Employee Performance Appraisal
Employee Performance Appraisal
BY
08/M/KAB/MHRM/161/W
KABALE UNIVERSITY
September, 2011
i
DECLARATION
By:
Rugira Jean Baptiste
Signature____________________________
Date_______________________________
ii
APPROVAL
Signature: ____________________
Date: _______________
iii
DEDICATION
Acknowledgements
This document wouldn’t have been completed without the help of Almighty God and a great
many people. First and foremost, my heartily thanks go to Almighty Father God, for his
graciously provision of knowledge, wisdom, inspiration and diligence required for the successful
completion of this paper and for bringing my dreams into reality. To Kabale University
authorities and lecturers, I am grateful for your providing me the necessary knowledge, support
and opportunity to make the masters degree in Human Resource Management (MHRM) a
reality.
I am also greatly indebted to my supervisor PROFESSOR GEORGE ALIBARUHO for his
countless suggestions, assistance, guidance, encouragement and invaluable advice.
I highly appreciate and thank the staffs of Kigali University Teaching and referral Hospital,
who were cooperative and helpful; especially, workers who participated actively and consciously to
the written questions and interview
To my family, without whom I would be lost, and whose love and unwavering support brought
me comfort and warmth and a place to call home, thank you immensely.
To my friends, my classmates in Masters Program of HRM at Kabale University, especially
Niyonsaba Veronique, Musana Serge, Ndayisaba Egide and Birara Jean Pierre, by association
precious friendship, whose faith in me pushed away self-doubt and made me smile all the times,
thanks a million. To other colleagues, whose touch added shine to the presentation of this
manuscript, God bless you.
Lastly but not the least, my warmest appreciation and thanks go to Ngaboyera Valens , who
supported and encouraged me to succeed in my academic progress and to Nsengiyumva Cleophas
who could always be counted on for his support, courage and motivation
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL.................................................................................................................................... ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. v
LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... vii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... ix
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...................................................................................... x
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................ 1
1.1. Context, Definition, Concepts and Indicators ................................................................... 1
1.1.1. Context ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1.1.1. Critical Criteria of Developing a PAS ........................................................................... 1
1.1.1.2. What to Evaluate? ........................................................................................................... 1
1.1.2 .Definition of key concepts ................................................................................................. 3
1.1.3. Indicators and Appraisal Modalities................................................................................. 4
1.4. Background and importance of the research ...................................................................... 7
1.4.1. Background of the study .................................................................................................... 7
1.5. Problem statement and research questions ........................................................................ 8
1.6. Objectives of the study .......................................................................................................... 9
1.6.1. General objective ................................................................................................................ 9
1.3.2. Specifics objectives ............................................................................................................. 9
1.3.3. Research setting, ............................................................................................................... 10
1.3.4. Characteristics of the research ........................................................................................ 11
1.3.5. Forms of health service delivery ..................................................................................... 11
CHAPTERII: LTERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ................. 13
2.1. PA as tool to enhancing productivity. ............................................................................... 13
2.1.2. Approaches and methods in PA process, ....................................................................... 15
2.1. 3.Why and how do we motivate employees? .................................................................... 19
2.1.3.1. Motivation and Performance ........................................................................................ 19
2.1. 4.Obstacles to put PA into practice ................................................................................... 19
2.1.5. How to overcome appraisal problems? , ........................................................................ 20
CHAPTERIII.RESEARCH METHODOLOGY ...................................................................... 30
3.1. Procedure for data collection ............................................................................................. 30
3.2. Research design .................................................................................................................... 30
3.3. Study population .................................................................................................................. 30
3.3.1. Sampling techniques and Sample Size ............................................................................ 30
3.4. Information sources ............................................................................................................. 31
3.5. Methods of data analysis ..................................................................................................... 32
3.5.1. Descriptive method........................................................................................................... 32
3.5.2. Statistical method ............................................................................................................. 32
3.6. Data processing .................................................................................................................... 32
4.1.1. Demographic Information of the Respondents ............................................................. 33
4.1.2. Distribution by job category or occupation .................................................................. 34
4.1.3.1. Work quality improvement and productivity ............................................................ 36
4.13.1.2. Motivation in the workplace ...................................................................................... 40
Types of ..................................................................................................................................... 41
vi
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1.Matrix of independent PA variables and performance indicators and output/outcomes
................................................................................................................................................................ 22
Table2. 1. Matrix of CHUK before and after the PA indicators relationship to the employees‘
productivity enhancement ............................................................................................................... 26
Table 4.1 .Demographic Information of the Respondents ...................................................... 33
Table4. 2.Distribution of respondents by job category or occupation ................................. 34
Table4. 3. Functions served by the PA ........................................................................................ 35
Table4. 4.Work quality improvement and productivity ......................................................... 37
Table 4.5.Motivation in the workplace ........................................................................................ 41
Table4. 6.Types of decision taken to job knowledge development....................................... 44
Table4. 7.Performance improvement process ............................................................................ 48
Table 4.8.Timeliness achievement ................................................................................................ 49
Table4. 9.Organizational commitment ........................................................................................ 50
Table 4.10.Types of feedback from the PA ................................................................................. 52
Table4. 11.Conflict management and negotiation .................................................................... 55
Table 4.12.Indicators of professional internal customer service ........................................... 56
Table 4.13.Indicators of work behaviour analysis through performance appraisal .......... 57
Table4. 14.Indicators of quality of work and initiative in job performance ....................... 59
Table4. 15.Indicators of job adaptation ....................................................................................... 60
Table4. 16.Indicators of dependability as tool to exchange experiences............................. 63
Table4. 17.Indicators of effective PA ........................................................................................... 64
Table 4.18.Variables influencing the satisfaction of the employees towards the Performance
Appraisal System ............................................................................................................................... 65
Table 4.19.Indicators of related problems of the PA in CHUK............................................. 66
Table4. 20.Performance appraisal problems and possible solutions essays........................ 69
Table4. 21.Objectives of the PA in CHUK ................................................................................. 71
Table4. 22.Related factors to the PA effectiveness ................................................................... 72
Table4. 23.Attributes to evaluate employees ............................................................................. 73
Table 4.24. Personal qualities for evaluating employees......................................................... 74
Table 4.25.Demonstrated qualities of managers toward employees .................................... 76
Table 4.26.Traits, behaviors, and outcomes of the PA in CHUK. ........................................ 78
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure1 .1.Structure of Rwanda health insurance ...................................................... 10
Figure2. 1.Performance typology map, ......................................................................... 23
ix
ABSTRACT
The Performance Appraisal System (PAS) is meant to be mutually beneficial to employees and to the
organization in that it should raise productivity and job satisfaction, among other things. Yet there is
controversy about PAS. This research was conducted with the objective to study how employees
‘performance appraisal practices can enhance productivity in service delivery, taking Kigali University
Teaching and Referral Hospital as a case study. Specifically the study sought to discover how the
performance appraisal process is implemented, including its appraiser- appraise feedback loops; to discuss
factors that can render ineffective appraisal system in our institutions; to suggest measures to help enhance
the success and effectiveness of AS at CHUK and in the Rwandan health sector institutions; and to
propose modalities for extending the results and recommendations of this study to other hospitals outside
Kigali City.
On the basis of data collected through questionnaires which are designed on the basis of a conceptual
framework and assessment of related literature, a methodology was developed to link in the field and
collect data on selected indicators of performance appraisals and their relationship to productivity
measures based on the opinion of the ratees and ratters at CHUK.
On the basis of the data obtained from the respondents and analysis of it, the study identified seven
indicators of PA- productivity such as quality, quantity, job knowledge, timeliness, initiative, adaptability
and dependability. Besides these indicators, the study established the relationship between dependent
(Productivity) and independent (PA rating reference) variables based on thematic analysis of employees
response.
This research report provides the findings of different views of the employees in connection with the
conduct of the PA in the organization. The findings showed that there are many factors related to the
effectiveness of PA implementation, such as traits, behaviors, and outcomes to improve the workers
competences through performance appraisal effectiveness. Other factors are purpose for which performance
appraisal is done, methods for conducting performance appraisal, the process itself, the appropriate rater’s
feedback, setting measurable indicators and performance standards, rewards and pay, and the most
important is the support from the top management. To be successful in designing and implementing the
PA effectively, the strategies to link the objectives of the PA to the culture of the organization, and
motivation to realize the organization’s mission are important. To be effective, the support from the top
management to show their commitment and to translate organizational goals and objectives into
personalized employee specific objectives needs to be ensured.
x
In order for PA information to be useful, the PAS must be able to consistently produce reliable and
valid results. Measurement items in the PAS must be designed in such a way that the results of
rating are consistent regardless of the raters and the timing of the assessment.Another critical
criterion in developing a PAS is the validity of the measurements. It is important to make sure that
the appraisal items are really measuring the intended performance or target behavior. If they are
not, the PAS encourages the wrong kind of work behaviors and produces unintended, frequently
negative, organizational outcomes.
The first important step in developing a PAS is to determine which aspects of performance to
evaluate. The most frequently used appraisal criteria are traits, behaviors, and task outcomes.
1
http://www.enotes.com/buseness-finance-finance-encyclopedia/performance-
appraisal: online on 11/06/2011
2
Traits:
Many employees are assessed according to their traits, such as personality, aptitudes, attitudes,
skills, and abilities. Traits are relatively easy to assess once a rater gets to know ratees. But traits
are not always directly related to job performance. Trait-based assessment can lack objectivity and
thus frequently raises legal questions.
Behaviors:
For many jobs, performance is so broadly defined or so conceptual in nature such as ensuring
public safety in the police department that it is hard to come up with reliable performance
measures. In such cases, desirable behaviors can be identified and assessed in the belief that such
behaviors lead to successful performance. Such behavior-focused assessment encourages employees
to adopt desirable behavioral patterns in the workplace.
Task outcomes:
When information about task outcomes is readily available, it is the most appropriate factor to use
in evaluating performance. When an organization has a clear and measurable goal as in the case of
a sales force, this approach is recommended. However, it has its own pitfalls. There a problem if
employee behaviors are not directly related to the task out-come. Too narrow a focus on measuring
outcomes only sometimes results in unintended negative consequences.
The most common raters of performance are employees' immediate supervisors, who are usually in
the best position to know and observe the employees' job performance. They are also responsible
for employees' work. Their evaluation is a powerful tool in motivating employees to achieve
successful and timely completion of tasks. However, as a result of working together over a long
time with the same employees, the immediate supervisor may build up a fixed impression about
each employee and use it every time he or she has to evaluate performance.
Some companies find that subordinates are in an excellent position to observe and evaluate their
managers' performance, especially when it comes to measuring effective management of their
department. While there is merit in asking subordinates to evaluate how they are managed, such
3
evaluation may turn into a popularity contest. Accurate and objective assessment may not be
obtained if employees are fearful of possible retribution from their supervisors. Anonymity of the
evaluators is key to the successful use of subordinates for objective evaluation.
Other raters who are frequently used in some companies include peers, customers, and the
employees themselves. Peer evaluation is particularly useful when teamwork and collegiality are
important to successful task performance. Peer pressure is sometimes a powerful motivator in
encouraging teamwork among members. Customer satisfaction is vital to a company's success and
can be used in PA. Many companies systematically collect performance information from
customers, typically through anonymous surveys and interviews. Self-assessment is also a useful
means, especially when the PA is intended to identify the training and development needs of
potential employees.
Barton and David (1991) defined performance as‖ the process of defining expectations for employee
performance, measuring, evaluating and recording employee‘s performance related to those
expectations, and providing feed mark to the employee.3
PA has also defined as the result of the application of mental or physical effort performance levels
can be stated in different ways in terms of quantity or quality and may reflect some subjective
judgments by a manager. A particular level of performance may be judged as ―high‖ by one
manager while another at the same level may consider that performance to be ―satisfactory‖ or
―unsatisfactory‖ (Tosi L.H.et.Al.1993).4
Beer (1981) pointed out that a common output of an effective PA process is employees‘ learning
about themselves, employees‘ knowledge about ‗what management values.5 According to Stephan
and Dorfman (1989) outcomes of effective PA are improvement in the accuracy of employee
performance and establishing relationship between performance on tasks and a clear potential for
reward. Dobbins, Cardy and Platzvien (1990) provided five outcomes 6i.e. use of evaluation as
3
Barton P. Miller, Mark D. Callaghan, Jonathan M. Cargille, Jeffrey K. Hollingsworth, R. (1995)Special issue on
performance evaluation tools for parallel and distributed computer systems.
4
Henley L. TOSI, JW. 1972. Make performance appraisal relevant. Harvard Business Review.
