ASHRAE 2024 Level One HVAC

Design Competition
Boise State University
Team Members: Andrew May, Cody McMahan, Aaron Larison, Cody Smith
Advisors: Bryant Johnson, P.E., Connor Davis, P.E., Aaron Smith, PhD

1
Table of Contents

Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
Problem Statement........................................................................................................................... 4
Literature Review.............................................................................................................................5
Methodology.................................................................................................................................... 6
Calculations......................................................................................................................................7
Equipment...................................................................................................................................... 10
Analysis and Results...................................................................................................................... 17
Discussion...................................................................................................................................... 19
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................... 22
References......................................................................................................................................23
Appendices..................................................................................................................................... 24

2
Introduction
This report is the Boise State ASHRAE team submission for ASHRAE's HVAC design calculations
project. The purpose of this project is to provide correctly sized heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
for the new public library located in São Paulo, Brazil. The primary goal is to create a safe, sustainable,
and efficient HVAC system that prioritizes energy efficiency, occupant well-being, and long-term
sustainability. The main stakeholders in this project are the library patrons and the maintenance team. The
patron's comfort will be based on maintaining the proper temperature and multi-zone control for the
different areas. Discomfort concerns may arise if the spaces are not temperature-regulated, or pressurized
properly, or if ducts are sized incorrectly. To maintain a long-life system the maintenance team will need
accessible equipment panels, well-designed control systems, and good service support. If equipment
needs training or is outdated they may face challenges down the road. The choice between a water or
air-cooling chiller system will depend on factors such as efficiency, cost, water conservation, and
maintenance complexity. The VAV system has been requested by the owner as it is a very energy-efficient
system for the large building type. Air handling units and the amount of them will be selected based on
zoning capability and indoor air quality.
The HVAC system will meet the various needs, including supporting occupant health and safety,
providing comfort functions like humidity control and temperature regulation, and complying with local
codes and ASHRAE standards. Access and maintenance areas are easily accessible, and reports for
cooling and heating block load calculations will be shown. The system will also adhere to the owner's
budget of ten million dollars (USD), system design will be completed by May 4th, 2024, and use a VAV
system for the building. Specifications include using MERV rating 10 or higher air filtration systems,
maintaining duct noise levels below 45 decibels, complying with seasonal humidity requirements,
referencing six ASHRAE standards, and ensuring that selected equipment complies with ASHRAE
standards 90.1 and 189.1. Access areas for installation and maintenance are specified, as are documented
reports for heating and cooling calculations, budget constraints, and the use of one VAV terminal for each
zone.
The project is based in São Paulo, Brazil, with a humid subtropical climate. The design will consider
climate, population density, and indoor air quality. Design challenges involve local climate and
environmental factors, building characteristics, layout, equipment selection and sizing, and equipment
selection. Detailed calculations are required for heating and cooling loads, outside air, and ventilation
requirements. The project adheres to ASHRAE standards and regulations to ensure safety, energy
efficiency, and sustainability.
Designing the HVAC system for the São Paulo public library is a complex task with various
stakeholders and critical considerations. It necessitates careful equipment selection, adherence to
standards, and a focus on occupant well-being and environmental sustainability. Meeting the specified
needs and specifications while considering local climate conditions is crucial for the successful design.

3
Problem Statement
The primary goal of the 2024 American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) Level One Design Competition is to conduct heating, ventilation, and air
conditioning (HVAC) design calculations, focusing on achieving an accurately sized HVAC system for a
newly constructed public library situated in São Paulo, Brazil. The chosen system must use a variable air
volume (VAV) system, and an air handling unit (AHU). The library's owner has entrusted our team with
designing the safest and most sustainable HVAC system possible. This approach prioritizes energy
efficiency, occupant well-being, and ease of maintenance while creating distinct temperature and humidity
zones within a three-story library to provide an exceptional indoor environment year-round. The building
owner has a mechanical budget of ten million dollars (USD) and will have an expected minimum service
life of 50 years.

4
Literature Review
The standards listed below are all required for this project and will be followed in every aspect. The
standards are from ASHRAE and are specifically named for this design. ASHRAE standards are widely
known and respected in professional and government regulatory bodies. These standards can be found on
their website: Read-Only Versions of ASHRAE Standards.

ASHRAE STANDARD 15-2019 - Safety Standard for Refrigeration Systems

This standard primarily focuses on specifying safety requirements for refrigeration systems to prevent
accidents and ensure the safety of people working with or near these systems. The standard covers the
design, construction, installation, and operation of refrigeration systems. It addresses safety concerns
related to both the system itself and the refrigerants used.
ASHRAE STANDARD 34-2019 - Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants
This standard provides a thorough framework for designating and classifying refrigerants based on their
properties and safety characteristics. It defines a system for assigning unique identifiers to refrigerants,
including letter codes and numbers. This designation system helps identify and communicate the
characteristics of different refrigerants effectively.
ASHRAE STANDARD 55-2017 - Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
Standard 55 provides guidelines and recommendations for creating comfortable indoor environments in
terms of temperature, humidity, air speed, and radiant heat. It considers factors like different activities and
clothing levels, uses models like PMV/PPD, and offers methods to assess compliance. The standard
categorizes occupancy into four groups and addresses local thermal discomfort.
ASHRAE STANDARD 62.1-2019 - Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality
62.1 focuses on establishing ventilation requirements to ensure acceptable indoor air quality (IAQ) in
various types of buildings. This standard provides minimum ventilation rates and other requirements for
commercial and institutional buildings. It addresses ventilation system design, operation, and maintenance
to achieve acceptable indoor air quality.
ASHRAE STANDARD 90.1-2019 - Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential
Buildings
90.1 provides guidelines and requirements for energy-efficient design and construction of commercial and
high-rise residential buildings to improve their energy performance and reduce environmental impacts. It
sets specific energy performance targets and requirements for building components and systems,
including lighting, HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning), building envelope, and more. It
aims to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.
ASHRAE STANDARD 189.1-2017 - Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings
This standard focuses on providing guidelines and requirements for the design, construction, and
operation of high-performance and sustainable green buildings. The standard covers a wide range of
sustainability aspects for buildings, including energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor environmental
quality, site sustainability, and materials and resources.

5
Methodology
To accurately provide an HVAC system for the building the first thing that must be done is background
research. By conducting comprehensive background research on the problem, context and relative factors
related to HVAC system design will be understood. This included information about the building
specifications, climate conditions of São Paulo, energy in the region, standards of comfort, and HVAC
equipment and terminology.

The analysis of the building's layout and occupancy patterns will be used to determine the placement of
different zones in the building. Zoning divides the building into spaces that are controlled by their
thermostat. Factors that decide the placement will be occupancy density, temperature preference, and
equipment heat gains. Trane TRACE 3D Plus was used for the zone selection. Once each zone is made,
TRACE allows for zone types to be assigned to specific zones. Each zone will be placed in the zone type
based on the owner requirements table of space types and their specified temperature and relative
humidity requirements.
Preliminary hand calculations were performed to determine the heating and cooling load and ventilation
for one of the zones. By using the fundamental engineering principles and equations from the ASHRAE
handbook these calculations were to serve as a verification of the software calculations. By inputting
building parameters, occupancy schedule, and equipment selections (VAVs) the software generated
accurate cooling and heating loads to compare. With the preliminary hand calculations matching the
software, it was safe to assume that the software could be used on the rest of the building with assured
accuracy.
A detailed ductwork layout will be completed based on the zoning, air flow calculations, and architecture
of the building. When designing the factors of structural obstructions, accessibility for maintenance, and
space limitations will be considered. AutoCAD will be used to create the 2D drawings of the duct system.
By selecting the correct sizing of the ductwork, it will minimize pressure losses, and reduce energy
consumption and noise levels.
Equipment selections will then be done based on the heating and cooling requirements of the building.
For the selection of grilles, registers, diffusers, and VAV terminals Titus TEAMS was used. For larger
equipment like AHUs, a vendor will be contacted to help determine the specific AHU selection.
The software that was used first was Trane TRACE 3D Plus. Based on the TRACE 700 platform, TRACE
3D Plus is the most current version of the design and analysis software tool. It allows for comprehensive
energy modeling & economic analysis to optimize their designs through running simulations. The use of
this software for this project was for zoning, load calculations, CFM needs, and energy analysis.
AutoCAD from Autodesk has been a tool used by engineers since its development. The 2D and 3D
computer-aided design software allows for drafting to be done with a high degree of precision. In this
project, AutoCAD was used to design the ductwork that runs throughout the building. The ductwork is a
single line and includes all necessary components including diffusers, return grills, VAV placement,
supply and return trunks, thermostats, and more. The ductwork was sized using a ductulator and made
note on the AutoCAD drawings. A ductulator allows for accurate sizing of the duct by taking the CFM
demands, static loss, and air velocity. The ductulator will then tell the needed round duct diameter or the
rectangular duct dimensions in inches for those parameters.
Titus VAV selections were made utilizing software produced by Titus called Titus Teams. The team
elected to use the DESV model from Titus utilizing digital direct controls. The engineer is able to create a

6
project within the program and add the equipment they are scheduling based on the requirements for the
space. For this instance of VAV terminal selections the inputs were the CFM for the supply of the zone,
the leaving air temperature of the box, and the electrical information being utilized, for this the team
specified 208-volt single-phase electrical connections for the heating coil. With those inputs, the software
is able to give a report of what terminal units would be most compatible with the information provided.
The information the engineers are looking for is the inlet diameter, the model number, and the electrical
information which would be provided to the electrical engineer to provide power to the boxes.
Lastly, an assumption that was made during the design process was that the building allowed for a plenum
return. The term "plenum" typically denotes a space that's part of the building's air handling system where
air circulates for HVAC purposes. Therefore a plenum return in a building refers to a type of ventilation
system where the return air ductwork is located within the building's structural space. This assumption
will reduce the cost and time of installation as there will not be return ductwork running from each return
grill. It is safe to assume that a plenum return can be used as the building is made from steel and not a
flammable material, and it is common for commercial buildings to implement this design choice.

