Wholeissue 50 5-1
Wholeissue 50 5-1
May/mai 2024
Crux Mathematicorum is a problem-solving journal at the secondary and university undergraduate levels,
published online by the Canadian Mathematical Society. Its aim is primarily educational; it is not a research
journal. Online submission:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
Crux Mathematicorum est une publication de résolution de problèmes de niveau secondaire et de premier
cycle universitaire publiée par la Société mathématique du Canada. Principalement de nature éducative,
le Crux n’est pas une revue scientifique. Soumission en ligne:
https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/
The Canadian Mathematical Society grants permission to individual readers of this publication to copy articles for
their own personal use.
c CANADIAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2024. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ISSN 1496-4309 (Online)
La Société mathématique du Canada permet aux lecteurs de reproduire des articles de la présente publication à des
fins personnelles uniquement.
Editorial Board
Crux Mathematicorum
Founding Editors / Rédacteurs-fondateurs: Léopold Sauvé & Frederick G.B. Maskell
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: G.W. Sands, R.E. Woodrow, Bruce L.R. Shawyer,
Shawn Godin
Crux Mathematicorum
with Mathematical Mayhem
Former Editors / Anciens Rédacteurs: Bruce L.R. Shawyer, James E. Totten, Václav Linek,
Shawn Godin
218/ Editorial
EDITORIAL
Every year, I write a report on Crux for the Canadian Mathematical Society. I
highlight changes made to the publication (Editorial Board members, new submis-
sion procedures or timelines, formatting), I speak of the additions (new sections
or columns), I mention any special editions and in general I try to give a sense
of impact of the journal. The latter is hard to measure – Crux is an open-access
publication, so I don’t have a number of subscribers to cite or even a number of
downloads to provide. And while I know that the reach of the journal goes well
beyond the number of submissions we get, those are the only hard statistics I can
cite. So just for fun, here are some numbers describing two of the most recent is-
sues, namely Volume 50, issues 1 and 2. The two issues spanned 101 pages, which
included our regular problem sections as well as articles by 5 different authors. For
these two issues (a fifth of the yearly total), we received 402 solutions from solvers
in 25 countries: Austria, Azerbaijan, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Lebanon,
Nicaragua, Peru, Romania, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Spain, Syria, USA, Viet-
nam. So far from the beginning of 2024 to date (I am writing this on May 15th),
we received 127 problem proposals to be considered for publication and we publish
just over 100 authored problems a year.
Of course the number of readers is much higher than the number of those who end
up submitting solutions or proposals. Occasionally, I enjoy Googling the name of
the journal to see where it pops up. On my latest search, in the first two dozens
of links, I came across two websites of problem solving groups that track their
submissions to Crux, five personal websites/blogs mentioning the journal, two
pdf files with selected problems, not to mention the links of various libraries and
online repositories linking to Crux materials. Sometimes, I am gifted a pleasant
surprise of seeing Crux reference in the wild, for example as a reference in a paper
by Terence Tao.
Join our community of active participants: submit your solutions to the problems
of the issue – note that the section Reading a Math Book also has problems from
the chosen resource for you to submit solutions to. You can also submit problem
proposals, all at https://publications.cms.math.ca/cruxbox/. If Crux has
had an impact on you or you see a fun reference to it somewhere, drop me a line
at [email protected].
Kseniya Garaschuk
MATHEMATTIC
No. 55
The problems featured in this section are intended for students at the secondary school
level.
MA273. Let
P (x) = x4 + ax3 + bx2 + cx + d,
where a, b, c and d are constants. If P (1) = 10, P (2) = 20 and P (3) = 30, compute
1
10 (P (12) + P (−8)).
MA274. If
MA275. Scalene triangle ABC is reflected through its own centroid G, the
image being triangle A0 B 0 C 0 . If AB = 2BC and the area of triangle A0 B 0 C 0
is 72, compute the area of the hexagonal region common to both triangle ABC
and triangle A0 B 0 C 0 . (Note: the centroid of a triangle is the intersection of its
medians.)
.................................................................
Les problèmes proposés dans cette section sont appropriés aux étudiants de l’école sec-
ondaire.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 31 juillet 2024.
MA273. Soit
P (x) = x4 + ax3 + bx2 + cx + d,
où a, b, c et d sont des constantes. Si P (1) = 10, P (2) = 20 et P (3) = 30, calculez
1
10 (P (12) + P (−8)).
MA274. Si
MATHEMATTIC
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(10), p. 516–518.
MA246. The length of a rectangular piece of paper is three times its width.
The paper is folded so that one vertex lies on top of the opposite vertex, thus
forming a pentagonal shape. What is the area of the pentagon as a fraction of the
area of the original rectangle?
Originally from the 2023 Senior Mathematical Challenge (organized by the United
Kingdom Mathematics Trust), Question 23.
We received 5 submissions, all of which were correct. We present a solution by the
Missouri State University Problem Solving Group.
More generally, consider a rectangle ABCD with AB = 1 and BC = a ≥ 1. Let
XY be the crease obtained by folding the paper and P its midpoint as shown in
the figure.
Now p 1p 2
BD = a2 + 1 and hence BP = a + 1.
2
Since 4BP X is similar to 4BCD,
√
a2 + 1
PX = .