5
. Beer, M. (1981). Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities. Organizational
6
Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, S. J. (1990, September). A contingency approach
to appraisal satisfaction
4
1.1.3.1. Indicators8,9,10
7
Steel, R. P., & Mento, A. J. (1986). Impact of situational constraints on
Subjective and objective criteria of managerial job performance.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
8
http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7505E/w7505e06.htm
5
David Hakala (2008) pointed out that performance measurement, which should be an ongoing
activity for all managers and their subordinates, uses the following indicators of performance.
Quantity: the volume of work produced by the employee, along with his or her speed, accuracy and
consistency of output. This variable can be observed as; accomplishes assigned work in an
organized, timely manner; Produces necessary results in spite of unforeseen changes; Alerts
appropriate team member if deadlines need to be re-negotiated to accomplish work with higher
priority.11
The ability to set high standards for own personal performance; strive for quality work; put forth
extra effort to ensure quality work; it can develops and implements new solutions, procedures and
concepts; Demonstrates accuracy, thoroughness, and reliability; shows organization and
completeness; Pays attention to detail; consistently delivers what is required when required.
Initiative: The degree to which the employee independently performs and accomplishes
assignments. This is observed as, requires minimal supervision; sees and acts upon opportunities;
independently contributes ideas and projects promptly undertakes problems and devises solutions;
acts independently within established guidelines.
9
http://www.hr.arizona.edu/05_prf/ratingfactors.php
10
David Hakala (2008), 16Ways to measure employee’s performance
6
Adaptability: Efficiency with which employee works under stress and responds to change. This
produces receptive to change or new ideas‘; shows poise and/or courtesy in tough situations;
demonstrates ability to modify behavioral style and approach to goal.
Timeliness: How fast work is performed is another performance indicator that should be used
with caution. In field service, the average customer‘s downtime is a good indicator of timeliness. In
manufacturing, it might be the number of units produced per hour.
Performance indicators must be assessed by some means in order to measure performance
itself.11111111
1.1.3.2. Modalities12
13
David Hakala (2008), 16Ways to measure employee’s performance
7
Team Appraisal: Similar to ―peer appraisal‖ in that members of a team, who may hold different
positions, are asked to appraise each other‘s work and work styles. This approach assumes that the
team‘s objectives and each member‘s expected contribution have been clearly defined.
.
Assessment Services Center: a center is located outside the organization. The employee is
appraised by professional assessors who may evaluate stimulated or actual work activities.
Objectivity is one advantage of assessment centers, which produce reviews that are not clouded by
personal relationships with employees.
360-Degree or “Full-Circle” Appraisal: The employee‘s performance is appraised by everyone
with whom he or she interacts, including managers, peers, customers and members of other
departments. This is the most comprehensive and expensive way to measure performance and it is
generally reserved for key employees.14
14
http://www.hr.arizona.edu/05_prf/ratingfactors.php
15
http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=context+historical+background+of+health+system+in+rwanda&oq=context+histo
rical+background+of+health+system+in+rwanda
8
health area, the proportion of women who had at least the recommended four prenatal
consultations is only 10 per cent; the attendance rate for assisted deliveries has improved 14 per
cent in 1997 to 31 per cent in 2000; but too few pregnancies are ultimately referred to hospitals
where adequate care can be provided.
1.4.2. Importance of the research in Rwanda
Today Rwanda has a vision to develop different sectors based on competition at workplace, as key
to achieve said‖2o2o vision‖ in this case our attention is attracted by medical institutions where
appraisal system is clearly practiced. Kigali city hospitals were chosen because there is a large
population and data source. We have to observe to both the AS and its outcomes. Therefore we will
be able to conclude the role of PA on the employees‘ motivation so far to increase productivity of
an organization.16
The present research is motivated by the need of helping managers and employees of health care
institutions to increase the AS effectiveness.
It will help also other researchers related to the same field and it will also help students who
complete their studies in Department of Human Resource Management be able to present their
research projects in order to finish their studies.
It is known that the PA is a vital component of the process of managing human resources with the
aim of achieving system employee and organizational goal.
1.5. Problem statement and research questions
The real problems in PA system at Kigali City referral hospital are linked to the following aspects:
little agreement on what aspects of performance to measure the unrealistic expectation that
measures be objective and quantifiable standards that ignore personal characteristics and individual
behaviors that determine success; and the failure to use the results of appraisal as a basis for
training, compensation and promotion.
It has been agreed that an effectively designed, implemented, and administered PAS can provide
the organization, the manager, and the employee a myriad of benefits. But many organizations fail
to establish an AS that is valid and reliable. The problem comes perhaps from different parameters:
what are the appraisal objectives of the organization? It may be the appraisal purpose, appraisal
basis, factors that should be considered. Therefore, the reasons are so much; they include
employees‘ fear of being evaluated, manager‘s fear of the role of the judge, poor performance
measures, inadequate communication skills, few rewards for high ratings, and no accountability for
16
http://www.usaid.gov/rw/our_work/for_partners/images/rwandahealthsectorstrategicplanii.pdf
9
Both managers and employees are faced such problems about implementation and maintenance
appraisal system. May be private or public institutions, employees‘ acceptance of an organization‘
PAS is perceived to be critical factor in appraisal effectiveness. Employees accuse appraisal system
(AP) subjectivity, and unacceptable. Some of them are frequently met during interview on both
interviewee and interviewer there is a case of hello effect, legacy error, personal bias, strictness
leniency error, insufficient evidence, and central tendency error…
In light of the above problem statement and research objectives (etc …), the researcher accordingly
seeks to find answers to the following related research questions:
-How can PA in Kigali city Hospitals be made a key instrument for develop employee motivation
and enhancing productivity?
-In light of common problems known to have been encountered by managers and employees
regarding PA in Kigali City, how can the design and process aspects of the AS be enhanced to
improve implementation and effectiveness in Kigali City Hospitals?
1.6. Objectives of the study
1.6.1. General objective
A considerable number of employees often view the PAS as one in which managers simply
complete the form, after considerable prodding, and forward them to the personnel department to
be filed.
The general objective of the study is to research, discuss and help design effective PA and
productivity enhancement tools in Rwandan institutions, focusing on Kigali City referral Hospitals.
17
http://www.chk.org.rw/
18
http://rwanda.usembassy.gov/medical_information.html
19
http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=Structure+of+Rwanda+health+insurance&btnG=Google+Search
&oq=Structure
11
The researcher designed a survey questionnaire for managers and operatives CHUK referral
hospital located in Kigali city. However, in data collection, only purposeful statements based upon
research objective and research questions have been included.
Closed questions, opened questions and semi-closed questions have been used to respondent to
elicit from them diversified sources of information. Medium of communication were English with
focus on use of conventional language.
Wording of survey questions/statements has been kept simple and unbiased and questions of
trivial nature have been avoided. Instructions/legends were also given at the start of every set of
questions having same format
For expeditious response, survey questionnaires have been be administered through referrals.
Nominal scales have also been used for few personal information questions.
The researchers focused mainly on descriptive statistic to describe facts that has been found in
data, tools of descriptive statistics were also used.
Data has been prepared for application of statistical treatments for further descriptive and
confirmatory analysis.
20
http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=context+historical+background+of+health+system+in+rwanda&o
q=context+historical+background+of+health+system+in+rwanda
12
Characteristics of health care include continuity, integration, social awareness, and relevance of
health care. Characteristics of services include decentralization, continuous provision, flexibility,
and efficiency of health services.
Historical Background.
Rwanda‘s health sector has undergone a fundamental transition in the last century: in the time
before colonial era, health care consisted of traditional African healing methods. The German and
later Belgian colonial period saw the emergence of faith-based health care and with it the
introduction of modern treatment methods.
th
In the second half of the 20 century, before the war and genocide, Rwanda‘s health system was
characterised by a high degree of centralisation and free provision of services. Most of the
country‘s infrastructure was destroyed in the tragic events. The first years following the war were
spent with rebuilding basic health care and human resources; now the health system is ready for
the next phase of its development.
Mission statement.
The global vision of the Government of Rwanda set out in Vision 2020 is to guarantee the well
being of the population by increasing production and reducing poverty within an environment of
good governance. As part of this vision, the Government seeks to overcome the illnesses linked
with poverty and ignorance, and to develop a proactive and well performing health system capable
of anticipating and appropriately responding to the health needs of the population. Within this
context, the mission of the Ministry of Health is to ensure and promote the health status of the
population of Rwanda.
13
21
http://www.jstor.org/pss/3379942
22
http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/performance-appraisal-procedure/
23
. Craig, S. E., Beatty, R. W., & Baird, L. S. (1986),Creating a performance management system.
Training and Development Journal,
14
The first step is to identify and establish measures, which would differentiate between successful
and unsuccessful performances. These measures should be under the control of the employees
being appraised. The methods for assessing performance should be decided next. Basically,
management wants to know the behavior and personal characteristics of each employee; and assess
their performance and achievement in the job. There are various methods available for assessing
results, behavior and personal characteristics of an employee. These methods can be used according
to the particular circumstances and requirements.
The second step in the appraisal process is communicating to employees the measures and
standards which will be used in the appraisal process. Such communication should clarify
expectations and create a feeling of involvement.
Planning
In this stage, the manager plans for the realization of performance expectations, arranging for the
resources to be available which are required for attaining the goals set. This is an enabling role.
Monitoring performance
Appraising
This stage involves documenting performance through observing, recalling, evaluating, written
communication, judgment and analysis of data. This is like putting together an appraisal record.
Feedback
After the formal appraisal stage, a feedback session is desirable. This session should involve verbal
15
Decision making
On the basis of appraisal and feedback results, various decisions can be made about giving rewards
(e.g., promotion, incentives, etc.) and punishments (e.g., demotion). The outcome of an AS should
also be used for career development.
Development of performance
PA is a multistage process involving several activities, which can be administered using a variety of
approaches. Some of these approaches are considered below, based on Einstein and LeMere-
Labonte, 1989; and Monga, 1983:
Approaches of PA
In this technique, management establishes the goals openly and sets targets against realistic output
standards. These standards are incorporated into the organizational PAS. Thus each employee has
a clear understanding of their duties and knows well what is expected of them.
Intuitive approach In this approach, a supervisor or manager judges the employee based
on their perception of the employee's behavior.
Self-appraisal approach: Employees evaluate their own performance using a common
24
. Monga, M. L. 1983. Management of Performance Appraisal. Bombay: Himalaya Publishing House.
25
http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7505E/w7505e06.htm
16
format.
Group approach: the employee is evaluated by a group of persons.
Trait approach: This is the conventional approach. The manager or supervisor evaluates
the employee on the basis of observable dimensions of personality, such as integrity, honesty,
dependability, punctuality, etc.
Appraisal based on achieved results: in this type of approach, appraisal is based on
concrete, measurable, work achievements judged against fixed targets or goals set mutually by the
subject and the assessor.
Methods of PA26,27,28,29
Behavioral method: This method focuses on observed behavior and observable critical
incidents.
As far as techniques in PA are concerned, there are several techniques of PA, each with some
strong points as well as limitations. Oberg (1972) has summarized some of the commonly used PA
techniques.
The assessor writes a brief essay providing an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses and
potential of the subject. In order to do so objectively, it is necessary that the assessor knows the
subject well and should have interacted with them. Since the length and contents of the essay vary
between assessors, essay ratings are difficult to compare.
A graphic scale 'assesses a person on the quality of his or her work (average; above average;
outstanding; or unsatisfactory).' Assessment could also be trait centered and cover observable
26
http://www.openlearningworld.com/olw/courses/books/Performance%20and%20Potential%20Appraisal/PerformanceA
ppraisal.html
27
http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/performance-appraisal-methods/
28
http://appraisals.naukrihub.com/modern-method.html
29
http://www.explorehr.org/articles/Performance_Appraisal/Performance_Appraisal_Methods.html
17
traits, such as reliability, adaptability, communication skills, etc. Although graphic scales seem
simplistic in construction, they have application in a wide variety of job responsibilities and are
more consistent and reliable in comparison with essay appraisal.
Since individual assessors differ in their standards, they inadvertently introduce bias in their
rating. To overcome this assessor-related bias, essay and graphic rating techniques can be
combined in a systematic review process. In the field review method, 'a member of the HRM staff
meets a small group of assessors from the supervisory units to discuss each rating, systematically
identifying areas of inter-assessor disagreement.
Unlike the field review method, the forced-choice rating method does not involve discussion with
supervisors. Although this technique has several variations, the most common method is to force
the assessor to choose the best and worst fit statements from a group of statements. These
statements are weighted or scored in advance to assess the employee. The scores or weights
assigned to the individual statements are not revealed to the assessor so that she or he cannot favor
any individual. In this way, the assessor bias is largely eliminated and comparable standards of
performance evolved for an objective.
