Portfolio Analysis in Share Market
Portfolio Analysis in Share Market
NEPAL
(With Reference to Kumari Bank Ltd., Bank of Kathmandu Ltd. and
Nepal Investment Bank Ltd.)
A Thesis
Submitted BY:
SANITA MUNIKAR
Shanker Dev Campus
Roll No. 2623/064
T.U. Regd. No: 7-1-274-405-2001
Exam Roll No: 392819
To:
Office of the Dean
Faculty of Management
Tribhuvan University
March, 2015
RECOMMENDATION
This is to certify that the Thesis
Submitted by:
Sanita Munikar
Entitled:
Has been prepared as approved by this Department in the prescribed format of the
Faculty of Management. This Thesis is forwarded for examination.
…………………….
Mr. Kiran Thapa
(Thesis Supervisor)
By:
SANITA MUNIKAR
Entitled:
INVESTMENT POLICY OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN
NEPAL
(With Reference to Kumari Bank Ltd., Bank of Kathmandu Ltd. and
Nepal Investment Bank Ltd.)
And found the thesis to be the original work of the student and written according to
the prescribed format. We recommend the thesis to be accepted as partial fulfillment
of the requirement for Master Degree of Business Studies (M.B.S.)
Viva-Voce Committee
I hereby declare that the work reported in this thesis entitled “INVESTMENT
POLICY OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN NEPAL (With Reference to Kumari
Bank Ltd., Bank of Kathmandu Ltd. and Nepal Investment Bank Ltd.)”. Submitted
to Office of the Dean, Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, is my original
work done in the form of partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master’s
Degree in Business Study (M.B.S.) under the supervision of Asso. Prof. Prakash
Singh Pradhan and Mr. Kiran Thapa of Shanker Dev Campus.
SANITA MUNIKAR
Shanker Dev Campus
Roll No. 2623/064
T.U. Regd. No: 7-1-274-405-2001
Exam Roll No: 392819
I would like to extend my gratitude to the respectable teachers for their valuable
suggestions, guidance and support. I would never forget my friends who always
encouraged me and helped me by providing support for the preparation of this
thesis.
I am also grateful to all the Liberian of Shanker Dev campus I would like to express
my respect and, indebtedness to my parents for their continuous support to complete
my study.
I would like to extend thanks to the respondent banks for providing the necessary
data and valuable suggestions on my subjects on my subject matter. I hope this work
could be useful for future research in this field.
Finally, effort has been made to avoid all type of error and mistake, though mistake
can be made by everyone, so I’m sorry for the unknown mistake that I made in this
work.
Sanita Munikar
Recommendation
Viva-Voce Sheet
Declaration
Acknowledgement
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Abbreviations
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDICES
1.1 Background
It is fact that the development of the country depends upon economic growth.
Among the various support of economic growth, the development of banking
method is one of the most important elements. In another words there is no
possibility of economic development without banking activities. That’s why it is the
most powerful weapon of the country. Bank is the resource for the economic
development, which maintains the self-confidence of various segments of society
and extends credit to the people. So, commercial banks are those financial
institutions mainly dealing with activities of the trade, commerce, industry and
agriculture that seek regular financial and other helps from them for growing and
flourishing. The objective of commercial banks is to mobilize idle resources into the
most profitable sector after collecting them from scattered sources.
The concept of the banking has been developed from the ancient history with the
effort of ancient goldsmiths who developed the practice of storing people’s gold and
valuables under such arrangement the depositors would leave their gold for
safekeeping and given a receipt by the goldsmith. Whenever, the receipt was
presented the depositors would get back their gold and valuables after paying a
small amount as fee for safekeeping and serving.
In Nepal, ‘The Tejarath Adda’ may be regarded as the father of modern banking
institution and for a quite a long time it tendered a good service to the government
as well as to the general public. However, the concept of modern banking institution
in Nepal was introduced as the first commercial bank Act 1993 B.S. Before that the
credit needs of the people for commercial and other purpose were met mostly by the
unorganized market of the private moneylenders. The commercial banks, in fact are
expected to run on the commercial principles. They are guided by the specific
motive. Earning of profit is therefore, the primary objectives of these banks. The
history of commercial banks in Nepal starts from the establishment of the Nepal
Property
Bank Ltd. on 1994 B.S.ofIt Shanker Devbank
is the first Campus Library
in Nepal and 13
prior to this, there was no
such organized banking system in the country. It was established under Special
Banking Act 1993 B.S. having elementary functions of a commercial bank. 51% of
the paid up capital of Nepal Bank Ltd. is owned by the government and 49% owned
by the public. Because of the non-existence of a central bank in the country, the
commercial bank had to act as its own central bank and keep enough resources in
had of meeting emergencies.
Later, the Nepal Rastra Bank was established on 2013 B.S. with objectives of
supervising, protecting and directing the functions of commercial banking activities.
As the time passed, the Rastriya Banijya bank was established on 2022 B.S. in order
to play a major role not only in domestic banking services but also in the foreign
trade. After the establishment of this bank, there was progress in the banking
industry in Nepal.
Today, Nepal can take legitimate pride in the remarkable growth and progress in the
banking industry. Nepal has opened its door to foreign commercial banks to operate
in the kingdom almost a decade back. Consequently, Nepal Arab Bank was
established in 2041 B.S. under the commercial bank act of 2031. Similarly, the
Nepal Indosuez Bank was established as a joint venture between Nepal and France
on 2042 and a Nepal Grindlays Bank on 2043. As the country followed economic
liberalization, there was massive entrance of foreign banks in Nepal. The
establishments of Himalayan Bank as a joint venture with Pakistani bank; Nepal
SBI Bank as a joint venture with the reputed bank of India, State Bank of India;
Nepal Bangladesh Bank as a joint venture bank with Bangladeshi bank; Bank of
Kathmandu as a joint venture bank with Thailand bank; Everest bank as the venture
bank with Punjab National bank; Nepal Sri Lanka bank as a joint venture bank with
Sri Lanka bank are the examples of expansion of banking industry Nepal.
The evolution of the organized financial sector in Nepal has a short history
compared to that in other developing South Asian countries. The financial structure
which reflects the relative position of the financial system incomparision to the non-
financial system has a bearing not only on the propensity to save and inducement to
invest but also on the conduct of monetary policy for the financial institution and
instruments serve as the channel of the central bank is conducting monetary policy.
Banking sector plays an important role in the economic development of the country.
It provides an effective payment and credit system which facilitates the channeling
of funds from the surplus (savers) units to the deficit units (investors) in the
economy” (Garhwal, 1993:12).It is intermediary between the deficit and surplus of
financial resources. Financial institution like banks are a necessary to collect
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 15
scattered saving and put them into productive channels. The basic task of financial
institutions is to mobilize the saving of the community and ensure efficient
allocation of the savings to high yielding investment projects to offer attractive and
secured returns to different sectors of the economy according to planned priorities
of the country, on the other hand, this process of financial institutions give rise to
money and other financial assets which therefore have a central place in the
development process of the economy.
Loans are an essential aspect of commercial banking functions. “First, income from
loan contributes substantially to the revenues and profit of the bank. Second,
lending money to people in the community strengthens the community- bank
relationship. Third, lending money spurs business development and supports a
growing economy” (demister, 1980: 82). Credit being the most important function
of commercial banks, affects overall development of the country. So far as pace of
economic development is considered, it is directly related to the quality and quantity
of the credit, which is derived from various financial institutions especially
commercial banks in Nepal. Investment operation of commercial banks is very risky
one. For this, commercial banks have to pay due consideration while formulating
Investment Policy. A healthy development of any commercial band depends upon
its investment policy. A good investment policy attracts both borrowers and lenders,
which helps to increase the volume and quality deposits, and investment.
Considering these facts, this study mainly focuses on the investment policy of joint
venture commercial banks in Nepal.
The authorized capital of NIBL was Rs. 4,000,000,000 in FY 2011/12 and issued
and paid up capital was Rs. 3,012,924,200. NIBL has established a number of
branches to increase the volume of its transactions.
Besides these BOKL, used Radio Modem (RF Link) technology, which helps
centralized database and communication system to do better work by which
Anywhere Banking facility. Radio Modem VSAT with SCPC. Anywhere banking
facility provides deposit and withdrawal facility to the customers, order cheque
books from telephone. And Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) in the New Road
branch. ATM is a machine in which inserting a certain card, the customer is to get
certain amount of money. BOKL management team is also doing the homework to
introduce a credit card. And, BOKL has joined hands with Society for World-wide
Inter-bank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) to speed up the transfer of funds
in different countries all over the world. BOKL is also providing late night easy
service at some of its branches.
Project appraisal method followed by commercial banks is also not scientific one.
So a large volume of credit extended by commercial banks is drifting from basic
credit principle and found to have lower productivity. Loan supervision and follow
as regarding whether clients are properly utilizing the bank investment is found to
be poor in many of the commercial banks. Due to all these reasons, the proportion
of non-performing asset on total loan and advances has been increasing
significantly. It has become a major problem of two large commercial banks, NBL
and RBB, and now private sector joint venture banks are also suffering from the
NPA problem within the short time span of their operation.
Similarly, the investment portfolio position of the banks is not satisfactory. They are
not following a sound diversification principle. Portfolio theory gives the concept of
investment in Property
a very good way that
of Shanker Dev“does notLibrary
Campus put all 20
eggs in a single basket”.
Diversity of funds reduces the risk. One-time commercial banks had invested a large
proportion of their loan to Garment, Hotel and Carpet industries. But now these
sectors became sick and banks are in trouble of their loan repayment.
The directions and guidance provided by Nepal Rastra Bank are the major policy
statements for Nepalese commercial banks. A long term and published policy about
their operation is not found even in the joint venture banks. Even if somehow they
have formulated some procedural guidelines they are failing in proper
implementation due to poor supervision.
Investment policy may differ from one company to another but there in not
optimum utilization of shareholders fund to have greater return in any financial
companies. Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) has also played important role to make these
companies to invest their funds in a good sector. For this purpose NRB has imposed
many rules and regulations so that they can have sufficient liquidity and security.
Thus, in this scenario of Nepalese commercial banking sector, this study mainly
seeks the answers of the following specific problems related to investment policy of
Listed Banks.
1 What is the proportion of Non-Performing Asset on total loans and
advances of the bank?
2 What is the portfolio behavior of the bank?
3 Is the bank’s funds mobilization and investment policy effective and
efficient?
4 Do the earnings of the bank is affected by the investment policy?
5 Is there any stability in fund mobilization policy or not?
6 What is the relationship of investment and loans and advances with total
deposit and net profit?
The income and profit of the bank depend upon the lending procedure applied by
the bank as well as the lending policy and investments in different securities also
affect the income and profit. In the investment procedures and policies it is always
taken in mind that “A sound lending and investment policy is not only pre-requisite
for bank’s profitability but also crucially significant for the promotion of
commercial saving of a developing country like Nepal”. The sound policies help
commercial banks maximize quality and quantity of investment and thereby,
achieve the own objective of profit maximization and social welfare. Formulation of
sound investment policies and coordinated and planned efforts pushes forward the
forces of economic growth.
James B. Bexley, (1987) express his views as, “Investment policy fixes
responsibilities for the investment disposition of the bank's assets in terms of
allocating funds for investment and loan, and establishing responsibility for day to
day management of those assets.”
Reed et al. (1980: 195) added that “The rate of return on assets is a valuable
measure when comparing the profitability of one bank with another or with the
commercial banking system. A low rate might be the result of conservative lending
and investment policies or excessive operating expenses. Banks could, of course,
attempt to offset this by adopting more aggressive lending and investment policies
to generate more income.”
Investment policies include credit analysis and its principal purpose is to determine
the ability and willingness of a borrower to repay a requested loan in accordance
with the terms of the loan contract. Factors considered in credit analysis are capacity
to borrow, characters (honesty, integrity, industry, morality, ability to create
income, ownership of assets economic conditions, etc. Loans are the most important
assets held by banks and bank lending provides the bulk of bank income (Reed et al,
1980: 203, 235).
