208 208 - 36.75 61.90 -
Multiple Disabilities 43 - 43 - - - - - -
Kampong Speu
Total Disabled 11,819 5,452 6,367 6,876 3,217 3,659 58.18 59.01 57.47
In seeing 4,714 1,932 2,782 3,500 1,249 2,251 74.25 64.65 80.91
In speech 535 239 296 - - - - - -
In hearing 1,402 377 1,025 519 143 376 37.02 37.93 36.68
In Movement 3,741 2,143 1,598 2,373 1,449 924 63.43 67.62 57.82
Mental Retardation 603 504 99 376 376 - 62.35 74.60 -
Mental illness 460 258 202 - - - - - -
Other 206 - 206 108 - 108 52.43 - 52.43
Multiple Disabilities 158 - 158 - - - 0.00 - 0.00
Kampong Thom
Total Disabled 21,989 11,421 10,568 9,905 6,745 3,160 45.05 59.06 29.90
In seeing 7,616 2,889 4,727 2,873 1,482 1,391 37.72 51.30 29.43
In speech 1,708 963 745 557 320 237 32.61 33.23 31.81
In hearing 1,776 831 945 242 242 - 13.63 29.12 -
In Movement 8,420 5,620 2,800 5,326 4,144 1,182 63.25 73.74 42.21
Mental Retardation 437 109 328 224 - 224 51.26 - 68.29
Mental illness 1,310 490 820 318 192 126 24.27 39.18 15.37
Other 637 518 119 365 365 - 57.30 70.46 -
Multiple Disabilities 86 - 86 - - - - - -
Kampot
Total Disabled 11,929 7,356 4,573 6,837 5,336 1,501 57.31 72.54 32.82
In seeing 2,604 1,694 909 1,755 1,227 527 67.40 72.43 57.98
In speech 759 369 391 383 122 261 50.46 33.06 66.75
In hearing 1,110 761 349 430 430 - 38.74 56.50 -
In Movement 5,578 3,496 2,082 3,252 2,633 619 58.30 75.31 29.73
Mental Retardation 661 123 539 123 123 - 18.61 100.00 0.00
33
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Mental illness 555 346 210 233 233 - 41.98 67.34 0.00
Other 661 567 93 661 567 93 100.00 100.00 100.00
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Kandal
Total Disabled 17,330 7,943 9,388 12,461 6,835 5,626 71.90 86.05 59.93
In seeing 9,043 4,369 4,674 7,731 3,991 3,740 85.49 91.35 80.02
In speech 402 217 185 - - - - - -
In hearing 856 494 361 856 494 361 100.00 100.00 100.00
In Movement 3,862 1,793 2,069 2,293 1,449 844 59.37 80.81 40.79
Mental Retardation 722 175 547 175 175 - 24.24 100.00 0.00
Mental illness 1,751 373 1,379 1,054 373 681 60.19 100.00 49.38
Other 348 348 - 181 181 - 52.01 52.01 -
Multiple Disabilities 346 173 173 173 173 - 50.00 100.00 0.00
Koh Kong
Total Disabled 2,401 1,219 1,182 1,219 813 406 50.77 66.69 34.35
In seeing 965 469 496 548 341 207 56.79 72.71 41.73
In speech 141 44 97 38 - 38 26.95 - 39.18
In hearing 105 40 66 40 20 20 38.10 50.00 30.30
In Movement 969 579 390 512 416 96 52.84 71.85 24.62
Mental Retardation 100 34 66 46 18 29 46.00 52.94 43.94
Mental illness 57 19 37 18 - 18 31.58 0.00 48.65
Other 34 34 - 18 18 - 52.94 52.94 -
Multiple Disabilities 31 - 31 - - - - - -
Kratie
Total Disabled 9,043 4,565 4,479 5,584 3,229 2,354 61.75 70.73 52.56
In seeing 4,162 1,721 2,441 2,867 1,391 1,475 68.89 80.83 60.43
In speech 303 60 243 56 - 56 18.48 0.00 23.05
In hearing 947 503 443 499 231 268 52.69 45.92 60.50
In Movement 2,539 1,878 661 1,631 1,350 281 64.24 71.88 42.51
Mental Retardation 317 60 256 57 - 57 17.98 0.00 22.27
Mental illness 394 77 317 177 77 100 44.92 100.00 31.55
Other 227 180 47 227 180 47 100.00 100.00 100.00
Multiple Disabilities 155 85 70 70 - 70 45.16 0.00 100.00
Mondul Kiri
Total Disabled 700 337 363 275 192 83 39.29 56.97 22.87
In seeing 144 78 66 99 67 31 68.75 85.90 46.97
In speech 51 26 25 - - - - - -
In hearing 179 49 130 64 49 15 35.75 100.00 11.54
In Movement 216 116 100 112 76 36 51.85 65.52 36.00
Mental Retardation 49 42 7 - - - - - -
Mental illness 60 26 34 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - - - - -
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Phnom Penh
Total Disabled 13,238 6,198 7,040 8,504 4,213 4,291 64.24 67.97 60.95
In seeing 4,040 1,843 2,197 3,005 1,475 1,530 74.38 80.03 69.64
34
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
In speech 959 - 959 804 - 804 83.84 - 83.84
In hearing 2,568 2,013 555 1,826 1,490 336 71.11 74.02 60.54
In Movement 3,310 1,532 1,778 1,725 1,057 668 52.11 68.99 37.57
Mental Retardation 945 347 598 - - - - - -
Mental illness 924 464 460 651 191 460 70.45 41.16 100.00
Other 214 - 214 214 - 214 100.00 - 100.00
Multiple Disabilities 279 - 279 279 - 279 100.00 - 100.00
Preah Vihear
Total Disabled 3,866 2,264 1,602 1,892 1,295 597 48.94 57.20 37.27
In seeing 927 507 421 517 396 121 55.77 78.11 28.74
In speech 298 228 70 229 181 49 76.85 79.39 70.00
In hearing 562 114 448 25 - 25 4.45 - 5.58
In Movement 1,550 1,094 456 858 503 355 55.35 45.98 77.85
Mental Retardation 91 62 29 62 62 - 68.13 100.00 0.00
Mental illness 333 181 152 201 154 47 60.36 85.08 30.92
Other - - - - - - - - -
Multiple Disabilities 104 79 26 - - - - - -
Prey Veng
Total Disabled 24,298 11,315 12,983 13,417 7,944 5,474 55.22 70.21 42.16
In seeing 8,842 4,204 4,637 6,047 3,691 2,356 68.39 87.80 50.81
In speech 1,276 555 720 194 - 194 15.20 - 26.94
In hearing 1,337 455 881 933 213 720 69.78 46.81 81.73
In Movement 6,703 3,900 2,803 4,254 2,940 1,314 63.46 75.38 46.88
Mental Retardation 1,826 291 1,535 390 - 390 21.36 0.00 25.41
Mental illness 2,350 1,161 1,189 1,228 897 331 52.26 77.26 27.84
Other 849 203 646 203 203 - 23.91 100.00 -
Multiple Disabilities 1,116 544 572 168 - 168 15.05 - 29.37
Pursat
Total Disabled 6,681 3,468 3,213 3,687 2,459 1,228 55.19 70.91 38.22
In seeing 1,317 600 717 690 369 321 52.39 61.50 44.77
In speech 534 147 387 362 147 215 67.79 100.00 55.56
In hearing 850 303 547 451 220 231 53.06 72.61 42.23
In Movement 2,493 1,778 715 1,405 1,245 160 56.36 70.02 22.38
Mental Retardation 479 132 347 256 132 124 53.44 100.00 35.73
Mental illness 386 200 186 198 129 69 51.30 64.50 37.10
Other 515 308 207 217 217 - 42.14 70.45 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 107 - 107 107 - 107 100.00 - 100.00
Ratanak Kiri
Total Disabled 1,797 821 976 796 402 394 44.30 48.96 40.37
In seeing 585 253 332 320 180 140 54.70 71.15 42.17
In speech 121 24 98 - - - - - -
In hearing 226 54 172 109 - 109 48.23 - 63.37
In Movement 518 358 160 164 113 51 31.66 31.56 31.88
Mental Retardation 72 - 72 - - - - - -
Mental illness 83 62 20 38 38 - 45.78 61.29 -
Other 191 70 121 165 70 94 86.39 100.00 77.69
35
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Siemreap
Total Disabled 20,997 11,988 9,009 13,396 7,681 5,715 63.80 64.07 63.44
In seeing 4,596 2,755 1,841 3,236 1,903 1,332 70.41 69.07 72.35
In speech 730 268 462 - - - - - -
In hearing 1,606 260 1,346 943 260 683 58.72 100.00 50.74
In Movement 9,760 6,864 2,896 7,088 4,712 2,375 72.62 68.65 82.01
Mental Retardation 1,627 529 1,098 499 166 333 30.67 31.38 30.33
Mental illness 1,242 672 570 361 - 361 29.07 0.00 63.33
Other 1,251 455 796 1,085 455 630 86.73 100.00 79.15
Multiple Disabilities 184 184 - 184 184 - 100.00 100.00 -
Preah Sihanouk
Total Disabled 8,844 4,366 4,478 6,407 3,836 2,571 72.44 87.86 57.41
In seeing 5,816 2,696 3,120 4,379 2,509 1,870 75.29 93.06 59.94
In speech 193 193 - 146 146 - 75.65 75.65 -
In hearing 584 224 360 313 194 119 53.60 86.61 33.06
In Movement 1,929 1,090 838 1,378 859 519 71.44 78.81 61.93
Mental Retardation 177 98 79 63 63 - 35.59 64.29 0.00
Mental illness 113 33 80 96 33 63 84.96 100.00 78.75
Other 32 32 - 32 32 - 100.00 100.00 -
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Stung Treng
Total Disabled 1,024 687 338 543 389 154 53.03 56.62 45.56
In seeing 197 111 86 125 75 50 63.45 67.57 58.14
In speech 81 65 16 17 17 - 20.99 26.15 -
In hearing 178 51 126 34 23 11 19.10 45.10 8.73
In Movement 435 385 50 324 274 50 74.48 71.17 100.00
Mental Retardation 22 - 22 22 - 22 100.00 - 100.00
Mental illness 112 74 37 21 - 21 18.75 0.00 56.76
Other - - - - - - - - -
Multiple Disabilities - - - - - - - - -
Svay Rieng
Total Disabled 10,618 6,899 3,718 5,859 4,728 1,131 55.18 68.53 30.42
In seeing 2,579 2,015 564 1,908 1,607 302 73.98 79.75 53.55
In speech 643 384 259 - - - - - -
In hearing 1,478 571 907 796 437 359 53.86 76.53 39.58
In Movement 3,049 2,221 828 2,152 1,766 386 70.58 79.51 46.62
Mental Retardation 770 521 249 - - - - - -
Mental illness 1,291 657 634 579 494 84 44.85 75.19 13.25
Other 616 338 278 232 232 - 37.66 68.64 -
Multiple Disabilities 192 192 - 192 192 - 100.00 100.00 -
Takeo
Total Disabled 19,000 9,316 9,683 9,826 6,501 3,325 51.72 69.78 34.34
In seeing 4,602 2,594 2,008 2,988 2,202 786 64.93 84.89 39.14
In speech 1,929 693 1,236 537 347 191 27.84 50.07 15.45
In hearing 2,555 878 1,676 532 532 - 20.82 60.59 -
36
Province/Total Percentage of Literate
Population Aged 7 + Literate Population
Disabled /Since Population*
Birth /After birth BS M F BS M F BS M F
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
In Movement 6,577 4,070 2,507 3,948 2,644 1,304 60.03 64.96 52.01
Mental Retardation 767 291 476 483 291 192 62.97 100.00 40.34
Mental illness 1,777 591 1,186 1,145 485 661 64.43 82.06 55.73
Other 590 200 391 192 - 192 32.54 - 49.10
Multiple Disabilities 203 - 203 - - - - - -
Otdar Meanchey
Total Disabled 7,936 5,073 2,864 4,588 3,230 1,358 57.81 63.67 47.42
In seeing 2,726 1,305 1,421 1,459 781 678 53.52 59.85 47.71
In speech 251 147 103 62 31 31 24.70 21.09 30.10
In hearing 427 243 184 190 190 - 44.50 78.19 -
In Movement 3,556 2,637 919 2,454 1,857 597 69.01 70.42 64.96
Mental Retardation 192 72 120 33 33 - 17.19 45.83 -
Mental illness 348 267 81 111 58 53 31.90 21.72 65.43
Other 258 258 - 172 172 - 66.67 66.67 -
Multiple Disabilities 180 144 36 108 108 - 60.00 75.00 -
Kep
Total Disabled 660 398 262 417 295 122 63.18 74.12 46.56
In seeing 159 85 74 92 54 39 57.86 63.53 52.70
In speech 8 8 - 8 8 - 100.00 100.00 -
In hearing 65 41 24 23 23 - 35.38 56.10 -
In Movement 339 207 132 243 177 66 71.68 85.51 50.00
Mental Retardation 40 24 16 16 8 8 40.00 33.33 50.00
Mental illness 25 17 8 9 9 - 36.00 52.94 -
Other 18 9 9 18 9 9 100.00 100.00 100.00
Multiple Disabilities 8 8 - 8 8 - 100.00 100.00 -
Pailin
Total Disabled 1,633 1,164 468 1,011 843 168 61.91 72.42 35.90
In seeing 419 285 134 290 240 50 69.21 84.21 37.31
In speech 104 80 24 38 27 11 36.54 33.75 45.83
In hearing 50 14 37 13 - 13 26.00 - 35.14
In Movement 866 671 194 597 522 75 68.94 77.79 38.66
Mental Retardation 77 33 44 43 25 18 55.84 75.76 40.91
Mental illness 74 48 26 9 9 - 12.16 18.75 -
Other 12 12 - - - - - - -
Multiple Disabilities 30 21 10 21 21 - 70.00 100.00 -
Table 5.2 gives in 2013 the literacy level of the disabled population aged 7 and over in the provinces
(including Phnom Penh Municipality) for total disabled population. The literacy rates vary from
province to province. The lowest rates are recorded in Mondul Kiri province and the highest in Kandal
for total, males and females. The literacy levels in the following provinces are each above the national
average of 58.03: Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Kampong Speu, Kandal, Kratie, Phnom Penh, Siem
Reap, Preah Sihanouk, Kep and Pailin. In each of the remaining provinces the literacy level is lower
than the national level.
37
Figure 5.2Adult Literacy Rate of Total Disabled Population by Age Group and Sex,
Cambodia, 2013
The CIPS 2013 give the graphic flow not uniform in 2013
In 2013 the distribution of literate population aged 7 and over by educational level the category “Others”
is excluded as it has very small numbers and is not clearly identifiable. Thus the total literate population
among the disabled for Cambodia is taken as 168,172 instead of 168,233
Among the total literate population with disability, the proportions of those who have completed
Primary level of education (25.0 percent) and Lower secondary level (17 percent) (see Table 5.4) are
lower than the corresponding proportions of the general population, namely, 29.4 percent and 21 percent
respectively, given in the National Report on the Final CIPS Results released in 2013. Those who have
the qualification of Secondary School/Baccalaureate level and beyond constitute hardly 1 percent as
against about 2 percent among the general population. The literacy and educational levels of female
disabled persons are generally lower than those of male disabled population. In each of the educational
level categories of “None” and Primary not completed the percentage of females is higher than that of
males.
