API - FM-198 - Q1 - ISO 9001 - Audit Report Form - 20231123
API - FM-198 - Q1 - ISO 9001 - Audit Report Form - 20231123
Requirements specific to ISO 9001:2015 are highlighted with GRAY shading and they are not applicable
when conducting audits that do not include ISO 9001:2015 within the scope.
This report is not applicable to audits with a scope limited only to ISO 9001:2015.
The designated API auditor shall fill out the relevant section of this document and all applicable FM-199
supplementary audit reports associated with the API product specifications under the scope of the audit.
An audit of the full quality management system must be performed. All sections of this report must be
completed.
Section headings with an asterisk (*) are the mandatory sections that must be filled out during
surveillance audits of Monogram-only facilities. Applicable FM-199 audit reports shall be filled out entirely.
Audit Information*
Facility ID:
Audit ID:
Facility Name:
Facility Address:
Primary Account
Manager(s):
Lead Auditor:
Audit Team Members:
Audit Start Date: Audit End Date:
Audit Type: Number of Employees Verified Number of
(per myCerts): Employees:
Duration: *Assigned Audit Days: *Actual Audit Days:
Justification: *Justification required if different from required audit days – Notify API of any changes and update Audit Plan
Shift 1
Shift 2
Shift 3
Explanation (required for shifts not audited or if sum of employees does not equal verified number of employees):
Audit Scope*
API Spec Q1:10th ed. ISO 9001:2015
Other criteria:
License(s)/Certificate(s) Scope*
--Mark all changes to the scope on this section–
License Cert # Status Expiration Date
API Monogram Marks sampled (on products, letterhead, business cards or any API Verify each of the following:
other medium): Spec:
Note: Identify the API Specification and observed evidence
Applied by licensee only
Verify conformance of the following requirements. Enter N/A if mark is not used. Verified Finding #:
APIQR Marks are only on correspondence, advertising, and promotional materials that are related to the
goods and services referenced in the scope of the Organization’s registration.
The APIQR / ANAB Mark has not been used on a product or product packaging, related documentation, or
in such a way as to suggest that APIQR / ANAB have certified or approved any product, process or service
of the registered organization.
The APIQR and ANAB Marks are used in conjunction with the organization’s name, location and
registration certificate numbers.
The ANAB Mark is used in conjunction with the APIQR Mark, and the size of the ANAB Mark does not
exceed the size of the APIQR Mark.
The APIQR and ANAB Marks are reproduced:
1. in black, its original colors or the predominant color of the letterhead or printing,
2. on a clearly contrasting background, and
3. In a size which makes the mark’s features clearly distinguishable and without distortion of its dimensions.
If applicable - Upon written notification, the organization immediately ceased and desisted in the use of the
APIQR/ANAB Marks and/or API Monogram:
1) upon suspension or cancellation, or
2) In any manner that is determined misleading by API / APIQR.
Applicant organization – APIQR, ANAB Marks and/or API Monogram have not been identified in
promotional materials or other company documentation.
Additional comments:
Refer to FM-011 API Monogram Program Alternative Marking of Products License Agreement
AMA Locations – Identify all AMA locations and mark any changes
Scenarios applicable
(See FM-011, Table 1. Select all that apply) ☐Scenario 1 ☐Scenario 2 ☐Scenario 3
• QMS Scope
• Quality Policy
• Quality Objectives
• QMS Planning and Exclusions
• Internal and External Communication
• Provision of resources
• Organizational Knowledge
• Personnel Competence
• Training
• Work Environment
• Defined Competency Requirement: Organization’s required qualification/competency requirements for the specific position.
• Competency Records: Sampled employee records (e.g. education, experience, certificate, training, etc.)
• QMS Documentation
• Procedures
• Control of Internal Documents
• Control and Use of External Documents
Mark Mark
API API
with “X” with “X”
Spec Q1 Requirement Finding# Spec Q1 Requirement Finding#
if if
Clause Clause
available available
Verification of Purchased
5.5.3 Products, Components or 6.2.2 Internal Audit
Activities
Product Realization*
Audit Conditions
Audit sampling priority should be established according to the conditions outlined below.
Category Category Definition
1 Monogram product currently being manufactured and available for review
Monogrammable (product meeting all requirements but not marked) product currently being
2
manufactured and available for review
3 Non-monogrammable product currently being manufactured and available for review
4 Monogram product manufactured since the last API audit but not available for review (records review)
Monogrammable product manufactured since the last API audit but not available for review (records
5
review)
Non-monogrammable product manufactured since the last API audit but not available for review
6
(records review)
Complete the table below based on the above classifications:
Category Product/Service Identification Specification (as applicable)
In the space provided below, detail the objective evidence (documentation reviewed, records reviewed and personnel interviewed) to
ensure conformance to the identified QMS requirements. Detail any discrepancies / nonconformance identified.
