e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi

p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

Rahayu, S. A. T. & Caninsti, R. (2024). The Role of Smartphone Addiction on Bed Procrastination
and Mindful Eating Behavior in Adolescents. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 9(1). 1-13. doi:
https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v9i1.2804

The Role of Smartphone Addiction on

Bed Procrastination and Mindful Eating Behavior in Adolescents

Syiffa Azahra Tri Rahayu1, Riselligia Caninsti2*

Faculty of Psychology, Universitas YARSI1,2

Submitted: 10 October 2023 Accepted: 14 November 2023 Published: 31 March 2024

Abstract. Excessive smartphone use causes the behavior of delaying bedtime and decreasing mindful
eating in teenagers. The aim of this research is to find out and explain how much the risk of smartphone
addiction plays a role in increasing bed procrastination behavior and decreasing mindful eating in
adolescents. There were 192 participants involved in the research with the sampling technique used was
convenience sampling. Participant characteristics include teenagers aged 18 – 21 years and have a cut off
score for smartphone addiction. Each participant filled out the Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version
for Adolescents, Bedtime Procrastination Scale, and Mindful Eating Questionnaire questionnaires. Data
were analyzed using a simple regression method. Based on the results of the regression test, it was found
that the risk of smartphone addiction played a 6.1% role in increasing bed procrastination behavior
and a 13.3% role in reducing mindful eating behavior. The results of this study also found other factors
that play a role in procrastination behavior at bedtime and mindful eating in teenagers besides excessive
smartphone use. Therefore, it is hoped that future research will be able to consider and look at other factors
besides the risk of smartphone addiction that play a role in bed procrastination and mindful eating.

Keywords: adolescents; bed procratination; mindful eating; smartphone addiction

INTRODUCTION

Technological advances in this era lighten the burden of most human activities. This
condition impacts lifestyle changes, especially healthy lifestyles for teenagers. Behavioral changes
easily found in daily life are related to sleeping and eating behavior. Today's teenagers who grow
up amidst technological developments tend to sleep less than the recommended sleep duration for
their age and display unhealthy eating behavior, such as eating in a hurry, consuming much fast
food, and not being aware of the amount of food or calories consumed.
Research studies conducted by Kroese et al. (2016) related to changes in the sleep
behavior of teenagers found that modern society, especially teenagers, tends to delay bedtime or
bed procrastination with a prevalence of 53.1%. Kroese et al. (2014) defined delayed sleep time
or bed procrastination as a behavior characterized by delayed sleep time and sleepless behavior
experienced by a person and is not caused by interference from external factors. Kroese et al. (2014)
said there are three characteristics of bed procrastination: experiencing insufficient sleep, hours of
sleep, and fatigue during the day. Experienced insufficient sleep or the experience of lack of sleep
is a characteristic of bed procrastination when individuals feel that they do not have enough or
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Rahayu & Caninsti | 1

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

maximum sleep time. Hours of sleep include factors related to how much time an individual spends
sleeping. Meanwhile, fatigue during the day is related to how often individuals feel tired when
doing activities.
Bed procrastination behavior has an influence on reducing adolescents' ability to fulfill
physiological needs, one of which is sleep (Grandner, 2017). Sleep plays a vital role in the
development of cognitive function in adolescents. It is closely related to increasing cortical activity,
oxygen in the body, and the release of epinephrine (Syamsoedin et al., 2015). The Suni an Vyas
(2023) explained that the recommended sleep duration or time for teenagers is 8 to 10 hours
in 1 day. However, Keyes et al. (2015) found that today's teenagers have experienced a decrease
in sleep duration, namely less than 7 hours a day. Meanwhile, teenagers who sleep less than the
recommended ideal duration or cannot meet their sleep needs tend to experience health problems
related to sleep behavior (Trihono et al., 2013). Not only that, teenagers with a high level of bed
procrastination will usually postpone other activities, disrupting daily activities due to drowsiness,
laziness, and lack of focus during activities (Kroese et al., 2014).
Apart from impacting changes in sleep behavior or the emergence of bed procrastination,
there are also changes in the eating behavior of teenagers who have grown up in the digital era.
This change in eating behavior refers to the decline in mindful eating in adolescents. Mindful
eating is defined as a technique of paying full attention to eating behavior, which is characterized
by not judging all forms of internal and external cues that influence the desire to eat, the type
of food chosen, the amount of food consumed, and how to consume food (Hanh & Cheung,
2010). Internal cues in mindful eating behavior relate to signals of hunger and fullness (Kristeller
& Wolever, 2010), while external cues relate to how much food is served and the environment in
which eating behavior occurs (Wansink, 2004). According to Framson et al. (2009), mindful eating
has five dimensions, namely Disinhibition (the ability to realize when individuals have difficulty
controlling themselves when eating), Awareness (individuals can be fully aware of the shape, taste,
and aroma of food), External cues (the individual can realize that external influences influence his
eating behavior), Emotional response (the individual realizes that emotional impulses influence his
eating behavior), and Distraction (the individual realizes that there are things that interfere with his
eating behavior).
Today's teenagers tend not to show mindful eating behavior but instead display mindless
eating behavior. Mindless eating can occur when the behavior or desire to eat is not driven by
hunger signals or the need to fulfill nutrition but by external cues such as family, friends, the
color of food, the shape of the food, or the amount of food served. Not only that, but activities
considered to be a distraction to eating behavior can also trigger mindless eating behavior (Bahl et
al., 2013).
This change in behavior or healthy lifestyle is caused, in part, by excessive use of smartphones.
In this era of modern developments, followed by the development of digital technology, teenagers
are considered the most significant group who use smartphones. This is proven by examples of
teenagers' behavior when they spend their free time, namely playing with smartphones. Teenagers
use smartphones for online shopping, playing games, watching YouTube, and surfing social media.
This statement is in line with the results of research conducted by Andriani et al. (2019) that as
many as 51.1% of teenagers in Indonesia use their smartphones for 3 - 5 hours, and another 22.2%
use smartphones for a longer duration, namely more than 6 hours in one day. Gökçearslan et al.
(2016) stated in their research that the duration of smartphone use can influence smartphone
addiction behavior risk.
Smartphone addiction is a compulsive or problematic behavior indicated by an individual's