38
Table 5.5 Percent Distribution of Literate Disabled Population Aged 7 and over by Educational Level, Cambodia, 2013
Sex/ Type of Educational Level (Percent)*
Disability Number Total Literate Illiterate Not Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Reported Not Secondary /Technical Secondary/
Completed Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
Total Disabled
Both Sexes
Total 289,917 100 57.54 42.46 0 100 0.82 55.68 30.88 2.26 9.39 0.96
In Seeing 99,811 100 67.68 32.32 0 100 0.74 56.63 27.18 2.15 11.57 1.72
In Speech 14,646 100 26.86 73.14 0 100 0.00 66.28 26.33 0.00 3.39 4.00
In Hearing 26,866 100 48.97 51.03 0 100 0.00 68.64 19.38 0.00 9.86 2.11
In Movement 98,361 100 61.51 38.49 0 100 0.88 51.43 37.10 2.97 7.63 0.00
Mental Retardation 15,198 100 25.95 74.05 0 100 6.31 71.33 17.09 1.61 3.67 0.00
Mental illness 20,527 100 47.18 52.82 0 100 0.00 48.52 37.27 2.43 11.78 0.00
Other 9,869 100 61.79 38.21 0 100 1.49 57.50 33.57 3.70 3.74 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 4,638 100 41.87 58.13 0 100 0.00 44.15 40.51 0.40 14.94 0.00
Males
Total 152,710 100 68.37 31.63 0 100 0.57 49.55 34.11 2.74 11.68 1.34
In Seeing 47,201 100 78.61 21.39 0 100 0.18 47.19 30.93 2.67 16.06 2.97
39
In Speech 6,446 100 28.81 71.19 0 100 0.00 46.14 45.52 0.00 7.18 1.15
In Hearing 11,621 100 65.99 34.01 0 100 0.00 63.41 23.19 0.00 9.77 3.63
In Movement 63,946 100 70.27 29.73 0 100 0.98 50.01 37.50 3.32 8.18 0.00
Mental Retardation 5,597 100 31.54 68.46 0 100 0.00 74.12 15.33 3.59 6.96 0.00
Mental illness 9,545 100 52.65 47.35 0 100 0.00 26.91 48.57 3.81 20.72 0.00
Other 5,693 100 80.28 19.72 0 100 1.99 55.10 35.50 2.43 4.99 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 2,663 100 55.79 44.21 0 100 0.00 57.72 22.24 0.52 19.53 0.00
Females
Total 137,206 100 45.48 54.52 0 100 1.24 65.93 25.47 1.47 5.56 0.32
In Seeing 52,611 100 57.88 42.12 0 100 1.42 68.12 22.63 1.51 6.12 0.20
In Speech 8,200 100 25.33 74.67 0 100 0.00 84.27 9.17 0.00 0.00 6.55
In Hearing 15,245 100 36.00 64.00 0 100 0.00 75.96 14.05 0.00 9.99 0.00
In Movement 34,415 100 45.23 54.77 0 100 0.58 55.53 35.92 1.94 6.03 0.00
Mental Retardation 9,601 100 22.70 77.30 0 100 11.42 69.06 18.51 0.00 1.00 0.00
Mental illness 10,982 100 42.42 57.58 0 100 0.00 71.82 25.08 0.96 2.14 0.00
Other 4,176 100 36.57 63.43 0 100 0.00 64.70 27.81 7.49 0.00 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 1,975 100 23.10 76.90 0 100 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
* Excludes "Not reported "and "Other" educational levels
The distribution by educational levels of literate disabled population among Total Disabled by urban and
rural areas is presented in Table 5.5 and in Table 5.6. It is seen that the rural proportions for primary not
completed and primary completed are higher than the corresponding urban proportions. In the higher
educational levels, however, the trend is reversed as expected. It is possible that in the urban areas a
portion of primary completed persons might have moved to Lower Secondary whereas their counterparts
in the rural areas might have stopped with Primary completed level without pursuing higher education.
Both in the urban and rural areas the proportions of males in the educational levels of Primary and above
are higher than those of females. In the case of Primary not completed the percentages of females is
higher than those of males, both in the urban and rural areas, the difference being more pronounced in
the urban areas.
Table 5.6 Percent Distribution of Literate Disabled Population Aged 7 and over by educational
levels, Sex and Residence, Cambodia, 2013
Province Number Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
/District Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
not Secondary /Technical Secondary/
Completed Diploma Technical
Diploma
Total 168,172 100 0.44 55.08 30.62 2.24 10.67 0.95
Males 104,752 100 0.48 48.36 33.98 2.72 13.11 1.34
Females 63,420 100 0.37 66.18 25.06 1.45 6.63 0.31
Urban 28,861 100 0.00 49.63 24.94 3.66 18.23 3.54
Males 15,806 100 0.00 38.91 29.68 2.37 22.96 6.07
Females 13,056 100 0.00 62.60 19.21 5.21 12.50 0.48
Rural 139,311 100 0.53 56.21 31.79 1.95 9.10 0.41
Males 88,946 100 0.57 50.04 34.75 2.79 11.36 0.50
Females 50,365 100 0.46 67.10 26.58 0.48 5.10 0.27
40
Table 5.8 Educational Levels Completed by Literate Disabled Population Aged 25 years and over
by Sex and Residence, Cambodia, 2013
Number Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Province
not Secondary /Technical Secondary
/District
Completed Diploma /Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Total
Both Sexes 123,692 100 6.18 50.16 24.65 16.55 1.17 1.29
Males 79,827 100 3.60 44.42 27.72 20.92 1.59 1.76
Females 43,866 100 10.87 60.60 19.08 8.58 0.41 0.45
Urban
Both Sexes 21,465 100 10.51 42.02 18.42 19.47 4.81 4.77
Males 11,179 100 4.30 33.41 22.20 22.82 8.69 8.60
Females 10,286 100 17.27 51.38 14.34 15.83 0.59 0.60
Rural
Both Sexes 102,224 100 5.27 51.87 25.96 15.93 0.41 0.56
Males 68,647 100 3.48 46.21 28.62 20.61 0.44 0.64
Females 33,579 100 8.92 63.43 20.53 6.36 0.35 0.41
Table 5.9 Adult Literacy Rate of General and Disabled Populations by Sex, Cambodia, 2013
41
Figure 5.5 Adult Literacy Rate of General and Disabled Populations by Sex, Cambodia, 2013
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Genaral Population Disabled Population
Figure 5.6 Adult Literacy Rate of General and Disabled Populations by Sex, Cambodia, 2013
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Total 15 - 25- 34 35 - 45 -54 55 - 65+ Total 15 - 25- 34 35 - 45 -54 55 - 65+
15+ 24 44 64 15+ 24 44 64
General Population 2013 Disadbled Population 2013
42
Table 5.10 Percent Distribution of Literate Disabled Population Aged 7 and over by Educational Level, Cambodia, 2013
Educational Level (Percent)*
Sex/ Type Number Total Literate Illiterate Not Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
of Reported Not Secondary /Technical Secondary
Disability Completed Diploma /Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
Total Disabled
Both Sexes
Total 289,855 100 58.02 41.98 0.0 100 0.44 55.08 30.62 2.24 10.67 0.95
In seeing 99,750 100 66.48 33.52 0.0 100 0.32 54.46 27.67 2.18 13.62 1.75
In speech 14,646 100 30.49 69.51 0.0 100 0.00 70.29 23.19 0.00 2.99 3.53
In hearing 26,866 100 46.86 53.14 0.0 100 0.00 67.23 20.25 0.00 10.31 2.21
In Movement 98,361 100 63.75 36.25 0.0 100 0.85 52.31 35.79 2.86 8.19 0.00
Mental Retardation 15,198 100 26.08 73.92 0.0 100 0.00 70.69 17.01 1.60 10.71 0.00
Mental illness 20,527 100 48.07 51.93 0.0 100 0.00 49.47 36.58 2.39 11.56 0.00
Other 9,869 100 62.73 37.27 0.0 100 0.00 55.53 33.06 3.64 7.76 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 4,638 100 44.70 55.30 0.0 100 0.00 47.69 37.94 0.37 13.99 0.00
Males
Total 152,649 100 68.62 31.38 0.0 100 0.48 48.36 33.98 2.72 13.11 1.34
43
In seeing 47,201 100 76.45 23.42 0.0 100 0.19 43.37 31.75 2.74 18.90 3.05
In speech 6,446 100 28.90 71.10 0.0 100 0.00 46.31 45.38 0.00 7.16 1.15
In hearing 11,621 100 64.34 35.66 0.0 100 0.00 62.47 23.79 0.00 10.02 3.72
In Movement 63,946 100 72.32 27.68 0.0 100 0.95 50.69 36.44 3.23 8.70 0.00
Mental Retardation 5,597 100 36.53 63.47 0.0 100 0.00 63.98 13.23 3.10 19.68 0.00
Mental illness 9,545 100 53.60 46.40 0.0 100 0.00 28.21 47.70 3.74 20.35 0.00
Other 5,693 100 78.53 21.47 0.0 100 0.00 55.12 36.29 2.48 6.11 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 2,663 100 54.43 45.57 0.0 100 0.00 56.66 22.79 0.53 20.02 0.00
Females
Total 137,206 100 46.22 53.78 0.0 100 0.37 66.18 25.06 1.45 6.63 0.31
In seeing 52,611 100 57.47 42.53 0.0 100 0.47 67.70 22.79 1.52 7.32 0.21
In speech 8,200 100 31.74 68.26 0.0 100 0.00 87.45 7.32 0.00 0.00 5.23
In hearing 15,245 100 33.54 66.46 0.0 100 0.00 74.19 15.08 0.00 10.73 0.00
In Movement 34,415 100 47.82 52.18 0.0 100 0.55 56.88 33.97 1.84 6.76 0.00
Mental Retardation 9,601 100 19.98 80.02 0.0 100 0.00 77.83 21.03 0.00 1.14 0.00
Mental illness 10,982 100 43.26 56.74 0.0 100 0.00 72.37 24.59 0.94 2.10 0.00
Other 4,176 100 41.19 58.81 0.0 100 0.00 56.59 24.69 6.65 12.07 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 1,975 100 31.59 68.41 0.0 100 0.00 26.88 73.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Table 5.11 Percent distribution of Literate Disabled Persons Age 7 and over by Level of Education and Sex, Cambodia 2013
Educational Level (Percent)*
Sex/ Type Number Total Literate Illiterate Not Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
of Reported Not Secondary /Technical Secondary
Disability Completed Diploma /Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13)
Total Disabled
Both Sexes
Total 168,233 100 6.30 49.20 24.96 17.00 1.35 0.04 0.16 0.86 0.09 0.04
In seeing 66,379 100 4.50 50.22 21.35 20.03 1.84 0.00 0.22 1.54 0.22 0.09
In speech 4,465 100 17.29 53.01 21.34 4.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.23 0.31 0.00
In hearing 12,589 100 8.20 59.03 16.53 14.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.21 0.00 0.00
In Movement 62,705 100 6.64 46.52 31.18 14.52 0.83 0.11 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental Retardation 3,963 100 14.53 56.14 16.81 5.45 7.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental illness 9,867 100 6.93 42.55 27.24 23.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other 6,191 100 3.49 52.04 24.10 16.30 4.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 2,073 100 8.10 39.60 19.20 33.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Males
Total 104,813 100 3.51 45.31 27.25 20.81 1.47 0.00 0.26 1.19 0.15 0.06
44
In seeing 36,145 100 2.48 41.00 23.94 26.56 2.41 0.00 0.40 2.65 0.40 0.17
In speech 1,863 100 5.10 41.22 40.96 11.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.75 0.00
In hearing 7,476 100 6.17 56.30 17.52 16.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.72 0.00 0.00
In Movement 46,248 100 4.39 47.25 31.04 16.30 0.75 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental Retardation 2,045 100 0.00 63.96 12.86 9.49 13.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental illness 5,116 100 1.78 26.43 36.18 35.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other 4,471 100 2.24 52.90 24.07 19.79 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 1,449 100 0.00 56.66 20.01 23.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Females
Total 63,420 100 10.92 55.62 21.18 10.69 1.15 0.11 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00
In seeing 30,234 100 6.93 61.24 18.25 12.22 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00
In speech 2,603 100 26.01 61.43 7.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.22 0.00 0.00
In hearing 5,112 100 11.17 63.03 15.08 10.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
In Movement 16,457 100 12.95 44.48 31.55 9.52 1.06 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental Retardation 1,918 100 30.03 47.81 21.01 1.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mental illness 4,751 100 12.48 59.90 17.62 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other 1,720 100 6.80 49.83 24.19 7.15 12.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Multiple Disabilities 624 100 26.92 0.00 17.15 55.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Note* Excluding Not reported educational level
Table 5.13 Educational Level Completed by Literate Disabled Persons Age 25 and Over by Sex,
Cambodia, 2013
Educational Level Percentage of Educational Level Completed by
Literate Disabled Persons Age 25 and Over
2013
Both Sexes Males Females
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Number 123,753 79,888 43,866
Total 100 100 100
None 6.18 3.60 10.87
Primary not completed 50.13 44.39 60.60
Primary Completed 24.64 27.70 19.08
Lower Secondary 16.54 20.91 8.58
Secondary school/Baccalaureate 0.90 1.27 0.24
Figure 5.10 Educational Level Completed by Literate Disabled Persons Age 25 and Over by Sex,
Cambodia, 2013
45
Table 5.13 Percent distribution of Literate Disabled Persons aged 7+ by Level of Education and
Sex Cambodia, Province, 2013
Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Number Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Cambodia
Literate not Secondary /Technical Secondary/
/Province/ Sex
7+ Completed Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Cambodia
Both Sexes 168233 100 0.44 55.08 30.62 2.24 10.67 0.95
Males 104813 100 0.48 48.36 33.98 2.72 13.11 1.34
Females 63420 100 0.37 66.18 25.06 1.45 6.63 0.31
Banteay Meanchey
Both Sexes 8379 100 0.00 53.36 44.87 0.00 1.77 0.00
Males 4824 100 0.00 42.87 57.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Females 3554 100 0.00 67.59 28.22 0.00 4.18 0.00
Battambang
Both Sexes 20339 100 0.00 50.55 35.25 1.27 12.92 0.00
Males 12842 100 0.00 45.97 39.51 0.00 14.52 0.00
Females 7497 100 0.00 58.41 27.96 3.45 10.17 0.00
Kampong Cham
Both Sexes 15908 100 2.28 64.61 27.08 2.61 3.42 0.00
Males 10253 100 3.54 59.37 27.74 4.05 5.30 0.00
Females 5654 100 0.00 74.12 25.88 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kampong Chhnang
Both Sexes 10108 100 0.00 59.18 35.56 0.78 4.49 0.00
Males 6710 100 0.00 57.10 35.90 1.17 5.83 0.00
Females 3397 100 0.00 63.28 34.88 0.00 1.84 0.00
Kampong Speu
Both Sexes 6876 100 0.00 57.70 29.99 0.00 11.05 1.27
Males 3217 100 0.00 53.45 32.79 0.00 11.05 2.70
Females 3659 100 0.00 61.43 27.53 0.00 11.04 0.00
Kampong Thom
Both Sexes 9905 100 1.44 46.79 36.90 1.17 12.33 1.37
Males 6745 100 0.00 38.78 46.25 1.71 13.25 0.00
Females 3160 100 4.51 63.89 16.95 0.00 10.35 4.31
Kampot
Both Sexes 6837 100 1.12 49.74 27.30 8.82 10.90 2.12
Males 5336 100 1.43 50.93 24.94 11.31 8.68 2.71
Females 1501 100 0.00 45.50 35.70 0.00 18.80 0.00
Kandal
Both Sexes 12461 100 0.00 49.76 24.46 1.83 22.34 1.61
Males 6835 100 0.00 27.75 25.26 3.33 40.72 2.94
Females 5626 100 0.00 76.50 23.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Koh Kong
Both Sexes 1219 100 0.00 80.49 13.84 0.00 5.67 0.00
Males 813 100 0.00 78.18 13.32 0.00 8.50 0.00
Females 406 100 0.00 85.11 14.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kratie
Both Sexes 5584 100 0.00 59.64 28.14 2.98 9.24 0.00
Males 3229 100 0.00 47.80 40.60 3.80 7.81 0.00
46
Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Number Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Cambodia
Literate not Secondary /Technical Secondary/
/Province/ Sex
7+ Completed Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Females 2354 100 0.00 75.57 11.37 1.89 11.16 0.00
Mondul Kiri
Both Sexes 275 100 0.00 77.67 16.81 0.00 5.52 0.00
Males 192 100 0.00 68.00 24.09 0.00 7.91 0.00
Females 83 100 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Phnom Penh
Both Sexes 8504 100 0.00 54.87 21.61 2.25 14.50 6.77
Males 4213 100 0.00 43.35 17.16 4.54 21.29 13.66
Females 4291 100 0.00 66.19 25.98 0.00 7.83 0.00
Preah Vihear
Both Sexes 1892 100 0.00 64.04 19.34 0.00 16.62 0.00
Males 1295 100 0.00 58.19 23.14 0.00 18.67 0.00
Females 597 100 0.00 76.73 11.10 0.00 12.17 0.00
Prey Veng
Both Sexes 13417 100 0.00 61.17 24.93 1.85 12.04 0.00
Males 7944 100 0.00 49.84 26.69 3.13 20.34 0.00
Females 5474 100 0.00 77.61 22.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pursat
Both Sexes 3687 100 0.00 54.24 33.69 0.00 12.07 0.00
Males 2459 100 0.00 47.73 34.17 0.00 18.09 0.00
Females 1228 100 0.00 67.27 32.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ratanak Kiri
Both Sexes 796 100 0.00 47.95 21.77 15.23 15.05 0.00
Males 402 100 0.00 27.04 31.42 24.06 17.48 0.00
Females 394 100 0.00 69.31 11.91 6.21 12.57 0.00
Siemreap
Both Sexes 13396 100 0.68 66.12 24.24 1.85 7.12 0.00
Males 7681 100 0.00 72.99 20.33 2.05 4.63 0.00
Females 5715 100 1.59 56.89 29.50 1.57 10.46 0.00
Preah Sihanouk
Both Sexes 6407 100 0.00 32.18 29.98 11.44 19.64 6.76
Males 3836 100 0.00 23.91 36.31 8.75 21.36 9.67
Females 2571 100 0.00 44.51 20.53 15.45 17.08 2.42
Stung Treng
Both Sexes 543 100 0.00 41.15 44.91 3.90 10.04 0.00
Males 389 100 0.00 40.37 45.79 5.44 8.40 0.00
Females 154 100 0.00 43.12 42.69 0.00 14.20 0.00
Svay Rieng
Both Sexes 5859 100 0.00 51.69 40.53 0.98 6.80 0.00
Males 4728 100 0.00 47.44 50.23 0.00 2.33 0.00
Females 1131 100 0.00 69.44 0.00 5.06 25.50 0.00
Takeo
Both Sexes 9826 100 0.00 50.25 37.94 1.31 10.50 0.00
Males 6501 100 0.00 38.23 43.92 1.98 15.87 0.00
Females 3325 100 0.00 73.74 26.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Otdar Meanchey
47
Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Number Total None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Cambodia
Literate not Secondary /Technical Secondary/
/Province/ Sex
7+ Completed Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Both Sexes 4588 100 1.46 56.14 29.78 2.54 10.08 0.00
Males 3230 100 2.08 52.77 32.43 2.35 10.37 0.00
Females 1358 100 0.00 64.15 23.48 2.99 9.39 0.00
Kep
Both Sexes 417 100 0.00 66.74 13.55 5.67 12.20 1.84
Males 295 100 0.00 63.69 13.56 5.51 14.63 2.61
Females 122 100 0.00 74.11 13.52 6.06 6.31 0.00
Pailin
Both Sexes 1011 100 0.00 49.08 35.28 2.21 12.07 1.36
Males 843 100 0.00 49.41 33.27 2.65 13.04 1.63
Females 168 100 0.00 47.40 45.39 0.00 7.22 0.00
* Excludes "Not reported "and "Other" educational levels
With an average of 33.98 percent in 2013(Table 5.13) at the national level, the proportion of males who
have completed the primary level of education ranges from 13.32 in Koh Kong province to 57.13 in
Banteay Meanchey province. The percentages of females at that level varies from 0.00 in Mondul Kiri
and Svay Rieng provinces to 45.39 in Pailin province, the national average being 25.06 percent. In
respect of Lower Secondary level the proportion of persons ranges from nil in Banteay Meanchey,
Kampong Speu, Koh Kong,Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, and Pursat provinces to 15.23 in Ratanak Kiri
province. The proportion of persons who have completed Secondary/Technical Diploma varies from
1.71 in Banteay Meanchey province to 19.64 in Preah Sihanouk province. In Kampong Cham, Kandal,
Koh kong, Mondul Kiri, Prey Veng, Pursat, and Takeo provinces there are no females among the
disabled with Secondary/Technical Diploma level qualification. The proportions of disabled persons
who have completed a level of education beyond Secondary/Technical Diploma like under graduate and
graduate, are very poor in all the provinces with nil in the provinces of Banteay Meanchey, Battambang
Kampong Cham, Kampong Chhnang, Koh Kong, Kratie, Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, Prey Veng, Pursat,
Ratanak Kiri, Siem Reap, Stung Treng, Svay Rieng, Takeo and Otdar Meanchey, and with Phnom Penh
Municipality recording 6.77 percent at the other end.
