Guidelines For Treatment of Lysosomal Storage Diseases by Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Malaysia
Guidelines For Treatment of Lysosomal Storage Diseases by Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Malaysia
11(GU)
Therapy in Malaysia
A catalogue record of this document is available from the Library and Resource
Unit of the Institute of Medical Research, Ministry of Health;
MOH/P/PAK/216.11(GU)
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a database or
retrieval system, or distributed in any form or any means, without prior written permission of
the Ministry of Health Malaysia.
CONTENTS
1 Foreword 4
2 Introduction 5
3 Guideline on Gaucher disease 9
4 Guideline on Pompe disease 17
5 Guideline on Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I 25
6 Guideline on Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II 33
7 Guideline on Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI 41
8 Guideline on Fabry disease 47
9 Appendix 55
A: General conditions for eligibility 56
B: Patient’s consent form (Borang Persetujuan Pesakit) 58
C: Monitoring requirements and data submission form for Gaucher disease 63
D: Monitoring requirements and data submission form for Pompe disease 69
E: Monitoring requirements and data submission form for MPS diseases 80
F: Monitoring requirements and data submission form for Fabry disease 88
G: SF-36 health survey score sheet 96
H: Gross motor function measure score sheet 103
I : Brief pain inventory (short form) 110
J : MRC scale for assessment of muscle power 114
10 Drafting Committee 117
11 Acknowledgement 118
Rare inherited Lysosomal Storage Diseases (LSD) pose diagnostic and therapeutic
challenge. They are also increasingly becoming a health care and economic challenge, mainly
due to the development and availability of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for some LSDs.
Currently ERT are available for six LSDs: Mucopolysaccharidosis Type 1(MPS I), MPS II, MPS
VI, Fabry disease, Pompe disease and Gaucher disease.
The Malaysian Government, through the Ministry of Health, has approved the funding
for Enzyme Replacement Therapy Program for LSDs, and provides subsidized access to
expensive and potentially lifesaving drugs for these life-threatening diseases. It would appear
rational to have a national guideline to ensure consistency and a sustainable program. This is
also to ensure careful spending of public funding.
A candidate must fully satisfy the eligibility criteria of the relevant disease as stated in
this guideline before a consideration for the subsidized drugs is to be made. Patient eligibility will
be reviewed in accordance with the frequency stated in this guideline, generally 12 months after
commencing therapy and every 12 months thereafter. Continued eligibility will be subjected to
the evaluation of evidence for
LSDs in general are progressive multi organ disorder with about 50% having significant
central nervous system involvement. Each LSD comprises a more or less unique clinical
spectrum with patients at the more severe end showing increased morbidity and mortality
whereas patients at the milder end of the spectrum having only subtle clinical signs. Patients
with mild disease may often go unrecognized for many years.
In the past, no specific treatment was available for the affected patients; management
mainly consisted of supportive care and treatment of complications. Allogeneic bone marrow
transplantation (BMT) was the first specific therapeutic approach to be used in LSDs. The vast
majority of clinical experience is in treating patients with mucopolysaccharidoses, particularly
MPS I. Because of the risks associated with the procedure, allogeneic BMT has generally been
used in the more severe, Hurler form of MPS I and the vast majority of children have been
transplanted before the age of three. In the last 2 decades, remarkable progress has been
achieved in the field of LSD with the development of innovative therapies including enzyme
replacement therapies (ERT) and substrate reduction therapy(SRT). Additional therapies such
as chaperone therapy and gene therapy are currently under preclinical investigations. Currently
ERT are available for MPS I, II, VI, Fabry, Pompe and Gaucher diseases. In addition SRT has
been licensed for Gaucher disease.3,4,5
Enzyme replacement therapy for LSD is expensive compared to treatment modalities for
other rare inborn errors of metabolism (dietary therapy, co-factor substitution). The development
of these effective but very expensive therapies presents special problems for health care policy-
makers, who are committed to ensuring access to new therapies which are life saving for
affected patients; but who at the same time are also under pressure to control overall health
care spending. Therefore, a national policy and guideline is deemed necessary to determine
which patients should be treated with this very costly treatment.
The aim of this guideline is to provide guidance judged to be necessary for the selection
of patients for ERT. The candidate must meet all the eligibility criteria and none of the exclusion
criteria in order to be considered for government funded ERT. Government funded ERT will
only be provided where the patient agrees to participate in the evaluation of the efficacy of
the treatment by periodic medical assessment. Continued eligibility will be subjected to clinical
improvement in the patient, and/or stabilisation of the patient’s condition. Separate guidelines
are written for each of the following LSDs:
The committee will review and revise these guidelines periodically in line with any new
medical development and evidence in the field of LSD.
References :-
1. Poorthuis BJ, Wevers RA, Kleijer WJ, Groener JE, de Jong JG, van Weely S,Niezen-Koning KE, van Diggelen OP.
1999. The frequency of lysosomal storage diseases in The Netherlands. Hum Genet 105:151–156.
2. Lin HY, Lin SP, Chuang CK, Niu DM, ChenMR, Tsai FJ, Chao MC, Chiu PC, Lin SJ, Tsai LP, Hwu WL, Lin JL. 2009.
Incidence of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Taiwan,1984–2004 Am J Med Genet Part A 149A:960–964.
3. Beck M. 2007. New therapeutic options for lysosomal storage disorders: Enzyme replacement, small molecules
and gene therapy. Hum Genet 121:1–22.
4. P.M. Hoogerbrugge, O.F. Brouwer, P. Bordigoni, O. Ringden, P. Kapaun, J.J. Ortega, A.O’Meara, G. Cornu, G.
Souillet, D. Frappaz, et al., Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for lysosomal storage diseases. The European
Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation, Lancet 345 (1995) 1398–1402 issn: 0140–6736.
5. R.O Brady, Enzyme replacement for lysosomal diseases, Annu. Rev. Med. 57 (2006) 283–296
An effective treatment of Gaucher Disease has now been available since 1991 in the
form of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The two recombinant β-glucosylceramidase enzyme
preparations are currently available commercially and are distinguished according to the cell
In clinical studies, ERT is effective for treatment of the haematologic, visceral and bone
complications of the Gaucher Disease. The efficacy of ERT for neurologic complications is not
proven conclusively and still under investigation.7-11 Individuals with chronic neurologic GD
and progressive disease despite ERT may be candidates for BMT or a multi-modal approach
(i.e., combined ERT and BMT). Miglustat, an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthetase, which is
administered orally, may be an alternative for the treatment of individuals with mild to moderate
Gaucher Disease for whom ERT is not a therapeutic option because of constraints such as
allergy, hypersensitivity, or poor venous access.12
While ERT is effective, such chronic treatment places a burden on the individual patient,
and is costly for society. Therefore, some guidance was judged to be necessary for the selection
of patients for treatment.
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
The diagnosis of Gaucher Disease must have been established by the demonstration of
specific deficiency of β-glucosylceramidase in leukocytes or cultured skin fibroblasts. The
diagnosis can also be confirmed by the presence of glucocerebrosidase gene mutations
known to result in severe deficiency of enzyme activity.
a. ERT is only for Type I Gaucher Disease with clinically significant symptoms.
b. Type II and III patients exhibiting primary neurological disease due to Gaucher
disease would not be considered eligible for treatment with ERT. Exception to this
is children with oculomotor apraxia as their only neurological finding.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1. The treatment of asymptomatic patients is not generally granted unless the disease is of
sufficient severity to suggest a severe course or impending complications (this could be
determined through mutation analysis in the asymptomatic patient), or the presence of a
family history of severe, accelerated course of the disease during childhood.
3. The patient should not have any Gaucher Disease related or any other medical condition
that might reasonably be expected to compromise their response to ERT.
4. In some patients with Gaucher disease, secondary pathologic changes, such as avascular
necrosis of bone, may already have occurred that would not be expected to respond to
ERT. In such patients, reversal of the pathology is unlikely. Treatment of patients with
significant secondary pathology would be directed at preventing further progression of
the disease. In these cases, the extent to which symptoms, such as bone pain, are due
to active progression of the disease, rather than the secondary pathology, can only be
established by a trial of therapy.
