Module-03 RM & Ipr
Module-03 RM & Ipr
Module-3
Sampling: Concepts, Types of Sampling, Probability Sampling: simple random sampling,
systematic sampling, stratified random sampling, cluster sampling,
Non Probability Sampling: convenience sampling- judgmental sampling, snowball sampling,
quota sampling, Errors in sampling.
Sampling: Concepts
What is Sampling?
Sampling is a process in which the fixed numbers of observations are taken randomly from a larger
population. A technique which is fundamental for behavioral research is known as sampling and
without using it, research work is not possible. It is impracticable and Impossible to study the
whole population due to practical limitations of cost, time and other factors that are indispensable
and operative in studying the whole population. For the sole reason of making the research findings
economical and accurate, the concept of sampling has been introduced.
For example, for taking decision about to purchase or not to purchase the fruits, a fruit merchant
inspects randomly only a few of them rather than examining each and every fruit. The important
objective of sampling is to obtain maximum information of the population under study using
minimum of money. labour and time.
Sampling in Research:
A definite plan to obtain a sample from the sampling frame is sample design. The method or
technique which is adopted by the researcher in selecting the units of sampling from the population
is called sampling design.
The basis for selecting a sample survey is the framework or road-map which is called sample
design and it affects other important aspects of the survey. For obtaining some type of relevant
information using survey. researchers execute it for some population, or universe. The sampling
frame must be defined in such a way that it represents the population of interest out of which a
sample is to be drawn at random. This sampling frame should be either identical to the population
or may be a part of it. The sampling frame can be indirectly related to the population subject to
some under coverage (e.g., the population is preschool children and the frame is a listing of
preschools). The design of the sample may be simple or complex which provides the fundamental
plan and methodology for the selection of the sample.
Definition of Sampling
According to Cocharn :
"In every branch of science we lack the resources, to study more than a fragment of the phenomena
that might advance our knowledge". In this definition a fragment is the sample and phenomena is
the population.
i) Finite Universe :
A 'finite universe' comprises of finite number of entities or members. For example, the universe of
the heights of students in a particular class.
2) Statistical Population :
To draw out statistical inferences from the set of entities of statistical population is based on
random sampling of the population. For example, to derive generalizations about the crows, to
only the set of crows should be the interest of study. However, if one chooses a population such
as 'all crows', then the limitations will be in observing crows both the existing as well as existing
in the future. There will be additional limitations of geography where the resources are limited for
studying crows.
The total of quantities that are measurable or set of numbers is 'statistical population'. Thus, when
only a single character symbolized every element of such a set then it is defined as 'single
population', c.g., income of individuals. Depending on the finite and infinite number of elements,
statistical population can be infinite as well as finite. A random set may not be a statistical
population.
For example, a set of crows at a point of time will not represent a statistical population.
3) Sample :
A part of the population which is examined to estimate the characteristics of the population is
called a sample.
For example,
A portion of rice is examined to assess the quality of rice in the bag where the portion of rice
examined is the sample and the bag of rice is the population.
From a large consignment, proportion of defective articles is estimated only from a portion of the
consignment. The selected portion is called sample.
4) Census:
When in a research every item or entity of the universe is included, that approach is called "census".
In this method, detailed information regarding every population unit is collected. It is also called
complete enumeration. This method provides more accuracy in the results in comparison to the
sampling method.
For example, population survey about various issues, such as, literacy, education, income, etc.,
include all the items of the population.
5) Sampling Frame:
The actual set of units and a list containing every member of the population from which a sample
is drawn at random is called sample frame.
For example, if one wants to know the factors that are responsible for the patients being admitted
in the hospital after an acute attack of asthma in a specified area, then it becomes necessary to
know the names of all those people of that particular area being admitted into the hospital for that
reason.
6) Sample Unit :
Every sample is made up of several members or components. These members or components are
called "sampling units". A sampling unit may or may not be a sampling element. Generally
sampling unit is referred as sampling element. But in case of sampling units consisting of several
population units, each sampling unit is called a cluster of units. The individual population units
which come under the cluster of units, are called sampling elements. Therefore in this case a
sampling element is an individual object on which the research is done, and it is a component of
sampling unit.
