10 1016@j Psep 2020 05 020
10 1016@j Psep 2020 05 020
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: In recent years, microplastics (MPs) smaller than 100 m have been reported to be abundant in bulk
Received 18 February 2020 water samples from drinking water treatment plants (WTPs). In this study, the removal behavior of MPs
Received in revised form 27 April 2020 for different sizes (10–100 m), shape and surface morphology were investigated using alum coagulant
Accepted 11 May 2020
and alum combined with cationic polyamine-coated (PC) sand. For identification and quantification, MPs
Available online 17 May 2020
were stained with Nile Red dye and observed under a laser scanning fluorescent microscope. The removal
of MPs increases with increasing doses of alum up to 30 mg L–1 (70.7%). Further increases in the doses
Keywords:
resulted in a sharp decrease in the removal of MPs. The analysis for different sizes showed lower removal
Microplastics
Orthokinetic flocculation
of smaller MPs (10–30 m) for all doses of alum. PC sand (500 mg L–1 ) combined with 20 mg L–1 of alum
Cationic polyamine-coated sand dose showed the highest removal (92.7%) of MPs. The removal was enhanced by 26.8% when compared
Physical characteristic with alum alone. The removal of MPs followed the behavior of elongated-rough (ER) > elongated-smooth
Fluorescent technology (ES) > spherical-rough (SR) > spherical-smooth (SS) and was supported by a flocculation kinetic study.
This study revealed that size, shape and surface morphology of MPs play important roles in the removal
of MPs from drinking WTPs.
© 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction use of plastics. These discarded plastics are very difficult to remove
once they have entered the aquatic environment (Shim et al., 2016).
The tiny particles of plastic less than 5 mm are defined as MPs are heterogeneous in nature which differ in size, shape
microplastics (MPs) (Cole et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2018; Di and Wang, and chemical composition. MPs with different compositions have
2018) and can be divided into two categories based on their ori- been detected and identified in aquatic environments, including
gin, primary MPs and secondary MPs. Primary MPs are larger than MPs such as acrylics, polyamides, polyesters, polyethylenes (PE),
2.5 mm and are defined as MPs originally manufactured from the polypropylenes (PP) and polystyrenes (Di et al., 2018; Pivokonsky
raw plastic materials and contained in textiles, medicines, cosmet- et al., 2018; Lei et al., 2018). Different plastics have their own chem-
ics, blasting media, cleaning products, personal care products such ical compositions and polymer additives. The additives that are
as facial products and body scrubs, among others (Andrady, 2011; used are often composed of harmful substances which are very
Lambert and Wagner, 2018; Simon et al., 2018; Lee and Kim, 2018). hazardous (organic and heavy metal pollutants) to nature and may
Secondary MPs are MPs that are derived from larger fragments leach at very fast rates during the aging process of plastic debris
or large plastic debris of MPs by mechanical degradation, photo (Kowalski et al., 2016; Lei et al., 2018). However, depending on
or ultraviolet (UV) degradation, biodegradation, thermal-oxidative the physical, chemical and biological conditions of the receiving
degradation, hydrolysis and other mechanisms (Lin et al., 2018; Lee environments, the concentrations of leachable compounds vary
and Kim, 2018). Eriksen et al. (2013) reported that the majority of (Lambert and Wagner, 2018). The additives found in plastics are
MPs found in aquatic environments are of the secondary-MPs type polybrominated diphenyl ethers, phthalate and bisphenol A and
and would increase in abundance with increasing production and are known as endocrine disruptors that can mimic, compete with
and disrupt the synthesis of endocrine hormones. Besides this,
MPs are reported to act as excellent vectors or carriers of organic
pollutants and heavy metals which, upon ingestion, cause harm
∗ Corresponding author.
to aquatic organisms (Cole et al., 2011). Because of large surface
E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Dockko).