In broad sense the investment operation of bank includes lending and investing in
different types of securities. We can say lending is the primary investment activity
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 27
and investment in different types of securities is the secondary investment activity
of the commercial banks.
Reed et al. (1980: 242) further stressed that “More and more banks have developed
formal, written lending policies in recent years. They provide guidance for lending
officers and there by establish a greater degree of uniformity in lending practices.
Since lending is important both to the bank and to the community it serves, loan
policies must be worked out carefully after considering many factors like:
• Capital position.
• Risk and profitability of various types of loans.
• Stability of deposits.
• Economic conditions.
• Influence of monetary and fiscal policy.
• Ability and experience of bank personnel.
• Credit needs of the area served.”
Though Nepal had rudimentary forms of banking as early as Seventh century, the
history of modern banks in Nepal began only after when the first organized and
modern bank - Nepal Bank Ltd. established in 1937 as a semi-government
organization with an authorized capital, issued capital and paid up capital of Rs. 1
crore, Rs. 25 lacs and Rs. 8.45 lacs respectively. Before that unorganized money
market was the only source of financing for investors in Nepal. Lack of economic
development programmers in those days confined the services of Nepal Bank Ltd.,
in accepting deposits from the public and financing them trade transactions. Later,
the Nepal Rastra Bank was established in 1955 which has helped to make banking
system more systematic and dynamic during that time. As the time passed, the
Rastriya Banijya Bank established in 1966 in order to play a major role not only in
domestic banking but also in the foreign trade.
ii. Advancing of Loans: The various types of loans and advances are as follows:
• Cash Credit It is running loan account, normally granted against stock and
receivables and
Property of is regulated
Shanker DevbyCampus
stock statements and drawing power
Library 31
wherein Credit/Debit transactions are permitted within the sanctioned
limit. The level to which debit balance can be permitted is decided by
Drawing Power or Limit whichever is lower. Cash credit is always
granted against security of certain commodities, products or book
debts/receivables.
Overdraft- The bank allows its respectable and reliable customers to overdraw their
accounts through cheques. The customers, however, pays interest to the bank on the
amount overdrawn by them. An overdraft in granted against security of certain
investments like Bonds/Fixed Deposits or is given without any security.
iv. Purchase and sale of Foreign Exchange: The bank also carries on the business of
buying and selling foreign currencies. Generally, exchange of foreign currencies in
developed countries is done by Exchange Bank but due to lack of exchange banks in
our country this function is done by commercial banks.
vi. General Utility Services: Apart from agency services, the bank also renders some
useful services known as general utility services. They can be explained as follows:
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 33
(a) Safekeeping of Valuables: During the middle ages, banks began the practice of
holding gold, securities and other valuables owned by their customers in secure
vaults. A modern bank also receives from its customers, valuables such as
securities, jewelry, documents of title to goods, etc. for safe custody. The bank acts
as the custodian of the valuables belonging to the customers. The bank receives
them and returns back when demanded.
(b) Giving information about its customers: Since the bank is closely acquainted
with its customers, it can pass on reliable information in respect of their
creditworthiness to their parties at other places.
(c) Assist in Foreign Trade: The bank assists the traders engaged in foreign trade of
the country. It discounts the bills of exchange drawn by Nepalese exporters on the
foreign importers and enables the exporters to receive money in the home currency.
Similarly it also accepts the bills drawn by the foreign exporters.
(d) Making venture capital loans: Increasingly, banks have become active in
financing the start-up costs of new companies, particularly in high-tech industries.
Because of the added risk involved in such loans, this is generally through a venture
capital firm that is a subsidiary of a bank holding company, and other investors are
often brought in to share the risk.
(e) Financial Advising: Bankers have long been asked for financial advice by their
customers, particularly when it comes to the use of credit and the saving or
investing of funds. Many banks offer a wide range of financial advisory services,
from helping financial planning to consulting to business managers and checking on
the credit standing of firms.
(f) Automated Teller Machine (ATM): Nowadays, banks allow customers to deposit
and draw money from their accounts through Automated Teller Machine.
(g) Anywhere Branch Banking Service (ABBS): Banks offer account holder of a
branch to avail some banking services from other branches, which is called
Anywhere Branch Banking Service.
(h) Tele-banking: Customers may acquire information like, account balance,
exchange rate and may instruct banks to do various jobs over the phone/fax.
(i) Credit/Debit Card: Banks issue credit cards to highly creditworthy customers.
Banks also issue debit cards as well. This relieves the customers from carrying cash.
Beside these functions, a commercial bank also finance internal and foreign trade,
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 34
collects statistics about money, banking, trade and commerce, and underwrite shares
and debentures issued by private companies, offer some of the banking services at
the door of highly valued customers. It also guarantees to other parties on behalf of
its customers to make payment up to a specified sum of money to the beneficiary on
demand in case of default by its customer. Further, a commercial bank also
facilitates the trading between two parties who live in different countries through
letters of credit and guarantees the seller of payment in case the buyer defaults to
pay.
I) Safety and Security: The bank should never invest its funds in those securities,
which are too volatile i.e., which are subject to too much depreciation and
fluctuations because a little difference may cause a great loss. It must not invest its
funds into speculative businessman who may be bankrupt at once and who may earn
millions in a minute also. Security means adequate collateral having good value,
which can be easily sold off if required at any point of time. The bank should accept
that type of securities, which are commercial, durable and marketable having fair
market value. For this purpose ‘MAST’ should be applied while reaching and
investment decision, where MAST stands for,
M= Marketability,
A= Ascertainability,
S= Stability,
T= Transferability.
(II) Profitability: A commercial bank can maximize its volume of wealth through
maximization of return on their investments lending. So, they must invest their
funds where they can gain maximum profit. The profit of commercial banks
depends on the interest rate, volume of loan, its time period and nature of
investment in different securities.
(III) Liquidity: Liquidity is the ability of a firm to satisfy its short-term obligations
when they become due for payment. People deposit money at the bank in different
account with confidence that the bank will repay their money when they need. To
maintain such confidence of the depositors, the bank must keep this point in mind
while investing its excess funds in different securities, so that it can meet current or
short-term obligations when they become due for payment.
(IV) Purpose of loan: From the viewpoint of security, a banker should always be
known that why a customer is in the need of loan. If a borrower misuses the loan
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 36
granted by the bank, it can never repay and bank will possess heavy bad debts.
Therefore in order to avoid this situation each and every bank should demand and
examine all the essential detailed information about the scheme of the project or
activities, before lending.
(V) Diversification: “A bank should not lay all its eggs on the same basket”. This
saying is very important to the bank and it should always be careful not to grant
loan in only one sector. To minimize risk, a bank must diversify its investment on
different sectors. Diversification of loan helps to sustain loss according to the law of
average because if securities of a company deprived, there may be appreciation in
the securities of other companies. In this way the loss can be minimized or
recovered.
(VI) Tangibility: Though it may be considered that tangible property does not yield
an income apart from direct satisfaction of possession of property, many times.
Intangible securities have lost their value due to price level inflation. A commercial
bank should prefer tangible security to intangible one.
(VII) Legality: Illegal securities will bring out many problems for the investor. A
commercial bank must follow the rules and regulations as well as different
directives issued by the central bank (Nepal Rastra Bank), Ministry of finance,
Ministry of law and other relevant authorities, while mobilizing its funds.
(VIII) National Interest: In addition to its own profitability, the Bank should also
consider the national interest. Even though the Bank cannot get maximum return
from such investment, it should carry out its obligation towards the society and the
country. The Bank is required to invest on such sectors as per the Government and
Nepal Rastra Bank’s instruction. Investment on government bonds, priority and
deprived sector lending are the examples of such investments.
Prabhakar Ghimire (2009) has published an article in which he has mentioned that
most of the commercial banks of Nepal are ready to pay the penalty in spite of
investing on rural, priority sector, poverty stricken and deprived areas. In the
directives of Nepal Rastra Bank it is clearly mentioned and directed that all the
commercial banks (under NRB) should invest 12% of its total investments to the
priority sectors. Out of this 12%, they should invest 3% to the lower class of
countrymen. However, these commercial banks are unable to meet the requirements
of NRB.
Dr. Sunity Shrestha (2010) in her article, “Investment policy of commercial banks of
Nepal and its impact on GDP”, has presented with the objectives to make an
analysis of contribution of commercial bank’s lending to the gross domestic product
(GDP) of Nepal. She has set hypotheses that there has been positive impact of
lending of commercial banks to the GDP. In research methodology she has
considered GDP as the dependent variable and various sectors of lending viz,
agriculture, industrial, commercial, service and general and social sectors as the
independent variables. A multiple regression technique has been applied to analyze
the contribution. The multiple regression analysis has shown that all the variables
except service sector lending have positive impact on GDP. Thus, in conclusion she
has accepted the hypothesis i.e.; there has been positive impact on GDP. She has
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 38
accepted that there has been positive impact by the lending of commercial banks in
various sectors of economy, except service sector investment.
Prof. Amrit Man Shrestha (2011) in his article “Nepalma Banijya Bank Haruko
Bhumika” has pointed out some important activities and its present scenario. In his
words these activities are to be studied and revised as soon as possible, otherwise
these may be disaster for the sound and effective banking system. The article is
written in Nepali language. Some of the main points of his article are given as:
Possibility of capital flight: - In Nepalese perspective, capital flight became a major
problem. Whatever capitals were constructed in Rana Regime, were already flowed
outside the country. Due to the mis-implementation of “Bhumi Sudhar” most of the
constructed capital was also flowed away outside the country. Due to the unstable
political situation, the possibilities of capital flight seem to be developed in high
scale.
Sekhar Bahadur Pradhan (2012) “Deposits mobilization, its problem and prospects”
has presented a short glimpse on investment in different sectors, its problem and
prospects, through his article.. On his article, he has expressed that, “Deposit is the
life blood of any financial institution, be it commercial bank, finance company,
cooperative or non-government organization”. He also added, in consideration of 10
commercial banks and nearly 3 dozens of finance companies, the latest figure does
produce a strong feeling that a serious review must be made of problems and
prospects of deposit sector. Except few joint venture banks, other organizations rely
heavily on the business deposit receiving and credit disbursement.
Bhisma Raj Dhungana (2014) has presented an article about “NPL and its
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 39
management”. According to him, extension of credit is one of the major activities of
banks and financial institution. Credit usually represents the bulk of the institution’s
earning assets. Interest on credits is major source of income and profitability for the
banks and financial institution. Therefore, quality credit management is a subject of
crucial importance in the bank and financial institutions to maintain sustaiKBLity
and improving operational efficiency. Poor credit management and deterioration in
the quality of loans give birth to NPLs. The internal measures play significant role
to control the growth of NPLs. Best credit practices, culture and policies are
required to strengthen the internal factors. The bank should have a proper system
and competency on risk management and should insure that the risk are accurately
identified, assessed and controlled properly. A proper risk management is
undoubtedly an important tool for a good banking and NPL’s management.The
problem of non-performing loan has been the major issue on baking sector reforms
agenda. Nepal Rastra Bank is very much concerned with this issue and initiating
various measures to enhance the risk management capacities, introducing policies
and issuing regulations in this regard. However, the level of NPLs in the banking
system is decreasing with the implementation of comprehensive financial sector
reform program, but it is still at astounding level at rounding level at around 18% at
mid July 2005. The level of NPL in the financial system of Nepal comprising of 17
commercial banks, 25 development banks, 9 micro credit development banks and 16
finance companies is around 17% (NPR 29.0 billion) as at July 2005. Unless and
until the problem of NPL is resolved, the growth and stability of the financial
system cannot be assured. Therefore, the problem should be resolved as soon as
possible.
Thapa (2009) has expressed his view that the commercial banks including foreign
joint venture banks seem to be doing pretty well in mobilizing deposits. Likewise,
loans and advances of these banks are also increasing. But compared to the high
credit needs particularly by the newly emerging industries, the banks still seem to
lack adequate funds. The banks are increasing their lending to nontraditional sectors
along with the Property
traditionalofsectors.