2a
The area of 4BP X is therefore
a2 + 1
.
8a
The area of the pentagon is twice the area of quadrilateral ABP Y , which is the
area of rectangle ABCD minus twice the area of 4BP X. In other words, the area
of the pentagon is
a2 + 1 3a2 − 1
a− = .
4a 4a
Finally, the ratio of the pentagon’s area to that of the original rectangle is
3a2 − 1
.
4a2
For the original problem, this ratio is 13/18.
MA247. A regular m-gon, a regular n-gon and a regular p-gon share a vertex
and pairwise share edges, as shown in the diagram. What is the largest possible
value of p?
Originally from the 2020 Senior Mathematical Challenge (organized by the United
Kingdom Mathematics Trust), Question 25.
Therefore
1 3
≤ ,
2 m
whence m ≤ 6.
When m = 4, (1) yields (n−4)(p−4) = 16 and the candidate (m, n, p) = (4, 5, 20).
When m = 5, (1) yields (3n − 10)(3p − 10) = 100 and (m, n, p) = (5, 5, 10).
We conclude that the largest possible value of p is 42, when a regular 42-gon meets
an equilateral triangle and a regular heptagon.
Comment from the editor. All of the solutions submitted arrived at the equation
1/m + 1/n + 1/p = 1/2. From then on, it was mainly a matter of trial and error
for most of them.
Originally from the 2022 Senior Mathematical Challenge (organized by the United
Kingdom Mathematics Trust), Question 25.
There were 5 submissions, 4 of which were complete and correct. We present the
solution by Missouri State University Problem Solving Group.
We will solve the problem more generally when
QP = RS = b
and
P R = P S = QR = QS = a.
Let X denote the midpoint of segment P Q and Y the midpoint of segment RS.
Since 4P RX is a right triangle,
…
p b2
RX = P R − P X = a2 − .
2 2
4
Since 4RXY is also a right triangle,
…
p b2
XY = RX 2 − RY =
2 a2 − .
2
The volume of tetrahedron P RSX is Bh/3, where B is the area of 4RSX, i.e.,
…
1 b b2
B = RS · XY = a2 −
2 2 2
and h = b/2. The volume of the carton is twice the volume of tetrahedron P RSX,
so …
b2 b2
a2 − .
6 2
In the original problem, a = 10 and b = 4 giving a volume of
√
16 23
.
3
MA249. Peter has 25 cards, each printed with a different integer from 1
to 25. He wishes to place N cards in a single row so that the numbers on every
adjacent pair of cards have a prime factor in common. What is the largest value
of N for which this is possible?
Originally from the 2015 Senior Mathematical Challenge (organized by the United
Kingdom Mathematics Trust), Question 24.
The problem has been correctly solved in all 6 submissions. We present the solution
by Mahadevan Aravind.
An integer can occur on a card in the row only if it shares a prime factor with at
least one other integer on a card in the row. This rules out 1, which has no prime
factors. It also rules out the primes 13, 17, 19 and 23 which are not factors of any
other integers in the range from 1 to 25. With 1, 13, 17, 19 and 23 excluded, this
leaves at most 20 cards that can be in the row.
It is indeed possible to arrange all these remaining 20 cards in a row so as to meet
the condition that integers on adjacent cards share a prime factor. For example,
one of many possible configurations is
7, 14, 21, 3, 18, 15, 5, 25, 10, 4, 20, 24, 9, 6, 8, 12, 16, 2, 22, 11.
Originally from the 2021 Senior Mathematical Challenge (organized by the United
Kingdom Mathematics Trust), Question 25.
We received 9 solutions, 8 of which were complete and correct. While there were
multiple approaches we will present two of them.
Solution 1, by Yeganeh Heydarizadeh.
We name the points of the diagram as follows for our convenience of solving.
Å ã2 √ Å ã2 √
5 25 2 2 10 2
AF = 52 + = and F C = 22 + = .
7 7 7 7
Thus,
√ √
25 2 10 2 √
AC = + = 5 2.
7 7
By Pythagoras’ theorem,
and so we have AB = 5. It can be seen that the area of the square GHJK is 2,
25
the area of the triangle AGF is 14 , the area of the triangle CEF is 72 , and area of
25
the triangle ADC is 2 . Hence, the shaded area is equal to
25 25 2
Å ã
− 2+ + = 9.
2 14 7
We have
» √
PQ = (2 + 2 + 3)2 + (2 − 1)2 = 5 2,
so the side length of the square is 5. Since the rays emanating from P and Q are
parallel, the shaded angles at each vertex are complementary.
Rotating the shaded region 180◦ around the center of the square (and darkening
the shading) gives the image above. The unshaded region in the center consists of
seven unit squares. The area of the original shaded region is therefore
1 2
5 − 7 = 9.
2
PROBLEM SOLVING
VIGNETTES
No. 32
Shawn Godin
Two Problems from Honsberger
.................................................................
First we note that in order for the points of intersection of the parallel lines to
form a square, the two pairs of parallel lines must be perpendicular to each other.
In particular, the line through A and the line through D are perpendicular. We
will label the point of intersection of these two lines P . Then, as ∠AP D = 90◦ ,
P lies on the circle with diameter AD (see [2019: 45(8), 452-456] if you need a
refresher on some circle properties). Hence if P is any point on the circle with
diameter AD, then the quadrilateral, P QRS, formed by our two pairs of parallel
lines will necessarily be a rectangle.