DOSING RECOMMENDATIONS
The dose of imiglucerase generally ranges between 15 and 60 units of enzyme per
kilogram body weight by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks. The enzyme dose may be
increased or decreased after initiation of treatment and during the maintenance phase, based
on clinical response – i.e., hematopoietic reconstitution, reduction of liver and spleen volumes,
and stabilization or improvement in skeletal findings.
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/guardians (if patient is younger than 18 years old) are required
to sign a consent form prior to the start of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of
application (see Appendix B).
Patient who is on subsidized ERT should be reviewed at regular intervals by the ERT
Technical Committee, based on the haematological, biochemical and radiological data that are
to be collected by the treating doctor (see Appendix C).
WITHDRAWAL OF THERAPY
a. the patient fails to comply adequately with treatment (defaults 2 or more infusions
over 6 months period without acceptable reason) or monitoring requirements, taken
to evaluate the effectiveness of the therapy
b. if therapy fails to relieve the symptoms that originally resulted in the patient being
approved for subsidized treatment
- Opisthotonus
- Seizures
1. Grabowski GA, Kolodny EH, Weinreb NJ, Rosenbloom BE, Prakash-Cheng A, Kaplan P, Charrow J, Rastores
GM, Mistry PK. Gaucher disease: phenotypic and genetic variation. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS,
Valle D, Vogelstein B, eds.The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID). New York:
McGraw-Hill; Chap 146.1. Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Grabowski GA, Horowitz M. Gaucher’s disease: molecular, genetic and enzymological aspects. Baillieres
Clin Haematol.1997;10:635–56.
3. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, ClagueAE, Carey WF. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA. 1999;281:249–
54.
4. Grabowski GA, Andria G, Baldellou A, Campbell PE, Charrow J, Cohen IJ, Harris CM, Kaplan P, Mengel E,
Pocovi M, Vellodi A. Pediatric non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease: presentation, diagnosis and assessment.
Consensus statements.Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163:58–66.
5. Pastores GM (2003) Enzyme therapy for the lysosomal storage disorders: principles, patents, practice and
prospects. Expert Opin Ther Patents 13:1157-72.
6. Zimran A, Altarescu G, Philips M, Attias D, Jmoudiak M, Deeb M, Wang N, Bhirangi K, Cohn GM, Elstein
D. Phase 1/2 and extension study of velaglucerase alfa replacement therapy in adults with type 1 Gaucher
disease: 48-month experience.Blood. 2010;115:4651–6.
7. Weinreb NJ, Charrow J, Andersson HC, Kaplan P, Kolodny EH, Mistry P, Pastores G, Rosenbloom BE, Scott
CR, Wappner RS, Zimran A. Effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy in 1028 patients with type 1
Gaucher disease after 2 to 5 years of treatment: a report from the Gaucher Registry. Am J Med. 2002;113:112–
9.
8. Mistry PK, Cappellini MD, Lukina E, Ozsan H, Mach Pascual S, Rosenbaum H, Helena Solano M, Spigelman
Z, Villarrubia J, Watman NP, Massenkeil G. A reappraisal of Gaucher disease-diagnosis and disease
management algorithms. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:110–5.
9. Baldellou A, Andria G, Campbell PE, Charrow J, Cohen IJ, Grabowski GA, Harris CM, Kaplan P, McHugh
K, Mengel E, Vellodi A. Paediatric non-neuronopathic Gaucher disease: recommendations for treatment and
monitoring. Eur J Pediatr.2004;163:67–75.
10. Charrow J, Andersson HC, Kaplan P, Kolodny EH, Mistry P, Pastores G, Prakash-Cheng A, Rosenbloom BE,
Scott CR, Wappner RS, Weinreb NJ. Enzyme replacement therapy and monitoring for children with type 1
Gaucher disease: consensus recommendations. J Pediatr. 2004;144:112–20.
11. Hughes D, Cappellini MD, Berger M, Van Droogenbroeck J, de Fost M, Janic D, Marinakis T, Rosenbaum
H, Villarubia J, Zhukovskaya E, Hollak C. Recommendations for the management of the haematological and
onco-haematological aspects of Gaucher disease. Br J Haematol. 2007;138:676–86.
12. Pastores GM, Elstein D, Hrebicek M, Zimran A. Effect of miglustat on bone disease in adults with type 1
Gaucher disease: a pooled analysis of three multinational, open-label studies. Clin Ther. 2007;29:1645–54.
1. Dr A Vellodi, Dr JE Wraith, Dr K McHugh and Mr A Cooper for the National Specialist Commissioning
Advisory Group (NSCAG).guidelines for the management of Paediatric Gaucher disease in the united
kingdom (August 2005). www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/
digitalasset/dh_4118411.pdf
2. P Deegan, D Hughes, A Mehta, TM Cox. UK National Guideline for Adult Gaucher Disease (April 2005). www.
specialisedservices.nhs.uk/.../Guidelines_for_Adult_Gauchers_Disease.pdf
3. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia Guidelines for the treatment of Gaucher Disease through the Life
Saving Drugs Program (September 2009). www.commcarelink.health.gov.au/.../Guidelines%20Gaucher%20
Disease.pdf
4. Canadian guidelines for treatment of Gaucher Disease by enzyme replacement with imiglucerase
or substrate reduction therapy with miglustat (Version 8; March 26, 2007) www.garrod.ca/data/.../
RevisedGaucherGuidelinesV8Mar26-07.pdf
Pompe Disease is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by the deficiency of acid
α-glucosidase (GAA), which is needed for the degradation of lysosomal glycogen. The disease
causes lysosomal glycogen to accumulate in various tissues, particularly muscle, resulting in
progressive muscle dysfunction.1 Incidence data for Pompe Disease is limited with reports
ranging from 1 in 14,000 to 1 in 300,000 depending upon ethnicity or the geographic area
studied.2
Symptoms with late onset Pompe Disease may start at any age and rate of disease
progression is variable. It is associated with significant morbidity, and as the disease advances
patients often become wheelchair bound and require artificial ventilation due to respiratory
insufficiency. Most patients with infantile-onset disease have undetectable to minimal GAA
activity, whereas those with the late-onset phenotype tend to have a limited amount of residual
GAA activity.1,3,4
Until 2006, there has been no specific treatment for Pompe Disease, other than
supportive care such as symptomatic treatment of cardiomyopathy and respiratory support. A
high-protein, low-carbohydrate diet or, alternatively, a diet rich in L-alanine has shown benefit in
some but not all patients with late-onset Pompe Disease.
Since 1999 enzyme therapy with recombinant human alpha-glucosidase was investigated
as treatment for the disease. In 2006, enzyme replacement therapy with Chinese hamster ovary
cell derived recombinant human acid alpha glucosidase (alglucosidase alfa, Genzyme) was
approved by both the European Union and the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment
of patients with this otherwise devastating and lethal disease. It degrades glycogen by catalyzing
the hydrolysis of alpha 1, 4 and alpha 1, 6 glycosidic linkages of lysosomal glycogen. Till
now, ERT using alglucosidase alfa is the only approved specific treatment available for Pompe
Disease. Alglucosidase alfa has been approved by National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau for
treatment of Pompe Disease in Malaysia.
While ERT is effective, such chronic treatment places a burden on the individual patient,
and is costly for society. Therefore, some guidance was judged to be necessary for the selection
of patients for treatment.
Infantile disease:
All patients become symptomatic and diagnosed in the first two years of life with a
documented deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase measured in lymphocytes, muscle, skin
fibroblasts. This will include “classic” infantile patients presenting with severe cardiomyopathy
in the first few months of life and also variant patients who present outside the first year of life
but suffering from early onset cardiomyopathy.
Late-onset disease:
All patients become symptomatic and diagnosed over the age of 2 years with a
documented deficiency of acid alpha-glucosidase measured in lymphocytes, muscle or skin
fibroblasts.
