Exploring Satire and Social Commentary in Robinson Crusoe and Gulliver's TR - 20240612 - 220419 - 0000
Exploring Satire and Social Commentary in Robinson Crusoe and Gulliver's TR - 20240612 - 220419 - 0000
Satire and social commentary have long been powerful tools used by authors to criticize the
way things are in society, politics, and human behavior. Daniel Defoe's "Robinson Crusoe" and
Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" are two important works from the early 18th century
that exhibit this effectively. Though these books are often seen as thrilling adventures, a
closer examination uncovers their clever use of satire to shed light on the flaws and
absurdities of the society they portray.
In Lilliput, Swift mocks the silly political issues and widespread corruption that exist in
society. The ridiculous arguments of the Lilliputians, such as their disagreements over how to
crack eggs, can be compared to the heated religious and political debates in Britain,
especially the divide between Protestants and Catholics. By exaggerating these disputes,
Swift reveals the irrationality and unimportance of political disagreements.
Brobdingnag, with its gigantic people, acts as a reflection of human flaws. Gulliver's depiction
of the Brobdingnagian king's disgust towards European society highlights the decline in
morals among Europeans and the negative impact of imperialism. Swift uses this perspective
to shed light on the moral challenges of colonialism and the ethical dilemmas it presents.
In Laputa, Swift highlights the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical
wisdom. The Laputans' focus on abstract studies over practicality which illustrated
the aristocratic fascination with impractical scientific pursuits . This comedic piece
stresses the significance of combining intellectual inquisitiveness with practical
use and ethical thinking
In Gulliver's last journey, the Houyhnhnms and Yahoos take center stage, throwing
shade on both reason and human nature. The striking divergence between these
two groups represents the boundaries of reason and morality when it comes to
crafting a utopian society.
In "Robinson Crusoe" , Daniel Defoe shows different traits like being a journalist and a
propagandist. He talks about society during colonial times and how self-interest can harm
both the society and the individual. Defoe uses the character Robinson Crusoe to represent
English colonialism, but he also criticizes it from a puritan perspective. He uses real events
from his time to make the story seem real and to show how people quickly forget about the
consequences of their actions.
To sum up, In the novel "Robinson Crusoe" , Defoe explores the themes of colonialism,
capitalism, and individualism through his social commentary. He skillfully uses satire to
subtly criticize the sense of European superiority and ambition. On the other hand, Jonathan
Swift takes a more direct approach in his work "Gulliver's Travels". He uses overt satire to
critique human nature, politics, and the misguided ideas of the Enlightenment period. While
Defoe's book focuses on the personal and societal growth of Crusoe through his adventures,
Swift's narrative employs fantastical voyages to boldly mock societal norms, corruption, and
the ridiculousness of human institutions. Swift's critique of contemporary society is more
sharp and direct in comparison.