Shen 2012
Shen 2012
Similar to the popular older cousins, luminescent carbon dots (C-dots), graphene quantum dots
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
or graphene quantum discs (GQDs) have generated enormous excitement because of their
superiority in chemical inertness, biocompatibility and low toxicity. Besides, GQDs, consisting of
a single atomic layer of nano-sized graphite, have the excellent performances of graphene, such as
high surface area, large diameter and better surface grafting using p–p conjugation and surface
groups. Because of the structure of graphene, GQDs have some other special physical properties.
Therefore, studies on GQDs in aspects of chemistry, physical, materials, biology and
interdisciplinary science have been in full flow in the past decade. In this Feature Article,
recent developments in preparation of GQDs are discussed, focusing on the main two approaches
(top-down and bottom-down). Emphasis is given to their future and potential development in
bioimaging, electrochemical biosensors and catalysis, and specifically in photovoltaic devices that
can solve increasingly serious energy problems.
3686 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
They can be prepared by laser ablation of graphite,14,15 hazards of QDs, GQDs are at the center of significant research
electrochemical oxidation of graphite,16 supported routes,17 efforts to develop low-toxicity, eco-friendly alternatives that
electrochemical soaking of carbon nanotubes,18 thermal oxidation have the desirable performance characteristics of QDs. It is
of suitable molecular precursors,19,20 from the combustion our aim that the development of this knowledge will offer
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
soot of candles21 or natural gas,22 proton-beam irradiation valuable insights; moreover, we hope to inspire research
of nanodiamonds,23 microwave synthesis,24 and so on.25–27 into the origins of the unique properties of emerging novel
Very recently, Zhu et al. have reported a simple bottom-up fluorescent materials such as BN quantum dots, Si quantum
synthesis method for C-dots by using a mesoporous silica dots, nanodiamonds, etc., and to encourage their exploration
microspheres template.28 They proposed the concept of confined in electrochemical biosensors, bioimaging, drug delivery and
reaction in nanoreactors to prepare nanoparticles (Fig. 1). energy conversion.
In addition to the above properties, graphene quantum dots
or graphene quantum discs (GQDs), as a kind of C-dots, have
the excellent performance of graphene. Over the past few 2. Synthetic methods
decades, graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms in a
Approaches for synthesizing GQDs with tunable size can be
honeycomb structure, has generated enormous excitement due
generally classified into two main groups: top-down and
to its large surface area,29,30 high carrier transport mobility,31,32
bottom-up methods (Fig. 3). Top-down approaches refer to
superior mechanical flexibility33 and excellent thermal/chemical
the cutting of graphene sheets into GQDs, the method consists
stability.34–37 With bulk graphene having a zero bandgap, in
of chemical ablation, electrochemical oxidation, and oxygen
principle the bandgap of graphenes can be tuned from 0 eV to
plasma treatment, where GQDs are formed or ‘‘broken off’’
that of benzene by varying their sizes.38–40 To facilitate the
from larger graphene sheets. Bottom-up methods involve the
application of graphene in nanodevices and effectively tune the
synthesis of graphene moieties containing a certain number of
bandgap of graphenes, a promising approach is to convert
conjugated carbon atoms, the approaches consist, for example,
the 2D graphene sheets into 0D GQDs. These GQDs exhibit
of the cage-opening of fullerene, or solution chemistry methods
new phenomena due to quantum confinement and edge effects,
during which the GQDs are formed from molecular precursors.
which are similar to C-dots. However, the disadvantage is that
Typically, these GQDs have surfaces rich in carboxylic acid
C-dots possess size effects, and quasi-spherical nanoparticles
functionalities which can be used to bind surface-passivation
with sizes below 10 nm.13 Therefore, GQDs and their chemical
reagents.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3687
View Article Online
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
Fig. 2 (a) Depiction of GQDs and (b) structural models after func-
tionalization with surface-passivation reagents.
