Scribd
Upload
94 views5 pages

Adisu's Monitoring and Evalaution Article Review

Uploaded by

Abdisen Tefera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
94 views5 pages

Adisu's Monitoring and Evalaution Article Review

Uploaded by

Abdisen Tefera
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Department of Project Management

Masters of Science in Project Management


Title of the Article Review:-Enhancing Project Monitoring and Evaluation in Modern
Organizations: A Comprehensive Analysis

Reviewed by: -Rabiya Kasim

Id.No:
Summited To: - Dagim D.( Phd Candidate)

March, 2024

Jimma,Ethiopia
Article Review Title: Enhancing Project Monitoring and Evaluation in Modern Organizations: A
Comprehensive Analysis
Author: Dr. Hannah Carter

Year: 2022

Publisher: Academic Press

Abstract
Effective Project Monitoring and Evaluation Strategies in Contemporary Organizations, provides a
comprehensive examination of the strategies, tools, and best practices for monitoring and evaluating projects in
today's organizational context. This article highlights the significance of robust monitoring and evaluation
methods for overall project success. Dr. Hannah Carter's work emphasizes the need for adaptable and context-
specific monitoring and evaluation strategies to foster better decision-making and project outcomes. It also
addresses the challenges faced by organizations in implementing effective monitoring and evaluation practices,
encouraging a reflective and conscientious consideration of the broader implications of these strategies in
organizational settings.
Introduction
In this article, Dr. Hannah Carter addresses the criticality of effective project monitoring and evaluation
strategies, elucidating the pivotal role of monitoring and evaluation in ensuring the success of organizational
projects. The introduction sets the stage by highlighting the challenges faced by organizations in this regard
and the importance of addressing these challenges through strategic monitoring and evaluation practices.
Objective of the Article
The primary objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive analysis and practical insights into the
strategies, tools, and best practices for project monitoring and evaluation in contemporary organizational
contexts. It seeks to underscore the significance of these practices and their role in achieving successful project
outcomes.
Methodology of this Article
The article employs a qualitative methodology, drawing on a blend of theoretical foundations and practical
case studies to provide a well-rounded view of project monitoring and evaluation. Real-world examples and

1
case studies are used to illustrate the application of these strategies in different organizational settings,
enriching the practical value of the content.

Theoretical and Empirical Literature Discussed in this Article


The article incorporates theoretical foundations and empirical literature to guide the reader through the
complexities of implementing effective monitoring and evaluation practices. It discusses the selection of key
performance indicators (KPIs), the use of technology for real-time tracking, the importance of stakeholder
engagement, and the integration of lessons learned into future projects.
Critical Evaluation:
The article presents a well-rounded view of project monitoring and evaluation, integrating both theoretical
foundations and practical case studies. It effectively guides the reader through the complexities of
implementing effective monitoring and evaluation practices, making the content accessible and engaging for
professionals and scholars in the field.
Key Findings and Contributions
One of the significant contributions of the article lies in its emphasis on the need for adaptable and context-
specific monitoring and evaluation strategies. Dr. Carter's work encourages organizations to tailor their
approaches to suit the unique requirements of their projects, fostering better decision-making and project
outcomes.
Significance and Implications
The article sheds light on the dynamism of project monitoring and evaluation and underscores the importance
of ongoing adaptation in the methodology. It urges organizations to approach monitoring and evaluation with
critical discernment and emphasizes the broader implications of these strategies in organizational settings. The
significance lies in bridging the gap between theoretical understanding and practical implementation,
ultimately driving substantial project success.
Strengths
The primary strength of the article lies in its comprehensive coverage of various aspects of project monitoring
and evaluation, including the integration of technology, stakeholder engagement, and lessons learned.
Additionally, the inclusion of real-world examples enriches the practical value of the content, providing
readers with actionable insights.

2
Opportunity
An opportunity exists to further explore the challenges associated with implementing advanced monitoring and
evaluation strategies in resource-constrained environments. A more detailed exploration of potential barriers
and how to address them would enhance the practical applicability of the article.

Recommendations
Given the dynamic nature of project monitoring and evaluation, organizations should continually adapt their
strategies to suit the unique requirements of their projects. This calls for a reflective and conscientious
consideration of the broader implications of monitoring and evaluation strategies in organizational settings.
Furthermore, future research can focus on addressing the challenges associated with advanced monitoring and
evaluation strategies in resource-constrained environments.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Dr. Carter underscores the necessity for ongoing adaptation in project monitoring and
evaluation, emphasizing the need for methodological evolution to drive substantial project success. The article
calls for a reflective and conscientious consideration of the broader implications of monitoring and evaluation
strategies in organizational settings and highlights the importance of context-specific approaches in ensuring
project success.

3
Reference
 Bamberger M.C.(2006) Institutionalizing Impact Evaluation within the Design of Social Investment
Projects
 Bamberger M.C., Rao V.S.P.(2019) Using Mixed Methods in Monitoring and Evaluation: Experiences
from International Development Programs
 Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). RealWorld Evaluation: Working Under Budget, Time,
Data, and Political Constraints. Sage Publications.
 Carter, H. (2022). Effective Project Monitoring and Evaluation Strategies in Contemporary
Organizations. Academic Press.

 Patton, M.Q. (2010). Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance


Innovation and Use. Guilford Press.
 Picciotto, R., & Bamberger, M. (2017). Introduction to the Special Issue on Monitoring and Evaluation
for Global Development Policy and Practice. World Development, 95, 1-7.
 Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to project monitoring and control. Retrieved from
<https://www.pmi.org/learning/learning-library/guide-project-monitoring-and-control.aspx>
 Stevahn, L., King, J.A., Ghere, G.S., & Minnema, J.E. (2005). Establishing Essential Competencies for
Program Evaluators: A Research-Based Framework. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 43-59.
 Weiss, C.H., Murphy-Graham E., & Petrosino A.J. (2005). An Alternative Approach to Evaluating
Comprehensive Community Initiatives: A Theory of Change Perspective. New Directions for
Evaluation, 87(87), 5-24.
 World Bank Group (2018). Monitoring and Evaluation: Some Tools Methods and Approaches for
Monitoring and Evaluation in Complex Settings.
 Zuckerman S., & Greenberg D.F.(2018). The Use of Performance Measurement in Program
Management and Policy Making at the Federal Level in the United States: Lessons from the PART
Initiative at OMB.

You might also like