Calculations
Ventilation in an HVAC system entails swapping indoor air with outdoor air to improve indoor air quality,
a crucial aspect of maintaining a healthy and comfortable environment within a building. This function
serves various purposes, including providing fresh air, managing moisture and temperature levels, and
eliminating contaminants. These ventilation guidelines adhere to the ASHRAE standard 62.1, which
recommends 5 people per 1000 square feet.
ASHRAE Standard 62.1 establishes ventilation requirements to maintain acceptable indoor air quality
(IAQ) in different building types, offering minimum rates for commercial and institutional buildings. It
covers ventilation system design, operation, and maintenance to achieve satisfactory IAQ.
The governing equation utilized for ventilation air is Vbz = Rp * Pz + Ra * Az, as sourced from the
literature. This equation considers the outdoor air rate per person, the outdoor air rate per area, and the
density of occupants.
In ventilation assumptions, a ratio of 5 people per 1000 square feet was considered, totaling 58
individuals in the space under examination. The occupancy density specific to the library is measured at
0.12 cubic feet per minute per square foot (cfm/sq ft). These figures are crucial components in
calculations, particularly concerning cooling requirements and ensuring optimal air circulation within the
library environment. Taking account of these factors, the aim is to maintain a comfortable and healthy
atmosphere for occupants while effectively managing indoor air quality and temperature levels.
Each level necessitates a specific airflow volume to ensure effective ventilation. Beginning with the
basement, which serves as the building's lowest space, is equipped with a ventilation capacity of 1,010
cubic feet per minute (CFM). Other floors witness an increase in airflow to accommodate larger
occupancy and spatial demands. The first floor has a ventilation rate of 2,113 CFM, marking a significant
increase compared to the basement level. The mezzanine's airflow capacity increased to 2,645 CFM to
ensure proper ventilation for this intermediate level. Moving to the second floor, the ventilation system
must deliver 3,235 CFM to meet the highest demand indicating more occupants. Finally, the third floor
sustains ventilation at 1,504 CFM, ensuring adequate airflow even at the building's highest level.
Calibrating ventilation rates for each floor ensures a consistently comfortable and healthy indoor

7
environment for occupants. Space Temperature and Space humidity requirements are defined below, if a
space is not listed a general assumption of the space conditions should be made by the design team:
Trane Trace 3D was utilized to assess each level of the library, determining the specific cooling and
heating load, as well as ventilation requirements based on space type, humidity, and dry bulb temperature.
The creation of spaces and zones aligned with the owner's specifications, utilizing defined humidity
percentages and dry bulb parameters. This approach enabled Trane to comprehensively understand the
cooling, heating, and ventilation needs.
The temperature design conditions for the exterior and zones of the building are outlined as follows. In
the summer the exterior temperature averages 82.7°F, with the designated zone temperature set at 75°F,
resulting in a temperature difference (ΔT) of 13.1°F. In the winter months, the exterior temperature is an
average of 48.4°F, while the zone temperature remains at 72°F, the ΔT of 23.6°F. These design conditions
provide the needed parameters for the building's HVAC system to maintain comfortable indoor
temperatures year-round, and account for seasonal temperature changes.
These equations form the foundation for understanding and quantifying heat transfer processes in various
systems, including buildings and HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems. The first
equation 𝑄=𝐴×𝑈×ΔT, known as Newton's Law of Cooling, expresses the heat transfer Q between two
surfaces in terms of their surface area A, the overall heat transfer coefficient U and the temperature
difference ΔT. This equation is fundamental for analyzing heat exchange in thermal systems. The
subsequent equations capture different aspects of heat transfer: Qsens + Qlat = Qtotal. represent sensible heat,
latent heat, and total heat transfer, respectively, in HVAC applications. These equations involve factors
such as airflow CFM, temperature difference, humidity ratio, and enthalpy difference. Qheat, total account for
heat transfer from both exterior and interior sources, including walls, windows, roofs, lighting, equipment,
and occupants, offering a comprehensive understanding of building heat dynamics. Finally, the equation
R=1/U relates to the overall heat transfer coefficient U, crucial for assessing the insulating properties of
materials and structures. Together, these governing equations play a pivotal role in designing
energy-efficient systems and optimizing thermal comfort in various environments. ​

To find the heating and cooling demand for the spaces, the building fenestration and materials need to be
defined. The fenestrations refer to the design of doors, windows, etc. These physical building properties
are crucial for heat and cooling loads because they determine the quantity of interior-to-exterior heat
transfer. The quality of fenestration will allow for the change in building energy efficiency and use.
The heating assumptions for the building evaluation encompass several key parameters. Firstly, it is
assumed that there is no infiltration, with the space maintaining a positively charged condition where the
supply air exceeds the exhaust air. The interior walls and floors are considered to be adiabatic, meaning
no transfer of heat with the surroundings. The building features vertical curtain storefront-style windows,
each measuring 2 feet by 12 feet, with the total window area calculated by the summing of all window
dimensions. This evaluation is conducted under peak load conditions, specifically on the coldest day of
the year in winter, ensuring a thorough assessment of the heating requirements and performance of the
building envelope.
The cooling assumptions for the building evaluation encompass several key factors to ensure a
comprehensive assessment of the cooling requirements and performance of the building envelope. It is
assumed that there is no infiltration, with the space maintaining a positively charged condition where the
supply air exceeds the exhaust air. Additionally, the interior walls and floors are considered adiabatic,
meaning they do not transfer heat with the surroundings. The building features vertical curtain
storefront-style windows, each measuring 2 feet by 12 feet, with the total window area obtained by

8
summing all window dimensions. The evaluation is conducted under peak load conditions, specifically on
the warmest day of the year in summer, ensuring a thorough assessment of the cooling needs and
efficiency of the building's design.
The provided data details the materials used in building construction, along with their respective
thickness, thermal conductivity (K), and thermal resistance (R) values. Outside air, subjected to a 15 mph
wind, has a thermal resistance of 0.17 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. Among the materials listed, the fiber-reinforced
plaster system with a density of 70 lb/ft^3 has a thickness of 2.75 inches, providing a thermal resistance of
1.0456 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. Mineral wool blanket insulation, ranging from 1 to 3 lbs/ft^3, at 1-inch thickness,
offers a thermal resistance of 3.5714 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. Gypsum sheathing, with a density of 70 lbs/ft^3 and a
thickness of 0.75 inches, provides a thermal resistance of 0.2852 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. Fiberglass batt insulation,
with a density ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 lb/ft^3 and a thickness of 6 inches, yields a thermal resistance of
18.1818 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. Gypsum wallboard, 0.5 inches thick, offers a thermal resistance of 0.4545
h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. The inside air contributes a thermal resistance of 0.68 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. The total thermal
resistance (R-value) of the building materials sums up to 24.3885 h⋅ft2⋅F/Btu. The overall U-value,
representing the rate of heat loss through the building envelope, is calculated to be 0.041 Btu/h⋅ft2⋅F.
A heating and cooling load percentage difference was calculated. In the analytical method, the cooling
load is estimated at 88,037 Btu/h, while the heating load stands at 12,089 Btu/h. Trane Trace 3D predicted
a small variance in values, with a cooling load of 88,800 Btu/h and a heating load of 11,900 Btu/h. The
percentage differences between the two methods are minimal, with a 0.9% difference for the cooling load
and 1.6% for the heating load. This suggests a close alignment between the analytical and Trane Trace 3D
calculations for both cooling and heating requirements, highlighting the reliability of the assessments.
Zoning involves dividing the building into multiple zones, with each zone equipped with its own
thermostat and variable air volume (VAV) reheat dampers to regulate airflow. This approach offers precise
control over heating and cooling in areas with varying load conditions. The independence provided by
zoning ensures occupants' comfort and safety. Additionally, zoning supports the longevity and efficiency
of equipment in equipment rooms. Also, this saves energy by only conditioning the spaces in use,
lowering costs, and being more eco-friendly. Furthermore, in the library setting, zoning helps meet
preservation standards for books and documents by keeping stable temperature and humidity levels in
book storage areas, protecting the collection.

Figure 1: Trane Trace Zoning - Basement, First Floor, and Mezzanine

9
 Figure 2: Trane Trace Zoning Second Floor, and Third Floor
The following outlines the temperature and humidity requirements for each space. Spaces that are not
listed are calculated by making general assumptions regarding their conditions. Different spaces within
the building have varying temperature and humidity requirements based on function and seasons. Offices,
conference rooms, retail spaces, and the café maintain a maximum of 75°F with 50% humidity in
summer, dropping to a minimum of 72°F in winter. Libraries must maintain a constant 75°F with 50%
humidity in both seasons. Special collections aim for 75°F with 35-45% humidity in summer and 60°F
with 30% humidity in winter. Storage rooms maintain 72°F with 50% humidity in summer and a
minimum of 68°F in winter. Equipment rooms stay at 80°F in summer and 65°F in winter, while electrical
closets have a minimum of 65°F in winter. These requirements ensure optimal conditions throughout the
building.

Equipment
To finalize the equipment selection, various analyses, designs, and calculations are necessary. This
includes load assessments, design of air duct layouts, determination of airflow volumes, calculation of
friction losses, and planning of the duct sizing and layout.

Building Level Ventilation (CFM) Supply Air (CFM)

Basement 1,010 5,214

First Floor 2,113 11,179

Mezzanine 2,645 14,880

Second Floor 3,235 23,270

Third Floor 1,504 12,709

Figure 3: Floor and Correlating Ventilation and Supply Air Flow Rate
A Ductilator is a tool used in HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning) systems for measuring
or regulating airflow within the ductwork. It uses the values of velocity, static pressure, and volume of air
(cfm) flowing through the ducts. This enables the determination of duct sizing and the selection of duct
geometries, whether circular or rectangular. Following industry standards for pressure loss (0.08-1.0
inches of water gauge, InWg) and a maximum air velocity of 800 feet per minute (FPM), the ducts were
sized accordingly.