Shanker Dev Campus Library 41
The Main Objective
• On the other hand, the foreign venture banks have been functioning in an
extremely efficient way.
• They are making huge profit year after year and have been distributing large
amount of loans and dividends to its employees and shareholders.
• Similarly, concentration of these banks to modern off-balance sheet activities
and efficient personnel management has added to the maximization of their
profits.
3.6.3 Percentage
Percentage is one of the most useful tools for the comparison of two quantities or
variables. Simply, the word percentage means per hundred. In other words, the
fraction with 100 as its denominator is known as a percentage and the numerator of
this fraction is known as rate of percent.
R=
∑ xy
x2 y 2
Where,
X=X- X and Y = Y- Y
This chapter implies the presentation and analysis of data collected from various
secondary sources. The chapter has been divided into two main sections. The first
section of the chapter includes the presentation and analysis of data while the second
section includes major findings of the study.
Liquidity Ratio
Commercial Banks must maintain its satisfactory liquidity position to satisfy the
credit needs of the commercial to meet demands for deposits, withdrawals, pay
nation by obligation in time and convert non-cash assets into cash to fulfill
immediate needs without loss of bank and consequent impact on long run profit.
Current Ratio
It is the relationship of current assets and current liabilities. Current assets can be
converted in to cash with in short period of time normally not exceeding one year.
Current liabilities are those obligation which are payable within short period.
Current assets consist of cash and bank balance, money at call or short terms notice,
loan & advances, investment in government securities and other interest receivable
and other miscellaneous current assets. Current liabilities consist of deposits, loan
and advances, bills payable. Tax provision, staff bonus, dividend payable and
miscellaneous current liabilities.
Figure 4.1
Current Ratio (Times)
In the Table and Figure 4.1 current ratio of commercial banks are analyzed. The
table reflects that the current assets of all commercial banks have exceeded the
current liabilities during the five years period. In general it can be said that all the
banks have sound ability to meet their short term obligations in other words bank is
capable of discharging the current obligations. In case of NIBL, the current ratios
are in increasing trend from fiscal year 2008/09 to 2009/010 but it has slightly
decreased in the year 2010/011 by 0.01. KBL has also increasing trend from fiscal
year 2008/09 to 2012/013. Similarly BOK has a fluctuating trend ratio. In an
average, KBL has maintained lower current ratio, which states that liquidity position
of KBL is fair. The value of coefficient of variation of NIBL is 40.33% which is
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 53
comparatively lower than KBL and greater than BOK i.e. 40.33% < 38.02% >
5.94%. Thus it can be said that current ratio of NIBL is less consistence than BOK
and is slightly consistence than KBL.
Table 4.2
Cash and Bank Balance to Total Deposit Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mea S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) n %
NIBL 12.6
18.25 11.03 17.02 7.84 10.39 11.25 3 3.7256 29.50
KBL 5.13 6.78 8.51 6.87 3.83 3.26 5.73 1.8349 32.02
BOK 11.3
19.68 11.95 11.23 10.11 8.28 6.95 7 4.0842 35.93
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.2
Cash and Bank Balance to Total Deposit Ratio
The Table 4.2 shows cash and bank balance to total deposit ratio of NIBL. KBL and
BOK from the FY 2007/08 to 2012/013.
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 54
The Table and Figure 4.2 show the percentage of cash and bank balance to total
deposit ratio position of NIBL, KBL and BOK. The mean standard deviation and
coefficient of variation of cash and bank balance to total deposit ratios of all banks
are better. The above table reflects NIBL has fluctuating trend likewise 18.25%,
11.03%, 17.02%, 7.84%, 10.39% and 11.25% from the FY 2000/01 to 2012/013
respectively. It has maintained highest ratio in the FY 2000/01 i.e. 18.25% and
lowest ratio in the FY 2011/012 i.e. 7.84%. Similarly KBL and BOK have
maintained fluctuating trend from the FY 2000/01 to 2012/013. In average NIBL has
higher cash and bank balance to total deposits ratio than BOK and KBL. It states
that the liquidity position of NIBL is better in this regard. The above analysis helps
to conclude that, the cash and bank balance position of KBL with respect to deposits
is not better against the readiness to serve its customers deposits than that of the
NIBL. So KBL may invest in more productive sectors like short-term marketable
securities, treasury bills etc ensuring enough liquidity which will helps the bank to
improve its profitability.
The Table 4.3 shows the Cash and bank balance to current asset ratio of NIBL, KBL
and BOK from the FY 2007/08 to 2012/013.
In the Table and Figure 4.3 shows the mean standard deviation and coefficient of
variance of cash and bank balance to current asset ratio of all three banks are in
fluctuating trend during the study period. They show the ability to manage the
deposit with drawls from the customers. NIBL has maintained a highest ratio of
16.53% in the year 2000/01. Similarly KBL and BOK have a highest ratio of 8.25%
and 17.96% in the year 2009/010 and 2000/01 respectively. The mean value of
NIBL is highest in comparisons to other banks. Similarly the coefficient of variation
of NIBL is 28.27%, which is higher than KBL and lower than BOK, it reflects that
the current ratio is less heterogeneous than KBL bank.
Table 4.4
Investment on Government Securities to Current Assets Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 16.30 24.20 20.41 26.24 20.29 29.15 22.77 4.2499 18.67
KBL 20.76 30.95 25.88 25.78 16.12 16.61 22.68 5.3511 23.59
BOK 4.80 8.76 20.91 25.33 23.06 29.81 18.78 8.9746 47.79
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
The Table and Figure 4.4 reflects that investment in government securities to
current asset ratio of NIBL is fluctuating trend, where as BOK in increasing trend
and KBL is in decreasing trend. The mean ratio of NIBL is lesser than KBL and
higher than BOK. It means that NIBL has invest it’s as much as portion of its
current assets as government securities as that of BOK and less than of KBL. The
coefficient of variation of NIBL is lower in comparison to the other banks. Lastly it
can be conclude that it has invested it's more of portion assets as government
securities than other banks and investment made is consistence of coefficient of
variation reveals. But its liquidity portion is slightly poor than other banks ion view
point of investment on government securities.
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 59.52 62.09 62.63 62.60 73.60 85.99 67.74 9.3043 13.74
KBL 58.75 55.87 55.93 57.50 70.71 93.25 65.34 13.4841 20.64
BOK 65.92 74.51 62.88 60.30 63.51 81.39 68.09 7.4344 10.92
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.5
Loan and Advances to Current Assets Ratio
The Table and Figure 4.5 show the percentage of loan and advances ratio to current
assets ratio position of NIBL, BOK and KBL. The loan and advances to current
assets ratio of all banks are in increasing trend. The mean ratio of NIBL is slightly
less than BOK and higher than KBL. It reflects that loan and advances to current
asset ratios of the NIBL has maintained a highest ratio of 85.99% in the FY
2012/013. Similarly KBL and BOK have in 93.25% and 81.39% in the FY
2012/013.The coefficient of variation among ratio is lower in case of NIBL, which
indicates uniformity of NIBL in comparison to other banks. So it can conclude that
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 59
it is better to mobilize its funds as loan and advances. On the other hand satisfactory
than that of other banks from the view point of mean ratios.
Table 4.6
Loan and Advances to Total Deposit Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 65.71 72.23 73.32 72.97 75.45 71.01 71.78 3.0248 4.21
KBL 48.82 47.97 57.68 58.01 72.57 66.79 58.64 8.8701 15.13
BOK 72.23 80.61 73.62 72.94 66.12 69.23 72.46 4.4475 6.14
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
The ratio of NIBL and KBL have in increasing trend where as BOK ratio is in
decreasing trend for 2000/01 to 2011/012. In the case of NIBL has maintained
higher loan and advances to total deposit i.e. 75.45% in a year 2012/013, likewise
KBL has maintained higher ratio in a year 2011/012 and BOK is in 80.61% in a year
2008/09 respectively. The mean value of NIBL i.e. 71.78 is less than BOK and
higher than KBL i.e. 58.64. The CV of NIBL is lower than that of the other banks
which indicate that loan and advances of it is stable and consistent. Lastly it can be
concluded that NIBL is in strong position or in better position regarding the
mobilization of total deposits on loan and advances and acquiring higher profit in
comparison with BOK and lower than KBL. Higher ratio is not good from the view
point of liquidity as the loan and advances are not a liquid as cash and bank balance.
Figure 4.7
Correlation between Deposit and Loan and Advances
The Table and Figure 4.7 show the value of ‘r’, r2, P. Er, 6P. Er between deposit and
loan and advances of NIBL with comparison to BOK and KBL from the 2000/01 to
2012/013. In case of NIBL, it is found that coefficient of correlation between deposit
and loan and advances is 0.996406. It shows the positive relationship between two
variables. The value of coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.992825, which means
99.28% of the variation in the dependent variable (loans and advances), has been
explained by the independent variable (deposit). Similarly, considering the value of
‘r’ i.e. 0.996406 and comparing it with 6 P.Er i.e. 0.011854, we can find, it is greater
than the value of 6P.Er which reveals the value of ‘r’ is significant. Or there is
significant relationship between deposit and loan and advances.
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 62
In the case of KBL and BOK, have positive correlation between deposit and loan
and advances when we consider the value of coefficient of determination (r2) it
indicated than KBL and BOK are 54.16% and 96.27% respectively of the variation
in the dependent variable has been explained by the independent variable. Since the
value r2 of KBL is less than 6P.Er, so its value of r is not significant i.e. there is no
significant relationship between deposit and loan and advances.
After analyzing, the conclusion can be drawn that in NIBL and BKO there is
significant relationship between deposit and loan and advances because ‘r’ is greater
than 6P.Er whereas, in case of KBL ‘r’ is less than 6P.Er. So there is no significant
relationship between deposit and loan and advances. This indicates that NIBL has
higher correlation between deposit and loan and advances as well as higher value of
(r2) than KBL and BOK. It can conclude that it is successful to grant loan and
advances to mobilize the collected deposits in a proper way.
Table 4.8
Total Investment and Total Deposit Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 19.71 30.97 24.70 31.45 21.08 30.43 26.39 4.8058 18.21
KBL 48.64 52.88 44.85 41.33 29.25 31.93 41.48 8.4988 20.49
BOK 7.35 11.66 29.43 32.00 29.05 32.22 23.62 10.1257 42.87
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
From the Table and Figure 4.8, it is found that, total investment to total deposit ratio
all three banks are in increasing and decreasing trend or in fluctuating trend during
study period 2000/01 to 2012/013. The total investment to total deposit ratio of
NIBL has highest ratio of 30.97% in FY 2008/09 and lowest ratio 19.71% in FY
2000/01. Similarly KBL has highest and lowest ratio of 52.88% and 29.25% in FY
2008/09 and 2011/012. BOK has highest and lowest ratio of 32.22% and 7.355 in
FY 2012/013 and 2000/01 respectively.
In comparison with mean value, NIBL has lesser than KBL mean value and higher
than that a BOK i.e. 26.39 < 41.48 > 23.62. Likewise the value of coefficient of
variation on NIBL is lower than that of both banks. After analysis it is clear that the
investment policy of NIBL is in better position in comparisons to both banks. The
total investment to total deposits ratio of NIBL is more homogeneous because it has
low coefficient of variation.
Table 4.9
Coefficient of Correlation Deposit and Total Investment
Banks Evaluation criterions
R r2 P.Er 6P.Er
NIBL 0.935074 0.87436424 0.03459 0.207573
KBL 0.208485 0.04346604 0.263395 1.580367
BOK 0.925525 0.856596 0.039488 0.236929
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.9
Coefficient of Correlation Deposit and Total Investment
The Table and Figure 4.9 shows the value of ‘r’, r2, P.Er, 6P.Er between deposit and
total investment of NIBL with comparison of BOK and KBL. From table, it is found
that coefficient of correlation between deposit and total investment of NIBL is
0.935074. It shows the positive relationship between two variables i.e. deposit,
independent (X) and total investment, dependent (Y). Moreover, when we consider
the value of coefficient of determination (r2) it is 0.87436424 and it means 87.43%
of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variable.