P
S
Y
Q
X R
A D
B C
In order for P QRS to be a square, we require the distances between the pairs of
parallel lines to be the same, that is, BX = CY , where X and Y are shown in the
diagram above. Note that, by our method of construction, ∆ABX and ∆CDY
are similar right angled triangles. If BX = CY , we could translate and rotate
∆CDY to ∆C 0 D0 Y 0 such that C 0 and Y 0 coincide with B and X, respectively.
This process would create a larger triangle, ∆AD0 B, which is similar to the other
two triangles, as shown below.
D0
P
Y0
X C0
A D
B C
Then where AD0 (possibly extended) meets the circle with diameter AD is the
vertex P of our square. The line through B, parallel to AP ; the line through D
and P ; and the line through C parallel to DP complete the construction of square
P QRS.
• construct the line through B parallel to AE and the line through C parallel
to DP ,
• the other three points of intersection of the pairs of parallel lines are the
other vertices of square P QRS.
Interested readers might try the construction themselves using their favourite dy-
namic geometry software or, possibly, by hand with compass and straightedge
(see [2021: 47(5), 232-237] and [2021: 47(6), 282-286] for a review of geometric
constructions).
.................................................................
We could actually attack this problem with technology. A patient person could
punch this into a calculator and verify – after a few minutes – that the condition
is satisfied. You could also write a program, or use a spreadsheet to deliver the
result much more quickly.
Let’s explore the problem with a spreadsheet. Start by putting 1 in cell A1, 2
in cell B1, and 0.5 in cell C1. Then, in cells A2, B2 and C2, enter the formulas:
= A1 + 2; = B1 + 2; and = C1 ∗ A2/B2, respectively. Upon applying these
formulas, looking at the nth row we would find:
• the numerator of the nth fraction in cell An,
• the denominator of the nth fraction in cell Bn, and
• the product of the first n fractions in cell Cn.
Thus, we could see that the product at hand yields
1 3 5 7 99 1
· · · ··· ≈ 0.0795 · · · <
2 4 6 8 100 10
The nice thing with the spreadsheet is that, we can back up and see that
1 3 5 7 61 1
· · · ··· ≈ 0.1009 · · · >
2 4 6 8 62 10
while
1 3 5 7 61 63 1
· · · ··· · ≈ 0.0993 · · · < .
2 4 6 8 62 64 10
So the conditions for the inequality were satisfied quite some time before the end
of our product. This leads us to believe that the inequality can be strengthened.
For example, using the numbers from the spreadsheet we see that
1 1 3 5 7 99 1
< · · · ··· < .
13 2 4 6 8 100 12
n!! = n × (n − 2) × (n − 4) × · · · × 3 × 1
n!! = n × (n − 2) × (n − 4) × · · · × 4 × 2.
13!!! = 13 × 10 × 7 × 4 × 1,
14!!!! = 14 × 10 × 6 × 2,
15!!!!! = 15 × 10 × 5.
The interested reader can explore these extended factorials further at their leisure.
The product of fractions in our problem can be rewritten as
99!!
100!!
which can be calculated with WolframAlpha as
2725392139750729502980713245400918633290796330545803413734328823443106201171875
34243224702511976248246432895208185975118675053719198827915654463488000000000000
2.72 × 1078
≈
3.42 × 1079
≈ 0.0795.
However, even though we can verify the result with technology, it isn’t very sat-
isfying (unless it is to give us further insight – more on that later). As such, we
will attempt to verify the inequality without resorting to calculating the results
by electronic means.
√
As 100 = 10, we might see if we can generalize this situation, and conjecture
that
1 3 5 7 2n − 1 1
Pn = · · · ··· <√
2 4 6 8 2n 2n
This seems like a perfect situation to use mathematical induction (for an intro-
duction to induction, check out [2019 : 45(5), 236-240] ). Clearly, as 12 < √12 , the
statement is true for n = 1. Assume it is true for n = k, so
1 3 5 7 2k − 1 1
Pk = · · · ··· <√
2 4 6 8 2k 2k
Hence
2k + 1 1 2k + 1 1 (2k + 1)2
Pk+1 = Pk · <√ · =√ ·
2k + 2 2k 2k + 2 2k (2k + 2)2
and thus
1 4k 2 + 4k + 1 1
Pk+1 < √ · 2
>√
2k + 2 4k + 4k 2k + 2
which isn’t helpful since as it doesn’t tell us the larger of Pk+1 and √ 1 .
2k+2
Let’s step back and try another approach. It would be nice if we could get some
of the terms in our product to cancel out, simplifying our expression. With that
in mind, if we define
2 4 6 8 2n
Pn0 = · · · · · ·
3 5 7 9 2n + 1
then as 2
3 > 12 , 4
5 > 34 , 6
7 > 65 , . . . , we must have Pn0 > Pn for all n. Therefore,
1
which can be simplified, after cancelling terms out, to Pn2 < or
2n + 1
1
Pn < √
2n + 1
which is a stronger inequality than the one we originally conjectured. That is, for
the problem at hand we must have
1 3 5 7 99 1
· · · ··· <√
2 4 6 8 100 101
1 1 1
but as √101 < √100 = 10 , the original inequality is verified. The interested reader
is encouraged to retry the induction proof attempted above with the stronger
inequality.