2 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

inability to regulate and control smartphone use, as well as an increase in the duration of its use
(Lin et al., 2014, 2016). Addiction to smartphones will have an impact on the emergence of health
problems such as nerve, ear, eye, and sleep disorders (Mawitjere et al., 2017). Not only that, excessive
use of smartphones and leading to risky behavior for smartphone addiction also has an impact on
the emergence of bed procrastination (Demirci et al., 2015) and mindless eating behavior (Alosaimi
et al., 2016).
A study of adolescents in 8 countries proved that 75% of the participants stated that they
always took their smartphone to bed and chose to delay their bedtime at night to use it (Duerson,
2012). The behavior of delaying bedtime (bed procrastination) is caused by the emergence of
teenagers' desire to continually use smartphones, such as accessing social media, playing games,
etc. It does not stop there. Research conducted in 2019 also showed that as many as 63% of
teenage participants slept less than 7 hours a day. This behavior is caused by teenagers' desire to
continuously use smartphones, even though it is time to sleep or rest at night (Keswara et al., 2019).
Thus, the bed procrastination phenomenon commonly experienced by teenagers is caused by the
desire to play on smartphones continuously.
Not only does it impact the emergence of bed procrastination behavior, but excessive
smartphone use in teenagers also increases mindless eating behavior. One of the causes of mindless
eating behavior is using a smartphone while eating is in progress. Adolescents distracted by
smartphone exposure while eating will reduce the quality of mindful eating, which is indicated by
an increase in the amount of energy and fat consumed by 15%. In addition, using a smartphone
while eating causes individuals to experience decreased focus on ongoing eating activities. Finally,
teenagers who continue to use smartphones at mealtimes tend not to pay attention to the amount
of food and the type of food they consume (Gonçalves et al., 2019).
Research regarding the risks of smartphone addiction is essential for further investigation,
primarily when the addictive behavior is associated with healthy behaviors such as sleeping and
eating. Moreover, the number of teenagers using smartphones is increasing, and there has not been
much research discussing smartphone use and procrastination behavior at bedtime and mindful
eating in teenagers. Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) (2014) explained that
adolescence is a period of individual development from childhood to adulthood and requires
maximum nutritional intake to support its development. Individuals in the teenage age range must
fulfill their sleep needs through adequate sleep (Jenco, 2016). Adolescents also need appropriate and
balanced nutritional intake to help with physical growth and development in other aspects (Hafiza
et al., 2020). Previous research by Keswara et al. (2019) found a relationship between smartphone
usage behavior and sleep quality in teenagers. The research results show that the decline in sleep
quality is caused by teenagers choosing not to go to bed on time and to play on smartphones.
Research conducted by Stanszus et al. (2019) proved that using a smartphone while eating can cause
weight gain in teenagers due to excessive food consumption. Teenagers who continue to use cell
phones while eating can be judged to have smartphone addiction (Stanszus et al., 2019). Decreased
focus/concentration due to distraction while eating is in progress is one of the characteristics that
they have experienced smartphone addiction (Örnek & Gündoğmuş, 2022).
The explanation of the phenomenon above proves that the risk of smartphone addiction
plays a role in the emergence of unhealthy behavior related to sleeping and eating behavior. For this
reason, researchers will test two hypotheses as a temporary answer regarding the role of smartphone
addiction risk on bed procrastination and mindful eating behavior in adolescents. The hypothesis of
this research is formulated as follows: H1: The risk of smartphone addiction has a significant role in
increasing bed procrastination behavior in adolescents; H2: The risk of smartphone addiction has a