areas and strong hydrophobicity, MPs adsorb persistent organic
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.020
0957-5820/© 2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
10 N.K. Shahi et al. / Process Safety and Environmental Protection 141 (2020) 9–17
2.3. Characterization of MPs and PC sand meaning low solubility. A stock solution of 50 mg L–1 NR was there-
fore prepared in acetone and kept in an amber bottle at 4 ◦ C. The
The physical characteristics of MPs such as size, shape and sur- working solution of 5 mg L–1 was prepared by diluting the stock
face morphology were investigated through image analysis (see solution with n-hexane (10 times) and keeping it in a tightly sealed
Section 2.5). The size was measured based on Feret’s measurement amber bottle at 4 ◦ C. For staining, 5 mL of the supernatant was pipet-
(Fig. S1) where the longest distance between any points along the ted from the collected whole sample (after vigorous mixing) and
selected boundary is defined as Feret’s diameter (dF , m) and the filtered through a hydrophilic PCTE membrane filter. The collected
minimal Feret’s distance which is calculated after considering all MPs on the surface of the membrane filter were stained with 200 L
possible orientations from 0◦ to 180◦ is called the minimal Feret’s working NR solution. Then, the filter with the stained MPs was left
diameter (Min df , m) (Mazzoli and Favoni, 2012). The MPs were to air dry for 5 min and the measurements were carried out.
divided into different Min df size categories ranging from 10 to
100 m (10–30, 30–50, 50–70 and 70–100 m). The shape of the 2.5.2. Microscopic imaging
MPs was measured using the parameter, AR, which is defined as Imaging was performed using an upright confocal laser scanning
the ratio of the longest to shortest diameter (Li et al., 2018a), as microscope (CLSM) (LSM700, Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with
shown in the Eq. (1). The particles with AR value ranging from 1 to a high-resolution AxioCam microscope camera. The fluorescence
2.4 are considered to be spherical, from 2.4 to 5 are considered to measurement of the NR-stained MPs was performed at a mag-
be elongated (Sieving et al., 2003; Li et al., 2018a) and those with nification of 10× in green fluorescent protein with an excitation
AR values higher than 5 are considered to have fiber shapes. The wavelength of 488 nm and emission wavelength of 539 nm.
surface morphology of the MPs was measured based on the rough-
ness factor or the convexity of the particle which is defined as the
2.5.3. Image analysis
ratio of actual perimeter to the convex perimeter and is calculated
The particle recognition and quantification of the fluorescent
as shown in Eq. (2) (Janoo, 1998).
image of the MPs, based on their size, shape and surface mor-
dF phology, was carried out using ImageJ 1.8.0 (National Institutes of
AR = (1)
Min df Health, USA). The image analysis was carried out as per the steps
illustrated in Fig. S2 (available with the online version of this paper).
p
R= (2) The visualization of the image was carried out in the arrays of
pc 1024 × 1024 pixels resolution with a pixel size of 0.3 m2 . The cap-
where R is the roughness factor or convexity, p is the actual perime- tured images were exported in tagged image file format. Because
ter and pc is the convex perimeter in m of MPs. For smooth the captured images contained background noise, the image bright-
particles, R will approach the value of 1 and 0 for rough parti- ness and contrast were adjusted. Under this condition, the digitized
cles. Besides this, the zeta () potentials in mV of MPs, sand and PC images were binarized, i.e., converted to black and white with a gray
sand were measured using NanoPlus, a zeta/nanoparticle analyzer value of 256. This often helps to enhance the image features for
(ELSZ-1000, USA). visualization. The gray value of 256 needs to be processed in such
a way to allow quantification in reduced gray values. This process
2.4. Experimental setup for settling process can be accomplished with the process called thresholding in which
the values are reduced to 0 and 1 for black and white, respectively.