As I mentioned earlier, the technologically aided “solutions” were not very satis-
fying. However, as I was writing this column, I added in the technological part
after I had done the more satisfying proofs. As noted in several places, it seems
that the generalized inequality could be strengthened. Looking and playing with
the numbers in the spreadsheet, I was able to conjecture and prove that
1
Pn < √
3n + 1
However, the induction proof fell through. When I tried, like before, the stronger
conjecture
1
Pn < √ .
πn + 1
I could prove the induction hypothesis but, unfortunately, didn’t have anywhere
to start as for every case I checked, Pn was larger, so I was stuck.
However, the appearance of π was intriguing, so I kept digging. If we want to
write Pn in terms of regular factorials, this can be accomplished by
1 3 2n − 1
Pn = · ···
2 4 2n
1 2 3 4 2n − 1 2n
= · · · ··· ·
2 2 4 4 2n 2n
(2n)!
=
(2 · 4 · · · 2n)2
(2n)!
=
(2 · 1 · 2 · · · n)2
n
(2n)!
=
4n (n!)2
Ç å
1 2n
=
4n n
This looked familiar to me. I had seen that the central numbers in Pascal’s triangle,
2n
n , are related to the Catalan numbers, Cn . The Catalan numbers have many
applications. One application is if you take a convex polygon with n + 2 sides, it
can be cut into n triangles by connecting vertices with non-crossing line segments.
The number of different ways this can be accomplished is Cn .
For our problem, if we use the fact that
Ç å
1 2n
Cn =
n+1 n
Interested readers are directed to the Wikipedia page for Stirling’s approximation
to the factorial. There are some bounds on the factorial that will be useful in
proving the upper bound of the inequality above. This just goes to show how far
down the rabbit hole you can go with some problems if you allow yourself the time
to do some playing.
.................................................................
I hope you enjoyed the two problems we looked at in this column. I leave you with
five more from Professor Honsberger’s course.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
No. 423
The problems featured in this section have appeared in a regional or national mathematical
Olympiad.
OC681. Let p1 , p2 , . . . , p100 be one hundred distinct prime numbers. The nat-
ural numbers a1 , . . . , ak are greater than 1 and are such that each of the numbers
p1 p32 , p2 p33 , . . . , p99 p3100 , p100 p31 is equal to the product of some two of the numbers
a1 , . . . , ak . Prove that k ≥ 150.
OC683. Given a natural number k > 1. A natural number n > 1 and coprime
to k is called correct if for any natural divisor d (d < n) of n the number d + k is
not coprime to n. Prove that there are a finite number of correct numbers.
OC685. The cells of a 10×10 table contain the natural numbers 1, 2, . . . , 99, 100.
Let’s call the figure that is obtained by removing one cell from a 2 × 2 square a
corner. Let’s call a corner good if the number in its cell, bordering on the sides
with two others, is greater than the numbers in these two other cells. What is
the largest possible number of good corners? (Each corner is counted regardless
of how it is positioned in relation to the others. Different corners may overlap.)
.................................................................
Les problèmes présentés dans cette section ont déjà été présentés dans le cadre d’une
olympiade mathématique régionale ou nationale.
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 31 juillet 2024.
OLYMPIAD CORNER
SOLUTIONS
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(9), p. 532–533.
OC656. Let P be the set of all prime numbers. Find all functions f : P → P
such that:
f (p)f (q) + q p = f (q)f (p) + pq
holds for all p, q ∈ P.
Originally from the 2019 Balkan Mathematics Olympiad, Problem 1, Proposed by
Dorlir Ahmeti, Albania.
We received 2 solutions. We present the solution by UCLan Cyprus Problem Solv-
ing Group.
We know that this is from the Balkan Mathematical Olympiad of 2019.
Note that if f (p) = f (q), then q p = pq which gives that p = q. Therefore f is
injective.
If f (2) is odd, then taking p = 2 and q an odd prime we get that f (q)f (p) is
even which gives that f (q) is even and therefore f (q) = 2. This contradicts the
injectivity of f . Therefore f (2) = 2.
Now let p = 2 and q an odd prime. Let r = f (q). We get 2r + q 2 = r2 + 2q . We
will show that r = q.
We claim that the function g : N → N defined by g(n) = 2n − n2 is increasing for
n ≥ 3. Indeed
which can easily be shown by induction to be positive for n ≥ 3. Since g(2) = g(4),
then g(q) = g(r) =⇒ q = r or {q, r} = {2, 4}. In particular, since q, r are primes,
r = q as claimed.
Thus the only function that satisfies the given equation is f (p) = p for all p ∈ P.
CM sin δ
= .
DM sin γ
In triangles ADB and ACB we have ∠ADB = ∠ACB, and thus, using the law of
sines, we get
BC sin α
= .
AD sin β
Triangles DAM and CBM are similar because ∠DM A = ∠CM B and
and thus CM/DM = BC/AD. From the above we get sin δ/ sin γ = sin α/ sin β.