In this method, a supervisor describes critical incidents, giving details of both positive and negative
behavior of the employee. These are then discussed with the employee. The discussion focuses on
actual behavior rather than on traits. While this technique is well suited for performance review
interviews, it has the drawback that the supervisor has to note down the critical incidents as and
when they occur.
Management by objectives
The employees are asked to set or help set their own performance goals. This avoids the feeling
among employees that they are being judged by unfairly high standards. This method is currently
widely used, but not always in its true spirit. Even though the employees are consulted, in many
cases management ends up by imposing its standards and objectives. In some cases employees may
18
not like 'self-direction or authority.' To avoid such problems, the work standard approach is used.
Ranking methods
Some of the important forms of ranking for PA are given below, based on Oberg, 1972; and
Monga, 1983: 30
Alteration ranking method:
The individual with the best performance is chosen as the ideal employee. Other employees are
then ranked against this employee in descending order of comparative performance on a scale of
best to worst performance. The alteration ranking method usually involves rating by more than
one assessor. The ranks assigned by each assessor are then averaged and a relative ranking of each
member in the group is determined.
Paired comparison:
The paired comparison method systematizes ranking and enables better comparison among
individuals to be rated. Every individual in the group is compared with all others in the group. The
evaluations received by each person in the group are counted and turned into percentage scores.
The scores provide a fair idea as to how each individual in the group is judged by the assessor.
Person-to-person rating:
In the person-to-person rating scales, the names of the actual individuals known to all the assessors
are used as a series of standards. These standards may be defined as lowest, low, middle, high and
highest performers. Individual employees in the group are then compared with the individuals used
as the standards, and rated for a standard where they match the best.
Checklist method:
The assessor is furnished with a checklist of pre-scaled descriptions of behavior, which are then
used to evaluate the personnel being rated (Monga, 1983). The scale values of the behavior items
are unknown to the assessor, who has to check as many items as she or he believes describe the
worker being assessed. A final rating is obtained by averaging the scale values of the items that
have been marked.
30
Oberg (19670), Implementation and Evaluation. Bureau of Industrial Relations, University of Michigan
19
Motivation is the combination of a person's desire and energy directed at achieving a goal. It is the
cause of action. Influencing people's motivation means getting then to want to do what you know
must be done (Military Leadership, 1993).
Motivation can be intrinsic, such as satisfaction and feelings of achievement; or extrinsic, such as
rewards, punishment, and goal obtainment. Not all people are motivated by the same thing and
over time their motivations might changes.32
Motivational Issues
Often an employee knows how to perform correctly, the process is good, and all resources are
available, but for one reason or another, chooses not to do so, which normally means it is a
motivational issue. While many jobs have problems that are inherent to the position, it is the
problems that are inherent to the person that normally cause us to lose focus from our main task of
getting results. These motivational problems could arrive from family pressures, personality
conflicts, a lack of understanding on how the behavior affects other people or process, etc. 33
31
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation
32
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation
20
The hallo effect: This is the influence of rater‘s general impression on rating of specific
rated qualities. In the practice, it means that your rating of a subordinate on one major trait
biases how you rate that person on other traits.
Central tendency: Many supervisors have central tendency when filling in rating scales.
For example, if the rating scale ranges from1 to 7,they tend to avoid highs of (6 and 7) and (1
and 2) and rate most of their people between 3 and 5.If you use a graphic rating scale, this
central tendency could mean that all employees are simply rated ―average‖, this distorts
evaluation.
Leniency or strictness: Some supervisors tend to rate all their subordinates consistently
high or low, just as some instructors are notoriously high graders while others are not.
2.1.5. How to overcome appraisal problems? 35,
There are four ways to minimize the impact of appraisal problems such as bias and central
tendency (Arthur P.Brief 2000). First, be sure to understand problems as just discussed and the
suggestions like clarifying standards given for each of them.
Second, chose the right appraisal tool. Each tool, such as graphic rating scale or critical incident
method, has its own advantages. For example, the ranking method avoid central tendency but can
cause ill feelings when employee‘s performances are in fact all high.
Third, train supervisors to eliminate rating errors such as hallo and leniency. In a typical training
program, program, raters are shown a videotape jobs being performed and are asked to rate the
worker. Ratings made by each participant are then placed on a flipchart, and the various errors
such as leniency and halo are explained. The trainer gives the correct rating and then illustrates
the rating errors the participants made.36
2.2. Integrating the Conceptual framework
A large number of companies use formal PA to measure, recognize and reward employee
performance. How frequently an appraisal is administered has little influence over whether desired
outcomes in employee performance and behavior are achieved. The key to a successful PA is clear
communication, accurate information and flawless execution. Table1is a matrix illustrating the
relationship between independent variable ―PA‖ system components and dependent ―productivity‘‘
variables. In the same vein, Fig 2 shows these relationships.
36
http://www.qurtuba.edu.pk/jms/default_files/JMS/1_2/7_ayaz.pdf
21
The successful managerial system within an organization is a combination of the three levels of
performance needs and nine performance variables which builds performance typology map
(Figure2).
The three performance needs that must be met at each of the three levels are:
Goals , specific standards or expectations that customers have for products or services
Design ,configurations that enables goals to be met efficiently
Management , practices that ensure goals are up to date and are achieved
Combining the three levels of organizations with the three performances needs results in
nine performance variables (see the above matrix). Failure to manage these nine
performance variables will lead to a failure to manage the business holistically. Thus, every
performance improvement effort must be viewed through t his matrix.
The majority of managers simply do not understand the variables that influence organization and
individual performance. They are not aware of the 'performance levers' that they should be pulling
and encouraging others to pull.
37
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/motivation.html
38
http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/performance/performance_typology.html
24
From these matrixes, CHUK is committed to provide quality health care state according to the
value statement such as:
o Accountability
o Integrity
o Professionalism
o And excellence.
This will be achieved with competent and motivated staff, and in collaboration with all
stakeholders within available resources.
2.2.3. Analysis model of real PA indicators observed in CHUK
The PA indicators of CHUK will be observed through a set of questionnaire which is organized in
the annex of this work.
25
26
Table2.2. Matrix of CHUK before and after the PA indicators relationship to the employees‟
productivity enhancement
Effect 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100
4.Jobknow Creativity Forecast Strong work Profession Develo Devel Gain Performanc 1
ledge and job and ethic al ping oped social e
performance discount knowledge talent comp skills improveme
training etenc nt
needs es
Effect 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 85.7
5.Adaptabi Ability to Adapt Patience Maturity Tenaci Com Exchan Increased 1
lity modify work habit and problem ty mitm ge confidence
behavioural solving ent experie and
style nces knowledge
and to resolve
positiv problems
e
attitud
es
Effect 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 5 71.4
27
Effect 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6 85.7
7.Timeline Forecasting Punctualit Cases are Develop Attend maint Cases Time 1
ss y usually the ance ainin are managemen
completed individual g usually t
correctly and plan assig comple
and for future ned ted
in a timely performan work correctl
fashion. ce sched y and
ules in a
timely
fashion.
Total and 87.4%
%
CHUK Far exceeds Exceeds Meets Job Needs Need No Routine
before PA job job Requirement Needs some s strong productitiv
plan requirement requireme Some improv some commit ity
nt Improvem ement impro ment
ent veme
nt
Effect 0 0 0
1.Quality Actions Expected
limited on productivit
expectations y
not on
standards
Effect 1 1 100
2.Quantity Produced Producing
unity assigned
limited on unity
routine
Effect 1 1 100
3.Initiative Depended Subordinat
on only es
instructions conformity
or loyalty on
and the regulations
supervisor is and
routinely managers
satisfied are
routinely
satisfied
Effect 1 1 100
28
services. In each stratum (department), we took an equal proportion (25%) of workers; the
total of proportion calculated from stratum gave us the sample of the population. In next, in
CHUK there are 707 workers distributed in different department.
library; consult many books related to the subject of the research to get literature review.
Technique of Questionnaire
Questionnaire to our research as defined as data gathering technique ,it helped to gather
attitude, beliefs, behaviors, and Characteristics from several key people in the institutions
chosen to get the study population.
Observation technique
Researcher used personal observation; personal observation is explained as an indispensable
part of the study of any social observation institutions; Observation is the primary technique
of data collection on non-verbal behaviors.
This technique helped us to make the behavioral study of respondents whereby it became the
part of them by participating in their daily activities which helped us to acquire more
information from the population of study.
3.5. Methods of data analysis
A method is defined as group of organized principles, rules and intellectual operations that
helps to make analysis in order to achieve results.
For this study to be done in clarity and conciseness, different methods have been used.
3.5.1. Descriptive method
This method helped in carrying out this study, we described people, situations, and events,
Information that has been obtained helped in decision making and problem solving to our
problem statement.
3.5.2. Statistical method
This method gave us the means of exploiting the statistical data. It has been used for
presentation of results in form of tables in order to help the synthetic work that facilitated the
analysis of data and it helped us to quantity the results of the research.
3.5.3. Analytical method
This is a continuation of descriptive method where we have gone beyond merely describing
the characteristics, to analyzing and explaining why or how it is happening. Thus, it will
facilitate to understand phenomena by discovering causal relations among them.
3.6. Data processing
In order to be presented in a more comprehensive form, data collection is not an end itself,
unless data is processed, analyzed and converted into information in format that can be
helpful to the user
33
In the next, the researcher tried appropriate obtained results to look at their possible
applicability to the whole country PA situation in service delivery. These have been done
from a statistical and methodological point of view.
Store 4 1 100
Sterilization 9 1 50
Archives 3 1 100
Neuron –synergic 13 3 100
Operation room 40 9 90
Synergic 43 9 81.8
Clinic 11 2 100
Dermatology 6 1 50
Polyclinic 11 1 33.3
Emergency 57 13 92.8
Overall respondents: 707 162
Functions
145 17
Quality 89.5% 10.5%
139 23
Quantity
85.6% 14.2%
133 29
Initiative
82.1% 17.1%
Timeliness 129 33
79.6% 20.4%
Job knowledge 131 31
80.9% 19.1%
Adaptability 126 36
77.8% 22.2%
123 39
Dependability
75.9% 24.1%
Mean 81.6% 18.4%
39
http://www.uchastings.edu/hr/docs/performance-appraisal.pdf
36
With respect to the work quality, the data from the survey shown in the table below can lead
one to declare that work quality is typical for the health sectors within CHUK under study,
regardless their respective quality improvement.
40
Andrey Kiselev (2007) the Effect of Performance Appraisal on Productivity and
Employees
41
http://www.evasinitiatives.com/EVAsToolKit/CHP-12/chapt_12-1_4.htm
37
At this point, the question was to know any types of improvement quality provided by the PA
in the healthcare institutions; results from this survey indicate that there are several types of
improvement quality such as;
Motivation: This was strongly agreed on 72% and 23.8 % agreed with respondents .For
them; it indicates the degree to which the employee pursues goals with commitment and takes
pride in accomplishment. In term of assertiveness, it strives to employees the quality of taking
initiative eagerly; demonstrating orientation to achieve results, behavioral reflects a desire to
excel on the job, working steadily and actively, demonstrating self-confidence and positive
38
attitude towards self and others. In the next, only 2.4 %disagreed about this point, the same
1.8 was strongly disagreed.
Timeliness: 58.9% of respondents strongly agreed and 38.1% agreed on this. It addresses
how quickly, when or by what date the work unit is expected to produce the
work.Nevertheless, 2.4%ofrespondents disagreed and 0.6% strongly disagreed. Those who
don‘t understand yet how well timeliness can help them consistently to meet expectations of
attendance,
Punctuality, use of sick leave and rest periods are wrong. Without, time management within
an organization, employee are faced such case of time mismanagement toward organizational
goals to be achieved in an amount of time.
Expected product: This was strongly mentioned by 66.1%of respondent and 24.4% was
agreed with it. Service quality, which always involves the customer as part of a transaction, is
therefore always a balance: the balance between the expectations that the customer had and
their perceptions of the service received. A 'high quality' service is one where the customer's
perceptions meet or exceed their expectations.
Expectations are measured in term of Reliability known as the ability to provide a service as
expected by the customer; assurance which implies the degree to which the customer can feel
confident that the service will be correctly provided; tangibles which indicate the quality of
the physical environment and materials used in providing the service.; responsiveness which
is the ability of the service provider to respond to the individual needs of a particular
customer; empathy is the courtesy, understanding and friendliness shown by the service
provider etc.