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 65
Similarly considering the value of ‘r’ and comparing with 6 P.Er, it is lesser than
6P.Er, which reveals that the value is not significant. Likewise in the case of KBL
value of ‘r’ is less than 6P.Er so we can say that there is also not significant
relationship between total deposit and total investment.
On the other hand, in case of BOK has positive correlation between deposit and total
investment. By considering the probable error since the value of ‘r’ i.e. 0.925525 is
more than 6P.Er i.e. 0.236929, so it indicates that there is significant relationship
between total deposits and total investment. Likewise by the application of
coefficient determination i.e. r2 which indicates BOK to be 85.65 of the variation in
the dependent variable has been explained by the independent variables.
The above analysis clears that in case of NIBL there is not significant relation
between total deposit and total investment because ‘r’ is less than 6P.Er. That means
NIBL has not able to follow the policy of maximizing the investment of their
deposits. It has not certain investment policy to invest their deposit where their as
BOK there is significant relationship between deposit and total investment. Lastly
we can say that BOK has followed the policy of maximizing the investment of their
deposits or BOK is successful in maximizing the investment of their deposit.
Figure 4.10
Loan and Advances to Working Fund Ratio
This Table and Figure 4.10 show that loan and advances to working fund ratio of
NIBL and KBL is an increasing trend. BOK is in decreasing trend during the study
period. NIBL has the highest ratio 61.41% in the FY 2012/013, KBL and BOK has
the highest ratio i.e. 61.60% and 66.54% in the FY 2011/012 and 2007/08.The mean
value of NIBL has maintained average loan and advances to total working fund ratio
than that of KBL and BOK. This regard, NIBL is in better position among other
banks. The coefficient of variation of NIBL is lower than that of both banks i.e.
3.38% < 14.25% > 7.78% respectively, which clear that loan and advances to total
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 67
working fund ratio is less variable than other banks.
4.2.6 Investment on Government Securities to Total Working Funds Ratio.
The commercial banks should never use all the total deposits resources as loan and
advances and other credit from security and liquidity point of view. So to some
extent commercial bank seem to be interested to utilize their resources by
purchasing government securities. This ratio reflects the relationship between the
banks investment securities in comparison to the total working funds.
The Table 4.11 shows the investment on government securities to total working fund
ratio of NIBL, KBL and BOK.
Table 4.11
Investment on Government Securities to Total Working Fund Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 158.19 23.26 19.86 25.67 17.81 20.82 20.54 3.2657 15.90
KBL 15.38 23.51 21.67 21.93 14.05 10.31 17.81 4.8418 27.19
BOK 4.85 8.54 20.29 24.98 21.78 21.65 17.02 7.5074 44.12
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.11
Investment on Government Securities to Total Working Fund Ratio
Table 4.12
Investment on Shares and Debentures to Total Working Fund Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 0.07 0.26 0.21 0.18 0.16 0.12 0.17 0.0610 36.61
KBL 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.12 0.13 0.0153 11.75
BOK 0.40 0.60 0.31 0.24 0.23 0.19 0.33 0.1390 42.33
(Source: Annual Report of Bank )
The Table and Figure 4.12 depict that NIBL has on decreasing trend in the FY
2009/010 to 2012/013. KBL has maintain same position up to 2010/011 then it has
increasing trend in 2011/012 i.e. 0.13%, 0.13%, 0.13%, 0.16%. Similarly BOK has
also in decreasing trend to investment on shares and debenture to working fund
ratio. In an average, NIBL has maintained medium investment on shares and
debentures to total working fund ratio than other. The coefficient of variation of
NIBL is higher than that of other two banks which indicate that NIBL is more
variable and less consistent.
4.2.8 Total off Balance Sheet Operation to Loan and Advances Ratio
This ratio shows the proportion of free based off balance sheet activities are very
much dependent on made operation management strategy banking net work with
foreign banks etc. Commercial banks should not concentrate only on fund based
activities such as loan and advances, investment on different sectors and so on. It
should pay its attention to increase free based off balance activities. Income
generated through the fee based off balance sheet activities constitutes a significant
proportion in the total income of most of the commercial banks statement. A high
ratio indicates the highest OBS transaction or vice versa.
Figure 4.13
Total OBS Operation to Loan and Advances Ratio
In the Figure and Table 4.13 show the total OBS operation to loan and advances
ratio of NIBL is in decreasing trend in FY 2008/09 and stepped up again in FY
2009/010 from 23.80%, to 47.21%, then again decrease. Similarly KBL and BOK
have maintained the maximum ratio of 70.81% and 50.76% in the FY 2009/010 and
2000/01 respectively.
The mean if NIBL is lower than that of other banks i.e.33.022 < 61.73 > 38.26,
which indicates that, NIBL has lowest OBS transaction or vice versa. Has highest
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 71
mean ratio than NIBL and BOK. The coefficient of variance of NIBL is lower than
that of other banks, which indicated that it is giving attention to increase free based
off balance activities.
Table 4.14
Loan Loss Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 1.11 0.88 0.93 1.39 1.17 0.72 1.03 0.2176 21.06
KBL 2.14 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.37 0.7917 213.97
BOK 1.53 2.76 1.82 1.79 2.27 1.08 1.88 0.5324 28.39
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
The above Table and Figure 4.14 reflects that NIBL has fluctuating trend, it has the
maximum ratio of 1.39% in the FY 2010/011 and minimum ratio of 0.72% in the FY
2012/013. Similarly, in case of KBL it has made any provision in the FY 2008/09
and 2009/010. It has also followed the fluctuating trend. Likewise in the case of
BOK, it has followed the fluctuating trend. It has the maximum ratio of 2.76%,
which is highest ratio among three banks.
The mean value of NIBL is average, which indicated that its position is better in this
regard. It has managed its loan and advances and makes effort for timely recovery of
loan. Similarly, the coefficient of variance of NIBL is lower than that of BOK and
highest than KBL. In average, NIBL has no highest loan loss ratio in comparing
with two other banks. So it shows that its performance in terms of recovery of loan
is satisfactory in comparison to KBL and BOK.
Table 4.15
Return on Loan and Advances Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 2.32 2.16 1.92 2.44 2.24 2.42 2.25 0.1765 7.85
KBL 3.77 3.65 5.37 5.56 4.90 4.92 4.70 0.7353 15.66
BOK 1.58 0.20 1.81 2.26 2.36 2.79 1.83 0.8274 45.13
(Source: Annual Report of Bank )
Figure 4.15
Return on Loan and Advances Ratio
The Table and Figure 4.15 reveals that NIBL return on loan and advances ratio
has decreasing trend in the beginning years and after 2010/011 it is increase from
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 74
1.92% to 2.44% to 2.24% and 2.42% in 2012/013. KBL has maintained
fluctuating trend where BOK has also decreasing trend in the first two years and
after 2010/011 it able to upgrade it net profit.
The mean of NIBL is lesser than KBL and higher than that of BOK i.e. 2.25 < 4.70
> 1.83 respectively. The standard deviation of NIBL is lesser than both banks.
Similarly the coefficient of variation of NIBL is less than other two banks i.e. 7.85%
< 15.66% < 45.13%. KBL has maintained average C.V. and BOK are in highest C.V
value. Thus it can be concluded that NIBL is in average position in earning loan and
advances in comparison to KBL and BOK.
The Table below shows the return on assets of NIBL, KBL and BOK.
Table 4.16
Return on Total Working Fund Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 1.34 1.29 1.17 1.49 1.45 1.49 1.37 0.1172 8.55
KBL 1.64 1.55 2.51 2.72 3.02 2.85 2.38 0.5773 24.24
BOK 1.05 0.15 1.10 1.34 1.42 1.65 1.12 0.4771 42.66
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
The above Table and Figure 4.16 reflect the mean, S.D and C.V of NIBL, KBL,
BOK banks from FY 2000/01 to 2012/013. NIBL has the fluctuating trend which
indicates that its profitability ratio is not consistent. It has highest profit ratio is
1.49% in the FY 2010/011 and 2012/013 and minimum profit ratio is 1.17% in the
FY 2009/010. Similarly KBL and BOK has maintained increasing trend of profit
ratio. In average, NIBL, KBL, BOK banks have able to maintain a net profit during
the stuffy period.
If the mean values are observed NIBL is slightly higher than BOK and lower than
KBL i.e. 1.37 < 2.38 > 1.12 respectively. The coefficient of variation of NIBL is
lesser than that of KBL and BOK i.e. 8.56% < 24.24% < 42.66% it indicate, the
return on total working fund ratio of NIBL is stable and consistent in comparison to
KBL and BOK. The analysis clear the profitability ratio with respect to financial
resources investment of NIBL is better as well as stable.
Figure 4.17
Total Interest Earned to Total outside Assets Ratio
The comparison of mean ratios of NIBL with other two banks reveal that total
interest earned to total outside assets ratio of NIBL is lowest, which indicate that it
has not able to use its fund (outside assets) to earn high interest income in
comparison to other banks.
The total interest earned to total outside assets ratio of KBL and BOK has
fluctuating trend. In case of KBL it increase at FY 2000/01 i.e. 8.21% and decrease
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 77
in the year 2009/010 i.e. 7.14%. Similarly BOK has decrease from 10.23% to
6.75%. If the coefficient of variation is observed KBL has the lowest of all banks i.e.
5.78% < 12.88% < 15.60% respectively. This reflects that earned to total outside
assets of NIBL is consistent. In other words it is satisfactory in compared to other
banks. So it can conclude that NIBL has better position with respect to the income
earned from the total outside assets.
Table 4.18
Total Interest Earned to Total Working Fund Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 7.40 6.71 6.46 6.84 6.10 5.66 6.53 0.5526 8.46
KBL 7.13 6.39 6.15 5.98 6.22 5.87 6.29 0.4108 6.53
BOK 7.50 7.45 6.67 5.97 6.16 5.85 6.60 0.6696 10.15
(Source: Annual Report of Bank )
The Table and Figure 4.18 reveals that the ratio of NIBL is in decreasing trend,
where the ratio of KBL is decreasing at the first three years and increases in the fifth
year i.e. 7.13% > 6.39% > 6.15% > 5.98% < 6.22% > 5.87% respectively. The
BOK has maximum ratio is 7.50% in the FY 2000/01 and minimum ratio is 5.85%
in the FY 2012/013. On the other hand the mean value of NIBL has average of other
two banks. It has the mean of 6.53 which is higher than KBL i.e. 6.29 and less than
BOK i.e. 6.60. Similarly the coefficient of variation of NIBL is 8.46% which is also
more than KBL and less than BOK.
After analysis it can be concluded that total interest earned to total working fund of
NIBL is satisfactory in compared to other banks. It indicates the total interest earned
to total working fund ratio is stable. KBL has higher coefficient of variation among
other two banks. That means it is not successful in earning interest income because
high ratio is an indicator of high earning power of the bank on its total working fund
and vice versa.
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 4.54 3.88 3.82 3.29 2.54 2.52 3.43 0.7333 21.37
KBL 3.25 2.64 1.92 1.69 1.42 1.60 2.09 0.6488 31.09
BOK 5.01 4.48 3.72 3.01 2.45 2.51 3.53 0.9666 27.38
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.19
Total Interest Paid to Total Working Fund Ratio
In the Table 4.19, total interests paid to working fund ratio of the all banks are in
decreasing trends during the study period. NIBL has variable trend from 4.54% to
2.52% in the FY 2000/01 to 2012/013. KBL and BOK have also variable trend from
3.25% to 1.60% and 5.01% to 2.51% respectively.
In comparison of mean value of NIBL with other reveal that NIBL is in average
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 80
between KBL and BOK i.e. 3.43 > 2.09 < 3.53. It means NIBL has paid average
interest. Similarly the coefficient of variance of it has lower among both banks
which indicates that total interest and to total working fund ratio is inconsistent than
that of KBL and BOK.
