0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Nature of Propositional Logic

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Nature of Propositional Logic

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Nature of Propositional Logic

Tautology-

• A compound proposition is called tautology if and only if it is true for all possible
truth values of its propositional variables.
• It contains only T (Truth) in last column of its truth table.

Contradiction-

• A compound proposition is called contradiction if and only if it is false for all


possible truth values of its propositional variables.
• It contains only F (False) in last column of its truth table.

Contingency-

• A compound proposition is called contingency if and only if it is neither a


tautology nor a contradiction.
• It contains both T (True) and F (False) in last column of its truth table.

Valid-

• A compound proposition is called valid if and only if it is a tautology.


• It contains only T (Truth) in last column of its truth table.

Invalid-

• A compound proposition is called invalid if and only if it is not a tautology.


• It contains either only F (False) or both T (Truth) and F (False) in last column of
its truth table.

Falsifiable-
• A compound proposition is called falsifiable if and only if it can be made false for
some value of its propositional variables.
• It contains either only F (False) or both T (Truth) and F (False) in last column of
its truth table.

Unfalsifiable-

• A compound proposition is called unfalsifiable if and only if it can never be made


false for any value of its propositional variables.
• It contains only T (Truth) in last column of its truth table.

Satisfiable-
• A compound proposition is called satisfiable if and only if it can be made true for
some value of its propositional variables.
• It contains either only T (Truth) or both T (True) and F (False) in last column of its
truth table.

Unsatisfiable-

• A compound proposition is called unsatisfiable if and only if it can not be made


true for any value of its propositional variables.
• It contains only F (False) in last column of its truth table.

Important Points-

It is important to take a note of the the following points-


• All contradictions are invalid and falsifiable but not vice-versa.
• All contingencies are invalid and falsifiable but not vice-versa.
• All tautologies are valid and unfalsifiable and vice-versa.
• All tautologies are satisfiable but not vice-versa.
• All contingencies are satisfiable but not vice-versa.
• All contradictions are unsatisfiable and vice-versa.
PRACTICE PROBLEMS BASED ON DETERMINING NATURE OF
PROPOSITIONS-

Problem-01:
Determine the nature of following propositions-
1. p ∧ ∼p
2. (p ∧ (p → q)) → ∼q
3. [ (p → q) ∧ (q → r) ] ∧ ( p ∧ ∼r)
4. ∼(p → q) ∨ (∼p ∨ (p ∧ q))
5. (p ↔ r) → (∼q → (p ∧ r))

Solution-

Let us solve all the parts one by one-

Part-01:
Method-01: Using Truth Table-
p ∼p p ∧ ∼p

F T F

T F F

Clearly, last column of the truth table contains only F.


Therefore, given proposition is-
• Contradiction
• Invalid
• Falsifiable
• Unsatisfiable

Part-02:

Method-01: Using Truth Table-

p q p→q p ∧ (p → q) ∼q (p ∧ (p → q)) →∼q

F F T F T T

F T T F F T

T F F F T T

T T T T F F

Clearly, last column of the truth table contains both T and F.


Therefore, given proposition is-
• Contingency
• Invalid
• Falsifiable
• Satisfiable

Part-03:

Method-01: Using Truth Table-

Let [ (p → q) ∧ (q → r) ] ∧ ( p ∧ ∼r) = R (say)

p q r p→q q→r (p → q) ∧ (q → r) p ∧ ∼r R

F F F T T T F F

F F T T T T F F

F T F T F F F F

F T T T T T F F

T F F F T F T F

T F T F T F F F

T T F T F F T F

T T T T T T F F

Clearly, last column of the truth table contains only F.


Therefore, given proposition is-
• Contradiction
• Invalid
• Falsifiable
• Unsatisfiable

Part-04:
Method-01: Using Truth Table-

Let ∼(p → q) ∨ (∼p ∨ (p ∧ q)) = R (say)

p q ∼p p→q ∼(p → q) p∧q ∼p ∨ (p ∧ q) R

F F T T F F T T

F T T T F F T T

T F F F T F F T

T T F T F T T T

Clearly, last column of the truth table contains only T.


Therefore, given proposition is-
• Tautology
• Valid
• Unfalsifiable
• Satisfiable

Part-05:

Method-01: Using Truth Table-

Let (p ↔ r) → (∼q → (p ∧ r)) = R (say)

p q r ∼q p→r r→p p↔r p∧r ∼q → (p ∧ r) R


F F F T T T T F F F

F F T T T F F F F T

F T F F T T T F T T

F T T F T F F F T T

T F F T F T F F F T

T F T T T T T T T T

T T F F F T F F T T

T T T F T T T T T T

Clearly, last column of the truth table contains both T and F.


Therefore, given proposition is-
• Contingency
• Invalid
• Falsifiable
• Satisfiable

You might also like