2012 - Analysis of Swirling Flow in Hydrocyclones Operating Under Dense Regime
2012 - Analysis of Swirling Flow in Hydrocyclones Operating Under Dense Regime
net/publication/271614258
CITATIONS READS
53 2,000
4 authors, including:
Arun K Majumder
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
61 PUBLICATIONS 1,090 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Florent Bourgeois on 16 October 2019.
Minerals Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mineng
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: There are many circumstances where hydrocyclone performance and dense flow are intertwined, such as
Available online 22 February 2012 for example when feed solids flow exceeds hydrocyclone capacity during continuous operations. The work
reported here, which is part of an ongoing research effort to develop a robust CFD model for prediction of
Keywords: hydrocyclone performance, focuses on hydrocyclone operation under high solids concentration. The paper
Hydrocyclone presents the basic physics framework that accounts for solid–liquid and solid–solid interactions under
CFD hydrocyclone’s swirling flow. Operating conditions that are past the transition from spray to rope regime
Solids concentration
are deliberately chosen for this purpose. Model predictions are validated by comparison with solids split
Roping
and separation curves measured on a 100 mm diameter hydrocyclone. CFD model predictions permit tak-
ing an insightful look at the inside of a hydrocyclone under extreme operating conditions, which would be
difficult to achieve experimentally. Velocity profiles, G-force distribution and distribution of solids pre-
dicted by CFD are bound to lead to a better understanding of the separation that takes place inside a hydro-
cyclone, which may eventually help improve hydrocyclone design and performance.
Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0892-6875/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2012.01.012
Author's personal copy
The multi-field mass balance equation for field k is written According to Gourdel et al. (1999), the momentum exchange
(when k = l, we refer to the liquid and k = p to the class p of due to collisions between particle q and particle p can be written
particles): as:
@ @ mq 1 þ ec H1 ðZ pq Þ
ðak qk Þ þ ðak qk U k;i Þ ¼ 0 ð1Þ Iq!p;i ¼ ap qp ðU p;i U q;i Þ ð9Þ
@t @xi mp þ mq 2 scpq
with ak, qk, Uk, the volumetric fraction, the density and the mean mp and mq are respectively the mass of particle p and particle q,
velocity of phase k. ec is the inelastic restitution coefficient and scpq the collision char-
The multi-fluid momentum balance equation for phase k is de- acteristic time.
fined as follows: The momentum exchange term presented in Eq. (9) comple-
@ @ ments the monodisperse model. When mp = mq(monodisperse),
ðak qk U k;i Þ þ ðak qk U k;j U k;i Þ Up = Uq yielding Iq?p,i equals to zero.
@t @xj
H1(Zpq) is a theoretical function that permits adapting the ki-
@P X @
¼ ak þ Iðq!kÞ;i þ ak qk g i þ T k;ij ð2Þ netic theory of gases to that of granular flow.
@xi q¼p;g @xj
with P the mean pressure, gi the acceleration due to gravity and Tk,ij 2.2. Turbulence modeling
the effective stress tensor.
I(l?p),i accounts for momentum transfer rate from the liquid to Ensemble averaging is usually applied to instantaneous Navier–
solid phase (friction), while I(q?p),i represents the momentum ex- Stokes equations in order to study industrial flows. These new
change by collision between particles q and p. In order to account equations are called Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)
for collisions between different particle sizes, the mean momen- equations.
tum transfer between phases I(q?p),i has been generalized in this The effective stress tensor, Tk,ij, in Eq. (2) can be written as
study compared to the validation on dilute regime (Davailles follows:
et al. (in press)). T k;ij ¼ ak qk Rk;ij þ Hk;ij ð10Þ
The mean liquid to particle momentum transfer can be modeled
using an estimate of the drag acting on particles. It contains two contributions: a turbulent kinetic stress tensor
Rk,ij due to turbulence (or fluctuations in phase k) and a collisional
ap qp
Iðl!pÞ;i ¼ Iðp!lÞ;i ¼ V ð3Þ (or molecular viscosity) term Hk,ijfor the solid (alt. liquid) phase.
sFlp r;i The constitutive relations for viscosity and diffusivity are derived
1 3 ql hC D ip in the framework of the kinetic theory for dry granular flows.
with ¼ hjV r ji ð4Þ
sFlp 4 qp dp According to Batrak et al. (2005), the solid stress tensor Tp,ij can
be written as:
Kinetic stress
sFlp is the particle relaxation time scale, and h ip is the ensemble zfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffl
ffl}|fflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffl
ffl{
average operator over the particulate phase (Simonin, 1996). Vr,i is @U p;m @U p;i @U p;j 2 @U p;m
T p;ij ¼ Pp kp dij lp þ dij
the average of the local relative velocity which can be expressed in @xm @xj @xi 3 @xm
|fflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffl{zfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflfflffl}
terms of the averaged velocity between phases and the drift veloc- Collisional stress
ity. The mean drag coefficient related to an isolated particle, hCDip
can be written as a function of particulate Reynolds number. Under with lp = lp,col + lp,cin + lp,fric.