10
The ducting friction loss is the resistance encountered by air as it flows through the ductwork due to
friction between the air and the inner surface of the duct walls. Friction loss increases with the length of
the duct, the roughness of the duct material, and the velocity of the air. It is measured by inches of water
gauge (inWG) per unit length of duct. Friction loss must be accounted for in the HVAC system design to
ensure that the airflow reaches its intended destination at the required velocity and volume.
Static pressure is caused by the air pressure within the ductwork in all directions. It represents the
potential energy and is measured in inWG, as well. Static pressure is crucial for ensuring that air is
distributed evenly throughout the HVAC system and reaches all zones. Maintaining the standard pressure
of 0.08 inWG is critical. A variance in this value indicates potential issues like blockages, restrictions, or
other ductwork problems that can hinder airflow and will decrease system efficiency.
The choice of duct material considered various factors such as type, quality, availability, and market
conditions. Trunks, branches, and sub-branches or laterals of the ducting system are constructed from
sheet metal, which is galvanized steel or aluminum. Rectangular trunks and branches are used to save
space and minimize friction loss within the ducting system, while circular laterals and connections to the
supply air diffusers ensure efficient airflow distribution. Sheet metal was chosen primarily for its
cost-effectiveness, airtightness, ability to be customized, compatibility, and structural integrity. It
effectively handles high air pressure demands and resists rusting, ensuring durability and dependable
performance. To ensure proper air distribution and accommodate the location of supply diffusers, flexible
ductwork was used. The flexible duct material consists of a wire coil encased in flexible plastic.

Figure 4: Second Floor and Automatic Retrieval System Duct Layout and Sizing
The second floor of the library spans 44,095 square feet and is serviced by 169 supply grilles, 17 exhaust
grilles with 3 pumps, and 62 return grilles to facilitate efficient air circulation. The ducting system ranges
from 6” diameter to 54”x40” trunk, which transitions to square ducting beyond 22” diameter. With 30
variable air volume (VAV) units, the total supply chase CFM is 24,290. AHU 3 manages 23,270 CFM
airflow, cooling capacity of 35.255 tons, and heating capacity of 63,906 Btuh/hr. AHU 5, dedicated to the

11
Automated Storage and Retrieval System, maintains 1,020 CFM airflow, 1.75 tons of cooling, and 1,227
Btuh heating capacity, which ensures precise environmental control.
VAV reheat boxes were scheduled for each floor based on the CFM requirements for every zone contained
within the floors. This is shown in one of the schedules provided below.

Figure 5: Mechanical VAV Schedule for 3rd floor

What is being covered in this schedule begins with the callout that will be shown on the plans so that the
installer is able to quickly reference this schedule. Then the inlet and flow rate for the selected unit, when
choosing the inlet size for these terminal units the main area of concern is the electrical heating
component, being able to maintain pressure and volumetric flow rate across the unit, and the noise
criterion to ensure that the box is not making too much noise for the space it will be serving.
AHU DX Units were selected by taking the information gathered from heating and cooling load
calculations and sending it to an equipment supplier. The team had proposed the use of 5 AHU’s and we
received quotes and specifications for units that would be able to meet these qualifications in the schedule
provided below.

Figure 6: AHU Schedule for Project

The schedule shown depicts the characteristics that compose each of the 5 AHU types that are being
proposed for this project. Each AHU will have a supply fan, a return fan, a cooling coil (no heating coil as

12
we are utilizing vav reheat) and filtration. Each of these sections have individual characteristics which are
necessary to ensure the load requirements are being met. For the supply fan wall the first portion is the
static pressure in inches water gauge for the external pressure and the total pressure for the wall. Then the
fan component consists of a fan type which in this case is a circular fan wall that is motorized, the type is
given, the diameter of the fan as well as the revolutions per minute which the fan will be operating at. The
brake horsepower of the fan is derived from the fan efficiency curve when the vendor is selecting the
equipment. After this information the motor is selected with the most appropriate voltage and phase to
accommodate. The return fan wall follows this same fashion but with slight variations relevant to the
pressure and fan blade size. The cooling coil for these DX models shows the wet and dry bulb
temperatures of the air before and after passing through the coils, followed by the total sensible loads the
coils are equipped to handle. Finally the last portion of the schedule is the filter wall, some of the units
selected have a pre filter as well as a final filter. They are also composed of multiple smaller filters with
respective pressure drops associated with them as well as a maximum air velocity that the filter can
withstand then the efficiencies for the filters selected ranges from MERV 8 to MERV 14.
An isometric view of the AHU-2 selection for the first floor and mezzanine has been included in the
appendix to display these different components.
Diffuser selection is referenced in the appendix below, our team selected 4 diffuser types to be utilized for
the most efficient air distribution within the floor plan. For this project the diffuser selected was the Titus
model MCD with an aluminum finish and a 24x24 inch grille. The different diffuser types were based on
the nominal diameter of the neck size depending on the CFM required for that diffuser. CFM for zones
was split up evenly to provide proper air distribution and limit the amount of diffusers needed. Neck size
on a diffuser in correlation with the CFM it is pushing is an important factor because it determines the
noise criterion associated with that diffuser as well as the throw distance that can be expected of that
diffuser.
The return and exhaust grilles are also shown below in the appendix scheduled as 24x24 grilles. These
grilles are generic steel blade return grilles which will lead to the plenum.
Exhaust fan schedules are shown in the appendix and for the project the team proposed to use centrifugal
upward blasting fans sized at 1/10 horsepower in order to accommodate the exhaust loads from the
different floors ranging from 200-600 CFM for the varying bathrooms.

Figure 7: Block diagram for selected HVAC process and components

13
 Figure 8: Schematic AHU with a Direct Expansion Integration
For the library, the HVAC system features five AHU (Air Handling Unit) DX units. These AHUs each are
equipped with MERV 8 filters and DX cooling coils. These units are essential for maintaining indoor air
quality and temperature control throughout the building. The MERV 8 filters efficiently capture airborne
particles, ensuring clean and healthy air circulation within the premises. The DX cooling coils play a
crucial role in cooling the air before it is distributed into the occupied spaces. To facilitate airflow, it will
utilize a fan supply wall, optimizing the efficiency of the ventilation system. This comprehensive setup
not only ensures comfortable and healthy indoor environments but also contributes to energy efficiency
and operational effectiveness within the building.
AHU exhaust air consists of contaminants, odors, or heat emitted from a building, aimed at preserving air
quality and managing humidity levels. Outdoor air intake involves bringing fresh air into the ventilation
system to dilute indoor pollutants, regulate humidity, and prevent stagnant air, all of which is filtered
before distribution. Return air, is the air drawn back into the HVAC system after circulating throughout
the building, potentially containing indoor pollutants and dust. It undergoes filtration and conditioning
before being recirculated to uphold both temperature and air quality standards.

Basement Floor 9 VAV Reheats 1 AHU: CFM Rating ()

First and Mezzanine Floor 36 VAV Reheats 2 AHU: CFM Rating ()

Second Floor and A.R.S 30 VAV Reheats 2 AHU: CFM Rating ()

Third Floor 24 VAV Reheats 1 AHU: CFM Rating ()

Figure 9: Schematic AHU with a Direct Expansion Integration

14
 Figure 10: Direct Expansion Unit Process Diagram
The DX unit, integrated with the AHU, operates as a refrigeration system to directly cool the passing air.
Specifically, the Nortek AHU DX unit utilizes R410 refrigerant. Within the DX unit, a closed-loop
refrigeration cycle encompasses a compressor, condenser, expansion valve, and evaporator. As the
refrigerant circulates through this cycle, the DX coil within the AHU absorbs heat from the passing air,
resulting in cooled air. This cooled air is then distributed throughout the building via ductwork as supply
air. Known for their efficiency and simplicity, DX units offer effective direct cooling solutions.

Figure 11: Variable Air Volume Unit with Electric Reheat Coil
A VAV reheat unit was used in the HVAC system for the library building, which allowed for precise
temperature control and efficiency. The airflow for each zone is controlled by dampers. The reheat coils,
which were electrically heated, are used in the zones to reach temperatures specified by the zoning
temperature requirements. Thermostats monitor room temperature and adjust VAV reheat and dampers as
required based on heating or cooling needs. VAV Energy-saving features include optimizing setpoints,
scheduling setbacks, and using occupancy sensors.

Basement Floor 9 VAV Reheats

First and Mezzanine Floor 36 VAV Reheats

15
 Second Floor 29 VAV Reheats

Third Floor 24 VAV Reheats

Figure 12: Building Levels with Respective Quantity of VAV Reheats

Figure 13: Mini-Split Units with Outdoor/Indoor Units

The ¾-ton, MLB009S4S Mini-split HVAC units, also known as ductless systems, are compact heating
and cooling systems that provide climate control to individual spaces or zones. Mini-split systems
consist of two main components: an outdoor compressor/condenser unit and one or more indoor
air-handling units. These units are connected by refrigerant lines and electrical wiring, allowing for
flexible installation options. Each indoor unit is controlled independently, allowing users to adjust the
temperature and settings for each zone separately. Mini-split systems offer advantages such as energy
efficiency, quiet operation, and zoning capabilities, making them ideal for retrofitting older buildings,
room additions, or areas where ductwork installation is impractical. Additionally, they provide both
heating and cooling functions, making them versatile solutions for year-round comfort.
Our library building is equipped with specialized rooms such as telecommunication and mechanical
rooms that require precise temperature control due to the excessive heat generated by machinery within
these spaces. To effectively manage this excessive thermal load, HVAC mini-split systems have been
installed, to reduce load on the primary AHU and reduce VAV reheat quantities. These systems provide
efficient heating and cooling solutions that correlate to the needs of each area. With a total of ten Lennox
units distributed throughout the building, each unit serving a designated area, the building benefits from
individualized climate control. These units, priced at approximately $5000 each, come complete with
installed thermostats for local temperature regulation and a centralized controller for convenient
management of the entire HVAC system. This setup ensures optimal comfort and operational efficiency
throughout the library spaces.

Figure 14: Respectfully, Grille for Return and Exhaust, Diffuser for Supply, and Fan for Exhaust.