After analysis it can be concluded that NIBL is in better position from payment of
interest point of view. It seems to be successful to collect its working fund from less
expensive sources in comparison to others.
Through these ratios, focus has been made to measure the level of risk inherent in
the NIBL in comparison to the KBL and BOK.
Table 4.20
Credit Risk Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 59.52 62.09 62.63 62.60 73.60 61.50 63.66 4.5691 7.18
KBL 58.75 55.87 55.93 57.50 70.71 56.96 59.29 5.2014 8.77
BOK 65.92 74.51 62.88 60.30 63.51 63.13 65.04 4.5383 6.98
(Source: Annual ReportProperty
of Bank of
) Shanker Dev Campus Library 81
Figure 4.20
Credit Risk Ratio
The Table and Figure 4.20 shows the percentage of credit risk ratio of NIBL, KBL
and BOK. The credit risk ratio of NIBL is in fluctuating trend during the study
period i.e. it has maintained maximum ratio of 73.60% in the FY 2011/012 and it
has minimum ratio of 59.52% in the year 2000/01. Similarly KBL credit risk ratio is
increasing trend it has maintained maximum ratio of 70.71% and BOK credit risk
ratio is decreasing trend i.e. from 74.51%, 62.88%, and 60.30% and increasing
63.51%, 63.13% respectively.
The mean of NIBL is between KBL and BOK which mean NIBL has average credit
in comparison to both banks. The coefficient of variance of NIBL is 7.18% KBL has
8.77% and BOK has 6.98%. Among three banks BOK has less C.V, it indicates that
its credit policy is consistent than other banks.
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 18.25 11.03 17.02 7.84 10.39 11.25 12.63 3.7256 29.50
KBL 5.13 6.78 8.51 6.87 3.83 3.26 5.73 1.8349 32.02
BOK 19.68 11.95 11.23 10.11 8.28 6.95 11.37 4.0842 35.93
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.21
Liquidity Risk Ratio
The Table and Figure 4.21 show the percentage of liquidity risk ratio of NIBL, KBL
and BOK. This table reflects the liquidity risk ratio of NIBL is fluctuating trend i.e.
it has maintained a maximum ratio of 18.25% in the FY 2000/01 and the minimum
ratio of 7.84% in the FY 2010/011. Similarly KBL and BOK liquidity risk ratio is in
decreasing trend. The minimum ratios of both banks are 3.26% and 6.95 in the FY
2012/013.
While comparing the mean of three banks, KBL is between NIBL and BOK i.e.
12.63 > 5.73 <Property of Shanker
11.37 which Dev
indicates Campus
that NIBL Library
liquidity 83
risk is average in compare
to other banks. The coefficients of variance of three banks are 29.50%, 32.02%,
35.93% respectively. In comparison them, NIBL has less C.V which indicates that
liquidity risk ratio of it’s in consistent. The C.V ratio of NIBL is slightly lowers than
that of BOK i.e. 29.50% < 32.02%.
Table 4.22
Capital Risk Ratio
Fiscal Year
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Mean S.D C.V
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) %
NIBL 10.63 13.73 10.74 9.82 8.37 6.82 10.02 2.1470 21.43
KBL 15.74 4.99 11.78 12.48 11.68 9.76 11.07 3.2495 29.35
BOK 7.69 10.25 10.60 10.32 10.41 9.50 9.80 1.0022 10.23
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
From the Table and Figure 4.22, it is clearly seen that the percentage of capital risk
ratio of NIBL is decreasing from 13.73% to 6.82% in the FY 2008/09 to 2012/013
during the study period. NIBL has maximum ratio of 13.73% and minimum ratio of
6.82%. Similarly KBL and BOK have followed the fluctuating trend. They have
maximum ratio of 15.74 and 10.60% in the FY 2000/01 and 2009/010 respectively.
The mean value of NIBL has average capital risk ratio in comparison with other two
banks. The coefficient of variance of a NIBL is 21.43% that is higher than that of
BOK’s C.V and lesser than KBL i.e. 21.43% < 29.35% > 10.23% respectively.
Among three banks BOK has less C.V.
Thus it can be concluded that NIBL is stable and heterogeneous than KBL but less
stable and less heterogeneous in comparison to the BOK because it has maintained
less C.V among three banks.
Figure 4.23
Growth Ratio of Total Deposit
Table 4.24
Growth Ratio of Loan and Advances
Fiscal Year Growth
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Ratio
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
NIBL 3005.76 4044.23 5049.58 6095.84 7900.00 9801.31 26.67
KBL 7732.64 7437.89 7755.95 8189.99 10586.17 12922.50 10.82
BOK 4127.05 4613.61 4542.70 5646.69 5656.69 7259.08 11.96
(Source: Annual Report of Bank )
Figure 4.24
Growth Ratio of Loan and Advances
Table 4.25
Growth Ratio of Total Investment
Fiscal Year Growth
Bank 2007/08 2008/09 2009/010 2010/011 2011/012 2012/013 Ratio
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)
NIBL 901.72 1779.17 1654.00 2535.70 2128.90 4200.52 36.03
KBL 7704.31 8199.51 6031.17 5835.95 4267.23 6178.53 4.31
BOK 419.82 667.46 1816.15 2477.40 2598.25 3378.13 51.74
(Source: Annual Report of Bank)
Figure 4.25
Growth Ratio of Total Investment
Figure 4.26
Growth Ratio of Total Net Profit
From the table and figure concluded that NIBL performance regarding the collection
of deposit, granting loan and advances on total investment and net profit is
comparatively better.
The Table 4.27 shows the value of ‘r’, r2, P.Er, 6P.Er between outside asset and net
profit of NIBL, KBL and BOK.
Table 4.27
Coefficient of Correlation between outside Asset and Net Profit
Banks Evaluation criterions
R r2 P.Er 6P.Er
NIBL 0.991132 0.98234334 0.004862 0.029172
KBL 0.703899 0.4954735 0.138928 0.833569
BOK 0.931841 0.868326862 0.036258 0.217548
(Source: Appendix)
Figure 4.27
Coefficient of Correlation between outside Asset and Net Profit
The above Table and Figure 4.27 shows the value of r, r2, P.Er, 6P.Er between
Property
deposit and loan of Shanker
and advances Dev Campus
of NIBL Library 90
with comparison to KBL and BOK for the
study period 2000/01 to 2012/013. From this table, it has been found that the
coefficient of correlation between total outside i.e. independent variable and net
profit dependent variable is 0.991132 in case of NIBL. It shows positive relationship
between these variables. By considering the value of coefficient of determination
(r2), is 0.98234334 indicated that 98.23% of the variation in the dependent variable
has been explained by the independent variable. Similarly considering the value of r
is greater than the value of 6P.Er, which reveals NIBL is capable to earn net profit
by mobilizing in total outside assets. Likewise, the coefficient of correlation
between total outside assets and net profit in the case of KBL and BOK are
0.703899 and 0.931841. Again when we consider the value of coefficient
determination (r2) i.e. 0.4954735 and 0.868326862, it means 49.54% and 86.83%
respectively in the dependent variable has been explained by the independent
variable. On the basis of comparison between the value of ‘r’ and 6P.Er there is no
significant correlation between two variables because the value of ‘r’ i.e. 0.703899
and 0.931841 is lesser than that of the value 6P.Er i.e. 0.833569 and 0.217548. The
above analysis clears that; the value of ‘r’ in case of NIBL is significant correlation
between mobilizations of funds return. But in the case of KBL and BOK the value
of ‘r’ is far less than 6P.Er, so both banks have no significant correlation between
mobilization of funds and returns.
From this Table and Figure, it has been found that the coefficient of correlation
between total deposits and net profit in the case of NIBL is 0.992623, which
indicated the position relationship between these variables. The coefficient of
determination (r2) is 0.985300, which indicates 98.53% of the variation of the
dependent variable has been explained by the independent variable. Similarly, the
value of 6P.Er is lesser than the value of r i.e. 0.024286 < 0.992623, which states
that there exists a significant relationship between deposits and net profit. The
coefficient of correlation between deposits and net profit in case of KBL 0.453762
which indicated a positive relationship between deposit and net profit. The value of
(r2) is 0.2058996 indicates that 20.58% of the variation of the dependent variable has
been explained by the independent variable. The value of ‘r’ is greater than that of
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 92
the value of 6P.Er. This states that there is significant relationship between these
variables.
Table 4.29
Coefficient of Correlation between Deposit and Interest Earned
Banks Evaluation criterions
R r2 P.Er 6P.Er
NIBL 0.988856 0.977836244 0.006103 0.036619
KBL 0.887261 0.78723161 0.058589 0.351532
BOK 0.973789 0.948264 0.014246 0.085476
(Source: Appendix)
In Table no 4.30 the coefficient of correlation between loan and advances and
interest paid in the case of NIBL is 0913502. It shows the positive relationship
between two variables. The coefficient of determination (r2) in case of NIBL shows
a higher degree dependency than KBL and lower degree dependency than BOK. The
value of r is greater than value of 6P.Er in case of NIBL which states that there is
significant relationship between loan and advances and interest paid. Similarly the
coefficient of correlation between loan and advances and interest paid in the case of
KBL and BOK are -0.38218 and -0.02945. They show the negative relationship
between these variables. The values of coefficient of determination (r2) are 0.146060
and 0.0008671 it means 14.60% and 0.086% of the variation in the dependent
variable is explained by the independent variable. Again considering, the value of r
and comparing with 6P.Er in both cases it is lesser than 6P.Er which reveals that the
value is not significant relationship between two variables. In conclusion, it can be
clear that the relationship between loan and advances and interest in case of NIBL is
highly significant than both other banks. It is successful to utilize the loan and
advances. In case of KBL and BOK have no relationship could be established
between the loan and advances and interest paid.
Table 4.31
Coefficient of Correlation between Total Working Fund and Net Profit
Banks Evaluation criterions
R r2 P.Er 6P.Er
NIBL 0.991184 0.982448 0.004834 0.029004
KBL 0.611661 0.374128 0.172342 1.034053
BOK 0.955852 0.913653499 0.023777 0.14266
(Source: Appendix)
The Table 4.31 shows the value of ‘r’, r2, P.Er, 6P.Er between outside asset and net
profit of NIBL, KBL and BOK.
The coefficient of correlation ‘r’ between total working fund and net profit in case
of NIBL is 0.991184 which indicates positive relationship between these variables.
The coefficient of determination (r2) is 0.982448, which states that 98.24% of the
variation of the dependent variable has been explained by independent variable.
Similarly considering the value of ‘r’ 0.991184 and comparing it with 6P.Er
0.029004, the value of ‘r’ is greater than the value of 6P.Er, so it is significant
relation between these variables. Similarly the value of ‘r’ between these variables
in case of BOK is 0.955852, which shows the positive relationship. In case of KBL
its value is 0.611661 that means it has significant relation between these variable.
The coefficient of determination r2 in case of KBL and BOK are 0.374128 and
0.913653499, which shows that only 37.41% and 91.36% of the variation of the
dependent variables have been explained by independent variables. The value of
6P.Er is greater than ‘r’ i.e 0.611661< 1.034053 in case of KBL. So there is
significant relation. But, the value of ‘r’ is lesser than 6P.Er in case of BOK, so there
is significant relationship between these variables. After analysis the conclusion can
be drawn that NIBL and BOK are significant relationship between these variable,
which indicated that total working fund is significantly used to generate earnings. In
case of KBL there is significant relation so fell to generate earnings or in other
words these variables
Propertyareofsignificant
Shanker Devcorrelated.
Campus Library 96
4.7 Regression Analysis
Regression of Networking Capital and Net Profit
Regression is the statistical tool which is used to determine the statistical
relationship between two or more variables and so make estimate of one variable on
the basis of the other variable. Regression is the line which gives the best estimate of
one variable for any given value of the other variable. The regression line of Y on X
estimate the most probable values of Y for given values of X.