Rahayu & Caninsti | 3

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

significant role in decreasing mindful eating behavior in adolescents,

METHOD

The type of this research is qualitative research. Watson (2015) explained quantitative
research as a type of research carried out to analyze a phenomenon using numerical data that is
processed statistically. Then, the type of research used is associative to look at the role (Jhangiani et
al., 2019) of the risk of smartphone addiction on bed procrastination and mindful eating behavior
in adolescents. The research population was late adolescents in Indonesia with the late adolescent
age range proposed by Monks et al. (2002), namely 18 – 21 years. Convenience sampling was used
for this research, and 192 samples of late adolescents were obtained. All participants expressed their
willingness to participate in the research and were willing to fill out the questionnaire given online
via Google Forms.
This research uses the Bedtime Procrastination Scale (BPS) measurement tool (Kroese et al.,
2014), which experts have translated into Indonesian to measure the bed procrastination variable.
The Bedtime Procrastination Scale has nine items with 5 Likert scales as answer choices, namely 1
(never) and 5 (always). The BPS measuring instrument has several unfavorable items: items 2, 3,
7, and 9. The total score obtained from the BPS measuring instrument is 9 – 45; the higher the
score, the higher the individual's procrastination during sleep. Furthermore, the reliability testing
technique used is Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency method. The results of the reliability test
show that the Bedtime Procrastination Scale measuring instrument has a high-reliability value of
0.678 with a confidence level of 95%. One example of an item in the Bedtime Procrastination
measuring tool is "I still do other activities when it is time to sleep."
The mindful eating variable was measured using an instrument compiled by Framson et
al. (2009), the Mindful Eating Questionnaire, which was translated into Indonesian by experts.
The MEQ measuring tool comprises five factors: disinhibition, awareness, external cues, emotional
response, and distraction. MEQ consists of 28 items with 4 Likert scales. There are several
unfavorable items in the MEQ measuring tool, namely item numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 16, 17, 18,
19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28. The higher the average score, the better the mindful
eating behavior displayed by the individual. Based on the reliability test using Cronbach's Alpha
results, it can be explained that the Mindful Eating Questionnaire measuring instrument has high
reliability with a reliability coefficient of 0.737, and the reliability coefficient of each dimension is
in the range of 0.625 - 0.755. An example of an item in the Mindful Eating Questionnaire is, "If
there is delicious food at an event, I will continue to eat that food even though I am full."
This research uses a measuring instrument belonging to Kwon et al. (2013), the Smartphone
Addiction Scale Short Version for Adolescents (SAS-SV), translated into Indonesian, to measure
smartphone addiction variables. The SAS-SV for Adolescents comprises ten items with a 6-point
Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree). The total score range for the SAS-SV
for Adolescents is 10 – 60 points. The higher the total score obtained, the higher the individual's
risk of smartphone addiction. Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency is used to test the reliability
of the SAS-SV measuring instrument. The reliability test results prove that the SAS-SV measuring
instrument has a high-reliability coefficient, namely 0.796. One of the items in the SAS-SV for
Adolescents measuring tool is "When using a smartphone, I neglect work that I should have
completed."
Furthermore, a simple regression test is the statistical method used to analyze research data.
A simple regression test is carried out to analyze data statistically on one independent variable and

4 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

one dependent variable to predict the value of the dependent variable (Y = Bed Procrastination and
Mindful Eating) based on the value of the independent variable (X = Smartphone Addiction) and
carrying out significance testing the role of independent variables in a regression equation (Smadi
& Abu-Afouna, 2012). In this study, the simple regression test was carried out twice because this
study tested two dependent variables with one independent variable, namely a simple regression
test on the variable bed procrastination on smartphone addiction and a simple regression test on
the variables mindful eating and smartphone addiction.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Based on the participant data collection process, 192 late adolescents in

Indonesia participated and filled out the questionnaire. Table 1 shows that most
participants are women (75%), have more than 4 hours of smartphone usage outside
of study, school, and work (95%), and the average age of participants is 19.71 years.