16
 The 24" x 24" supply air diffuser, model Core Diffuser with an aluminum finish by Titus, integrates
efficiently with systems, offering high efficiency. The diffuser maintains a consistent horizontal flow
pattern, transitioning smoothly from maximum to minimum CFM, ensuring uniform air distribution of
airflow rate. These diffusers work well with the VAV system functionality. The Titus 350RL Steel Return
Grille, sized at 24x24 inches, has a 3/4-inch blade spacing and a 35-degree deflection angle, it has
efficient air circulation. This grille is composed of steel material, so it will be durable and have longevity
in a library space. The exhaust fans operate at 115V / 1Ph with a 60Hz frequency. With a CFM range
spanning 411 to 1468, they accommodate a large parameter of airflow needs. It is equipped with a 1/4
HP direct-drive motor and a 19" x 19" base that includes mounting holes for easy attachment to a ceiling.
Equipped with a Vari-Green motor, its speed is controllable. The roof or wall mountable design offers
installation options to meet different ventilation requirements.

Figure 15: Honeywell Alerton’s BACnet Thermostat

Alerton's VisualLogic Display (VLD) is a smart sensor-controller designed for the libraries AHU. It
comes with built-in temperature and humidity sensors, offering a cost-effective solution for spaces in
public areas. The VLDs interface is a clear digital display. It also supports wireless door and occupancy
sensors for added functionality. With direct digital control (DDC), it allows for control over units,
customizable displays, and an enhanced user experience through pre-configured applications.
Analysis and Results

Levels Cooling Load (Btu/h) Heating Load (Btu/h) Ventilation (CFM)

Basement 126,624 7,854 1,010

First Floor 210,537 19,708 2,113

Mezzanine 285,006 38,914 2,645

Second Floor 443,479 65,133 3,235

Third Floor 318,933 44,624 1,504

TOTAL 2,219,934 Btu/h or 184 tons 161,880 10,605

Figure 16: Library Building Load Calculations

The Library Building Load Calculations reveal the cooling and heating demands across different levels. In
the basement, the cooling load stands at 126,624 Btu/h, while the heating load is 7,854 Btu/h. On the first
floor, the cooling load increases to 210,537 Btu/h, with a heating load of 19,708 Btu/h. Moving up to the
mezzanine, the cooling load further rises to 285,006 Btu/h, accompanied by a heating load of 38,914
Btu/h. The second floor demonstrates the highest cooling and heating demands, reaching 443,479 Btu/h

17
and 65,133 Btu/h, respectively. The third floor requires cooling of 318,933 Btu/h and heating of 44,624
Btu/h. In total, the building's cooling load sums up to 2,219,934 Btu/h or 184 tons, with a heating load of
161,880 Btu/h. These calculations are essential for designing an HVAC system that efficiently meets the
temperature control needs of each floor within the library building.
The automatic retrieval system of 2,574 ft2 for books had a required airflow of 1,020 CFM, the system
effectively circulates air to ensure a comfortable environment for both visitors and materials. Considering
the cooling sensible load of 20417 BTU/h and the heating sensible load of 1227 BTU/h, the system is
adept at maintaining a stable temperature conducive to preserving the integrity of the books. With no
latent load to contend with, the focus lies on effectively managing the sensible loads. Powered by two
50-horsepower motors, the system demonstrates robustness and reliability in its operations, ensuring
seamless retrieval and storage processes while upholding optimal environmental conditions within the
library space.
The above details an extensive analysis conducted on a multi-level building using Trane Trace 3D, with a
focus on its heating and cooling systems. The analysis was on all five levels of the building, aiming to
collect data on various climate control parameters within each zone on every floor and to find the
building's overall load values. By individually calculating heating and cooling loads for each zone, the
analysis provides an assessment of the thermal requirements for each specific area within the building.
The basement, characterized by a smaller footprint and no exposure to roofs and windows, exhibits lower
heating and cooling needs due to reduced external influences. The second floor presented unique
challenges with its large volume of space and numerous multi-level areas requiring conditioning, resulting
in higher heating and cooling load requirements. The increased area layout and conditioning demands on
the second floor contribute to its higher overall values compared to other levels of the building.
The analysis involved a thorough examination of heating and cooling needs on all levels of the building,
taking into account the specific characteristics of each zone and floor. The results provide valuable
insights into the varying requirements for climate control across different levels. For more details, the
checksum reports are in the appendix for more detail. A comprehensive building load consisting of 184
tons of cooling, and 162,880 BTU/h of heating.

The energy consumption of the building and the system was calculated in TRACE 3D Plus. The software
uses square footage to calculate the energy used to cool and heat the building, as well as the plug load
density and the lighting among other things. Using an average plug load density of 1.27 W/ft2 the energy
used by interior receptacles like printers, and computers comes out to be 415,11.60 kWh of energy and a
demand of 86.44 kW. This was the largest electrical load for the building. For energy used by lights, a
lighting density was used of 0.9 W/ft2. The lighting would use 264,225.70 kWh and have a demand of
87.59 kW. The cooling energy use was 358,542.20 kWh and 168.06 kW of demand while the heating
energy use was 136,317.30 kWh and a demand of 218.55 kW. Lastly, the fans used 80,143.09 kWh of
energy and 16.51 kW of demand. Below in figure 17, you can see the breakdown of the energy use in a
chart. The total annual electrical consumption of the building totals 1,254,731 kWh with an annual peak
electrical demand of 351 kW. Based on the given electrical utility cost of 0.145 US dollars per kWh for a
business building, the cost of energy per year totals $181,935.99 US dollars.

18
 Figure 17: Energy use of the building
To quantify thermal comfort and indoor air quality the building's unmet cooling and heating loads can be
observed in TRACE 3D Plus. After running the simulation it shows there are zero hours where the
cooling loads are unmet and only 8 hours where the building's heating loads are unmet, which is still in
the green zone.

Figure 18: Building performance of hours unmet hours of cooling and heating
The efficiency of the fan wall of the AHU-1 is 88.5% for the motors. The fan wall will be composed of
two Toshiba 5 hp fans totaling 10 hp. For AHU-2 the motor efficiency is 88.5% with six Toshiba 9 hp
motors. AHU-3 has four Toshiba 10 hp motors that run at 90.2% efficiency. AHU-4 has one 10.5 hp
Toshiba motor that is 91% efficient. The last AHU-5 that serves the automated book retrieval area has a
5-hp Toshiba motor with 87% efficiency. To make the efficiency of motors better a VFD will be installed
on all AHU motors
Discussion
There are strengths and weaknesses in the proposed design. One of the required components, Variable Air
Volume (VAV) systems offer several advantages, including enhanced energy efficiency through
demand-based airflow adjustments, resulting in reduced energy consumption, especially under partial load
conditions. Additionally, they provide zoned control, allowing for personalized comfort and energy
savings by regulating airflow and temperature independently in different zones or rooms. VAV systems
contribute to improved indoor air quality by adjusting ventilation rates based on occupancy and
ventilation requirements, thus minimizing the risk of stale air. Moreover, they operate at lower fan speeds,
reducing noise levels within the occupied space. However, these systems entail higher initial costs due to
the complexity of controls and zoning equipment required. They also demand sophisticated control

19
systems, potentially requiring specialized expertise for installation and maintenance. Furthermore,
improper design or commissioning may lead to air balancing issues, compromising comfort and
efficiency. Despite these challenges, with proper design, installation, and maintenance, VAV systems offer
flexibility and energy savings while ensuring occupants' comfort and well-being.
Direct Expansion (DX) reheat systems for the VAVs offer several advantages. They are often more energy
efficient than water reheat systems due to the absence of energy losses associated with water distribution
and pumping. Additionally, DX systems typically require less space for equipment installation, making
them suitable for buildings with limited space constraints. Maintenance requirements are generally lower
for DX systems compared to water reheat systems, resulting in potentially reduced downtime and
maintenance costs. DX systems provide rapid response to changing heating demands, offering precise
temperature control and improved comfort. However, DX systems may have limited capacity, especially
for larger buildings or systems with high heating demands, and require careful design and sizing to ensure
proper operation. Concerns related to refrigerant handling and disposal also need to be addressed to
mitigate environmental impact and comply with regulations. The DX VAV was chosen for the library
because of how temperature the climate is in Sao Paulo Brazil. The system parameters for the library will
not have extreme temperature differences and this was a key point in determining the type of VAV reheat
that will be used for the design.
Direct Expansion (DX) AHUs offer several advantages. They are typically more energy efficient than
other AHU types, thanks to their direct cooling or heating method, coupled with efficient compressors and
refrigerants. DX units also require less space, making them suitable for installations with limited space
availability. Installation is relatively quick and straightforward compared to other AHU types, potentially
resulting in lower installation costs. Additionally, DX units allow for individual zoning and precise
temperature control, offering flexibility in managing different zones or areas within a building. However,
DX units have their limitations. They use refrigerants, which may raise environmental concerns and
require careful handling and disposal. Capacity limitations may be a concern for larger buildings or
systems with high cooling or heating demands, potentially necessitating multiple units or additional
equipment. Maintenance of refrigerant-based systems requires specialized expertise and may entail higher
costs. Moreover, DX units may experience reduced efficiency during extreme weather conditions, which
could affect overall system performance and energy consumption. The DX AHU was chosen for the
library because of how temperature the climate is in Sao Paulo Brazil. Again, the system parameters for
the library will not have extreme temperature differences and this was a key point in determining the type
of AHU that will be used for the design.
Several other proposed systems were considered for the library. One considered system would be water
reheat systems for VAVs. They present their own set of pros and cons. They typically offer higher heating
capacities compared to DX reheat systems, making them suitable for larger buildings or systems with
high heating demands. Water reheat systems are versatile and can utilize various heat sources, providing
flexibility in design and operation. Additionally, water has excellent heat transfer properties, allowing for
efficient heating and distribution within the building, particularly in hydronic systems. These systems are
often easier to control and integrate with building automation systems, offering centralized control and
optimization of heating operations. However, water reheat systems require extensive piping and
infrastructure for water distribution, increasing installation complexity and potentially requiring additional
space. Maintenance requirements may also be higher, particularly for boilers, pumps, and associated
equipment. Energy losses associated with water distribution and pumping can reduce overall efficiency,
and water quality issues such as corrosion and microbial growth may need to be addressed. Additionally,