moderately concentrated suspension to dense regime, the multi- The terms lp,col and lp,cin represent the kinetic viscosity and the
fluid approach accounts for local particle volume fraction ap collisional viscosity respectively (Batrak et al. (2005)).
through a correction to the drag law. Under these conditions, we When the particulate volume concentration is high (typically
adopt the approach published by Gobin et al. (2003), who proposed ap P 0.5), the assumption of instantaneous binary collision is often
to use a combination of two relations: Wen and Yu (1965) for di- inaccurate as enduring contacts are prone to occur. Frictional ef-
lute cases and Ergun (1952) for concentrated regime. fects are accounted for by adding a frictional viscosity lp,fric as de-
8 scribed by Srivastava and Sundaresan (2003).
>
> if ap > 0:3 Because of the strong anisotropy of the flow, the Reynolds Stress
>
> D E D E
>
> Model (RSM) due to Launder et al. (1975) seems naturally better
>
< Min C Wen Yu
; C Ergun
D D
hC D ip ¼
p p
ð5Þ suited than models based on an assumption of isotropy of the Rey-
>
> if ap 6 0:3 nolds stress tensor, such as the familiar k turbulence model.
>
> D E
>
> With RSM, the turbulent viscosity approach has been comple-
>
: C Wen Yu
D
p mented and the Reynolds stresses hqfuf,iuf,jif are computed directly
to close RANS equations. This is done by solving the differential
with transport equations, leading to heavier computational costs. The
D E ap 7 exact Reynolds stress transport equation accounts for the direc-
C Ergun
D ¼ 200 þ ð6Þ tional effects of the Reynolds stress fields. The Reynolds stress
p Rep 3
model has been extended to multiphase flows.
8 For the particles, particle fluctuating kinetic energy, q2p and fluid-
> if Rep < 1000
>
> particle fluctuating velocity covariance, qfp are solved through a set
D E >
< a1:7 24
1 þ 0:15Re0:687 of coupled transport equations. For polydisperse solid phase, the
C Wen
D
Yu
¼ l Rep p
ð7Þ
p >
> particle agitation transport equation contains some specific terms
>
> if Rep P 1000
: (Gourdel et al., 1999; Batrak et al., 2005) that account for three phe-
0:44a1:7
l nomena: particle agitation dissipation by non-elastic polydisperse
collisions, production of particle agitation by the mean solid rela-
al ql dp hjV r ji tive velocity and finally, transfer of particle agitation between dif-
Rep ¼ ð8Þ
ll ferent classes of the solid phase.
Author's personal copy
3. Experimental work
Fig. 4. Size distribution of silica particles: measured (symbols) and discretized for
numerical simulation (solid line).
Fig. 6. Measured partition function for 10 wt% to 50 wt% feed solids concentration
with the 18 mm diameter spigot.
Table 2
Feed solids concentration influence on cut-sizes and solids recovery to the underflow.
tern. It is noted that the hydrocyclone did not choke under the con-
ditions of Table 2.
As the objective of this study is the understanding of the hydro-
cyclone hydrodynamics with roping discharge, this paper focuses
on feed solids content higher than 30 wt% (14 vol.%).
Fig. 7. Photographs of the underflow discharge with feed solid content of 10 wt% and 30 wt%.
Table 3
Mass distribution of water and solids inside the hydrocyclone body.
Fig. 10. Water tangential velocity profile in the cylindrical section of the hydro- Fig. 12. Distribution of liquid volume fraction (=1 – solid volume fraction) inside
cyclone, taken 100 mm under the roof. the hydrocyclone.
Author's personal copy
Fig. 13. Evolution of the tangential velocity along the height of the hydrocyclone
Fig. 15. Influence of spigot diameter on separation curves.
with 30 wt% feed solids content.
Table 4
Influence of spigot diameter on the mass of liquid and solids inside the hydrocyclone
body.
Fig. 14. Evolution of the G-force profiles along the height of the hydrocyclone with
30 wt% feed solids content.
mance of the hydrocyclone. The solid that fills this region of the
hydrocyclone reduces the volume available for separation, as it
gives an effective geometry for classification that is different from
the physical geometry of the hydrocyclone. In the end, the simula-
tion results show that the internal geometry of the hydrocyclone
where swirling flow is occurring gradually evolves from that of a
classifying cyclone to that of a stub cyclone. The notion of effective
versus physical geometry of the hydrocyclone, as modified by the
solids concentration inside the hydrocyclone, is deemed an
important concept that underlies separation efficiency of the
hydrocyclone.
