MRU Physics Project
MRU Physics Project
SUMMARY
With this research work, we seek to determine that the speed of a bubble of negligible
mass when performing a uniform rectilinear movement has a constant speed. To do
this, we have taken into account a series of theories and formulas that allow us to
develop and generate an idea to base the practice of this project.
In mechanics , motion is a change in the position of a body over time with respect to a
reference system. The study of movement can be done through kinematics or through
dynamics. Depending on the choice of the reference system, the equations of motion
will be defined, equations that will determine the position and speed of the body at
each instant of time using the displacement equation.
For this project, the time that the bubble travels in the glass tube in sections was
analyzed and compared, obtaining a series of data that helped us determine the speed
at which it travels, using the least squares method we have determined the empirical
equation of the line:
t = (-0.015 ± 27.255 X)
We can also determine the speed of movement:
V OX = (0.036± 3.23 X 10 -5 ) m/s
Obtaining in this way a percentage error of E P = 0.089%
From this experiment we have concluded that the speed is constant, traveling equal
times over equal distances.
I. GOALS:
1.2 Determine the empirical equation that relates time as a function of distance.
In order to determine the laws that govern the various changes that bodies
experience as time passes, we must be able to describe those changes and
have some way of recording them. Without a doubt, the simplest change
that we observe in a body is the apparent change in its position with time
which we call movement. An example of movement can be the translation of
a bubble in a time and distance determined by the observer.
Table 1: Distance and time data for tabulation and representation of the curve
X(m) T(s)
x1 T1
x2 T2
x3 T3
… …
x 10 T 10
II.2.1. Speed: The movement of a body when the path is a straight line. Let
us consider that the OX axis of the figure coincides with the
trajectory. The position of the object is defined by its displacement
measured from an arbitrary point O, or origin. In principle,
displacement can be related to time by a functional relationship x =
f(t). Obviously x can be positive or negative, suppose that at time t
the object is in position A, with OA = x. Later at time t' he is at B,
where OB = x'. The average speed between A and B is defined by:
∆x
T b
x
E x x
t t
v v
'
x −x ∆ x
v= = (1)
'
t −t ∆t
lim ∆ x
v =∆lim
t →0
v= ∆t→0 (2)
∆t
But we know that this limit is the definition of the derivative of x with
respect to time, that is:
dx
v= (3)
dy
∫ dx=∫ v dt
xo ¿
x - x o = v (tt o )
x = x o + v (tt o ) (4)
This is how the equation of uniform rectilinear motion looks like. [1]
y = A + Bx (5)
[2]
From a statistical point of view, an implicit requirement for the least squares
method to work is that the errors of each measurement be randomly
distributed. It is also important that the data to be processed be well chosen, so
that they allow visibility in the variables that have to be resolved (to give more
weight to a particular data, see weighted least squares ).
(6)
(7)
Medium Error:
(9)
(10)
(11)
To achieve this objective, we use the fact that the function f must be
describable as a linear combination of a basis of functions. The
coefficients of the linear combination will be the parameters that we want
to determine. For example, suppose that f is a quadratic function , which
means that it is a linear combination, , of
functions , and (m=3 in this
case), and that the aim is to determine the values of the coefficients:
, so that they minimize the sum (S) of the squares of the
residuals:
(12)
This explains the name least squares. To the functions that multiply the
desired coefficients, which in this case are: , and They are known
as base functions of the approximation, and they can be any function.
For this general case, the formula for the best discrete approximation is
derived below (ie for a finite set of points), linear and according to the
criterion of the mean square error, which is the so-called linear least
squares approximation. It is possible to generate other types of
approximations, if the maximum or average errors are taken, for
example, but the difficulty involved in operating with them, due to the
absolute value of their expression, makes them difficult to treat and they
are almost not used.
If we take only two points to define the line, the result would have a
significant error. For a better estimate of the line and therefore of the
magnitudes sought, the “n” measurements taken should be used.
e 1 =y 1 -(ax 1 +b)
e 2 =y 2 -(ax 2 +b)
...................
e i =y i -(ax i +b)
.................. e n =y n -(ax n +b)
E(a,b)=(y 1 -ax 1 -b) 2 +(y 2 -ax 2 -b) 2 +...(y i -ax i -b) 2 +...+(y n -ax n -b) 2
(13)
(14)
(15)
More elaborate expressions allow us to
determine the error of “a”
(Derivative of “a”) and the error of b (Derivative of “b”). [4]
(16)
(17)
(18)
[4]
III.2. A cork that allows one free end of the tube to be covered.
IV. PROCEDURE:
4.1 We acquired some of our materials and adapted it according to what our
experiment required, the missing materials and equipment were borrowed
from the physics laboratory.
4.2 We delimit the total distance of the tube with a length of one meter and
subdivide it into 10 parts with distances equal to 10 cm, then we take
extreme points of the total length A and B
4.4 Our glass tube was filled with water leaving a small bubble.
4.6 We begin data collection by setting point A, from that point we measure the
time (10 times) in which the bubble takes to travel an initial section of 0.1 m;
We carry out the same procedure for the sections of 0.2 m, 0.3 m, 0.4 m, 0.5
m, 0.6 m, 0.7 m, 0.8 m, 0.9 m, 1 m.