X is independent variable
Y in dependent variable
The regression equation of Y on X expressed as Y = a + bx
Where, a and b are parameters of the line.
To find out the exact relationship between different variable simple regressions
analysis has been done and results of the analysis have been table.
Table 4.32
Calculation of Regression Equation between Net Profits on Total Working Fund
Banks Regression equation Value (a) constant Regression coefficient
(b)
NIBL Y= -20.85 + a = -20.85 b = 0.0161822
0.0161822X
KBL Y = 272.50495 + a = 272.50495 b = 0.0390619
0.0390619X
The Table 4.32 shows the regression equation of net profit and net working fund in
NIBL, KBL and BOK. According to the table regression equation of net profit on
net working fund Y= -20.85 + 0.0161822X in NIBL is negative. The regression
coefficient is positive i.e. 0.0161822 which indicates the positive relationship exists
between net profit and net working fund. In other word, one million increase in net
working funds leads to average about 0.0161822 million increase in net profit. The
Property
value of constant of Shankerlow.
(a) is relatively DevThe
Campus
valueLibrary 97
of (a) indicates that if net working
fund is 0 then the value of net profit is -20.85 million. So from analysis it shows that
the net profit will be decrease and net working fund also decrease.
On the other hand, regression coefficient of (b) is positive in case of KBL which
indicates that one million increase in net working fund lead to an average about Rs. -
0.0390619 increases in net profit. According to the above table regression equation
of net profit on net working fund regression coefficient is positive which reveals the
positive relationship between net and working fund. The test of t statistics helps us
to conclude that in all three cases the results are not statistically significant at 5%
level of significance since the value of t is small than tabulated value.
Table 4.33
Calculation of Regression Equation between Net Profits on Total Deposit
Banks Regression equation Value (a) Regression coefficient
constant (b)
NIBL Y = 17.129 + 0.0185X a = 17.129987 b = 0.0185577
(Source: Appendix)
The Table 4.33 is the collection of major output of simple regression analysis of net
profit on total deposit.
The regression equation of net profit (Y) dependent variable on total deposit (X)
independent variable Y = 17.129987 = 0.0185577 in NIBL is positive i.e. 0.0185577
which indicates the positive relationship exists between net profit and total deposit
or it can be said that one million increase in total deposit leads to average 0.0185577
million increase in net profit. The value of constant (a) is relatively high. Similarly
in case of BOK the regression coefficient is positive or in other words one million
increases in total deposit leads to average about 0.0322197 million increase in net
profit. The value of constant (a) indicates that the net profit can be increase and total
deposit also increase. The regression coefficient of (b) is positive in case of KBL i.e.
0.0299269 which indicates that one million increase in total deposit leads to an
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 98
average about 0.0299269 increases in net profit. The regression coefficient is
positive which reveals the positive relationship between net profit and total deposit.
From the test of‘t’ statistics it can be concluded that in all three cases the results are
not statistically significant at 5% level of significance since the value of t is smaller
than tabulated value.
2. The mean ratio of cash and bank balance to current assets of NIBL is higher than
KBL and BOK. It states that liquidity position of NIBL is better in this regard.
The C.V between them is 31.02%. On the basis of C.V the ratios are seemed to
be variable. NIBL is better position in maintaining its cash and bank balance to
meet its daily requirement to make the payments on customers deposit
withdrawal in comparison with KBL and BOK.
3. The loans and advances to total deposit ratio of NIBL has in increasing trend.
The mean ratio of NIBL is higher than KBL and lower than BOK. The mean
ratio is 71.78% with 4.21% C.V which shows that the ratios are satisfactory
consistent over the study period.
4. Investment to total deposit of all three banks has in fluctuating trend during the
study period. The mean ratio of total investment to total deposit of NIBL is in
between the KBL and BOK. The highest ratio is 31.45% and lowest is 19.71%
with mean ratio 26.39% and C.V of 18.21%. It is in between KBL and BOK so
the ratio is less consistent and more variable. Its overall figure suggests that the
banks have not mobilized significant amount of fund on the government
securities and shares and debentures of other companies.
6. The investment on shares and debenture to total working fund ratios of NIBL
and BOK have fluctuating trend but KBL has increasing trend. The mean ratio
of NIBL is found to be 17.0 with 36.61% C.V between the other compared
banks. It shows the ratio of NIBL is very stable over the study period.
7. Total off balance sheet operation to loan and advances ratios of all three banks
have decreasing trend. The mean of the ratio of NIBL is found to be 2093.85
with C.V 50.73%. It has highest C.V. than that of others compared a bank which
indicates that the ratio is not consistent during the study period. The analysis of
the ratios shows that OBS operation of the bank is in decreasing trend. It may be
due to competition in the banking sector or bank is not getting enough attention
towards non-funded business.
8. The mean ratio of return on loans and advances ratio of NIBL is higher than
BOK and is lower than KBL. The mean of the ratio is found to be 2.25% with
C.V of 7.85%, which indicates that the ratios are less variable. The average ratio
of 2.25% suggests that the earning capacity of the bank's loan and advances is
satisfactory.
9. Return on total working fund ratios are in fluctuating trend during the study
period. Its ratio ranges from 1.17% to 1.49%. The mean ratio of NIBL is in
between KBL and BOK i.e. NIBL ratio is 1.37% with C.V of 8.55%. This
indicates that the ratios are less variable and consistent than that of other
compared banks.
10. The mean ratio of total interest earned to total outside assets of KBL is lowest
of all. The total interest earned to total outside assets ratio of the KBL is less
variable in comparison to NIBL and BOK. Its lowest C.V indicates that the
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 100
ratios are satisfactory consistent during the study period.
11. The total interest paid to working fund ratios has decreasing trend during the
study period. The mean ratio of total interest paid to total working fund of NIBL
is average than KBL lower than BOK, which means it has paid average interest
than KBL and BOK. The total interests paid to working fund ratios are lesser
than to total interest earned to total fund ratio. This indicates that the bank is in
profitability position as it is earning higher return than it interest cost.
12. Credit risk ratios of the banks are fluctuating trend. The mean of the ratios of
NIBL is found to be 63.66% which are higher than KBL and lower than BOK.
Similarly its C.V is 7.18% which is less in compared with other banks. It
indicates that its credit policy is consistent than other banks.
13. Liquidity risk ratio of the banks are decreasing trend. The mean liquidity risk
ratio of NIBL is highest of all and C.V of its also lowest in comparison with
other banks. So the ratio of NIBL is less variable than KBL and BOK.
14. The mean capital risk ratio of NIBL is in between the compared banks. The ratio
of NIBL is less variable, which indicates that the capital risk ratio is consistent.
15. The analysis of the growth ratio of total deposits total loan and advances, total
investments, and net profit of NIBL in comparison with KBL and BOK during
the study period shows that the total deposits of the bank is in increasing trend
with the net growth rate of 24.72%. It has maintained growth rate highest that
other compared banks. This means the performance of NIBL to collect deposit in
comparison to other banks is better year by year.
16. The growth rate of NIBL is higher than that of KBL and BOK. It has maintained
growth rate of 26.67%, where as KBL and BOK has 10.82% and 11.96%
respectively. So the performance of NIBL to grant loan and advances in
comparison to other bank is year by year.
5.1 Summary
Commercial banks are major financial institutions, which occupy quite an important
place in the framework of every economy because they provide capital for the
development of industry trade and business and other resources deflect sectors
investing the saving collected as deposit commercial banks , by playing active role
have changed the economic structure of the world. Commercial banks have its own
role and contribution in the economic development; it maintains economic
confidence of various segments and extends credit to people. The banking sector has
to play developmental role to boost the economy by adopting the growth oriented
investment policy and building up the financial structure for future economic
development formulation of sound investment policies and planned effort pushed
forward the force of economic growth. The income and profit of the bank depends
upon its lending procedure, lending policy and investment of its fund utilize in
different securities. Commercial banks able to utilize its deposits properly i.e.
providing loans and advances or lending for a profitable project, the reason behind it
is lack of sound investment policy. The main objective of this study is to evaluate
the profit planning policies adopted by NIBL, KBL and BOK. The study is totally
based on secondary sources of data and required data have been collected by using
various published and unpublished sources.
There are 30 commercial banks have been operating in Nepal which are considered
to be the population of the study and out of them three commercial banks i.e. NIBL,
KBL, BOK has been taken as a sample of the study and the collected data have been
analyzed by using various financial tools and statistical tools like ratio analysis,
correlation coefficient, regression equation etc.
Regarding the profit planning policies of commercial banks there are basically five
basic principles of the bank follow while providing the loans i.e. liquidity,
profitability, security
Propertyand suitability
of Shanker Devdiversification.
Campus Library Various
103 process while making
investment decision are applied in the study i.e. set investment process, security
analysis, portfolio construction, revision, performance evaluation .The data obtained
from annual reports of the concerned banks, likewise the financial statements of six
years were selected for the purpose of evaluation.
5.2 Conclusion
The liquidity position of NIBL is comparatively better than that of KBL and BOK.
In spite of the current ratio is average among the other two banks NIBL has
maintained the cash and bank balance to meet the customers demand. All the three
banks have met the normal standard current assets ratio to meet the short term
obligation of its customers. NIBL has invested highest sectors like government
securities than BOK and lesser portion than that of KBL. BOK had mobilized lots of
its funds in order to gain the high profit.
From the analysis of assets management ratio it can be found that NIBL is in better
position as compared to that of KBL and BOK. The loans and advances to total
deposit ratio, loan and advances to total working fund ratio of NIBL lies In between
those of KBL and BOK. NIBL has invested the highest portion of total working
fund on government securities as compared to KBL and BOK. Due to more efficient
loan policy, KBL suffers less from loan loss provision. It takes low credit risk and
has sufficient deposits of none bearing interest which can be used in a creation
period. Anyhow NIBL has also trying to best in loan loss provision. Investment on
shares and debentures to total working fund ratio is higher in BOK.
The interest earned to total outside assets and return on total working fund ratio of
NIBL is lowest of all. But overall analysis of profitability ratios, NIBL is average
profitable in comparison to other compared bank i.e. KBL and BOK. To make the
profit BOK is taking highest risk by providing the higher portion of its deposit as a
loan.The return on loan and advances ratio and return on assets of NIBL is lowest of
all. The ratio suggests that the earning capacity of the bank's loan and advances is
satisfactory. The return on assets of the bank is good in average; it indicates the
good earning capacity of the bank assets and good utilization of its assets.
5.3 Recommendations
On the basis of the findings of the study, following recommendations can be
drawn:-
1. In commercial banks the liquidity position affects external and internal factors
such as saving for investment situations, central banks requirements, the leading
policies management capacity etc. In this study it should try to lower the current
liabilities to improve its liquidity position. Current ratio of all three banks is not
satisfactory. It is below its standard rate 2:1. So the banks are suggested to
improve current assets. The ratio of cash and bank balance to total deposit and
current assets of NIBL is higher than that of KBL and BOK. It means NIBL has
higher cash and bank balance which decrease profit of bank, so it is
recommended to mobilize cash and bank balance in profitable as loan and
advances. In practice joint ventured banks are urban based; service quite a few
elite, a fluent big customer are heavily dependent on free based activities. To
overcome its situation they should be accessible to rural areas and possible loan
and advances to its deposit. So the customers is enjoying by getting deposit
borrowing and other services.
2. NIBL has invested its more of the funds that is total investment on total deposit
ratio but the percentages of investment on share and debenture is nominal. So it
is suggested to invest more of its fund in share and debenture of different
companies.Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 105
3. KBL loan and advances to total deposit ratio is lowest in compared to other
banks. To overcome from the situation it is recommended to follow liberal
lending policy and invest more and more of total deposit in loan and advances
and maintain stability on the investment policy. Profitability ratios of banks are
not satisfactory, if resources held idle bank have to bearded more cost and result
would be lower profit margin. So portfolio condition of a bank should be
regularly revised from time to time. It should always try to maintain the
equilibrium in the portfolio condition of the bank. The bank should use its funds
in more portfolio sectors. It should utilize its risky assets and shareholders' funds
and it should reduce its express and should try to collect cheaper fund being
more profitable.