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
3688 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3689
View Article Online
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
3690 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3691
View Article Online
there must be a higher quantum confinement of emissive respectively (Fig. 14b). Remarkably, the shifting between the
energy trapped to the GQDs surface so that the GQDs with energy of upconverted emission light (Em) and excitation light
surface-passivation exhibit stronger PL.71 (Ex) was almost unchanged, about 1.1 eV. To further confirm
Besides the factors described above, there are other factors and explain these experimental observations, an energy level
that can influence the PL performance. As Chhowalla reported structural model of the GQDs was proposed to investigate the
the PL intensity was found to vary with reduction treatment UCPL properties. UCPL was speculated as due to anti-Stokes
by hydrazine vapor, which can be correlated to the evolution photoluminescence (ASPL), where DE between the p and s
of very small sp2 clusters.45 Gokus et al. discovered the PL orbitals was near 1.1 eV. The energy levels of p and s orbitals
intensity and thickness of graphene were directly correlated, as were determined by the carbene ground-state multiplicity.73–75
seen in Fig. 13 for flakes of different thickness.52 The single- As shown in Fig. 14c, when a number of low-energy photons
layer graphene showed pronounced PL, but a different behavior excite the electrons of the p orbital, the p electrons would
was observed for multilayer graphene. Oxygen plasma etching undergo transition to a higher energy state such as the LUMO,
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
proceeds layer-by-layer, and bi- and multilayer flakes remained and then the electrons would relax back to a lower energy
nonluminescent, thus implying that emission from the topmost state. Thus, an upconverted PL is emitted when the electrons
layer was quenched by subjacent untreated layers. return back to the s orbital. Although the electrons of the
s orbital can also undergo transition they only can emit
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
3692 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
(150 mg L1). (b) Effect of GQDs on MG-63 cell viability. Reprinted The presence of adatoms or corrugations is found to modify
with permission from refs. 41 and 43. Copyright 2008 and 2011. the spin–orbit coupling in GQDs.87,88 It could also be altered
into multilayered graphene.89 Recent measurements consistent
of the carbon fluorescent materials will lead to replacement of with the presence of local moments in graphene have been
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
current FDA-approved dyes used as optical imaging agents, reported and magnetism in GQDs has been the subject of
such as indocyanine green (LD50 = 60 mg kg1 body extensive studies in recent years.90–93 For example, Viana-Gomes
weight).77 et al. has studied magnetism in GQDs of particular geometries
with and without zigzag edges. Similarly to what had been
3.3. Other physical properties
proposed in the context of graphene nanoribbons, the magnetism
Besides the properties described above, there are other displayed by these systems may be used in spin filters.90 A large
excellent properties of GQDs due to the physical structure of number of theoretical works suggested that the formation of
graphene.78–80 GQDs were shown to be both excellent electron local moments were at GQD edges and other defects. The
donors and acceptors.40,81 Li et al. prepared GQDs with a interactions between these local moments could be modified by
uniform and tunable size by solution chemistry methods, and gate voltages, dopants and other sources of disorder, and strains.
showed some special properties of GQDs and their opto- The expected distribution of local moments at GQDs and
electronic applications such as in photodetectors and solar graphene ribbon edges are shown in Fig. 16.
cells.59–64 They synthesized disk-shaped nanostructures materials
by assembly the colloidal GQDs on polar surfaces and the
4. Applications
control of their orientations. They showed that the orientations
of the GQDs could be determined, either in- or out-of-plane 4.1. Bioimaging
with the substrate, by chemical functionalization that intro-
Traditional semiconductor quantum dots such as CdSe or CdS
duces orientation-dependent interactions between the quantum
and their core–shell nanoparticles have been used in various
dots and the surfaces.60 The orientation control of the GQDs
in vitro or in vivo optical imaging experiments.94,95 However,
could have practical significance in determining their perfor-
these QDs dots have prompted serious health and environ-
mance in devices. For example, for use as sensitizers in dye-
mental concerns due to the heavy metal elements in them.95 As
sensitized solar cells, orientation control through chemical
a consequence of their tunable and strong PL properties,
functionalization could also be applied to aligning graphene
established low toxicity and eco-friendly nature, GQDs are
nanoribbons to take advantage of their outstanding charge
an attractive alternative for bioimaging applications.