Table 1.
Research Demographic Data
Variable Total %
Gender
Male 48 25%
Female 144 75%
Age (mean= 19,71) 192 100%
Smartphone usage duration
outside of study, school, and
≥ 4 Hours 183 95%
< 4 Hours 9 5%

Furthermore, Table 2 shows that the 192 participants involved in the study were classified
as having a high risk of smartphone addiction when viewed based on the cut-off score from the
SAS-SV for Adolescents.

Table 2.
Categorization of SAS-SV Scores for Adolescents
Gender Cut Off Score Total Mean Indication
Male ≥31 48 41.77 High risk of smartphone addiction
Female ≥33 144 41.76 High risk of smartphone addiction

Table 3 shows that all participant data in each measuring instrument is normally distributed
(p> 0.05).
Table 3.
Normality Test Results
Absolute Asymp.Sig. (2-tailed)
SAS-SV with BPS 0.058 0.200
SAS-SV with MEQ 0.056 0.200

Rahayu & Caninsti | 5

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

The next stage is testing the linearity assumption. Table 4 contains the results of the linearity test
using the ANOVA test, proving that all research power is linear (p< 0.05).

Table 4.
Linearity Test Results
Variable F Sig
SAS-SV with BPS 11.419 < 0.001
SAS-SV with MEQ 26.952 < 0.001

Next, table 5 shows the results of the simple regression analysis to test the research
hypothesis. Hypothesis testing was carried out because this research met the assumption test.

Table 5.
Hypothesis Test Analysis Results
No Variabel R2 B p Significance
Eksogen Endogen
1 Smartphone addiction Bed procrastination 0.061 0.110 < 0.001 Significant
2 Smartphone addiction Mindful Eating 0.133 -0.275 < 0.001 Significant

Based on the results of hypothesis testing using regression analysis in Table 5, it is proven that
smartphone addiction risk behavior plays a significant role in all endogenous variables measured in
this study, namely bed procrastination and mindful eating. The results of the regression analysis show
that risk behavior for smartphone addiction plays a positive role in increasing procrastination during
sleep. Apart from that, this research also succeeded in proving that smartphone addiction risk behavior
plays a negative role in reducing mindful eating behavior. Smartphone addiction risk behavior has
a significant role of 6.1% in increasing procrastination behavior during sleep. Second, smartphone
addiction risk behavior has a significant role of 13.3% in decreasing mindful eating behavior.
Smartphone addiction behavior is defined as a behavior characterized by compulsive
behavior and a person's inability to regulate or control smartphone use, as well as experiencing
an increase in the duration of its use (Lin et al., 2014, 2016). One of the problems
caused by the risk of smartphone addiction is problems with sleep behavior (Mawitjere
et al., 2017). These sleep problems are caused by increased bed procrastination behavior
due to individuals experiencing the risk of smartphone addiction (Demirci et al., 2015).
Research conducted by Jarmi and Rahayuningsih (2017) explained further the risk of
smartphone addiction in increasing procrastination during sleep. His research explained that
teenagers who use smartphones before bed could make the RAS (Reticular et al.) system, which is
responsible for regulating sleep in the brain center, active again. The activation of the RAS system
results from stimuli emitted by smartphones, such as sound, vibration, and light, making it difficult
for teenagers to start sleeping. Lam (2014) stated in his research that teenagers who actively use
smartphones excessively are always associated with the emergence of procrastination behavior at
bedtime at night when it is time to sleep. This can happen because the risk of smartphone addiction
can make teenagers focus more on something that is considered fun for them, namely smartphones.
Then, ignoring sleep time to use or play with smartphones (Pandey et al., 2019).
The results of this study are in line with previous findings regarding the impact of the risk of
smartphone addiction on the emergence of bed procrastination behavior. Research conducted on
521 students in China revealed that as many as 96.08% of participants had the habit of using

