StandardMetods23RD 553 554 SULFUROS
StandardMetods23RD 553 554 SULFUROS
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.096 4
SULFIDE (4500-S2⫺)/Gas Dialysis, Automated Methylene Blue Method
washed crystals of Na2S 䡠 9H2O into a small beaker. Add some- dropwise, to the second tube, until color matches that developed
what less than enough water to cover crystals. Stir occasionally for in first tube. If the concentration exceeds 20 mg/L, repeat test
a few minutes, then pour solution into another vessel. This solution with a portion of sample diluted tenfold.
reacts slowly with oxygen but the change is insignificant if analysis With methylene blue solution I, adjusted so 0.05 mL (1 drop)
is performed within a few hours. Prepare solution daily. To 1 L ⫽ 1.0 mg S2⫺/L when 7.5 mL of sample are used:
distilled water, add 1 drop of Na2S solution and mix. Immediately
determine sulfide concentration by the meth-ylene blue procedure mg S2⫺/L ⫽ no. drops solution I ⫹ 0.1 (no. drops solution II)
and by the iodometric procedure. Repeat, using more than
1 drop Na2S solution or smaller volumes of water, until at 2) Photometric color measurement—A cell with a light path of
least five tests have been made, with a range of sulfide 1 cm is suitable for measuring sulfide concentrations from 0.1 to
concentrations between 1 and 8 mg/L. Calculate average 2.0 mg/L. Use shorter or longer light paths for higher or lower
percent error of the methylene blue result as compared to the concentrations. This method is suitable for sample concentra-
iodometric result. If the average error is negative (i.e., methylene tions up to 20 mg/L. Zero instrument with a portion of treated
blue results are lower than iodometric results), dilute methylene sample from Tube B. Prepare calibration curves on basis of
blue solution by the same percentage, so a greater volume will be colorimetric tests made on Na2S solutions simultaneously ana-
used in matching colors. If methylene blue results are high, increase lyzed by the iodometric method, plotting concentration vs.
solution strength by adding more dye. absorbance. A linear relationship between concentration and
g. Methylene blue solution II: Dilute 10.00 mL of adjusted absorbance can be assumed from 0 to 1.0 mg/L.
methylene blue solution I to 100 mL with reagent water. Read sulfide concentration from calibration curve.
a. Color development: Transfer 7.5 mL sample to each of two In a study by two chemists working in the same laboratory, the
matched test tubes, using a special wide-tip pipet or filling to marks standard deviation estimated from 34 sets of duplicate sulfide
on test tubes. If sample has been preserved with zinc acetate, shake measurements was 0.04 mg/L for concentrations between 0.2
vigorously before taking subsample. Add to Tube A 0.5 mL and 1.5 mg/L. The average recoveries of known additions were
amine-sulfuric acid reagent and 0.15 mL (3 drops) FeCl3 92% for 40 samples containing 0.5 to 1.5 mg/L and 89% for
solution. Mix immediately by inverting slowly, only once. (Excessive samples containing less than 0.1 mg/L.
mixing causes low results by loss of H2S as a gas before it has had
time to react). To Tube B add 0.5 mL 1 ⫹ 1 H2SO4 and 0.15 mL 5. Quality Control
(3 drops) FeCl3 solution and mix. The presence of S2⫺ will be
indicated by the appearance of blue color in Tube A. Color devel- The quality control practices considered to be an integral part
opment usually is complete in about 1 min, but a longer time often of each method are summarized in Table 4020:I.
is required for fading out of the initial pink color. Wait 3 to 5 min
and add 1.6 mL (NH4)2HPO4 solution to each tube. Wait 3 to 15
min and make color comparisons. If zinc acetate was used, wait 6. Bibliography
at least 10 min before making a visual color comparison. POMEROY, R.D. 1936. The determination of sulfides in sewage. Sewage
b. Color determination: Works J. 8:572.
1) Visual color estimation—Add methylene blue solution I or NUSBAUM, I. 1965. Determining sulfides in water and waste water. Water
II, depending on sulfide concentration and desired accuracy, Sewage Works 112:113.
https://doi.org/10.2105/SMWW.2882.096 5