During the test, predetermined doses of coagulant and floccu- Finally, the measurements were taken, exported to a spreadsheet
lation additives were added. The coagulated water sample pH was file and interpreted.
adjusted to 7 by the addition of 0.1 mol L–1 NaOH and HCl. A jar test
was performed with rapid mixing (200 rpm) for 1 min, subsequent 2.6. Theory of coagulation and flocculation kinetics
slow mixing (50 rpm) for 10 min and settling for 30 min for coag-
ulation, flocculation and sedimentation, respectively. The removal As per the traditional colloid chemistry theory, i.e., Derjaguin,
efficiency of MPs was tested for alum doses of 10, 20, 30, 40 and Landau, Verwey and Overbeek, the potential is the primary fac-
50 mg L–1 respectively. To enhance the removal of MPs and opti- tor that affects the stability of the colloids/particles. However, the
mize the alum dose, the tests were conducted for 0.5, 1 and 2 mg L–1 shape, size and surface texture of colloids/particles in the water
cationic polyamine additive. The cationic polyamine additive was treatment process have much to do with their stability. Thus,
added immediately after rapid mixing. From this, the optimum dose the shape, size and surface texture factors of the MPs cannot be
of cationic polyamine from the above experiment was used to coat neglected. Particles with the same volume but with different mor-
the sand. The test was performed with different mass concentra- phology factors have different rate constants of coagulation and
tions of PC sand, i.e., 300, 400 and 500 mg L–1 . The turbidity was depend in their action diameter, i.e., dF . For both orthokinetic and
analyzed using a turbidity meter (TURBI200ND, Hach Co., USA). The prokinetic coagulation reactions, the morphology factors have a
DOC was analyzed with a total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-L, Shi- great impact on the reaction rate constants (Jiang and Guan, 2006).
madzu Co., Japan). UV254 was measured using a UV spectrometer In traditional theories, the particles are considered to be spher-
(DR5000, Hach Co., USA). ical. For MPs larger than 1 m the rate constant for the coagulation
reaction can be calculated as:
2.5. Identification and quantification of MPs kt = 2Min df G/3
3
(3)
2.5.1. Staining of MPs where kt (m3 s–1 ) is traditionally the orthokinetic rate constant and
The first and foremost step is the selection of the appropriate G (s–1 ) is the velocity gradient.
solvent to perform NR staining of the MP particles. Solvents such as The study conducted by Jiang and Guan (2006) showed that par-
ethyl acetate, acetonitrile, dichloromethane and toluene are found ticles with the same volume but with different shapes and surface
to degrade hydrophilic PCTE membrane filters, while methanol, morphologies displayed different rate constants for the coagulation
ethanol and cyclohexane cause decolorization of hydrophilic PCTE and flocculation reactions. Different shape and surface morphol-
membrane surfaces. The solvent n-hexane did not show any dam- ogy have different action radii. Because Eq. (3) does not provide for
age to the filters (Shim et al., 2016) but it did not dissolve the NR, shape and surface morphology factors, a volume expansion factor
12 N.K. Shahi et al. / Process Safety and Environmental Protection 141 (2020) 9–17
Fig. 2. potential value of sand, PS, PE and PC sand. Data for the PS from Dong et al.
(2020).
Fig. 4. Removal behavior of different size MPs for different doses of alum at pH
Fig. 3. Removal of MPs for different doses of alum at pH 7 ± 0.5 and temperature
7 ± 0.5 and temperature 20 ± 2 ◦ C. The size of the MPs is given in minimal Feret’s
20 ± 2 ◦ C.
diameter (Min df , m).