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
The diagnosis of Pompe disease must have been established by one of the following
methods:
Infantile disease
a. All patients with infantile disease with cardiomyopathy, muscle weakness and/or
respiratory compromise are eligible for ERT except for patients who are already on
long term invasive ventilation for respiratory failure or in such an advance stage of
disease that will not benefit from treatment.
b. CRIM status: patients who are CRIM negative are not excluded from ERT but may
need a modified plan for enzyme therapy.
Late-onset disease
2. The presence of severe or irreversible muscle/cardiac end organ damage that is not likely
to improve with ERT.
b. To comply with the requirement to undergo regular follow up, evaluation and,
monitoring procedures as stated in the ERT guidelines.
DRUG DOSAGE
Recommended dose regimen for alglucosidase alfa is 20 mg/kg/every other week via
intravenous infusion.
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/ guardians are required to sign a consent form prior to the start
of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of application (see Appendix B).
MONITORING OF THERAPY
Patient who is on subsidized ERT are monitored at regular intervals by the Technical
Committee on ERT, basing on the data that are to be collected by the treating doctor (see
Appendix D).
b. if therapy fails to relieve the symptoms of the disease that originally resulted in
the patient being approved for subsidized treatment
d. the muscle tone is so poor that there is no useful movement or motor development
1. Hirschhorn R, Reuser AJJ. Glycogen storage disease type II: (acid maltase) deficiency. In: Scriver CR,
Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease
(OMMBID). New York: McGraw-Hill. Chap 135. Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Lin CY, Hwang B, Hsiao KJ, Jin YR. Pompe’s disease in Chinese and prenatal diagnosis by determination of
alpha-glucosidase activity. J Inherit Metab Dis. 1987;10:11–7
3. van den Hout HM, Hop W, van Diggelen OP, Smeitink JA, Smit GP, Poll-The BT, Bakker HD, Loonen MC, de
Klerk JB, Reuser AJ, van der Ploeg AT. The natural course of infantile Pompe’s disease: 20 original cases
compared with 133 cases from the literature. Pediatrics. 2003;112:332–40.
4. Hagemans ML, Winkel LP, Van Doorn PA, et al. Clinical manifestation and natural course of late-onset
Pompe’s disease in 54 Dutch patients. Brain 2005;128(Pt 3):671–7.
5. Kishnani PS, Corzo D, Nicolino M, et al. Recombinant human acid [alpha]-glucosidase: major clinical benefits
in infantile-onset Pompe disease. Neurology 2007;68(2):99–109.
6. Kishnani PS, Corzo D, Leslie ND, Gruskin D, Van der Ploeg A, Clancy JP, Parini R, Morin G, Beck M, Bauer
MS, Jokic M, Tsai CE, Tsai BW, Morgan C, O’Meara T, Richards S, Tsao EC, Mandel H. Early treatment with
alglucosidase alpha prolongs long-term survival of infants with Pompe disease. Pediatr Res. 2009;66:329–35.
7. Nicolino M, Byrne B, Wraith JE, Leslie N, Mandel H, Freyer DR, Arnold GL, Pivnick EK, Ottinger CJ,
Robinson PH, Loo JC, Smitka M, Jardine P, Tatò L, Chabrol B, McCandless S, Kimura S, Mehta L, Bali D,
Skrinar A, Morgan C, Rangachari L, Corzo D, Kishnani PS. Clinical outcomes after long-term treatment with
alglucosidase alfa in infants and children with advanced Pompe disease. Genet Med. 2009;11:210–9.
8. Strothotte S, Strigl-Pill N, Grunert B, Kornblum C, Eger K, Wessig C, Deschauer M, Breunig F, Glocker FX,
Vielhaber S, Brejova A, Hilz M, Reiners K, Müller-Felber W, Mengel E, Spranger M, Schoser B. Enzyme
replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in 44 patients with late-onset glycogen storage disease type 2:
12-month results of an observational clinical trial. J Neurol. 2010;257:91–7.
9. van der Ploeg AT, Clemens PR, Corzo D, Escolar DM, Florence J, Groeneveld GJ, Herson S, Kishnani
PS, Laforet P, Lake SL, Lange DJ, Leshner RT, Mayhew JE, Morgan C, Nozaki K, Park DJ, Pestronk A,
Rosenbloom B, Skrinar A, van Capelle CI, van der Beek NA, Wasserstein M, Zivkovic SA. A randomized study
of alglucosidase alfa in late-onset Pompe’s disease.N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1396–406.
10. American College of Medical Genetics. Pompe disease diagnosis and management guideline. Available
at www.acmg.net(pdf). 2006
11. Pompe Disease Diagnostic Working Group; Methods for a prompt and reliable laboratory diagnosis of Pompe
disease: report from an international consensus meeting. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;93:275–81.
12. Kishnani PS, Goldenberg PC, DeArmey SL, Heller J, Benjamin D, Young S, Bali D, Smith SA, Li JS, Mandel
H, Koeberl D, Rosenberg A, Chen YT. Cross-reactive immunologic material status affects treatment outcomes
in Pompe disease infants.Mol Genet Metab. 2010;99:26–33.
1. J.E. Wraith, P. Lee, A. Vellodi, M.A. Cleary, U. Ramaswami, Edmund Jessop. Guidelines for the Investigation
and Management of Infantile Pompe disease (2 August 2006) www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/
Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4137654
2. P.B. Deegan,T.M. Cox, S Waldek, R Lachmann, Uma Ramaswami, Edmund Jessop. Guidelines for the
Investigation and Management of Late Onset Acid Maltase Deficiency (Type II Glycogen Storage Disease /
Pompe Disease) (Version 3 August 2007). http://www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/library/23/Guidelines_for_
Late_Onset_Pompe_Disease.pdf
3. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Guidelines for the treatment of infantile-onset Pompe disease
through the life saving drugs program . www.health.gov.au/internet/.../Infantile-Onset%20Pompe%20dis-
ease.doc
Patients with MPS I are classified into three clinical syndromes based on their symptoms
and the severity of their symptoms – Hurler, Hurler-Scheie and Scheie. Hurler syndrome is the
most severe clinical phenotype; Hurler-Scheie syndrome is an intermediate clinical phenotype;
and Scheie syndrome is a milder clinical phenotype.1,2
Hurler syndrome (MPS IH) is characterized by facial and skeletal deformities, cardiac
disease, respiratory difficulties and mental retardation/ regression. In Scheie syndrome (MPS
IS), joint stiffness, aortic valve disease and corneal clouding are the leading symptoms. Patients
with Scheie syndrome are of normal intelligence and may have a near normal life-span. Hurler-
Scheie syndrome (MPS IH-S) is an intermediate clinical phenotype and clinical features include
short stature, coarse facies, corneal clouding, joint stiffness, deafness, valvular heart disease
and there is usually little or no intellectual dysfunction.1,2 MPS I is seen in all populations at a
frequency of approximately 1:100,000 for the severe form and 1:500,000 for the attenuated
form.3
In 2003, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with Chinese hamster ovary cell derived
recombinant human α-L-iduronidase ( Laronidase, Genzyme), was approved by both the
European Union and the US Food and Drug Administration for long term treatment of patients
with MPS I. Laronidase has been approved by National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau for
treatment of MPS I in Malaysia.
In view of the very high cost of treatment, wide variation in the extent of ERT benefit,
and the risk and inconvenience associated with the need for frequent intravenous injections;
guidelines are necessary for the selection of patients for treatment with the newly available
intervention.
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
The diagnosis of MPS I must have been established by the demonstration of specific
deficiency of α-L-Iduronidase measured in lymphocytes or skin fibroblasts. The diagnosis
can also be confirmed by the presence of mutations in the α-L-Iduronidase gene known
to result in severe deficiency of enzyme activity.
3. Severity of disease
Patients with FVC less than 80% of predicted value for height
iii. Cardiac
Patients with little or no cognitive impairment (MPS IS or I H-S) who fail to meet above
criteria should be followed up in a systematic way with annual assessments designed to
detect deterioration in their clinical condition. In this way they may be identified as suitable
for treatment with ERT at a later date.
As Laronidase has only been shown to improve the non-neurological features of MPS I,
there is no indication for long term treatment in MPS IH patients who have not had or are not
planning to have a bone marrow transplant. BMT/HSCT transplant remains the treatment
of choice for MPS IH.
