Edited - IMMI Refusal Notification With Decision Record
Edited - IMMI Refusal Notification With Decision Record
Navankur CHAUDHARY
B-3/6 ONKAR DHAM ROAD
OPP. YUVA SHAKTI PUBLIC SCHOOL RAMAVIHAR
DELHI DELHI 110081
INDIA
In reply quote:
Client Name Navankur CHAUDHARY
Date of Birth 13 October 1996
Date of Visa Application 06 October 2018
Application ID 840618316
Transaction Reference Number EGOJQTKM3Q
File Number BCC2018/4346507
Visa Application Charge Receipt Number 9010446004
Notification of refusal of application for a Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600) visa
Refused Applicant
I wish to advise you that the application for this visa has been refused on 24 October 2018
for the following applicant:
The applicant did not satisfy the provisions of the Migration Regulations 1994.
The attached decision record provides detailed information about this decision as it applies to
this applicant.
Review rights
There is no right of merits review for this decision.
As this letter was sent to you by email, you are taken to have received it at the end of the day
it was transmitted.
Yours sincerely
Rashi
Position Number: 60059204
Department of Home Affairs
Application details
Visa class Visitor (class FA) Visitor (Tourist) (subclass
600)
Stream (main applicant only) Tourist
Date of visa application 06 October 2018
Transaction reference number (TRN) EGOJQTKM3Q
Application ID 840618316
File number BCC2018/4346507
Visa application charge receipt number 9010446004
Findings
On the basis of all the information available to me, including the documents and information
the applicant provided, I find that the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the
Tourist stream are not satisfied.
Reasons
I have assessed the application and the reasons for my decision are detailed below.
An application for a Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream has been made by the
applicant.
A visa cannot be granted unless the relevant criteria specified in the Migration Act and the
Migration Regulations are satisfied.
In this case, I am not satisfied that clause 600.211 in Schedule 2 of the Migration
Regulations is satisfied. This clause provides that:
600.211
The applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is
granted, having regard to:
(a) whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last
substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; and
(b) whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600
visa would be subject; and
(c) any other relevant matter.
Current Australian Government policy, specifically PAM3: GenGuide H, Visitor visas, Visa
application related procedures, provides guidance to visa decision makers in assessing
whether or not an applicant meets regulation 600.211, the genuine temporary stay
requirement.
Under policy, in establishing whether 600.211 (c) is satisfied, it is relevant to consider an
applicant’s personal circumstances. An applicant’s economic and employment circumstances
in their home country need to constitute strong incentives for the applicant to return to their
home country at the end of the proposed visit, in order to satisfy the genuine temporary stay
requirement.
In assessing these criteria I have taken into account the information provided in your visa
application form, as well as supporting documents relating to your personal and financial
circumstances in your home country.
You stated in your application that you intend to travel to Australia as a visitor.
You have provided bank statements as evidence of your financial capacity. I have given
limited weight to these documents as evidence of your financial standing, as on its own
and without evidence of the source of your funds it does not demonstrate strong financial
incentive to return after your visit to Australia.
I find that you have not demonstrated sufficiently strong financial, personal, employment or
other commitments in your home country that would be an incentive for you to return after
your visit.
I am not satisfied that you genuinely intend to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose
you have stated, and therefore find that you do not satisfy Subclause 600.211 of the
Migration Regulations 1994.
Therefore, I am not satisfied that the applicant meets the relevant criteria in clause 600.211
in Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations.
Decision
As clause 600.211 is not satisfied, I find the criteria for the grant of a Visitor (Tourist) visa in
the Tourist stream are not satisfied. Therefore, I refuse the application by the applicant for a
Visitor (Tourist) visa in the Tourist stream.
Yours sincerely
Rashi
Position Number: 60059204
Department of Home Affairs
24 October 2018