hydroxide precipitation may compete with the adsorption of incip- range of 30–50 m, followed by 70–100 m and 50–70 m. The
iently formed soluble aluminum(III) species (Stumm and O’Melia, MPs in the size range 10–30 m showed low removal, a result
1968; Sun et al., 2019). For this condition, sweep flocculation pre- which has also been found in previous research (Pivokonsky et al.,
dominates and facilitates the formation of bigger flocs. Although 2018). In addition, the abundance, or the concentration of the
the removal of MPs for 30 mg/L is high compared with other doses particles, affects the removal rate. However, a low particle con-
of alum, the removal efficiency is low. Further increases in the dose centration was observed for MPs in the size range of 50–70 m in
of alum, in particular at 50 mg L–1 , resulted in sharp decreases in the raw water and in contrast, the second-highest concentration was
removal rate. This might be attributed to the restabilization of the found after pretreatment with an alum dose of 10 mg L–1 . As per the
surface charge of the MPs because aluminum hydroxide precipita- orthokinetic reaction, the removal of the MPs must increase with
tion is not supposed to exceed the adsorption of incipiently formed increasing size and the results for the dose of 10 mg L–1 are not in
soluble alum species. However, the charge neutralization mecha- line with this theory. The dF affects the aggregation because in the
nism is supposed to be dominant for low doses of alum (0.5 mM, flow velocity gradient, the larger axis, i.e., the action diameter dF ,
i.e., 13.49 mg L–1 as Al) (Sun et al., 2019). The removal of MPs for always orientates itself toward the flow velocity’s direction (Jiang
10 mg L–1 and 50 mg L–1 showed no significant difference. Further, and Guan, 2006). The greater the value for dF , the greater will be the
from the potential value which was –14.2 mV for the MPs, the ratio between dF and Min df . This will lead to an increase in the rate
addition of the alum dose must lead to high coagulation and floc- constant for the orthokinetic flocculation reaction. As illustrated in
culation rates for MPs and facilitate their removal. However, the Fig. S7, the ratio of dF to Min df for MPs in the size range of 30–50 m
results obtained were not in line with the charge neutralization was found to be greater for almost all particles than for MPs of size
mechanism, which is explained in the sweep flocculation section 50–70 m. This may have caused the lower removal of 50–70 m
above. Although charge neutralization is the primary factor, partic- MPs.
ularly for low doses of alum, other factors such as size, shape and
surface morphology factor may have played important roles in the 3.2.3. Effect of shape and surface morphology on the removal
removal mechanisms. A previous study showed that besides charge behavior of MPs
neutralization, the shapes of the particles also affect the coagula- Fig. 5a. clearly shows the effect of the shape of MPs on their
tion and flocculation reaction kinetics (Jiang and Guan, 2006). The removal. Although the abundance of spherical MPs is almost three
shapes of the particles directly affect the force distribution that times higher than for elongated MPs in raw water, the removal of
surrounds them, which ultimately influences the coagulation and spherical MPs is lower for all alum doses than for the removal of
flocculation process. elongated MPs. As per the study conducted by Sun et al. (2019),
particles with higher concentrations showed higher removal per-
3.2.2. Effect of size on removal behavior of MPs centages than with lower concentrations. This might be because
As shown in Fig. 4 and Fig. S6, the removal of the MPs in of the similar shape characteristics of the particles. However, in
the smaller size range 10–30 m was observed to be the lowest. this study, different shape characteristics were found to have a
The highest removal of 52% was observed for 30 mg L–1 followed noticeable effect. With the increase in the alum dose, the removal
by 20 mg L–1 (48%). MPs in the size range 30–100 m were not of elongated-shape MPs sharply increased up to an alum dose of
detected for the 30 mg L–1 alum dose. For 20 mg L–1 , 40 mg L–1 and 20 mg L–1 . For the elongated-shape MPs, the maximum removal
50 mg L–1 , MPs in the size range 30–50 m were detected, and of 81.8% was observed for both 20 mg L–1 and 30 mg L–1 of alum
removal was found to be 83.3%. With the increase in the alum dose. Further increases in the dose to 40 mg L–1 resulted in a grad-
dose above 30 mg L–1 , a sharp decrease in the removal of MPs was ual decrease in the removal of the MPs to a point where the removal
observed, specifically for the smaller size range of 10–30 m. From remained stable. In contrast, the spherical-shape MPs showed a
the results, we observed that the removal of MPs increased with an gradual increase in removal of MPs with increasing doses up to
increase in the size for the higher dose of alum where sweep floccu- 30 mg L–1 . Further increases in alum dose showed a sharp decrease
lation is dominant. In contrast, for an alum dose of 10 mg L–1 where in the removal of MPs. The maximum removal of 66.7% was
charge neutralization is dominant for doses less than 13.49 mg L–1 observed for 30 mg L–1 alum, with the minimum removal of 33.3%
(0.5 mM as Al), the results show higher removal of MPs in the size for 50 mg L–1 . A possible reason for these results might be related to
14 N.K. Shahi et al. / Process Safety and Environmental Protection 141 (2020) 9–17
Table 2
Values of variables and constants for the coagulation and flocculation kinetics.