In 2013 the literacy levels of persons with disabilities in seeing , in movement and in other are higher
than the national average of 58.03 (Table 5.11) for the total disabled population. The literacy rate of
disabled in hearing is 28 percent points less than the national average. The literacy rates of those
disabled in speech (46.86), the literacy rate of persons mentally illness disabled (48.07) and the literacy
rate of persons in multiple disabled (44.70) are much below the national average. The literacy rates of
those disabled in mental retardation (26.08) is the most less than other type of disabilities and the
national average. The literacy rate is higher among the persons who became mentally illness disabled
than that of the disabled persons in mental retardation in respect of movement and mental disabilities. In
the other three categories of disability the opposite trend is noticed. The educational levels of persons in
each type of disability are also presented in Table 5.11.
In the case of mentally disabled, some explanation seems necessary: Since some mentally disabled
persons have literacy and educational attainment, the following situations are feasible:
Mentally illness disabled
48
(i) They might have become mentally disabled after they completed some educational level
(ii) Partially disabled persons might have also been treated as mentally disabled
Mentally disabled in mental retardation
(i) In some cases respondents might have reported mentally illness disabled persons in the category of
mentally disabled persons in mental retardation
49
CHAPTER 6
Economic Activity
6.1 Introduction
That part of manpower which participates or attempts to participate in the production of economic goods
and services is referred to as the economically active population or labour force of a country. The term
“labour force” is considered equivalent to “economically active population” according to U.N
recommendations. The latter term is used in this chapter to refer to the labour force.
The economically active population includes both the employed and the unemployed. Population not
economically active refers to the following categories: homemaker, student, dependent, rent receiver,
retired or other income recipient, and others who are not economically active for most of the time and
who do not come under any of these four categories.
In the 2013 CIPS of Cambodia information on economic characteristics of the population was collected
in respect of each inmate of a household in the following columns in Form B Household Questionnaire
Part 2: Col.19 Main Activity Col.20 Employment Period Col.21 Occupation Col.22 Employment Status
Col.23 Industry, Trade or Service Col.24 Sector of Employment and Col.25 Secondary economic
activity for all persons employed, unemployed and economically inactive (See Appendix II).
The reference period for recording the answers under the main activity as employed, unemployed
(employed any time before), unemployed (never employed any time before) or any of the inactive
category, was the one year or 12 months preceding the census night, that is in CIPS 2013 from 4 March
2012 to 3 March 2013. Main activity is defined as the activity during 6 months (183 days) or more
during the one year reference period. In other words it is the major part of the one year preceding the
census and CIPS date.
In 2013 crude economic activity rates (the percentage of the economically active population to the total
population) or simply economic activity rates (unless stated otherwise in this chapter) for the general
population of Cambodia and the disabled population are 56.78 and 53.65 respectively. For males and
females among the general population the economic activity rates are 57.75 and 55.86. The
corresponding proportions among the disabled population are 62.43 and 44.13 respectively. It shows that
women with disability participate in economic activity on a lesser scale than their counterparts in the
general population. This trend is reversed in respect of males.
The economic activity rates of the disabled population in mental illness are generally higher than those
of disabled population in mental retardation except in the older ages (60+). However in the age group
15-59 for females disabled in mental illness the economic activity rate is slightly lower than the
corresponding rate under disabled in mental retardation (Tables 6.1 and 6.2).
50
Table 6.1 Percent distribution of Total Disabled Persons by Sex, Broad Age group, Main Activity
and Residence, Cambodia 2013
Broad Age Economically
Number Total Employed Unemployed
Group Inactive
(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (6)
Total 301,629 100 48.00 5.65 46.35
0 -14 32,057 100 3.04 0.34 96.62
15 -59 185,287 100 64.30 6.68 29.02
60+ 84,285 100 29.26 5.42 65.32
Males 157,007 100 56.60 5.82 37.57
0 -14 15,703 100 4.94 0.53 94.54
15 -59 105,026 100 70.34 6.62 23.05
60+ 36,279 100 39.21 5.82 54.97
Females 144,622 100 38.66 5.47 55.87
0 -14 16,354 100 1.23 0.15 98.63
15 -59 80,262 100 56.41 6.76 36.83
60+ 48,005 100 21.74 5.12 73.14
Urban 41,649 100 38.73 7.88 53.39
0 -14 4,001 100 5.82 0.00 94.20
15 -59 25,275 100 50.47 11.49 38.05
60+ 12,372 100 25.38 3.08 71.55
Males 21,886 100 44.75 5.91 49.35
0 -14 2,348 100 9.92 0.00 90.08
15 -59 13,299 100 56.53 7.98 35.51
60+ 6,238 100 32.73 3.74 63.55
Females 19,763 100 32.06 10.07 57.86
0 -14 1,654 100 0.00 0.00 100.00
15 -59 11,977 100 43.75 15.40 40.87
60+ 6,133 100 17.89 2.43 79.68
Rural 259,980 100 49.48 5.30 45.22
0 -14 28,056 100 2.64 0.38 96.97
15 -59 160,013 100 66.49 5.92 27.59
60+ 71,912 100 29.92 5.83 64.25
Males 135,122 100 58.52 5.81 35.67
0 -14 13,354 100 4.06 0.63 95.32
15 -59 91,726 100 72.34 6.42 21.24
60+ 30,040 100 40.55 6.25 53.19
Females 124,859 100 39.70 4.74 55.56
0 -14 14,701 100 1.37 0.16 98.48
15 -59 68,285 100 58.63 5.25 36.12
60+ 41,873 100 22.30 5.52 72.18
As in 2013, in the case of the general population the economic activity rates of the disabled population
are higher in the rural areas when compared to urban areas. The economic activity rates for total, males
and females in the urban areas are 46.61, 50.66 and 42.13. In the rural areas the corresponding rates are
54.78, 64.33 and 44.44 respectively.
The economic activity rates for total, males and females are presented in Table 6.3 in respect of each
province (including Phnom Penh Municipality).
51
Table 6.2 Economic Activity Rate of the Disabled Population by Sex, Cambodia and Province,
2013
Economic Activity Rate (Percent)in
Cambodia/ Province
Both Sexes Males Females
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Cambodia 55.8 64.2 46.5
Banteay Meanchey 64.8 65.1 64.4
Battambang 49.3 58.7 38.7
Kampong Cham 48.3 62.6 33.3
Kampong Chhnang 63.3 68.5 55.8
Kampong Speu 63.6 79.8 49.7
Kampong Thom 58.2 62.3 53.8
Kampot 60.1 74.6 36.7
Kandal 66.0 64.8 66.9
Koh Kong 55.7 62.3 49.0
Kratie 54.6 64.1 45.0
Mondul Kiri 67.0 58.3 75.0
Phnom Penh 51.2 48.7 53.5
Preah Vihear 64.4 74.9 49.7
Prey Veng 52.3 60.2 45.5
Pursat 46.6 57.8 34.6
Ratanak Kiri 55.5 66.8 46.1
Siemreap 53.4 60.7 43.7
Preah Sihanouk 56.1 71.6 41.1
Stung Treng 65.5 72.8 50.6
Svay Rieng 53.3 56.1 48.3
Takeo 50.5 65.7 35.9
Otdar Meanchey 71.1 80.5 54.7
Kep 60.6 70.1 46.0
Pailin 65.7 77.5 36.4
In 2013 the economic activity rate varies over a wide range among the provinces. It ranges from 46.6 in
Pursat to 71.1 in Otdar Meanchey province for both sexes, from 57.8 in Pursat to 80.5 in Otdar
Meanchey province for males and from 34.6 in Pursat province to 66.9 in Kamdal province for females.
The Thirteen provinces having economic activity rate higher than that of the national level are: Banteay
Meanchey, Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Speu, Kampong Thom, Kampot, Kandal, Mondul Kiri, Preah
Vihear, Preah Sihanouk, Stung Treng, Otdar Meanchey, Kep and Pailin.
52
6.3 Economic Activity Rate by Type of Disability
Table 6.3 presents the percent distribution of the disabled population by type of disability, main activity
and sex for Cambodia for 2013. The percentage of economically active population is got by adding the
percentage of the employed and the unemployed. The percent distribution of the economically inactive
population by main activity (like home maker, student, dependent, income recipient and others) is
derived from this Table. For instance in 2013 in both sexes under the total disabled, the employed and
the unemployed form respectively 48.00 and 5.65 percent giving the economic activity rate of 53.65.
The economic inactivity rate for this population is, therefore, 46.35 percent. The percentage of home-
makers among the economically inactive population is calculated as the percentage of 7.74 to 46.35
which is 16.04 percent. The percentages of main activities of economically inactive persons are derived
from Table 6.4 in this manner.
Table 6.3 Percentage Distribution of Disabled Persons by Type of Disability, Main Activity and
Sex, Cambodia - Total, 2013
Home Maker
Unemployed
Dependent
Employed
Recipient
Student
Type of Disability Number Total
Income
Other
TOTAL DISABLED 2013
Both Sexes 289,917 100 49.9 5.9 7.7 5.9 24.7 4.4 1.5
In Seeing 99,811 100 56.6 5.2 9.9 7.2 17.4 3.5 0.2
In Speech 14,646 100 43.4 7.2 11.7 4.9 29.6 0.1 3.1
In Hearing 26,866 100 46.2 4.5 3.8 5.1 24.3 10.3 5.8
In Movement 98,361 100 56.7 4.6 5.7 5.2 22.6 4.6 0.7
Mental Retardation 15,198 100 22.6 8.4 9.7 7.9 46.7 3.5 1.3
Mental Illness 20,527 100 25.1 11.6 9.0 4.1 47.1 2.0 1.0
Other 9,869 100 45.7 11.5 9.2 4.8 20.2 4.1 4.4
Multiple Disabilities 4,638 100 13.7 7.2 0.0 3.7 52.5 11.7 11.2
Males 152,710 100 58.2 6.0 4.4 6.6 20.2 3.7 1.0
In Seeing 47,201 100 65.0 4.3 4.5 10.1 12.8 2.9 0.4
In Speech 6,446 100 39.9 10.6 6.2 4.1 36.1 0.0 3.2
In Hearing 11,621 100 56.6 6.2 3.8 3.8 17.6 10.2 1.8
In Movement 63,946 100 65.1 4.9 2.9 4.5 18.6 3.7 0.3
Mental Retardation 5,597 100 21.9 13.2 11.8 12.1 40.8 0.0 0.2
Mental Illness 9,545 100 26.6 12.5 7.9 6.5 44.1 2.4 0.0
Other 5,693 100 55.7 6.5 8.1 4.8 15.9 1.3 7.7
Multiple Disabilities 2,663 100 17.1 10.9 0.0 6.5 41.6 13.7 10.2
Females 137,206 100 40.7 5.8 11.5 5.1 29.8 5.1 2.0
In Seeing 52,611 100 49.0 6.0 14.8 4.6 21.5 4.0 0.1
In Speech 8,200 100 46.2 4.5 16.0 5.6 24.5 0.2 3.0
In Hearing 15,245 100 38.3 3.2 3.7 6.2 29.5 10.3 8.8
In Movement 34,415 100 41.1 3.9 10.9 6.5 30.0 6.1 1.5
Mental Retardation 9,601 100 23.0 5.6 8.5 5.5 50.1 5.5 1.9
Mental Illness 10,982 100 23.8 10.9 10.0 1.9 49.8 1.7 1.8
Other 4,176 100 32.2 18.3 10.7 4.8 26.0 8.0 0.0
Multiple Disabilities 1,975 100 9.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 67.1 9.1 12.4
53
Figure 6.1 Economic Activity Rates of Persons with Disability in the Age Group 15- 64 by Sex and
Residence, Cambodia, 2013
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Total Urban Rural
In 2013, Dependents constitute fifty-six percent of the economically inactive population among the
disabled. About 13.4 percent are students. Home makers form only about 17.4 percent. Among the
economically inactive disabled males, dependents, students and home makers form respectively 56.3
percent, 18.4 percent and 12.3 percent. Among the economically inactive disabled females, these
proportions are respectively 55.7 percent, 9.5 percent and 21.5 percent.
Under the total disabled population the proportion by main activity of economically inactive population
in each type of disability is describe below:
In the case of persons having disability in seeing, the economically active population constitutes 61.8
percent which is higher than 54.26 percent among the total disabled. Among the economically inactive
population dependents, students, home makers, income recipients like the retired, rent receivers etc., and
others form 45.5, 18.8, 25.9, 9.2 and 0.5 percent respectively.