4. KBL has taken the low credit risk as KBL is one of the largest commercial bank
in Nepal. It must also interest as NIBL and BOK do. The risk taken by NIBL
from the angle of credit risk and capital risk are in an average but the
consistencies of the same are highly volatile which may result higher loss. So it
should not test such risk on an experiment basis it should carefully study it so as
to achieve higher return from the above risk. In the light of growing competition
in the banking sector the business of the bank is customer oriented. It should
strengthen and active its marketing function, as it is an effective tool of
attracting and retaining customers. The bank should develop on “Innovative
approach to bank marketing and formulate new strategies of serving customers
in a more convenient way. The investment policy of NIBL is good in every
aspect as studied above but the consistency in the above investment sectors is in
equilibrium states. It is found that at time bank focuses much of its attention to
one sector leaving other sector untouched, so it is recommended to touch all the
sectors and balance it effectively as to have the optimal performance of the
bank.
Books:
Baidhya, S (1996). Banking Management, Kathmandu: Monitor Nepal.
Balla, V.K. (1993). Investment Managements, New Delhi: S. Chand and Company.
Bexley, J B. (1987). Banking Management, New Delhi: Sujeet Pulication
Charles, P. J. (1991). Investment Analysis and Management, Bombay: Himalyan Publishing
House.
Crosse, H.D. (1963). Management Policies for Commercial Banks, 2nd Ed. Engle cwood cliffs,
Prentic Hall Inc. N.J.
Frank, K. R. (1999). Inestment. The Dryden Press, CBS Publishing Japan Ltd.
John, M.C. & Edward, A. M. (1998). Fundamentals of Investment, St. Pant: West Publishing
Company
Kothari, C.R. (1984). “Quantitative Techniques”, (New Delhi, Vikash Publishing House)
Sharpe J. W. & Gordon, J. A., Bailey, A. (1999). Investment, New Delhi Prentice Hall of India
Pvt. Ltd.
Shrestha, M.K. (1994). Financial Management, Theory and Practice, 1st Ed, Curriculum
Development Center, T.U. Kathmandu.
Van Horne, J.C. (1985). Fundamentals of Financial Management, 5th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice
Hall of India Ltd.
Van Horne, J.C. (1998). Financial Management and Policy, 10th Ed. New Delhi: Prentice Hall
Pvt. Ltd.
Weston, B.G & Bigham, S.J. (1980). Managerial Finance, 7th Ed., U.S.A, The Dryden Press,
Hinsdale Illinois.
Wolf, H.K. Pant, P.R. (1999). Social Science Research and Thesis Writing, Second Edition,
Kathmandu, Buddha Academic Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
REVIEW OF ARTICLES
Bajracharya, B.B. (2047). Monetary Policy and Deposit Mobilization in Nepal. Rajat Jayanti
Smarika, RBB, Kathmandu.
Bank of Kathmandu Ltd. (2062) Annual Report.Kathmandu: BOK
Thesis
Khadka, Raja Ram (2014) A study on the investment policy of KBL Bank Ltd in comparison to
other Joint Venture Banks of Nepal, An Unpublished Master Degrees Thesis, Nepal
Commerce Campus.
Let,
(
1 + g = 9801.31
3005.76
) 1/ 5
(
1 + g = 13802.44 ) 1/ 5
(
1 + g = 12922.5
7732.64
) 1/ 5
4574.51
g = 10.82%
g = 24.72%
Total deposit growth ratio of KUMARI
n −1 Total Loans and advances growth rate of BOK
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
n −1
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
6 −1
19347.4 =15839 (1 + g )
6 −1
7259.08 = 4127.05 (1 + g )
(
1 + g = 19347.4 )
1/ 5
15839
(
1 + g = 7259.08
4127.05
) 1/ 5
g = 4.08%
g = 11.96%
Total deposit growth ratio of BOK
n −1
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
Total investment growth ratio of NIBL
6 −1
10485= 5713.49 (1 + g ) n −1
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
(
1 + g = 10485
5713.49
) 1/ 5
4200.52 = 901.72 (1 + g )
6 −1
g = 12.91%
(
1 + g = 4200.52
901.72
)1/ 5
6 −1
6178.53 = 7704 (1 + g )
(
1 + g = 6178.53
7704
) 1/ 5
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
n −1 Total net profit growth ratio of KUMARI
n −1
6 −1 Dn = D0 (1 + g )
3378.13 = 419.82 (1 + g )
6 −1
635.3= 291.38 (1 + g )
(
1 + g = 3378.13
419.82
)1/ 5
g = 51.74%
(
1 + g = 635.3
291.38
) 1/ 5
g = 16.87%
Total net profit growth ratio of NIBL
Dn = D0 (1 + g )
n −1 Total net profit growth ratio of BOK
n −1
6 −1 Dn = D0 (1 + g )
237.38 = 69.70 (1 + g )
6 −1
202.44 =65.36 (1 + g )
(
1 + g = 237.38
69.70
)1/ 5
g = 27.77%
(
1 + g = 202.44
65.36
) 1/ 5
g = 25.37%
a=
∑ y = 48700.1 = 8116.68 b=
∑ xy = 55050.98 = 2897.42
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-2
Trend analysis of total deposit of KUMARI
Fiscal Year(t) Total Deposit (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 15839 -2 4 -31678 9774.348
2008/09 15506.43 -1 1 -15506.43 12624.354
2009/010 13447.66 0 0 0.00 15474.36
2010/011 14119.03 1 1 14119.03 18324.366
2011/012 14586.66 2 4 29173.32 21174.372
2012/013 19347.40 3 9 58042.20 24024.378
Total 92846.18 19 54150.12
a=
∑ y = 92846.18 = 15474.36 b=
∑ xy = 54150.12 = 2850.006
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-3
Trend analysis of total deposit of BOK
Fiscal Year(t) Total Deposit (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 5713.49 -2 4 -11426.98 3259.459
2008/09 5723.29 -1 1 -5723.29 5361.137
2009/010 6170.71 0 0 0.00 7462.815
2010/011 7741.65 1 1 7741.65 9564.493
2011/012 8942.75 2 4 17885.50 11666.171
2012/013 10485 3 9 31455 13767.849
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 113
Total 44776.89 19 39931.88
a=
∑ y = 44776.89 = 7462.815 b=
∑ xy = 39931.88 = 2101.678
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-4
Trend analysis of Loan and advances of NIBL
Fiscal Year(t) Loan & advances(Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 3005.76 -2 4 -6011.52 1591.093
2008/09 3948.48 -1 1 -3948.48 3726.113
2009/010 4908.46 0 0 0 5861.133
2010/011 5884.12 1 1 5884.12 7996.153
2011/012 7618.67 2 4 15237.34 10131.173
2012/013 9801.31 3 9 29403.921 12266.193
Total 35166.797 19 40565.381
a=
∑ y = 35166.797 = 5861.133 b=
∑ xy = 40565.381 = 2135.02
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-5
Trend analysis of Loan and advances of KUMARI
Fiscal Year(t) Loan & advances (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 7732.64 -2 4 -15465.28 4343.483
2008/09 7437.89 -1 1 -7437.89 6723.84
2009/010 7755.95 0 0 0 9104.197
2010/011 8189.99 1 1 8189.99 11484.554
2011/012 10586.17 2 4 21172.34 13864.911
2012/013 12922.5 3 9 38767.62 16245.268
Total 54625.18 19 45226.78
a=
∑ y = 54625.18 = 19104.197 b=
∑ xy = 45226.78 = 2380.357
n 6 ∑x 2
19
a=
∑ y = 32101.712 = 5350.285 b=
∑ xy = 26381.386 = 1388.494
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-7
Trend analysis of total investment of NIBL
Fiscal Year(t) Total investment (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 901.72 -2 4 -1803.44 512.1062
2008/09 1693.03 -1 1 -1693.03 1348.8741
2009/010 1653.98 0 0 0 2185.642
2010/011 2535.7 1 1 2535.7 3022.4099
2011/012 2128.9 2 4 4257.8 3859.1778
2012/013 4200.52 3 9 12601.56 4695.9457
Total 13113.85 19 15898.59
a=
∑ y = 1311385 = 2185.642 b=
∑ xy = 15898.59 = 836.7679
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-8
Trend analysis of total investment of KUMARI
Fiscal Year(t) Total investment (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 7704.31 -2 4 -15408.62 5390.7288
2008/09 8199.51 -1 1 -8199.51 5880.0904
2009/010 6031.18 0 0 0 6369.452
2010/011 5835.95 1 1 5835.95 6858.8136
2011/012 4267.23 2 4 8534.46 7348.1752
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 115
2012/013 6178.53 3 9 18535.59 7837.5368
Total 38216.71 19 9297.87
a=
∑ y = 38216.71 = 6369.452 b=
∑ xy = 9297.87 = 489.3616
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix: 9
Trend analysis of total investment of BOK
Fiscal Year(t) Total investment (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 419.82 -2 4 -839.64 176.95
2008/09 667.46 -1 1 -667.46 1034.91
2009/010 1816.15 0 0 0 1892.87
2010/011 2477.4 1 1 2477.4 2750.83
2011/012 2598.25 2 4 5196.5 3608.78
2012/013 3378.13 3 9 10134.39 4466.74
Total 11357.21 19 16301.19
a=
∑ y = 11357.21 = 1892.868 b=
∑ xy = 16301.19 = 857.9574
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix: 10
Trend analysis of net profit of NIBL
Fiscal Year(t) Net profit (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 69.7 -2 4 -139.4 31.12
2008/09 85.35 -1 1 -85.35 82.31
2009/010 94.18 0 0 0 133.50
2010/011 143.57 1 1 143.57 184.68
2011/012 170.8 2 4 341.6 235.87
2012/013 237.38 3 9 712.14 287.06
Total 800.98 19 972.56
a=
∑ y = 800.98 = 133.4967 b=
∑ xy = 972.56 = 51.18737
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-11
PropertyTrend analysis
of Shanker of net
Dev profit of
Campus KUMARI
Library 116
Fiscal Year(t) Net profit (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 291.38 -2 4 -582.76 163.62
2008/09 271.64 -1 1 -271.64 297.52
2009/010 416.24 0 0 0 431.42
2010/011 455.31 1 1 455.31 565.32
2011/012 518.64 2 4 1037.28 699.22
2012/013 635.3 3 9 1905.9 833.12
Total 2588.51 19 2544.09
a=
∑ y = 2588.51 = 431.4183 b=
∑ xy = 2544.09 = 133.8995
n 6 ∑x 2
19
Appendix:-12
Trend analysis of net profit of BOK
Fiscal Year(t) Net profit (Y) X = t-2003 X2 XY Yc = a + bx
2007/08 65.36 -2 4 -130.72 12.39
2008/09 9.28 -1 1 -9.28 58.38
2009/010 82.13 0 0 0 104.37
2010/011 127.48 1 1 127.48 150.36
2011/012 139.52 2 4 279.04 196.35
2012/013 202.44 3 9 607.32 242.34
Total 626.21 19 873.84
a=
∑ y = 626.21 = 104.3683 b=
∑ xy = 873.84 = 45.99158
n 6 ∑x 2
19
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = 0.996406
n∑ x2 − (∑ x) n∑ y 2 − (∑ y )
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
1− r2 1 − 0.99282537
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.001976
n
6 (P.Er) = 0.011854
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = 0.735985
n∑ x − (∑ x) n∑ y − (∑ y )
2 2
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
Coefficient of Determination (r2) =0.735985 × 0.735985 = 0.54167374
1− r2 1 − 0.54167374
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.126206
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.757238
1− r 2 1 − 0.96274302
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.010259
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.061555
1− r2 1 − 0.87436424
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.03459
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.207573
Appendix:-17
Coefficient of correlation between deposit between and total investment of KUMARI
Years Deposit Total
(x) investment X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(y)
2007/08 15839 7704.31 364.64 132959.92 1334.85 1781845.88 486738.22
2008/09 15506.43 8199.51 32.06 1028.27 1830.05 3349112.28 58683.92
2009/010 13447.66 6031.18 -2026.70 4107526.27 -338.27 114427.95 685576.98
2010/011 14119.03 5835.95 -1355.33 1836928.35 -533.50 284624.38 723073.02
2011/012 14586.66 4267.23 -887.70 788017.15 -2102.22 4419337.34 1866149.41
2012/013 19347.4 6178.53 3873.04 15000413.30 -190.92 36451.21 -739447.91