6 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

smartphones before going to bed, and 71.90% of them preferred to continue using and playing
smartphones after 23.00 at night (Geng et al., 2021). Not only that, in 2019, there was a study that
found that 12% of 815 teenage participants chose to continue using smartphones for 3 – 5 hours
in the middle of the night rather than using the night time to sleep and rest (Rod et al., 2018). The
results of this study further strengthen the results of this study and prove that the risk of smartphone
addiction experienced by teenagers plays a role in increasing bed procrastination behavior.
Previous studies have explained that bed procrastination behavior is closely related to
smartphone addiction risk behavior. This is supported by research conducted by Kroese et al.
(2016) that the risk of smartphone addiction can make individuals experience an unwillingness to
stop activities seeking pleasure via their smartphone and have an impact on decreasing motivation
to sleep at night. Geng et al. (2021) said something similar that individuals will tend to delay their
bedtime for more time to relax and entertain themselves by playing with their smartphones. Not
only that, according to the results of research conducted by Chung et al. (2020), teenagers who are
in the high bed procrastination category tend to spend more time using smartphones for more than
7 hours a day, including 3 hours before bedtime, even the duration of smartphone use will increase
as it approaches bedtime. Sleep. This is in line with the factors that cause the emergence of bed
procrastination. Namely, using electronic media such as smartphones can cause individuals to delay
their sleep (Gradisar et al., 2013). Thus, it can be concluded that teenagers procrastinate at bedtime
due to the desire to use smartphones, which are considered a source of online pleasure.
Furthermore, the risk of smartphone addiction also has a significant role of 13.3% in re-
ducing mindful eating behavior in teenagers. Gonçalves et al. (2019) explained in their research
that using a smartphone while eating has an impact on reducing mindful eating and is followed
by an increase in the amount of calorie intake into the body by 15%, as well as excessive fat
consumption. This happens because teenagers continue to use their smartphones while eating,
making it difficult or even impossible to realize how much food they have consumed because
they are too focused on their smartphones. They also prefer to skip meals to play on their smart-
phones or choose to eat fast food, which is more practical. This is what ultimately makes the eat-
ing behavior of teenagers addicted to smartphones change to mindless eating (Kartal & Ayhan,
2021). Mindless eating can occur when the behavior or desire to eat is not driven by hunger sig-
nals or the need to fulfill nutrition but by external cues such as family, friends, the color of food,
the shape of the food, or the amount of food served. Not only that, but activities considered to
be a distraction to eating behavior can also trigger mindless eating behavior (Bahl et al., 2013).
Furthermore, disinhibition is associated with each dimension of mindful eating, a
condition when an individual realizes he cannot control himself. At the same time, eating ac-
tivities occur (Framson et al., 2009). The results of this research are research studies con-
ducted by Ogden et al. (2013) and Dohle et al. (2018), which prove that using a smartphone
while eating will make it difficult for individuals to realize when they cannot control the food
they consume. Also, using smartphones, which has become a lifestyle and habit for teenag-
ers, may affect their ability to remain aware when they have overeaten (Andriani et al., 2019).
The second dimension in mindful eating, namely awareness, can also be linked based
on research results, proving that smartphone addiction's risk plays a role in decreasing mind-
ful eating. According to Framson et al. (2009), the awareness dimension relates to how teen-
agers can give full attention and awareness to their food's shape, taste, texture, and aro-
ma. The results of this study are and can provide new evidence from a study conducted
by Moray et al. (2007) and Oldham-Cooper et al. (2011), who stated that using a smartphone
while eating can reduce awareness of food, eating situations, and the amount consumed.
Then, the risk of smartphone addiction, which plays a role in reducing mindful eat-

Rahayu & Caninsti | 7

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

ing, can also be interpreted as being able to reduce the external cues dimension in mind-
ful eating. Several external factors that influence eating behavior are food advertisements,
the amount of food served, and environmental conditions during the eating activity (Fram-
son et al., 2009). The results of this research are in line with a study conducted by Slo-
bodan and Sosic (2012) that the increasingly rapid development of technology and the ease
with which individuals can access various information via smartphones is one of the rea-
sons current eating behavior is heavily influenced and even driven by exposure to advertising.
Not only that, research results found that the risk of smartphone addiction plays a role
in reducing mindful eating and can also be related to the emotional response dimension. This
research found that the risk of smartphone addiction could be the reason teenagers consume
food because of negative emotional impulses. In other words, the risk of smartphone addiction
has an impact on the emergence of emotional overeating behavior (Etuk et al., 2022). This is
inversely proportional to the meaning of mindful eating, where when teenagers apply mindful
eating, the purpose of teenagers' eating is to fulfill their hunger needs, not to fulfill the nega-
tive emotions they feel (Framson et al., 2009). The connection with smartphone addiction is that
teenagers who are at risk of smartphone addiction have difficulty controlling emotions, especial-
ly negative emotions that arise as a result of smartphone use (Mohta & Halder, 2021). Nega-
tive emotions arise, such as anger and sadness. These emotions are caused by unpleasant things
such as defeat or disappointment when using a smartphone (Caner & Evgin, 2021). This neg-
ative emotion can trigger emotional eating as an emotional response to the situation. Chang's
(2021) research results prove that teenagers who play online games on smartphones and expe-
rience defeat tend to generate negative emotions such as anger, frustration, disappointment,
and sadness. The emergence of negative emotions makes eating a form of compensation and
a form of decreased awareness that emotional factors drive the eating behavior carried out.
In the process, this research still has shortcomings. This can be a consideration for fur-
ther research. Some of these shortcomings include research related to the role of the risk of
smartphone addiction on bed procrastination, which was only able to prove its role at 6.1%. The
remaining 93.9% is due to unmeasured factors such as self-regulation and low knowledge and
awareness of the importance of sleep and fulfilling sufficient sleep time (Kadzikowska-Wrzosek,
2020). Then another weakness of this research is that the distribution of data between men and
women is not balanced. In contrast, the number of teenagers in Indonesia is quite large, so the
data distributed to men and women should be equal. This happened because the teenagers who
acted as participants only came from the area where the researcher lived, and there were no regular
checks regarding the data distribution. Then, in the demographic data section, the researchers did
not ask questions to ensure that the participants involved in this study used smartphones before
sleeping and while eating. Apart from that, this research has not revealed other factors considered
to play a role in sleep procrastination and mindful eating, such as internal factors, external factors,
situations, and social-environmental factors. Not only that, but the sample obtained in this study
was 192. It is still challenging to generalize considering an extensive location, so future research
should examine only specific locations and use other sampling techniques. Furthermore, future
research is expected to pay attention to the distribution of participant data and look at other fac-
tors that are considered to play a role in procrastination behavior during sleep and mindful eating.

