Whitepaper - Collaborate Science - Key Principles For Project Based Learning
Whitepaper - Collaborate Science - Key Principles For Project Based Learning
Project-
Based
Learning
An Inquiry-
Based
Educational
Approach
Key Principles
for Project-Based
Learning
Research confirms
that rigorous project-
based learning has a
positive impact on
students, leading to
increased achievement
and higher levels of
motivation.
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive summary 2
Summary 22
Acknowledgments 22
References 23
project-based learning?
Project-based learning (PBL) is an inquiry-based project-based learning had a medium to large positive
educational approach in which students explore effect on students’ academic achievement compared
real-world problems through individual and group with traditional instruction (Chen & Yang, 2019). And in
projects. This teaching and learning method a study in four countries in South and Central America,
encourages students to make sense of why researchers reported that inquiry and problem-based
content is useful and how it might be applied. learning improved students’ math and science scores
Projects involve complex tasks organized around a on standardized tests (Bando et al., 2018).
challenging central question, resulting in reflection,
iteration, and the creation of a final public product.
The projects are anchored in core subject-matter
content, allowing students to build knowledge in
A recent meta-analysis of PBL
those important areas and develop strong problem- research, looking at journal articles
solving, critical-thinking, and collaboration skills. When
published over a 20-year period,
integrated into the school day, PBL can be deeply
engaging and effective as compared with traditional, found project-based learning
teacher-centered instructional approaches. No single
had a medium to large positive
education lever can transform our education system,
but PBL is a tool that can create a more student- effect on students’ academic
centered learning environment that improves outcomes. achievement compared with
Research confirms that rigorous project-based
learning has a positive impact on students, leading to traditional instruction.
increased achievement and higher levels of motivation
(Larmer et al., 2015). Recent studies, discussed in
greater detail below, have found that PBL is connected As with many educational efforts, however, not all
to learning gains in an array of academic subjects. PBL is equal. The MDRC review found what an earlier
In a broad review of published research, MDRC, landscape analysis stated—that the field hadn’t come
a social-policy research organization, highlighted together around clear PBL design principles and further
numerous studies finding positive associations between research was needed. Lucas Education Research (LER),
PBL and students’ development of knowledge and a division of the George Lucas Educational Foundation
cognitive skills (Condliffe et al., 2017). The MDRC review (GLEF), has been supporting independent research
pointed to findings from the American Institutes for studies to help identify what generates rigorous and
Research that showed higher scores on the OECD effective PBL and what drives learning gains and other
PISA-Based Test for Schools, an international academic positive student outcomes. The studies have produced
assessment given to 15-year-olds, and higher on-time evidence of what works, and LER continues to invest in
high school graduation rates in schools that were part gold-standard research that can yield further insights and
of the deeper learning network as compared with help improve teaching and learning. PBL practice should
schools that taught with more-traditional instructional not be isolated from research. Doing it well requires
practices. The network schools in the study were part a commitment to evidence-based practices. Recent
of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation’s deeper research findings support a set of project-based
learning community of practice and used project-based learning design principles that ensure PBL is rigorous
learning (Zeiser et al., 2016). and will benefit students. This report, an update on a
A recent meta-analysis of PBL research, looking at 2015 paper, outlines those design principles and lays out
journal articles published over a 20-year period, found the latest and most robust research underpinning them.
standing of what constitutes rigorous PBL can help (Lucas Education Research, 2015). The majority of those
alleviate challenges in designing and implementing same teachers said that using PBL with their students
projects. While teachers overwhelmingly support would have a positive impact on student learning.
PBL, they often identify obstacles to using it with Teachers reported that obstacles to implementing
their students. For example, in a survey of AP U.S. PBL included a lack of access to resources; a lack
Government and Politics and AP Environmental of planning and instructional time; and the need for
Science teachers, 70 percent reported that it was hard meaningful, sustained professional learning.