transport properties for electro-optical applications. In addition,
Zhu and co-workers reported the use of a coaxial electro-
Li et al. first reported on the studies of electronic energy
spray method to the one-step fabrication of multifunctional
relaxation pathways in colloidal GQDs with uniform size.62
core–shell structured capsules, which possessed magnetic
They discovered that the photoexcited GQDs had a significant
targeting and fluorescence imaging functions.96 The TiO2 shell
probability of relaxing into triplet states and emitted both
suppressed the initial burst release of paclitaxel while Fe3O4
phosphorescence and fluorescence at room temperature, with
and GQDs inside the oil core functioned successfully for
relative intensities depending on the excitation energy. Because
magnetic targeting and fluorescence imaging, respectively.
of the long lifetime and reactivity of triplet electronic states,
they predicted that their results could have significant implica-
tions for applications of graphenes. Then, they showed that
carrier cooling in GQDs could be two orders of magnitude
slower than in bulk materials, which could enable harvesting
of hot charge carriers to improve the efficiency of solar energy
conversion.64 The slow hot-carrier relaxation in GQDs made it
possible to reveal other normally slow relaxation pathways
that were otherwise difficult to observe. Intersystem crossing
is generally much slower than internal conversion since it Fig. 16 (a) Sketch of the magnetization in a graphene ribbon with
involves a change in spin multiplicity. It could be enhanced zigzag edges. (b) Magnetization near the edges of a graphene quantum
in GQDs due to the reduced singlet–triplet splitting in such dot. Reprinted with permission from ref. 84. Copyright 2011.
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3693
View Article Online
co-workers covalently conjugated a B-cell specific antibody (b) NIR fluorescence image of CD20 positive Raji B-cells treated with
Rituxan (anti-CD20) to nanographene oxide PEG in order to the nanographene oxide PEG–Rituxan conjugate. The scale bar shows
the intensity of total NIR emission (in the range 1100–2200 nm).
selectively recognize and bind to B-cell lymphoma cells. B- and
Images are false-colored green. (c) NIR fluorescence image of CD20
T-cells were incubated in solutions of nanographene oxide–PEG
negative CEM T-Cells treated with nanographene oxide PEG-Rituxan
Rituxan conjugates at 4 1C to allow the conjugates to interact conjugate. (d) Mean NIR fluorescence intensities in the image area for
with the cell surface but block internalization via endocytosis.97 the both the positive (Raji) and negative (CEM) cells treated by nano-
The cells were imaged by detecting NIR PL in the range graphene oxide PEG Rituxan conjugate. Reprinted with permission
1100–2200 nm using a InGaAs detector under 658 nm laser from ref. 41. Copyright 2008.
excitation (laser spot size B1 mm, Fig. 18b and c). This confirmed
selective nanographene oxide-PEG-Ab binding to B- over T-cells
(Fig. 18d). Owing to its small size, intrinsic optical properties,
large specific surface area, low cost, and useful non-covalent
interactions with aromatic drug molecules, nanographene
oxide is a promising new material for biological and medical
applications.
Zhu et al. also used GQDs for conventional bioimaging by
incubating a 104 cells/150 mL solution of MG-63 (human
osteosarcoma) cells with suspensions (2.5 mg mL1) of GQDs Fig. 19 Cellular imaging of GQDs; (a–c) are washed cells imaged
from a stock solution with Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer saline under bright field, 405 and 488 nm excitations, respectively. Reprinted
(DPBS).43 MG-63 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified with permission from ref. 43. Copyright 2011.
Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (DMEM). The GQDs were the excess GQDs were removed by washing three times with
produced by a one-step solvothermal method with PL quantum warm DPBS. GQDs uptake and bioimaging experiments were
yield as high as 11.4%. Then, after sonication for 10 min to performed by the confocal fluorescence microscope as shown
ensure complete dispersion, an aliquot (typically 0.01 mL) of in Fig. 19. Observation of the bright green area inside the cells
the suspension was added to the well of a chamber slide indicated translocation of GQDs through the cell’s membrane
containing the cells cultured for 24 h. The chamber slide was (405 nm excitation). The excitation-dependent PL behavior of
then incubated at 37 1C in a CO2 incubator for 12 h for GQDs the GQDs gave rise to impressive visible results. When the
uptake (only 10 mg of GQDs to 150 mL of culture medium excitation light was changed to 488 nm a green–yellow color
(104 cells) was added). Prior to fixation of the cells on the was observed (Fig. 19c).
slide for inspection with a confocal fluorescence microscope, As shown in previous publications, cellular toxicity data
showed high biocompatibility and low toxicity of GQDs.
However, further experiments should be provided for in vitro
and in vivo applications, and for actual applications in the
human body.
3694 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3695
View Article Online
5. Outlook
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
Although much research for GQDs has been done the detailed
mechanism and chemical species responsible for PL in GQDs
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
3696 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
such as generally presenting a blue luminescence which was not 5.4. Newer quantum dot materials
conducive to biological imaging, and other luminescence including
In addition to C-dots and GQDs, many newer quantum dots
UCPL which is relatively weaker. In addition, solar cells with
have been discovered and researched recently, such as h-BN
GQDs usually have relatively lower efficiency (o2%). However
nanosheets or BCNO nanoparticles,106 nanodiamonds,107
the initial work on GQDs for solar cells or bioimaging are very
fluorescent silicon quantum dots (SiQDs)108–110 and so on.
promising. As discussed below, future research efforts towards
He et al. presented a microwave-assisted method for one-pot
better controlled synthesis, surface functionalization, metal
synthesis of water-dispersible SiQDs using silicon nanowires
enhanced fluorescence and new quantum dot materials are
and glutaric acid as precursors.110 Their prepared SiQDs,
expected to result in even higher performance.
which feature excellent aqueous dispersibility, robust photo-
5.1. New methods for the synthesis of GQDs and pH-stability, strong fluorescence (about 15%), and favor-
able sizes (about 4 nm), were readily and rapidly prepared in
Synthesis of high quality GQDs with well controlled size, short reaction times. We speculate that the new quantum dot
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
shape and surface functionalization needs to be further explored. materials may provide biological probes for long-term and
GQDs prepared by the top-down approaches are usually difficult real-time immunofluorescent cellular imaging, which can over-
to control in terms of size and shape. Therefore, we speculate the come the disadvantages of GQDs.
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3697
View Article Online
20 A. B. Bourlinos, A. Stassinopoulos, D. Anglos, R. Zboril, 55 J.-L. Chen and X.-P. Yan, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 3135–3137.
V. Georgakilas and E. P. Giannelis, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 56 D. V. Kosynkin, A. L. Higginbotham, A. Sinitskii, J. R. Lomeda,
4539–4541. A. Dimiev, B. K. Price and J. M. Tour, Nature, 2009, 458,
21 H. P. Liu, T. Ye and C. Mao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 872–876.
6473–6475. 57 L. Jiao, L. Zhang, X. Wang, G. Diankov and H. Dai, Nature,
22 L. Tian, D. Ghosh, W. Chen, S. Pradhan, X. J. Chang and 2009, 458, 877–880.
S. W. Chen, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 2803–2809. 58 J. Lu, P. S. E. Yeo, C. K. Gan, P. Wu and K. P. Loh,
23 S. J. Yu, M. W. Kang, H. C. Chang, K. M. Chen and Y. C. Yu, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6, 247–252.