For example, in case of inspecting the quality of oranges, only few oranges are selected to
examine and each selected orange is a sampling unit. But in case of finding, the literacy level of a
particular colony, several houses are selected in that colony for research. These houses are
sampling units. However the individual members of each house are approached for examining the
literacy level, thus these individual members of several houses are sampling elements.
7) Sample Design :
Designing a plan for effectively drawing out a sample from the sampling frame is called 'sample
design'. In this different tools or techniques are used by researchers for drawing sampling units
from the sampling frame.
1) True Representative : The true representative of the population and matching its properties is
termed as good sample where aggregate of certain properties is the population and sample is the
sub-total of the universe.
2) Free from Bias : A good sample does not allows prejudices, pre-conceptions, and imaginations
which affects its choice and it is unbiased.
3) Accurate : A sample is called good when it yields accurate estimates or statistics and free from
errors.
4) Comprehensive :A sample that is true representative of the population is also comprehensive
in nature which is controlled by definite purpose of investigation. A sample's characteristic may
be comprehensive but it may not be a good representative of the population.
5) Approachable : The subjects of good sample are easily accessible where the tools of research
are easily conducted and easy collection of data possible.
6) Good Size :The size of good sample is such that it yields an accurate result and the error due to
probability can be estimated.
7) Feasible : A good sample creates the research work more feasible.
8) Goal Orientation : Any sample which is selected by the researcher should be able to satisfy
the objectives of the research. The sample should be taken in proper number. It should be
customized to fit the environment under which the research is going to be conducted. If the sample
is changed as per the requirement of the survey design then it can come out with better results and
outcomes.
9) Practical : It means that the concepts of sample selection should be applied property while
conducting the research. The researcher should be well experienced and well instructed. The
instructions which are passed to observer should be clear, complete and correct in all terms so as
to avoid errors and biasness on their part. The sample should be selected on basis of the sample
design. The sampling units should be representative. The sample design should be practical and
feasible in nature.
10) Economical : It refers that the research should not incur huge cost, time or efforts. One of the
objectives of any research is to complete the research with minimum effort, time, money and
resources. The researcher calculates per unit cost for each respondent. The researcher should
choose that sampling design which gives minimum per respondent cost and maximum accuracy.
The funding agency is highly concerned with per unit cost and the corresponding accuracy.
Procedure of Sampling
A brief description of which measurements will be taken at what times, on which material, in what
manner, and by whom, is termed as 'sampling plan'. The designing of the sampling plans should
incorporate that data to be evaluated which is a representative sample of the parameters of interest
and be answerable to all the questions as stated in the goals. Following are the steps involved
in sampling procedure in research or developing a sampling plan :
1) Define the Universe : The universe can be restricted to some geographical limits, a particular
type of product or some other constraints. Defining the universe is the initial problem procedures
of sampling. The collection of elements or objects possessing information desired by the researcher
regarding what inferences are to be made is termed as the target population or the universe. Precise
definition of the target population is must as ambiguous definition will result in ineffective
research and deceptive in meaning. Proper defining of the target population requires translating
the problem definition precisely as what should and should not be included in the sample. The
description of the target population should be on the basis of elements, sampling units, the period
and time. Thus, in survey research element is like an object from which or about information is
required. In which survey research, the elements are usually the respondents.
For example, consider a marketing research project in which researcher wants to take response of
the consumer for a new brand of men's perfume. It has to decide that who should be included in
the target population. It is the important question all the men included in the research or the men
who used the perfume during the last month or men who are 17 years of age, or older. Should
females be included, because some women buy colognes for their husbands?. Appropriate
description of target population requires prior resolution of such types of questions.
2) Sample Frame : The frame is enlisted by some population that already exists or it is
constructed for some study to be conducted by the researcher. After the specification of the
population to be studied, the frame of the population is developed. Sampling frame consists of all
the sampling units of the population which is built by the researcher for the subject of his study or
it consists of already existing list of the population. This frame does not consist of names only but
it may include a permanent location, a boundary. an address, or the set of certain rules that
describes a sampling unit.
A set of boundaries which is restricting the universe is termed as a frame that may be in the form
of lists, indices, maps, directories, population records, electoral rolls, city tax rolls, enrollment of
the students in an university, etc. This frame is very mandatory in marketing studies and every
element of the population enlisted appears only once which constitutes a sample frame. For a good
sampling frame it should be accurate, free from duplication, and conveniently available. For the
better performance of sampling procedure, sampling should be essential for marketing research.