But ∠AEC = ∠DEB = 90◦ + θ and α + γ = δ + β = 90◦ − θ. Thus,
sin δ sin α
= ⇐⇒ sin(θ + 2δ) = sin(θ + 2α).
sin(90◦ − θ − α) sin(90◦ − θ − δ)
Therefore, we get α = δ or
The latter contradicts the condition that AB is not parallel to CD, and thus α = δ.
Therefore, ADM E is cyclic; thus
OC659. Find all sequences of integers a0 , a1 , a2 , . . . such that for any integers
k, l ≥ 0, we have
ak − al | k 2 − l2 .
That is for any integers k, l ≥ 0 there exists an integer z such that
(ak − al )z = k 2 − l2 .
OC660. Let ABC be a triangle, and M the midpoint of the side BC. Let E
and F be points on the sides AC and AB, respectively, so that M E = M F . Let D
be the second intersection of the circumcircle of M EF and the side BC. Consider
the lines `D , `E and `F through D, E and F , respectively, such that `D ⊥ BC,
`E ⊥ CA, and `F ⊥ AB. Show that `D , `E and `F are concurrent.
Originally from the 2023 37th Nordic Mathematical Contest, Problem 4.
We received 4 solutions and we present 2 of them.
Solution 1, by Michel Bataille.
Let Γ be the circumcircle of ∆M EF and let K be the point of Γ diametrically
opposite to M . Since D, E, F is on Γ, we have
KD ⊥ BC, KE ⊥ EM, KF ⊥ F M
and
−−→ −−→
AB · F K = cF K cos(180◦ − ∠KF A),
we finally obtain
−→ −−→ −−→ −−→
CA · EK + AB · F K = 0. (1)
We will make use of the following lemma: if I is the midpoint of the segment U V ,
then the point H of U V is the orthogonal projection of X on the line U V if and
−→ −−→
only if IH · U V = 12 (XU 2 − XV 2 ).
Proof. The result immediately follows from:
The transformations f and g trivially agree when B = M as then f (B) and g(B)
are the other point of intersection of the circumcircle of DEF M with `.
Now let B be the point of intersection of the bisector of ∠DF E with the line M D.
Since
∠BDE = ∠EF M = ∠F EM = ∠F DM,
This article is the second of three on this topic. For Part A, please refer to Crux,
50(4), p. 190-193.
It is natural to ask whether, for any value of k, there are k−quadruples of numbers
for which the product of any pair plus k is a square. The construction described
in the previous section makes it quite straightforward to answer this in the affir-
mative. If we extend the triple (x, y, x + y + 2c) to the left, we get the quadruple
(x + y − 2c, x, y, x + y + 2c).
is equal to d2 for some integer d. In other words, we need to find numbers express-
ible in each of the forms φ(x, y) = x2 + xy + y 2 and ψ(c, d) = 3c2 + d2 .
Exercise 10. Prove that φ(x, y) = x2 + xy + y 2 and ψ(c, d) = 3c2 + d2 take the
same set of integer values, where x, y, c and d are integers. (Hint: given (c, d), let
(x, y) = (c + d, c − d). How can you go from (x, y) to a corresponding (c, d)?)
In order to get k−quadruples whose entries are distinct, we can exploit the fact
the some numbers can be represented by both of the forms φ(x, y) or ψ(c, d) in
several ways, so that we can get numerous examples of k−quadruples by using
each c with each of the pairs (x, y) involved.
Exercise 11. There are several ways of representing each of the numbers 49, 91
and 133 by φ(x, y) and ψ(c, d). For each, use all of the possible triples (x, y, c) to
construct k−triples.
Exercise 14. Not every k−triple generates a succession of k−triples when embed-
ded in a sequence satisfying the congenial recurrence. For example, when x = y,
there are triples for which (x, x, z) is a k−triple, but its right associate (x, z, x+2z)
is not. With xy + k = c2 , zx + k = b2 , yz + k = a2 , we have the examples:
k (x, y, z) (a, b, c)
4r4 + 8r3 − 4r + 1 (2r + 1, 2r + 1, 2(2r + 1)) (2r2 + 2r + 1, 2r2 + 2r + 1, 2r2 + 2r)
r4 − 6r2 s2 + s4 (2rs, 2rs, 4rs) (r2 + s2 , r2 + s2 , r2 − s2 )
35 × 145 − 31 = 712 + 3,
We find that
Finding pairs of Pythagorean triples with a common leg arise in the determination
of Heronian triangles, whose sides and area are all integers. Such triangles can be
constructed by pasting together two right triangles that share a common leg, as
shown in the diagram.
a c b
x y
Exercise 16.
(a) We can take as a particular example x = r −2, y = r +2, a = 2r −1, b = 2r +1,
where r is an integer that exceeds 2. Show that, if there is a solution in integers,
then c = 3s where r2 − 3s2 = 1.
(b) r2 − 3s2 = 1 is an example of a Pell’s equation which has infinitely many
solutions. Determine the solution (r1 , s1 ) with the smallest positive integers, and
show that, for each n, (rn , sn ) is a solution where
√ √
rn + sn 3 = (r1 + s1 3)n .
Both the sequences {rn } and {sn } satisfy the same second order recursion; find it.
Also show how each of rn+1 and sn+1 can be written as linear combinations of rn
and sn .