Identifying core design principles of rigorous PBL 3. Meaningful and supportive relationships
can inform instruction, curriculum development, Meaningful and supportive relationships matter
and professional learning and promote equitable in education generally and definitely with project-
opportunities for learning. The four key design based learning. Schools with a strong culture of
principles detailed in this report underpin good PBL collaboration and that reward risk taking, view
instruction, and the research is clear that project- mistakes as learning opportunities, and emphasize
based learning must incorporate the following: students’ social and emotional learning skills foster
rich PBL environments. Quality PBL benefits from
1. Purposeful and authentic experiences collaborative peer-to-peer interactions and trusting
Effective PBL requires purposeful and authentic student-teacher relationships.
experiences generated by students engaging in
relevant questions. A main question should drive a 4. Evidence-based teaching and
unit of study, and that question should be feasible assessment practices
to consider, worthwhile, contextualized, meaningful, Learning from research and relying on evidence
and ethical (Krajcik & Shin, 2014). about what works is essential. This report looks at
PBL-related studies and highlights evidence-based
These questions should be related to students’ teaching and assessment practices that can have a
lives, the communities in which young people positive effect on student outcomes. Some of these
reside, and real-world issues happening outside the practices include providing feedback to students in
classroom. For example, projects might address a strategic and timely manner, creating opportunities
questions such as how to design a new park that for reflection, and empowering students to share
supports local plant life, build affordable housing, their learning with others. There is still much to learn,
or solve a public-health problem. Projects should but research has led to a lot of information about
be coherently sequenced and use tools, practices, the practices that benefit PBL instruction. When
and standards relied upon in real-world settings. educators are supported in using these approaches—
through professional-learning opportunities,
2. Deep integration with course content collaborative teaching environments, and quality
Projects should feature deep integration with resources—they can feel confident in their ability
course content and be rooted in core subject to bring rigorous PBL into their classrooms.
areas, helping to deepen and build student
knowledge of important topics. The multi-
dimensional nature of PBL makes it a strong This paper describes each design principle, as
approach for interdisciplinary learning, so projects well as the supporting research, in further detail
can simultaneously build student understanding below. Taken together, these four design principles
of math concepts, scientific phenomenon, and provide a framework for how to develop, execute,
improve literacy skills, for example. and scale project-based learning that can transform
education in the United States and globally.
1
Purposeful
and authentic
experiences
1 2
Students take on the role of NASA engineers in charge of
the entry, descent, and landing of a Mars rover. They are
tasked with designing and testing a model of the lander
structure on the Mars rover.
4
3 Students develop understanding of core physics concepts, including air
resistance and velocity, as they prototype the parachute of the lander.
The iterations of testing promote deep engagement in physics practices.
5 6
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING 6
KNOWLEDGE IN ACTION
continued
7 8
9
Students consider concepts of energy and go deeper
on topics introduced in prior units. They use their
developing understanding of physics to recommend
a design for the heat shield of the lander.
10
12
Real engineers visit the classroom to provide feedback to
2
Deep
integration
with course
content
A Proposal to
Improve a Local Park
KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES
2
Students discuss their observations and identify
problems at the park that they want to help solve.
The class creates a survey to discover how their
community feels about the problem.
3 4
6
Through reading and discussions, students
learn about the purposes of government and
continued
7 8
9
Students write a proposal to improve the
park based on their survey data and what
they have discovered about civics and
government, gaining key writing skills.
10
12
Students create and deliver a persuasive public
3
Meaningful
and supportive
relationships
2
Students draw upon their funds of knowledge and
6
Groups of students work together to design, build,
continued
7 8
10
Students draw models as a way to explain their
understanding with opportunities to revise,
11
Students consider how forces affect their toy design
and its acceleration. They gain evidence to support
their scientific claims and then present a final model
of their toys.
12
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING 15
In an observation of the Project PLACE program earthquake in Mexico. She described to her peers the
KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES
geared to second graders in Michigan, teachers were sadness her mother had felt seeing her childhood
seen encouraging meaningful student-to-student home destroyed, and her peers asked empathetic
conversations and empowering the children to work and relevant questions, demonstrating the caring and
in groups and come up with and present shared ideas compassionate dialogue expected in a classroom using
to improve an area park and playground. strong PBL instruction.
Other components of social and emotional learning Family engagement is also critical, and community
that help make PBL successful include the development knowledge can be tapped to strengthen academic
of empathy in students and the ability to consider other experiences. Families and larger communities are
people’s perspectives. For instance, in one ML-PBL important contexts and contain interconnected networks
classroom, students were observed engaging in lively where learning occurs, and classroom learning is
and respectful conversations about earthquakes. One enhanced when there is space to develop and exchange
child shared that her mother had lived through a major diverse “funds of knowledge” (Gonzalez et al., 2001).