The representation of the elements of the target populations sampling frame which consists of a
list to identify the target population.
For example, firms in industry that are enlisted in association directory, telephone book, a mailing
list purchased from a commercial organisation, a city directory, or a map.
3) Specifying the Sampling Units : A sampling unit is decided on the basis of the sampling frame
which is the primary unit containing the sampling elements of the population like, city blocks,
households, a business organisation, etc. The design of the project is the partial basis of the
selection of the sampling unit. The units that are served as initial sampling are called as primary
sampling units. The objective of the inquiry is the basis of the composition of one or more units of
the population.
For example, for the assessment of the consumer response to a new line of lipsticks, Lakme wants
to sample females who are over 18 years of age where it can be the possibility of sampling such
females directly and the sampling unit would be the same as an element. Otherwise, households
might be the sampling units which are sampled. All the females above 18 in the selected
households would be interviewed where the sampling unit differs from the population element.
The time period under consideration is the extent of the geographical boundaries and the time
factor.
4) Selection of Sample Design : The procedure of selecting units in the sample involves two
primary methods of sampling namely, probability and non-probability methods that can be further
sub divided into specific methods of selection. The probability sample being one and the procedure
involved in selecting the units has some specific chance of its inclusion in the sample. An arbitrary
method is adopted in selecting the units which is not depending upon the chance for the non
probability sample. The purpose of inquiry and the attitude or convenience of the investigators is
the basis of this method.
Two decisions are involved in the selection of the sample design:
To use probability or non-probability method of selection.
Specific sample design to use in collecting the data.
The following considerations affect the choice of the researcher :
Usage of the probability sampling for the evaluation of the sampling error.
Probability sample should be used for ensuring randomness in the selection of the units.
Non-probability sampling should be used in the absence of proper sample frame.
Non-probability sampling should be used when the considerations of time and money are
important.
To achieve the objectives of investigation in the best possible way sample design should be
selected after the decision of the method of selection whether probability or non-probability
method. Unconcerned about the design being chosen finally the researcher has to defend his design
at the time of the final presentation of the study results.
5) Determination of Sample Size : The desired degree of accuracy in investigation is directly
proportional to the size the sample which also depends upon the nature of the population and the
method of selection. The ideal samples size in marketing research investigations depends upon the
the type of series and the population size. There will be more degree of heterogeneity and larger
units s will be drawn in the sample due to larger size of the population. Hence the size of the
sample should be larger for being fully representative.
6) Select the Sample : Execution of the actual sampling process is called as selection of the sample
and the real selection of the elements of sample requiring considerable amount of office and field
work especially when the personal interviews are involved. Detailed specification of the sampling
design is the require is requirement for the execution of the sampling process with respect to the
implementation of the size of population, sampling frame, sampling unit, sampling technique and
sample size. Sampling units and sample size. being the household's requirement is the operational
definition of a household, procedure for those houses that are vacant and if nobody is at home then
the execution of the call backs is mandatory. For all the sampling design, decisions information
must be provided in detail.
Advantages of Sampling
The sample size for a research refers to the total number of elements of the population to be
included in the sample for conducting the research study. Both qualitative and quantitative points
are involved in specifying the size of the sample for the research study. The accuracy of research
depends on the size of the sample. It has been observed that a larger sample gives more accuracy
and estimate levels. Apart from it, the availability of money, resources and efforts also specify the
size of a sample.
The sample size of any research study is represented by 'n. If the population is highly
heterogeneous, then the sample will be divided into various groups with an indication that the
sample size would be larger. If the population is heterogeneous then the sample will be small.
Thus, at pre-assigned level there is a fixation of the sampling error and the standard error of the
statistic, thus having sample size as 'n' is chosen.
Factors Influencing Sample Size/ Sample Size Constraints
The following points should be taken care of while deciding the sample size :
1) Size of Universe : It has been observed and statistically proven that the sample size should be
large so that it can represent the whole target population If the universe size is large and
heterogeneous then the researcher should take large sample size and vice versa.