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17604–17605. 59 X. Yan, X. Cui and L.-S. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
24 H. Zhu, X. L. Wang, Y. L. Li, Z. J. Wang, F. Wang and 5944–5945.
X. R. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5118–5120. 60 I. P. Hamilton, B. Li, X. Yan and L.-S. Li, Nano Lett., 2011, 11,
25 M. Bottini, C. Balasubramanian, M. I. Dawson, A. Bergamaschi, 1524–1529.
S. Bellucci and T. Mustelin, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 831–836. 61 L.-S. Li and X. Yan, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1, 2572–2576.
26 X. Wang, L. Cao, F. S. Lu, M. J. Meziani, H. Li, G. Qi, B. Zhou, 62 M. L. Mueller, X. Yan, J. A. McGuire and L.-S. Li, Nano Lett.,
B. A. Harruff, F. Kermarrec and Y. P. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2010, 10, 2679–2682.
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
2009, 3774–3776. 63 X. Yan, X. Cui, B. S. Li and L.-S. Li, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 1869–1873.
27 L. Tian, Y. Song, X. J. Chang and S. W. Chen, Scr. Mater., 2010, 64 M. L. Mueller, X. Yan, B. Dragnea and L.-S. Li, Nano Lett.,
62, 883–886. 2011, 11, 56–60.
28 J. Zong, Y. H. Zhu, X. L. Yang, J. H. Shen and C. Z. Li, Chem. 65 R. Liu, D. Wu, X. Feng and K. Mullen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
Commun., 2011, 47, 764–766. 133, 15221–15223.
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
29 K. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Yang and C. Li, New J. Chem., 2010, 34, 66 C. D. Simpson, J. D. Brand, A. J. Berresheim, L. Przybilla,
2950–2955. H. J. Rader and K. Mullen, Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 1424–1429.
30 K. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Yang and C. Li, Electroanalysis, 2011, 23, 67 J. Wu, W. Pisula and K. Mullen, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 718–747.
862–869. 68 J. Wu, Z. Tomovic, V. Enkelmann and K. Mullen, J. Org. Chem.,
31 J. Shen, Y. Zhu, K. Zhou, X. Yang and C. Li, J. Mater. Chem., 2004, 69, 5179–5186.
2012, 22, 545–550. 69 W. S. Hummers and R. E. Offeman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80,
32 K. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Yang, J. Luo, C. Li and S. Luan, Electrochim. 1339–1339.
Acta, 2010, 55, 3055–3060. 70 H. T. Li, X. D. He, Z. H. Kang, H. Huang, Y. Liu, J. L. Liu,
33 K. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Yang, X. Jiang and C. Li, New J. Chem., S. Y. Lian, C. H. A. Tsang, X. B. Yang and S. T. Lee, Angew.
2011, 35, 353–359. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 4430–4434.
34 K. Zhou, Y. Zhu, X. Yang and C. Li, Electroanalysis, 2010, 22, 71 Y. P. Sun, B. Zhou, Y. Lin, W. Wang, K. A. S. Fernando,
259–264. P. Pathak, M. J. Meziani, B. A. Harruff, X. Wang, H. F. Wang,
35 A. K. Geim, Science, 2009, 324, 1530–1534. P. J. G. Luo, H. Yang, M. E. Kose, B. Chen, L. M. Veca and
36 S. Stankovich, D. A. Dikin, G. H. B. Dommett, K. M. Kohlhaas, S. Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 7756–7757.
E. J. Zimney, E. A. Stach, R. D. Piner, S. B. T. Nguyen and 72 L. Cao, X. Wang, M. J. Meziani, F. Lu, H. Wang, P. G. Luo,
R. S. Ruoff, Nature, 2006, 442, 282–286. Y. Lin, B. A. Harruff, L. M. Veca, D. Murray, S.-Y. Xie and
37 X. J. Xie, H. Bai, G. Q. Shi and L. T. Qu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, Y.-P. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11318–11319.