20
water reheat systems may have longer response times compared to DX systems, potentially leading to
slower temperature adjustments and reduced comfort control.
Other types of AHUs were considered as well. Non-DX AHUs, which encompass various heat sources
such as hot water, steam, or chilled water, offer their own set of advantages. They provide versatility in
design and operation, accommodating different heating and cooling needs. Non-DX AHUs typically offer
higher capacity compared to DX units, making them suitable for larger buildings or systems with high
demands. Some non-DX AHUs can incorporate energy recovery systems, improving overall energy
efficiency by recovering waste heat or cooling from exhaust air. Furthermore, they eliminate the need for
refrigerants, reducing environmental concerns associated with refrigerant handling and disposal.
However, non-DX AHUs have their drawbacks. They tend to have higher installation costs due to the
additional equipment required, such as boilers, heat exchangers, or piping. Additionally, they require
more space for installation, potentially limiting their suitability for installations with space constraints.
Non-DX AHUs are also more complex in terms of design, installation, and operation, requiring
specialized expertise and maintenance. Maintenance requirements may be higher, especially for
components such as boilers, heat exchangers, or pumps, potentially increasing maintenance costs and
downtime. Moreover, they may offer less individual zoning and control compared to DX units, limiting
flexibility in managing different zones or areas within a building independently.
The type of return air for the design that was chosen is a plenum return. A plenum return system offers
several advantages, including space-saving benefits by utilizing the area above the ceiling as a return air
space, eliminating the need for dedicated return ductwork, and reducing material and labor costs. Its
simplified installation process and flexibility in building design make it a compelling choice for projects
with evolving layouts. However, concerns regarding air quality maintenance arise as plenum returns can
accumulate dust and contaminants from the space above the ceiling, potentially impacting indoor air
quality and necessitating regular cleaning. Additionally, noise transmission may be a concern, and airflow
control may be less precise compared to return ducting systems. Fire safety precautions are crucial as
plenum returns can serve as pathways for fire and smoke propagation if not properly constructed and
fire-rated. On the other hand, return ducting systems provide improved air quality control through the
integration of filters and other air cleaning devices, as well as enhanced noise reduction measures. Their
precise airflow control ensures balanced distribution throughout the building, contributing to occupant
comfort. However, these systems require dedicated space for ductwork, leading to increased space
requirements and higher installation costs. Their complex installation process and maintenance
requirements may also pose challenges and air leakage at joints and connections can impact system
efficiency. The plenum return assumption for the library was made primarily based on the building layout,
budget constraints, and careful consideration of the pros and cons of other methods of return air.

21
Conclusion
In summary, the system configuration consists of an AHU with a DX System utilizing VAV reheat at each
zone for temperature control, with a return air plenum. Trane Trace Modeling software was used in space
zoning, conducting heat/cooling load calculations, determining CFM requirements, and evaluating energy
needs. AutoCAD was utilized for precise drawings of duct layout and sizing, ensuring efficient airflow for
space distribution. Equipment selection, including VAV units, mini-splits, and AHU DX units, was
sourced from local vendors/providers Roberts LLC and Nortek. The projected costs include an annual
energy expenditure of $181,935.99 and a total initial investment of $1,428,500 for major equipment.
Throughout the design process, the ASHRAE Standards were meticulously followed to ensure a safe and
well-established HVAC system that can perform up to the standards and expectations. This
comprehensive approach ensures both operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness in meeting project
requirements.
There are several suggestions for future research and improvements. The first would be to further explore
the feasibility of integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar thermal or geothermal heat, to
supplement or offset energy consumption from conventional heating and cooling systems, reducing
reliance on fossil fuels and lowering operational costs. Also, a potential improvement would be to adopt
smart building technologies, such as Building Management Systems (BMS) or Internet of Things (IoT)
devices, to enhance system monitoring, control, and optimization. These technologies can provide
real-time data insights, allowing for proactive maintenance, fault detection, and energy optimization
strategies. Another area of research would be innovative air filtration technologies or air purification
systems to enhance indoor air quality beyond standard filtration methods. Also, assess the system's
resilience to extreme weather events or climate change impacts, such as heatwaves, floods, or power
outages. Explore strategies to enhance system robustness and reliability, such as redundant equipment
configurations, thermal energy storage, or grid-interactive HVAC systems that can contribute to grid
stability during peak demand periods. In terms of the actual design phase, the use of the program Revitt,
which is a 3D modeling software, might provide better insight into the overall design of the proposed
system.

22
References
[1] “About ASHRAE | ashrae.org.” ASHRAE, https://www.ashrae.org/about. Accessed 4 October 2023.

[2] “Largest Cities By Population in 2023 | MacroTrends.” Macrotrends,

https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/largest-cities-by-population. Accessed 4 October 2023.

[3] “CLASSIFICAÇÃO CLIMÁTICA DE KÖPPEN E DE THORNTHWAITE E SUA APLICABILIDADE

NA DETERMINAÇÃO DE ZONAS AGROCLIMÁTICAS PARA O E.” SciELO,

https://www.scielo.br/j/brag/a/NpCWHvyYzzHDFTp6LVyGg5g/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Accessed 4 October

2023.

[4] “VAV Variable Air Volume - HVAC system basics hvacr.” YouTube, 18 October 2020,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw-bAbjPTd8. Accessed 6 October 2023.

[5] Howell, Ronald Hunter, et al. Principles of Heating, Ventilating, and Air Conditioning: A Textbook with

Design Data Based on the 2021 ASHRAE Handbook--Fundamentals. ASHRAE, 2021.

[6] “A Framework for Ethical Decision Making - Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.” Santa Clara

University, 5 November 2021,

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/. Accessed 12

November 2023.

[7] “Engineering Innovative Air Distribution Solutions | Redefine Your Comfort Zone - Diffusers.” Titus

HVAC, https://www.titus-hvac.com/Products/Diffusers. Accessed 28 April 2024.

23
Appendices

A. Calculations

24
25
26
27
28
C. Equipment Schedules and info

29
30
D. Drawings

31
 5 4 3 2 1

2"
1"

KEYNOTES:
1/2"

1.
0

D D

1 1.6 2 2.3 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 CC 8 8.4 9 9.7

AA

15'-2 1/2" 14'-9 1/2" 9'-1" 20'-11" 30'-0" 30'-0" 32'-6" 27'-6" 27'-6" 17'-6" 15'-0" 19'-0"

BB

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
A.5
A.5

B B

EE BB

C C
DD

C
D-1
CORRIDOR
C ASHRAE 2023-2024
55 CFM
STOR

STUDENT DESIGN
D-1
6Ø 015
30 CFM
AUTOMATED STORAGE
AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM 018
6Ø

ACCESS
016
D-1

55 CFM

6Ø
D-1

55 CFM

6Ø
D-1

55 CFM

6Ø
D-1

55 CFM

6Ø
T
(VAV-#)

VAV

B-09
T
(VAV-#)
COMPETITION
WATER RECLAMATION
8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø VAV

B-08 AUTOMATED STORAGE

017
AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
6"Ø ASRS1
T
(VAV-#)

D-1
TELECOM
AA
PUBLIC LIBRARY
D-1
30 CFM

6Ø 019 90 CFM

EF-1 6Ø

JANITOR 420 CFM

14"X14" FCU
TYPICAL X6
D-1
007 10X10

60 CFM
MENS IT STORAGE ELEC 1

6Ø 008 011B 013

D-1

50 CFM

WOMENS 6Ø

C.8 006
T
VAV

B-01 C.8
(VAV-#) STAIR 2 T
(VAV-#)

D MEETING D-1
D-1

50 CFM

6Ø
6"Ø
D-1
D-1

25 CFM
ST2-0

D
SAN PAULO, BRAZIL
004 D-1
60 CFM
SHOWER ELEC
30 CFM
6Ø HALL VAV

60 CFM 6Ø COATS 6Ø
B-06

009 012 014

STORAGE 6Ø
005

D.1 004A
ZOOM 12"Ø D.1
VAV D-1
003
8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø B-03
8"Ø 60 CFM

6Ø

14"X12"
ELEV 1 HALL

MATCHLINE - A
10"Ø

MATCHLINE - B
EL1 002 D-1

50 CFM 20"X14" TO
D-1 6Ø
AHU ON 20"X14"
80 CFM

6Ø LEVEL 3 Project Manager

VAV

D-1

60 CFM
T
(VAV-#)
B-02

CC Project Designer
VESTIBULE IT OPEN OFFICE IT WORK AREA SUPPLY
6Ø

011 011A D-1

020 Project Architect
001
10"Ø 50 CFM 14"X14" 26"X20" TO
D-1 D-1
Landscape Architect
D.6 D.6
6Ø
80 CFM 80 CFM
D-1
AHU ON
6Ø 6Ø
D-1 80 CFM
LEVEL 3 Civil Engineer
50 CFM 6Ø

6Ø 40"X14" Structural Engineer

D.8 30"X14"
D.8 Mechanical Engineer
T
(VAV-#)
Electrical Engineer
BREAK/WORK ELEV 2 20"X12"
Plumbing Engineer
E 025B EL2 Interior Designer

VAV

B-04A
STAIR 3
ST3-0
E
10" Ø 16" Ø

B B Sheet Reviewer
E.3 D-2

245 CFM

8Ø
D-2

245 CFM

8Ø
D-2

245 CFM

8Ø
E.3
D-1

D-1
60 CFM

20"X12" 100 CFM

6Ø

6Ø

OPEN OFFICE
025
JANITOR
021
6"Ø T
E.6 (VAV-#)
E.6
VAV

B-07

D-2 D-2
D-1

60 CFM
16"Ø
E.9 245 CFM

8Ø
260 CFM

8Ø
6Ø
E.9

10"Ø 14"Ø 10"Ø

F F

D-2 D-2
AUTOMATED STORAGE D-2 D-2

260 CFM 260 CFM

AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM 150 CFM 150 CFM

8Ø 8Ø RETRIEVAL 8Ø 8Ø

023

T
(VAV-#)

