Understanding The Cost of Structural Steel Works
Understanding The Cost of Structural Steel Works
Introduction
For most projects, the decision on the
choice and form of the frame material
happens early in the design process,
often based on early design principles,
limited information and budget costings.
Once selected, the frame material is
unlikely to change, as this can have
significant programme implications
from the consequential impact on the
design of other major elements, such
as cladding and service installations.
Hence, it is vital to support informed
decision-making with realistic cost
information at this early stage, before
refining during the detailed design
stages.
34
September 2020 | thestructuralengineer.org
ëFIGURE 4:
Open-access site with
minimal constraints
eaves of 6–8m and high eaves of TABLE 2: BCIS location ceiling heights and increase flexibility for ëFIGURE 5:
Breakdown of costs
10–13m. factors (at Q2, 2020) the building fitout, cellular beams may be
of steel frame for
adopted with openings through the web typical multistorey
Cost ranges for two types of single- Location BCIS index for the distribution of services (Figure 6). commercial building
storey industrial building are also City-centre buildings are generally
Central London 128
provided. constructed on existing confined or
Costs are expressed as a cost/ Manchester 99 irregular sites, which influence the building
m2 on GIFA and include allowances Birmingham 96 form, are likely to prevent the use of a
for a concrete core. Indicative cost Liverpool 94
regular column grid and may result in
information is also presented on floor alterations to floor plates on the upper
Leeds 93
types and fire protection. The rates have storeys.
been developed from cost models of the Glasgow 93 In mixed-use schemes, transfer
different building types and for each the Newcastle 92 structures may reduce the wider grids of
average weight of the structural frame Cardiff 95
office or retail areas at lower levels to a
has been given. more rationalised residential grid on upper
Dublin* 97
To use Table 1: floors (Figure 7).
Ò| identify which frame type most Nottingham 104 All these factors contribute to a higher
closely relates to the project under * AECOM index average weight of the steel frame (typically
consideration 75-90kg/m2 including fittings) and, along
Ò| select and add the floor type under with the increased complexity, result in
consideration occupiers as possible. significantly higher structural frame cost
Ò| add fire protection if required. These buildings often need to be ranges than for the simpler, more regular
easily subdivided into smaller units and low-rise buildings.
For example, for a low-rise, short- have large floorplates. They are typically The rate range given in Table 1 is
span building with a composite two to four storeys with a uniform grid generally applicable for buildings up to
metal deck floor and 60 minutes’ fire of 6–9m that provides largely column- about 15 storeys; tall buildings above 15
resistance, the overall frame rate (based free space and relatively high floor-to- storeys start to have fewer comparables
on the average of each range) would be: floor heights of 3.75–4m. in terms of benchmarks and are likely
The lack of complex steel structures to have a much higher proportion of
£113.00 + £78.50 + £17.50 = £209.00 needed to construct the regular grid complex elements, non-standard sections
per m2 GIFA contributes to keeping the average steel and complicated logistics, especially
frame weight down (typically 50–60kg/ when constructed on tight city-centre
The rates should then be adjusted m2 including fittings), but this category sites. The rate range for tall buildings can
íFIGURE 6:
using location indices; Table 2 contains can cover a lot of building types and be 15–20% higher than the top of the Cellular beams to allow
a selection of indices as published and functions. This central assumption standard range. service integration
updated by the BCIS. therefore needs to be reviewed with the
For the example considered above, if design team. Due to the low-rise nature
the project were in Central London then of these buildings, the fire protection
the overall frame rate would be: requirements are not as onerous
as for high-rise developments and
£209.00 × (128/100) = £267.50 per m2 30–60-minute fire protection would be
GIFA considered standard.
36
September 2020 | thestructuralengineer.org
Acknowledgments
The information presented here is based
íFIGURE 9:
Portal frame ‘shed’ on a series of articles commissioned by
with low eaves BCSA, written by Gardiner & Theobald
LLP and more recently by AECOM,
and originally published in Building
magazine.
REFERENCE
HAVE
YOUR
SAY
@IStructE
[email protected] #TheStructuralEngineer
37
thestructuralengineer.org | September 2020