IF3108 Corporate Finance Week 1 Lecture Slides
IF3108 Corporate Finance Week 1 Lecture Slides
Bayes BS
Decision rules
Our plan
Should we hire a
Should we acquire firm different CTO? How
X? How much should we much can we spend to
pay? hire a good professional?
Should we export to
India? Should we
hedge currency risk?
Taxes (D)
Total firm value
Total asset value to investors
CASH FLOW: How not to run out of cash? How to generate cash flows?
Managers’ objectives
Both these issues are pivotal for the long-term success of any business entity. In our
course, however, we will focus on how to maximize shareholder value. That said, the hope
is that that value will serve some purpose; executed by the company of its shareholders.
FINANCIAL MARKETS
FINANCIAL MARKETS
Main Goal: Develop a set of tools for making good financial decisions.
To evaluate any economic or financial decision:
• We want to “sum up” all the different elements
• costs and benefits
• Need to convert elements to common denominator
• Usually $ (£, ¥, €, etc.)
• Market prices allow us to do the conversion
• Future value (FV): Converts dollars today into dollars at some point in the
future.
• Moving money forward in time (“compounding").
• The units of FV are dollars at some time t.
Definition:
You have an amount F at some future date. The Present Value (PV) of F is
the amount that one would need to invest today to have F at that future point
in time.
In general, the present value of a cash flow F that arrives n periods from now is:
𝑭𝑽
𝑷𝑽 =
(𝟏 + 𝒓)𝒏
Example
Suppose that you can invest at 5%, how much would you need to invest
today in order to have $100 in one year? in two years?
Basic principle: To calculate the total PV of a set of cash flows, sum the PVs
of the individual cash flows.
• In other words, once we have converted the cash flows into the same
units, we can just add them up.
Present Value of Multiple Cash Flows (often called NPV – Net Present Value – when we add all
costs and benefits). The PV of a stream of cash flows is given by:
𝐶1 𝐶2 𝐶𝑛
𝑃𝑉 = 𝐶0 + + + ⋯ +
(1 + 𝑟)1 (1 + 𝑟)2 (1 + 𝑟)𝑛
NPV = PV (All project cash flows)
Strategy II:
Date 0 1 2 3
Cash Flow -400 -100 350 350
NPV 124.6
NPV means net present value. It's often used instead of PV to indicate that some of the
cash flows are negative.
Definition:
You have an amount P today. The Future Value (FV) of P is the
amount you will have at some point in the future if you invest P today.
In general, the future value, n periods from now, of a cash flow P is:
𝐹𝑉 = 𝑃𝑉 ∗ 1 + 𝑟 ∗ ⋯ ∗ (1 + 𝑟)
𝐹𝑉 = 𝑃𝑉 ∗ (1 + 𝑟)𝑛
Example
A bank pays 3% per year on a 5-year CD (certificate of deposit) and you deposit $1000. What
is the FV of your investment? How much money will you have in 2 years?
This gets very boring when there are 360 cash flows!
There are two types of cash flows that we will encounter frequently. There
are formulas which make them easy to compute:
1. Perpetuities: payments each period, indefinitely
e.g., dividend payments of a firm
2. Annuities: payments each period, for n periods
e.g., mortgage/loan payments, pension payments
PV = 25/0.04=625
• What if g>r?
Corp Fin – Paulina Roszkowska 29
Annuity
A growing annuity provides a cash flow of $C at the end of this period, with
subsequent cash flows growing at a rate of g each period and lasting for n
periods.
𝐶 1+𝑔 𝑛
𝑃𝑉 𝐺𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 = ∗ (1 − ( ) )
𝑟−𝑔 1+𝑟
1. Brute force: compute PV (or FV) of each individual cash flow and sum
them up.
where:
• n - number of payments
• r - interest rate per payment period
• PV - (-) present value (principal)
• FV - future value (face value).
• PMT - constant periodic payment amount.
• The key concept: even though it’s stated as a 10% rate, if it’s
compounded more frequently than annually, £100 invested at the
beginning of the year will be worth more than £110 at the end of the
year.
£100
Balance after 6 months: 100 (1+.05) = 105
Balance after 1 year: 105 (1+.05) = 110.25
Other way by moving 2 periods: 100 (1+.05)2 = 110.25
Since £100 has grown to £110.25 in a year’s time, we have earned an effective rate of
10.25% (Effective Annual Rate or EAR)
Corp Fin – Paulina Roszkowska 35
APR vs. EAR
APR and EAR are different ways of expressing interest rates. They can be
converted to each other.
Effective annual rate (EAR): The interest rate you actually earn/pay per year, taking account
of interest on interest. When we compound k times per year:
𝑘
𝐴𝑃𝑅
1 + 𝐸𝐴𝑅 = 1 +
𝑘
No. of years
k EAR
1 5 10 40
1 6.000% 106.00 133.82 179.08 1028.57
2 6.090% 106.09 134.39 180.61 1064.09
4 6.136% 106.14 134.69 181.40 1082.85
6 6.152% 106.15 134.78 181.67 1089.26
12 6.168% 106.17 134.89 181.94 1095.75
365 6.183% 106.18 134.98 182.20 1102.10
Arbitrage: The practice of buying and selling equivalent goods in different markets to take
advantage of a price difference. An arbitrage opportunity occurs when it is possible to make a
profit without taking any risk or making any investment.
We will use this logic (No Arbitrage & Law of One Price) throughout the course.
• The theory underlying this conclusion relies on competitive markets.
• The law of one price also has implications for packages of securities.
Consider two securities, A and B. Suppose a third security, C, has the same
cash flows as A and B combined. In this case, security C is equivalent to a
portfolio, or combination, of the securities A and B.
