0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lecture 8 4

r jyj

Uploaded by

ukradlimipsa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Lecture 8 4

r jyj

Uploaded by

ukradlimipsa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

1/25

Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables


Function of several variables

Mariusz Górajski
Depratment of Econometrics, University of Lódź

April, 2016

2/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
1 Comparative statics: Envelope theorem

2 Marginal functions and Partial elasticities

3 Optimization with constraints

3/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics

4/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics

A simple economic model can be described by

f (p, y ) = 0

where f is a function describing model, y is endogenous variable


(equilibrium), and p is a model parameter or exogenous variable.
We would like to know how the equilibrium value of y depends on
the parameter p, hence we assume that y = y (p). For example,
does it increase or decrease when the value of the parameter
increases?
Using the Implicit Function Theorem we obtain:

fp (p, y )
y 0 (p) = −
fy (p, y )

5/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics. Envelope theorem.
A simple optimization problem in economics can be described by

max f (x, p) (P)


x∈D

Assume that x ∗ = x ∗ (p) is the solution to (P) and


f ∗ (p) = f (x ∗ (p), p) be the value of f at x ∗ . f ∗ is the value
function for (P).
Applying the chain rule to f ∗ we obtain:
df ∗ 0
(p) = fx0 (x ∗ (p), p)x ∗ (r ) + fp0 (x ∗ (p), p).
dp

Notice that if x ∗ (p) is an interior point of D and f is differentiable


then, fx0 (x ∗ (p), p) = 0 by the Fermat theorem. Finally,

df ∗
(p) = fp0 (x ∗ (p), p). (E)
dp
6/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics. Envelope theorem.

Theorem (Envelope Theorem)


Let f (x, p) be a continuously differentiable function of n + m
variables. Define the value function f ∗ of m variables by

f ∗ (p) = max f (x, p),


x∈D

where x ∈ Rn and p ∈ Rm . If f ∗ is continuously differentiable then


0
fp∗j (p) = fp0j (x ∗ (p), p) (E)

for j = 1, ..., k.

7/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics. Envelope theorem. Example I

Example
Suppose a firm sells x units of commodity and receive revenue
R(x) = px, where p > 0 is price. The total cost function
C (x) = x 2 . Then the profit is

Π(x, p) = R(x) − C (x) = px − x 2 .

Find the optimal amounts of commodity x ∗ (p) ie. solve:

max Π(x, p) = Π∗ (p) = Π(x ∗ (p), p)


x≥0

and then determine how much profit is change if the price


increases by 1 unit from p = 4. Notice that

p p2 0 p
x ∗ (p) = Π∗ (p) = Π∗ (p) =
2 4 2
8/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Comparative statics. Envelope theorem. Example I

Example
Using (E) we obtain the same result more simply:
0 p 0
Π∗ (p) = Π0p (x ∗ (p), p) = x ∗ (p) = Π∗ (4) = 2
2

9/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Marginal functions and partial elasticities

10/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Marginal products

Example
Consider the production function Y = F (K , L, T ), where Y is the
quantity of output, and K , L, S are the quantities of factor inputs
(capital, labour, land). Then

∂F ∂F ∂F
, ,
∂K ∂L ∂T
are called marginal products of capital, of labour and of land,
respectively.

11/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Partial elasticities

Definition
A partial elasticity of f : D → R at point (x0 , y0 ) ∈ D with
respect to x is defined by
x0
Ex f (x0 , y0 ) = fx0 (x0 , y0 ) .
f (x0 , y0 )

Ex f (x0 , y0 ) is equal to the percentage change in z = f (x, y ) from


z0 = f (x0 , y0 ) caused by 1% increase in independent variable x
from x0 , when y is held constant.

12/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Partial elasticities

Definition
A partial elasticity of f : D → R at point (x0 , y0 ) ∈ D with
respect to y is defined by
y0
Ey f (x0 , y0 ) = fy0 (x0 , y0 ) .
f (x0 , y0 )

Ey f (x0 , y0 ) is equal to the percentage change in z = f (x, y ) from


z0 = f (x0 , y0 ) caused by 1% increase in independent variable y
from y0 , when x is held constant.

The partial elasticities of the Cobb-Douglas function:


f (x, y ) = Ax a y b are constant and given by
Ex f (x, y ) = a, Ey f (x, y ) = b.

13/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Marginal rate of substitution

In economics it is crucial to know the slope of the tangent line to a


level curve at some point.
Definition
Let z = f (x, y ) be a function of two variables. Fix a level curve
f (x, y ) = c and let y 0 be the derivative of implicit function at
(x0 , y0 ) (f (x0 , y0 ) = c). The marginal rate of substitution
MRSyx (x0 , y0 ) of y for x measures the quantity of y we must add
per unit of x removed, if the value of f is constant at c ie.

fx0 (x0 , y0 )
MRSyx (x0 , y0 ) = −y 0 = .
fy0 (x0 , y0 )

14/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Elastistity of substitution
Definition
Let z = f (x, y ) be a function of two variables. Fix a level curve
f (x, y ) = c and let y 0 be the derivative of implicit function at
(x0 , y0 ) defined by f (x, y ) = c. The elasticity of substitution ESyx
between y and x is
y
ESyx = EMRSyx ( ).
x
If MRSyx increases by 1 %, then approximately the relative
allocation yx increases/decreases by ESyx %1 .
Example
MRS and ES for the Cobb-Douglas function f (x, y ) = Ax a y b are
given by:
by y a
MRSyx = , = MRSyx , ESyx = 1
ax x b
1
the larger the magnitude of the elasticity of substitution means the more
likely to substitute. 15/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Optimization with constraints