CONCLUSION

The results of this research help understand the lifestyle of modern teenagers today. The
results of the study answer the research objectives and prove that changes in adolescent lifestyles
in sleep patterns and eating patterns are significantly influenced by smartphone addiction risk
behavior. Smartphone addiction risk behavior plays a role in increasing procrastination behavior at

8 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

bedtime, as well as decreasing mindful eating behavior in adolescents. Previous findings support these
results that teenagers desire to use smartphones all the time, even at times that should not require
smartphone use, such as when going to bed and eating. Excessive smartphone use behavior supports
the emergence of increased procrastination during sleep and reduces mindful eating behavior. The
findings in this study contribute to helping understand teenagers' lifestyles due to excessive use of
smartphones by looking at the impacts related to healthy behavior. The research findings can also be
helpful as information for psychologists and counselors about smartphone addiction by considering
factors related to procrastination behavior at bedtime and mindful eating, especially in adolescents.

REFERENCES

Alosaimi, F. D., Alyahya, H., Alshahwan, H., Mahyijari, N. A., & Shaik, S. A. (2016). Smartphone
addiction among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Medical Journal, 37(6),
675–683. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.6.14430
Andriani, W. S., Sriati, A., & Yamin, A. (2019). Gambaran kontrol diri penggunaan smartphone
pada siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Sederajat di Kecamatan Jatinangor. Jurnal
Keperawatan Komprehensif (Comprehensive Nursing Journal), 5(2), 101–117. https://doi.
org/10.33755/jkk.v5i2.143
Bahl, S., Ross, S., Milne, G., & Chan, K. (2013). Mindfulness: A long-term solution for mindless
eating by college students. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32(2), 173–184. https://
doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.008
Caner, N., & Evgin, D. (2021). Digital risks and adolescents: The relationships between digital
game addiction, emotional eating, and aggression. International Journal of Mental Health
Nursing, 30(6), 1599–1609. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12912
Chang, Y. (2021). Effects of game situation-dependent emotions on sport spectators’ food craving.
Frontiers in Psychology, 12(11), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.724220
Chung, S. J., An, H., & Suh, S. (2020). What do people do before going to bed? A study of bedtime
procrastination using time use surveys. Sleep, 43(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/
zsz267
Demirci, K., Akgönül, M., & Akpinar, A. (2015). Relationship of smartphone use severity with
sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions,
4(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.010
Dohle, S., Diel, K., & Hofmann, W. (2018). Executive functions and the self-regulation of eating
behavior: A review. Appetite, 124(5), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.041
Duerson, M. H. (2012). We’re addicted to our phones: 84% worldwide say they couldn’t go a single day
without their mobile device in their hand. New York Daily News. https://www.nydailynews.
com/life-style/addicted-phones-84-worldwide-couldn-single-day-mobile-device-hand-
article-1.1137811
Etuk, R., Shirk, S. D., Klein, K. M., Masheb, R. M., Potenza, M. N., Park, C. L., Keeler, K.,
& Kraus, S. W. (2022). Examining the clinical correlates of overeating and binge-eating

Rahayu & Caninsti | 9

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

behaviors among U.S. Veterans. Military Medicine, 187(3–4), 297–303. https://doi.