In each appearance of this column, we feature one math book by collecting, com-
menting, and solving problems from it. In this issue we focus on a recent problem
book. There will also be some problems at the end for you to solve and send us.
.................................................................
Solved Problems
Problem 1. A circle w passing through points A and B is externally tangent to
a circle w1 . Line AB intersects circle w1 at points C and D. Let r1 and R be the
radii of circles w1 and w, respectively. Prove that
|AB| R |AB|
p p < <p p .
|AC| · |BD| + |BC| · |AD| r1 |AC| · |BD| − |BC| · |AD|
Solution. Let M be the point of tangency between circles w and w 1 . Extend line
AM to intersect w1 at A0 . Since M A0 = rR1 · |M A|, AA0 = 1 + rR1 · |M A|. Using
|AD| · |AC| = |AM | · |AA0 | one can show that
p
|AC| · |AD|
|M A| =
1 + rR1
p
and similarly p
|BC| · |BD|
|M B| = .
1 + rR1
p
|M B| − |M A| < AB < |M A| + |M B|
and simplify.
Problem 2. Under the conditions of Problem 1, prove also that if w2 is another
circle passing through points C and D, and is externally tangent to circle w, then
p p
|AC| · |BD| − |BC| · |AD|
…
r1
p p < ,
|AC| · |BD| + |BC| · |AD| r2
Problem 3. Let circles w and w1 of radii R and r be externally tangent. Let the
extension of chord AB of circle w be tangent to circle w1 at point C. Let CD be
tangent to circle w. Prove that
…
|AB| R
< .
2|CD| r
Solution. Like the previous problem, this one is a direct corollary of Problem 1
(case |CD| = 0). But we will give an independent solution here.
where the ± is because of the position of O with respect to line AB. So,
!2
n + m 2 n − m 2
2
(R + r) = + r± R2 − .
2 2
Simplifying, we obtain
s »
R R 2 n−m 2
n−m r ± r − 2r
√ = .
2 mn 2
Consequently, …
|AB| n−m R
= √ < .
2|CD| 2 mn r
Solution. The inequality follows from the previous problem (this is the special
case |AB| = 2R in Problem 4), but we will give an independent proof here. Let
O1 and O be the centers of w1 and w. Then
Using the Pythagorean theorem for 4O1 AO one can show that
p
|O1 A| = r2 + 2Rr.
√
√ same method for 4O1 AB, one can √
Using the show that |AB| = 2Rr. Similarly,
|CD| = 2Rr and therefore, |AB| = |CD| > Rr is true.
√
Problem 5. Do equality |AB| = |CD| and inequality |AB| > Rr remain true
if circles w and w1 are (1) non-intersecting (2) properly intersecting?
Solution. Using the method of the previous problem one can show that
p
|AB| = |CD| = d2 − R2 − r2 ,
d2 > R2 + Rr + r2 .
So, if the
√ circles are non-intersecting, then d > R + r and therefore inequality
|AB| > Rr is always true. But if the circles are properly intersecting, then the
inequality holds true when ∠O1 XO > 120◦ , where O1 and O are the centers of
circles w1 and w, and X is one of the intersection points of these circles.
Problems to solve
S11. Two circles w1 and w2 intersect at distinct points points B and C, and
a third circle w is internally tangent to w1 and w2 at M and N , respectively.
Line BC intersects w at A and D, with A nearer B than D to B. Prove that
the tangents of w at M and N and the line BC are concurrent. Prove also that
∠AM B = ∠CM D and
|BC| sin ∠CM B
> .
|AD| sin ∠AM D
S12. Under the conditions of S11, prove also that the ratio of |AB| · |CD| to
|AC| · |BD| is independent of the locations of A and D (for B and C fixed).
S13. Under the conditions of S11, prove also that if r, r1 , and r2 are the radii
of w, w1 and w2 , respectively, with r1 ≤ r2 , then for i = 1, 2, we have
|AD| |AD|
…
r
p p < <p p .
|AC| · |BD| + |AB| · |CD| ri |AC| · |BD| − |AB| · |CD|
S14. Under the conditions of S11 and S13, prove also that
p p
|AC| · |BD| − |AB| · |CD|
…
r1
p p < .
|AC| · |BD| + |AB| · |CD| r2
References
[1] Y.N. Aliyev, Inequalities on Ratios of Radii of Tangent Circles, Mathematical
Reflections, 5 (2015) 1–6.
[2] Y.N. Aliyev, Use of dynamic geometry software in teaching and research, 5th
International Conference on AICT, 12–14 October 2011, Baku, 212–214. https:
//doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2011.6110920
[3] Y.N. Aliyev, Problem 11689, Amer. Math. Month., 120(1), January 2013, 77.
[4] Y.N. Aliyev, Aufgabe 1318, Elem. Math., 68(2013) 128.
[5] T. Andreescu, (Ed.), Mathematical Reflections Two Special Years (2014–2015),
XYZ Press, 2016.
[6] G. Bercea, Solution: Aufgabe 1318, Elem. Math., 69(2014), 164–165.
[7] R. Stong, Solution to Problem 11689, A Tale of Three Circles, Amer. Math.
Month., 122(3) (2015) 285–286.