2) Availability of Resources : The researcher needs a lot of resources to complete the task of
research. These resources bind the researcher. It means that the researcher has to complete the
research within those allotted resources. Resources can be money, time, experts or any other
variable. If the resources are easily available than the sample size can be large otherwise smaller
sample would be appropriate.
3) Level of Accuracy Required : For any research, the level of the accuracy affects sample size
as bigger sample represents the whole population properly than a smaller sample. However, it is
not always mandatory that a large sample will always give more accurate results. The selection of
the sampling technique and research tools also impact the accuracy level of the research.
4) Homogeneity or Heterogeneity of the Universe : Homogeneous universe is that universe in
which all the elements are similar, on the other hand heterogeneous universe is that universe where
the elements are different from each other. A A homogeneous universe requires a smaller sample
size, while researcher needs to take bigger sample size in case of heterogeneous universe because
a small sample may not represent the whole population.
5) Nature of Study : The researcher may choose a small sample, if the research is intensive and
fundamental (continuous) in nature. But in those cases, where the research is extensive and applied
(researches which are not going to be repeated soon), then the researcher is bound to select larger
sample size. So, it is quite clear that the nature of study also affects the sample size.
6) Selection of Sampling Technique : The sample size is also impacted by the kind of sampling
technique selected by the researches for conducting the research. For example, when a researcher
adopts the simple random sampling technique then he main choose large sample size, but on the
other hand in stratified sampling technique the researcher needs a comparatively smaller sample
size for accurate and effective results.
7) Attitude of Respondents : The researcher is an experienced individual, so he will always chose
a larger sample size in which he thinks that the non-response rate will be higher. In simple words,
if there are chances that the respondents will not reply and return the questionnaire, then large
sample size is chosen.
8) Degree of the Variability : Degree of variability specifies the extent to which the scores in any
distribution are spread in the population. Larger numbers always indicates greater variability of
scores in a population. Sometimes dispersion is substituted for variability, and this term is widely
used in statistics. If the population is heterogeneous, then the researcher uses larger sample size so
as to receive a specified precision level. On the other hand, if the population is more homogeneous
then the smaller sample size is selected by the researcher.
Probability Sampling:
Probability sampling refers to the selection of a sample from a population, when this selection is
based on the principle of randomization, that is, random selection or chance. Probability sampling
is more complex, more time-consuming and usually more costly than non-probability sampling.
Simple random sampling
Simple random sampling is a statistical method in which everyone in a population has an equal
chance of being selected into a sample. The sample represents a smaller and more manageable
portion of the people that can be studied and analyzed. It’s a fundamental technique to gather data
and make inferences about a population.
Simple random sampling is considered a fair and unbiased sample selection method. This type of
sampling is the most straightforward sample selection method.
Simple random sampling is a technique where every item in the population has an even chance
and likelihood of being selected. Here, the selection of items entirely depends on luck or
probability. Therefore, this sampling technique is also a method of chance.
Simple random sampling is a fundamental method and can easily be a component of a more
complex method. The main attribute of this sampling method is that every sample has the same
probability of being chosen.
The sample size in simple random sampling method should ideally be more than a few hundred so
that it can be applied appropriately. This method is theoretically simple to understand but difficult
to implement practically. Working with a large sample size isn’t an easy task, and it can sometimes
be challenging to find a realistic sampling bias frame.
1. They prepare a list of all the population members initially, and each member is marked
with a specific number ( for example, if there are nth members, then they will be numbered
from 1 to N).
2. Researchers from this population choose random samples using random number tables and
random number generator software. Researchers prefer random number generator
software, as no human interference is necessary to generate samples.
Two approaches aim to minimize any biases in the process of this method:
Method of lottery
Using the lottery method is one of the oldest ways and is a mechanical example of random sample.
Researchers draw numbers from the box randomly to choose samples. In this method, the
researcher gives each member of the population a number.
Using random numbers is an alternative method that also involves numbering the population. A
numbered table similar to the one below can help with this sampling technique.
Using random numbers is an alternative method that also involves numbering the population. A
numbered table similar to the one below can help with this sampling technique.
Consider that a hospital has 1000 staff members and must allocate a night shift to 100 members.