VAV

B-04B
14"Ø T D-2 D-2

(VAV-#)
150 CFM 150 CFM

D-1 8Ø 8Ø

F.7 12"X12" 50 CFM

6Ø
F.7
TYPICAL X6

WORK SHOPS / ILL / OUTREACH LOADING DOCK

025A 024 022

D-2
VAV

B-05 8"Ø 8"Ø

G
D-2 D-2
260 CFM
150 CFM 150 CFM
8Ø
8Ø 8Ø

Y
H.1 H.1 N

AR
TIO
UC

IN
R
ST

IM
O N
C

EL
R
FO

PR
T
NO

A A
Sheet Name
1 1.6 2 2.3 EE 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 DD 9 9.7

MECHANICAL FLOOR
PLAN - LEVEL
1 MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL B01 - OVERALL B01 - OVERALL
M-100 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
Sheet Number

0 4' 8' 16'

M-100B
5 4 3 2 1
 5 4 3 2 1

2"
1"
1/2"
0

D 1 1.6 2 2.3 3 4 5 5.7 AA 6 7 8 8.4 9 9.7 D

CC

BB

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
A.5 A.5

B B

EE BB
COLLECTION LOBBY VESTIBULE
110 112 111
10"Ø
270CFM
RG-1

DD
C SERVICE DESK SELF CHECK
C
110A 110B

C 8"Ø 10"Ø C
WOMENS 125CFM 270CFM

ASHRAE 2023-2024
106
ELEV 3 ELEV 4
EL3 EL4 STAIR 4
EG-1 EG-1 EG-1
ST4-1
RG-1
AUTOMATED STORAGE
8"Ø
150CFM
12" X 10"
AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
ASRS1 8"Ø
190CFM
10"Ø
230CFM
UP
10"Ø 10"Ø
230CFM
10"Ø
270CFM
STUDENT DESIGN
T 230CFM

VESTIBULE
100
10"Ø LOBBY
1 101 D-2 Typ. 1

8"Ø
6"Ø 103
30CFM
HALL JANITOR
105
EG-1
6"Ø
30CFM
EG-1
8"Ø
EG-1 TELECOM
127
MEETING
126 RG-1
T
RG-1 RG-1 RG-1 RG-1
16
"Ø
14
"Ø
14
"Ø
10"Ø COMPETITION
D-2 Typ.
160 CFM 270CFM
301 CFM
VAV 8Ø
VAV

2
26" X 20" CULTURAL COMMONS SEATING CAFE SEATING
AA 8"Ø
10 Ø
1

10"Ø 8"Ø 14" X 12"

MENS 28" X 22" RG-1 8"Ø
10"Ø
10"Ø 122
10"Ø 120 117 113
104 14"Ø 125CFM 230CFM
150CFM D-2 Typ. 1
230CFM 230CFM
T
RG-1 "Ø
24" X 18" 12 RG-1
PUBLIC LIBRARY
301 CFM

10 Ø
VAV

3
RG-1 8"Ø
8"Ø HALL 205CFM
"Ø
D-3 Typ. 1

6"Ø 6"Ø 129

RG-1 190CFM D-3 Typ. 1 1361 CFM
VAV 18 "Ø T
30CFM 30CFM
C.8 C.8
18 Ø

14
1361 CFM

8"Ø 18 Ø
VAV
T
13

FAMILY HALL 8"Ø

12
18"Ø 18"Ø 10"Ø
149 145 STAIR 2
190CFM
ELEC 190CFM RG-1 MEETING D-2 Typ. 1
HALL RG-1 270CFM
RG-1 ST2-1 1140 CFM 40" X 24" 1 D-2 Typ. 8"Ø ELEC
128 130 125
T
6"Ø 18 Ø
VAV
1361 CFM
205CFM
D D
9 VAV
114
8"Ø
14 Ø

6"Ø ELEC 30CFM 14

CAFE PREP STAIR 5

EG-1 RG-1
EG-1
10"Ø 30CFM148 42" X 30"
46" X 32" D-2 Typ. 1
117A ST5-1 205CFM
SAN PAULO, BRAZIL
D.1 STORAGE 1 D-1 Typ. 40" X 24" 8"Ø 650 CFM
VAV
EG-1 D.1
T 147A 6"Ø 60 CFM
125CFM 14 Ø
15
MENS
VAV

4
6Ø RG-1
6"Ø 30CFM 8"Ø 26" X 18" T 115

60CFM RG-1 6"Ø 8" X 8" 14"Ø

ELEV 1 8"Ø

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
EL1 RG-1 10"Ø 30CFM 8"Ø 8"Ø T
10"Ø
CATERING KITCH

8"Ø 270CFM MEETING 130CFM 130CFM EG-1

6"Ø 14"Ø RG-1 RG-1 WOMENS
131
150CFM 116
147

6"Ø 10"Ø
14" X 12" 8"Ø 14"Ø
OP WALL 1
10"Ø 14" X 12"
8"Ø
125CFM
RG-1 CC
Project Manager
D-1 Typ.

140A 60 CFM 190CFM

8"Ø 10"Ø 6Ø
VAV
8" X 8"
150CFM 270CFM
5
1 D-2 Typ.
Project Designer
D.6 STORAGEVAV
250 CFM

14"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø

D.6 Project Architect
PRE-FUNCTION SERVING 6
10 Ø

144 RG-1 130CFM 130CFM 10"Ø

150 150A 16"Ø STAIR 3 HALL
Landscape Architect
ST3-1 132
T 10"Ø 1 D-2 Typ.

8"Ø
D.8 D.8 Civil Engineer
453 CFM

10"Ø VAV

16
12 Ø

190CFM
Structural Engineer
T 8"Ø 12"Ø 12"Ø 8"Ø
8"Ø Mechanical Engineer
D-3 Typ. 1 1 D-3 Typ.
125CFM RG-1 RG-1 227CFM 227CFM
1087 CFM
VAV VAV
1087 CFM 14"Ø T E Electrical Engineer
RG-1
16 Ø
7a 7b 16 Ø
ELEV 2
EL2 T Plumbing Engineer
E 6"Ø
VESTIBULE D-2 Typ. 1
T Interior Designer
65CFM RG-1 8"Ø 8"Ø
16"Ø 16"Ø 121
330 CFM
VAV
RG-1
STORAGE 10"Ø
ZOOM
227CFM 227CFM 10 Ø
17

T 10"Ø 10"Ø 143 8"Ø

RG-1 135B
10"Ø 10"Ø MEETING
270CFM 270CFM 190CFM 10"Ø
E.3 D-2 Typ.
T
1
10"Ø 10"Ø
119
E.3
B 16"Ø
645 CFM

14 Ø
VAV

10
D-2 Typ.

752 CFM
1
250CFM D-4 Typ. 1
250CFM B Sheet Reviewer
VAV 11 500 CFM

RG-1 T 10"Ø 11
14 Ø
10 Ø
VAV

8"Ø 8"Ø 18

BREAK/WORK
110CFM 110CFM
10"Ø 135A
OP WALL
140B

E.6 12"Ø 12"Ø E.6

RG-1 RG-1 14"Ø
10"Ø 10"Ø
220CFM 220CFM 6"Ø
65CFM
E.9 10"Ø
8"Ø
10"Ø 8"Ø E.9
5'-0"
110CFM
F RG-1
110CFM
STORAGE
RG-1 16"Ø
6"Ø
142
F
10"Ø 65CFM
14"Ø 10"Ø

6"Ø
RG-1 RG-1
6"Ø 65CFM
COMMUNITY ROOM AV STORAGE WOMENS MENS OFFICE 8"Ø 10"Ø
OPEN OFFICE
12"Ø 12"Ø 8"Ø
140 141 139 138 136 135
T 110CFM 110CFM
10"Ø
VAV
D-1 Typ. 1
6"Ø
10"Ø 8 65 CFM EG-1 EG-1 RG-1
220CFM
6Ø 65CFM
220CFM
RG-1 RG-1
HALL 10"Ø 10"Ø
16"Ø
137
10"Ø
8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø RG-1 8"Ø
F.7 125CFM 125CFM 125CFM 125CFM F.7
12"Ø

10"Ø
220CFM

G G

H.1 H.1

Y
N

AR
TIO
UC

IN
R
ST

IM
O N
C

EL
R
FO

PR
T
NO

A 1 1.6 2 2.3 EE 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 DD 9 9.7 A

Sheet Name

HVAC FLOOR PLAN -

LEVEL 1 - OVERALL
1 HVAC FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 1 - OVERALL
M-101 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
Sheet Number

NORTH

0 4' 8' 16'

M-101
5 4 3 2 1
 5 4 3 2 1

2"
1"
1/2"
0

D D

1 1.6 2 2.3 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 9 9.7

BB

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
A.5
A.5

D-2 D-2 D-2 D-2

230 CFM 230 CFM 230 CFM 230 CFM

8Ø 8Ø 8Ø 8Ø

D-2

B 155 CFM

8Ø

D-2

155 CFM D-2

8Ø 155 CFM

EE
D-2

B
8Ø
155 CFM

8Ø

D-2 D-2
D-2 D-2
D-2
230 CFM 230 CFM
230 CFM 230 CFM
230 CFM
8Ø 8Ø
8Ø 8Ø
8Ø

D-2
D-2
D-2
230 CFM
155 CFM

BB
155 CFM
8Ø
8Ø
8Ø

OPEN TO
BELOW OPEN TO
ABOVE &
18"Ø VAV
VAV

M-08D 18"Ø BELOW

M-08C

D-3 D-3
VAV
385 CFM 385 CFM
M-09
10 Ø 10 Ø
14"Ø D-2
D-2
155 CFM
155 CFM
8Ø D-2
8Ø
155 CFM

T
C (VAV-#)
T
(VAV-#)
T
(VAV-#)
8Ø D-2

155 CFM
DD C
8Ø

D-2
D-2
D-2 155 CFM

D-2 D-2
D-2

190 CFM
SEATING 190 CFM
8Ø
STAIR 4 D-2 D-2

190 CFM
8Ø 155 CFM 155 CFM
190 CFM 190 CFM
8Ø 8Ø M110 ST4-M
D-3 D-3 8Ø 8Ø
8Ø 8Ø
385 CFM 385 CFM

10 Ø 10 Ø

C C
ASHRAE 2023-2024
D-2

155 CFM

8Ø

18"Ø WOMENS UP
DN
T M105 ELEV 3 ELEV 4

STUDENT DESIGN
(VAV-#)
D-2 EL3 EL4
MEETING 280 CFM

M103 8Ø
AUTOMATED STORAGE
D-3
D-1
EF-1
AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEM
D-3

