Influence of Switching Operations On The Vacuum Interrupter Dielectric Strength
Influence of Switching Operations On The Vacuum Interrupter Dielectric Strength
D.C. percentage XI 50 30 30
92 WM 2 3 5 - 2 PWRD A paper recommended and approved Rated short-circuit
by the IEEE Switchgear Committee of the IEEE Power closing current [kAl 50 50 50
Engineering Society for presentation at the IEEE/PES
1992 Winter Meeting, New York, New York, January 26- stroke [mml 8 8 8
Contact
30, 1992. Manuscript submitted May 20, 1991; made
available for printing January 1 3 , 1992. Average opening
speed [Wsl
Table I: Rated data for vacuum interrupters tested
0885-8977/92/$3.0001993 IEEE
176
A pneumatic cylinder was used as a drive for a The voltage impulse was generated due to inter-contact
movable contact of the vacuum interrupter, so that the gap breakdown.
required opening speed was adjusted efficiently. The
opening time scattering of the pneumatic drive was
less than 1.2 m s . In order to avoid outside flashovers VND RI~P
the tested interrupter was placed in a vessel filled
with SF6 (at 2 bar pressure).
[e]
UL(t)
by the Powell's non-derivative approach. Testing of
the measured data compliance to the proposed
statistical model is accomplished by the chi-square
test or Kolmogoroff test. Besides that, measured data
can be presented in the form of probability paper
plots for usual distribution functions.
8o t
P
40 F
2$: I I , I I r4
d lmm3
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Fig.8:A.C. breakdown voltages on Weibull probability
scale, for type A interrupter with conditioned
contacts (d=4mm).
Fig.6: 50% voltage value V-4 versus inter-electrode
gap for type A interrupter(* - V-4 measurements It has not been identified a significant
during dielectric tests by impulse voltage, o V-4 - difference in dielectric properties between type A,
measurements during dielectric tests by A.C. voltage). type B, and type C interrupters for conditioned
contacts.
I
Fig. 10:A. C. breakdown voltages on Weibull probability
scale, after the switching operation "closing without
current/breaking with rated current'' for type A
interrupter, (d=4mm).
.-
switching operation belong to the Weibull
distribution, Fig. 10. Also, it was found that the
time
"closing without current/breaking with rated current''
applied switching operation did not significantly
affect the dielectric strength. The emission Fig.1l:Temporal change of arc voltage 3 and arc
characteristic V 4 measurement and estimation the current i, during the switching operation "closing
shape parameter of the Weibull's distribution (6=7.15 without currenthreaking with rated current'' for type
for type A interrupter, 6=6.62 for type B interrupter A interrupter.
and 6=6.98 for type C interrupter) are indicating that
vacuum breakdown, after the switching operation Dielectric properties of vacuum interrupters after
"closing without current/breaking with rated current" switching operation "closing without current/breaking
is occurring by the emission mechanism. This can be of rated short-circuit current"
explained by the occurrence of a diffuse electric arc
during this switching operation. The diffuse electric Also, it has been established that experimentally
arc moves along the interrupter contacts and melts the obtained values of breakdown voltages, upon the
micro tips, formed by breaking of the welded contacts. "closing without currenthreaking of rated
In such a way. a diffuse arc performs the conditioning short-circuit current" applied switching operation,
of contacts. The presumption of the diffuse electric belong to the Weibull distribution, Fig.12. After this
arc occurrence is confirmed by Fig. 11. This figure is switching operation the dielectric. strength of
illustrating a scope trace of the "closing without interrupter is reduced. Namely, the switching
current/breaking with rated current" switching operation "closing without currenthreaking of rated
operation. The scope trace from Fig. 11 is a typical short-circuit current'' affects the dielectric strength
one for the diffuse arc occurrence. On the basis of of type B interrupters in greater extent than of type
the obtained results it can be stated that the A interrupters. The emission characteristics V-4
mechanism initiating the breakdown after switching measurement could not be performed because the
operation "closing without current/breaking with rated bryikdown occurred before emission current reached a
current" is one of the emission type. 10 A value. By estimating the parameters of the shape
of Weibull distribution (6=2.32 for type A interrupter
Significant difference in influence of this , 6=4.11 for type B interrupter and 8=3.12 for type C
switching operation on dielectric properties of type interrupter) one obtains the values significantly
A, type B and type C interrupters has not been .differing from the ones obtained for the case of
observed. interrupter with conditioned contacts.
180
lower observed value of breakdown voltage after
switching operation "closing without current/breaking
of rated short-circuit current'' for type C interrupter
(axial field) in comparison with type A and B
interrupters (transversal field) can be explained by
higher generation of micro particles in the case of
interrupter with axial field. In other words, for
interrupters with transverse magnetic field micro
particles were created mainly by melting in anode
1I spot, while for interrupters with axial magnetic field
besides formation in cathode spots they were created
also by bridge explosion during contact parting.
1'
type A interrupter, (d=4mm).