Fig. 6. Effect of shape and surface morphology of MPs on coagulation and floccula-
tion kinetics. (a) Modified orthokinetic rate constant (km ) vs traditional orthokinetic
rate constant (kt ) and (b) km with the same Min df and different shape and surface
morphology.
Fig. 8. Removal of MPs by PC sand. (a) Different sizes, (b) different shapes and
(c) shapes combined with surface morphology at pH 7 ± 0.5, temperature 20 ± 2 ◦ C
and alum 20 mg L–1 . SS is spherical-smooth, SR is spherical-rough, ES is elongated-
Fig. 7. Removal of MPs for different doses of PC sand combined with alum (20 and smooth, and ER is elongated-rough.
30 mg L–1 ) at pH 7 ± 0.5 and temperature 20 ± 2 ◦ C.
400 and 500 mg L–1 of PC sand (Figs. 8a and S10). The MPs detected References
were in the range of 10–30 m. For smaller MPs in the size range
of 10–30 m, the removal was enhanced by 40% with the addi- Andrady, A.L., 2011. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62,
1596–1605, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.030.
tion of 500 mg L–1 PC sand. The removal achieved was 88% for Ashton, K., Holmes, L., Turner, A., 2010. Association of metals with plastic production
the smaller MPs. This might be because of strong attractive forces pellets in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 2050–2055, http://dx.
between negatively charged MPs and positively charged PC sand. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.07.014.
Ayekoe, C.Y.P., Robert, D., Gone, L.D., 2017. Combination of coagulation-flocculation
This leads to the attachment of the MPs to the surface of the sand. and heterogeneous photocatalysis for improving the removal of humic sub-
Further, the polymer resulted in the bridging between MPs and stances in real treated water from Agbôriver (Ivory-Coast). Catal. Today 281,
sand, making agglomeration strong, compact and heavier. Here, the 2–13, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.024.
Bai, R., Tien, C., 1997. Particle detachment in deep bed filtration. J. Colloid Interface
PC sand acts as a collector, which collects negatively charged MPs Sci. 186, 307–317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.4663.
and flocs present. Further investigations were carried out based on Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., Galloway, T.S., 2011. Microplastics as contam-
the shape of the MPs. As illustrated in Fig. 8b, both 400 mg L–1 and inants in the marine environment: a review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 2588–2597,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025.
500 mg L–1 PC sand showed significant increases in the removal of Di, M., Wang, J., 2018. Microplastics in surface waters and sediments of the three
elongated MPs. For spherical MPs, the removal was not significantly Gorges Reservoir, China. Sci. Total Environ. 616-617, 1620–1627, http://dx.doi.
higher for 400 mg L–1 PC sand than with alum alone. The removal org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.150.