In respect of other categories of disability also dependents predominate among the economically
inactive followed by students, home makers, income recipients and others in that order though the
percentages vary. It is observed that as in the case of the total population the proportions of the
economically inactive population by main activity are higher for females compared to the corresponding
proportions of males except in respect of students. The deviations from this pattern are:
The proportion of females is higher for students in the category of movement difficulty; for income
receivers in the category of speech disability; for others in the categories of hearing and mental
disabilities.
54
6.4 Economic Activity Rate of the Working Age Group
In the calculation of crude economic activity rate the whole population including young children and
very old persons are taken into account. It may be more appropriate to calculate the economic activity
rates for the working age group of 15-64 which is internationally used. Table 6.4 gives the economic
activity rates of the disabled population aged 15-64 at the national level.
Table 6.4 Economic Activity Rates of Disabled Population of Age 15- 64 by Sex and Urban Rural
Residence, Cambodia 2013
Number of
Economic
Residence and Sex Number of Disabled Economically Active
Activity Rates
Population
(1) (3) (4 (5)
Cambodia-Total
Both Sexes 205,116 142,131 69.29
Males 114,462 87,182 76.17
Females 90,654 54,950 60.62
Urban
Both Sexes 28,441 16,786 59.02
Males 14,695 9,294 63.25
Females 13,747 7,495 54.52
Rural
Both Sexes 176,676 125,343 70.95
Males 99,766 77,886 78.07
Females 76,908 47,457 61.71
For the general population of Cambodia in the age group 15-64 in 2013, the economic activity rates are
82.2 for total, 84.5 for males and 80.0 for females. The economic activity rates for the disabled
population in the same age group (Table 6.4) are lower than those of the general population. While the
economic activity rate for males is lower by 8.36 points, the economic activity rate for females is lower
by 19.37 points. The urban economic activity rates are lower than the corresponding rural rates as in the
case of the general population. The economic activity rates are 73.18, 79.46 and 67.36 for total, males
and females in the general population in the urban areas. The corresponding rural economic activity
rates are 84.85, 86.06 and 83.75 respectively. The gap between the economic activity rates of males
(76.17) and females (60.62) among the disabled population is much greater than the gap between the
two rates among the general population (84.5 for the males and 80.0 for the females).
55
Table 6.5 Unemployment Rates in the Age Group 15-64 of the General and Disabled Populations
by Sex and Residence, Cambodia, 2013
Economically Active Unemployment
Employed Unemployed
Population Rate (Percent)
Total/
Population
Population
Population
Population
Population
Population
Population
Population
Urban/
Disabled
Disabled
Disabled
Disabled
General
General
General
General
Rural
The unemployment rate, defined as the percentage of unemployed population to the economically active
population, has been calculated for the general population and the disabled population and presented in
Table 6.5.
The unemployment rate of the disabled population is much higher than that of the general population
both by sex and residence. In the urban areas the unemployment rates of both the general population and
the disabled population are higher as compared to the rural rates. This may be due to the fact that in the
rural areas agriculture absorbs a large proportion of workers. In the urban areas the unemployment rate
among the disabled population far surpasses that of the general population. In the urban areas the
unemployment rate of disabled females is higher than the unemployment rate of females in the general
population by as much as 374 in 2013
56
Table 6.6A Economic Activity Rates of Disabled Population Aged 15-64 by Sex: Province, 2013
Cambodia/Province Both Sexes Males Females
Cambodia 69.3 76.2 60.6
Banteay Meanchey 79.4 82.9 75.8
Battambang 64.8 74.2 51.8
Kampong Cham 61.2 78.2 45.5
Kampong Chhnang 83.0 82.3 84.3
Kampong Speu 81.3 94.0 66.1
Kampong Thom 73.1 76.7 68.7
Kampot 69.4 77.2 52.8
Kandal 75.0 66.7 83.3
Koh Kong 64.9 71.2 57.9
Kratie 74.4 80.2 67.3
Mondul Kiri 86.6 79.9 92.4
Phnom Penh 68.9 63.6 73.2
Preah Vihear 80.4 85.3 71.5
Prey Veng 63.7 73.3 54.4
Pursat 58.6 59.8 55.6
Ratanak Kiri 71.3 79.4 63.8
Siemreap 59.1 69.8 46.0
Sihanoukville 69.4 82.2 52.4
Stung Treng 78.3 85.3 63.6
Svay Rieng 65.9 65.1 67.6
Takeo 64.4 78.2 48.7
Oddar Meanchey 85.6 93.5 67.4
Kep 73.5 81.8 59.8
Pailin 79.6 86.1 56.2
Like the crude economic activity rate in 2013, the economic activity rate of the disabled population aged
15-64 also varies over a wide range among the provinces. It ranges from 61.2 in Kampong Cham to 86.6
in Mondul Kiri province for both sexes, from 63.6 in Phnom Penh Municipality to 86.1 in Pailin
province for males and from 45.5 in Kampong Cham to 92.4 in Mondul Kiri province for females.
6.5 Economic Activity Rates in other Age Groups
It is observed that among the disabled children (aged 0-14) 3.4 percent are economically active in 2013
(Table 6.1). As per computation form the Priority Tables C1 and E6, the percentage of economically
active disabled children in the age group 5-14 is 4.33 as against 2.39 among children of the same age
group in the country. The child labour rate among the disabled is therefore higher than that among the
general population. Special efforts are needed to mainstream the disabled children of varying disabilities
so as to eradicate child labour. It is also noticed that in both the age groups 15-59 and 60+ (Table 6.1)
the participation of women in economic activity is at a lower rate than their male counterparts, the
difference being higher in the older age group.
6.6 Employed Persons by Industrial Sector
A large majority of the employed disabled persons, work in agriculture, forestry and fishing (Table 6.7
based on a special tabulation) in 2013. The proportion of workers in this sector (72.64 percent) is higher
than that of the general population (64.3) by 8.3 percentage points.
57
In terms of industrial sectors 72.64 percent of the employed disabled persons are in the Primary Sector,
8.06 percent in the Secondary Sector and 19.32 percent in the Tertiary Sector. The corresponding
proportions of the employed among the general population are: 64.3 percent, 11.5 percent and 23.8
percent respectively.
Among the persons with disability the participation of women in the primary sector (70.65 percent) is
lower than that of men (73.89 percent). The shift from agriculture to industry and service activities has
taken place at a lesser pace among the employed persons who are disabled compared to the general
population.
Table 6.7 Percent Distribution of Employed Disabled Population by Industrial Sector and Sex,
Cambodia 2013
Percentage
Section Industrial Sector
Total Males Females
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Number 144,779 88,871 55,908
Total 100 100 100
A Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing 72.64 73.89 70.65
B Mining and Quarrying 0.00 0.00 0.00
C Manufacturing 5.38 4.29 7.11
Electricity, Gas, Steam and
D 0.00 0.00 0.00
Air-Con Supply
E Water supply, Sewerage etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00
F Construction 2.68 4.15 0.34
G Wholesale, Retail Trade etc. 8.99 5.62 14.34
H Transportation and Storage 1.34 2.14 0.06
Accommodation and Food Service
I 1.13 0.40 2.29
Activities
J Information and Communication 0.13 0.21 0.00
K Financial and Insurance Activities 0.00 0.00 0.00
L Real Estate 0.19 0.21 0.15
Professional, Scientific and Technical
M 0.57 0.50 0.68
Activities
Administrative and Support Service
N 3.16 4.88 0.42
Activities
Public Administration and Defense,
O 0.91 1.25 0.38
Social Security
P Education 0.12 0.19 0.00
Human Health and Social Work
Q 0.24 0.20 0.30
Activities
R Art, Entertainment and Recreation 2.24 1.93 2.74
S Other Service Activities 0.00 0.00 0.00
Use Activities of Household as
T 0.30 0.14 0.55
Employers
Activities of Extraterritorial
U 0.00 0.00 0.00
Organizations and Bodies
Not Stated 0.00 0.00 0.00
58
CHAPTER 7
Other Characteristics
The survey questions on fertility are available in Part 3 of the household questionnaire at Appendix II in
2013, of this report. In the absence of priority tables on fertility of women with disability, a special
tabulation was undertaken to fill the gap. The main results are presented below:
Based on the number of births during the 12 months preceding the census and survey date the total
fertility rate (TFR) for the sub-group of women with disability is arrived at as 0.87 live births per
woman during her reproductive period. The TFR of all women obtained from the census is 1.6.Both
these figures obviously indicate under estimates. In any population census and survey, there is always a
significant under reporting of live births when direct questions about births in the last 12 months are
asked. In view of this problem in census and survey data on live births the NIS applied indirect
techniques to 2013 data and obtained a range of plausible values of TFR (see NIS Analytical Report 1
on Fertility and Mortality in Cambodia 2013) and discussed them in the light of various evidences.
Based on these discussions the TFR for Cambodia was finally estimated as 2013 it was 2.8 per 1,000
live birth for the period (with reference period of March 2012- March 2013).(3.1 for rural and 2.2 for
urban)
At this juncture it would be appropriate to compare some of the relevant demographic indicators of the
disabled population with those of the general population derived from CIPS 2013.
Table 7.2 Selected demographic Indicators of the General Population and the Disabled
Populations, 2013
General Disabled
Demographic Indicators
Population Population
SMAM: Males 26.2 28.87
Females 23.7 27.63
Child Woman Ratio per 1,000 women in the age group 15-44 287 134
Median Age: Males 23.40 44.93
Females 25.77 47.01
Crude Birth Rate per 1,000 population 18.5 8.2
TFR 2.8 1.6
With this background and adopting the indirect method of estimation used in the Analytical Report 1 on
Fertility and Mortality in Cambodia the TFR of disabled women in Cambodia is estimated at 1.6 (1.68
for urban and 1.86 for rural) in 2013. These results confirm that the fertility level of disabled women is
much lower than the fertility level of women in Cambodia as a whole.
7.2 Mortality
At the CIPS 2013 though mortality data was collected for the total population, no separate mortality
related information in respect of persons with disability data was obtained. It is therefore not possible to
make an estimate of mortality levels of this special group. For the general population of Cambodia that
59
included the disabled population the infant mortality rate was estimated as 33 per 1,000 live births (9 for
urban areas and 38 for rural areas). The maternal mortality ratio is 250 per 100,000 live births ( 67 for
Urban and 299 for rural)
Table 7.3 Percentage of Disabled population who always lived in the place of enumeration to total
disabled population, Cambodia, 2013
Percentage
Residence
Both Sexes Males Females
Total 65.58 61.33 70.19
Urban 37.88 42.56 32.69
Rural 70.02 64.37 76.13
The number of migrants among the disabled persons in the urban areas in 2013 forms 21.2 percent of the
total number of disabled migrants. The sex ratios of total, urban and rural migrants among the disabled
population are: 125.5, 97.8 and 134.3. Among the total disabled population in the country the
corresponding sex ratios are: 108.6, 110.7 and 108.2. There is a predominant male population among the
disabled population and the disabled migrants, except in urban areas, the latter having much higher sex
ratios than the former in all the areas.
60
Figure 7.1 Migrants with disability by previous Residence, Cambodia 2013
As may be seen from Table 7.4, in 2013 most of the migrants have moved within the province of
enumeration. Among the general population also this is the position with 55.38 percent among them
having their previous residence within the province of enumeration.
Table 7.4 Distribution of Migrants with disability by Previous Residence, Cambodia, 2013
Previous Residence
Previous Residence
Both Sexes Males Females
Number of Migrants 128,921 71,739 57,182
Total 100 100 100
Within the province of enumeration 60.69 61.41 59.80
From another province 36.31 35.13 37.78
From outside Cambodia 3.00 3.46 2.42
In the urban areas about 34 percent of the disabled internal migrants are from other urban areas and 66
percent from rural areas. In the rural areas the corresponding percentages are 11 and 89.
Table 7.5 Percentage Distribution of Disabled Internal Migrants by Migration Stream,
Cambodia, 2013
Migration Both Sexes Males Females
Stream Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total 125,051 100 69,253 100 55,795 100
Rural to Rural 90,641 72.48 52,328 75.56 38,313 68.67
Rural to Urban 18,272 14.61 8,728 12.60 9,543 17.10
Urban to Rural 8,169 6.53 4,082 5.89 4,086 7.32
Urban to Urban 7,969 6.37 4,115 5.94 3,853 6.91
Rural to Rural migrants constitute the bulk of the total internal migrants among the disabled persons
(Table 7.5). The maximum proportion of disabled migrants has moved into their places of enumeration
20 years and more before the survey date of March 3, 2013 (Table 7.6). About 10 percent had migrated
to the places of enumeration less than five years before the survey date.
61
Table 7.6 Duration of Residence of Disabled Migrants in the Place of Enumeration, 2013
Total/ Duration of Residence
Urban/ Total
Rural Total <1 year 1-4 years 5-9 years 10-19 years 20+years
Migrants
Total 128,921 100 1.43 7.92 9.42 21.91 59.32
Urban 27,373 100 1.35 9.06 12.09 23.75 53.75
Rural 101,548 100 1.45 7.61 8.70 21.42 60.82
62
Chapter 8
Summary and Conclusions
The implementation of the welfare measures for the persons with disability depends on reliable data on
their population size and characteristics. In the absence of administrative data the number of disabled
persons with the types of their disabilities has to be estimated either by surveys or censuses. In
Cambodia, persons with disability constitute one of the most vulnerable groups. A considerable section
of the disabled population who are amputees or persons with mental disability is a constant and grim
reminder of the legacy of war and internal conflicts in the past. The passing of the law on Protection and
Promotion of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in July 2009 marked a milestone in the ceaseless
efforts of the Royal Government of Cambodia to protect and promote the rights of persons with
disabilities. There are several NGOs, national and international who have been taking longstanding
interest in improving the lives and livelihoods of persons with disabilities in the country. Yet there are
several challenges lying ahead in this regard.
At the CIPS 2013, a disability question was included in the household schedule questionnaire. If any
member of a household had any of the following types of disability, it was recorded; “in seeing”, “in
speech”, “in hearing”, “in movement”,and in “mental disability” there are some specification in mental
retardation, mental illness, “Other” and “multiple disability”. If a person had two or more types of
disability of these was recorded by the enumerator according to the acceptation of respondent. Due to
differences in the definition of disability the number of disabled as per the surveys may differ from the
estimates made by other surveys.
The number of persons with disability, or the disabled population in Cambodia is 301,629 according to
CIPS 2013. These are based on the definitions adopted for CIPS (see the definition in the general
report). It includes 157,008 males in 2013.( 52.05 percent) and 144,622 females (47.95 percent).
The disabled population constitutes in 2013, 2.06 percent for the whole country’s population of
14,676,591 (1.07 percent among males and 0.99 percent among females)
In the survey the disability rate which gives the extent of disability in each area is the highest in
Kampong Chhnang(3.74), Kampong Thom(3.36), Preah Sihanouk(3.55), Otdar Meanchey (3.54). The
disability rate is much higher than the national average in each of the provinces of Battambang,
Kampong Chhnang, Kampong Thom, Koh Kong, Kratie , Prey Veng, Preah Sihanouk, Takeo, Otdar
Meanchey and Pailin. This is mainly due to the fact that Pailin was one of those provinces in the
Northwest that were seriously affected by war and civil disturbances during the Khmer Rouge regime.
For the same reason, perhaps, the disability rate is much higher than the national average in each of the
provinces (Table 3.2). In each of the remaining provinces the disability rate is less than the national
average.
The disability rate is higher in the rural areas than in the urban areas at the national level.
Sex ratio of the disabled population at the national level is 101.6 as against 94.3 among the general
population indicating a higher proportion of males among the disabled population in the country. The
urban and rural sex ratios of the disabled population are 91.6 and 107.8 respectively; they were lower
than the corresponding of 125.7. The sex ratio of the disabled population at province level varies over a
wide range from 80.9 in Prey Veng and 83.2 in Mondul Kiri to 218.1 and 230.5 in Pailin in 2013.
The working age group accounts for 67.99 percent of the disabled population whereas among the
general population it constitutes 65.6 percent. In 2013, the proportions of the elderly among the disabled
63
population and the general population are 21.37 percent and 5.0 percent respectively. In the age group
35–39 in 2013, a decline in the population may be observed (see Figure 4.1). This is due to decline in
fertility and high mortality during the Khmer Rouge period.
In 2013, the median age of the disabled population works out to 45.76 years as against 24.52 years for
the population of Cambodia as a whole. The median ages of males and females among the disabled
population are 44.93 and 47.01 respectively; the corresponding median ages among the general
population are 23.40 and 25.77 respectively. The median ages of the disabled population in the urban
and rural areas are calculated as 44.22 and 45.96 respectively higher than the corresponding of 33.71
and 36.90 respectively (Table 4.5).