COMPETITION
50 CFM
385 CFM 385 CFM D-1 350 CFM
ASRS1
6Ø
10 Ø 10 Ø 50 CFM 9X9

6Ø D-3

370 CFM

D-1

90 CFM
HALL FCU
10 Ø

6Ø
M104 TELECOM 1
MEETING 40"X18" D-2

155 CFM

M127 M126 D-1 8Ø

18"Ø 40 CFM

6Ø
HALL OFFICE MENS
AA
PUBLIC LIBRARY
VAV

OPEN TO M-08B
M102 M101 M106
BELOW

8"Ø
VAV

M-08A
HALL HALL
10"Ø M129 M125
VAV

26"Ø M-02

C.8 JANITOR D-1 T

C.8
M107 STAIR 2 ELEC 40 CFM
(VAV-#)

T ST2-M MEETING
SAN PAULO, BRAZIL
(VAV-#)
M128 D-1 6Ø

VAV
40 CFM
M130
D-2 D-2 D-1
14"Ø M-05

D D
6Ø
330 CFM 330 CFM
10"Ø D-1
15 CFM

6Ø
T
(VAV-#)
8Ø 8Ø D-3
40 CFM

ELEC 6Ø
370 CFM
40"X20"
D-1 10 Ø

M108
D.1 90 CFM

6Ø
6"Ø
D.1
D-1

90 CFM

OPEN OFFICE 6Ø
BREAK/WORK
6"Ø
D-3

370 CFM
50"X20"
M100 M100A 10 Ø

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
VAV
VAV
M-04
M-07
MEETING
M131 STAIR 5
D-1 30"X14" Project Manager
ST5-1
50 CFM

18"Ø VAV
VAV
M-03 M-10 6Ø
Project Designer
CC
Project Architect
Landscape Architect
D.6 D-2

330 CFM
D-2

330 CFM
40"X18" T D-1 D.6
Civil Engineer
(VAV-#)
8Ø 8Ø 50 CFM

STAIR 3 6Ø
6"Ø
ST3-M CORRIDOR Structural Engineer
FINISHED
D.8 M132
M-11
VAV
ROOM BELOW D.8 Mechanical Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Plumbing Engineer
E ELEV 2
E Interior Designer
EL2
D-3

D-2 D-2
370 CFM

10 Ø
30"X14"
330 CFM 330 CFM

8Ø 8Ø

B B Sheet Reviewer
E.3 E.3
T
(VAV-#)
FINISHED 16"Ø
D-2 ROOM BELOW
330 CFM

8Ø

VAV

M-06

E.6 E.6
OPEN OFFICE
D-3
M135 D-3
20"X14"
370 CFM 370 CFM

E.9 10 Ø 10 Ø

E.9

F D-1

40 CFM
F
6Ø

D-3

BREAK/WORK ZOOM ZOOM 370 CFM

M136A M136B 10 Ø
D-3 M137A D-3 D-3

380 CFM 380 CFM 380 CFM

10 Ø 10 Ø 10 Ø

T 6"Ø M-12
VAV

(VAV-#)
T
(VAV-#)

STORAGE HALL
M138 M137

14"Ø
VAV

M-01

F.7 F.7

G G

Y
H.1 H.1 N

AR
TIO
UC

IN
R
ST

IM
O N
C

EL
R
FO

PR
T
NO

A A
Sheet Name
1 1.6 2 2.3 EE 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 DD 9 9.7

HVAC FLOOR PLAN -

LEVEL MEZZANINE -
1 HVAC FLOOR PLAN - MEZZANINE - OVERALL OVERALL
M-101M SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
Sheet Number

NORTH

0 4' 8' 16'

M-101M
5 4 3 2 1
 5 4 3 2 1

2"
1"
1/2"
0

D D

1 1.6 2 2.3 3 4 5 5.7 AA 6 7 CC 8 8.4 9 9.7

BB

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
A.5
A.5

OPEN TO
BELOW RG-1
B 14"Ø 10"Ø
10"Ø
10"Ø
10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø

EE 14"Ø
B
RG-1 RG-1 10"Ø T
10"Ø 10"Ø
10"Ø RG-1
OPEN AREA
10"Ø RG-1 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø
10"Ø 10"Ø RG-1
200 10"Ø RG-1
RG-1
RG-1
10"Ø
CHILDRENS BB
T
14"Ø 14"Ø 16"Ø 18"Ø VAV 23 16"Ø VAV 24 16"Ø 16"Ø 211
14"Ø
T
RG-1 16"Ø D-2 D-2

167 CFM 167 CFM

10"Ø 8Ø 8Ø RG-1 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø

10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø
10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø D-2
RG-1 RG-1
SERVICE DESK 10"Ø 153 CFM RG-1
200A 8Ø

VAV 25 20"Ø 18"Ø 18"Ø 18"Ø 10"Ø

RG-1 RG-1
22"Ø 20"Ø
T 20"Ø RG-1
T
C 12"Ø RG-1
VAV 26 18"Ø DD C
12"Ø 22"Ø
D-2
20"Ø 20"Ø
12"Ø 22"Ø 10"Ø 24"x20"
129 CFM

8Ø

TECH LAB WORK ROOM8"Ø 8"ØHALL MEETING/VR MEETING VAV 22 38"x24" 18"Ø
T 201 T 202 203 207 208 D-2
STAIR 4 18"Ø
20"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø 154 CFM
D-2
8Ø
ST4-2 24"x20"
C C
134 CFM

TECH LAB
WOMEN
206
8Ø

8"Ø
VAV 11
14"Ø

D-3
14"Ø
ELEV 3 ELEV 4 48"x34"
T

UP DN RG-1
EG-1
WELLNESS
213
ASHRAE 2023-2024
STUDENT DESIGN
201
12"Ø 12"Ø T
EG-1 EG-1 EG-1 255 EL3 EL4
10 Ø
AUTOMATED STORAGE VAV 12
14"Ø
14"Ø WOMEN
AND RETRIEVAL
12"Ø SYSTEM
EF-1 ASRS1
EATING/SEATING EG-1
214

RG-1
14"Ø
RG-1
10"Ø

RG-1
211A

COMPETITION
20"Ø 12"Ø VAV 13
10"Ø MEN
EG-1 EG-1 TELECOM MEETING EG-1
D-2 EG-1 D-3
227 226
215
RG-1 196 CFM
D-4
12"Ø 342 CFM

8Ø
430 CFM
10 Ø OPEN TO
AA 12 Ø
BELOW

PUBLIC LIBRARY
VAV 10
14"Ø VAV 9
RG-1 MEN
204 20"Ø 10"Ø
RG-1 D-2
10"Ø HALL
T 212 VAV 29
6"Ø
125 CFM

14"Ø VAV 8
JANITOR CORRIDOR 12"Ø 8Ø HALL CORRIDOR
RG-1
D-2
16"Ø 16"Ø 12"Ø 229 225 T D-1

161 CFM
VAV 7 12"Ø 205 260 VAV 14
10"Ø 8"Ø T
T
46 CFM
T T
C.8 8Ø
D-2

121 CFM
RG-1
12"Ø
6Ø

6"Ø RG-1 C.8

8Ø
STAIR 2 20"Ø RG-1
ELEC ZOOM RG-1
ZOOM
EG-1
SAN PAULO, BRAZIL
ST2-2 228 229A 229B
T T
12"Ø VAV 15

D D-1
6"Ø 10"Ø 10"Ø
ELEC FAMILY
D
ELEC
48"x34" EG-1
12"Ø 36"x24"
25 CFM

6Ø 217 216
RG-1 262
D.1 6"Ø
T
OFFICE - CP 14"Ø D.1
10"Ø 10"Ø 20"Ø 230
12"Ø COMPUTER LAB AUDIO PRODUCTION MEDIA PRODUCTION 12"Ø RG-1
265 RG-1 20"Ø264 20"Ø 263 RG-1
EG-1WELLNESS D-1

14"Ø
10"Ø

MATCHLINE - A
VAV 21

MATCHLINE - B
20"Ø
36 CFM
261 VAV 3
6Ø

RG-1 6"Ø D-2

185 CFM

14"Ø RETURN GRILL T

D-3 D-2 12"Ø D-1
FROM PLENUM 8Ø STAIR 5
12"Ø 20"Ø TO CHASE 30X30
RG-1 18"Ø
267 CFM

6"Ø
124 CFM 52 CFM

6"Ø OFFICE - CP VAV 28 ST5-2

Project Manager
CC
8Ø

10"Ø VAV 4
10 Ø 6Ø

231
16"Ø 18"Ø 20"Ø 54"x40" 18"Ø VAV 20 18"Ø VAV 16 8"Ø 18"Ø Project Designer
VAV 6 18"Ø 48"x26" MEN CORRIDOR
D-4