All their names will be put in a bucket to be randomly selected. Since each person has an equal
chance of being selected. Since we know the population size (N) and sample size (n), the
calculation can be as follows:
P=1- N-1/N.N-2/N-1….N-n/N-(n-1)
Cancelling=1-N-n/N
=n/N
=100/1000
=10%
Follow these steps to extract a simple random sample of 100 employees out of 500.
1. Make a list of all the employees working in the organization. (as mentioned above, there
are 500 employees in the organization, so the record must contain 500 names).
2. Assign a sequential number to each employee (1,2,3…n). This is your sampling frame
(the list from which you draw your sample).
3. Figure out what your sample size is going to be. (In this case, the sample size is 100).
4. Use a random number generator to select the sample, using your frame (population size)
from Step 2 and your sample size from Step 3. For example, if your sample size is 100 and
your population is 500, generate 100 random numbers between 1 and 500.
It is important to note that Simple Random Sampling is just one of many sampling
methods available, and it may not always be the best option for your specific research needs.
Today’s market research projects are much larger and involve an indefinite number of items. It is
practically impossible to study every member of the population’s thought process and derive
interference from the study.
If, as a researcher, you want to save your time and money, simple random sampling is one of the
best probability sampling methods that you can use. Getting data from a sample is more advisable
and practical.
Using a census or a sample depends on several factors, such as the type of census, the degree of
homogeneity/heterogeneity, costs, time, feasibility to study, the degree of accuracy needed, etc.
1. It is a fair sampling method, and if applied appropriately, it helps reduce any bias involved
compared to any other sampling method.
2. Since it involves a large sample frame, it is usually easy to pick a smaller sample size from
the existing larger population.
3. The person conducting the research doesn’t need to have prior knowledge of the data he/
she is collecting. One can ask a question to gather the researcher need not be a subject
expert.
4. This sampling method is a fundamental method of collecting the data. You don’t need any
technical knowledge. You only require essential listening and recording skills.
5. Since the population size is vast in this type of sampling method, there is no restriction on
the sample size that the researcher needs to create. From a larger population, you can get a
small sample quite quickly.
6. The data collected through this sampling method is well informative; the more samples
better is the quality of the data.
Overall, this is a valuable and versatile method for gathering data and making inferences about
populations.
Systematic sampling
Systematic sampling is a statistical method used to select a sample from a larger population
systematically and randomly. It is a widespread technique for researchers and analysts who want
to gather data from a large population without surveying every individual. This method is
beneficial when the population is large, diverse, or hard to reach.
This article will delve into the details of systematic sampling, including its definition and
advantages. We will also provide examples of how it can be used in various research and data
analysis contexts and tips on implementing it effectively. Whether you are a researcher, analyst,
or simply interested in understanding this sampling method, this article will give you an
understanding of what it is and how to use it for better decision-making.
Systematic sampling is a statistical method that researchers use to zero down on the desired
population they want to research. Researchers calculate the sampling interval by dividing the entire
population size by the desired sample size determination. It is an extended implementation of
probability sampling in which each group member is selected regularly to form a sample.
Systematic sampling is a probability sampling method where the researcher chooses elements from
a target population by selecting a random starting point and selecting sample members after a fixed
‘sampling interval.’
For example, in school, while selecting the captain of a sports team, most of our coaches asked us
to call out numbers such as 1-5 (1-n) and the students with a random number decided by the coach.
For instance, three would be called out as team captains. It is a non-stressful selection process for
both the coach and the players. There’s an equal opportunity for every member of a population to
be selected using this sampling bias technique.
What are the steps to form a sample using the systematic sampling technique?
Step one: Develop a defined structural audience to start working on the sampling aspect.
Step two: As a researcher, figure out the ideal size of the sample, i.e., how many people from the
entire population to choose to be a part of the sample.
Step three: Once you decide the sample size, assign a number to every member of the sample.
Step four: Define the interval of this sample. This will be the standard distance between the
elements.
For example, the sample interval should be 10, which is the result of the division of 5000 (N= size
of the population) and 500 (n=size of the sample).
Step five: Select the members who fit the criteria which in this case will be 1 in 10 individuals.
Step six: Randomly choose the starting member (r) of the sample and add the interval to the
random number to keep adding members in the sample. r, r+i, r+2i, etc. will be the elements of the
sample.
When you are sampling, ensure you represent the population fairly. Systematic sampling is a
symmetrical process where the researcher chooses the samples after a specifically defined interval.