In general, those who suffer from different physical handicaps are mostly in the age cohort 15-29 which
represents people born during the troubled years 1979-1993 following the Khmer Rouge regime.
Disabilities in vision, in hearing, in movement other and multiple disabilities acquired are more
prevalent among the older age groups. Following the age group 15-29, children in the age group 0-14
have a high proportion of mentally disabled persons. These characteristics are noticed in most of the
provinces also on examining the priority Table E1 (not published in this report).
In 2013 among the persons with disability aged 15 and over as a whole it is observed that 26.87 percent,
is never married as against the corresponding percentage of 31.14, among the general population. The
percentage widowed (13.63) among the disabled population (aged 15+) is much higher than that of the
general population (5.03) in 2013. This is mainly because the disabled population is an “old population”
whereas the general population is comparatively younger. The percentage of divorced among disabled
women (2.42 percent) is also higher than that in the general population (1.76 percent). The percentages
of never married among males and females aged 15+ in the general population are 35.31 and 27.40
respectively. The corresponding percentages among the disabled population are 24.64 and 29.33.The
proportion of never married decreases with the increase in age. However about 90 percent of the
disabled population are already married by the age of 45 whereas such a situation is reached by the
general population even by the age of 30.
In the higher age for women, from the age group 55-59 upwards, the proportion of widowed is
substantially high and it increases with age. These old and physically challenged widows constitute the
most vulnerable group who need assistance and support. In the higher age groups males marry much
younger women either for the first time or as remarriage once they are widowed, divorced or separated.
This tendency does not exist among older women. In all the age groups the proportion of widows is
higher, with its rise being faster compared to that of widowers. This is due to the following reasons: (i)
wives are generally younger than their husbands (ii) the expectation of life is higher for women than
men (iii) men tend to remarry at a proportion very much higher than that of women. The Singulate Mean
Age at Marriage (SMAM) of the disabled population is much higher than that of the general population.
as may be seen from Table 4.11 in 2013. Marriage among the disabled population seems to be relatively
delayed.
Noticed that the literacy level of the disabled population for females is lower than that of the disabled
population for total and males. There is an exception in speech: the literacy level of the disabled
population for females is higher than that of the disabled population for total and males.
Table 5.2 gives in 2013 the literacy level of the disabled population aged 7 and over in the provinces
(including Phnom Penh Municipality) for total disabled population. The literacy rates vary from
province to province. The lowest rates are recorded in Mondul Kiri province and the highest in Kandal
for total, males and females. The literacy levels in the following provinces are each above the national
64
average of 58.03: Banteay Meanchey, Battambang, Kampong Speu, Kandal, Kratie, Phnom Penh, Siem
Reap, Preah Sihanouk , Kep and Pailin. In each of the remaining provinces the literacy level is lower
than the national level.
Barring older age groups, the adult literacy rate is at its lowest level in the age group 30-34 which
contains persons born during the Khmer Rouge period (Figure 5.2). The highest level of adult literacy is
seen the age group 50-54 followed by the age group 55-59. The persons belonging to these age groups
are those born during the year 1951-56. Presumably progressive measures were taken to improve
education after the country became independent during this period.
Among the total literate population with disability in 2013, the proportions of those who have completed
Primary level of education (25.0 percent) and Lower secondary level (17 percent) (see Table 5.4) are
lower than the corresponding proportions of the general population, namely, 29.4 percent and 21 percent
respectively, given in the National Report on the Final CIPS Results released in 2013. Those who have
the qualification of Secondary School/Baccalaureate level and beyond constitute hardly 1 percent as
against about 2 percent among the general population. The literacy and educational levels of female
disabled persons are generally lower than those of male disabled population. In each of the educational
level categories of “None” and Primary not completed the percentage of females is higher than that of
males.
The rural proportions for primary not completed and primary completed are higher than the
corresponding urban proportions. In the higher educational levels, however, the trend is reversed as
expected. It is possible that in the urban areas a portion of primary completed persons might have moved
to Lower Secondary whereas their counterparts in the rural areas might have stopped with Primary
completed level without pursuing higher education.
With an average of 33.98 percent in 2013(Table 5.13) at the national level, the proportion of males who
have completed the primary level of education ranges from 13.32 in Koh Kong province to 57.13 in
Banteay Meanchey province. The percentages of females at that level varies from 0.00 in Mondul Kiri
and Svay Rieng provinces to 45.39 in Pailin province, the national average being 25.06 percent. In
respect of Lower Secondary level the proportion of persons ranges from nil in Banteay Meanchey,
Kampong Speu, Koh Kong, Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, and Pursat provinces to 15.23 in Ratanak Kiri
province. The proportion of persons who have completed Secondary/Technical Diploma varies from
1.71 in Banteay Meanchey province to 19.64 in Preah Sihanouk province. In Kampong Cham, Kandal,
Koh Kong, Mondul Kiri, Prey Veng, Pursat, and Takeo provinces there are no females among the
disabled with Secondary/Technical Diploma level qualification. The proportions of disabled persons
who have completed a level of education beyond Secondary/Technical Diploma like under graduate and
graduate, are very poor in all the provinces with nil in the provinces of Banteay Meanchey, Battambang
Kampong Cham, Kampong Chhnang, Koh Kong, Kratie, Mondul Kiri, Preah Vihear, Prey Veng, Pursat,
Ratanak Kiri, Siem Reap, Stung Treng, Svay Rieng, Takeo and Otdar Meanchey, and with Phnom Penh
Municipality recording 6.77 percent at the other end.
In 2013 the literacy levels of persons with disabilities in seeing, in movement and in other are higher
than the national average of 58.03 (Table 5.11) for the total disabled population. The literacy rate of
disabled in hearing is 28 percent points less than the national average. The literacy rates of those
disabled in speech (46.86), the literacy rate of persons mentally illness disabled (48.07) and the literacy
rate of persons in multiple disabled (44.70) are much below the national average. The literacy rates of
those disabled in mental retardation (26.08) is the most less than other type of disabilities and the
65
national average. The literacy rate is higher among the persons who became mentally illness disabled
than that of the disabled persons in mental retardation in respect of movement and mental disabilities. In
the other three categories of disability the opposite trend is noticed. The educational levels of persons in
each type of disability are also presented in Table 5.11.
In the case of mentally disabled, some explanation seems necessary: Since some mentally disabled
persons have literacy and educational attainment, the following situations are feasible:
In 2013 crude economic activity rates (the percentage of the economically active population to the total
population) or simply economic activity rates (unless stated otherwise in this chapter) for the general
population of Cambodia and the disabled population are 56.78 and 53.65 respectively. For males and
females among the general population the economic activity rates are 57.75 and 55.86. The
corresponding proportions among the disabled population are 62.43 and 44.13 respectively. It shows that
women with disability participate in economic activity on a lesser scale than their counterparts in the
general population. This trend is reversed in respect of males.
The economic activity rates of the disabled population in mental illness are generally higher than those
of disabled population in mental retardation except in the older ages (60+). However in the age group
15-59 for females disabled in mental illness the economic activity rate is slightly lower than the
corresponding rate under disabled in mental retardation (Tables 6.1 and 6.2).
In 2013,Dependents constitute fifty-six percent of the economically inactive population among the
disabled. About 13.4 percent are students. Home makers form only about 17.4 percent. Among the
economically inactive disabled males, dependents, students and home makers form respectively 56.3
percent, 18.4 percent and 12.3 percent. Among the economically inactive disabled females, these
proportions are respectively 55.7 percent, 9.5 percent and 21.5 percent.
For the general population of Cambodia in the age group 15-64 in 2013, the economic activity rates are
82.2 for total, 84.5for males and 80.00 for females. The economic activity rates for the disabled
population in the same age group (Table 6.5) are lower than those of the general population. While the
economic activity rate for males is lower by 8.36 points, the economic activity rate for females is lower
by 19.37 points. The urban economic activity rates are lower than the corresponding rural rates as in the
case of the general population. The economic activity rates are 73.18, 79.86 and 67.36 for total, males
and females in the general population in the urban areas. The corresponding rural economic activity
rates are 84.85, 86.06 and 83.75 respectively. The gap between the economic activity rates of males
(76.17) and females (60.62) among the disabled population is much greater than the gap between the
two rates among the general population (84.5 for the males and 80.00 for the females).
Like the crude economic activity rate in 2013, the economic activity rate of the disabled population aged
15-64 also varies over a wide range among the provinces. It ranges from 61.2 in Kampong Cham to 86.6
in Mondul Kiri province for both sexes, from 63.6 in Phnom Penh Municipality to 86.1 in Pailin
province for males and from 45.5 in Kampong Cham to 92.4 in Mondul Kiri province for females.
66
The proportion of children in the labour force is slightly higher among the disabled population (about 4
percent) compared to general population (about 2 percent) in 2013. Special efforts are needed to
mainstream the disabled children of varying disabilities so as to eradicate child labour. It is also noticed
that in both the age groups 15-59 and 60+ the participation of women in economic activity is at a lower
rate than their male counterparts, the difference being higher in the older age group.
A large majority of the employed disabled persons, work in agriculture, forestry and fishing (Table 6.7
based on a special tabulation) in 2013. The proportion of workers in this sector (72.64 percent) is higher
than that of the general population (64.3) by 8.3 percentage points.
In terms of industrial sectors 72.64 percent of the employed disabled persons are in the Primary Sector,
8.06 percent in the Secondary Sector and 19.32 percent in the Tertiary Sector. The corresponding
proportions of the employed among the general population are: 64.3 percent, 11.5 percent and 23.8
percent respectively.
Among the persons with disability the participation of women in the primary sector (70.65 percent) is
lower than that of men (73.89 percent). The shift from agriculture to industry and service activities has
taken place at a lesser pace among the employed persons who are disabled compared to the general
population.
Adopting the indirect method of estimation used in the Analytical Report 1 on Fertility and Mortality in
Cambodia the TFR of disabled women in Cambodia is estimated at 1.6 (1.68 for urban and 1.86 for
rural). These results confirm that the fertility level of disabled women is much lower than the fertility
level of women in Cambodia as a whole.
The migration rate is higher for the disabled population (42.74 percent) compared to the general
population (28.45 percent) in 2013. In both the populations the migration rate of the urbanites is very
much higher than that of the rural residents. A little more than one third of the persons with disability
never had a residence other than the place where they were enumerated. Most of the migrants have
moved within the province of enumeration. Among the general population also this is the position with
55.38 percent among them having their previous residence within the province of enumeration.
One among three disabled persons (38 percent) is heading a household in 2013. About 54 percent among
males and 20.7 percent among females are heads of households. The highest percentage of male heads
of household is found in the age group 45-49. The corresponding age group for females is 55-59. The
heads of household with disability, especially women among them are one of the vulnerable groups who
need support.
67
APPENDIX
APPENDIX I
71
APPENDIX II
72
73
74
75
76
77
APPENDIX III
Cambodia Inter-Censal Population Survey 2013 (CIPS 2013)
List of Priority Tables
The List of Priority Tables for CIPS is drawn from the corresponding List of 2008 Census with some
revisions, additions and deletions in view of the various changes in the questionnaire. The following List
contains the old Tables, the new Tables and the revised Tables as indicated.
78
37. E2 (Revised) Physically/Mentally Disabled Persons by Category of Disability, Marital Status and Sex.
38. E3 (Revised) Physically/Mentally Disabled Persons by Literacy in any language, Level of Education, 5-year Age Group
and Sex.
39. E3A (Revised) Physically/Mentally Disabled Persons by Category of Disability, Literacy in any Language, Level of
Education and Sex.
40. E4 (Revised) Physically/Mentally Disabled Persons by Main Activity, 5-year Age Group and Sex.
41. E4A (Revised) Physically/Mentally Disabled Persons by Category of Disability, Main Activity and Sex.
(vi) F Series. Fertility Tables
42. F1 Females aged 15 to 49 bearing children during last year by 5-year Age Group, Educational level and Births during last
year by Birth order.
43. F2 Females aged 15 to 49 bearing children during last year by 5-year Age Group, Usual Activity Status and Births during
last year by Birth order.
44. F3 Females aged 15 and over by Parity, Total Children Ever Born, 5-year Age Group and Educational Level.
45. F4 Females aged 15 and over by Parity, Total Children Ever Born, 5-year Age Group and Usual Activity Status.
46. F5 Females aged 15 and over by Number of Surviving Children, 5-year Age Group and Educational level.
47. F6 Females aged 15 and over by Number of Surviving Children, 5-year Age Group and Usual Activity Status.
48. F7 Females aged 15 to 49 bearing children during last year by 5-year Age Group and Type of Assistance during Delivery.
49. F8 (New) Registration of Birth in the last year by Educational Level of Mother
50. F9. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Marriage and Current Age
51. F10. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Marriage and by Number of Children Ever Born
52. F11. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Marriage and Number of Children Ever Born
53. F12. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Parity, Total Children Ever Born, Age at First Marriage
54. F13. (New) Children Living with Own Mother by Age and Age of Mother
55. F14. (New) Females Aged 15 and above Living with Own Children by Parity, Total children Ever Born and Age
56. F15. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Child Birth and Current Age
57. F16. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Child Birth and Number of Children Ever Born
58. F17. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Age at First Child Birth and Number of Children
59. F18. (New) Ever Married Females Aged 15 and above by Parity, Total Children Ever Born, Age at First Child
60. F19. (New) Ever Married Population by Age at First Married and Sex of Respondent
(vii) G Series. Mortality Tables
61. G1 Population, Number of Deaths in Households in the last year by broad Age Group and Sex.
62. G2 Deaths in Households in the last year by Cause of Death, broad Age Group and Sex.
63. G3 Maternal Deaths by Type of Assistance, Place of Death and 5-year Age Group.
64. G4. (New) Number of Deaths in Households in the Year by Death Registration, Broad Age Groups and Sex
(viii) H Series. Household and Housing Amenity Tables
65. H1 Buildings/Structures with Households by Type of Use.
66. H2 Buildings/Structures (Residential + Partly Residential) by Predominant material of Roof, Wall and Floor.
67. H3 Households by Tenure Status of Dwelling, Household Size and Number of Rooms Occupied.
68. H4 Households by Size of Households, Number of Economically Active Members and Sex of Head of Household
69. H5 Head of Households (aged 10 and over) by Usual Activity Status, 5-year Age Group and Sex.
70. H6 Households by Main source of Light used and Household Size.
71. H7 Households by Type of Fuel used for Cooking and Household Size.
72. H8 Households classified by Main source of Drinking Water, Location of Source and Household Size.
73. H9 Households by Tenure Status of Dwelling and Toilet Facility Category.
74. H10 Households and Population (in 10,000's) by Tenure Status of Dwelling, Availability of Electric Power and Toilet
Facility.
75. H11 Households classified by source of Drinking Water, Availability of Electric Power and Toilet Facility.
76. H12 (Revised) Households by Type and Number of Assets owned.
77. H13 (Revised) Households by Household Size and Access to Internet.
78. H14 (New) Households with Separate Kitchen by Household Size and Number of Rooms Occupied
Note: The lowest level of presentation of all tables is Province except Tables D2 and D3 which are presented at National Level
79
PPENDIX V
GLOSSARY
Percentage of literate population aged 15 and more to total population aged 15 and more in a
given area.
Age
The percentage of population in the younger (0-14) and older (65 +) age groups to population in
the age group 15-64.
Percentage of economically active population in an age group to total population in that age group
The number of births to women of a given age group per 1,000 women in that age group
ୣ ୲ െ ୣ ୭
ൌ
୲ ൌ ୭ ୰୲
80
Where, Po is the population at the base year, Pt is the population at year 't' and 't' is the number of
years between Po and Pt. Here the compounding with the rate of growth 'r' is done on a
continuous basis.
This is the average number of persons in normal or regular households (i.e. excluding institutional
and homeless households and households of boat and transient population).
Building
Building refers generally to a single structure on the ground. Sometimes it is made up of more
than one component unit which are used or likely to be used as dwelling (residence) or
establishments such as shops, business houses, offices, factories, workshops, work sheds, schools,
place of entertainments, place of worship, stores, etc. It is also possible that buildings, which have
components units, may be used for a combination of purpose such as shop-cum-residence,
workshop-cum-residence, office-cum-residence, etc.