4. Option of BMT/HSCT
All patients who are less than 2 years old and have normal IQ [>70] should be offered
work up for BMT/HSCT if there is suitable donor.
2. The presence of severe or irreversible end organ damage that is not likely to improve with
ERT.
b. To comply with the requirement to undergo regular follow up, evaluation and,
monitoring procedures as recommended by the ERT committee, for the purpose of
evaluating treatment efficacy and complication of the disease.
DRUG DOSAGE
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/ guardians are required to sign a consent form prior to the start
of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of application (see Appendix B).
MONITORING OF THERAPY
Patient who is on subsidized ERT are monitored at regular intervals by the Technical
Committee on ERT, basing on the data that are to be collected by the treating doctor (see
Appendix E).
b. If the patient fails to comply with the therapy, follow up, evaluation and assessment
procedure as recommended by the ERT guidelines.
1. Neufeld EF, Muenzer J. The Mucopolysaccharidoses. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B
(eds) The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID), McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap 136.
Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Muenzer J. The mucopolysaccharidoses: a heterogeneous group of disorders with variable pediatric presentations. J
Pediatr.2004;144:S27–34.
3. Lowry RB, Applegarth DA, Toone JR, MacDonald E, Thunem NY. An update on the frequency of mucopolysaccharide
syndromes in British Columbia. Hum Genet. 1990;85:389–90.
4. Braunlin EA, Stauffer NR, Peters CH, Bass JL, Berry JM, Hopwood JJ, Krivit W. Usefulness of bone marrow
transplantation in the Hurler syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:882–6.
5. Cox-Brinkman J, Boelens JJ, Wraith JE. Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in combination with enzyme
replacement therapy (ERT) in patients with Hurler syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006;38:17–21.
6. Wraith EJ, Hopwood JJ, Fuller M, Meikle PJ, Brooks DA. Laronidase treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis
I. BioDrugs.2005;19:1–7.
7. Coppa GV, Buzzega D, Zampini L, Maccari F, Galeazzi T, Pederzoli F, Gabrielli O, Volpi N. Effect of 6 years of
enzyme replacement therapy on plasma and urine glycosaminoglycans in attenuated MPS I patients. Glycobiology.
2010 Oct;20(10):1259-73
9. Clarke LA, Wraith JE, Beck M, Kolodny EH, Pastores GM, Muenzer J, Rapoport DM, Berger KI, Sidman
M, Kakkis ED, Cox GF. Long-term efficacy and safety of laronidase in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis I.
Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):229-40.
10. Wraith JE. The first 5 years of clinical experience with laronidase enzyme replacement therapy for
mucopolysaccharidosis I. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005 Mar;6(3):489-506.
Website resources
1. J.E. Wraith, A. Vellodi, M.A. Cleary, U. Ramaswami, C. Lavery Edmund Jessop. Guidelines for the Investigation
and Management of Mucopolysaccharidosis type I. www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/.../Guidelines_for_
Mucopolysaccharidosis_Type_I.pdf
2. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Guidelines for the treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS
I) disease through life saving drugs programe. www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/.../
MPS%20I.doc
MPS II is a rare X-linked disorder which typically affects the males but has also rarely
been reported in females. The disease is progressive and eventually results in death, most
commonly due to respiratory or/and cardiac failure. However, the severity varies and could
range from the mild to severe. The severe form of MPS II is more common, has an early age
of onset, usually between 1-4 years of age, and involves the central nervous system leading
to intellectual impairment and progressive neurodegeneration. Other clinical features include
coarse facies, growth retardation, joint stiffness, communicating hydrocephalus, chronic
diarrhoea, sensorineural deafness, compression of the cervical cord, chronic respiratory disease,
degeneration of the retina and cardiac valvular disease. The course is rapidly progressive and
leads to death usually between 10 and 20 years of age.1,2,5
The attenuated form of MPS II has a later onset and has a slower rate of progression.
There is little or no involvement of the central nervous system so intelligence is preserved. The
somatic features are similar to, but milder than the severe form. Short stature, joint stiffness,
early-onset osteoarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, cardiac valvular disease, cervical cord
compression and sensorineural hearing loss are common features. Survival to the fifth or sixth
decade occurs although deaths from the late teenage years have been reported.1
In view of the very high cost of treatment, wide variation in the extent of ERT benefit,
and the risk and inconvenience associated with the need for frequent intravenous injections;
guidelines are necessary for the selection of patients for this intervention.
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
The patient has been confirmed to have the disease by the demonstration of absent
or deficient Iduronate-2-Sulphatase activity in any of the following tissues/body fluid:
serum, leucocytes and fibroblast. The diagnosis can also be confirmed by the presence
of iduronate-2-sulphatase gene mutations known to result in severe deficiency of enzyme
activity.
3. Severity of disease
Patients with FVC less than 80% of predicted value for height
Patients with little or no cognitive impairment who fail to meet above criteria should be
followed up in a systematic way with annual assessments designed to detect deterioration
in their clinical condition. In this way they may be identified as suitable for treatment with
ERT at a later date.
2. The presence of severe or irreversible end organ damage that is not likely to improve with
ERT.
b. To comply with the requirement to undergo regular follow up, evaluation and,
monitoring procedures as recommended by the ERT committee, for the purpose of
evaluating treatment efficacy and complication of the disease.
DRUG DOSAGE
Recommended dose regimen for idursulfase is 0.5 mg/kg weekly via intravenous infusion.
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/ guardians are required to sign a consent form prior to the start
of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of application (see Appendix B).
MONITORING OF THERAPY
Patient who is on subsidized ERT are monitored at regular intervals by the Technical
Committee on ERT, basing on the data that are to be collected by the treating doctor (see
Appendix E).
a. If the patient develops progressive neurological decline. This would indicate that
the child has the severe form of Hunter disease
b. b.If the patient fails to comply with the therapy, follow up, evaluation and assessment
procedure as recommended by the ERT guidelines.
c. c.If the patient develops another unrelated life threatening diseases/ conditions or
severe diseases/condition that is likely to shorten his/her Iife span and life quality,
in which he/she will not gain benefit from ERT for MPS II disease.
d. d.If the patient develops a life threatening complication, which would compromise
the effectiveness or benefit from continued ERT, including severe infusion-related
adverse reactions or antibody-related reactions which are not preventable or
controlled by appropriate pre-medication and/or adjustment of infusion rates
e. e.If the patient develops irreversible or severe life threatening complications of MPS
II that will not benefit from further ERT. For example: cardiac failure secondary to
severe mitral regurgitation.
1. Neufeld EF, Muenzer J. The Mucopolysaccharidoses. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B
(eds) The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID), McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap 136.
Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Wraith JE, Scarpa M, Beck M, Bodamer OA, De Meirleir L, Guffon N, Meldgaard Lund A, Malm G, Van der
Ploeg AT, Zeman J. Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): a clinical review and recommendations for
treatment in the era of enzyme replacement therapy. Eur J Pediatr. 2008;167(3):267–77.
4. Nelson J, Crowhurst J, Carey B, Greed L. Incidence of the mucopolysaccharidoses in Western Australia. Am J Med
Genet A. 2003;123A(3):310–3.
5. Muenzer J, Beck M, Eng CM, Escolar ML, Giugliani R, Guffon NH, Harmatz P, Kamin W, Kampmann C, Koseoglu
ST, Link B, Martin RA, Molter DW, Muñoz Rojas MV, Ogilvie JW, Parini R, Ramaswami U, Scarpa M, Schwartz
IV, Wood RE, Wraith E. Multidisciplinary management of Hunter syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):e1228–39.
6. Muenzer J, Wraith JE, Beck M, Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Eng CM, Vellodi A, Martin R, Ramaswami U, Gucsavas-
Calikoglu M, Vijayaraghavan S, Wendt S, Puga AC, Ulbrich B, Shinawi M, Cleary M, Piper D, Conway AM, Kimura
A. A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter
syndrome). Genet Med.2006;8:465–73
7. Schulze-Frenking G, Jones SA, Roberts J, Beck M, Wraith JE. Effects of enzyme replacement therapy on growth
in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34:203–8. Wraith JE, Beck M, Giugliani
R, Clarke J, Martin R, Muenzer J., HOS Investigators. Initial report from the Hunter Outcome Survey. Genet
Med. 2008;10:508–16.
