MM Unit 2
MM Unit 2
requires the
agility and drive
to constantly
rethink,
reinvigorate,
react, and
reinvent.”
– Bill Gates
Initiatives by Apple
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFWWP
ECmp64
“FedEx is proud to play an
active role in improving lives
and creating possibilities,
whether it's by donating
critical relief supplies or
helping locally through our
volunteering initiatives. We
are committed to supporting
the communities in which
we live and work,”
said Jack Muhs, regional
president, FedEx Express
Middle East, Indian
Subcontinent and Africa.
Strategy
Technology
Integrated supply chain system, real-time sales information
Development
MARGINS
Real-time inventory, communication with suppliers, purchase supplies &
Procurement materials
Strategic Marketing
It lays down the target markets and firm’s value proposition,
based on the analysis of the best market opportunitites Plan
Tactical
This specifies the marketing tactics, including product features,
Marketing Plan promotion, merchandising, pricing, sales channels and services
Central Role of Strategic Planning
Establishing a strategy
Organizational Levels
Corporate
Division
Business
Product
Strategic Planning, Implementation, and
Control Processes
Corporate and Division Strategic Planning
Assessing growth
opportunities
An independently managed
division of a large
organization with its own
vision, mission and
objectives responsible for
planning, developing,
producing and marketing its
own goods or services
Characteristics of SBU’s
The matrix enables to determine which assets could produce future revenues
and make investment decisions that ensure funds are allocated to the right
assets.
cows.
Divest strategy
• For stars products
Boston Consulting Group - Advantages
It provides a base for management to decide and prepare for future actions.
Boston Consulting Group - Disadvantages
The model neglects small competitors that have fast growing market shares.
The BCG matrix is a great starting point, it’s not enough on its own to guide
the future of a company.
Like the BCG approach, it uses a matrix with two dimensions – one
representing industry attractiveness (the vertical axis) and the other one
representing company strength in the industry (the horizontal axis).
The nine cell grid measures business unit strength of the SBU’s against
industry attractiveness and this is the key difference.
General Electric Approach
The GE Matrix is plotted in a two-dimensional, 3 x 3 grid.
The X-axis measures business unit strength on a high, medium, or low score.
General Electric Approach
High Medium Low
A mixture of solid business
performance and an
High attractive industry. They are
primed for growth and
should be allocated
resources and capital.
These blocks aren’t
performing optimally or
operate in an unattractive
Medium industry. These business
units require a more
conservative approach to
either growth or divestment
strategies.
A business should be
Low
closed, further investment
should be withheld, or the
company should be run for
cash.
BCG Matrix - General Electric Approach Similarities
Both use a two-dimensional graph to plot a company's business units or
products.
Both divide the business units or products into different categories based on
their performance.
Both are used to help a company make decisions about which areas of its
business to invest in and which to divest from.
Both are used to evaluate the company's portfolio of products, business units
or investments.
Both are based on the idea of analyzing the performance of a company's
different products or business units in order to identify those that are doing
well, those that need improvement, and those that should be divested.
BCG Matrix - General Electric Approach Difference
Assessing Growth Opportunities
The Strategic- Planning Gap
Ansoff Matrix
The Ansoff Matrix was originally developed by H. Igor Ansoff in 1957
Portfolio planning tool to analyze and plan their strategies for growth.