Child-Woman Ratio
This is the ratio of children under 5 years old in a population to women in the age group 15-49. It
is computed by dividing the number of children aged 0-4 in the population by the number of
women aged 15-49.
81
Dwelling
Educational Level
Persons with main activity as employed or unemployed during the reference period of one year
preceding the census date.
Percentage of economically active population to total population within the age group 15-64
Persons other than the economically active during the reference period of one year preceding the
census date.
Employed
Comprises persons who were in the following categories for 6 months (183 days) or more during
the one year preceding the census date:
(i) Persons who were in paid employment (e.g. working in public or private organization etc). (ii)
Persons who, during the reference period, performed some work for wage, salary, profit or family
gain in cash or kind. (iii) Persons who did not do any work for pay or profit during the reference
period although they had a job to which they could return. (e.g. off season workers like farmers or
fishermen), those on sick leave or leave without pay, those who could not work due to strike or
lockout in the organization they were working. (iv) Persons who were self-employed (e.g.
Running a shop by himself or herself, selling eatables, practicing as doctors, lawyer etc)
82
Fertility
Gender
Refers to roles, attitudes and values assigned by culture and society to women and men
Gender Equity
Literacy Rate
This is calculated as percentage of literate persons to total population excluding children aged 0 to 6.
Head of Household
For survey purposes he or she is a person who is recognized as such in household. He or she is
generally the person who bears the chief responsibility for management of the household and
takes decisions on behalf of the household. The head of household need not necessarily be the
oldest member, but may be a female member or a younger member of either sex. The name of the
person who is recognized by the household as its head was recorded in the census. In the case of
an absentee de jure “Head”, the person who was responsible for managing the affairs of the
household was regarded as the Head for the census purpose.
Household
A group of persons who commonly live together and would take meals from a common kitchen
unless the exigencies of work prevented any of them from doing so.
Infant Mortality Rate is the number of deaths of infants under age one year per 1,000 live births in
a given year.
83
Industrial Sector
Industry (or branch of economic activity) refers to the activity of the establishment or enterprise
in which the individual works. Industries are grouped according to following sectors:
Primary Sector: Section A (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) of the International Standard
Industrial Classification (ISIC)
Tertiary Sector: Sector G (Wholesale and Retail Trade, Repair of Motor Vehicles and
Motorcycles), H (Transportation and Storage), I (Accommodation and Food Service Activities), J
(Information and Communication), K (Financial and Insurance Activities), L (Real Estate), M
(Professional, Scientific and Technical Activities), N (Administrative and Support Service
Activities), O (Public Administration and Defense, Social Security), P (Education), Q (Human
Health and Social Work Activities), R (Art, Entertainment and Recreation), S (Other Service
Activities), T (Use Activities of Household as Employers), U (Activities of Extraterritorial
Organizations and Bodies) of the International Standard Industrial Classification (ISIC)
Lifetime Migration
Migration status of persons as determined by comparing the place of birth with place of residence
Literacy
Refers to the ability to read and write with understanding in any language. In CIPS 2013,
information on literacy in Khmer language and literacy in any other language was ascertained
from respondent. By definition all children of the age of 6 years or less are treated as illiterate.
Live Birth
This refers to the complete expulsion (delivery) or extraction from its mother of a product of
conception (baby), irrespective of the duration of pregnancy. The baby after such separation
breathes or shows other evidence of life, such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical
cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, whether or not the umbilical cord has been cut
or the placenta is attached. Each product of such birth is considered as live birth.
84
Main Activity during Last Year
The activity of a person during 6 months (183 days) or more in the one year preceding the
reference date of the census.
Maternal Mortality
This refers to the number of women who die while pregnant, during delivery or within 42 days
after delivery.
Median Age
It is defined as the age, which divides the population into two equal size groups, one of which is
younger and the other of which older than the median.
Migration
This is the process of changing residence from one geographical location to another. In the 2008
Census it meant shifting residence by the person enumerated from another village or country
(which was his/her previous residence) to the village in which he/she was enumerated.
Myer’s Index
This is a measure of heaping on individual ages or terminal digits. The tendency of enumerators
or respondents to report certain ages at the expense of others is called age heaping, age preference
or digit preference (e.g. ages ending in 0 or 5). The theoretical range of Myer’s index extends
from the minimum of 0, when there is neither preference nor avoidance of any particular digit at
all, to the maximum of 90 when all ages are reported in a single terminal digit.
85
Nature of Industry, Trade or Service
Refers to the sector of economy in which a person worked. Examples are: Cultivation, fishing,
livestock rearing, selling of vegetables, automobile repairs, manufacture of toys, transport service,
school or educational service, sale of clothes (retail), manufacture of eatables etc. If a person
works as sales assistant in a Gas Station his occupation is sales person and the nature of his trade
is retail sale of petrol.
Occupation
The name of the job a person does (e.g. cashier, primary school teacher, nurse, blacksmith,
watchman, manager etc.)
Physical/Mental Disability
Population Density
The Enumeration Areas (EAs) of 2008 General Population census of Cambodia which were
updated for use in CIPS 2013
Rural
(i) For persons employed for the major part of the year preceding the survey (i.e. main
activity employed) this refers to a second job or activity which gave him/her additional
income in cash or kind.
86
(ii) In respect of others (i.e. unemployed or economically inactive for the major part of the
year preceding the census date) it refers to some job or activity undertaken to earn income
in cash or kind. In other words it is their marginal work.
Sex Ratio
It compares the age-specific proportions of those who are never married with those who are ever-
married calculating the mean age at which the transition between the two states was made. For
details of the methodology developed by John Hajnal, please see " The Methods and Materials of
Demography" by Shryock and Siegel.
The total fertility rate is the number of children which a woman of hypothetical cohort would bear
during her life time if she were to bear children throughout her life at the rates specified by the
schedule of age specific fertility rates for the particular year and if none of them dies before
crossing the age of reproduction. Therefore Total fertility rate is the number of births a woman
would have if she experienced a given set of age specific birth rates throughout her reproductive
span. It is the sum of age-specific fertility rates.
It is the sum of (i) the mean deviation of the age ratio for males from 100 (ii) the mean deviation
of the age ratios for females from 100 and (iii) three times the mean of the age-to-age differences
in reported sex ratios. In this procedure the age ratio is defined as the ratio of the population in a
given age group to one-half the sum of population in the preceding and following groups.
Unemployed
Persons who were without employment, but were seeking employment or available for
employment, for 6 months (183 days) or more during the one year preceding the census date.
87
Urban
Urban areas are based on the criteria adopted in the “Reclassification of Urban Areas in Cambodia, 2011”
(February 2012) published by the National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Phnom Penh
This refers to the main activity status of a person during the one year preceding the census date as
employed, unemployed or economically not active.
Whipple’s Index
Whipple’s Index is a measure of preference for ages ending in 0 and 5. Its range is from 100,
indicating no preference for 0 and 5, up to 500 indicating that only 0 and 5 were reported.
88
Annex Table 1 Number of Disabled Persons and Proportion to Total Population by Sex: Province
2013
Year Population Number of Disabled Percentage of Disabled
Province/District
Total Males Females Total Males Females Total Males Females
Cambodia 2013 14,676,591 7,121,508 7,555,083 301,629 157,007 144,622 2.06 2.20 1.91
Banteay Meanchey 2013 741,334 360,399 380,935 13,898 7,020 6,878 1.90 1.98 1.83
Battambang 2013 1,141,243 567,121 574,122 32,123 16,422 15,702 2.87 2.95 2.78
Kampong Cham 2013 1,792,427 853,138 939,288 31,720 16.063 15.656 1.81 1.81 1.70
Kampong Chhnang 2013 534,850 255,983 278,868 19.558 11,647 7,912 3.74 4.65 2.90
Kampong Speu 2013 771,441 371,231 400,210 12,117 5,562 6,555 1.60 1.53 1.67
Kampong Thom 2013 705,903 341,219 364,683 23,172 11,888 11,284 3.36 3.56 3.17
Kampot 2013 624,796 310,223 314,573 12,406 7,626 4,780 2.03 2.51 1.55
Kandal 2013 1,115,965 538,040 577,924 17,842 8,287 9,555 1.60 1.54 1.65
Koh Kong 2013 124,312 62,196 62,116 2,575 1,274 1,300 2.11 2.08 2.13
Kratie 2013 350,946 170,652 180,294 9,310 4,628 4,682 2.70 2.76 2.65
Mondul Kiri 2013 74,117 37,837 36,280 742 337 405 1.02 0.91 1.14
Phnom Penh 2013 1,688,044 816,145 871,900 14,074 6,673 7,401 0.83 0.82 0.85
Preah Vihear 2013 240,017 119,046 120,971 3,959 2,264 1,695 1.68 1.94 1.43
Prey Veng 2013 1,180,273 569,613 610,661 25,301 11,315 13,987 2.19 2.03 2.34
Pursat 2013 444,470 212,631 231,839 7,031 3,752 3,280 1.61 1.80 1.44
Ratanak Kiri 2013 187,480 93,198 94,282 2,193 1,024 1,170 1.19 1.12 1.27
Siem Reap 2013 944,372 457,764 486,607 22,434 12,793 9,642 2.43 2.86 2.03
Preah Sihanouk 2013 203,155 99,788 103,367 8,872 4,366 4,506 3.55 3.55 3.54
Stung Treng 2013 124,749 63,257 61,492 1,177 807 370 0.96 1.30 0.61
Svay Rieng 2013 590,051 291,888 298,163 10,854 7,004 3,850 1.88 2.45 1.32
Takeo 2013 942,186 449,719 492,467 19,664 9,487 10,176 2.13 2.15 2.11
Oddar Meanchey 2013 235,922 118,339 117,583 8,196 5,143 3,053 3.54 4.43 2.65
Kep 2013 39,495 19,414 20,082 685 423 262 1.77 2.22 2.22
Pailin 2013 67,181 33,528 33,653 1,725 1,203 522 2.62 3.66 1.58
89
Annex Table 2.A Disabled Persons by Type of Disability (Both Sexes): Cambodia, Province 2013
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement
Retardation Illness Other Disabilities
(15) (16)
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
Cambodia
Total 301,629 105,059 16,237 27,260 100,819 15,613 21,122 10,620 4,899
Urban 41,649 17,365 1,959 4,243 10,854 2,870 2,197 1,309 852
Rural 259,981 87,694 14,279 23,016 89,965 12,743 18,925 9,312 4,047
Banteay Meanchey
Total 13,898 7,392 422 589 3,669 724 433 228 443
Battambang
Total 32,123 8,993 1,948 2,359 11,085 2,026 2,653 2,085 974
Kampong Cham
Total 31,720 10,509 1,421 3,485 11,365 1,774 2,835 331 -
Kampong Chhnang
Total 19,558 8,187 734 1,574 6,302 803 1,350 566 43
90
Kampong Speu
Total 12,117 4,902 535 1,402 3,851 603 460 206 158
Kampong Thom
Total 23,172 7,764 1,999 1,916 8,611 437 1,310 1,049 86
Kampot
Total 12,406 3,005 759 1,110 5,578 661 632 661 12,406
Kandal
Total 17,842 9,555 402 856 3,862 722 1,751 348 346
Koh Kong
Total 2,575 1,017 178 105 1,034 100 76 34 31
Kratie
Total 9,310 4,366 303 947 2,539 317 456 227 155
Mondul Kiri
Total 742 144 51 190 236 49 71 - -
Phnom Penh
Total 14,074 4,875 959 2,568 3,310 945 924 214 279
Preah Vihear
Total 3,959 994 298 562 1,550 91 333 - 131
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement
Retardation Illness Other Disabilities
(15) (16)
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14)
Prey Veng
Total 25,301 8,842 1,276 1,337 7,299 1,999 2,350 849 1,350
Pursat
Total 7,031 1,470 534 850 2,543 479 386 662 107
Ratanak Kiri
Total 2,193 760 191 226 640 72 113 191 -
Siem Reap
Total 22,434 5,319 857 1,717 10,114 1,749 1,242 1,251 184
Preah Sihanouk
Total 8,872 5,844 193 584 1,929 177 113 32 -
Stung Treng
Total 1,177 311 104 178 435 38 112 - -
Svay Rieng
Total 10,854 2,579 748 1,609 3,049 770 1,291 616 192
91
Takeo
Total 19,664 4,783 1,929 2,555 6,875 767 1,777 775 203
Otdar Meanchey
Total 8,196 2,808 285 427 3,699 192 348 258 180
Kep
Total 685 168 8 65 347 40 25 26 8
Pailin
Total 1,725 473 104 50 897 77 81 12 30
Annex Table 2.B Disabled Persons by Type of Disability (Males): Cambodia, Province 2013
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement
Retardation Illness Other Disabilities
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)
Cambodia
Total 157,007 49,216 6,898 11,621 65,059 5,717 9,710 6,124 2,663
Urban 21,886 8,360 506 2,815 6,303 1,460 1,379 521 542
Rural 135,123 40,856 6,392 8,806 58,756 4,257 8,332 5,603 2,121