org/10.1093/milmed/usab533
Framson, C., Kristal, A. R., Schenk, J. M., Littman, A. J., Zeliadt, S., & Benitez, D. (2009).
Development and validation of the mindful eating questionnaire. Journal of The Academy of
Nutrition and Dietetics, 109(8), 1439–1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2009.05.006
Geng, Y., Gu, J., Wang, J., & Zhang, R. (2021). Smartphone addiction and depression, anxiety:
The role of bedtime procrastination and self-control. Journal of Affective Disorders, 293(10),
415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.062
Gökçearslan, Ş., Mumcu, F. K., Haşlaman, T., & Çevik, Y. D. (2016). Modelling smartphone
addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and
cyberloafing in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 63(10), 639–649.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.091
Gonçalves, R. F. da M., Barreto, D. A., Monteiro, P. I., Zangeronimo, M. G., Castelo, P. M., Bilt,
A. van der., & Pereira, L. J. (2019). Smartphone use while eating increases caloric ingestion.
Physiology & Behavior, 204(5), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.021
Gradisar, M., Wolfson, A. R., Harvey, A. G., Hale, L., Rosenberg, R., & Czeisler, C. A. (2013).
The sleep and technology use of Americans: Findings from the National Sleep Foundation’s
2011 sleep in America poll. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 9(12), 1291–1299. https://
doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3272
Grandner, M. A. (2017). Sleep, health, and society. Sleep Medicine Clinics, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jsmc.2016.10.012
Hafiza, D., Utami, A., & Niriyah, S. (2020). Hubungan kebiasaan makan dengan status gizi pada
remaja SMP YLPI Pekanbaru. JMH: Jurnal Medika Hutama, 2(1), 332–342. https://
jurnalmedikahutama.com/index.php/JMH/article/download/85/52/
Hanh, T. N., & Cheung, L. (2010). Savor: Mindful eating, mindful life. HarperOne.
Jarmi, A., & Rahayuningsih, S. I. (2017). Hubungan penggunaan gadget dengan kualitas tidur
pada remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Keperawatan, 2(3), 1–7. https://jim.usk.ac.id/FKep/
article/view/3872/2942
Jenco, M. (2016). AAP endorses new recommendations on sleep times. AAP News. https://publications.
aap.org/aapnews/news/6630?autologincheck=redirected
Jhangiani, R. S., Chiang, I.-C. A., Cuttler, C., & Leighton, D. C. (2019). Research methods in
psychology (4th ed.). Kwantlen Polytechnic University. https://kpu.pressbooks.pub/
psychmethods4e/
Kadzikowska-Wrzosek, R. (2020). Insufficient sleep among adolescents: The role of bedtime
procrastination, chronotype and autonomous vs. controlled motivational regulations.
Current Psychology, 39(6), 1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9825-7
Kartal, F. T., & Ayhan, N. Y. (2021). Relationship between eating disorders and internet and
smartphone addiction in college students. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia,

10 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

Bulimia and Obesity, 26(8), 1853–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-020-01027-x

Keswara, U. R., Syuhada, N., & Wahyudi, W. T. (2019). Perilaku penggunaan gadget dengan
kualitas tidur pada remaja. HJK: Holistik Jurnal Kesehatan, 13(3), 233–239. https://
ejurnalmalahayati.ac.id/index.php/holistik/article/view/1599/pdf
Keyes, K. M., Maslowsky, J., Hamilton, A., & Schulenberg, J. (2015). The great sleep recession:
Changes in sleep duration among US adolescents. Pediatrics, 135(3), 460–468. https://doi.
org/10.1542/peds.2014-2707
Kristeller, J. L., & Wolever, R. Q. (2010). Mindfulness-based eating awareness training for treating
binge eating disorder: The conceptual foundation. The Journal of Treatment & Prevention,
19(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2011.533605
Kroese, F. M., Evers, C., Adriaanse, M. A., & Ridder, D. T. D. D. (2016). Bedtime procrastination:
A self-regulation perspective on sleep insufficiency in the general population. Journal of
Health Psychology, 21(5), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314540014
Kroese, F. M., Ridder, D. T. D. De, Evers, C., & Adriaanse, M. A. (2014). Bedtime procrastination:
introducing a new area of procrastination. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(6), 1–8. https://doi.
org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00611
Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: Development
and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLOS ONE, 8(12), 1–7. https://doi.
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
Lam, L. T. (2014). Risk factors of internet addiction and the health effect of internet addiction on
adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal and prospective studies. Current Psychiatry
Reports, 16(9), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0508-2
Lin, Y.-H., Chang, L.-R., Lee, Y.-H., Tseng, H.-W., Kuo, T. B. J., & Chen, S.-H. (2014).
Development and validation of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI). PLOS ONE,
9(6), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098312
Lin, Y.-H., Chiang, C.-L., Lin, P.-H., Chang, L.-R., Ko, C.-H., Lee, Y.-H., & Lin, S.-H. (2016).
Proposed diagnostic criteria for smartphone addiction. PLOS ONE, 11(11), 1–7. https://
doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0163010
Marsh, S., Mhurchu, C. N., Jiang, Y., & Maddison, R. (2015). Modern screen-use behaviors: The
effects of single- and multi-screen use on energy intake. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5),
543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.009
Mawitjere, O. T., Onibala, F., & Ismanto, Y. A. (2017). Hubungan lama penggunaan gadget dengan
kejadian insomnia pada siswa siswi di SMA Negeri 1 Kawangkoan. E-Jurnal Keperawatan,
5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.35790/jkp.v5i1.15827
Mohta, R., & Halder, S. (2021). A comparative study on cognitive, emotional, and social
functioning in adolescents with and without smartphone addiction. Journal of Indian
Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(4), 44–65. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1177/0973134220210404