VAV 27 388 CFM 18"Ø 12"Ø

D-4
EG-1
248 247
20"Ø
D-3
12 Ø
Project Architect
6"Ø
260 CFM

12"Ø 36"x20"
D.6 12"Ø
270 CFM

12 Ø STORAGE EF-1
10 Ø
12"Ø D.6 Landscape Architect
D-4
VAV 5 263A 10"Ø 10"Ø
418 CFM RETURN GRILL CORRIDOR 18"Ø Civil Engineer
RG-1 FROM PLENUM
232 RG-1
12 Ø
TO CHASE 30X30
12"Ø 12"Ø Structural Engineer
RG-1
D.8 RG-1
EG-1 WOMEN
249
MEN
T
T D.8 Mechanical Engineer
246
12"Ø EG-1
26"x18" Electrical Engineer
RG-1 RG-1
E RG-1 E Plumbing Engineer
T
RG-1 T
RG-1 RG-1 ELEV 2 Interior Designer
EG-1 EL2
ACTIVITY/LITTLE'S LAB WORK ROOM
WOMEN 219 218
OFFICE - ADMIN OFFICE - ADMIN OFFICE - ADMIN OFFICE - ADMIN STORAGE 245
16"Ø
12"Ø
253 252 251 250 247A 10"Ø 14"Ø 12"Ø 10"Ø
STAIR 3
6"Ø 6"Ø 6"Ø ST3-2

B 30"x16" 8"Ø B Sheet Reviewer

E.3 T T OFFICE - ADMIN E.3
244
6"Ø 12"Ø 12"Ø
14"Ø 16"Ø OPEN OFFICE
12"Ø WORK ROOM 235
8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø VAV 1b VAV 2 6"Ø RG-1 235A
10"Ø 12"Ø D-2
D-1

8"Ø 97 CFM
55 CFM
12"Ø
8"Ø 14"Ø 8Ø
6Ø
12"Ø
OPEN OFFICE
8"Ø OFFICE - HR D-2
10"Ø
240 VAV 1a 243
6"Ø 168 CFM

8"Ø 8"Ø
E.6 E.6
D-2

8"Ø 118 CFM

8Ø

8Ø RG-1 VAV 17
22"Ø
RG-1 8"Ø 8"Ø
8"Ø 16"Ø 12"Ø 10"Ø
E.9 RG-1
E.9
6"Ø 12"Ø
12"Ø
OFFICE - ADMIN 30"x16"
RG-1 RG-1
F 8"Ø
242
F
10"Ø 6"Ø OFFICE 8"Ø
236
D-1
RG-1
6"Ø
39 CFM

6Ø
10"Ø
8"Ø BREAK/WORK VAV 18 8"Ø
OFFICE - DO 237A VAV 19
241 RG-1 D-2
6"Ø RG-1 6"Ø
RG-1 93 CFM

8"Ø 8"Ø 8Ø
RG-1 RG-1 T

8"Ø T
8"Ø
14"Ø 8"Ø
12"Ø 16"Ø
8"Ø HALL
8"Ø ZOOM ZOOM
10"Ø RG-1
237 8"Ø 238A 8"Ø
238B

F.7 8"Ø
F.7
10"Ø

14"Ø

G
G

H.1 H.1

Y
N

AR
TIO
UC

IN
R
ST

IM
O N
C

EL
R
FO

PR
T
NO

A A
1 1.6 2 DD Sheet Name
2.3 EE 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 9 9.7

HVAC FLOOR PLAN -

LEVEL 2 - OVERALL
1 HVAC FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 2 - OVERALL
M-102 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
Sheet Number

NORTH

0 4' 8' 16'

M-101M
5 4 3 2 1
 5 4 3 2 1

2"
1"
1/2"
0

D
LEVEL 3 D

1 1.6 2 2.3 3 4 5 5.7 AA 6 7 8 8.4 9 9.7

BB

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
A.5 A.5

OPEN TO D-2 D-2

ROOF BELOW 580CFM 580CFM
D-1 8"Ø 8"Ø
580CFM RG-1 RG-1
6"Ø
10"Ø D-3
580CFM
VAV 19 T 10"Ø D-2 D-1
D-2 D-2
B 125CFM 125CFM 22"Ø 14"Ø 14"Ø 12"Ø 580CFM 580CFM B
D-3 D-4 8"Ø 6"Ø
8"Ø 8"Ø D-1
ARCHIVE STORAGE D-1 12"Ø
55CFM 230CFM D-3 580CFM 8"Ø
EG-1 305 10"Ø D-2 55CFM D-3 D-4 10"Ø
6"Ø 10"Ø 230CFM
55CFM 6"Ø 230CFM 580CFM
EE 6"Ø
VAV 14
VAV 15 8"Ø
VIEWING
10"Ø HISTORIC CONF 10"Ø BB
FIREPLACE
D-1 305A D-2 D-2 308

EG-1 125CFM T 55CFM 55CFM VAV 18

22"Ø
12"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø
8"Ø RG-1 RG-1
RG-1 VAV 16 RG-1 VAV 17
RG-1
RG-1 RG-1 T D-2 D-2 D-2 D-2
T T T 140CFM 140CFM 140CFM 140CFM
RG-1 RG-1 10"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø
6"Ø HALL 8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø
300 D-4 D-3 D-2 D1
D-2 16"Ø 16"Ø 14"Ø 12"Ø 10"Ø
C 280CFM 280CFM 280CFM 280CFM VAV 20
C
280CFM
12"Ø 10"Ø 8"Ø 6"Ø
6"Ø
RG-1 12"Ø
D-2 D-2 D-2 D-2 DD
RG-1 T
VAV 13
D-2 FAMILY ELEV LOBBY 140CFM 140CFM 140CFM 140CFM
MENS RG-1 QUIET READING 8"Ø
EG-1 EG-1 280CFM 302 310 8"Ø 8"Ø 8"Ø
303 46"x32" 46"x32" 311
EG-1

ASHRAE 2023-2024
T

C D-1 C

EG-1 EG-1 D-1

EG-1
STORAGE
328 T
ELEV 3
EL3
ELEV 4
EL4
120CFM
8"Ø
DN 22"Ø

VAV 21
D-4
16"Ø 155CFM 14"Ø
D-4
155CFM 12"Ø
D-3
155CFM 10"Ø
D-2
155CFM 8"Ø
D-2
155CFM 6"Ø
D-1
155CFM STUDENT DESIGN
VAV 12

UNDER CUT
DOOR 1"
UNDER CUT
D-2
70CFM
6"Ø
RG-1
6"Ø
VAV 10
STAIR 4
ST4-3
RG-1 RG-1
COMPETITION
D-1 DOOR 1"

50CFMT D-2
50CFM 10"Ø VAV 810"Ø T
TELECOM D-1 6"Ø
ELEC
8"Ø 120CFM
HALL 327 D-1
316
6"Ø VAV 11 6"Ø 50CFM 10"Ø
6"Ø 326A 40CFM

AA T
D-1
T
8"Ø
D-2 46"x36"
6"Ø
RG-1
T

46"x32"
D-4
155CFM 14"Ø
D-4
155CFM 12"Ø
D-3
155CFM 10"Ø
D-2
155CFM 8"Ø
D-2
155CFM
6"Ø
D-1
155CFM PUBLIC LIBRARY
50CFM
RG-1 RG-150CFM 14" Ø
D-1 D-1 STAIR 5
WELLNESS
50CFM 6"Ø WELLNESS
VAV 7 50CFM
CORRIDOR STORAGE
VAV 9 12"Ø 18"Ø ST5-3
326 325 D-3 6"Ø 12"Ø
6"Ø VAV 6 6"Ø 321 321A T 14"Ø
T 120CFM
8"Ø 6"Ø 12"Ø
C.8 6"Ø
VAV 22 RG-1 VAV 23 C.8
SAN PAULO, BRAZIL
VAV 24
ROOF RG-1 D-1
T ELEC T RG-1
D-2 120CFMSTORAGE 6"Ø 313
CORRIDOR T
14"Ø
D 255CFM
8"Ø
T
48"x36"
317
D-1 315
D-4
RG-1 D
54"x40"
UP TO 120CFM
D-1 ROOF 10"Ø 250CFM 6"Ø
50CFM D-3 D-1
D.1 ZOOM
30"x22" RETURN GRILL 120CFM 50CFM 8"Ø
D.1
MEETING 12"Ø
323D RETURN GRILL FROM PLENUM
STORAGE
STORAGED-2
FROM PLENUM TO CHASE 30X30
VAV 4 324 TO CHASE 30X30
314
8"Ø 6"Ø 12"Ø 312 300CFM
D-2 D-1 D-3
50CFM

MATCHLINE - A
MATCHLINE - B
255CFM 250CFM 6"Ø
ZOOM
8"Ø 323C Project Manager
VAV 5
8"Ø D-2
D-2 Project Designer
T 300CFM
170CFM 8"Ø
D-1
ZOOM EF-1 UP TO
CC Project Architect
8"Ø 50CFM
323B ROOF Landscape Architect
6"Ø 8"Ø
D.6 12"Ø D.6 Civil Engineer
VAV 3 D-2
MEETING
120CFM
Structural Engineer
322 ZOOM
D-1323A Mechanical Engineer
D.8 8"Ø 50CFM D.8 Electrical Engineer
D-2 T
Plumbing Engineer
170CFM RG-1
D-2 Interior Designer
E 235CFM
ELEV 2
E
EL2

18"Ø
D-2
B D-2 235CFM STAIR 3 B Sheet Reviewer
12"Ø ST3-3
235CFM
E.3 8"Ø D-2
14"Ø 235CFM D-2 T
D-2
E.3
215CFM RG-1 215CFM
8"Ø 8"Ø
12"Ø BREAK16"Ø 16"Ø
EG-1 ROOM SEATING
320A VAV 2 320
12"Ø
14"Ø VAV 1
8"Ø
E.6 8"Ø E.6
D-2 D-2 12"Ø
235CFM 235CFM
RG-1 D-2
8"Ø
T
D-2 215CFM
E.9 215CFM 8"Ø E.9

F F

F.7 F.7

G G

Y
N

AR
H.1 H.1 TIO
UC

IN
R
ST

IM
O N
C

EL
R
FO

PR
T
NO

A A
Sheet Name

1 1.6 2 2.3 EE 3 4 5 5.7 6 7 8 8.4 DD 9 9.7

HVAC FLOOR PLAN -

LEVEL 3 - OVERALL
1 HVAC FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 3 - OVERALL
M-103 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
Sheet Number

NORTH

0 4' 8' 16'

M-103
5 4 3 2 1
37
38
39
40