Sampling like this leaves the researcher no room for bias regarding choosing the sample. To
understand how it exactly works, take the example of the gym class where the instructor asks the
students to line up and asks every third person to step out of the line. Here, the instructor has no
influence over choosing the samples and can accurately represent the class.
For instance, if a local NGO is seeking to form a systematic sample of 500 volunteers from a
population of 5000, they can select every 10th person in the population to build a sample
systematically.
1. First, calculate and fix the sampling interval. (The number of elements in the population
divided by the number of elements needed for the sample.)
2. Choose a random starting point between 1 and the sampling interval.
3. Lastly, repeat the sampling interval to choose subsequent elements.
Linear systematic sampling is a method where samples aren’t repeated at the end and ‘n’ units are
selected to be a part of a sample having ‘N’ population units. Rather than selecting these ‘n’ units
of a sample randomly, a researcher can apply a skip logic to select these. It follows a linear path
and then stops at the end of a particular population.
This sampling or skip interval (k) = N (total population units)/n (sample size)
In circular systematic sampling, a sample starts again from the same point once again after ending;
thus, the name. For example, if N = 7 and n = 2, k=3.5. There are two probable ways to form
sample:
1. If we consider k=3, the samples will be – ad, be, ca, db and ec.
2. If we consider k=4, the samples will be – ae, ba, cb, dc and ed.
Calculate sampling interval (k) = N/n. (If N = 11 and n = 2, then k is taken as 5 and not 6)
Start randomly between 1 to N
Create samples by skipping through k units every time until you select members of the
entire population.
In the case of this method, there will be N number of samples, unlike k samples in the
linear systematic sampling method.
Linear Circular
The start and endpoints of this sample are It restarts from the start point once the entire
distinct. population is considered.
It’s extremely simple and convenient for the researchers to create, conduct, analyze
samples.
As there’s no need to number each member of a sample, it is better for representing a
population in a faster and simpler manner.
The samples created are based on precision in member selection and free from favoritism.
In the other methods of probability sampling methods such as cluster
sampling and stratified sampling or non-probability methods such as convenience
sampling, there are chances of the clusters created to be highly biased which is avoided in
systematic sampling as the members are at a fixed distance from one another.
The factor of risk involved in this sampling method is extremely minimal.
In case there are diverse members of a population, this sampling technique can be
beneficial because of the even distribution of members to form a sample.
Other probability sampling techniques like cluster sampling and stratified random sampling can
be very unorganized and challenging due to which researchers and statisticians have turned to
methods like systematic sampling or simple random sampling for better sampling results. It
consumes the least time as it requires a selection of sample size and identification of the starting
point for this sample, which needs to be continued at regular intervals to form a sample.
Let’s take an example where you want to form a sample of 500 individuals out of a population of
5000; you’d have to number every person in the population.
Once the numbering is done, the researcher can select a number randomly, for instance, 5. The 5th
individual will be the first to be a part of the systematic sample. After that, the 10th member will
be added into the sample, so on and so forth (15th, 25th, 35, 45th, and members till 4995).
Stratified random sampling is a widely used statistical technique in which a population is divided
into different subgroups, or strata, based on some shared characteristics. The purpose of
stratification is to ensure that each stratum in the sample and to make inferences about specific
population subgroups.
This technique is beneficial in cases where the population is heterogeneous, and a simple random
sample may not provide accurate results. By dividing the population into strata, researchers can
ensure that their sample is representative of the population and avoid sampling biases.
Stratified random sampling is a type of probability method using which a research organization
can branch off the entire population into multiple non-overlapping, homogeneous groups (strata)
and randomly choose final members from the various strata for research which reduces cost and
improves efficiency. Members in each of these groups should be distinct so that every member of
all groups gets an equal opportunity to be selected using simple probability. This sampling method
is also called “random quota sampling.”
Let’s consider a situation where a research team seeks opinions about religion among various age
groups. Instead of collecting feedback from 326,044,985 U.S citizens, random samples of around
10000 can be selected for research. These 10000 citizens can be divided into groups according to
age, i.e., 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60 and above. Each stratum will have distinct members
7. Figure out the size of each stratum according to your requirement. The numerical
distribution amongst all the elements in all the strata will determine the type of sampling to
be implemented. It can either be proportional or disproportional stratified sampling.