PROBLEMS
Click here to submit problems proposals as well as solutions, comments
and generalizations to any problem in this section.
Let ABC be a given triangle and let M, N be the interior points on the side BC
such that BM = CN . Prove that
AB 2 AC 2
+ > AB + AC.
AN AM
ab bc ca 3
+ + ≥ ,
c(a + b)2 a(b + c)2 b(c + a)2 4
.................................................................
Pour faciliter l’examen des solutions, nous demandons aux lecteurs de les faire parvenir
au plus tard le 31 juillet 2024.
AB 2 AC 2
+ > AB + AC.
AN AM
SOLUTIONS
No problem is ever permanently closed. The editor is always pleased to consider for
publication new solutions or new insights on past problems.
Statements of the problems in this section originally appear in 2023: 49(10), p. 539–543.
Similarly, we obtain
p
It now suffices to prove G ≥ 18 6 (xy + yz + zx)3 , which is equivalent to showing
3
that H ≥ 4(xy + yz + zx) , where
3
Expressed in this form it is clear that H ≥ 4(xy + yz + zx) .
Let P be the midpoint of the minor arc BC. Since OM is the perpendicular
bisector of BC, the points H, O, M, P are collinear; so are points A, I, P. Points
B, I, C are on the circle (P, P I) (because ∠P BI = ∠P IB = (∠A + ∠B)/2, and
∠P IC = ∠P CI = (∠A + ∠C)/2).
Let V be the point of intersection of the lines AS and BC. Then points V, S, I, D
are concyclic because ∠V SI = ∠V DI = 90◦ . Considering the power of point V
with respect to the circles (O), (L), and (P ) we get V S · V A = V B · V C. But the
circles (L) and (P ) are tangent at I, and thus the line V I is the common tangent
at I of the circles (L) and (P ). Therefore,
Let R be the point of intersection of the line ID with the line SH. In the right
triangle U DR we have DS ⊥ U R, and thus
U D2 = U S · U R.
Also,
∠SOB + ∠P OC ∠SOB + ∠BOP ∠SOP
∠SRI = ∠U RD = ∠SDU = = =
2 2 2
= ∠SAP = ∠SAI. (1)
Therefore, point R is on the circle (L), and point U has the same power with
respect to circles (L) and (I), which have F E as a common chord. Therefore, U
is on the line F E.
Let J 0 be the point of intersection of ST with the line F E, and let X be the
midpoint of F E. We prove that J 0 coincides with the given point J = F E ∩ AK:
because AI is the perpendicular bisector of F E, it follows that SAXJ 0 is cyclic.
Therefore, with the help of equation (1), ∠SJ 0 U = ∠SAI = ∠SDU. Thus, J 0 is
on the circle (U SDK), whence
∠P OH − ∠SOK ∠HOS + ∠KOP ∠AOS + ∠KOT
∠KJ 0 T = ∠KU S = = = .
2 2 2
Therefore, the points K, J 0 , A are collinear, and thus J 0 ≡ J, as desired.
Points O, L, N are the midpoints of the segments AT, AI, AJ, respectively. There-
fore, these points are on the line OL; it is parallel to ST and is the perpendicular
bisector of segment AS, the common chord of the circles (O) and (L). If W is the
midpoint of segment SA, then
(where for the last equality, ∠KSO is the complement of the angle between the
chord SK and the tangent at S to the circumcircle; that angle equals ∠SHK).
Therefore, the quadrilateral SN OK is cyclic. This completes the proof that the
points S, N, O, M, K are concyclic.
(Note: Some of the incidences suggested by the diagrams are indeed further prop-
erties of the configuration; for example, the midpoint Q of the segment DH is also
on the circle (SN OM K), because QO k DP and thus
Similarly, the midpoint Z of the segment DP is also on circle (SN OM K), because
QZ k HP and thus ∠SZQ = ∠SP H = ∠SKH.)
Editor’s comments. Two of the solutions used cartesian coordinates (and consid-
erable computer power) to verify the result. Such arguments are unreadable by
humans, but they are useful in showing that there is no need to assume that the
given triangle be acute (except to ensure that the diagram can be used to guide the
proof). On the other hand, the assumption that AB < AC is significant — should
AB = AC, the featured proof collapses and the points M, N, O, K are collinear
(not concyclic). The proposer’s solution was based on the interesting observation
that the points S and K on the circumcircle are harmonic conjugates with respect
to the vertices B and C.
and by addition with (1) that f (x) + f (−x) = 0. From the continuity of f at 0,
we see that 2f (0) = 0, hence f (−x) = −f (x) for all x ∈ [−1, 1]: f is odd. Note
that (1) also provides f (1) = 2.
Now, suppose that 0 < x < 1. For any positive integer n, we have
n n n
Ä ä
f (x) − 2x = 2n x2 −1 f (x2 ) − 2x2 (H(n))
The proof is by induction. (1) shows that H(1) holds. Assume that H(n) holds
n
for some n ≥ 1. From (1) applied to x2 instead of x, we obtain
n n n n+1 n
f (x2 ) − 2x2 = 2x2 f (x2 ) − 4x3·2 ,
hence H(n) gives f (x) = 2x. Since f (0) = 0, f (1) = 2 and f is odd, we see that
f (x) = 2x for all x ∈ [−1, 1] and we are done.