Banteay Meanchey
Total 7,020 2,815 288 262 2,470 445 185 112 443
Battambang
Total 16,422 3,811 988 621 6,685 725 1,087 1,713 791
Kampong Cham
Total 16,063 4,770 310 1,463 7,942 338 1,240 - -
Kampong Chhnang
Total 11,647 3,692 348 997 4,515 744 1,015 336 -
Kampong Speu
Total 5,562 1,932 239 377 2,252 504 258 - -
Kampong Thom
92
Total 11,888 2,889 963 831 5,811 109 490 794 -
Kampot
Total 7,626 1,888 369 761 3,496 123 422 567 -
Kandal
Total 8,287 4,714 217 494 1,793 175 373 348 173
Koh Kong
Total 1,274 486 44 40 599 34 39 34 -
Kratie
Total 4,628 1,721 60 503 1,878 60 140 180 85
Mondul Kiri
Total 337 78 26 49 116 42 26 - -
Phnom Penh
Total 6,673 2,317 - 2,013 1,532 347 464 - -
Preah Vihear
Total 2,264 507 228 114 1,094 62 181 - 79
Prey Veng
Total 11,315 4,204 555 455 3,900 291 1,161 203 544
Pursat
Total 3,752 686 147 303 1,828 132 200 455 -
Ratanak Kiri
Total 1,024 427 24 54 386 - 62 70 -
Siem Reap
Total 12,793 3,079 395 260 7,218 529 672 455 184
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement
Retardation Illness Other Disabilities
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)
Preah Sihanouk
Total 4,366 2,696 193 224 1,090 98 33 32 -
Stung Treng
Total 807 192 88 51 385 16 74 - -
Svay Rieng
Total 7,004 2,015 489 571 2,221 521 657 338 192
Takeo
Total 9,487 2,594 693 878 4,241 291 591 200 -
Otdar Meanchey
Total 5,143 1,305 147 243 2,707 72 267 258 144
Kep
Total 423 94 8 41 216 24 17 17 8
Pailin
Total 1,203 304 80 14 684 33 55 12 21
93
Annex Table 2.C Disabled Persons by Type of Disability (Females): Cambodia, Province 2013
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Retardatio Mental Disabilitie
n Illness Other s
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)
Cambodia
Total 144,622 55,843 9,339 15,639 35,760 9,896 11,412 4,497 2,236
Urban 19,765 9,005 1,453 1,429 4,551 1,410 819 788 310
Rural 124,858 46,838 7,887 14,210 31,209 8,486 10,593 3,709 1,926
Banteay Meanchey
Total 6,878 4,576 134 326 1,199 279 248 116 -
Battambang
Total 15,702 5,181 960 1,739 4,400 1,301 1,566 372 183
Kampong Cham
Total 15,656 5,740 1,111 2,022 3,422 1,437 1,594 331 -
Kampong Chhnang
Total 7,912 4,495 386 576 1,787 59 335 230 43
Kampong Speu
Total 6,555 2,970 296 1,025 1,598 99 202 206 158
Kampong Thom
94
Total 11,284 4,875 1,036 1,085 2,800 328 820 255 86
Kampot
Total 4,780 1,116 391 349 2,082 539 210 93 -
Kandal
Total 9,555 4,842 185 361 2,069 547 1,379 - 173
Koh Kong
Total 1,300 532 134 66 435 66 37 - 31
Kratie
Total 4,682 2,644 243 443 661 256 317 47 70
Mondul Kiri
Total 405 66 25 141 120 7 45 - -
Phnom Penh
Total 7,401 2,558 959 555 1,778 598 460 214 279
Preah Vihear
Total 1,695 487 70 448 456 29 152 - 52
Prey Veng
Total 13,987 4,637 720 881 3,399 1,708 1,189 646 806
Pursat
Total 3,280 784 387 547 715 347 186 207 107
Ratanak Kiri
Total 1,170 332 167 172 254 72 51 121 -
Siem Reap
Total 9,642 2,240 462 1,457 2,896 1,220 570 796 -
Disabled 2013
Cambodia/Province Mental Multiple
Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Retardatio Mental Disabilitie
n Illness Other s
(1) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16)
Preah Sihanouk
Total 4,506 3,148 - 360 838 79 80 - -
Stung Treng
Total 370 118 16 126 50 22 37 - -
Svay Rieng
Total 3,850 564 259 1,039 828 249 634 278 -
Takeo
Total 10,176 2,189 1,236 1,676 2,635 476 1,186 575 203
Otdar Meanchey
Total 3,053 1,503 138 184 992 120 81 - 36
Kep
Total 262 74 - 24 132 16 8 9 -
Pailin
Total 522 169 24 37 213 44 26 - 10
95
Annex Table 3 Percent distribution of Disabled Persons by Type of Disability, Sex : Cambodia and Province, 2013
Percent by Type of Disability in
Cambodia/Province Number Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Other Multiple
Retardation Illness Disabilities
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Cambodia Total
Total 301,629 100 34.83 5.38 9.04 33.42 5.18 7.00 3.52 1.62
Male 157,007 100 31.35 4.39 7.40 41.44 3.64 6.18 3.90 1.70
Female 144,622 100 38.61 6.46 10.81 24.73 6.84 7.89 3.11 1.55
Bantey Meanchey
Total 13,898 100 53.18 3.03 4.23 26.40 5.21 3.11 1.64 3.18
Male 7,020 100 40.10 4.10 3.74 35.18 6.34 2.64 1.59 6.30
Female 6,878 100 66.54 1.95 4.74 17.43 4.05 3.60 1.69 0.00
Battambang
Total 32,123 100 27.99 6.07 7.34 34.51 6.31 8.26 6.49 3.03
Male 16,422 100 23.21 6.02 3.78 40.71 4.42 6.62 10.43 4.82
Female 15,702 100 33.00 6.12 11.07 28.02 8.28 9.97 2.37 1.16
Kampong Cham
Total 31,720 100 33.13 4.48 10.99 35.83 5.59 8.94 1.04 0.00
96
Male 16,063 100 29.69 1.93 9.11 49.44 2.10 7.72 0.00 0.00
Female 15,656 100 36.66 7.09 12.91 21.86 9.18 10.18 2.12 0.00
Kampong Chhnang
Total 19,558 100 41.86 3.75 8.05 32.22 4.11 6.90 2.89 0.22
Male 11,647 100 31.70 2.99 8.56 38.76 6.39 8.72 2.88 0.00
Female 7,912 100 56.82 4.88 7.28 22.59 0.74 4.23 2.90 0.54
Kampong Speu
Total 12,117 100 40.46 4.41 11.57 31.78 4.98 3.80 1.70 1.30
Male 5,562 100 34.73 4.29 6.78 40.50 9.06 4.64 0.00 0.00
Female 6,555 100 45.31 4.52 15.64 24.38 1.51 3.09 3.14 2.41
Kampong Thom
Total 23,172 100 33.51 8.63 8.27 37.16 1.89 5.65 4.53 0.37
Male 11,888 100 24.30 8.10 6.99 48.88 0.92 4.12 6.68 0.00
Female 11,284 100 43.20 9.18 9.62 24.81 2.90 7.27 2.26 0.76
Kampot
Total 12,406 100 24.22 6.12 8.95 44.96 5.33 5.09 5.32 0.00
Male 7,626 100 24.76 4.84 9.98 45.84 1.61 5.53 7.44 0.00
Female 4,780 100 23.35 8.17 7.31 43.56 11.27 4.39 1.96 0.00
Kandal
Percent by Type of Disability in
Cambodia/Province Number Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Other Multiple
Retardation Illness Disabilities
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Total 17,842 100 53.55 2.25 4.80 21.65 4.05 9.81 1.95 1.94
Male 8,287 100 56.88 2.62 5.97 21.64 2.11 4.50 4.20 2.08
Female 9,555 100 50.67 1.93 3.78 21.66 5.73 14.43 0.00 1.81
Koh Kong
Total 2,575 100 39.51 6.91 4.09 40.15 3.88 2.95 1.31 1.20
Male 1,274 100 38.10 3.44 3.12 46.98 2.66 3.05 2.64 0.00
Female 1,300 100 40.89 10.31 5.04 33.46 5.07 2.85 0.00 2.38
Kratie
Total 9,310 100 46.90 3.26 10.17 27.27 3.40 4.90 2.44 1.66
Male 4,628 100 37.20 1.30 10.88 40.58 1.30 3.02 3.90 1.83
Female 4,682 100 56.48 5.19 9.47 14.12 5.48 6.77 1.00 1.50
Mondul Kiri
Total 742 100 19.44 6.87 25.60 31.87 6.65 9.57 0.00 0.00
Male 337 100 23.09 7.63 14.52 34.52 12.54 7.71 0.00 0.00
Female 405 100 16.41 6.24 34.81 29.66 1.75 11.13 0.00 0.00
Phnom Penh
97
Total 14,074 100 34.64 6.82 18.24 23.52 6.71 6.56 1.52 1.98
Male 6,673 100 34.73 0.00 30.16 22.96 5.20 6.95 0.00 0.00
Female 7,401 100 34.56 12.96 7.50 24.03 8.08 6.21 2.89 3.77
Preah Vihear
Total 3,959 100 25.11 7.53 14.19 39.15 2.31 8.41 0.00 3.30
Male 2,264 100 22.38 10.09 5.03 48.29 2.75 7.99 0.00 3.47
Female 1,695 100 28.76 4.12 26.43 26.92 1.71 8.98 0.00 3.07
Prey Veng
Total 25,301 100 34.95 5.04 5.28 28.85 7.90 9.29 3.36 5.34
Male 11,315 100 37.16 4.91 4.02 34.47 2.57 10.26 1.80 4.81
Female 13,987 100 33.16 5.15 6.30 24.30 12.21 8.50 4.62 5.76
Pursat
Total 7,031 100 20.91 7.59 12.09 36.16 6.81 5.49 9.41 1.53
Male 3,752 100 18.28 3.91 8.09 48.73 3.53 5.33 12.14 0.00
Female 3,280 100 23.91 11.79 16.67 21.79 10.57 5.69 6.30 3.28
Ratanak Kiri
Total 2,193 100 34.63 8.69 10.32 29.18 3.30 5.16 8.71 0.00
Male 1,024 100 41.73 2.30 5.32 37.68 0.00 6.10 6.87 0.00
Female 1,170 100 28.42 14.28 14.70 21.74 6.18 4.35 10.33 0.00
Percent by Type of Disability in
Cambodia/Province Number Total Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Other Multiple
Retardation Illness Disabilities
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Siem Reap
Total 22,434 100 23.71 3.82 7.66 45.08 7.80 5.54 5.58 0.82
Male 12,793 100 24.07 3.09 2.04 56.42 4.14 5.26 3.56 1.44
Female 9,642 100 23.24 4.79 15.11 30.04 12.66 5.91 8.26 0.00
Preah Sihanouk
Total 8,872 100 65.87 2.18 6.58 21.74 2.00 1.28 0.36 0.00
Male 4,366 100 61.74 4.43 5.12 24.97 2.24 0.77 0.73 0.00
Female 4,506 100 69.86 0.00 7.99 18.61 1.76 1.77 0.00 0.00
Stung Treng
Total 1,177 100 26.39 8.84 15.10 37.00 3.19 9.48 0.00 0.00
Male 807 100 23.82 10.90 6.37 47.78 1.95 9.18 0.00 0.00
Female 370 100 31.98 4.37 34.15 13.48 5.90 10.11 0.00 0.00
Svay Rieng
Total 10,854 100 23.76 6.89 14.83 28.09 7.09 11.90 5.67 1.77
Male 7,004 100 28.77 6.98 8.15 31.71 7.44 9.38 4.82 2.74
Female 3,850 100 14.64 6.72 26.99 21.50 6.46 16.47 7.22 0.00
98
Takeo
Total 19,664 100 24.33 9.81 12.99 34.96 3.90 9.04 3.94 1.03
Male 9,487 100 27.34 7.30 9.26 44.70 3.07 6.23 2.10 0.00
Female 10,176 100 21.51 12.14 16.47 25.89 4.68 11.66 5.65 1.99
Oddar Meanchey
Total 8,196 100 34.26 3.48 5.20 45.13 2.34 4.24 3.15 2.20
Male 5,143 100 25.37 2.86 4.72 52.64 1.40 5.19 5.01 2.80
Female 3,053 100 49.24 4.52 6.02 32.49 3.92 2.64 0.00 1.18
Kep
Total 685 100 24.46 1.12 9.44 50.71 5.79 3.63 3.72 1.12
Male 423 100 22.10 1.82 9.73 50.98 5.63 4.00 3.92 1.82
Female 262 100 28.27 0.00 8.97 50.27 6.04 3.04 3.41 0.00
Pailin
Total 1,725 100 27.42 6.02 2.91 52.01 4.46 4.70 0.72 1.77
Male 1,203 100 25.30 6.65 1.14 56.85 2.71 4.61 1.03 1.73
Female 522 100 32.30 4.58 7.00 40.84 8.50 4.92 0.00 1.86
Annex Table 4 Percent distribution of Disabled Persons in each Type of Disability by Sex, Broad Age group and Residence, Cambodia,
2013
Total Disabled in
Age Group Total
Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Illness Other Multiple
Retardation Disabilities
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Total Disabled
Cambodia 301,629 105,059 16,237 27,260 100,819 15,613 21,122 10,620 4,899
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 10.63 11.33 23.78 5.86 6.99 17.82 12.32 13.77 16.33
15 - 29 21.91 17.72 47.49 17.22 18.52 34.23 37.46 25.67 8.10
30 - 44 16.28 16.81 6.94 11.17 17.76 25.28 16.29 10.18 18.58
45 - 59 23.24 22.08 14.26 15.94 31.13 14.31 17.73 22.15 10.74
60+ 27.94 32.07 7.53 49.80 25.59 8.35 16.19 28.23 46.23
Males 157,008 49,216 6,898 11,621 65,059 5,717 9,710 6,124 2,663
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 10.00 13.23 27.25 5.35 4.24 22.35 14.12 12.30 19.90
15 - 29 22.18 16.90 43.61 13.40 19.42 42.80 48.22 30.18 12.28
99
30 - 44 17.92 19.14 10.67 12.29 20.14 22.32 8.22 12.80 22.08
45 - 59 26.79 23.80 8.29 21.39 36.07 8.75 14.91 26.39 9.95
60+ 23.11 26.94 10.15 47.56 20.13 3.76 14.54 18.34 35.79
Females 144,622 55,843 9,339 15,639 35,760 9,896 11,412 4,497 2,236
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 11.31 9.65 21.21 6.25 12.00 15.21 10.80 15.77 12.08
15 - 29 21.61 18.44 50.36 20.07 16.89 29.27 28.32 19.50 3.13
30 - 44 14.51 14.75 4.18 10.33 13.43 26.98 23.15 6.63 14.40
45 - 59 19.38 20.56 18.66 11.88 22.14 17.52 20.13 16.39 11.67
60+ 33.19 36.60 5.61 51.47 35.54 11.01 17.60 41.72 58.68
Urban 41,649 17,365 1,959 4,243 10,854 2,870 2,197 1,309 852
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 9.61 13.77 18.17 - 0.22 13.90 21.53 - 42.02
15 - 29 22.09 21.56 33.54 12.14 19.50 38.26 37.55 18.64 0.00
30 - 44 19.28 18.70 4.24 22.88 20.95 29.30 14.43 1.38 32.75
45 - 59 19.31 15.89 37.83 9.97 26.48 18.54 0.00 54.55 0.00
60+ 29.71 30.07 6.28 54.98 32.85 0.00 26.49 25.44 25.23
Males 21,886 8,360 506 2,815 6,303 1,460 1,379 521 542
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Total Disabled in
Age Group Total
Seeing Speech Hearing Movement Mental Mental Illness Other Multiple
Retardation Disabilities
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
0 - 14 10.73 17.63 28.85 - - 12.67 13.42 - 66.05
15 - 29 24.58 18.03 49.41 18.29 19.63 70.75 59.83 2.30 0.00
30 - 44 18.55 22.40 16.40 20.60 19.97 16.58 0.94 1.73 0.00
45 - 59 17.65 13.66 2.77 13.04 29.18 0.00 0.00 95.97 0.00
60+ 28.51 28.29 2.77 48.06 31.21 0.00 25.82 0.00 33.95
Females 19,765 9,005 1,453 1,429 4,551 1,410 819 788 310
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 8.36 10.18 14.45 - 0.53 15.18 35.16 - -
15 - 29 19.34 24.85 28.01 0.00 19.34 4.68 0.00 29.44 0.00
30 - 44 20.10 15.27 0.00 27.43 22.30 42.41 37.12 1.14 90.00
45 - 59 21.16 17.97 50.03 3.99 22.74 37.73 0.00 27.16 0.00
60+ 31.03 31.74 7.50 68.58 35.07 0.00 27.59 42.26 10.00
Rural 259,981 87,694 14,279 23,016 89,965 12,743 18,925 9,312 4,047
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 10.79 10.84 24.55 6.94 7.81 18.71 11.25 15.70 10.92
100
15 - 29 21.88 16.96 49.40 18.16 18.41 33.33 37.45 26.64 9.81
30 - 44 15.80 16.43 7.31 9.01 17.38 24.37 16.51 11.42 15.59
45 - 59 23.87 23.30 11.03 17.03 31.69 13.36 19.79 17.60 13.00
60+ 27.66 32.47 7.70 48.85 24.72 10.23 14.99 28.62 50.65
Males 135,123 40,856 6,392 8,806 58,756 4,257 8,332 5,603 2,121
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 9.88 12.32 27.13 7.06 4.70 25.65 14.23 13.44 8.16
15 - 29 21.79 16.67 43.15 11.82 19.40 33.24 46.29 32.77 15.42
30 - 44 17.82 18.47 10.22 9.63 20.16 24.29 9.42 13.83 27.72
45 - 59 28.28 25.88 8.75 24.07 36.81 11.75 17.38 19.94 12.49
60+ 22.23 26.66 10.73 47.41 18.93 5.05 12.67 20.04 36.26
Females 124,858 46,838 7,887 14,210 31,209 8,486 10,593 3,709 1,926
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
0 - 14 11.77 9.55 22.44 6.88 13.67 15.20 8.91 19.12 14.02
15 - 29 21.97 17.21 54.47 22.09 16.53 33.36 30.51 17.42 3.63
30 - 44 13.62 14.65 4.94 8.61 12.14 24.42 22.07 7.79 2.23
45 - 59 19.10 21.06 12.89 12.68 22.05 14.15 21.68 14.10 13.55
60+ 33.54 37.53 5.25 49.75 35.61 12.84 16.83 41.60 66.51
Annex Table 5 Percent Distribution of Literate Disabled Persons aged 7+ by Level of Education
and Sex; Province, 2013
Province Number Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Total None Primary not Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Completed Secondary /Technical Secondary/
Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
BOTH SEXES
Total 168,172 100 0.44 55.08 30.62 2.24 10.67 0.95