This was strongly agreed with respondents on 55.4% of respondent and agreed on
36.9%.For them; OC refers to some form of attachment and loyalty to the organization. It is
contended that the OC of managers and other employees is essential for survival and
effectiveness of large work of an organization because the fundamental responsibility of
management is to maintain the organization in state of health necessary to carry on its work.
39
Planning: 66.6% of interviewees were strongly agreed and 28.6 %was agreed the extent, to
which the employee plans, organizes and implements tasks or programs. Therefore, they are
lucked to demonstrate effective use of time and facilities subject to their control; to meet
deadlines; to maintain a clear grasp of daily tasks; prioritize duties in a manner consistent
with organizational objective; effectively to manage tasks or program assignments including
follow-through and delegation etc.
Work habits: Consider whether the employee's overall work style is effective and productive
in terms of time management, setting objectives and priorities, adhering to standards and
guidelines, and following up on commitments across a variety of work challenges.42
Work habits are a very large part of the overall performance of every employee. It is the
workplace behavior, the very ways we do things, from the time arrive at work until we leave,
that demonstrates our level of professionalism, and our understanding of our employer‘s
standards of performance.‖ These things, coupled with our ability to complete tasks correctly
and on time, is what increases our value as an employee. These was confirmed by 64.9% of
respondents who strongly agreed on it and 23.8% agreed .Both accepted the universal
standards of good work habits on the following the checklist below:
42
http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla
40
of assistance asking probing questions that elicit the facts and help the customer
through some of the decision-making process; uses customer contacts as opportunities
for education to increase customer independence; advises in a manner consistent with
the complexity and nature of the customer's need; etc.
Accuracy: Accurate ratings reflect the employees' actual job performance levels. Employment
decisions that are based on inaccurate ratings are not valid and would thus be difficult to
justify if legally challenged. Fortunately, accurate ratings seem to be rare. Inaccuracy is most
often attributable to the presence of rater errors, such as leniency, severity, central tendency,
halo, and regency errors.58.3% of respondents confirmed accuracy to be respected during PA
process and 25% of respondent agreed as confirming the same.
The rating errors occur because of problems with human judgment. Typically, raters do not
consciously choose to make these errors, and they may not even recognize when they do make
them.
Ability to meet standards: Standards describe the conditions that must exist before the
performance can be rated satisfactory. Research findings revealed that,57.1% strongly agreed
the fact that they meet standards or consistently meets all job standards and exceed
performance expectations or objectives;28% also agreed the fact that performance appraisal
helps them to exceed all of performance expectations or objectives. Therefore they
demonstrates excellent ability to coordinate work and set priorities, with very willing to
cooperate with others; inspires positive work relations, and work is of exceptionally high
quality; virtually error free.
Role of initiative and behavior in job performance: Taking initiative doesn't always mean
taking on a task before being asked; it can also be changing the procedure of an everyday task
we do to make it more efficient.
It implies the degree to which the employee independently performs and accomplishes
assignments. This requires minimal supervision, sees and acts upon opportunities,
independently contributes ideas and projects promptly undertakes problems and devises
solutions, acts independently within established guidelines…
It most commonly refers to whether persons perform their job well. Despite the confusion
over how it should be exactly defined, performance is an extremely important criterion that
relates to organizational outcomes and success does. According to behavior based on job
performance, 87.7% of interviews, are designed to enable interviewers to gather information
about how well they previously performed tasks, solved problems and used competencies that
are similar to tasks and problems they encounter and competencies they will need mastery of
in order to perform well in the job for which they had been interviewed; while12.3% disagreed
the effectiveness of the PA as results of motivation. Preferred behavior to them is observed on
how they take initiative as for example:
-To look around to see what needs to be done and do it, or to wait for duties to be assigned to
them,
-To ask questions to try to learn more, or stick to what they already know and have been told
to them…etc.
42
Strong Work Ethic: Employers value employees who understand and possess a willingness
to work hard. In addition to working hard it is also important to work smart. This means
learning the most efficient way to complete tasks and finding ways to save time while
completing daily assignments. This was observed up this research where 88.3% of
respondents agreed that they work actively and steadily as their dearly orientation to achieve
results while only 11.7% doesn‘t
This is very important to care about their job and complete all projects while maintaining a
positive attitude. Doing more than is expected on the job is a good way to show management
that they utilize good time management skills and don‘t waste valuable company time
attending to personal issues not related to the job.
Employee Attitude: The attitude of the employee affects job performance. When employees
arrive at work, they bring with them their moods, their emotions, their opinions and their
problems at home or with life in general. Since employees may have the need to cooperate
with each other to get the work done, their attitude will have great influence on productivity,
their relationships with each other and productivity on the job. In the next, results of the
research shows that 86% of respondents have positive attitude and are self-confident while
16% of respondent are not. However, Working with someone who has a negative attitude
can make work life very unpleasant. The focus can become the negative employee rather than
doing a good job for the company. Employees may dread coming to work if there is someone
negative in their department or on their team. There may be more absences and employees
who are normally in a good mood may become negative as well. Conflict may arise as a result
of a negative attitude which may cause disruption and lack of teamwork in the company.
Many organizations face the challenge of developing greater confidence, initiative, solutions-
finding, and problem-solving capabilities among their people. Organizations need staff at all
levels to be more self-sufficient, resourceful, creative and autonomous. This behavior enables
staff can operate at higher strategic level, which makes their organizations more productive
and competitive.
44
140 22
Planning and organizing
86.4% 13.6%
82.1% 17.9%
Performance appraisals are supposed to evaluate the performance of a worker, reward good
performance with promotions and pay raises and set goals to help employees continue to
improve. According to research, 86.4% of respondents agreed the extent, to which the
employee plans, organizes and implements tasks or programs t in order to get decisions such
as hiring, transfer, promotion, job analysis, terminations, etc , While 13.6% of respondents
disagreed. These are demonstrated on how long they demonstrate effective use of time and
facilities subject to their control, meet deadlines, maintains clear grasp of daily tasks,
prioritizes duties in a manner consistent with organizational objectives, and effectively
manages tasks or program assignments including follow-through and delegation. In the next,
82.7%of respondent agreed the complementarities between training, coaching, mentoring,
capacity building and creativity in spite of 17.3% disagreed.
Coaching brings to them more humanity into the workplace. Effective coaching in the
CHUK delivers achievement, fulfillment and joy from which both the individual and
organization benefit. Effective coaching delivers achievement, which is sustainable.
45
Achievement means "the delivery extraordinary results, organizational and goals achieved,
strategies, project and plans executed. It suggests effectiveness, creativity, and innovation.
Coaching and mentoring are popular capacity-building tools, especially in the leadership
development of CHUK. They are mentioned in this research and reviewed as key elements of
good capacity-building practice.
Training also helps them significantly in identifying the training needs. Performance
appraisal helps to reveal their differences and discrepancies in the desired and the actual
performance. The causes of the discrepancies are also found whether they are due to the lack
of adequate training or not.
Training people, especially graduates, young rising stars and new recruits, is commonly
linked to the veiled promise of or allusion to management opportunity. But what happens
when the organization is unable to offer a management promotion at the end of the training
program? This is a familiar pattern and challenge in many organizations. How can we
encourage workers of CHUK into a management development programs, with no assurance of
a promotion into management at the end of it?
The degree of difficulty in measuring training time per person depends on what we define as
training; training time per person on training courses is relatively easy to measure, but on-
the-job coaching, informal mentoring, personal reading and learning - these are less
quantifiable - we'd normally need to get this data from these employees via a survey or other
special report.
It is possible to manage 'training time per person' aims and data via annual appraisals, when
training past and future could be quantified - this could be a relatively simple add-on to
whatever appraisal system you are using currently, and could relatively easily be cascaded via
managers.
Creativity can explains to them the extent to which their generates workable and innovative
ideas, concepts and techniques.
The concept of capacity building, Capacity building efforts can include to them a broad
range of approaches, e.g., granting operating funds, granting management development
46
Both counseling and feedback is to provide your staff with the information, advice and
assistance they need to contribute fully to the achievement of your organization‘s objectives
and, where a person fails to make the required contribution, to demonstrate that you have
made an appropriate effort to assist them.
43
http://hr.osu.edu/policy/resources/perfimproveguide.pdf
48
The PIP may include a number of steps designed to alert the employee to performance or
other deficiencies and encourage improvements in performance. These steps are: verbal
communication, written communication, hearing, and feedback, and negotiation, empathy,
reaching and reaching agreement. These were agreed by 79.6% of respondents while 20.4% of
respondents disagreed.
Verbal communication indicates to the employee specific areas requiring improvement and
describes what must be done to meet performance expectations. Employees must be told that
their jobs ―may be in jeopardy‖ and, when applicable and that failure to make the necessary
improvements may lead to termination. Respondents‘ agreement is the same up to written
communication.44
A written warning or a more detailed performance improvement plan usually outlines
specific problems, describes what must be done to meet performance expectations, tells
employees how and when they will be given feedback on performance, outlines assistance and
support to be given and gives a time frame within which the deficiencies must be corrected.45
The productivity of negotiation of PA faced the population of this study, we have found that
the majority of interviewees I mean 61.7% out of 38.8% disagreed the fact that it contributes
44
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/employee-appraisal-phrases-communication-
skills.html
45
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/employee-appraisal-phrases-communication-
skills.html
49
in achieving organizational goals. The negotiation to be more effective, they must know
however and how why they negotiate and what to achieve through the negotiation, what their
main issues, interest, and limitation.
Table4.8.Timeliness achievement
Management system, have daily, weekly, and monthly reports that must be run in timely and
accurate manner, and they are given tasks, which must be met on time. They work with
multiple data sets to ensure complete and accurate data in a given period .These was
46
http//www.doi.gov/hrm/guidance/370dm430hndbk.pdf
50
confirmed by 77.7% of respondents out of 22.2% disagreed, on how long forecasting helps
them Time management, respecting timetable and achieve adaptability in stress tolerance.
In one side, CHUK study as many as 58.6% of workers described their jobs as very stressful.
While not a scientific gauge and not measuring serious stress health problems, this gives
some indication as to how prevalent work-related stress is. The other side we have only 41.4%
of respondents which are not most affected by work-related stress.
An employer provides a stress-reduction work environment, recognize where stress is
becoming a problem for staff, and take action to reduce stress. Stress in the workplace reduces
productivity, increases management pressures, and makes people ill in many ways evidence of
which is still increasing. Workplace stress affects the performance of the brain, including
functions of work performance; memory, concentration, and learning. Stress at work also
provides a serious risk of litigation for all employers and organizations, carrying significant
liabilities for damages, bad publicity and loss of reputation.
47
http://www.sharjah.ac.ae/Arabic/About_UOS/UOSPublications/Appliedsciences/Issues/Doc
uments/2_3/6.pdf
51
Continuance 98 64
Commitment
60.5% 39.5%
Affective commitment is defined as employee emotional attachment to, identification with,
and involvement in the organization and its goals while normative commitment is induced
by a feeling of obligation to remain with an organization.75.3% of respondents are involved in
the job while 24.7% are not. It means that employees identifies strongly and shares goals and
objectives of the organization. It means also that they stay in the organization in conformance
of the other social pressure.
Continuance commitment is defined as willingness to remain in an organization because of
personal investment in the form of nontransferable investments such as close working
relationships with coworkers, retirement investments and career investments, acquired job
skills which are unique to a particular organization, years of employment in a particular
organization, involvement in the community in which the employer is located, and other
benefits that make it too costly for one to leave and seek employment elsewhere. This is a
practical case confirmed by 60.5% out of 39.5% of respondents disagreed the fact that CC
denotes that the individuals stays with the organization and is convinced that he/she cannot
afford to leave since it would be costly to do so. Meyer and Allen (1991) viewed that same as,
it is contended that the OC of managers and other employees is essential for the survival and
effectiveness of large work organizations because the fundamental responsibility of
management is to maintain the organization in the state of health necessary to carry on its
work. Effective management thus presupposes a proprietary concern, a sense of responsibility
for and dedication to sustaining the well-being of the organization.CC may be as results of
length of work experience and the associated financial benefits like terminal pay, gratuity or
pension accruals, which the employee may lose if He/ She were to leave. It is equally possible
that another job position may be lower in status or available in an organization with a lower
standing.48
48
Meyer, John P., Allen, Natalie J. & Smith, Catherine A. 1993. Commitment to
organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component
conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology,
52
results to those people. It is a powerful tool and, if used well, it will lead to improved
performance for both individuals and the organisation.