8. Muenzer J, Gucsavas-Calikoglu M, McCandless SE, et al. A phase 1/11 clinical trial of enzyme replacement
therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis 1/(Hunter syndrome). Mol Genet Metab 1997;90:329-37
9. Manara R, Rampazzo A, Cananzi M, Salviati L, Mardari R, Drigo P, Tomanin R, Gasparotto N, Priante E, Scarpa M.
Hunter syndrome in an 11-year old girl on enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase: brain magnetic resonance
imaging features and evolution. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010
Website resources
1. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Guidelines for the treatment of MucopolysacharidosisType II (MPS II)
disease through life saving drugs programe.
www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/.../lsdp.../MPS%20II.doc
3. A. Vellodi, J.E. Wraith, M.A. Cleary, U. Ramaswami, C. Lavery, Edmund Jessop. Guidelines for the Investigation
and Management of Mucopolysaccharidosis type II.
www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/.../Guidelines_for_Mucopolysaccharidosis_Type_II.pdf
MPS VI patients can present with a spectrum of clinical phenotypes. The classical
symptoms of MPS VI include short stature, hepatosplenomegaly, dysostosis multiplex, joint
stiffness, corneal clouding, cardiac abnormalities, and facial dysmorphia. Severely affected
patients suffer early onset symptoms with rapid disease progression, while patients at the
attenuated end of the clinical spectrum have a later onset and variable clinical presentation. In
the severe form of MPS VI, death usually occurs in the early teenage years due to respiratory
and cardiac problems, while in patients with the attenuated form, lifespan can be up to 50 or
more years in some cases. In contrast to many of the MPS disorders, MPS VI is not typically
associated with progressive impairment of mental status, although physical limitations may
impact learning and development. Birth prevalence is between 1 in 43,261 and 1 in 1,505,160
live births.1,2
In the past, limited treatment options for MPS VI led many clinicians to adopt a palliative
approach and focus primarily on management of individual disease complications such as
physical therapy to minimize joint contractures and stiffness and improve muscle strength,
spinal fusion for spinal cord compression or progressive kyphosis, hernia repair, tonsillectomy
and adenoidectomy for airway obstruction or eustachian tube dysfunction.
Historically, HSCT had been the only specific therapy available for MPS VI. Successful
HSCT has benefited a small number of patients with MPS VI. In 2006, enzyme replacement therapy
(ERT) with Chinese hamster ovary cell derived recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine-
4-sulphatase (Recombinant Human Arylsulfatase B or rhASB; Galsulfase; Biomarin), was
approved by both the European Union and the US Food and Drug Administration for long term
treatment of patients with MPS VI. In clinical studies, Galsulfase has been shown to improve
respiratory function, distance walked in 6 minutes, liver and spleen size and produce significant
reductions in urinary GAGs,.
While ERT is effective, such chronic treatment places a burden on the individual patient,
and is costly for society. Therefore, some guidance is judged to be necessary for the selection
of patients for treatment.
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
Patient should have a minimal level of disease severity in order to be considered for ERT.
At least one or more of the following should be present:-
Patients with FVC less than 80% of predicted value for height
c. Cardiac
d. Joint Contractures
Patients who fail to meet above criteria should be followed up in a systematic way with
annual assessments designed to detect deterioration in their clinical condition. In this way
they may be identified as suitable for treatment with ERT at a later date.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
2. The presence of severe or irreversible end organ damage that is not likely to improve with
ERT.
b. To comply with the requirement to undergo regular follow up, evaluation and,
monitoring procedures as recommended by the ERT guidelines, for the purpose of
evaluating treatment efficacy and complication of the disease.
Recommended dose regimen for Galsulfase is 1mg/kg weekly via intravenous infusion.
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/ guardians are required to sign a consent form prior to the start
of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of application (see Appendix B).
MONITORING OF THERAPY
Patient who is on subsidized ERT are monitored at regular intervals by the Technical
Committee on ERT, basing on the data that are to be collected by the treating doctor (see
Appendix E).
WITHDRAWAL OF THERAPY
b. If the patient fails to comply with the therapy, follow up, evaluation and assessment
procedure as recommended by the ERT guidelines.
1. Neufeld EF, Muenzer J. The Mucopolysaccharidoses. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B
(eds) The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID), McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap 136.
Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Valayannopoulos V, Nicely H, Harmatz P, Turbeville S. Mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010 Apr
12;5:5. Review.
3. Turbeville S, Nicely H, Rizzo JD, Pedersen TL, Orchard PJ, Horwitz ME, Horwitz EM, Veys P, Bonfim C, Al-Seraihy
A. Clinical outcomes following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis
VI. Mol Genet Metab. 2011 Feb;102(2):111-5.
4. Harmatz P. Enzyme replacement therapy with galsulfase for mucopolysaccharidosis VI: clinical facts and figures.
Turk J Pediatr. 2010 Sep-Oct;52(5):443-9. Review
5. Lin HY, Chen MR, Chuang CK, Chen CP, Lin DS, Chien YH, Ke YY, Tsai FJ, Pan HP, Lin SJ, Hwu WL, Niu DM,
Lee NC, Lin SP. Enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI-experience in Taiwan. J Inherit Metab
Dis. 2010 Oct 6. [Epub ahead of print]
6. Auclair D, Hopwood JJ, Brooks DA, Lemontt JF, Crawley AC: Replacement therapy in Mucopolysaccharidosis
type VI: advantages of early onset of therapy. Mol Genet Metab 2003, 78:163-174.
7. Harmatz P, Giugliani R, Schwartz I, Guffon N, Teles EL, Miranda MC, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy for
mucopolysaccharidosis VI: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study of recom-
binant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase (recombinant human arylsulfatase B or rhASB) and follow-on,
open-label extension study. J Pediatr 2006, 148:533-539.
8. Harmatz P, Giugliani R, Schwartz IV, Guffon N, Teles EL, Miranda MC, et al.: Long-term follow-up of endurance and
safety outcomes during enzyme replacement therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis VI: Final results of three clinical
studies of recombinant human N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase. Mol Genet Metab 2008, 94:469-475.
9. Harmatz P, Yu ZF, Giugliani R, Schwartz IV, Guffon N, Teles EL, et al. Enzyme replacement therapy for muco-
polysaccharidosis VI: evaluation of long-term pulmonary function in patients treated with recombinant human N-
acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase. J Inherit Metab Dis 2010, 33(1):51-60.
10. R Giugliani, P Harmatz, JE Wraith. Management Guidelines for Mucopolysaccharidosis VI. Pediatrics 2007;120(2)
doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2184
Website resources
1. J.E. Wraith, A. Vellodi, M.A. Cleary, U. Ramaswami, C. Lavery, Edmund Jessop. Guidelines for the Investiga-
tion and Management of Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI. www.specialisedservices.nhs.uk/.../Guidelines_for_Mu-
copolysaccharidosis_Type_VI.pdf
2. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Guidelines for the treatment of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI (MPS
VI) disease through life saving programme. www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/.../lsdp.../MPS%20VI.
doc
The classic form, occurring in males with less than 1% α-Gal A enzyme activity, usually
has its onset in childhood or adolescence with periodic crises of severe pain in the extremities
(acroparesthesias), the appearance of vascular cutaneous lesions (angiokeratomas),
hypohidrosis, characteristic corneal and lenticular opacities, and proteinuria. Gradual
deterioration of renal function to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) usually occurs in men in
the third to fifth decade. In middle age, most males successfully treated for ESRD develop
cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease, a major cause of morbidity and mortality.1,2
Males with greater than 1% α-Gal A activity may have either (1) a cardiac
variant phenotype that usually presents in the sixth to eighth decade with left ventricular
hypertrophy, mitral insufficiency and/or cardiomyopathy, and proteinuria, but without ESRD;
or (2) a renal variant phenotype associated with ESRD but without the skin lesions or pain.1,2,3
Heterozygous females typically have milder symptoms at a later age of onset than
males. Rarely, they may be relatively asymptomatic throughout a normal life span or may have
symptoms as severe as those observed in males with the classic phenotype.4
Clinical studies have demonstrated that ERT may prevent irreversible end-organ
damage in Fabry Disease from chronic GL-3 deposition. ERT has been shown to decrease pain
and to stabilize renal function.5-14
1. Citizen of Malaysia
The patient must be a citizen of Malaysia. Permanent residents are not eligible.