16/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Optimization problem with equality constraint
Consider a problem of maximizing or minimizing an objective
function z = f (x, y ) when x, y are restricted to satisfy an
equality constraint g (x, y ) = c.
max f (x, y ) subject to g (x, y ) = c (*)
min f (x, y ) subject to g (x, y ) = c

17/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Optimization problem with equality constraint- example

Example (utility maximization problem)


A consumer decides about the amount of the consumption two
goods x, y using own utility function f (x, y ) = xy . She has the
budget constraint: 2x + 1y = 100, where 2 and 1 are the prices of
goods, respectively, and 100 is the consumer income. Find the only
solution to the utility maximization problem:

max xy subject to 2x + 1y = 100 (1)

18/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
The Lagrange multiplier method

We define the Lagrangian L by

L(x, y ) = f (x, y ) − λ(g (x, y ) − c), (2)

where λ ∈ R is a Lagrange multiplier.


Theorem (Lagrange’s theorem: necessary condition for (*))
Consider problem (*). Assume that f and f have continuous
partial derivatives in a domain D and that (x0 , y0 ) ∈ int(D) is a
local extreme point for f subject to g (x, y ) = c (ie. a solution to
(*)). Suppose further that gx0 (x0 , y0 ), gy0 (x0 , y0 ) are not both 0.
Then there exists a unique number λ0 such that the Lagrangian L
has stationary point at (x0 , y0 ) i.e. we have

L0x (x0 , y0 ) = 0, L0y (x0 , y0 ) = 0, g (x0 , y0 ) = c. (3)

19/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
The Lagrange multiplier method: sufficient conditions

Theorem (sufficient condition for (*))


Consider problem (*). Assume that (x0 , y0 ) is a stationary point
for the Lagrangian L and satisfies the constraint g (x0 , y0 ) = c.
Moreover,
if the Lagrangian L is concave, then (x0 , y0 ) is the global
maximum point for f subject to g (x, y ) = c.
if the Lagrangian L is convex, then (x0 , y0 ) is the global
minimum point for f subject to g (x, y ) = c.

20/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
The Lagrange multiplier method: sufficient conditions

Theorem (local second order sufficient conditions)


Consider problem (*). Assume that (x0 , y0 ) is a stationary point
for the Lagrangian L and satisfies the constraint g (x0 , y0 ) = c.
Define a border Hessian by

gx0 (x, y ) gy0 (x, y )


 
0
HL(λ, x, y ) = det  gx0 (x, y ) L00xx (x, y ) L00xy (x, y )  .
gy0 (x, y ) L00yx (x, y ) L00yy (x, y )

Then,
if HL(λ∗ , x ∗ , y ∗ ) > 0, then (x0 , y0 ) is a local maximum point
for f subject to g (x, y ) = c.
if HL(λ∗ , x ∗ , y ∗ ) < 0,, then (x0 , y0 ) is a local minimum point
for f subject to g (x, y ) = c.

21/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
The Lagrange multiplier method: example I

Consider the problem:

max xy subject to 2x + y = 100 (4)

We set f (x, y ) = xy and g (x, y ) = 2x + 1. Define the Lagrangian:


L(x, y ) = xy − λ(2x + y − 100). Then, we have L0x (x, y ) = y − 2λ,
L0y (x, y ) = x − λ and hence the necessary conditions:

 y − 2λ = 0
x −λ=0 (5)
2x + y = 100

We obtain a stationary point (x ∗ , y ∗ ) = (25, 50) of L with λ∗ = 25.


Now we examine the sufficient condition for the solution. Notice
that: L00xx (x, y ) = L00yy (x, y ) = 0 and L00xy (x, y ) = L00xy (x, y ) = 1,

22/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
The Lagrange multiplier method: example II

gx0 (x, y ) = 2, gy0 (x, y ) = 1. Hence the border Hessian HL takes


the form:
 
0 2 1
HL(λ, x, y ) = det  2 0 1  = 4 > 0.
1 1 0

Therefore (x ∗ , y ∗ ) = (25, 50) is a local maximum point for


f (x, y ) = xy st 2x + y = 100.

23/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Interpreting λ: shadow price of resource I

max f (x, y ) subject to g (x, y ) = c (*)

Let x ∗ = x ∗ (c) and y ∗ = y ∗ (c) be the solution to (*) and


λ = λ(c) is an associated Lagrange multiplier.
The value of f at (x ∗ , y ∗ ) also depends on c:

f ∗ (c) = f (x ∗ (c), y ∗ (c))

and it is called the value function for the problem (*).


Theorem
Assume that f ∗ is differentiable in a neighbourhood of c. Then,
df ∗
(c) = λ(c)
dc
24/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables
Interpreting λ: shadow price of resource II
Remark
In economics, c often denotes the available stock of some resource,
g (x, y ) represents the amount of resources used, f (x, y ) denotes
utility or profit. Then, λ(c) is called a shadow price of resource,
since it is approximately equal to change in profit or utility if one
unit of resource c is made available.

Consider the problem:

max xy subject to 2x + y = c. (6)

(x ∗ (c), y ∗ (c)) = ( c4 , c2 ) is the solution, and λ(c) = c4 .


2
Hence the value function is f ∗ (c) = m8 . It follows that
df ∗ m
dc (c) = 4 = λ(c).
λ(100) = 25 is a shadow price of income = the increase in utility
f (x, y ) = xy caused by 1 unit increase in income form c = 100.
25/25
Mariusz Górajski Function of several variables

You might also like