Table.4.10.Types of feedback from the PA
The ability to use time effectively is key to being able to accomplish goals in a reasonable
period of time. It is important for employees to be able to manage time effectively and to
continually improve upon the techniques that are used in order to better their overall work
performance. Tasks involving time management can include being on time when arriving or
coming back from breaks, meeting deadlines, managing a schedule, estimating a project
outcome, or balancing the time needs of work with private life. According to interview, 71.2%
of them agreed the fact that time management review help them to achieve effective us of time
and meet deadlines; whereas 22.8 of them prove the difference. Managing employee
performance every day is the key to an effective performance management system. Setting
goals, making sure your expectations are clear, and providing frequent feedback help people
perform most effectively.
Measure SWOT analysis: It is a strategic planning method used to evaluate the strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities, and threats involved in an organization. It involves specifying the
49
http //www.businessballs.com/traindev.htm
53
objective of the business venture or project and identifying the internal and external factors
that are favorable and unfavorable to achieve that objective. One way to measure strengths
and weaknesses is through job performance. Everyone has a set of abilities and talents they
can bring to each job. Yet, once inside the workplace, employees usually fall on different sides
of a performance line. Rarely is any employee perfect in every area of his duties. It takes much
observation to verify job performance.50 Once revealed, PA can be used to measure the
strengths and weaknesses of each employee during an appraisal process. Observing
respondents position about role of PA in self-control, 79% are convinced the manner in which
it helps supervisors feel more honest in their relationships with their subordinates and feel
better about themselves in their supervisorial roles; Subordinates are assured clear
understanding of what's expected from them, their own personal strengths and areas for
development and a solid sense of their relationship with their supervisor. Only 21% disagreed
role of PA to employees discovering their strengths and weaknesses to improve job
performance. May is a manager, employee or human resource professional assisting
employees with their career management. Or they may be looking for career change to
advance their own career.
Compensation and rewarding system:68.5% of respondents agreed existing role plays
employees ‗performance appraisal to link development, training, recognition with employees‘
promotion, transfer, and retention; but 31.5% disagreed .We can see that the staff gave the
important motivating factors to promotion. It is observe that the higher level of training and
development gives more meaningful to the staff for their future career.
The most important things that motivate employees are promotion, transfer, retention,
training, development, and recognition by the management. It can be analyze that employees
always see for their long-term benefits and advantages like promotion, where they can hold
higher post, through training and development, they can increase their knowledge, so that
they can always stay up-to-date with new environment. Whereas year-end-bonus is just
temporary benefits as such all the employees has rated very low, while promotion can result
to more important role and greater salary increase and also as a ladder for future career.
Reaching consensus in decision making and problem solving: in a systematic manner, it
identifies all resources available for help and involves peers and subordinates as necessary.
Assures proper documentation and follows up to ensure problem does not reoccur. Decisions
50
http://project-management-knowledge.com/definitions/s/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-
and-threats-swot-analysis/
54
are well thought out and made in a timely and logical manner. This an example of our
research where we have 71%of respondents who believe the role PA to reach consensus in
decision making and problem solving; while 29% don‘t believe so.
Problem solving and decision-making are important skills for business and life. Problem-
solving often involves decision-making, and decision-making is especially important for
management and leadership. There are processes and techniques to improve decision-making
and the quality of decisions. Decision-making is more natural to certain personalities, so these
people should focus more on improving the quality of their decisions. People that are less
natural decision-makers are often able to make quality assessments, but then need to be more
decisive in acting upon the assessments made. Problem-solving and decision-making are
closely linked, and each requires creativity in identifying and developing options, for which
the brainstorming technique is particularly useful.
Good decision-making requires a mixture of skills: creative development and identification of
options, clarity of judgment, firmness of decision, and effective implementation. For group
problem-solving and decision-making, or when a consensus is required, workshops help,
within which you can incorporate these tools and process as appropriate. Here are some useful
methods for effective decision-making and problem-solving: First a simple step-by-step
process for effective decision-making and problem-solving.51
51
http://tutor2u.net/business/strategy/PEST_analysis.htm
55
Workers‟ perspective: standing of the term ―conflict management‖ in the context of Health
care institution. The respondents gave varied opinions in regard to the concept of conflict
management.
The sample workers were requested to give their understanding of the term ―conflict
management‖ in the context of CHUK. The respondents gave varied opinions in regard to the
concept. According to the findings, conflict management refers to: taking care of the
differences that may occur in between individuals e.g. employee-managers or peers themselves
setting and resolving misunderstanding or dispute between two people/parties in an
institution; resolving conflict/ disputes arising out of the hospital activities;
resolving/managing any misunderstanding/ problems that may arise in the institution and
can interfere with smooth running of the institutions; handling conflict between workers; the
ability to solve a problem amicably within the institution; the ability to solve a problem within
the institution or between individuals; how conflict is handled when it occurs and how it is
prevented; restoration of order and stability; bringing into control or curbing the
disagreement in the in the hospital by devising methods of avoiding conflicts and creating
peace amongst the students and the teachers; ability to effectively communication one
another; and approaches to control misunderstandings among managers -employees and
subordinate staff.
The findings indicate different alternative helpful in the process of conflict management such
as reaching consensus, compromising, discussing, and negotiation. The findings also
indicate that the process of conflict management can only be initiated after the root cause of
the conflict has been identified. The findings of table14 indicate that most workers
interviewed 81.1% experience different ways in conflict management with their peers, while
18.5% of them don‘t. These stylistic differences frequently distort the communication process.
56
Faulty communication leads to misperceptions and misunderstandings that can lead to long-
standing conflict.
52
http://www.businessballs.com/customer_service.htm
57
appropriate, but 39.5% of them disagreed;68.5% of respondents out of 31.5% who disagreed
the contribution of reaffirms commitment to professional service customer service;75.3% out
of 25.9% who disagreed appreciate customer service the fact that customer contacts increases
customer independence;63% of interviewed out of 37% are motivated to respond to customer
requests time and 67.3% of respondents responds consistently the complexity of customer‘s
need while 32.7 don‘t.
The following benefits illustrate a more comprehensive view of the impact of P I C S on the
enterprise both big and small corporations and educational institutions. Note that these
benefits describe to P I C S as integrated with Knowledge management and performance
Support components. The emphasis is not merely on the use of technology, but on the
emergence of new organizational dynamics that are made possible when an enterprise utilizes
P I C S solutions.
They are probably right in such cases. They make an effort to be professional, project a
positive image and to address the needs and wants of their internal customers. The challenge
is that their organization‘s systems, policies and procedures often stand in their way.
53
http://www.enotes.com/management-encyclopedia/employee-evaluation-performance-appraisals
58
Quality of work Agree Disagree Agree Disagr Agree Disagre Agree Disagr
ee e ee
Job performance 116 46
71.6% 28.4%
Strengthening work 119 43
standards 73.5% 26.5%
Maintains regular 134 28
attendance 82.7% 17.3%
Adheres to instructions 141 21
87% 13%
improved job satisfaction for employees and higher levels of organizational performance.
Other quantitative studies into high performance work practices have also found support for
claims that employee work performance may be improved through the introduction of quality
circles, self-managing work teams, high-level investment in skills training, information
sharing and greater flexibility with the allocation of work tasks.
Judgment 123 39
75.9% 24.1%
Managing emotions 141 21
87% 13%
54
http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/janedut/Issue%20Selling/understandingorgadapt.pdf
61
Managing emotions for job adaptation in job performance: Lise M. Saari and Timothy A.
Judge (2004) 55experimented how long happy employees are productive employees ―happy
employees are not productive employees.‖ We hear these conflicting statements made by HR
professionals and managers in organizations. There is confusion and debate among
practitioners on the topic of employee attitudes and job satisfaction even at a time when
employees are increasingly important for organizational success and competitiveness.
According to respondents, the study explored the relationship between managing emotions
for patience, courtesy and poise in job situation. By 162 respondents, 87% of them agreed
existing relation to emotional management while 13% disagreed.
Job affects or emotions experienced on the job present a different set of conceptual and
assessment problems. Job affects and emotions are influenced by events that occur on the job.
Individual job events are likely to be infrequent and difficult to predict. Praise from a
supervisor, an overheard conversation in the hallway about a co-worker‘s evaluation, a just-
in-time delivery that was not-quite-in-time, a pilot being given an extensive holding
instruction to await departing traffic, or a surly customer are all job events and are generally
unpredictable. Yet they occur, and their occurrences often trigger job emotions. Assessments
of emotions on the job, carried out in near real-time several times during a work day, are
necessary to tap into event-affect-behaviour cycles and capitalize on the dynamic state nature
of affect.
55
Lise M. Saari and Timothy A. Judge (2004) Employees ‘attitudes and job satisfaction Wiley
Periodicals, Inc
63
Table.4.17.Indicators of effective PA
Degree Appreciating PA effectiveness
Agreement
Levels Agree Disagree Agree Disagree
of appreciation
More productive 59
35.1%
Productive 87
51.8%
Less productive 7
4.2%
Weakened 5
2.9%
Neutral 10
6%
56
http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_10_3_15.pdf
65
4.1.4.2. Variables influencing the satisfaction of the employees towards the PAS
The study findings of 21rst table indicate that, on an average, the level of satisfaction among
the respondents towards the PAS is at 69.5 per cent, which implies, on our scale, that the
respondents are ‗satisfied‘ with the PAS of the CHUK firms for whom they are working at
present.
A descriptive statistic analysis was made to identify the variables influencing the satisfaction
of the respondents towards the PAS of the CHUK firms under study (Table 21). A
significance level of ten items to be chosen was used for our analysis. Statistical results
shows that the variables of the objectivity in the appraisals (70.4%), the accuracy of the
previous appraisals (56.2% ) and viewing appraisals as a motivating tool (85.2%) are
significantly influencing the satisfaction of the respondents towards the PAS , The validity
(68.5%), transparency in the AS (75.3%), timeliness of the appraisals (69.1%), employee
participation in AS (51.2%),, recognition of special initiatives and efforts at the time of
appraisals (67.9%), and AS go in tandem with promotion, reward and transfer policies (69.8%)
have emerged as the significant variables.
PA is a critical HR process yet often yields unnerving experience for both employees and their
supervisors. Though several systematic methods and approaches are available to assess
employee performance, the element of subjectivity cannot be completely eliminated from the
process. Human judgment is far from perfect and this weakness is an important factor behind
the controversies associated with PA.
57
http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Per-Pro/Performance-Appraisal-and-
Standards.html
58
http://www.letsstartthinking.org/HR/performance-appraisal-rating-errors.asp
67
Apart from the inexactness of measurement, a few cognitive and perceptive problems often
cause the raters to make significant errors in judgment. Being aware of these pitfalls can make
the process more objective and could also reduce the unpleasantness that is caused as a
consequence of a poorly administered PA. These common rating errors has been categorized
by respondents as follow; hallo effect according to respondents takes a proportion of
0.6%,leniency and strictness error have3.1%,standars of evaluation problem takes
6.8%,opposition to evaluation is 1.9%,centre tendency error is 18.5%,judgement problem is
occupy 1.2% and system design and operating system is 8%.
People differ in their tendency to evaluate people or performance. Some supervisors are very
strict or conservative in their ratings and generally give low scores in their evaluations. This
tendency may make high performers attain somewhat average ranking and average
performers appear as poor performers. Raters with such tendency are known to have a
strictness bias.
On the other hand, some supervisors demonstrate a leniency bias and rate their subordinates
very liberally which may make even average performers seem like star performers, attaining
very high performance scores.
And yet, others "play safe" by rating around the golden mean - the average. This may be done
to avoid the necessity to justify scoring across the two extremes as some systems expect
managers to specify additional comments as they give too high or too low ratings to
employees. This rating error is known as the central tendency bias.
Often however, recent events tend to overshadow the overall performance. People do have
"short memories". Thus a person who has worked very hard and excelled throughout the
68
year, but for some inadvertent reasons had faced performance issues in the last weeks or
month may at times get a poor appraisal from the supervisor, showing a recency bias.
Unless Muhammad Ibal Malik (2007)condemn rating errors to be origin of with personal
bias that can affect PA, it includes a bias against a race, ethnicity, religion, age, sex, or
assuming that certain type or class of people are not suitable to perform a specific job or
function etc. If you believe for instance, that women are emotional and men are rational, then
chances are that you would not employ a female worker for a role that involves making
objective decisions. Similarly, an assumption that young workers are faster and more efficient
than old workers would make it more probable to give a higher efficiency rating to a younger
worker than an old worker.
59
4.1.4.4. PA problems and possible solutions essays60
Poor PA can be demoralizing, especially if we have tried our best to do a good job. We may
feel tempted to stop trying or, worse still, quit our job. But it is not the end of the world or
our career. We can overcome a poor review and use the experience to improve our job
performance so take a deep breath and prepare to overcome this temporary setback.61
59
Muhammad I bal Malik (2007) Rating Errors in Performance Appraisal© 2006-2011
LetsStartThinking.org. All rights reserved.
60
http://www.citeman.com/2510-appraisal-problems-and-solutions/
61
http://www.oppapers.com/subjects/performance-appraisal-problems-and-solutions-page1.html
69
81% 19 79.6 20.4 73.5 25.9 71. 28. 69.1 30.9 82.1 17.9 78.4 21.6
% % % % % 6% 4% % % % % % %
Mean of 76.5%
agreement
Employees „perceptions about measures to remediate poor PA
When received negative feedback about job performance, no matter have a panic. The first
step to recovering is to digest the news with poise. While it‘s natural to feel defensive or
angry during a bad review, career coaches advise against acting on these emotions to avoid
making matters worse. Problems of PA in CHUK have been discounted with some measures
to be transmitted to workers for their point of view. As indicated below, problems was
leniency error, hallo effect, centre tendency error, strictness error, and judgment problem,
opposition to evaluation, system design and operating system; aside we joined some measures
and have been appreciated as follow;81% of respondents agreed Keeping the cool when
received a negative appraisal, 79.6% of them don‘t refuse to sign the appraisal form;73.5%
agreed recording during appraisal process;71% behaves positively when receive poor
PA;69.1% agreed the A PA record to correct mistakes ;82.1% agreed let their boss know
taken responsibility for being a high-performing employee;78.4% agreed to be participate in a
performance improvement plan, with specific goals and timelines.
There is a huge amount of frustration and dissatisfaction with existing methods of formal
employee performance management and appraisal. Regardless of whether the approach is
based on rating scales, competency assessments, objectives, key performance indicators, or
other performance standards, rankings. While they all appear to work well enough in theory,
to a greater or lesser extent they all tend to fail in practice. They just don't seem to measure
up to the expectations that managers, employees, and organizations alike have for them. This
70
appears to be the case even when the implementation of a given method is well managed and
accompanied by proper training on how it should be used.
While it is difficult to quantify the negative effect that such a problem must have within an
organization, we know (at least intuitively) that it is probably staggering. For example, my
estimates indicate that, regardless of whether it is done formally or informally, only about
51.2 % includes employee‘s participation in the appraisal in an effective way. Since it is likely
that this population follows a normal statistical distribution it means that, for the remaining
49.8% per cent of managers, giving feedback and discussing performance with employees
remains a task that is easier said than done. This appears to be the case regardless of whether
or not they have previously received any training in how to do it properly.
Aside from the obvious negative consequences that a problem of this magnitude has on an
organization's productivity, the costs on a human level in terms of low morale and
demotivation may be equally devastating. While this cost is not necessarily quantifiable, it is
definitely reflected in the bottom line. Not being 'open and honest' with employees about their
performance, how they are perceived by management and what such a perception means for
the future, raises some important moral and ethical questions around an organization's
responsibility for, and often-stated commitment to, developing its employees.
The main objective of PA is to review employee performance over a certain period of time.
There are many other important objectives of PA as identify and close the gap between
current and desired performance, improve management's organizational control, improve the
working relationship between management and their subordinates, give insight into the
71
necessary training and development, provide impartial information to base promotion or pay
raise decisions on, and clarify job responsibilities. 62
By the same token, appraisal results are used to identify the poorer performers who may
require some form counselling, or in extreme cases, demotion, dismissal or decreases in pay.
Whether this is an appropriate use of PA the assignment and justification of rewards and
penalties is a very uncertain and contentious matter.
Objectives of performance appraisal Perhaps the most significant objective of appraisal is that,
in the rush and bustle of daily working life, it offers a rare chance for a supervisor and
62
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5407449_objectives-performance-appraisals.html
72
subordinate to have "time out" for a one-on-one discussion of important work issues that
might not otherwise be addressed.
Almost universally, where performance appraisal is conducted properly, both supervisors and
subordinates have reported the experience as beneficial and positive.
Appraisal offers a valuable opportunity to focus on work activities and goals, to identify and
correct existing problems, and to encourage better future performance.
There are many personality traits which could be considered when evaluating performance,
and methods to facilitate such consideration include scaling methods that differentiate
employees on a series of given traits. The important personality traits fall into two categories:
personal qualities and demonstrated qualities. Of course, one of main challenges is to
determine precisely what key qualities and personal attributes the interviewer or hiring
manager is looking for and being able to demonstrate managers‘ personal attributes as specific
work strengths.63
Meanwhile, all such department of CHUK have staff members who need to be trained,
motivated, satisfied and well-informed. Since running a learning resource setup is a
managerial task, it is essential that those running such department understand some basic
63
http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7505E/w7505e06.htm
74
principles of organizational behaviour and routine management principles so that they can
manage their respective centre in a better way.
As understanding personality is crucial for knowing behaviour of an individual in an
organization, we will discuss in this section of the unit the interface between personality and
organization. Personality refers to some qualities, characteristics skills and competencies of
behaviour of an individual in a defined situation. But there are certain uniform characteristics
which always emerge in a person on the basis of which certain inferences can be drawn.
Examples could be dominant or submissive nature, aggressiveness or politeness. Personality
consists of organization of feelings, thoughts, cognitions and visible behaviour. However
certain patterns of behaviour are not visible and are known only after proper testing.
Individuals along with certain other traits like grooming and attitude. Personality means very
specific patterns.
64
Rana Sinha (2008), Qualities Employers Seek in Employees
75
Of equal importance to skills are the values, personality traits, and personal characteristics
that employers seek. Look for ways to weave examples of these characteristics into our
resume, cover research, and answers to written interview questions.76.5% of respondents
underlined adaptability and dependability as of personal qualities observed to their employees,
appearance and bearing was agreed at 72.8% of respondents, decisiveness and ingenuity
chosen at 68.5% of respondents, 61.1% of respondents agreed drive and determination,
integrity and loyalty takes 78.4% of respondents, stamina, tenacity and maturity was agreed
at 80.2% of respondents, by the end verbal and written expressions was agreed at 70.4%.
By Rana Sinha (2008), qualifies the above qualities as employability skills and personal values
are the critical tools and traits we need to succeed in the workplace and they are all elements
that we can learn, cultivate, develop, and maintain over our lifetime. Once we have identified
the sought after skills and values and assessed the degree to which you possess, they
remember to document them and market them for job search success.
Managers can‘t think of themselves as better than their workers, or more favored because
they have a higher rank. Becoming manager is not a coronation, it‘s a promotion. And the fact
of being manager can‘t do everything. The purpose of an organization is to combine the
efforts of many people to produce results no one on his or her own could achieve alone.
Managers must understand that; they must live the goals they espouse; they must understand
that everyone inside the organization is looking at them scrutinizing them, really and also
that every action of theirs is being watched and talked about
In fact, the personality of managers has a significant impact on their behavior. Personality has
a significant influence on the way we think, feel and relate to other people. Extraverts and
introverts, for example, represent the opposite ends of key personality traits that affect how
people form and manage relationships with others and how they communicate- both at work
and in their personal lives.
Transformational leaders are those who develop a positive relationship with their
subordinates to strengthen the performance of the employees and thus the performance of the
organization. Transformational leaders help their subordinates look beyond their own needs.
76
They let them focus on the interest of the group as a whole. Transformational leaders may
achieve their goals in one of the following ways: First, they may stimulate their employees
intellectually. Second, they may be charismatic to their followers and serve as role models.
Third, they may persuade their employees to believe in the mission and its attainability.
Fourth, they may meet the emotional needs of their employees.65
Table.4.25.Demonstrated qualities of managers toward employees
Dependent Demonstrated qualities
variables Professional knowledge Responsibility Delegation and Control and
and Administrative of staff Motivation Morale
ability development
and foresight
Independent
Variables Ag Dis Ag Dis Ag Dis Ag Dis
Number and 130 32 128 34 139 23 122 40
percentage 80.2% 19.8% 79% 21% 85.8% 14.2% 75.3 24.75
%
65
http://www.unesco.org/education/aladin/paldin/pdf/course02/unit_14.pdf
77
and others, handle conflicts, coach and develop subordinates, delegate tasks, cope with varied
situations, use the time efficiently and analyze problems to reach appropriate decisions
4.1.5.3. Traits, behaviors, and outcomes to improve the workers competences through
PA
Domain competence describes the willingness and ability, on the basis of subject specific
knowledge and skills, to carry out tasks and solve problems and to judge the results in a way
that is goal-oriented, appropriate, methodological and independent.
Competence encompasses knowledge, skills, abilities, and traits. It is gained in the healthcare
professions through pre-service education, in-service training, and work experience.
Competence is a major determinant of provider performance as represented by conformance
with various clinical, non-clinical, and interpersonal standards. Measuring competence is
essential for determining the ability and readiness of health workers to provide quality
services. 66Although competence is a precursor to doing the job right, measuring performance
periodically is also crucial to determine whether providers are using their competence on the
job. A provider can have the knowledge and skill, but use it poorly because of individual
factors (abilities, traits, goals, values, inertia, etc.) or external factors (unavailability of drugs,
equipment, organizational supported)
66
appraisalhttp://www.unesco.org/education/aladin/paldin/pdf/course02/unit_14.pdf
78
Respecting social 98 64
values
60.5% 39.5%
There are many good reasons for measuring competence. Ministries of health, professional
organizations, and healthcare organizations must ensure that appropriate expectations for
competence are set and that their staffs perform to standard.
Comparing assessments of competence and job performance may indicate the extent to which
the organization provides the support needed for quality care. High competency and low
performance may signal that an organization is not providing the needed resources, has not
clarified standards of care, or is not rewarding effective performance or correcting poor
performance.
80
5.1. Productivity of PA
A PAS is a difficult and a challenge to human resource management, as it is linked with many
components i.e. purpose of the PA, the process, performance standard, culture of organization,
and how it impact employees productivity. The research has developed possible answer to the
research questions with partial support of respondents. The strong positive association
between PA comfort and PA we found the complementarily. We have listed seven functions of
the PA such as quality, quantity, initiative, job knowledge, timeliness, adaptability and
dependability. About the above functions, collected data indicates 91.5% of participants but we
have an assumed 81.6% confirmed said variable to be the key of productivity while only 18.8%
disagreed. For example,89.5%of respondents underlined the quality of work, according to
them it is appreciated its function played in defining the accuracy, skill, thoroughness,
professional presentation of work product; attention to detail;85.6% of respondents said that
the quantity of work produces for them required amount of work; 80.9% of respondents said
that job Knowledge establishes to them an understanding of required subject matter
relative to the position; comprehension of job procedures, department policies, work methods;
degree of supervision required; employee‘s efforts to keep abreast of changes impacting the
job and organization;82.1% said that initiative initiates and follow to them through on
relevant ideas to further the goals and mission of the department and the hospital;
independently identifies and completes work and projects; makes useful suggestions; 75.9% of
respondents said that dependability indicates to them the extent to which they effectively
and enthusiastically accomplish assignments with minimal supervision and 77.8% of
respondents appreciate adaptability to helps them an efficiency working under stress and
81
responds to change. Andrey Kiselev (2007) replies how fast employees who receive good
scores on their appraisals are generally motivated to perform well and maintain their
productivity. Positive feedback on appraisals gives employees a feeling of worth and value,
especially when accompanied by a raise while employee may feel a loss of motivation in the
workplace; if a supervisor gives an employee a poor score on her appraisal consequently, this
can impact the employee's productivity and performance.
All these above factors have to take into consideration for developing the effective PAS. From
the survey findings, the present PAS of CHUK can view as the following:
5.1.2. Work quality improvement and productivity
If middle workers of CHUK behave this way, then they are not to be blamed but thanked. Top
management cannot expect quality to happen if it is introduced and promoted only through
motivation; meet expected product, timeliness, planning, commitment, work habit, customer
services, feedback, accuracy, ability to meet standards. These was proved by respondents at
63.7% who strongly agreed and 27.7% who agreed the fact that quality leading to
improvement in customer service will make it much easier for marketing to increase sales and
market share. Unless quality is deployed clearly for those who strongly disagreed 2.9% of
respondents and5.7% of respondents who disagreed the fact that improvement qualities will
reduce if not eliminate most of the problems and fire-fighting in the course of their normal
work. Quality is the solution to their problems, and not a hindrance to their work.
slide, although not as pronounced among employees not covered by the work measurement
process as among those who were plant wide in every instance. Most people did not fully
comprehend the necessity for the change or how it ultimately might affect them. Rumours,
mostly negative, abounded, despite the company's communication effort.