3. Severity of disease
Patients must meet the criteria of at least one of the following four Fabry related diseases:-
All patients:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
2. The presence of severe or irreversible end organ damage that is not likely to improve with
ERT.
b. To comply with the requirement to undergo regular follow up, evaluation and,
monitoring procedures as recommended by the ERT guidelines, for the purpose of
evaluating treatment efficacy and complication of the disease.
DRUG DOSAGE
Recommended dose regimen for agalsidase beta is 1mg/kg intravenously every two
weeks.
CONSENT FORMS
Patients or their parents/ guardians are required to sign a consent form prior to the start
of the subsidized ERT, to be submitted at the time of application (see Appendix B).
Patient who is on subsidized ERT are monitored at regular intervals by the Technical
Committee on ERT, basing on with the data that are to be collected by the treating doctor (see
Appendix F).
WITHDRAWAL OF THERAPY
b. If the patient fails to comply with the therapy, follow up, evaluation and assessment
procedure as recommended by the ERT guidelines.
1. Desnick RJ, Ioannou YA, Eng CM. Alpha-galactosidase A deficiency: Fabry disease. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL,
Sly WS, Valle D, Vogelstein B, eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (OMMBID). New
York: McGraw-Hill. Chap 150. Available at www.ommbid.com.
2. Ries M, Gupta S, Moore DF, Sachdev V, Quirk JM, Murray GJ, Rosing DR, Robinson C, Schaefer E, Gal A,
Dambrosia JM, Garman SC, Brady RO, Schiffmann R. Pediatric Fabry disease. Pediatrics. 2005;115:e344–55.
3. Linhart A, Kampmann C, Zamorano JL, Sunder-Plassmann G, Beck M, Mehta A, Elliott PM. Cardiac manifestations
of Anderson-Fabry disease: results from the international Fabry outcome survey. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1228–35.
4. Deegan PB, Baehner AF, Barba Romero MA, Hughes DA, Kampmann C, Beck M. Natural history of Fabry disease
in females in the Fabry Outcome Survey. J Med Genet. 2006;43:347–52.
5. Hoffmann B, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G, Borsini W, Ricci R, Mehta A. Nature and prevalence of pain in Fabry
disease and its response to enzyme replacement therapy--a retrospective analysis from the Fabry Outcome
Survey. Clin J Pain.2007a;23:535–42.
6. Hoffmann B, Schwarz M, Mehta A, Keshav S. Fabry Outcome Survey European Investigators; Gastrointestinal
symptoms in 342 patients with Fabry disease: prevalence and response to enzyme replacement therapy. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol.2007b;5:1447–53.
7. Hoffmann B, Garcia de Lorenzo A, Mehta A, Beck M, Widmer U, Ricci R. Effects of enzyme replacement therapy
on pain and health related quality of life in patients with Fabry disease: data from FOS (Fabry Outcome Survey). J
Med Genet.2005;42:247–52.
8. Mignani R, Panichi V, Giudicissi A, Taccola D, Boscaro F, Feletti C, Moneti G, Cagnoli L. Enzyme replacement therapy
with agalsidase beta in kidney transplant patients with Fabry disease: a pilot study. Kidney Int. 2004;65:1381–5.
9. Schiffmann R, Askari H, Timmons M, Robinson C, Benko W, Brady RO, Ries M. Weekly enzyme replacement
therapy may slow decline of renal function in patients with Fabry disease who are on long-term biweekly dosing. J
Am Soc Nephrol.2007;18:1576–83.
10. Schiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin HA, Sabnis S, Moore DF, Weibel T, Balow JE, Brady RO. Enzyme replacement
therapy in Fabry disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;285:2743–9.
11. Schwarting A, Sunder-Plassmann G, Mehta A, Beck M. Fabry Disease: Perspectives from 5 Years of FOS.
In: Mehta A, Beck M, Sunder-Plassmann G, eds. Effect of enzyme replacement therapy with agalsidase alfa
on renal function in patients with Fabry disease: data from FOS – the Fabry Outcome Survey. Oxford: Oxford
PharmaGenesis; 2006: Chapter 38.
12. Thurberg BL, Rennke H, Colvin RB, Dikman S, Gordon RE, Collins AB, Desnick RJ, O’Callaghan M.
Globotriaosylceramide accumulation in the Fabry kidney is cleared from multiple cell types after enzyme
replacement therapy. Kidney Int.2002;62:1933–46.
13. Vedder AC, Linthorst GE, Houge G, Groener JE, Ormel EE, Bouma BJ, Aerts JM, Hirth A, Hollak CE. Treatment
of Fabry disease: outcome of a comparative trial with agalsidase alfa or beta at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg. PLoS
ONE. 2007;2:e598.
Website resources
1. Department of Health and Ageing, Australia. Guidelines for the treatment of Fabry disease through life saving
drugs programe.
www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/.../Fabry%20Disease1.doc
2. D.A.Hughes, U. Ramaswam, P Elliott, P.Deegan, P. Lee, S.Waldek, G Apperley, T.Cox and A.B.Mehta for the
National Specialist Commissioning Advisory Group (NSCAG). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of
Anderson-Fabry Disease. www.dh.gov.uk › Home › Publications
3. Lorne A. Clarke, Joe T.R.Clarke, Sandra Sirrs, Michael L West, R. Mark Iwanochko, JohnR. Wherrett, Cheryl R.
Greenberg, Alicia K.J. Chan, Robin Casey. Fabry Disease: Recommendations for Diagnosis, Management, and
Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Canada. www.garrod.ca/data/.../CanadianFabryGuidelinesNov05.pdf
general conditions
for eligibility
GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ELIGIBILITY
1. Patients to be considered for financial support from the Malaysian government (Ministry
of Health) or its related health agencies (eg Ministry of Higher Education and Ministry of
Defence) for ERT treatment must be willing to participate in the long term evaluation of the
efficacy of treatment via periodic medical assessment as required by the ERT Guidelines.
2. If, depending on the natural course of the disease, there is no evidence of: (a) substantial
clinical improvement in the patient, or (b) stabilization of the patient’s condition as assessed
not later than 12 months after commencing therapy with the subsidized drug, then the
patient’s continued eligibility for financial assistance under these arrangements will be
reviewed.
3. Where the patient fails to comply adequately with the treatment or measures taken to
evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment, financial assistance under these arrangements
will be withdrawn.
BORANG PERSETUJUAN
PESAKIT
BORANG PERSETUJUAN PESAKIT
Saya telah menerangkan rawatan yang dicadangkan kepada pesakit. Secara khususnya, saya
telah menerangkan isu-isu seperti berikut:
[ ] Lain-lain: ...............................................................................................................
• Anaphylaxis
• Kesan alergi seperti ruam, gatal dan deman yang berkaitan dengan infusi ubat
[ ] seminggu sekali
Selain rawatan ERT, pesakit mungkin memerlukan rawatan multidisiplinary yang lain
seperti berikut:
.....................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
4. Ujian pemantauan:
• tidak hadir tanpa sebab untuk rawatan sebanyak 2 kali dalam tempoh 6 bulan
• tidak hadir tanpa sebab untuk ujian pemantauan sehingga menjejaskan penilaian
keberkesanan rawatan
Tandatangan: ....................................................................
Tarikh: ................................................................................
Nama: ................................................................................
Jawatan: ............................................................................
Saya telah menterjemahkan segala maklumat seperti di atas kepada pesakit ini dengan sedaya
upaya saya dan dengan cara di mana saya percaya ianya dapat difahami oleh pesakit.