Total 92846.18 38216.71 0.00 21866873.24 0.00 9985799.04 3080773.64
Mean 15474.36 6369.45
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
1− r2 1 − 0.04346604
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.263395
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 1.580367
Appendix:-18
Coefficient of correlation between deposit between and total investment of BOK
Years Deposit Total
(x) investment X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(y)
1− r2 1 − 0.856596
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.039488
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.236929
1− r2 1 − 0.98234334
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.004862
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.029172
1− r2 1 − 0.495473511
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.138928
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.833569
1− r2 1 − 0.868326862
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.036258
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.217548
Appendix:-22
Coefficient of correlation between total deposit and Net profit of NIBL
Years Deposit Net
(x) profit X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(y)
2007/08 4574.51 69.70 -3542.17 12546991.69 -63.78 4070.02 225978.97
2008/09 5466.60 85.35 -2650.08 7022941.50 -48.15 2318.10 127592.77
2009/010 6694.96 94.18 -1421.72 2021297.14 -39.32 1545.80 55897.47
2010/011 8063.90 143.57 -52.78 2786.077 10.07 101.47 -531.70
2011/012 10097.69 170.80 1981.01 3924387.54 37.30 1391.54 73898.09
2012/013 13802.44 237.38 5685.76 32327829.25 103.88 10791.74 590655.17
Total 48700.10 800.98 0.00 57846233.20 0.00 20218.67 1073490.76
Mean 8116.68 133.49
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
Property of Shanker Dev Campus Library 125
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = 0.992623
n∑ x2 − (∑ x) n∑ y 2 − (∑ y )
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
Coefficient of Determination (r2) = 0.992623 × 0.992623 = 0.985300858
1− r2 1 − 0.985300858
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.004048
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.024286
Appendix:-23
Coefficient of correlation between deposit and net profit of KUMARI
Years Deposit(x) Net
profit X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(y)
2007/08 15839.00 291.38 364.64 132959.92 -140.04 19610.72 -51063.10
2008/09 15506.43 271.64 32.07 1028.27 -159.78 25529.10 -5123.56
2009/010 13447.66 416.24 -2026.70 4107526.27 -15.18 230.38 30761.91
2010/011 14119.03 455.31 -1355.33 1836928.35 23.89 570.81 -32381.22
2011/012 14586.66 518.64 -887.70 788017.15 87.22 7607.62 -77426.99
2012/013 19347.40 635.30 3873.04 15000413.28 203.88 41567.75 789641.30
Total 92846.18 2588.51 0.00 21866873.24 0.00 95116.40 654408.34
Mean 15474.36 431.42
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = 0.453762
n∑ x − (∑ x) n∑ y − (∑ y )
2 2
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
1− r2 1 − 0.205899635
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.218666
n 6
7 (P.Er) = 1.311997
1− r2 1 − 0.886009909
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.031389
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.188332
Appendix:-25
Coefficient of correlation between total deposit and interest earned of NIBL
Years Total Interest
deposit earned X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(x) (y)
2007/08 4574.51 385.02 -3542.17 12546991.90 -219.76 48293.71 778421.99
2008/09 5466.60 443.82 -2650.08 7022941.66 -160.96 25907.57 426552.91
2009/010 6694.96 520.17 -1421.72 2021297.23 -84.61 7158.56 120289.59
2010/011 8063.90 657.25 -52.78 2786.08 52.47 2753.28 -2769.63
2011/012 10097.69 719.3 1981.01 3924387.43 114.52 13115.22 226868.25
2012/013 13802.44 903.11 5685.76 32327828.91 298.33 89001.80 1696241.45
Total 48700.10 3628.67 0.00 57846233.20 0.00 186230.15 3245604.56
Mean 8116.68 604.78
1− r2 1 − 0.977836244
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.006103
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.036619
Appendix:26
Coefficient of correlation between total deposit and interest earned of KUMARI
Years Total Interest
deposit earned X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(x) (y)
2007/08 15839.00 1266.70 364.64 132960.14 135.76 18431.32 49503.85
2008/09 15506.43 1120.70 32.07 1028.29 -10.24 104.82 -328.30
2009/010 13447.66 1017.87 -2026.70 4107525.05 -113.07 12784.37 229155.25
2010/011 14119.03 1001.61 -1355.33 1836927.54 -129.33 16725.73 175282.50
2011/012 14586.66 1068.75 -887.70 788016.62 -62.19 3867.35 55204.47
2012/013 19347.40 1310.00 3873.04 15000415.60 179.06 32063.19 693513.75
Total 92846.18 6785.63 0.00 21866873.24 0.00 83976.79 1202331.53
Mean 15474.36 1130.94
1− r2 1 − 0.78723161
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.058589
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.351532
1− r2 1 − 0.948264704
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.014246
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.085476
Appendix:-28
Coefficient of correlation between loan and advances to interest paid of NIBL
Years Loan and Interest
X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
advances(x) paid (y)
2007/08 3005.76 236.14 -2855.37 8153154.00 -66.885 4473.60 190981.61
2008/09 3948.48 257.05 -1912.65 3658240.85 -45.975 2113.70 87934.22
2009/010 4908.46 307.63 -952.67 907585.52 4.605 21.20 -4387.05
2010/011 5884.12 316.37 22.99 528.40 13.345 178.08 306.76
2011/012 7618.67 299.56 1757.54 3088936.90 -3.465 12.00 -6089.87
2012/013 9801.30 401.4 3940.17 15524972.49 98.375 9677.64 387614.63
Total 35166.80 1818.15 0.00 31333418.17 0.00 16476.25 656360.30
Mean 5861.13 303.02
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
1− r2 1 − 0.834485072
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.045577
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.273461
Appendix:-29
Coefficient of correlation between loan and advances to interest paid of KUMARI
Years Loan and Interest
advances paid (y) X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(x)
2007/08 7732.64 578.36 -1371.56 1881167.70 204.78 41934.85 -280867.3
2008/09 7437.89 462.08 -1666.31 2776577.92 88.50 7832.25 -147468.1
2009/010 7755.95 317.35 -1348.25 1817769.08 -56.23 3161.81 75811.91
2010/011 8189.99 282.95 -914.21 835773.84 -90.63 8213.80 82854.55
2011/012 10586.17 243.54 1481.97 2196244.95 -130.04 16910.40 -192715.8
2012/013 12922.54 357.20 3818.34 14579745.79 -16.38 268.30 -62544.46
Total 54625.18 2241.48 0.00 24087279.2 0.00 78321.41 -524929.3
Mean 9104.19667 373.58
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = -0.38218
n∑ x − (∑ x) n∑ y − (∑ y )
2 2
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
Coefficient of Determination (r2) = -0.38218 × -0.38218 = 0.146060711
1− r2 1 − 0.146060711
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.235144
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 1.410862
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = -0.02945
n∑ x − (∑ x) n∑ y − (∑ y )
2 2
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
1− r2 1 − 0.000867175
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.275125
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 1.650748
1− r2 1 − 0.982444814
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.004834
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.029004
Appendix:-32
Coefficient of correlation between total working fund and net profit of KUMARI
Years Working Net
X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
fund (x) profit (y)
2007/08 17770.65 291.38 -250.07 62533.35 -140.04 19610.73 35018.92
2008/09 17529.25 271.64 -491.47 241539.52 -159.78 25529.11 78525.71
2009/010 16562.62 416.24 -1458.10 2126045.99 -15.18 230.38 22131.43
2010/011 16745.48 455.31 -1275.24 1626228.64 23.89 570.81 -30467.57
2011/012 17186.33 518.64 -834.39 696201.17 87.22 7607.62 -72776.63
2012/013 22329.97 635.3 4309.25 18569664.00 203.88 41567.75 878577.89
Total 108124.30 2588.51 0.00 23322212.67 0.00 95116.40 911009.75
Mean 18020.7167 431.4183
Coefficient of Correlation (r):
n∑ xy − ∑ x∑ y (6 ×) − (×)
r= = = 0.611661
n∑ x − (∑ x) n∑ y − (∑ y )
2 2
2 2
(6 ×) − ( )2 (6 ×) − ( )2
2
Coefficient of Determination
Property of(rShanker
) = 0.611661 × 0.611661
Dev Campus = 0.374128596
Library 132
1− r2 1 − 0.374128596
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.172342
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 1.034053
Appendix:-33
Coefficient of correlation between total working fund and net profit of BOK
Years Working Net
fund (x) profit X = x−x X2 Y = y− y Y2 XY
(y)
2007/08 6201.93 65.36 -2403.94 5778911.51 -39.01 1521.65 93773.48
2008/09 6356.65 9.28 -2249.22 5058975.63 -95.09 9041.78 213874.19
2009/010 7444.82 82.13 -1161.05 1348029.37 -22.24 494.54 25819.70
2010/011 9496.34 127.48 890.47 792942.75 23.11 534.15 20580.35
2011/012 9857.13 139.52 1251.26 1565659.92 35.15 1235.64 43984.03
2012/013 12278.33 202.44 3672.46 13486986.91 98.07 9618.06 360164.72
Total 51635.20 626.21 0.00 28031506.09 0.00 22445.83 758196.48
Mean 8605.87 104.37
1− r2 1 − 0.913653499
Pr obable( P.Er ) = 0.6745 × = 0.6745 × = 0.023777
n 6
6 (P.Er) = 0.14266
Appendix no:-35
Regression equation between net profit on total working fund of KUMARI
Year Working fund X Net profit Y X2 Y2 XY
2007/08 17770.7 291.38 315796001.42 84902.30 5178012.00
2008/09 17529.3 271.64 307274605.56 73788.29 4761645.47
2009/010 16562.6 416.24 274320381.26 173255.74 6894024.95
2010/011 16745.5 455.31 280411100.43 207307.20 7624384.50
2011/012 17186.3 518.64 295369938.87 268987.45 8913518.19
2012/013 22330 635.3 498627560.20 403606.09 14186229.94
Total 108124.30 2588.51 1971799587.75 1211847.07 47557815.05
X= independent variable
Y= dependent variable
X= independent variable
Y= dependent variable
Appendix no:-37
Regression equation between net profits on total deposit of NIBL
Year Total deposit X Net profit Y X2 Y2 XY
2007/08 4574.51 69.7 20926141.74 4858.09 318843.35
2008/09 5466.6 85.35 29883715.56 7284.62 466574.31
2009/010 6694.96 94.18 44822489.40 8869.87 630531.33
2010/011 8063.9 143.57 65026483.21 20612.34 1157734.12
2011/012 10097.69 170.8 101963343.34 29172.64 1724685.45
2012/013 13802.44 237.38 190507349.95 56349.26 3276423.21
Total 48700.10 800.98 453129523.20 127146.83 7574791.77
X= independent variable
Y= dependent variable
Appendix no:-39
Regression equation between net profits on total deposit of BOK
Year Total deposit X Net profit Y X2 Y2 XY
2007/08 5713.49 65.36 32643967.98 4271.93 373433.71
2008/09 5723.29 9.28 32756048.42 86.12 53112.13
2009/010 6170.71 82.13 38077661.90 6745.34 506800.41
2010/011 7741.65 127.48 59933144.72 16251.15 986905.54
2011/012 8942.75 139.52 79972777.56 19465.83 1247692.48
2012/013 10485 202.44 109935225.00 40981.95 2122583.40
Total 44776.89 626.21 353318825.59 87802.32 5290527.67
X= independent variable
Y= dependent variable