8. The researcher can select random elements from each stratum to form the sample. A
minimum of one piece must be chosen from each stratum so that there’s representation
from every stratum, but if two elements from each stratum are selected, quickly calculate
the error margins of the calculation of collected data.
Using this method helps ensure that the sample is representative of the population and
reduces sampling error, leading to more accurate results.
Proportionate Sampling:
In this approach, each stratum sample size is directly proportional to the population size of the
entire population of strata. That means each strata sample has the same sampling fraction.
Stratum A B C D
If you have four strata with 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 respective sizes, the research organization
selects ½ as the sampling fraction. A researcher must choose 250, 500, 750, and 1000 members
from the separate stratum.
Irrespective of the sample size of the population, the sampling fraction will remain uniform across
all the strata.
Disproportionate Sampling:
The sampling fraction is the primary differentiating factor between proportionate and
disproportionate stratified random sampling. In excessive sampling, each stratum will have a
different sampling fraction.
The success of this sampling method depends on the researcher’s precision at fraction allocation.
If the allotted fractions aren’t accurate, the results may be biased due to the overrepresented or
underrepresented strata.
Stratum A B C D
Researchers and statisticians use stratified random sampling to analyze relationships between two
or more strata. As stratified random sampling involves multiple layers or strata, it’s crucial to
calculate the strata before calculating the sample value.
Let’s say 100 (Nh) students of a school having 1000 (N) students were asked questions about their
favorite subject. It’s a fact that the students of the 8th grade will have different subject preferences
than the students of the 9th grade. For the survey to deliver precise results, the ideal manner is to
divide each step into various strata.
Grade Number of students (n) Calculate the sample of each grade using the formula:
Stratified random sampling is a statistical technique that offers several advantages over other
methods. Some of the critical benefits include the following:
Stratified random sampling is a valuable and efficient method for a population with distinct
subgroups. Its ability to increase precision, represent each subgroup proportionately, control for
bias, save costs, and improve data quality make it a valuable tool for researchers in many fields.
Stratified random sampling should be used when the population under study has distinct
subgroups, and the goal is to make inferences about each subgroup or the population as a whole.
This technique is beneficial when:
1. Stratified random sampling is a highly productive method sampling in situations where the
researcher intends to focus only on specific strata from the available population data. This
way, the desired characteristics of the strata can be found in the survey sample.
2. Researchers rely on this sampling method in cases where they intend to establish a
relationship between two or more different strata. If this comparison is conducted
using simple random sampling, there is a higher likelihood of the target groups not being
equally represented.
3. Samples with a population which are difficult to access or contact can be quickly involved
in the research process using the stratified random sampling technique.
4. The accuracy of statistical results is higher than simple random sampling since the elements
of the sample and chosen from relevant strata. The diversification within the strata will be
much lesser than the diversification in the target population. Due to the accuracy involved,
the required sample size will be much lesser, which will help researchers save time and
effort.
5. Public opinion polls often use stratified random sampling to represent the population
concerning demographic characteristics such as region, political affiliation, or age.
Stratified random sampling is practical when the population has distinct subgroups, and the goal
is to make inferences about each subgroup or the population as a whole.
Cluster sampling
Cluster sampling is defined as a sampling method where the researcher creates multiple clusters
of people from a population where they are indicative of homogeneous characteristics and have an
equal chance of being a part of the sample.
Cluster sampling is a probability sampling technique where researchers divide the population into
multiple groups (clusters) for research. So researchers then select random groups with a simple
random or systematic random sampling technique for data collection and unit of analysis.
In this sampling technique, researchers analyze a sample that consists of multiple sample
parameters such as demographics, habits, background – or any other population attribute, which
may be the focus of conducted research. This method is usually conducted when groups that are
similar yet internally diverse form a statistical population. Instead of selecting the entire
population, cluster sampling allows the researchers to collect data by bifurcating the data into
small, more productive groups.
There are two ways to classify this sampling technique. The first way is based on the number of
stages followed to obtain the cluster sample, and the second way is the representation of the groups
in the entire cluster analysis. In most cases, sampling by clusters happens over multiple stages. A
stage is considered to be the step taken to get to the desired sample. We can divide this technique
into single-stage, two-stage, and multiple stages.