Dong, C.D., Chen, C.W., Chen, Y.C., Chen, H.H., Lee, J.S., Lin, C.H., 2020. Polystyrene
of spherical MPs was increased by around 7% for 400 mg L–1 PC
microplastic particles: In vitro pulmonary toxicity assessment. J. Hazard. Mater.
sand. However, the removal of spherical MPs for 500 mg L–1 PC 385, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121575.
sand increased significantly. The removal was increased by 30% and Eriksen, M., Mason, S., Wilson, S., Box, C., Zellers, A., Edwards, W., Farley, H., Amato, S.,
found to be 90%. On the other hand, for the PC sand 500 mg L–1 test, 2013. Microplastic pollution in the surface waters of the Laurentian great lakes.
Mar. Pollut. Bull. 77, 177–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.
elongated MPs were not detected, and the removal was increased 007.
by around 18% compared with alum alone. Besides this, surface Hassas, B.V., Caliskan, H., Guven, O., Karakas, F., Cinar, M., Celik, M.S., 2016. Effect of
morphology is another factor that affects the coagulation and floc- roughness and shape factor on flotation characteristics of glass beads. Colloids
Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 492, 88–99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.
culation. There was significant removal of rough MPs compared 2015.12.025.
with smooth. Rough MPs were not detected for 500 mg L–1 PC sand Hüffer, T., Weniger, A., Hofmann, T., 2018. Sorption of organic compounds by aged
combined with alum. On the other hand, the removal was observed polystyrene microplastic particles. Environ. Pollut. 236, 218–225, http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.022.
to be 85.7% for smooth MPs. The removal was increased by around Ivleva, N.P., Wiesheu, A.C., Niessner, R., 2017. Microplastic in aquatic ecosystems.
25%. From the above results, the bridging mechanism is predomi- Angew. Chem. Int. 56, 1720–1739, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201606957.
nant for rough particles, as compared with smooth particles. Thus, Janoo, V., Special Report 98–1 Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
1998. Quantification of Shape, Angularity and Surface Texture of Base Course
to understand this, the combined effect of shape and surface mor- Materials. US Army Corps of Engineers, Hanover, NH https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/
phology was investigated, and the results are shown in Fig. 8c. For view/dot/14065.
PC sand 500 mg L–1 , no MPs other than SS MPs were detected. When Jiang, Z., Guan, Y., 2006. Flocculation morphology: effect of particulate shape and
coagulant species on flocculation. Water Sci. Technol. 53, 9–16, http://dx.doi.
compared with alum alone, the removal of SS MPs was enhanced
org/10.2166/wst.2006.202.
by around 27% and found to be 80%. From this, it can be concluded Khetan, S.K., Collins, T.J., 2007. Human pharmaceuticals in aquatic environment: a
that the surface morphology plays an important role in bridging, challenge to green chemistry. Chem. Rev. 107, 2319–2364, http://dx.doi.org/10.
interception and agglomeration of particles. 1021/cr020441w.
Kowalski, N., Reichardt, A.M., Waniek, J.J., 2016. Sinking rates of microplastics and
potential implications of their alteration by physical, biological, and chemical
4. Conclusion factors. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 109, 310–319, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.
2016.05.064.
Lambert, S., Wagner, M., 2018. Microplastics are contaminants of emerging con-
The removal behavior of MPs, using common coagulants in cern in freshwater environment: an overview. In: Wagner, M., Lambert, S. (Eds.),
drinking WTPs, was investigated. To improve the removal of MPs, Freshwater Microplastics, Hdb. Env. Chem. Springer, pp. 1–23, 58.
Lee, H., Kim, Y., 2018. Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage
cationic PC sand was used and studied. The removal of MPs using treatment facilities in Korea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 137, 1–8, http://dx.doi.org/10.
alum only was found to be in the average range. However, PC sand 1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.050.
combined with alum significantly enhanced the removal of MPs Lei, L., Wu, S., Lu, S., Liu, M., Song, Y., Fu, Z., Shi, H., Raley-Susman, K.M., He, D.,
2018. Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects
by 26.8% compared with alum alone. In addition, with the addi-
in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Total Environ.
tion of PC sand, the alum dose was reduced by 50%. Further, results 619-620, 1–8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.103.