The Sprocket platform allows researchers to share PBL curriculum with teachers. Teachers can
use Sprocket to navigate the units of the ML-PBL Curriculum, shown here. The tool highlights
disciplinary standards and key ideas of social and emotional learning to support teachers with
instruction and relationship building. The platform also allows teachers to share adaptations
they make with other teachers, allowing for peer collaboration.
4
Evidence-based
teaching and
assessment
practices Photo: Brightworks
which allows them to acquire a deeper understanding researchers partnered with San Francisco Unified
of the content and the ability to apply their knowledge School District teachers and leaders to consider how
to complete the project. to best support teachers in using NGSS-aligned PBL
The integration of the project throughout the curriculum and evidence-based instructional practices
learning process fosters group and individual in their classrooms. They developed a comprehensive
accountability and encourages students to create model of professional learning that includes the training
products that provide teachers with evidence of of site-based teacher-leaders. When educators have
their learning. Individual science tasks build up to the opportunity to engage in professional-learning
a culminating project. For example, in a unit on the communities and share samples of student work and
thermal dynamics of heat transfer, students design, videos of teaching and learning, they can discuss
build, and test a device that measures the way that students’ understanding of key concepts and share
thermal energy transfers between and within systems. instructional practices with other teachers.
During each task, students use a project organizer to PBL is most viable when it features this kind of
capture pieces of evidence that will inform their final high-quality and sustained professional learning. In
project and serve as formative assessments. This allows the American Institutes of Research study, school
teachers to monitor students’ progress and address administrators and teachers interviewed cited teacher
content misunderstandings. collaboration and professional community as important
to facilitating their ability to teach PBL (Huberman
et al., 2016).
Learning Through Performance provides teachers with rubrics to evaluate the final performance assessment of
student projects. This rubric, from a unit in which sixth-grade students write a patent application for a device
they design that maximizes or minimizes thermal energy transfer, is given to students at the beginning of the
unit, which provides clear expectations that students should be able to accomplish in the final product aligned
to the Disciplinary Core Ideas from the Next Generation Science Standards. The Disciplinary Core Ideas in the
chart above are reproduced verbatim from A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting
Concepts, and Core Ideas by the National Research Council.
Constructing a
Thermal Device
KEY DESIGN PRINCIPLES
2
In this project, students take on the role of
3 4
5
Students work together to investigate and make
sense of the science ideas needed as they work
to design their device. Teachers assess student
progress throughout their design.
6
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING 20
LEARNING THROUGH PERFORMANCE
continued
7 8
10
9 The course scaffolds how students work as a group
and sets explicit “group work” norms and roles that
are used throughout the project.
11
Students work collaboratively on a group design
of the device, experiencing an authentic engineering
design process. Individually, each student writes
a patent application for the device showcasing
understanding of science ideas.
12
KEY PRINCIPLES FOR PROJECT-BASED LEARNING 21
Summary and achievement on state tests, including substantial
SUMMARY
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This paper was originally produced LER grantees provided additional of Michigan State University, Joseph
by AnnMarie Baines and Angela guidance with the writing and Krajcik of Michigan State University,
DeBarger with contributions from reviewing of the paper. They include Emily Miller of the University of
Kristin De Vivo, Nathan Warner, Alison Boardman of the University of Wisconsin, Annemarie Palincsar of
Sheree Santos, and Jordan Brinkman. Colorado, Nell Duke of the University the University of Michigan, Joseph
of Michigan, Miranda Fitzgerald of Polman of the University of Colorado,
This updated version was produced
the University of North Carolina, and Christopher Pupik Dean of the
with contributions from Kristin De
Pam Grossman of the University of University of Pennsylvania.
Vivo, Denis Udall, Nancy Zuckerbrod,
Pennsylvania, Anne-Lise Halvorsen
Kate Felsen, and Rochelle Urban.
Bando, R., Näslund-Hadley, E., & Gertier, P. Gonzalez, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, Lucas Education Research. (2015). AP
(2018). Inquiry and problem-based peda- L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed teacher perspectives on project-based
gogy: Evidence from 10 field experiments. knowledge: Creating zones of practices learning in the Knowledge in Action
Inter-American Development Bank. in mathematics . Journal of Education for curriculum: Key findings from teacher
Students Placed at Risk, 6(1–2), 115–132. survey study .