21, 2057–2059. 73 L. R. Radovic and B. Bockrath, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
38 K. Nakada, M. Fujita, G. Dresselhaus and M. S. Dresselhaus, 5917–5927.
Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1996, 54, 17954–17961. 74 A. Mehta, E. J. Nelson, S. M. Webb and J. K. Holt, Adv. Mater.,
39 Y. W. Son, M. L. Cohen and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 2009, 21, 102–106.
97, 216803–216806. 75 A. M. Trozzolo and W. A. Gibbons, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1967, 89,
40 J. Shen, Y. Zhu, X. Yang, J. Zong, J. Zhang and C. Li, New J. 239–243.
Chem., 2012, 36, 97–101. 76 S. C. Ray, A. Saha, N. R. Jana and R. Sarkar, J. Phys. Chem. C,
41 X. Sun, Z. Liu, K. Welsher, J. T. Robinson, A. Goodwin, S. Zaric 2009, 113, 18546–18551.
and H. Dai, Nano Res., 2008, 1, 203–212. 77 S.-T. Yang, X. Wang, H. Wang, F. Lu, P. G. Luo, L. Cao,
42 D. Pan, J. Zhang, Z. Li and M. Wu, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, M. J. Meziani, J.-H. Liu, Y. Liu, M. Chen, Y. Huang and
734–738. Y.-P. Sun, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 18110–18114.
43 S. Zhu, J. Zhang, C. Qiao, S. Tang, Y. Li, W. Yuan, B. Li, 78 S. Guo and S. Dong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 2644–2672.
L. Tian, F. Liu, R. Hu, H. Gao, H. Wei, H. Zhang, H. Sun and 79 L. J. Cote, J. Kim, V. C. Tung, J. Luo, F. Kim and J. Huang,
B. Yang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6858–6860. Pure Appl. Chem., 2011, 83, 95–110.
44 J. Shen, Y. Zhu, C. Chen, X. Yang and C. Li, Chem. Commun., 80 H. C. Schniepp, J.-L. Li, M. J. McAllister, H. Sai, M. Herrera-
2011, 47, 2580–2582. Alonso, D. H. Adamson, R. K. Prud’homme, R. Car, D. A.
45 G. Eda, Y.-Y. Lin, C. Mattevi, H. Yamaguchi, H.-A. Chen, Saville and I. A. Aksay, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 8535–8539.
I.-S. Chen, C.-W. Chen and M. Chhowalla, Adv. Mater., 2010, 22, 81 V. Gupta, N. Chaudhary, R. Srivastava, G. D. Sharma, R. Bhardwaj
505–509. and S. Chand, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9960–9963.
46 J. Robertson and E. P. O’Reilly, Phys. Rev. B, 1987, 35, 2946–2957. 82 A. J. Nozik, Phys. E., 2002, 14, 115–120.
47 Q. L. Zhao, Z. L. Zhang, B. H. Huang, J. Peng, M. Zhang and 83 A. J. Nozik, Nano Lett., 2010, 10, 2735–2741.
D. W. Pang, Chem. Commun., 2008, 5116–5118. 84 F. Guinea, M. A. H. Vozmediano, M. P. Lopez-Sancho and
48 L. Zheng, Y. Chi, Y. Dong, J. Lin and B. Wang, J. Am. Chem. J. Gonzalez, Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 5324–5326.
Soc., 2009, 131, 4564–4565. 85 N. Tombros, C. Jozsa, M. Popinciuc, H. T. Jonkman and
49 J. Lu, J. X. Yang, J. Z. Wang, A. Lim, S. Wang and K. P. Loh, B. J. van-Wees, Nature, 2007, 448, 571–574.
ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 2367–2375. 86 W. Han and R. K. Kawakami, arXiv, 2010, 1012, 3435–3435.
50 Y. Li, Y. Hu, Y. Zhao, G. Shi, L. Deng, Y. Hou and L. Qu, 87 A. H. Castro-Neto and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009, 103,
Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 776–780. 026804–026807.
51 J. Wang, X. Xin and Z. Lin, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 3040–3048. 88 D. Huertas-Herrero, F. Guinea and A. Brataas, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
52 T. Gokus, R. R. Nalr, A. Bonettl, M. Bohmler, A. Lombardo, 2009, 103, 146801–146804.
K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Gelm, A. C. Ferrarl and A. Hartschuh, 89 F. Guinea, New J. Phys., 2010, 12, 083063–083071.
