CH 1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
CH 1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Shipping is perhaps one of the most globalised industries. For such an industry
to work with common standards, legislation is very important. Legislation affects
all aspects of shipping from construction to safe operations. Navigation is no
different.
Navigation and related issues are covered under international instruments, like
SOLAS, STCW and Collision Regulations. In addition, the flag states advise
own ships through regulations, codes and notices. The main areas of interest
are:
Safety of navigation (covered under SOLAS Chapter V, National Laws
and Bridge Procedures Guide by ICS)
Carriage of Navigational Equipment and Publications (covered under
SOLAS and National Laws)
Training and Certification (covered under STCW’72 / 95)
Management (covered under ISM Code in SOLAS’74)
Collision Regulations (COLREGS’72)
The full title of the ISM Code is: “The international management code for the
safe operation of ships and for pollution prevention”. The objective was to
ensure safety, to prevent human injury or loss of life, and to avoid damage to
the environment, in particular, the marine environment, and to property.
Navigation safety is an element that can help with achieving the objective, at
least, in part.
1.1.1 SMS
1.1.1.2 PROCEDURES
A full set of instructions and procedures to perform the ship operations safely
and for environment protection, while satisfying applicable international and flag
state requirements: The procedures are likely to be covered in a lengthy
section. The Code requires procedures to be available for all aspects of
operations. This implies that all known aspects of navigation need to be covered
by the procedures. The procedures provide clear instructions – in line with
company policy – to prepare for navigation, execution and monitoring, including
relevant records and review of performance. The procedures will define
applicable safety limits to be maintained in certain circumstances. Maintenance
and upkeep of equipment and associated material will also be covered.
Similarly, Master may follow advice from external authorities (e.g., routeing
instructions) and may override it as well to ensure safety of vessel and
prevention of damage to environment.
Critics of the Code use arguments like “If all procedures are in place, what is the
need for training”? It must be said that the procedures are for guidance only and
are generic. Not all situations are the same. Those responsible for navigation
need to have detailed knowledge and understanding of the tasks and their
duties in order to deal with all types of circumstances and scenarios. This also
applies to instructions from external bodies. A Master, fully competent on the
navigational issues, can make a sound judgement whether or not to follow the
advice or guidance or prepare own plans to meet requirements and to ensure
safety of ship, crew and the environment.
Another debate is about the perceived conflict between the requirements under
the ISM Code to produce a wide range of documents and reports as a part of its
SMS and the consequential production of potentially self incriminating evidence
which could be used against those who produced that evidence. This text is no
place to state the right or wrong answer to the conflicting position. The only
comment by the author is that the compliance with the Code – and hence the
SMS – is a legal requirement and where it demands records to be maintained,
such records cannot be avoided. Secondly, the Code is designed to ensure
safety and prevent accidents or incidents. Where these are still happening, then
something is going wrong somewhere and the authorities should use some
tools to teach appropriate lessons. The issue of use of records for commercial
cases is beyond the scope of this text.
applicable in general to all ships on all voyages. It should be noted that SOLAS
Convention applies to certain classes of ships engaged on international
voyages, in contrast to Chapter V which applies to all ships.
The subjects covered include a general obligation for masters to proceed to the
assistance of those in distress, the maintenance of meteorological services for
ships, the ice patrol service, routeing of ships, and the maintenance of search
and rescue services.
This Chapter requires Contracting Governments to ensure that all ships shall be
sufficiently and efficiently manned from a safety point of view. The chapter
makes mandatory the carriage of voyage data recorders (VDR) and automatic
ship identification systems (AIS) for certain ships.
The Master of every ship which meets with any of the following shall make a
report by all available means to the nearest coast radio station or signal station
in English. These messages shall be sent on DSC, R/T, Inmarsat. These
messages shall be preceded by SECURITE (or PAN PAN as appropriate).
Tropical storms
Winds of force 10 and above of which there has been no warning.
Air temperatures below freezing, associated with gale force wind causing
severe icing.
Dangerous ice
Dangerous derelict
The contents of the reports have been included in appropriate chapters where
the messages are relevant.
1.3.1 CONTENTS
1.3.1.1 PART – A
Covers guidance to Masters and navigating officers on the following:
Bridge resource and bridge team management
Notes on passage planning in ocean waters, in restricted waters,
pilotage, ship’s routeing and ship’s reporting systems and vessel traffic
services.
Duties of the OOW with regards to watch-keeping, navigation,
communication, pollution prevention and emergency situations.
Operation and maintenance of bridge equipment.
Annexes containing various formats used for Pilotage, distress
frequencies, guidance on steering gear test routines.
1.3.1.2 PART – B
Includes bridge checklists for routine bridge procedures for the following:
1.3.1.3 PART – C
Includes checklists for use during emergency:
Main engine or steering failure
Collision
Stranding or grounding
Man overboard
Fire
Flooding
Search and rescue
Abandoning ship
1.4 BUOYAGE
IALA (The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation Lighthouse
Authorities) has set the design and standard of buoys to be used for
navigational purposes.