obtained based on MPs’ physical characteristics such as size, shape Leslie, H.A., Brandsma, S.H., van Velzen, M.J.M., Vethaak, A.D., 2017. Microplastic-
and surface morphology showed noticeable effects on coagulation sen route: field measurements in the Dutch river delta and Amsterdam canals,
wastewater treatment plants, North Sea sediments and biota. Environ. Int. 101,
and flocculation processes. The MPs with small-smooth-spherical 133–142, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.01.018.
characteristics showed low removal by both alum and alum com- Li, J., Wang, K., Li, Z., Tu, J.P., Jin, G., Su, J., Zhai, B., 2018a. Mechanical tests, wear
bined with PC sand. simulation and wear particle analysis of carbon-based nanomultilayer coatings
on Ti6 Al4 V alloys as hip protheses. RCS Adv. 8, 6849–6857.
Li, J., Liu, H., Chen, J.P., 2018b. Microplastics in freshwater systems: A review on
Declaration of competing interest occurrence, environmental effects, and methods of microplastics detection.
Water Res. 137, 362–374, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056.
Lin, L., Zuo, L.Z., Peng, J.P., Cai, L.Q., Fok, L., Yan, Y., Li, H.X., Xu, X.R., 2018. Occurrence
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. and distribution of microplastics in an urban river: A case study in the Pearl
River along Guanghou City, China. Sci. Total Environ. 644, 375–381, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.327.
Acknowledgement Liu, G., Zhu, Z., Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Yu, F., Ma, J., 2019. Sorption behavior and mechanism
of hydrophilic organic chemicals to virgin and aged microplastics in freshwa-
This research study is supported by National Research Founda- ter and sweater. Environ. Pollut. 246, 26–33, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.
2018.11.100.
tion (NRF-2018R1A2B2003059). Luo, W., Su, L., Craig, N.J., Du, F., Wu, C., Shi, H., 2019. Comparison of microplastic
pollution in different water bodies from urban creeks to coastal waters. Environ.
Pollut. 246, 174–182, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.081.
Appendix A. Supplementary data Ma, B., Xue, W., Ding, Y., Hu, C., Liu, H., Qu, J., 2019a. Removal characteristics of
microplastics by Fe-based coagulants during drinking water treatment. J. Envi-
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in ron. Sci. China 78, 267–275, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.10.006.
Ma, B., Xue, W., Hu, C., Liu, H., Qu, J., Li, L., 2019b. Characteristics of microplastic
the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.
removal via coagulation and ultrafiltration during drinking water treatment.
020. Chem. Eng. J. 359, 159–167, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.155.
N.K. Shahi et al. / Process Safety and Environmental Protection 141 (2020) 9–17 17
Mazzoli, A., Favoni, O., 2012. Particle size, size distribution and morphological Sieving, A., Wu, B., Mayton, L., Nasser, S., Wooley, P.H., 2003. Morphological
evaluation of airborne dust particles of diverse woods by Scanning Electron characteristics of total joint arthroplasty-derived ultra-high molecular weight
microscopy and image processing program. Power Technol. 225, 65–71, http:// polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris that provoke inflammation in a murine
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.033. model of inflammation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 64, 457–464, http://dx.doi.org/
McCormick, A.R., Hoellein, T.J., London, M.G., Hittie, J., Scott, J.W., Kelly, J.J., 2016. 10.1002/jbm.a.10368.
Microplastic in surface waters of urban rivers: concentration, sources, and asso- Silva, A.B., Bostos, A.S., Justino, C.I.L., da Costa, J.P., Duarte, A.C., Rocha-Santos, T.A.P.,
ciated bacterial assemblages. Ecosphere 7, e01556, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ 2018. Microplastics in the environment: Challenges in analytical chemistry -
ecs2.1556. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 1017, 1–19, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.