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W.,
Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. Grossman, P., Pupik Dean, C. G., Schneider Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014).
(1991). Motivating project-based learning: Kavanagh, S., & Hermann, Z. (2019). Universal design for learning: Theory and
Sustaining the doing, supporting the Preparing teachers for project-based practice. CAST Professional Publishing.
learning . Educational Psychologist, teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(7), 43–48.
26(3–4), 369–398. Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting
Halvorsen, A., Duke, N. K., Brugar, K. A., deep learning through project-based
Boardman, A. G., Garcia, A., Dalton, B., & Block, M. K., Strachan, S. L., Berka, M. B., learning: A design problem . Disciplinary
Polman, J. L. (2020). Compose our world: & Brown, J. M. (2012). Narrowing the and Interdisciplinary Science Education
Project-based learning in secondary English achievement gap in second-grade social Research, 1(7).
language arts. Teachers College Press. studies and content area literacy: The
promise of a project-based approach. National Academies of Sciences,
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, Theory and Research in Social Education, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). How
P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., & 40(3), 198–229. people learn II: Learners, contexts, and
Zimmerman, T. (2008). Powerful learning: cultures . The National Academies Press.
What we know about teaching for under- Holthuis, N., Deutscher, R., Schultz, S.,
standing. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. & Jamshidi, A. (2018). The new NGSS O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007).
classroom: A curriculum framework The impact of science knowledge,
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting for project-based science learning. reading skill, and reading strategy knowl-
the effects of project-based learning American Educator, 42(2), 23–27. edge on more traditional “high stakes”
on students’ academic achievement: measures of high school students’ science
A meta-analysis investigating moderators . Huberman, M., Bitter, C., Anthony, J., & achievement . American Educational
Educational Research Review, 26(1), 71–81. O’Day, J. (2014). The shape of deeper Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196.
learning: Strategies, structures, and cultures
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working in deeper learning network high schools. Parker, W. C., & Lo, J. (2016). Reinventing
for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: American Institutes for Research. the high school government course:
Sociological theory in practice. Teachers Rigor, simulations, and learning from text .
College Press. Huberman, M., Duffy, H., Mason, J., Zeiser, Democracy and Education, 24 (1).
K., & O’Day, J. (2016). School features
Condliffe, B., Quint, J., Visher, M., Bangser, and student opportunities for deeper Polman, J. L., Stamatis, K., Boardman,
M., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., & Nelson, E. learning: What makes a difference? A. G., & Garcia, A. (2018). Authentic to
(2017). Project-based learning: A literature American Institutes for Research. whom and what? The role of authenticity
review. MDRC. in project-based learning in English
Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. (2013). Teaching language arts. In J. Kay & R. Luckin (Eds.),
Duke, N. K., Halvorsen, A., Strachan, S. L., science in elementary and middle school Rethinking learning in the digital age:
Kim, J., & Konstantopoulous, S. (2020). classrooms: A project-based approach Making the learning sciences count, 13th
Putting PjBL to the test: The impact of (4th ed.). Routledge. International Conference of the Learning
project-based learning on second graders’ Sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 2 (pp. 1669–
social studies and literacy learning and Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project- 1670). International Society of the Learning
motivation in low-SES school settings . based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Sciences .
American Educational Research Journal. The Cambridge handbook of the learning
sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 275–297). Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of
Fitzgerald, M. (2020). Overlapping oppor- Cambridge University Press. research on project-based learning.
tunities for social-emotional and literacy Autodesk Foundation.
learning in elementary-grade project-based Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J. R., & Boss, S.
instruction. American Journal of Education. (2015). Setting the standard for project- Zeiser, K. L., Mills, N., Wulach, S., & Garet, M.
based learning: A proven approach to S. (2016). Graduation advantage persists for
Garcia, A., Guggenheim, A., Stamatis, K., rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD. students in deeper learning network high
& Dalton, B. (2020). Glimmers of care: schools—Updated findings from the study
Attending to the affective everyday in of deeper learning: Opportunities and
ninth-grade literacy classrooms . outcomes. American Institutes for Research.
Reading Research Quarterly.
Founded in 2013, Lucas Education Research operates as a division of the George Lucas Educational
Foundation, a nonprofit operating foundation established by filmmaker George Lucas in 1991. Our
work focuses on the design and evaluation of innovative practices in K–12 schools, including many
of the core strategies described by Edutopia, another division of GLEF.