Negotiation which occupy 61.7% of agreement to interviewees, are among the most
important of communication useful in CHUK to communicate the feedback, they negotiate
when they want to allocate resources or they negotiate because they want something and are
willing to offer something in exchange. For example, negotiation is great full, when they want
to take job, hire an employee, set wage, discussing PA, etc.
67
Filippo A, De Waal FBM (2000). Natural Conflict Resolution; Berkeley, A: University of California Press:conflict resolution
86
and how to use it to increase the performance of project team members. According to the
findings of the research, majority of respondents 81.5% identified different types of conflict
resolution process, for instance, reaching consensus, compromising, discussing and
negotiation; while minority of respondents 18.5%disagreed.
Conflict need not have destructive consequences. Attitudes and conflict management styles
play an important role in determining whether such conflict will lead to destructive or
mutually beneficial outcomes.
Findings of this study categorized these phrases into positive and negative attitude; one side
74.7% of respondents identify their positive attitude through punctuality, time management,
positive attitudes, individuality, professionalism and creativity while 25.3% of respondents
stay indifferent.
These workers who have positive are valuable asset to the institution and need to be
recognized and appreciated. Imagine an employee who comes to work each day with the goal
to do the very best job for the company, to be helpful and considerate to co-workers, and to be
respectful and helpful to the bosses is a huge benefit to the company. Some companies have
programs that recognize such behavior with nice lunches, letters of appreciation from senior
management, top performance awards and simple praise.
On the other side workers with negative attitude, 78.4% are condemned to use rigid method
of work, poor flexibility to change management, indifference of some workers, judgmental,
defensive, and closed-minded.
Shortell, S.M., kaluzny, A.D. (2000) reported that, negative attitudes may need to be
addressed by supervisors and managers. Any employee who is allowed to continuously exhibit
a negative attitude may bring down the morale of others. One way to address negative
attitudes is to meet with the employee and relay how the attitude is affecting others and work
88
performance. Be specific with examples of poor productivity and behavior. Since attitude can
be somewhat hard to define, it needs to be broken down with descriptions of the employee's
behavior, comments and actions, along with impacts on job performance. It is important to
separate the deed from the doer as attacking the employee's character may do more damage
than good.
Promote a positive attitude is during the hiring process. Watch for signs of negativity during
the initial interviews and discuss the company's philosophy and policy on workplace behavior
during the new employee orientation (meeting with new employee regarding policies and
procedures of the company)
Employees who feel a part of their workplace and can see evidence that they are making
meaningful contributions to the success of the organization will give extra effort to get the
job done. In a high-performance work environment, employees feel they are important to the
mission of the organization and that they are valued and recognized for their contributions.
They enjoy their work more. Something is different in a work environment like this! You can
feel it! Employees are excited about their work and put more energy into what they do. These
was revealed by findings in the case 71.6% of respondents viewed an improvement quality of
work in job performance; 73.5% of respondents recognizes how long strengthening work
standards helps them increasing quality of produced unity; 82.7% of respondents maintains
regular attendance to complete their work in a timely, capable and reliable manner 87% of
respondents adheres to instructions to exceed expectations.
performance. Good performance could, however, also changes in behavior, given new lesson
and resources .Improving performance may, however, reinforce management‘s planed changes
efforts and provide resources which enable further investment in organizational development.
Productive behavior is defined as employee behavior that contributes positively to the goals
and objectives of an organization. When an employee begins a new job, there is a transition
period during which he or she is not contributing positively to the organization. According to
our study, findings proved that, one side PA‘‘ is likely both more productive ‗‘said 35.1% and
68
Weitzman, M. L. & Kruse, D. L. (1990). Profit sharing and productivity. In A. S. Blinder
(Ed.), Paying for productivity.
90
―productive ―said 51.8%; on the other side, minority of respondents PA both ―less productive‖
or ―weakened‖ said 2.9% of respondents
In financial terms, productive behavior represents the point at which an organization begins
to achieve some return on the investment it has made in a new employee.[Industrial
organizational psychologists are typically more focused on productive behavior rather than
simple job or task performance because of the ability to account for extra-role performance in
addition to in-role performance. While in-role performance tells managers or researchers how
well the employee performs the required technical aspects of the job, extra-role performance
includes behaviors not necessarily required as part of the job but still contribute to
organizational effectiveness. By taking both in-role and extra-role performance into account,
industrial–organizational psychologists are able to assess employees' effectiveness (how well
they do what they were hired to do), efficiency (their relative outputs to relative inputs), and
their productivity (how much they help the organization reach its goals).
Moreover, employees tend to lose their trust in the system when ratings do not accurately
reflect their performance levels, and this causes morale and turnover problems. Fortunately,
accurate ratings errors seem to be rare according to this research, then inaccuracy is most
often attributable to the presence of rater errors, typically, raters do not consciously choose to
make these errors, and they may not even recognize when they do make them.
In short Kraiger, Kurtet al (1985) supported the same ideas on how both appraisees,
appraisers (managers), and companies all reap benefits from effective PA . Appraisees benefit
in a number of ways; for example, they discover what is expected of them and are able to set
goals. They also gain a better understanding of their faults and strengths and can adjust
behavior accordingly. In addition, appraisals create a constructive forum for providing
feedback to workers about individual behavior, and for allowing workers to provide input to
their managers. Finally, appraisees are (ideally) given assistance in creating plans to improve
behavior, and are able to get a better grasp on the goals and priorities of the company.
what to do next. Do not take an unfair performance review lying down and feeling there is
nothing you can do about it; it is time to act but good planning must precede action. There is
always a possibility to change the decision in your favor. Here are some steps to help you
towards your next plan and action:
Findings has described errors based on the personal bias like , leniency error and strictness
error halo effect, central tendency error, standards of evaluation problem, Opposition to
evaluation judgment problem, system design and operating problems (i.e. one trait
influencing the evaluator‘s rating for all other traits) etc. may creep in the appraisal process.
Therefore the rater should exercise objectivity and fairness in evaluating and rating the
performance of the employees. Even when a performance evaluation program is structured
appropriately, its effectiveness can be diluted by the improper use of subjective, as opposed to
objective, measures. Findings have listed possible steps that can help an effective plan and
action of the PA: 81% of respondents agreed keep the cool when received a negative appraisal,
79.6% accept sign the appraisal form, 73.5% suggest recording during appraisal process,
71.6% have positive attitude when receive poor PA, 69.1% suggest a PA record to correct
mistakes, 82.1% are free let their boss know taken responsibility for being a high-performing
and 78.4% participate in a performance improvement plan.
Poor performance is an issue that worries managers and employees alike. It is of concern to
senior managers because it is a measure of how effectively the organization is led. But people
in organizations do not always feel their organization tackles poor performance appropriately
a hard nut to crack. Dealing with poor performance is an emotive issue. It is perhaps not
surprising; therefore, that many organizations fail to address it. In our research, we have a
cumulative mean 76.5% of employees ‗perceptions about seven steps workers shared their
perspectives on the issue.
individual and plan for future performance. Finally, talking about mutual goals, the emphasis
is on growth and development, harmony, effectiveness and profitability.
A PAS takes a standard approach to evaluating how employees do their jobs. Findings
proved that there are many factors that impact an AS's success rate, but five factors will help
employers focus on employee success.74.1% of respondents underlined communication, 69.1%
agreed with training, 84% suggested Follow-up,77.2% focused on evaluation and 85.8%
performance improvement perceived .PA are supposed to evaluate the performance of a
worker, reward good performance with promotions and pay raises and set goals to help
employees continue to improve. In reality, however, PA is affected by a wide range of
psychological factors. Even when supervisors are working with a well-defined guideline to
evaluate workplace performance, they can easily fall off track with results disadvantageous to
both the worker and the company.
To handle an employee after a PA, Helen Vella (2011) advices us use good communication,
document all agreements so that promises are kept, and manage deadlines. Make sure the
employee and the employer both know where they stand after an AS. There should be good
communication after, following up with an AS. Both of us should know the deadlines,
anything that was promised in there by party, the employer or the employee, should be
written down and deadlines should be met. There should be a system whereby we can track
what you've said and that both of us know exactly what's going on. Manage the deadlines
with their up line whoever that is and make sure we've got really good documentation. The
documentation is very important because when we're appraising our staff or we're receiving
and appraisal either way, both of us should keep good documentation because when
something is said then the promises have got to be kept and both of us know, have to know
what the promises were, so good communication is key.
The managers were informed that the purpose of this study was to investigate how different
managers evaluate an employee‘s work performance. Obviously; there are some personality
predispositions, which are favorable "to managerial effectiveness and to the success of
94
managers. Findings of the study distinguished both personal qualities and demonstrated
performance qualities.80.9% of respondents ‗some are personal qualities while 87% qualified
them demonstrated performance qualities. Personal qualities refer to the ways in which that
personal attributes affect workers, work may not be obvious. By the same token, results of this
research listed personal qualities that manager ought to have to conducting successful PA;
76.5% of respondents underlined adaptability and dependability ;72.8% perceived appearance
and bearing;68.5% agreed decisiveness and ingenuity; 61.1% chosen driving and
determination, 78.4% cry integrity and loyalty ; 80.2% agreed with stamina, tenacity and
maturity ;and 70.4% thought verbal and written expression . But having the right attributes
for the job are important to success, but demonstrated qualities are some of the personality
traits that may indicate the success of an employee in a position include agreeableness,
conscientiousness, extroversion, emotional stability and openness to new experiences. Here
are demonstrated qualities as shown the table no29; 80.2% of respondents believe professional
knowledge and administrative ability to conducting the PA, 79% recognize their
responsibility of staff development and foresight, 85.8% agreed with in delegation and
Motivation and 75.3% use control and moral. Employers and human resource managers
evaluate applicants for positions with a company to determine how well they will perform on
the job. Newstrom. Davis (1993) reported that personality traits are one of the factors that
may help managers determine the best worker for a position. Human resource departments
and managers can administer personality tests to job applicants to help in the hiring
decision.Popular characteristics or traits include shyness, aggressiveness, submissiveness,
laziness, ambition, loyalty, and timidity. This distinctiveness, when they are exhibited in a
large number of situations, are called personality traits. The more consistent the
characteristic and the more frequently it occurs in diverse situations, the more important that
trait is in describing the individual.
The worker's ability to be agreeable while performing a job also can indicate employee
performance. For example, a worker with an extroverted personality would be well suited in a
sales position, while an introverted worker may succeed in a research position or one with
95
69
Robbins, S.P(2003)Essential of organizational behavior Organizational Upper Saddle
River,NJ:Prentice Hall
96
2. Evaluate the employee after his probationary period. Probationary periods are generally six
months, but may vary depending on the organization. During this period, it is a good idea to
meet weekly or every other week with the employee to ensure that he has the knowledge and
skills to be successful, that he is learning and becoming proficient at his job, that he is a good
fit for the organization, and that following the probationary period, you will have sufficient
information to permanently employ or terminate him. Remember to document what is
discussed and agreed upon during these meetings. But evaluating employees won‘t be
productive when employees are not communicated the feedback. The PIP can help, because it
may include a number of steps designed to alert the employee to performance or other
deficiencies and encourage improvements in performance. These steps are: verbal
communication, written communication, hearing, and feedback, and negotiation, empathy,
reaching and reaching agreement. These were agreed by 79.6% of respondents while 20.4% of
respondents disagreed
3. Schedule regular meetings employees is also important, these meetings can be held
monthly, quarterly, or on some other predetermined schedule. During these meetings, discuss
the employee's goals and objectives, strengths and weaknesses, areas for improvement,
training needs, and any other issues that will increase the employee's productivity and
retention. Make sure which document what is discussed, areas that need to be addressed, and
deadlines for when improvements need to be made. This process will help eliminate any
unexpected surprises.
97
4. Determine the type of evaluation tool employee'd like to use for the annual performance
review. He can use a standard evaluation tool, with only the supervisor evaluating the
employee, or he can conduct a 360 degree evaluation, where the employee's supervisor, peers,
subordinates, and stakeholders outside of the organization provide feedback regarding the
employee's performance. Whatever tool he use, he have to make sure that it is current,
designed to measure what he want it to, is applicable to the employee's position, and contains
the employee's annual performance goals and objectives.
In order to bring goal clarity and objectivity, the organization should strive to develop a
system whereby the performance evaluation criteria are jointly determined by both the rater
and the rate. In addition, effective two way communication must be part of the performance
planning process prior to any evaluation to set the standard by which employees‘ performance
will be judged.
5. Remind employee of his annual performance evaluation at least two weeks in advance, and
how the evaluation will be conducted. This will give employer and employee adequate time to
prepare. Some employers like to have the employee conduct a self-evaluation prior to the
actual performance review, to see how the employee evaluates himself in relation to the
achievement of his goals and objectives. During the actual review, the employer will discuss
his observations in comparison to how the employee rated himself.