The world is divided into two regions – A and B for the purpose of Lateral
Marks. B includes all of Americas, Japan, Philippines and S. Korea. The
cardinal marks are uniform throughout the world.
Direction of buoyage can be found from the navigational charts or the sailing
directions. Locally, it is the direction taken by the mariner from the seaward
when approaching a harbour, river, estuary or other waterway. Generally, it is
determined by buoyage authorities, and is mainly clockwise around continental
landmasses.
When following the lateral marks, the vessels should remain as near to the
mark on the starboard hand side of the ship as appropriate. While proceeding
with the direction of buoyage it will be the starboard hand marks and while
going against the direction of buoyage it would be the port hand marks.
New dangers are marked by one or more cardinal or lateral marks as per IALA
system. Lights if fitted are quick or very quick.
Where the danger is especially grave, at least one of the marks would be
duplicated by an identical mark as soon as practicable, until the danger has
been well promulgated. A RACON with Morse code D, showing a signal length
of one nautical mile on a radar display may be used on the duplicate mark.
1.5 ISPS
The provisions of International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) may
have a bearing on navigation. At the planning stage, areas with heightened
security threats should be avoided, passed at increased distance or transits
completed allowing for added precautions.
The ships officers should be aware of evasive manoeuvres as per security plan
of the ship. Similarly, depending upon the security level of a port, ship should be
able to stay clear of port where required or the ship should be ready to leave
port at very short notice where the conditions dictate. Contingency plans for all
eventualities should, at least, be available in tabular format for transfer to
navigational charts where required.
1.6 STCW
The International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and
Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW), 1978, was adapted by the International
Conference on Training and Certification of Seafarers on 7 July 1978. The 1978
STCW Convention entered into force on 28 April 1984. Since then three
amendments to it were adapted in 1991, 1994 and 1995.
The 1991 amendments relate to Global Maritime Distress and Safety System
(GMDSS) and entered into force on 1 December 1992. The 1994 amendments
relate to special training requirements for personnel on tankers and entered into
force on 1 January 1996.
In the 1995 amendments, complete revision of the annex to the 1978 STCW
Convention took place in order to clarify the standards of competence required,
qualification requirements for trainers and assessors, provide effective
mechanisms for enforcement of its provisions and allow greater flexibility in the
assignment of functions on board ship and thus broaden the career
opportunities of seafarers. The minimum global standards of knowledge,
understanding, experience and professional competence desired by the States,
which are Parties to it, the maritime industry and the general public are given
full and complete effect by the Convention. The STCW 1995 came fully into
force on 1 February 2002.
The STCW Code stipulates the minimum training and certification requirements
for Masters, Chief Mates, OOW’s and Ratings. These are governed by STCW
Regulations and take ship’s gross tonnage and near/non-near coastal voyages
as criteria. It is also a factor in deciding safe manning levels of ships.
1.7 POLLUTION
The concern for the navigator is to advise the relevant departments about the
distances from the nearest land, depth of water (for chemical tankers) and the
presence of ship within relevant special areas. Specific authority from bridge
should be obtained before any MARPOL controlled discharges from the ship.
Considering the experience of aviation industry with the “Black-Box”, IMO has
made it mandatory for ships to be fitted with “Voyage Data Recorder” (VDR).
The main purpose of VDR is to have the data available to investigators after an
incident in order to gain a better understanding of the events that led to an
incident, particularly where the ship is lost without trace, or all records have
been lost, or the crew have perished during the accident.
The requirement is part of SOLAS under Chapter V. The following ships are
required to be fitted with VDR:
passenger ships built on or after 1st July 2002;
ro-ro passenger ships built before 1st July 2002 not later than the first
survey on or after 1st July 2002;
passenger ships other than ro-ro passenger ships built before 1st July
2002 not later than 1st January 2004; and
ships, other than passenger ships, of 3,000 GT and upwards built on or
after 1st July 2002.
The equipment should be approved before installation. VDR system and all
sensors shall be tested annually throughout the life of the ship. The test should
be conducted in conjunction with the relevant statutory survey, i.e., for
Passenger Ship Safety Certificate (PC), Cargo Ship Safety Certificate (CSC) or
Cargo Ship Safety Equipment Certificate (SEC). The survey must be within the
period permitted by the Harmonised System of Survey and Certification, which
is 3 months before the due date for PC, and +/- 3 months of due date for CSC
and SEC surveys. On successful completion of test and satisfactory
performance, the administration will issue a performance test certificate to the
ship which must be kept on board.
The test shall include verification of the accuracy, duration and recoverability of
the recorded data. In addition, tests and inspections shall be conducted to
determine the serviceability of all protective enclosures and devices fitted to aid
location. It is important to turn off the VDR shortly after arrival into a port where
test is to be performed to prevent any over-writing of data.