• Determination of Requirements
• Review of Requirements
• Changes to Requirements
Design Package Verify that the licensee/applicant has all required design packages available for each product under the
Requirements (Annex scope of each Monogram License (Yes/No. If no, provide details/identify NC):
A, A.6 – Monogram
Only)
• Planning
• Inputs
• Outputs
• Review
• Verification and Final Review
• Validation and Approval
• Changes
• Purchasing Control
o Procedure
o Initial Supplier Evaluation—Critical Purchases
o Initial Supplier Evaluation – Critical
Purchases – Customer Specified, Proprietary,
and/or Legal Limited
o Initial Supplier Evaluation—Noncritical
Purchases
o Supplier Reevaluation
o Records
o Outsourcing
• Purchasing Information
• Verification of Purchased Products,
Components or Activities
o Procedure
o Critical Purchases
o Noncritical Purchases
o Records
Description of Production Processes (describe what manufacturing/service processes take place at the facility and
interactions):
Processes must be described in specific detail to provide information regarding the capabilities of the facility being audited.
For example: machining > fit-up > welding > heat treatment > ultrasonic testing > assembly > hydrotest, etc.
• Procedure
• Quality Plan
Equipment Qualification
Finding
Requirements: Objective Evidence / Comments: #:
• Procedure
• Equipment
• Personnel
• Specific Methods
• Acceptance Criteria
• Records
• Revalidation
• Evidence of meeting requirements when
outsourced
• Preservation of Product
Inspection, Testing, and Verification
• In-process Inspection, Testing, and Verification
• Final Inspection, Testing, and Verification
• Records
• Preventive Maintenance
• Procedure
• Release upon satisfactory completion of
planned arrangements
• Release of conforming products or authorized
under concession
• Identification of individual releasing product
• Records maintained
API Spec Q1, Section 5.8 Testing, Measuring, Monitoring, and Detection Equipment (TMMDE) *
Requirements: Objective Evidence / Comments: Finding #:
• Procedure
• Equipment
• TMMDE Equipment from Other Sources
• Records
• Procedure
• Nonconforming Product During Product
Realization
• Nonconforming Product After Delivery
• Addressing Nonconforming Product
• Release of Nonconforming Product Under
Concession
• Customer Notification of Nonconforming
Product
• Records
Management of Change
API Spec Q1, Section 5.10 Management of Change
Requirements: Objective Evidence / Comments: Finding #:
• Procedure
• MOC Application
• MOC Notification
• Records
• Customer Satisfaction
• *Internal Audits:
o Performance of Internal Audit
Audit Summary*
The API audit is based on a sampling process of the available information
Strengths:
Summary of the closure and verification of corrective actions for previous findings, if any:
Overall assessment of the capability of the facility to manufacture product(s) (Monogram), the effectiveness of the
management system, and the facility’s ability to perform activities/provide products within the scope of registration:
Were there significant deviations from the audit plan (Y/N)? Comments:
(If any deviations from audit plan, identify reasons and upload an as-
performed revision of the audit plan to myCerts)
Day 2
Day 3
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
If audit duration is longer than 7 days, please add additional daily start/stop time.
Time spent auditing offsite or at other locations, such as subcontractors, must be identified and noted in the audit report.
Registration and / or Licensing may be granted / continued / reinstated based on satisfactory implementation of a Management
System and / or demonstrated capability to meet applicable specification requirements with no nonconformities identified.*
Registration and / or Licensing may be granted / continued / reinstated subject to the review of the nonconformance(s)
identified and acceptance of appropriate corrective action(s) by the API Licensing and Registration Committee. *
Registration and / or Licensing may be subject to the review of the audit results and nonconformance(s) identified, acceptance
of appropriate corrective action(s) and additional actions as defined by the API Licensing & Registration Committee. This
decision may include a re-audit to verify the required corrective actions, withdrawal, suspension and or cancelation.*
* Note: Audits may result in suspension or cancellation of the organization’s license(s) and/or registration(s) or withdrawal of application
for licensing/registration. API makes the final determination of certification status and shall be the sole judge of whether
licensing/registration will be granted/maintained. You will be notified by API if your license/registration is adversely affected by the results
of this audit.
If any part of this audit was performed remotely, please specify (to be completed by Lead Auditor):
• Which processes were audited remotely?
• Whether the remote auditing techniques were effective in achieving the audit objectives?
• Areas that require special attention during the next on-site audit, if applicable. Please provide a detailed
explanation.
By signing below, I (we) attest that the information above is accurate and has been collected by the audit team during the
performance of the audit that was assigned to me (us) by API and that audit recommendations and conclusions were
communicated to the organization. (Digital Signatures are acceptable)
Audit Team Leader: Date:
Audit Team Member: Date:
Audit Team Member: Date:
By signing this document, it is not an admission of the acceptance of any nonconformities/concerns identified by the audit
team. The signature only confirms that the audit was performed and the audit recommendations and audit conclusions were
communicated by the auditor. API reserves the right to have final determination of the level of nonconformity identified in the
audit report. (Digital Signatures are acceptable)
Organization Representative (optional): Date:
Enter the next audit date below :
• Initial 1st Surveillance audit after stage 2 initial audit – 9 months after the last day of the initial stage 2 audit
• 1st surveillance audits – 30 months before expiration date
• 2nd surveillance audits – 18 months before expiration date
• Recertification/Renewal audits – 6 months before expiration date
Next Audit Target Date:
Next Audit Type:
(Preliminary date subject to change)
Participants (Name & Position) - Initial/check the meetings attended Opening Closing
The information contained in this report is confidential and subject to the confidentiality agreement between the Audit
Team/Auditor(s) and API. Details of the assessment results are found in the succeeding pages of this report.