Banteay Meanchey 8,379 1.00 0.00 0.53 0.45 0.00 0.02 0.00
Battambang 20,339 100 0.00 50.55 35.25 1.27 12.92 0.00
Kampong Cham 15,908 100 2.28 64.61 27.08 2.61 3.42 0.00
Kampong Chhnang 10,108 100 0.00 59.18 35.56 0.78 4.49 0.00
Kampong Thom 6,876 100 0.00 57.70 29.99 0.00 11.05 1.27
Kampot 9,905 100 1.44 46.79 36.90 1.17 12.33 1.37
Kandal 6,837 100 1.12 49.74 27.30 8.82 10.90 2.12
Kaoh Kong 12,461 100 0.00 49.76 24.46 1.83 22.34 1.61
Kratie 1,219 100 0.00 80.49 13.84 0.00 5.67 0.00
Mondul Kiri 5,523 100 0.00 59.64 28.14 2.98 9.24 0.00
Phnom Penh 275 100 0.00 77.67 16.81 0.00 5.52 0.00
Preah Vihear 8,504 100 0.00 54.87 21.61 2.25 14.50 6.77
Prey Veng 1,892 100 0.00 64.04 19.34 0.00 16.62 0.00
Pursat 13,417 100 0.00 61.17 24.93 1.85 12.04 0.00
Ratanak Kiri 3,687 100 0.00 54.24 33.69 0.00 12.07 0.00
Siem Reap 796 100 0.00 47.95 21.77 15.23 15.05 0.00
Preah Sihanouk 13,396 100 0.68 66.12 24.24 1.85 7.12 0.00
Stung Treng 6,407 100 0.00 32.18 29.98 11.44 19.64 6.76
Svay Rieng 543 100 0.00 41.15 44.91 3.90 10.04 0.00
Takeo 5,859 100 0.00 51.69 40.53 0.98 6.80 0.00
Oddar Meanchey 9,826 100 0.00 50.25 37.94 1.31 10.50 0.00
Kep 4,588 100 1.46 56.14 29.78 2.54 10.08 0.00
Pailin 417 100 0.00 66.74 13.55 5.67 12.20 1.84
MALES
Total 104,752 100 0.48 48.36 33.98 2.72 13.11 1.34
Banteay Meanchey 4,824 100 0.00 42.87 57.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Battambang 12,842 100 0.00 45.97 39.51 0.00 14.52 0.00
Kampong Cham 10,253 100 3.54 59.37 27.74 4.05 5.30 0.00
Kampong Chhnang 6,710 100 0.00 57.10 35.90 1.17 5.83 0.00
Kampong Speu 3,217 100 0.00 53.45 32.79 0.00 11.05 2.70
Kampong Thom 6,745 100 0.00 38.78 46.25 1.71 13.25 0.00
Kampot 5,336 100 1.43 50.93 24.94 11.31 8.68 2.71
Kandal 6,835 100 0.00 27.75 25.26 3.33 40.72 2.94
Koh Kong 813 100 0.00 78.18 13.32 0.00 8.50 0.00
Kratie 3,168 100 0.00 47.80 40.60 3.80 7.81 0.00
Mondul Kiri 192 100 0.00 68.00 24.09 0.00 7.91 0.00
Phnom Penh 4,213 100 0.00 43.35 17.16 4.54 21.29 13.66
Preah Vihear 1,295 100 0.00 58.19 23.14 0.00 18.67 0.00
Prey Veng 7,944 100 0.00 49.84 26.69 3.13 20.34 0.00
Pursat 2,459 100 0.00 47.73 34.17 0.00 18.09 0.00
Ratanak Kiri 402 100 0.00 27.04 31.42 24.06 17.48 0.00
Siem Reap 7,681 100 0.00 72.99 20.33 2.05 4.63 0.00
Preah Sihanouk 3,836 100 0.00 23.91 36.31 8.75 21.36 9.67
Stung Treng 389 100 0.00 40.37 45.79 5.44 8.40 0.00
Svay Rieng 4,728 100 0.00 47.44 50.23 0.00 2.33 0.00
Takeo 6,501 100 0.00 38.23 43.92 1.98 15.87 0.00
Oddar Meanchey 3,230 100 2.08 52.77 32.43 2.35 10.37 0.00
Kep 295 100 0.00 63.69 13.56 5.51 14.63 2.61
101
Province Number Educational Level of Literate Population* (Percent)
Total None Primary not Primary Lower Secondary Beyond
Completed Secondary /Technical Secondary/
Diploma Technical
Diploma
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
Pailin 843 100 0.00 49.41 33.27 2.65 13.04 1.63
FEMALES
Total 63,420 100 0.37 66.18 25.06 1.45 6.63 0.31
Banteay Meanchey 3,554 100 0.00 67.59 28.22 0.00 4.18 0.00
Battambang 7,497 100 0.00 58.41 27.96 3.45 10.17 0.00
Kampong Cham 5,654 100 0.00 74.12 25.88 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kampong Chhnang 3,397 100 0.00 63.28 34.88 0.00 1.84 0.00
Kampong Speu 3,659 100 0.00 61.43 27.53 0.00 11.04 0.00
Kampong Thom 3,160 100 4.51 63.89 16.95 0.00 10.35 4.31
Kampot 1,501 100 0.00 45.50 35.70 0.00 18.80 0.00
Kandal 5,626 100 0.00 76.50 23.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Koh Kong 406 100 0.00 85.11 14.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
Kratie 406 100 0.00 85.11 14.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mondul Kiri 83 100 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Phnom Penh 4,291 100 0.00 66.19 25.98 0.00 7.83 0.00
Preah Vihear 597 100 0.00 76.73 11.10 0.00 12.17 0.00
Prey Veng 5,474 100 0.00 77.61 22.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pursat 1,228 100 0.00 67.27 32.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
Ratanak Kiri 394 100 0.00 69.31 11.91 6.21 12.57 0.00
Siem Reap 5,715 100 1.59 56.89 29.50 1.57 10.46 0.00
Preah Sihanouk 2,571 100 0.00 44.51 20.53 15.45 17.08 2.42
Stung Treng 154 100 0.00 43.12 42.69 0.00 14.20 0.00
Svay Rieng 1,131 100 0.00 69.44 0.00 5.06 25.50 0.00
Takeo 3,325 100 0.00 73.74 26.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Oddar Meanchey 1,358 100 0.00 64.15 23.48 2.99 9.39 0.00
Kep 122 100 0.00 74.11 13.52 6.06 6.31 0.00
Pailin 168 100 0.00 47.40 45.39 0.00 7.22 0.00
* Excludes, "Not reported" and "Other "educational levels
102
Annex Table 7 Total Disabled Persons by Literacy, Level of Education, 5-Year Group and Sex, Cambodia- Total, 2013
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate/ Other Not
Literate Illiterate Not Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate Degree Reported
Reported Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec. Holder
BOTH SEXES
Total 301,629 168,233 133,396 - 10,601 82,769 41,995 28,595 2,273 72 268 1,442 156 61 -
0-4 7,019 - 7,019 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 10,711 3,312 7,399 - 870 2,442 - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 14,327 8,812 5,515 - 230 6,945 1,638 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 20,184 14,921 5,263 - 896 5,400 5,007 3,105 513 - - - - - -
20 - 24 27,795 17,437 10,359 - 962 5,943 4,855 5,023 643 - 9 - - - -
25 - 29 18,102 10,727 7,376 - 647 3,851 3,487 1,938 45 - 188 571 - - -
30 - 34 17,164 10,336 6,829 - 243 5,502 2,082 1,912 309 - 10 278 - - -
35 - 39 14,062 9,252 4,810 - 515 3,516 3,562 1,278 - - - 380 - - -
40 - 44 17,889 11,803 6,086 - 657 6,559 2,977 1,102 302 - - 206 - - -
45 - 49 23,553 14,690 8,863 - 636 7,664 3,753 2,557 - 72 - 8 - - -
50 - 54 22,732 14,399 8,333 - 565 8,580 2,822 2,248 122 - - - - 61 -
55 - 59 23,806 14,298 9,508 - 895 6,882 3,286 2,988 125 - 61 - 61 - -
60 - 64 19,829 12,593 7,235 - 1,233 6,917 2,420 1,942 - - - - 82 - -
65 - 69 19,311 10,179 9,132 - 423 4,683 2,232 2,626 215 - - - - - -
103
70 - 74 17,425 6,407 11,018 - 694 3,409 1,187 1,116 - - - - - - -
75+ 27,720 9,069 18,651 - 1,134 4,476 2,686 760 - - - - 14 - -
Males
Total 157,007 104,813 52,194 - 3,674 47,493 28,560 21,814 1,542 - 268 1,244 156 61 -
0-4 2,897 - 2,897 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 4,686 1,678 3,007 - 425 1,253 - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 8,120 5,435 2,685 - 106 4,149 1,180 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 11,720 8,798 2,922 - 100 3,692 3,082 1,863 62 - - - - - -
20 - 24 13,110 9,015 4,095 - 171 2,941 2,174 3,250 470 - 9 - - - -
25 - 29 9,996 6,814 3,182 - 450 2,058 2,169 1,532 45 - 188 372 - - -
30 - 34 8,567 5,422 3,145 - 9 1,694 1,350 1,773 309 - 10 278 - - -
35 - 39 8,517 5,899 2,618 - - 1,680 2,711 1,128 - - - 380 - - -
40 - 44 11,052 7,970 3,082 - 456 4,339 2,063 651 256 - - 206 - - -
45 - 49 14,271 9,858 4,413 - - 4,683 2,729 2,439 - - - 8 - - -
50 - 54 12,957 9,138 3,819 - 67 5,022 2,009 1,917 61 - - - - 61 -
55 - 59 14,836 10,181 4,656 - 396 4,646 2,618 2,273 125 - 61 - 61 - -
60 - 64 9,436 7,744 1,692 - 309 4,453 1,475 1,426 - - - - 82 - -
65 - 69 8,494 6,014 2,480 - 151 2,191 1,611 1,845 215 - - - - - -
70 - 74 7,555 4,361 3,194 - 271 2,156 863 1,072 - - - - - - -
75+ 10,794 6,487 4,307 - 763 2,538 2,527 645 - - - - 14 - -
Females
Total 144,622 63,420 81,202 - 6,927 35,276 13,435 6,781 731 72 - 198 - - -
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate/ Other Not
Literate Illiterate Not Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate Degree Reported
Reported Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec. Holder
104
Annex Table 7.B Total Disabled Persons by Literacy, Level of Education, 5-Year Group and Sex, Cambodia- Urban, 2013
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population
None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate/Deg Other Not
Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate ree Holder Reported
Literate Illiterate Not
Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec.
Reported
BOTH SEXES
Total 41649 28861 12788 - 3010 11313 5386 6134 1748 - 248 866 156 - -
0-4 844 - 844 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 1590 333 1257 - 333 - - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 1567 1166 402 - - 446 720 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 3511 3038 473 - 357 1020 260 888 513 - - - - - -
20 - 24 3295 2860 435 - 63 827 452 1065 453 - - - - - -
25 - 29 2396 1912 483 - 208 629 187 554 - - 188 147 - - -
30 - 34 2500 1788 711 - - 580 - 622 309 - - 278 - - -
35 - 39 2905 1962 943 - 304 532 505 241 - - - 380 - - -
40 - 44 2625 1313 1312 - - 673 279 288 12 - - 61 - - -
45 - 49 2807 2324 484 - 464 1087 357 416 - - - - - - -
50 - 54 2282 1771 511 - 265 863 263 258 122 - - - - - -
55 - 59 2954 2115 840 - 32 887 515 433 125 - 61 - 61 - -
60 - 64 3166 2625 541 - 584 1182 562 214 - - - - 82 - -
65 - 69 3490 2234 1256 - - 801 301 916 215 - - - - - -
70 - 74 2299 1390 909 - 61 925 167 237 - - - - - - -
105
75+ 3417 2031 1386 - 339 860 818 - - - - - 14 - -
Males
Total 21886 15806 6080 - 878 5272 3702 3683 1063 - 248 804 156 - -
0-4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 1193 333 860 - 333 - - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 1155 1117 38 - - 397 720 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 2064 1717 347 - - 1009 260 386 62 - - - - - -
20 - 24 1745 1460 285 - 63 130 241 745 280 - - - - - -
25 - 29 1571 1144 428 - 208 14 187 462 - - 188 85 - - -
30 - 34 1553 1104 449 - - 35 - 483 309 - - 278 - - -
35 - 39 1224 600 624 - - 56 73 91 - - - 380 - - -
40 - 44 1282 783 499 - - 432 279 - 12 - - 61 - - -
45 - 49 1192 1178 14 - - 670 153 355 - - - - - - -
50 - 54 1054 569 485 - - 61 250 197 61 - - - - - -
55 - 59 1614 1261 353 - - 669 270 75 125 - 61 - 61 - -
60 - 64 1396 1041 356 - - 552 254 153 - - - - 82 - -
65 - 69 1649 1025 624 - - 281 31 498 215 - - - - - -
70 - 74 1208 851 357 - - 447 167 237 - - - - - - -
75+ 1985 1623 362 - 273 518 818 - - - - - 14 - -
Females
Total 19763 13056 6708 - 2132 6041 1684 2450 686 - - 62 - - -
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population
None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate/Deg Other Not
Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate ree Holder Reported
Literate Illiterate Not Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec.
Reported
106
Annex Table 7C Total Disabled Persons by Literacy, Level of Education, 5-Year Group and Sex, Cambodia- Rural, 2013
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population
None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate Other Not
Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate /Degree Reported
Literate Illiterate Not
Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec. Holder
Reported
BOTH SEXES
Total 259,980 139,372 120,608 - 7,591 71,456 36,609 22,461 525 72 20 576 - 61 -
0-4 6,175 - 6,175 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 9,121 2,979 6,141 - 537 2,442 - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 12,760 7,647 5,113 - 230 6,499 918 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 16,673 11,883 4,790 - 538 4,380 4,747 2,217 - - - - - - -
20 - 24 24,500 14,576 9,924 - 899 5,116 4,403 3,958 190 - 9 - - - -
25 - 29 15,706 8,814 6,892 - 439 3,222 3,300 1,384 45 - - 424 - - -
30 - 34 14,665 8,547 6,117 - 243 4,922 2,082 1,290 - - 10 - - - -
35 - 39 11,157 7,289 3,867 - 211 2,984 3,057 1,037 - - - - - - -
40 - 44 15,265 10,490 4,774 - 657 5,886 2,698 814 290 - - 145 - - -
45 - 49 20,746 12,366 8,379 - 173 6,577 3,397 2,140 - 72 - 8 - - -
50 - 54 20,450 12,627 7,822 - 300 7,717 2,559 1,990 - - - - - 61 -
55 - 59 20,851 12,183 8,668 - 863 5,994 2,771 2,555 - - - - - - -
60 - 64 16,663 9,969 6,694 - 649 5,735 1,857 1,727 - - - - - - -
65 - 69 15,821 7,945 7,877 - 423 3,882 1,930 1,709 - - - - - - -
70 - 74 15,126 5,017 10,109 - 633 2,485 1,020 879 - - - - - - -
75+ 24,302 7,038 17,264 - 795 3,615 1,868 760 - - - - - - -
107
Males -
Total 135,122 89,007 46,114 - 2,796 42,221 24,859 18,131 480 - 20 440 - 61 -
0-4 2,897 - 2,897 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 3,493 1,345 2,148 - 92 1,253 - - - - - - - - -
10 - 14 6,964 4,318 2,646 - 106 3,752 460 - - - - - - - -
15 - 19 9,656 7,081 2,575 - 100 2,683 2,822 1,476 - - - - - - -
20 - 24 11,365 7,556 3,810 - 108 2,811 1,932 2,505 190 - 9 - - - -
25 - 29 8,425 5,671 2,754 - 242 2,044 1,982 1,070 45 - - 288 - - -
30 - 34 7,013 4,318 2,695 - 9 1,659 1,350 1,290 - - 10 - - - -
35 - 39 7,293 5,299 1,995 - - 1,623 2,638 1,037 - - - - - - -
40 - 44 9,770 7,187 2,583 - 456 3,907 1,784 651 245 - - 145 - - -
45 - 49 13,079 8,680 4,399 - - 4,013 2,576 2,083 - - - 8 - - -
50 - 54 11,903 8,569 3,334 - 67 4,960 1,760 1,721 - - - - - 61 -
55 - 59 13,222 8,919 4,303 - 396 3,977 2,348 2,199 - - - - - - -
60 - 64 8,040 6,703 1,337 - 309 3,901 1,221 1,273 - - - - - - -
65 - 69 6,845 4,988 1,856 - 151 1,910 1,581 1,347 - - - - - - -
70 - 74 6,347 3,510 2,837 - 271 1,709 696 834 - - - - - - -
75+ 8,808 4,864 3,945 - 490 2,020 1,709 645 - - - - - - -
Females
Total 124,859 50,365 74,494 - 4,795 29,235 11,751 4,331 45 72 - 136 - - -
0-4 3,277 - 3,277 - - - - - - - - - - - -
5-9 5,628 1,634 3,994 - 445 1,189 - - - - - - - - -
Age Total Literacy Educational Level of Literates
Group Population
None Primary Primary Lower Secondary Technical Technical Under- Graduate Other Not
Not Secondary School/ Diploma Diploma Graduate /Degree Reported
Literate Illiterate Not
Completed Baccalaur. Pre-Sec. Post-Sec. Holder
Reported
108