Tandatangan: ............................................................................
Nama: .......................................................................................
Tarikh: .......................................................................................
Sila baca borang ini dengan teliti. Sila juga baca helaian pertama borang persetujuan ini yang telah
menghuraikan segala kebaikan, risiko, prosedur rawatan dan pemantauan yang telah dicadangkan. Seki-�����
ranya anda ada apa-apa soalan, sila kemukakan kepada kami. Kami di sini untuk membantu anda.
1. Saya telah membaca helaian pertama borang ini dan telah faham YA TIDAK
3. Saya telah dimaklumkan tentang prosedur rawatan yang perlu dipatuhi. YA TIDAK
dipatuhi.
5. Saya telahpun dimaklumkan bahawa rawatan akan ditarik balik jika saya YA TIDAK
Tandatangan: ............................................................................
Nama: .......................................................................................
Tarikh: .......................................................................................
(Untuk pesakit di bawah 18 tahun, ibubapa/penjaga akan mewakilinya untuk menandatangani borang
persetujuaan ini)
D. Saksi
Seorang saksi perlu tandatangani di bawah ini sekiranya beliau telah menyaksikan pesakit
menandatangan di atas.
Tandatangan: ............................................................................
Nama: .......................................................................................
Tarikh: .......................................................................................
Jawatan: ...................................................................................
Subsequently
3 6 12
Baseline 12-24
months months months 6 monthly
monthly
Hemoglobin X X X X X
Platelet Count X X X X X
Total white count X
Chitotriosidase X X X X X
Liver function X X
Coagulation profile X
Calcium/Phosphorus X X
Liver Volume
(Volumetric MRI or
CT) X X X
Spleen Volume
(Volumetric MRI or
CT) X X X
X-ray: AP view of
entire femora and
lateral view of spine X X1 X1
MRI (coronal; T1 &
T2-weighted) of entire
femora X X1 X1
DEXA: lumbar spine
and non-dominant
femoral neck X X X
Chest X-ray X X X
ECG/Echocardiogram X X X
Quality of Life and
Health- Related assess-
ments: X X X
PedsQLTM Measurement
Model
1
if treated for bone involvement
Patient details:
Address: ................................................................................................................................................
Doctor’s details:
Treatment details:
If yes,
Product: .....................................................................................
Dose: .........................................................................................
Frequency: ................................................................................
Confirmation of disease:
Genotype ......................................................................................................................
Histology ......................................................................................................................
Date
Hb (g/L)
Platelet count (109/L)
Visceral involvement:
Skeletal Involvement:
Please provide information to describe the patient’s experience with any of the following.
Disease biomarker:
Date
Chitotriosidase
nmol/mL/hr
1 2 3 6 12 After 12
Baseline month months months months months months
Echocardiogram1 X X X X X X 6 monthly
Electrocardiography X X X X X X 6 monthly
Chest x-ray X X X as required
Biochemical Tests (CK, X X X X X X 6 monthly
AST, LDH, ALT,urine
tetraglucoside)
Sleep study/ overnight X X as required
oxygen saturation
Respiratory X X X X X X 6 monthly
assessment2
Developmental X X X X 6 monthly
assessment
Gross Motor Func- X X X X 6 monthly
tion measure (GMF),
Walton-Gardner
Medwin Score
Swallowing X X X X 6 monthly
assessment
Audiology X X annually
CRIM status X
Antibody Levels X annually
Growth: height, X X X X X X 6 monthly
weight and head
circumference
1
measuring left ventricular mass index (LVMI), fractional shortening and ejection fraction
2
Respiratory rate, oxygen saturation on room air, requirement for non-invasive/ invasive respiratory support
1
Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test: Please refer Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 166. pp 111–
117, 2002
2
by speech therapist
3
modified Gowers’ maneuver, 10-meter walk, 4-stair climb.
Patient details:
Address: ................................................................................................................................................
Doctor’s details:
Treatment details:
If yes,
Product: .....................................................................................
Dose: .........................................................................................
Frequency: ................................................................................
Confirmation of disease:
Genotype ...............................................................................................................................................
Histology ................................................................................................................................................
Respiratory:
Tracheostomy: No [ ] Yes [ ]
Cardiology:
index
Fractional shortening
Ejection fraction
Haematology/Biochemistry:
Date
Haemoglobin (g/L)
Platelets (109/L)
Creatine Kinase (CK)
Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
If abnormal:
Neurological Examination:
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
Compliant: Yes [ ] No [ ]
Hypersensitivity: Yes [ ] No [ ]
Patient details:
Address: ................................................................................................................................................
Doctor’s details:
Treatment details:
If yes,
Product: .....................................................................................
Dose: .........................................................................................
Frequency: ................................................................................
Confirmation of disease:
Genotype ...............................................................................................................................................
Histology ................................................................................................................................................
BMI: .....................................................................
Respiratory:
Tracheostomy: No [ ] Yes [ ]
(if old enough to co-operate): ................................... (mls) ...............................(%for age and height);
Neurological Examination:
Hearing Test:
If abnormal:
Date
Haemoglobin (g/L)
Platelets (109/L)
Creatine Kinase (CK)
Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Aspartate Amino Transferase
(AST)
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
Current medication:
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
Compliant: Yes [ ] No [ ]
Hypersensitivity: Yes [ ] No [ ]
Splenomegaly1 X X X X X
Sleep Study/Over- X X X X
night O2 saturation
Pulmonary function X X X X
test
Echocardiogram2 X X X X X
Ophthalmological X X X X
Examination X
Skeletal Survey X
MRI craniocervical X X X X
junction/spine
Six minute walk test X X X X X X
IQ / Neuropsychologi- X X X X
cal tests
Full Neurological X X X X X X
Examination
Audiology X X X X
Urinary GAGs - X X X X
quantitative X
ROM of joints3 X X X X X
Quality of Life and
Health- Related
assessments: X X X X
SF-36 Health
SurveyPedsQLTM
Measurement Model
1
Ultrasound. Just clinical once normal.
2
Including ejection fraction and fractional shortening
3
Shoulder Flex/Ext & abduction; Elbow Flex/Ext; Wrist Flex/Ext; Hip Flex/Ext; Knee Flex/Ext; Ankle Flex/Ext
Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test: Please refer Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 166.
pp 111–117, 2002
Patient details:
Address: ................................................................................................................................................
Doctor’s details:
Treatment details:
If yes,
Product: .....................................................................................
Dose: .........................................................................................
Frequency: ................................................................................
Confirmation of disease:
Genotype ...............................................................................................................................................
(if old enough to co-operate): ............................(mls) ............................ (%for age and height);
Opthalmological examination:
If patient able to co-operate then measure intraocular pressure ...................................... mm Hg, and
Psychometric Testing:
Skeletal Survey including flexion and extension view of neck: Attach report
Dorsiflexion
Plantar flexion 45
Inversion 30
Eversion 25
Flexion
Extension 0
HIP 115-125
Flexion
Extension -15
Abduction 45
Adduction 20-30
Internal Rotation 30-45
External 30-45
Rotation
WRIST 90
Flexion
Extension 70
Ulnar deviation 35
Radial deviation 25
ELBOWS 145
Flexion
Extension 0
Pronation 90
Supination 90
SHOULDER
Flexion 180
Extension 0
Abduction 180
Internal rotation 65-90
External rotation 90
NECK 45
Flexion
Extension 45
Rotation 60-75
Lateral flexion 45-60
Hearing Test:
If abnormal:
Sensorineural:
Max loss - Left ear: ........................ Right ear: ........................ Shape audiogram: ...............................
Conductive:
Max loss – Left ear: ........................ Right ear: ........................ Shape audiogram: ..............................
Neurological Examination:
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
photos
Height/Weight X X
Medical history1 X X
Physical examination1 X X
Blood pressure X X
Serum Creatinine, blood urea and X X
electrolytes
Urinalysis X X
24 hour urine for protein (or urine X X
protein/creatinine ratio)
GFR2 X X
Renal biopsy X 3
Electrocardiogram X X
Echocardiography X X
Eye examination X X
Audiology X X
1
Clinical assessments focussed on the core Fabry related disease manifestations
2
GFR can be estimated using equations such as the MDRD equation for adults and Schwartz
formula for children
3
If treated for renal indication
Patient details:
Address .................................................................................................................................................