By conducting regular meetings with your employee throughout the year, discussing progress
on his goals and objectives, training needs, and other job-related issues/concerns, this keeps
the communication channels open, eliminating any unexpected surprises. In addition,
remember to create a warm and safe environment to put the employee at ease during his
evaluation. All of the above steps should help facilitate a more productive and successful
performance review.
In this study as many as 58.6% of workers described their jobs as very stressful. While not a
scientific gauge and not measuring serious stress health problems, this gives some indication
as to how prevalent work-related stress is. Employers should provide a stress-free work
environment, recognize where stress is becoming a problem for staff, and take action to
reduce stress. Stress in the workplace reduces productivity, increases management pressures,
and makes people ill in many ways, evidence of which is still increasing. Workplace stress
98
affects the performance of the brain, including functions of work performance; memory,
concentration, and learning. When recognize signs of stress in a staff member, especially if is
that person's manager, he shouldn‘t ignore it do something about it. It is his duty to do so. If
he does not feel capable of dealing with the situation, he should not ignore it; he must refer it
to someone who can deal with it. He must also look for signs of non-work-related stressors or
factors that increase susceptibility to stress, because these will make a person more vulnerable
to work related stressors.
development and availability of standards of nursing care, the review and development of
appraisal instruments, and further research are needed.
100
REFERENCES
1. Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the
organization: an examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior
2. Arthur P. Brief, (1984) PA: Current Issues in PA
3. Barton P. Miller, Mark D. Callaghan, Jonathan M. Cargille, Jeffrey K. Hollingsworth, R.
(1995)Special issue on performance evaluation tools for parallel and distributed computer
systems.
4. Beer, M. (1981). Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities. Organizational
Managers Do Differently. NY: Simon & Schuster.
7. Craig, S. E., Beatty, R. W., & Baird, L. S. (1986), creating a performance management
system. Training and Development Journal,
8. David Hakala (2008), 16Ways to measure employee‘s performance satisfaction
10. Dobbins, G. H., Cardy, R. L., & Platz-Vieno, 7.S. J. (1990, September). A contingency
approach to appraisal satisfaction
15. McClelland, D.C. 1988. Human Motivation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN
18. Mount, M. K., Judge, J. A., Scullen, S. E., Sytsma, M. R., and Hezlett, S. A. (1998). "Trait,
Rater, and Level Effects in 360-Degree Performance," Personnel Psychology, 51,3
20. Muhammad R. K, Ziauddin F.A. J and M. I. Ramay (2010). The Impacts of Organizational
Commitment on Employee Job Performance. European Journal of Social Sciences,
21. Newstrom, John W. & Davis, Keith (1993).Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at
Work. New York: McGraw-Hill.
101
22. Lise M. Saari and Timothy A. Judge (2004) Employees ‘attitudes and job satisfaction Wiley
Periodicals, Inc
23. Luchak, A. A., & Gellatly, I. R. (2007). A comparison of linear and nonlinear relations
between organizational commitment and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology,
25. Oberg (19670), Implementation and Evaluation. Bureau of Industrial Relations, Steel, R.
P., &
26. Robbins, S.P (2003) Essential of organizational behavior Organizational Upper Saddle
River,NJ:Prentice Hall
27. Sharon L. Mikrut (2009),Six Steps To Creating More Productive Staff Performance
Evaluations. Copyright 2009 ©
28. Shortell, S.M., kaluzny, A.D.(2000).Health care management(4th.Ed).Albany,NY.Thomson
Delmar Learning
29. Steel, R. P., & Mento, A. J. (1986). Impact of situational constraints on Subjective and
objective criteria of managerial job performance. Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes.
30. Sonam D. (2006) Performance appraisal;a case study of CHHUKHA Hydro power
corporation limited,bhutan
31. Webb, N.J., & Blandin. J. (2006). Evaluating executive performance in the public sector
32. Weitzman, M. L. & Kruse, D. L. (1990). Profit sharing and productivity. In A. S. Blinder
(Ed.), Paying for productivity.
33. Kraiger, Kurt, and J. Kevin Ford. "A Meta-analysis of Ratee Race Effects in Performance
Ratings." Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985.
Electronic sources:
1. http://www.enotes.com/buseness-finance-finance-encyclopedia/performance-appraisal: online on
11/06/2011
2. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7505E/w7505e06.htm: online on 11/06/2011
3. http://www.hr.arizona.edu/05_prf/ratingfactors.ph: online on 11/06/2011
4. http://www.citehr.com/52890-what-performance-appraisal.html: online on 11/06/2011
5.http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=context+historical+background+of+health+system+in+rwa
nda&oq=context+historical+background+of+health+system+in+rwanda: online on 11/06/2011
6.http://www.usaid.gov/rw/our_work/for_partners/images/rwandahealthsectorstrategicplanii.pdf:
online on 11/06/201
7. http://www.chk.org.rw/: online on 11/06/2011
8. http://rwanda.usembassy.gov/medical_information.html: online on 11/06/2011
9.http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=Structure+of+Rwanda+health+insurance&btnG=Google+Se
arch&oq=Structure: online on 11/06/2011
10. http://www.jstor.org/pss/3379942: online on 11/06/2011
11http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/performance-appraisal-procedure/: online on
11/06/2011
12. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W7505E/w7505e06.htm: online on 11/06/201
13.http://www.openlearningworld.com/olw/courses/books/Performance%20and%20Potential%20A
ppraisal/PerformanceAppraisal.html: online on 11/06/2011
14. http://www.humanresources.hrvinet.com/performance-appraisal-methods/: online on
11/06/2011
15. http://appraisals.naukrihub.com/modern-method.html: online on 11/06/2011
16.http://www.explorehr.org/articles/Performance_Appraisal/Performance_Appraisal_Methods.ht
ml: online on 11/06/2011
17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation: online on 11/06/2011
102
31. http://www.oppapers.com/subjects/performance-appraisal-problems-and-solutions-page1.html:
on 29/09/2011
32.http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Per-Pro/Performance-Appraisal-and-
Standards.html: on 29/09/2011
33.http://www.letsstartthinking.org/HR/performance-appraisal-rating-errors.asp:
on 29/09/2011
34 http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/janedut/Issue%20Selling/understandingorgadapt.pdf: on
29/09/2011
35.http://project-management-knowledge.com/definitions/s/strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-
and-threats-swot-analysis/: on 29/09/2011
36.http://www.uchastings.edu/hr/docs/performance-appraisal.pdf:on 29/09/2011
37. http://www.google.rw/webhp?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla: on 29/09/2011
The estimated total budget amount at RWF.2028075 (Two millions twenty eight thousand
seventy five Rwandan franc or USD 4056(For thousand fifty six four US dollars Annex 2:
Implementation timeline
103
Writing * *
research
proposal
* Researcher
Construction of
research
instrument
Data collection- * Researcher
survey
Data * * * Researcher+
processing supervisor
analysis
Writing * Researcher+
dissertation supervisor
first draft
Final Researcher
dissertation +supervisor
104
1. Gender: Male
Female
3. Age: A. 19-29
B. 30-49
C. 50- and older
1. What are the functions do you believe are served by PA system in this hospital?
Quality Quantity Initiative Job knowledge Adaptability Dependability None Others
3. What type improvement quality do you recognize the PA met in this hospital? Work habit
Motiva Meet Timeli Commit Plann Wo Custo Feedb Accur Abilit No Oth
tion expecte ness ment ing rk mer ack acy y to ne ers
d hab servic meet
product it e standa
ivity rds
105
5. What are expectations did you get after PA in the last two years?
Organizin Plannin Trainin Coachin Counselin Creativit Monitorin Non Other
g g g g g y g e s
11. Customer service is an improvement quality which can prove credibility of an institution; how is it
benefic to you as employees?
Serves Acknowledg Uses Respond Advises in Non Other
customers e Reaffirms customer s to a manner e s
in a shortcoming commitmen contacts as customer consistent
manner s when t to opportunitie requests with the
that appropriate professional s for on complexit
increases service education to contact y and
their increase date or nature of
confidence customer within the
and independenc 24hours customer‘s
knowledg e need
e to
resolve
their own
problems
12. Work habit as a manner in which an employee conducts his or herself in the working, how does the
PA help you developing it efficiently?
Displays Demonstrates Maintains Meets productivity None Others
professionalism effective time Shows regular standards
management positive attendance
skills attitude
15. How does PA help you to perform well as result of job knowledge development?
Able to answer Effectively Management Maintains-up -to date job None Others
difficult questions learns new skills related information
skills
107
17. Dependability as defined as Volunteers assistance to other personnel, how can PA help you in this
case?
Team Shares Interpers Attend Takes on Perform Follows Ada To N Oth
worki ideas onal ance new s duties - pt to improv on ers
ng and relations responsi with through chan e e
suggest bility minimu on work ge workin
ions m of assignm g
instructi ents situatio
ons. ns and
solve
proble
ms
18. Productivity as an indicator of degree to which employees produces the expected quality and
quantity of assignments, how the PA can help to set these variables?
Attains conclusive Maintains control Completes assignments on time None Others
measurable results and workplace and to specification
19. The following factors are related to the PA effectiveness; which of them is likely operational in
your hospital?
Cost Delegation Development Leadership Staff development Supervisin None Others
effectivenes and of g staff
s supervisory subordinates relation
skills
The extent The extent Employee‘s Employee‘s Degree to which The extent
to which to which the ability to ability to employees provide to which
employees employee evaluate direct the opportunities to the
use seeks shows the aptitude, operations, change employees
best use of ability to knowledge, activity and subordinate‘s oversees
materials effectively skills and performance capabilities and and
equipment, authorize interest of others develops the facilitates
and staff to work and knowledge and staff
maximize supervise skills necessary
efficiency subordinates for the career
and development
effectivenes
s
108
20. Productivity as an indicator of degree to which employees produces the expected quality and
quantity of assignments, how the PA can help you to set these variables?
Attains conclusive Maintains control and Completes assignments on time None Others
measurable results workplace and to specification
22. What types of problems which are obstacles to the successful 0f the PA of your institution?
Hallo Leniency Standards of Opposition Centre Judgment System None Others
effect error evaluation to tendency problem design and
problem evaluation operating
problems
23. What are measures that should be defined to overcome those problems?
Keep Do not Keep a record Show up for Let your Ask to None others
your cool refuse to throughout the work every Ask for an boss know participate in
when sign the year that day with a opportunity that you take a
you appraisal documents your more to meet responsibility performance
receive a form accomplishments positive again the for being a improvement
negative when the and attitude correct any high- plan, with
appraisal. appraisal performance. than you perceptions performing specific goals
is had before or mistakes employee. and time
complete. you in your lines
received the performance
poor record.
performance
appraisal
24. What are for you indicators of work behaviour analysis did you observe to your employees through
the PA done in this hospital?
Punctuality Individuality professionalism rigid poor judgmental, indifference creativity Others
and time method flexibility to defensive, of some
management, of change closed- workers
work management minded
109
25. What are variables that can influence the satisfaction of the employees towards the performance
Appraisal system?
Valid Expect Tran Timeline Employe Objectivi Recognit PA Appraisal Apprais othe
ity ed spare ss of the es ty of the ion of accurac policies go al are rs
knowle ncy appraisal participa appraisal special y in tandem mostly
dge to tion in initiative with seen as
apprais the s and promotion a
e appraisal efforts at , reward motivat
the time and ing tool
of transfer
appraisal policies
s
110
4. What are personal qualities do you observe through PA done in this hospital?
Adapta Appea Decisiv Depend Drive Ingen Initia Integ Loy Sta tena Matu
bility rance eness ability and uity tive rity alty min city rity
and determi a
bearin nation
g
5. What are demonstrated qualities do you observe from PA met in this hospital
Professio Administrat Responsibi Foresig Delegati Motivati Mora contr Non Othe
nal ive ability lity of staff ht on on le ol e rs
knowledg developme
e nt
6. As supervisor of a given service, what are qualities do you beneficiate from PA done in this
hospital?
Cost Delegatio Developme Leadersh Performan Staff Supervisi Non Othe
effectivene n and nt of ip ce developme ng staff e rs
ss superviso subordinat appraisal nt relations
ry skills e
7. What are traits, behaviors, and outcomes should the PA of your hospital consider to improve the
productivity of your institution?
Abi Atti Beha Bel Compe Perfor Engag Enviro Experi Feel Inte Motiv Nat
de lity vior ief tencies mance ement nment ences ings ntio ation ure
level n
8. How do you evaluate the productivity of this hospital in the period before and after
PA?.......................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................