• Shortcuts to PV
Annuities, perpetuities and rules of time travel
When you need to make a financial decision to pick projects that create
value, you are doing nothing else but… capital budgeting. When you are
valuation projects/companies, you are doing nothing else but… estimating
how much value they add/create.
3 steps to do that:
1. Project cash flows – class 9
2. Estimate the cost of capital (the “right” discount rate) – class 2
3. Employ a decision rule - class 1 today
• NPV, IRR, MIRR, PI, PP, best-case analysis
Intuition: NPV reflects the value added to the firm when the project is taken
• Value added to the firm (added market value) = value that accrues to the
equity holders
• Value of all benefits minus value of all costs
• Imagine that each project was financed separately (like project finance)
• Outside investors would put up all the money required for the investment
in exchange for some promise of future cash flows
https://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~charvey/Research/Published_Papers/P76_How_do_CFOs.pdf
Profitability index:
• Maximizes overall NPV from a set of projects when you face a constraint.
Better than just picking projects in order of decreasing NPV.
APV (adjusted PV): NPV where you account for the tax benefits of debt.
Real options theory: Allows us to maximize NPV when the project has embedded options, e.g., the option to shut down
early if bad news arrives. It is a way to value flexibility.
Note: Any method producing results that differ from NPV is WRONG. Use such
methods with great care.
• IRR rule is the most popular alternative method, since it is intuitive and usually gives the right
result.
A project’s IRR = the interest rate that sets the NPV of cash flows equal to zero:
𝐶1 𝐶2 𝐶𝑛
0 = 𝐶0 + + +⋯+
(1+𝐼𝑅𝑅)1 (1+𝐼𝑅𝑅)2 (1+𝐼𝑅𝑅)𝑛
• If projects are independent, accept a project if the IRR is greater than the opportunity cost of
capital (IRR>r).
• If projects are mutually exclusive, accept the one with the highest IRR, provided it is greater
than the opportunity cost of capital.
35
NPV = − 250 +
r
At 14%, the NPV=0, so the project’s IRR is 14%. For ABC, if its cost of capital
estimate is more than 14%, the NPV will be negative.
The difference between the cost of capital and the IRR is the maximum
amount of estimation error in the cost of capital estimate that can exist
without altering the original decision.
• The IRR is useful to know even if you use the NPV decision rule.
• It tells you how high the cost of capital can be before the NPV goes
negative.
• Most of the time, these rules are equivalent
• But not always…
→ Pitfalls of IRR ☺
• All projects (even “abnormal” ones) have one and only one NPV.
• Suppose you inform the publisher that it needs to sweeten the deal before
you will accept it. The publisher offers $550,000 in advance and $1,000,000 in
4 years when the book is published. Should you accept the new offer?
0 1 2 3 4
• Find IRR:
0 = 550,000 - 500,000/(1+IRR) – 500,000/(1+IRR)2 – 500,000/(1+IRR)3
+ 1,000,000/(1+IRR)4
→ IRR = 7.16% or 33.67% (trial and error)
• Find IRR:
0 = 550,000 - 500,000/(1+IRR) – 500,000/(1+IRR)2 – 500,000/(1+IRR)3
+ 1,750,000/(1+IRR)4
→ IRR = #NUM (from Excel)
▪ You need to recognize that there are non-conventional cash flows and
look at the NPV profile!
Corp Fin – Paulina Roszkowska 60
IRR Pitfall 4: Mutually Exclusive Projects
▪ When cash flows are not conventional, we may have some IRR
problems: Delayed investment, Multiple IRRs, or Non-existent IRR.
▪ In these situation, do not use the IRR rule, use NPV rule instead.
SCALE PROBLEM:
Would you rather make 100% or 50% on your investments?
What if the 100% return is on a $1 investment, while the 50% return is on a
$1,000 investment?
→ IRR ignores scale!
A project yields 41% IRR and requires a $10 million initial investment. Investors
think that it means that after 5 years, they will have $10M *1.415 = $56M
This is only true if you can reinvest intermediate cash flows at a 41% return.
• McKinsey article: “IRR: A Cautionary Tale."
It is more realistic to assume reinvestment rate equal to the cost of capital.
• To compute the actual return, you can then use Modified IRR (or CAGR).
1
𝐹𝑉 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑛 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑛
𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝐼𝑅𝑅 = −1
𝑃𝑉 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑠ℎ 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙
Excel: =MIRR(CFs,CoC,CoC)
• However, the payback rule does not always give a reliable decision since it
ignores: (i) the time value of money, (ii) cash flows after payback, and (iii) risk.
Example: Project A maximizes NPV but fails to meet a payback rule of 2 years.
The profitability index of a project is the ratio of the present value to the resource
consumed:
𝑁𝑃𝑉
𝑃𝐼 =
𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑
You still want to maximize the NPV of the set of projects you choose.
• Need to consider both NPV and resource constraints requirements.
• You do not necessarily want to pick projects in order of decreasing NPV.
If you incorrectly pick projects in order of decreasing NPV, what's your total
NPV?
If you instead pick projects in order of decreasing PI, what's your total NPV?
Corp Fin – Paulina Roszkowska 68
Best-case cash flows
Given a choice, you should always use NPV! The NPV decision rule:
• Captures how much value the project adds
• Does not require manager to account for shareholder's time preferences
Useful supplements:
• Internal Rate of Return (communication device, less useful for decision-
taking; fixes: incremental & modified IRR)
• Profitability Index (when dealing with resource constraints)
Payback Period (Less useful metric which you should know but not rely
upon)