As discussed in the previous Section 4.1, an increase of the total Fig. 16. Influence of spigot diameter on liquid volume fraction.
solids mass inside the hydrocyclone reduces the separation perfor-
mance by slowing down the tangential velocity (hence the G-force)
inside the hydrocyclone, which is the real separation driver. This separation performance (see Fig. 15). As per the measurement,
also yields an increase in both water and fines recovery to the the fines ratio decreases with decreasing spigot diameter, which
underflow. A further decrease of the spigot diameter from 18 mm is correlated to the water split.
to 6 mm was found in Section 3.2.2 to give a lower recovery to The change from the 18 mm to the 6 mm spigot affects particles
underflow with both fines and water under the same feed condi- in a different manner, which depends on their diameter. This can
tions, recalling that the hydrocyclone was already roping with be appreciated through the evolution of the mass of individual size
the 18 mm spigot. classes inside the hydrocyclone are reported in Table 4.
The same trend is found by numerical simulations, however With a small spigot diameter, the largest particles are more
simulation tends to overestimate the effect of spigot diameter on concentrated inside the hydrocyclone, and more of the smaller
Author's personal copy
particles report to the overflow. Despite the reduced separation 99% of the feed mass flow rate report to the overflow, which
performance (see Fig. 15), the hydrocyclone is able to separate par- would correspond to the hydrocyclone choking in practice. De-
ticles under the conditions of the test. spite the fact that the simulations give interesting trends about
Fig. 16 reveals that there is a low solids concentration area in the effect of dense regime on hydrocyclone separation behavior,
the cylindrical part of the hydrocyclone with both spigots. The con- it also shows that the current simulation CFD code is not yet able
sequence is that there is still sufficient tangential velocity (see to predict all that happens inside the hydrocyclone as the hydro-
Fig. 17) to yield some classification. The increase in cut size is cyclone did not choke under these conditions. The discrepancies
not correlated with a decrease in tangential velocity 100 mm from can also been seen in the predicted and measured partition func-
the roof, as seen with the larger spigot at the highest solids concen- tions of Fig. 15.
tration (Fig. 10).
The change in spigot diameter is responsible for this evolution
5. Conclusion and perspectives
of the behavior. According to Table 4 and Fig. 18, there is almost
twice as much of the largest particles inside the hydrocyclone
CFD simulation offers significant potential for studying and
with the 6 mm diameter spigot than with the 18 mm spigot.
understanding the separation mechanisms that take place inside
Moreover, due to the small underflow diameter and by the com-
a hydrocyclone. This can potentially give practitioners and
paction of particles in the conical part, the flow rate passing
researchers interesting guidelines for improving the performance
through the vortex finder increases and drives out more particles,
of hydrocyclones and possibly improve their design.
irrespective of their diameter. With the 6 mm diameter spigot,
There are many circumstances where hydrocyclone perfor-
mance and dense flow are intertwined, however the effect of dense
regimes inside a hydrocyclone are not understood. This work has
established that CFD modeling can easily provide meaningful
information about the properties of the swirling flow inside a
hydrocyclone where experimental investigations would be utterly
complex.
Comparison between CFD simulation results and measured val-
ues of solids split and separation functions measured on a 100 mm
diameter hydrocyclone permitted conclusion that CFD simulations
are able to predict performance trends, even under extreme roping
conditions.
Through varying feed solids concentration and spigot diame-
ters, a number of distinct operating regimes were produced inside
the hydrocyclone. It was found that solids concentration is more or
less evenly distributed throughout the hydrocyclone. Dense re-
gions can form inside the hydrocyclone, mainly towards the bot-
tom part of the conical section, which dissipate energy through
viscous effects. The swirling flow, with the high tangential veloci-
Fig. 17. Water tangential velocity profile in the cylindrical section of the hydro- ties (G-force) that are the classification driver cannot develop
cyclone, taken 100 mm under the roof.
throughout the entire hydrocyclone body. This can be described
as the hydrocyclone having an apparent, or effective geometry that
differs from the physical one. At the highest solids concentration
tested in this study, the conical section of the hydrocyclone was al-
most entirely filled with a packed bed of particles, so that the
apparent geometry resembled that of a stub cyclone, yielding a
thickening behavior of the hydrocyclone with nearly all the process
water reporting to the overflow.
Overall, this study has established that it is possible to simulate
the behavior of the swirling flow inside hydrocyclone under dense
regimes. Even though it is necessary to continuously improve on
the quality of the physics embedded into the CFD model, it was
found that analysis of simulation results can help understand the
separation trends observed in experiments. A great deal of infor-
mation that is directly relevant to practical operation of hydrocy-
clones can be made from analysis of the flow characteristics
inside the hydrocyclone. It is believed that many important practi-
cal issues such as short-circuiting, the Rf factor or the fish-hook ef-
fect will soon find interesting explanations from analysis of CFD
simulations.