200 -
According to this data, it can be concluded that
vacuum breakdown, upon the switching operation
"closing without current/breaking of rated
short-circuit current'' is not initiated by the 160 -
emission mechanism. The high vacuum in the interrupter
does not allow the avalanche breakdown mechanism [31,
meaning that the vacuum breakdown after switching
operation "closing without current/breaking of rated 120 -
short-circuit current'' is initiated by the
micro-particles mechanism. The micro-particles occur
after melting of the contact material due to a 80 -
narrowed arcing effect. The presumption of narrowed
arc occurrence is confirmed to be correct, as shown in
F i g . 1 3 . F i g . 1 3 presents the scope trace of the
switching operation "closing without current/breaking 40 -
of rated short-circuit current". This trace
illustrates the characteristic rise rate of voltage
during the electric arc transition into a narrowed
shape [SI. A different influence of the switching 0
(1) (2) ( 31 (4)
operation "closing without current/breaking of rated
short-circuit current" on the dielectric properties of Fig.14:The SO % breakdown A.C. voltage for : 1
type A and type B interrupters can be explained by a -conditioned contacts, 2 - contacts after the
different composition of contact material [ 1 0 , 1 1 1 . The switching operation "closing without current/breaking
without current", 3 - contacts after the switching
operation "closing without current/breaking with rated
current", 4 - contacts after the switching operation
"closing without current/breaking of rqted
short-circuit current", (d=8mm,0 -type A interrupter,
-type B interrupter,* -type C interrupter).
CONCLUSION
--
current" ,as well as "closing without current/breaking
of rated short-circuit current", significantly reduce
the dielectric strength of the interrupters. The
switching operation "closing without current/breaking
with rated current'' does not cause the change in
-
I
dielectric strength of vacuum interrupters. This can
be explained by the conditioning of contacts during
time this switching operation, due to the diffuse electric
arc.
Fig.13:Temporal change of arc voltage U and arc
current i, during the switching operatiok "closing For the "breakdown voltage" random variable, after
without current/breaking with short circuit current'' all considered switching operations, it w a s found that
for type A interrupter. it belongs to Weibull distribution. At the same time,
the Weibull distribution with constant parameter shape
181
was obtained approximately for all cases except for [61 Frochlich K., Widl W..Breakdown and field-emission
the case of switching operation "closing without Behavior of Differently Prestressed Vacuum Interrupter
current/breaking of rated short-circuit current". It Copper Contacts TEE Proc. pt E, ~01.128, No 4. pp
can be concluded that this is the consequence of the 143-249, 1981.
same weak insulator points in all cases i.e.micro tips
on cathodes. [71 Verordnunx -U den Schutz v s Schaden durch
Rontnenstralen, Bundesgesetzblatt, March 9, 1973.
By measuring the emission current for conditioned
contacts and contacts after switching operat ion [81 Dogo G., OsmokroviC P.,Statistical Properties of
"closing without current/breaking without current", Electrical Breakdown in Vacuum, IEEE Trans.
and "closing without current/breaking of rated Electrical Insulation, Vol 24, No 6, pp 949, 1989.
current", the existence of correlation between average
breakdown voltage and V-4 voltage has been found. On [91 OsmokroviC P., Influence of Switching Operations
the contrary, for contacts after switching operation on the Reversibility of the Vacuum Interrupter
"closing without current/breaking of rated Dielectrical Properties 14th ISDEIV, paper 4P18, Santa
short-circuit current", it has been found that there Fe 1990.
is no correlation between average breakdown voltage
and V-4 voltage. It can be concluded that the [ l o ] Osmokrovic. P., The Irreversibility of Dielectric
breakdown for conditioned contacts, contacts after Strength of Vacuum Interrupters After Short-circuit
switching operation "closing without current/breaking Current Interruption, IEEEIPES SM, 372-3, 1990.
without current", and contacts after switching
operation "closing without current/breaking of rated [111. Widl W., SDannungsfestinkeit van Vakuumschaltern
current", is initiated by the emission mechanism. nach verschiedenen Schalthaudlungen, Ph.D. Disertation
However, after the switching operat ion "closing Teh. Univ. Vienna 1980.
without currentlbreaking of rated short-circuit
current", the breakdown is initiated by the micro
particles mechanism. Any influence of the type of Born in Sarajevo (Yugoslavia). on
interrupter on the change of dielectric strength after August 20,1949. Completed high school
switching operations "closing without current/breaking education in Sarajevo and graduated
of rated current" and "closing without Electrical Engineering at the
current/breaking without current" has not University of Belgrade (Yugoslavia).
beenobserved. It was concluded that the contact Completed post-graduate studies and
material composition and magnetic field type did not got his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees at the
influence degradation of dielectric by these switching University of Belgrade. Spent a number
operations. Higher degradation of dielectric strength of years in Karlsruhe (West Germany),
by the switching operation "closing without working on various professional projects as a
current/breaking of rated short-circuit current" for scientific research collaborator of the H.V. Institute
the type B interrupter in comparison with the type A of the University of Karlsruhe.Permanent1y employed as
interrupter was explained by different composition of associate professor at the Faculty of Electrical
contact material. Higher degradation of dielectric Engineering University of Belgrade (Yugoslavia) and
strength after switching operation "closing without engaged as scientific research collaborator at the
current/breaking of rated short-circuit current" was IRCE Institute of "Energoinsvet" Company of Sarajevo,
explained by increasing generation of micro particles (Yugoslavia).
for the interrupter with axial magnetic field. This is
the consequence of the fact that for interrupters with
transverse magnetic field micro particles were created
mainly by melting in anode spot. On the other side for
interrupter's with axial magnetic field, besides
formation in cathode spots, micro particles were
created also by bridge explosion during contact
parting. It should be pointed out that the considered
switching operations did not degrade dielectric
strength of vacuum interrupters below rated values.
REFERENCES
[11 Farral G. A., Recovery of Dielectric Strength
After Currants Interruption in Vacuum, IEEE Trans. on
Plasma Science, vol. PS-6, No. 4, pp 360-369, 1978.