Mintenig, S.M., Löder, M.G.J., Primpke, S., Gerdts, G., 2019. Low number of microplas- 043.
tics detected in drinking water from ground water sources. Sci. Total Environ. Simon, M., Alst, N.V., Vollertsen, J., 2018. Quantification of microplastic mass and
648, 631–635, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.178. removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying Focal Plane Array (FPA)-
Mizukawa, K., Takada, H., Ito, M., Geok, Y.B., Hosoda, J., Yamashita, R., Saha, M., based Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) imaging. Water Res. 142, 1–9, http://
Suzuki, S., Miguez, C., Frias, J., Antunes, J.C., Sobral, P., Santos, I., Micaelo, C., dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.019.
Ferreira, A.M., 2013. Monitoring of a wide range of organic micropollutants on Stumm, W., O’Melia, C.R., 1968. Stoichiometry of coagulation. J. Am. Water Works
the Portuguese coast using plastic resin pellets. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 70, 296–302, Assoc. 60, 514–539 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41265308.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.02.008. Su, L., Xue, Y., Li, L., Yang, D., Kolandhasamy, P., Li, D., Shi, H., 2016. Microplastics
Ngo, H.H., Vigneswaran, S., Dharmappa, H.B., 1995. Optimization of direct filtration: in Taihu Lake, China. Environ. Pollut. 216, 711–719, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
experiments and mathematical models. Environ. Technol. 16, 55–63, http://dx. envpol.2016.06.036.
doi.org/10.1080/09593331608616245. Sun, H., Jiao, R., Xu, H., An, G., Wang, D., 2019. The influence of particle size and
Pivokonsky, M., Bubakova, P., Pivokonska, L., Hnatukova, P., 2011. The effect of global concentration combined with pH on coagulation mechanisms. J. Environ. Sci.
velocity gradient on the character and filterability of aggregates formed during China 82, 39–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2019.02.021.
the coagulation/ flocculation process. Environ. Technol. 32, 1355–1366, http:// Triebskorn, R., Braunbeck, T., Grummt, T., Hanslik, L., Huppertsberg, S., Jekel, M.,
dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2010.536786. Knepper, T.P., Krais, S., Müller, Y.K., Pittroff, M., Ruhl, A.S., Schmieg, H., Schür,
Pivokonsky, M., Cermakova, L., Novotna, K., Peer, P., Cajthaml, T., Janda, V., 2018. C., Strobel, C., Wagner, M., Zumbülte, N., Köhler, H.R., 2019. Relevance of nano–
Occurrence of microplastics in raw and treated drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. and microplastics for freshwater ecosystems: a critical review. Trac-Trends Anal.
643, 1644–1651, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.102. Chem. 110, 375–392, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.023.
Razanajatovo, R.M., Ding, J., Zhang, S., Jiang, H., Zou, H., 2018. Sorption and des- Wang, W., Ndungu, A.W., Li, Z., Wang, J., 2017. Microplastics pollution in inland
orption of selected pharmaceuticals by polyethylene microplastics. Mar. Pollut. freshwaters of China: A case study in urban surface waters of Wuhan, China.
Bull. 136, 516–523, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.048. Sci. Total Environ. 575, 1369–1374, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.
Shen, M., Song, B., Zhu, Y., Zeng, G., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Wen, X., Chen, M., Yi, H., 2020. 09.213.
Removal of microplastics vis drinking water treatment: Current knowledge and Wang, W., Yuan, W., Chen, Y., Wang, J., 2018. Microplastics in surface waters of
future directions. Chemosphere 251, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. Dongting Lake and Hong Lake, China. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 539–545, http://
2020.126612. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.211.
Shim, W.J., Song, Y.K., Hong, S.H., Jang, M., 2016. Identification and quantification of World Health Organization, 2003. Acrylamide in Drinking-water: Background Doc-
microplsatics using Nile Red staining. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 113, 469–479, http://dx. ument for Development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. World
doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.049. Health Organization https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75373.