Rahayu & Caninsti | 11

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

Monks, F. J., Knoers, A. M. P., & Haditono, S. R. (2002). Psikologi Perkembangan. Gadjah Mada
University Press.
Moray, J., Andi Fu, K. B., & Mayoral, M. S. (2007). Viewing television while eating impairs
the ability to accurately estimate total amount of food consumed. Bariatric Nursing and
Surgical Patient Care, 2(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/bar.2006.9991
Ogden, J., Coop, N., Cousins, C., Crump, R., Field, L., Hughes, S., & Woodger, N. (2013).
Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless
eating. Appetite, 62(12), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.023
Oldham-Cooper, R. E., Hardman, C. A., Nicoll, C. E., Rogers, P. J., & Brunstrom, J. M. (2011).
Playing a computer game during lunch affects fullness, memory for lunch, and later
snack intake. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 93(2), 308–313. https://doi.
org/10.3945/ajcn.110.004580
Örnek, B. Y., & Gündoğmuş, İ. (2022). The effects of smartphone and internet gaming addiction
on eating attitudes among university students. Psychiatry Investigation, 19(1), 1–8. https://
doi.org/10.30773/pi.2021.0230
Pandey, C. M., Ratag, B. T., & Langi, F. L. F. G. (2019). Hubungan antara kecanduan smartphone
dengan kualitas tidur pada siswa SMA Negeri 1 Maesaan Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan.
Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 8(2), 22–29. https://
ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/kesmas/article/view/23935
Rod, N. H., Dissing, A. S., Clark, A., Gerds, T. A., & Lund, R. (2018). Overnight smartphone use:
A new public health challenge? A novel study design based on high-resolution smartphone
data. PLOS ONE, 13(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204811
Slobodan, L., & Sosic, B. (2012). Environment and mental health. Psychiatria Danubina, 24(3),
272–276. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232745570
Smadi, A. A., & Abu-Afouna, N. H. (2012). On least squares estimation in a simple linear regression
model with periodically correlated errors: A cautionary note. Austrian Journal of Statistics,
41(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v41i3.175
Stanszus, L. S., Frank, P., & Geiger, S. M. (2019). Healthy eating and sustainable nutrition through
mindfulness? Mixed method results of a controlled intervention study. Appetite, 141(10),
1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104325
Suni, E., & Vyas, N. (2023). How would later school start times affect sleep? National Sleep Foundation.
https://www.sleepfoundation.org/school-and-sleep/later-school-start-times
Syamsoedin, W. K. P., Bidjuni, H., & Wowiling, F. (2015). Hubungan durasi penggunaan
media sosial dengan kejadian insomnia pada remaja di SMA Negeri 9 Manado. E-Jurnal
Keperawatan, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35790/jkp.v3i1.6691
Trihono, P. P., Djer, M. M., Sjakti, H. A., Hendrarto, T. W., & Prawitasari, T. (2013). Best practices
in pediatrics. Ikatan Dokter Anak Indonesia Cabang DKI Jakarta. https://fk.ui.ac.id/wp-
content/uploads/2016/01/Buku-PKB-IDAI-Jaya-X.pdf

12 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

Wansink, B. (2004). Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume
of unknowing consumers. Annual Review of Nutrition, 24(7), 455–479. https://doi.
org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140
Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research. Nursing Standard, 29(31), 44–48. https://doi.
org/10.7748/ns.29.31.44.e8681
World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). WHO calls for stronger focus on adolescent health. WHO
Media Centre. https://www.who.int/news/item/14-05-2014-who-calls-for-stronger-focus-
on-adolescent-health

Rahayu & Caninsti | 13

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

14 | The Role of Smartphone ...

e-ISSN: 2541-450X Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi
p-ISSN: 0854-2880 2024, 9(1), 1-13

Rahayu & Caninsti | 15