Acknowledgements
References Hsieh, K., Rajamani, R., 1991. Mathematical model of the hydrocyclone based on
physics of fluid flow. AIChE Journal 37.
Kelsall, D., 1952. A study of the motion of solid particles in a hydraulic cyclone.
Batrak, O., Patino, G., Simonin, O., Flour, I., Le Guevel, T., Perez, E., 2005. Unlike
Chemical Engineering Research and Design 30, 87–108.
particles size collision model in 3d unsteady polydispersed simulation of
Launder, B., Reece, G., Rodi, W., 1975. Progress in the development of a reynolds-
circulating fluidised bed. In: 8th International Conference on Circulating
stress turbulence closure. Journal of fluid mechanics 68, 537–566.
Fluidized Bed, Hangzhou, China.
Laviéville, J., Boucker, M., Quemerais, M., Mimouni, S., Mechitoua, N., 2006.
Brennan, M., 2006. CFD simulations of hydrocyclones with an air core comparison
NEPTUNE_CFD V1.0 – Theory Manual. NEPTUNE Report H-I81-2006-04377-EN
between large eddy simulations and a second moment closure. Chemical
– Nept_2004_L1.2/3, EDF R& D.
Engineering Research and Design 84, 495–505.
Laviéville, J., Simonin, O., 1999. Equations et modèles diphasiques du Code Astrid
Chang, Y., Ilea, C., Aasen, Ø., Hoffmann, A., 2011. Particle flow in a hydrocyclone
3.4 et du Code saturne polyphasique. Technical Report HE-44/99/041/A, EDF R&
investigated by positron emission particle tracking. Chemical Engineering
D.
Science.
Nageswararao, K., Wiseman, D., Napier-Munn, T., 2004. Two empirical hydrocyclone
Davailles, A., Climent, E., Bourgeois, F., 2012. Fundamental understanding of
models revisited. Minerals Engineering 17, 671–687.
swirling flow pattern in hydrocyclones. Separation and Purification
Neesse, T., Dueck, J., 2007. Air core formation in the hydrocyclone. Minerals
Technology. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.011.
Engineering 20, 349–354.
Delgadillo, J., Rajamani, R., 2005. A comparative study of three turbulence-closure
Neesse, T., Schneider, M., Golyk, V., Tiefel, H., 2004a. Measuring the operating state
models for the hydrocyclone problem. International journal of mineral
of the hydrocyclone. Minerals Engineering 17, 697–703.
processing 77, 217–230.
Neesse, T., Schneider, M., Golyk, V., Tiefel, H., Dueck, J., Buntenbach, S., 2004b.
Ergun, S., 1952. Fluid flow through packed columns. Chemical Engineering Progress
Hydrocyclone operation at the transition point rope/spray discharge. Minerals
48, 89–94.
Engineering 17, 733–737.
Galassi, M., Coste, P., Morel, C., Moretti, F., 2009. Two-phase flow simulations for PTS
Ozel, A., Fede, P., Simonin, O., 2010. 3D numerical prediction of gas-solid flow
investigation by means of NEPTUNE CFD code. Science and Technology of
behavior in CFB risers for Geldart A and B particles. In: Proceedings of the 20th
Nuclear Installations 2009, 12.
International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion.
Galvin, K., Smitham, J., 1994. Use of X-rays to determine the distribution of particles
Simonin, O., 1996. Continuum Modelling of Dispersed Two-phase Flows
in an operating cyclone. Minerals Engineering 7, 1269–1280.
Combustion and Turbulence in Two-phase Flows (Lecture Series 1996–02).
Gobin, A., Neau, H., Simonin, O., Llinas, J., Reiling, V., Sélo, J., 2003. Fluid dynamic
Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Rhode Saint Genese.
numerical simulation of a gas phase polymerization reactor. International
Slack, M., Prasad, R., Bakker, A., Boysan, F., 2000. Advances in cyclone modelling
Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 43, 1199–1220.
using unstructured grids. Transactions of IChemE 78, 1098–1104.
Gourdel, C., Simonin, O., Brunier, E., 1999. Two-maxwellian equilibrium distribution
Srivastava, A., Sundaresan, S., 2003. Analysis of a frictional-kinetic model for gas-
function for the modelling of a binary mixture of particles. Circulating Fluidized
particle flow. Powder Technology 129, 72–85.
Bed Technology, vol. VI. Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Wen, C., Yu, Y., 1965. Mechanics of Fluidization. In: Chem. Eng. Prog. Symp. Ser., p.
Hsieh, K., 1988. Phenomenological Model of the Hydrocyclone. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of
100.
Metallurgical Engineering, University of Utah.