Editor’s Comments. In their solution, Raymond Mortini and Rudolf Rupp explic-
itly noted the need to interpret this functional equation at x = 0 as
Ç Z 1/x å
2 2
lim x + f (x t)dt = 1.
x→0 1
Now
1 1 1 1
Hn−1 Hn+1 − Hn−2 Hn = Hn − Hn + − Hn − − Hn
n n+1 n n−1
1 1 1
= + Hn − ,
n−1 n+1 n(n + 1)
so
HM −1 HM +1
S(M ) = S1 (M ) + S2 (M ) − S3 (M ) − ,
M +1
where
M M M
X Hn X Hn X 1
S1 (M ) = , S2 (M ) = , S3 (M ) = .
n=2
(n − 1)n n=2
n(n + 1) n=2
2
n (n + 1)
1 HM
S1 (M ) = 2 − − ,
M M
M
X 1 1 HM
S2 (M ) = 2
+ − , and
n=2
n 2 M +1
M
X 1 1 1
S3 (M ) = 2
− + .
n=2
n 2 M +1
It follows that
1 1 HM −1 HM +1
S(M ) = 3 − + (1 + HM ) − .
M M +1 M +1
Since HM = O(ln M ) as M tends to infinity, we conclude lim S(M ) = 3.
M →∞
1 1 1 1 1
= + − 2 −
n2 (n + 1)2 n2 (n + 1)2 n n+1
we obtain C = ζ(2) + ζ(2) − 1 − 2 = 2ζ(2) − 3. Thus S = 3.
Editor’s Comments. Every submission lay somewhere between these two. Of the
many closed forms for the partial sums obtained by solvers, Solution 1’s stood out
as the cleanest with the simplest derivation. R. Mortini and R. Rupp report that
WolframAlpha has trouble evaluating this series directly.
A'
A
A1
F G' E
G1
G
B1
O
C1
B' C
D
B
C'
A'
A1
U N V E
F
B1
M
C1
B'
C
D
B
C'
K E
H U N V
F
B1
M
C1
We received 10 interesting solutions for this problem, all correct. The following is
the solution by M. Bello, M. Benito, Ó. Ciaurri and E. Fernández and presents
the main ideas of all the solutions in more details.
The recurrence law xn+1 = 4xn − xn−1 is a homogeneous discrete linear equation
of constant coefficients and characteristic equation
r2 − 4r + 1 = 0.
√
Characteristic roots: r = 2 ± 3. General solution:
√ √
xn = A(2 + 3)n + B(2 − 3)n .
√
given that for any a ≥ 3/2 the inequalities a − 1 ≤ a2 − 2 < a both hold. So,
again taking integer parts
p
4xn − 1 ≤ b 8x2n+1 + 6c < 4xn . (3)
1 1 1
bn sin 2θ + (1 − n)c sin 4θ = b sin 2θ.
2 2 2
Using the fact that sin 4θ = 2 sin 2θ cos 2θ, rearranging terms, and simplifying
yields:
b = 2c cos 2θ.
b2 (a − m) + c2 m − a (a − m) m
AD2 = . (4)
a
Now we use the fact that ∠B = 2∠C is equivalent to the condition
b2 = c (c + a) , (5)
which has appeared before in Crux [1996:74], [1978:278], [1984:287] and [1996:265-
267].
In turn, the fact that ∠C = 2∠CAD is equivalent to the condition
AD2 = DC · DC + CA = m (m + b) .
(6)
AD2 = c2 + (a − m) (c − m) .
c (c + a) c (c + a) b2 bc
m= = = (using (2)) = 2 = .
a+b+c b + (c + a) b + bc b+c
π
Let θ = ∠DCB. Then ∠BAE = − θ. The given side lengths imply
4
√
BC = 8 2 cos θ
and using the sum of angles formula for cosine,
π
AB = 9 cos −θ
4 π π
= 9 cos cos θ + sin sin θ
√ 4 4
9 2
= cos θ + sin θ .
2
Therefore
9 cos θ + sin θ 9
Å ã
AB
tan (2θ) = = = (1 + tan θ) .
BC 16 cos θ 16
On the other hand, using the double angle formula for tangent, we get
2 tan θ
tan (2θ) = .
1 − tan2 θ
We received 21 submissions and they were all correct. We present the following
solution by the majority of solvers.
Observe that if m > 1, then
mn
X 1 X Å (k+1)n
m−1 X 1 ã m−1X 1
Hmn − Hn = = ≥ = Hm − 1.
j=n+1
j j k+1
k=1 j=kn+1 k=1
It follows that Hm + Hn ≤ 1 + Hmn for all positive integers m, n. Thus, for any
positive integers m, n, p, q, we have
Hm + Hn + Hp + Hq ≤ Hmn + 1 + Hpq + 1 ≤ 3 + Hmnpq .
Editor’s Comment. Another common solution by the solvers uses the well-known
fact that Hn can be well approximated by log n + γ, where γ ≈ 0.577 is the
Euler-Mascheroni constant. In fact, several readers pointed out the inequality
γ + Hmn ≤ Hm + Hn ≤ 1 + Hmn has appeared in Problem E819, Amer. Math.
Monthly 56 (1949), no.2.