Doctor’s details:
Treatment details:
If yes,
Product: .....................................................................................
Dose: .........................................................................................
Frequency: ................................................................................
Confirmation of disease:
Genotype ...............................................................................................................................................
Histology.................................................................................................................................................
Date
Haemoglobin g/L
Platelets x109/L
White Cell Count x109/L
Total Bilirubin µmol/L
Alkaline Phosphatase u/L
GGT u/L
ALT u/L
Total cholesterol mmol/L
HDL-cholesterol
LDL-cholesterol
Triglyceride mmol/L
Blood Urea mmol/L
Plasma Creatinine µmol/L
Proteinuria mg/24 hours
Urine Alb:Cr ratio
GFR (method)
mL/min/1.73m²
Echo:
Other: ....................................................................................................................................................
ECG:
PR interval: ........................................ mm
Stress test:
Findings: ................................................................................................................................................
Findings: ................................................................................................................................................
Findings: ................................................................................................................................................
Findings:................................................................................................................................................
Findings: ...............................................................................................................................................
Cerebrovascular findings
Findings: ................................................................................................................................................
Neurology
Clinical examination:
Has this patient a history of transient ischemic attacks: Yes: ......... No: ......... Date: ...................
Has this patient had a CVA: Yes: .................. No: .................. Date: .................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................
Hearing test:
Result Date
FEV1
FVC
VC
FEF 50
FEF 25-75
Gastrointestinal findings
HOSPITAL: ………………………………………………………………………………................................
INSTRUCTIONS: This survey asks your views about your health. This information will help to keep
track of how you feel and how well you are able to do your usual activities. Please answer every
question by marking the answer as indicated. If you are unsure about how to answer a question,
please give the best answer you can. When you have completed, please return the questionnaire in
the envelope provided.
(circle one)
Excellent? ………………………………………………………………………………….. 1
Good? …………………………………………………………………………………. 3
Fair? …………………………………………………………………………………. 4
Poor? …………………………………………………………………………………. 5
2. Compared to one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now?
(circle one)
3. The following questions are about activities you might do during a typical day. Does your
health now limit you in these activities? If so, how much?
Activities Yes, limited a lot Yes, limited a little No, not limited at all
Vigorous activities, 1 2 3
such as running, lift-
ing heavy objects,
participating in strenuous
sports.
Yes No
Cut down on the amount of time you 1 2
spent on work or other activities
Accomplished less than you would like 1 2
Were limited in the kind of work or 1 2
other activities
Had difficulty performing the work or 1 2
other activities (for example, it took
extra effort)
5. During the past 4 weeks, have you had any of the following problems with your work or
other regular daily activities as a result of any emotional problems (such as feeling depressed
or anxious)?
Yes No
Cut down on the amount of time you 1 2
spent on work or other activities
Accomplished less than you would like 1 2
Didn’t do work or other activities as 1 2
carefully as usual
6. During the past 4 weeks, to what extent has your physical health or emotional problems
interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbours or groups?
(circle one)
Slightly …………………………………………………………………………………… 2
Moderately …………………………………………………………………………………… 3
Extremely …………………………………………………………………………………… 5
(circle one)
None …………………………………………………………………………………..…. 1
Mild …………………………………………………………………………………...... 3
Moderate ………………………………………………………………………………..….... 4
Severe …………………………………………………………………………………….. 5
8. During the past 4 weeks, how much did pain interfere with your normal work (including
both work outside the home and housework)?
(circle one)
Moderately …………………………………………………………………………………...... 3
Extremely …………………………………………………………………………………...... 5
10. During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has your physical health or emotional
problems interfered with your social activities (like visiting friends, relatives, etc.)?
(circle one)
I am as 1 2 3 4 5
healthy as
anybody
I know
I expect my 1 2 3 4 5
health to
get worse
My health is 1 2 3 4 5
excellent
…………………………………………………………………………………..….................................................
…………………………………………………………………………………..….................................................
The GMFM is a standardized observational instrument designed and validated to measure change in
gross motor function over time in children with cerebral palsy. The scoring key is meant to be a general
guideline. However, most of the items have specific descriptors for each score. It is imperative that the
guidelines contained in the manual be used for scoring each item.
1 = initiates
2 = partially completes
3 = completes
It is now important to differentiate a true score of “0” (child does not initiate) from an item which is Not
Tested (NT) if you are interested in using the GMFM-66 Ability Estimator Software.
1
GMFCS level is a rating of severity of motor function. Definitions are found in Appendix I of the GMFM
manual (2002).
Check (√ ) the appropriate score: if an item is not tested (NT), circle the item number in the right
column
TOTAL DIMENSION A
TOTAL DIMENSION B
TOTAL DIMENSION C
TOTAL DIMENSION D
TOTAL DIMENSION E
Was this assessment indicative of this child’s “regular” performance? YES[ ] NO[ ] COMMENTS:
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………..................................................
TOTAL SCORE = %A + %B + %C + %D + %E
Total # of Dimensions
= + + + +
5
= __________________________
5
= __________________________%
GOAL TOTAL SCORE = Sum of % scores for each dimension identified as a goal area
# of Goal areas
= %
1. Throughout our lives, most of us have had pain from time to time (such as minor headaches,
sprains and toothaches). Have you had pain other than these everyday kinds of pain today?
Yes [ ] No [ ]
2. On the diagram, shade in the areas where you feel pain. Put an “X” on the area that hurts the
most.
Front Back
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4. Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain at its least in
the last 24 hours.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. Please rate your pain by circling the one number that best describes your pain on the average.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Please rate your pain by circling the one number that tells you how much pain you have right
now.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
……………………………………………………………………………..…..................................................
8. In the last 24 hours, how much relief have pain treatments or medications provided? Please
circle the one percentage that most shows how much relief you have received.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
A. General Activity
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
B. Mood
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C. Walking Ability
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
D. Normal Work (includes both work outside the home and housework)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
F. Sleep
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
G. Enjoyment of life
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0 - no movement
1 - flicker is perceptible in the muscle
2 - movement only if gravity eliminated
3 - can move limb against gravity
4 - can move against gravity & some resistance exerted by examiner
5 - normal power
Grade 2 = Detectable defect in posture or gait. Climbs stairs without using banister.
Grade 3 = Detectable defect in posture or gait. Climbs stairs only with banisters.
Grade 7 = Unable to walk. Sits erect in a chair. Able to roll wheelchair and eat and drink
normally.
Grade 8 = Sits unsupported in a chair. Unable to roll wheelchair or unable to drink from a
glass unassisted.
Grade 9 = Unable to sit erect without support or unable to eat or drink without assistance.
Grade 1 = Starting with arms at sides, the patient is capable to abduct the arms in a full circle
until the handbacks touch above the head.
Grade 2 = Can raise arms above only by flexing the elbow (i.e., shortening the circumference
of the movement) or using accessory muscles.
Grade 3 = Cannot raise hands above head but can raise an 8 oz. glass/cup of water to mouth
(using both hands if necessary). When raising glass to mouth, the patient may not
lower his head to reach the glass.
Grade 4 = Can raise hands to mouth but cannot raise an 8 oz. glass/cup of water to mouth.
ADVISOR
Y.Bhg Dato’ Dr Azmi Shapie
Director
Medical Development Division
Ministry of Health
AUTHORS
Dr Keng Wee Teik
Consultant Clinical Geneticist
Kuala Lumpur Hospital
SECRETARIAT
Y.Bhg. Datuk Dr. Noor Hisham bin Abdullah, Deputy Director General of
Health (Medical) and Y.Bhg. Dato’ Dr. Azmi bin Shapie, Director of Medical
Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia for their
continuing support and services rendered;
All members of the committee for their contributions in drawing up the guideline;
And last but not least to all those who provided valuable input and
feedback to make this publication a success.
http://www.moh.gov.my