ACS Nano, 2009, 3, 3963–3968. 90 J. Viana-Gomes, V. M. Pereira and N. M. R. Peres, Phys. Rev. B:
53 C. Casiraghi, A. Hartschuh, E. Lidorikis, H. Qian, Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2009, 80, 245436–245446.
H. Harutyunyan, T. Gokus, K. S. Novoselov and A. C. Ferrari, 91 J. Guttinger, C. Stampfer, T. Frey, T. Ihn and K. Ensslin,
Nano Lett., 2007, 7, 2711–2717. Phys. Status Solidi B, 2009, 246, 2553–2557.
54 A. C. Ferrari, J. C. Meyer, V. Scardaci, C. Casiraghi, F. Mauri, 92 M. Sepioni, R. R. Nair, S. Rablen, J. Narayanan, F. Tuna,
S. Piscanec, S. Piscanec, D. Jiang, K. S. Novoselov, S. Roth and R. Winpenny, A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
A. K. Geim, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2006, 97, 187401–187404. 2010, 105, 207205–207208.
3698 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Article Online
93 A. D. Güçlü, P. Potasz, O. Voznyy, M. Korkusinski and 103 K. Ray, R. Badugu and J. R. Lakowicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
P. Hawrylak, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009, 103, 246805–246808. 128, 8998–8999.
94 X. H. Gao, L. L. Yang, J. A. Petros, F. F. Marshal, J. W. Simons 104 C. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Zhang, X. Yang and C. Li, RSC Adv., 2012,
and S. M. Nie, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2005, 16, 63–72. 2, 1765.
95 R. Hardman, Environ. Health Perspect., 2006, 114, 165–172. 105 J. Yang, F. Zhang, Y. Chen, S. Qian, P. Hu, W. Li, Y. Deng,
96 Y. Jing, Y. Zhu, X. Yang, J. Shen and C. Li, Langmuir, 2011, 27, Y. Fang, L. Han, M. Luqman and D. Zhao, Chem. Commun.,
1175–1180. 2011, 47, 11618–11620.
97 N. W. S. Kam, Z. A. Liu and H. J. Dai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 106 W. Li, D. Portehault, R. Dimova and M. Antonietti, J. Am.
2006, 45, 577–581. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 7121–7127.
98 J. Zhao, G. Chen, L. Zhu and G. Li, Electrochem. Commun., 107 K.-Y. Niu, H.-M. Zheng, Z.-Q. Li, J. Yang and X.-W. Du,
2011, 13, 31–33. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 4099–4102.
99 Y. Li, Y. Zhao, H. Cheng, Y. Hu, G. Shi, L. Dai and L. Qu, 108 T. M. Atkins, A. Thibert, D. S. Larsen, S. Dey, N. D. Browning and
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 15–18. S. M. Kauzlarich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 20664–20667.
100 K. P. Gong, F. Du, Z. H. Xia, M. Durstock and L. M. Dai, Science, 109 M. L. Mastronardi, F. Hennrich, E. J. Henderson, F. Maier-Flaig,
2009, 323, 760–764. C. Blum, J. Reichenbach, U. Lemmer, C. Kubel, D. Wang, M. M.
Published on 21 February 2012 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2CC00110A
101 R. L. Liu, D. Q. Wu, X. L. Feng and K. Mullen, Angew. Chem., Kappes and G. A. Ozin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 11928–11931.
Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 2565–2569. 110 Y. He, Y. Zhong, F. Peng, X. Wei, Y. Su, Y. Lu, S. Su,
102 Z.-J. Zhou, Z.-B. Liu, Z.-R. Li, X.-R. Huang and C.-C. Sun, W. Gu, L. Liao and S.-L. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 16282–16286. 14192–14195.
Downloaded by University of Illinois - Urbana on 19 March 2013
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3686–3699 3699