4.7 Once the data collection has been completed, we have found the average
values of the time the bubble travels in each section.
V. ANALYSIS OF DATA
t 10
d t 1 (s) t 2 (s) t 3 (s) t 4 (s) t 5 (s) t 6 (s) t 7 (s) t 8 (s) t 9 (s) tP (s)
(s)
0.1 2.72 2.73 2.74 2.73 2.75 2.76 2.72 2.74 2.71 2.77 2.724
0.2 5.34 5.31 5.34 5.36 5.34 5.37 5.31 5.31 5.37 5.38 5.414
0.3 8.14 8.16 8.11 8.18 8.15 8.17 8.14 8.17 8.16 8.15 8.173
10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8
0.4 10.86 10.83 10.85 10.83 10.85 10.85 10.882
4 1 7 3
13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6
0.5 13.64 13.61 13.62 13.64 13.66 13.65 13.625
3 3 1 4
16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3
0.6 16.35 16.35 16.36 16.37 16.34 16.37 16.340
4 3 4 6
19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
0.7 19.05 19.06 19.07 19.09 19.04 19.01 19.062
4 2 9 7
21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7
0.8 21.71 21.76 21.76 21.73 21.75 21.79 21.743
2 5 8 6
24.5 24.5 24.5 24.5
0.9 24.55 24.55 24.57 24.56 24.53 24.52 24.546
4 2 9 9
27.2 27.2 27.2 27.2
1.0 27.24 27.25 27.27 27.25 27.27 27.27 27.245
5 1 3 4
TABLE II: Experimental data of distance and time and calculations for
Determine the speed of the bubble.
For A =
(∑❑ X j )−¿¿
❑
2
N
∴A = -0.015 s
N ( ∑ X j Y j )−(∑ X j) ( ∑Y j )
B=
(∑❑ X j )−(∑❑ X j )
❑ ❑
2 2
N
∴B = 27.255 s/m
5.2 We find the dispersion of the points around the regression line, which is
given by:
s
( )
( δ Y j ) =Y j ( s )−B m X j ( m) −A ( s)
5.3 Once the dispersion of the points around the line has been obtained, we
proceed to find the standard deviation of these differences:
S y =❑
√ N −2
=
√
δY 2 j ❑ ∑ (Y j−BX j− A)2
N −2
Sy=
√
❑ (41.1925 x 10−4 s2 )
8
S y = 0.0226 s
5.4 Let's calculate the uncertainties in the slope and the intercept:
√(
N
❑
) (∑❑ X j )
∆B = S and ❑
2
❑
2
N ∑ Xj −
❑
∆B = 0.022 sx ❑
√ 10
10 ( 3.85 m )−¿ ¿
∴ ∆B = 0.024 s/m
2
¿
√
❑
2
∑ Xj
∆A = S and❑ ❑
( ) (∑ X )
❑ ❑
2 2
N ∑ Xj −
❑ ❑
j
∆A = 0.022 sx ❑
√ 3.85 m2
10 ( 3.85 m2 )−(5.5 m)2
∴ ∆A = 0.015 s
√
2
S Vox =❑ ( ∂ Vox ) . S2B . . . . . . . . . . (1)
∂B
❑ 1
We know that: S B =∆ B = 0.024 and as: B =
Vox
∂ Vox −1
So: = = 1.346 x 10 -3 m 2 /s 2
∂ B B2
Substituting into (1) we have:
√
2
S Vox =❑ ( ∂ Vox ) . S2B
∂B
X = X O + ( V ox )t
1
t =( )x
V ox
V OX = (V OX + SVox ) m/s
∴ V OX = (0.036 + 3.23 X 10 -5 ) m/s
−5
3.23 x 10
I%=( ) 100%
0.036
∴I % = 0.089%
20
15
10
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
DISTANCIA (m)
Figure 6
VI. RESULTS:
6.1 Intercept A:
Faculty of Civil Engineering Page 17
PHYSICS I – Uniform Rectilinear Motion
A = ( - 0.15± 0.015) m
6.2 Slope B:
t = (-0.015 ± 27.255X)
I% = 0.089%
7.1 The project we have carried out has allowed us to learn to apply the
least squares method in the analysis of our data.
7.2 The work team recommends the use of a graphing machine to check the
graphic method used so that the intercept and slope have the lowest
possible error.
7.5 It is recommended that after filling the liquid inside the tube it be closed
so as to prevent the passage of air inside, otherwise the size of the
bubble will be altered, causing the variation in velocity.
7.6 To determine the veracity of our results, we have found the speed by the
theoretical method, taking a distance at a certain time from Table I, our speed
being constant and equal to the value of the statistical method.
∆x = ∆tv
∆x
V=
∆t
1m
V=
27.245 s
V = 0.036 m/s
VIII. CONCLUSIONS:
8.1 The statistical or analytical method is much more reliable than the graph
since it presents the experimental data with greater accuracy and less
margin of error.
8.2 We have used graphical and statistical methods since they have allowed
us to find the intercept, the slope and the uncertainty.
8.3 The application of the least squares method in laboratory practices and
projects is very important since it allows us to determine the fit line with
the data obtained.
x. ANNEXES
Data collection: