2nd Group-Language and Cognition
2nd Group-Language and Cognition
Lecturer :
Dr. Sardian Maharani Asnur, S. Pd, M. Pd
Created by:
GROUP 2
GUSNAWATI. N 40300121040
ALDHITA DZAKIYYAH ADNAN 40300121049
WAFIQ AZIZAH 40300121051
PUTRI ANNISA 40300121056
Language and mental representation are two sides of the same coin in the
realm of cognition. While cognition is the engine driving our mental processes,
mental representations are the internal models we build of the world around us.
Language, in turn, acts as a powerful tool for shaping, refining, and expressing
these representations.
The relationship between language and thought has long been taken
seriously in varying academic fields from philosophy to psychology and
anthropology. In the early 18th century, neo-humanism emerged in Germany.
The representatives in the field of linguistics include Johann Gottfried Herder
and Wilhelm Von Humboldt. Herder held that how a nation thinks determines
how its people speak, and how people speak determines how they think.
Humboldt carried forward and developed Herder’s idea and later formed a
systematic linguistic philosophy. Humboldt believed that a language is the
external embodiment of a nation’s spirit; a national language reflects the
national spirit; each language creates a fence around its nation, thus people are
restrained by their mother tongue and its world outlook. In short, Herder and
Humboldt held the same view that language determines thought
Based on Herder’s and Humboldt’s idea, Sapir and his student Benjamin
Lee Whorf raised their viewpoints on the relationship between language and
thought – the famous Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Sapir Whorf hypothesis embodies
linguistic determinism (language determines thought) and linguistic relativity
(there is no limit to the structural diversity of languages). Linguistic determinism
consists of “strong” determinism and “weak” determinism. Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis opened the gates for linguistics and psychologists to further
investigate the relationship between language and thought.
After Sapir and Whorf, many linguists and psychologists also devoted
themselves to the study of the relationship between language and thought. With
their efforts, “strong” determinism and linguistic relativity in Sapir-Whorf
hypothesis have been proven to be indefensible. Many scholars have put forward
proofs to disprove these extreme views in Sapir-Whorl hypothesis; for example,
Eleanor Rosch’s categorization in cognitive linguistics, Georges Mounin’s
translatability in translation, Greenberg’s markedness theory, Herriot’s and
Hockett’s codability, as well as Berlin’s and Kay’s research on people’s memory
and response to focal colors.
Donahoo, S. A., & Lai, V. T. (2020). The mental representation and social aspect of
expressives. Cognition and Emotion, 34(7), 1423-1438.
Issa, S. H., & Awadh, F. H. (2021). Language and cognition: A review study about the
psycholinguistic of bilingualism. Journal of Psychology and Behavior
Studies, 1(1), 17-25.
Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Interactions between language and mental
representations. Language Learning, 66(3), 554-580.
Whorlf BL, 1956, Language, Thought and Reality, The Technology Press of
Massachusettes, Massachusettes.