As the name suggests, sampling is done just once. An example of single-stage cluster sampling –
An NGO wants to create a sample of girls across five neighboring towns to provide education.
Using single-stage sampling, the NGO randomly selects towns (clusters) to form a sample and
extend help to the girls deprived of education in those towns.
Here, instead of selecting all the elements of a cluster, only a handful of members are chosen from
each group by implementing systematic or simple random sampling. An example of two-stage
cluster sampling – A business owner wants to explore the performance of his/her plants that are
spread across various parts of the U.S. The owner creates clusters of plants. So he/she then select
random samples from these clusters to conduct research.
Multiple-stage cluster sampling takes a step or a few steps further than two-stage sampling.
For conducting effective research across multiple geographies, one needs to form complicated
clusters that can be achieved only using the multiple-stage sampling technique. An example of
Multiple stage sampling by clusters – An organization intends to survey to analyze the
performance of smartphones across Germany. They can divide the entire country’s population into
cities (clusters) and select cities with the highest population and also filter those using mobile
devices.
1. Sample: Decide the target audience and also the sample size.
2. Create and evaluate sampling frames: Create a sampling frame by using either an existing
framework or creating a new one for the target audience. Evaluate frameworks based on
coverage and clustering and make adjustments accordingly. These groups will be varied,
considering the population, which can be exclusive and comprehensive. Members of a sample
are selected individually.
3. Determine groups: Determine the number of groups by including the same average members
in each group. So make sure each of these groups is distinct from one another.
4. Select clusters: Choose clusters by applying a random selection.
5. Create sub-types: It is bifurcated into two-stage and multi-stage subtypes based on the
number of steps followed by researchers to form clusters.
This sampling technique is used in an area or geographical cluster sampling for market research.
A broad geographic location can be expensive to survey compared to surveys sent to clusters
divided based on region. The sample numbers must be increased to achieve accurate results, but
the cost savings make this process of rising clusters attainable.
The technique is widely used in statistics where the researcher can’t collect data from the entire
population. So, it is the most economical and practical solution for research statisticians. Take the
example of a researcher looking to understand smartphone usage in Germany. In this case, the
cities of Germany will form clusters. This sampling method is also used in wars and natural
calamities to draw inferences about a population, where collecting data from every individual
residing is impossible.
There are multiple advantages to using cluster sampling. Here they are:
Consumes less time and cost: Sampling of geographic segmentation divided groups
requires less work, time, and cost. It’s a highly economical method to observe clusters
instead of randomly doing them throughout a particular region by allocating a limited
number of resources to those selected clusters.
Convenient access: Researchers can choose large samples with this convenience
sampling technique, and that’ll increase accessibility to various clusters.
Data accuracy: Since there can be large samples in each cluster, loss of data accuracy in
information per individual can be compensated.
Ease of implementation: Cluster sampling facilitates information from various areas and
groups. Researchers can quickly implement it in practical situations compared to other
probability sampling methods.
In comparison to simple random sampling, tis technique can be useful in deciding the
characteristics of a group such as population, and researchers can implement it without having a
sampling frame for all the elements for the entire population.
Since cluster sampling and stratified random sampling are pretty similar, there could be issues with
understanding their finer nuances. So let’s talk about the significant differences between cluster
sampling and stratified sampling:
Elements of a population are randomly selected to The researcher divides the entire
be a part of groups (clusters). population into even segments (strata).
It is a type of sampling that doesn’t depend on chance and is often used in research studies. This
sampling technique involves choosing people who are easy for the researcher to reach and get in
touch with.
Instead of picking people at random from a certain population, convenience sampling involves
picking the people who are easiest for the researcher to get information from.
Convenience sampling is often used when other types of sampling methods are hard or impossible
to use because of time, cost, or other issues. Even though it can be a quick and easy way to get
data, it can also have biases and limitations that can affect how well the results can be used in the
real world and how reliable they are.
Convenience sampling is defined as a method adopted by researchers where they collect market
research data from a conveniently available pool of respondents.
It is the most commonly used sampling as it’s incredibly prompt, uncomplicated, and economical.
Members are often readily approachable to be a part of the sample.
Researchers use various sampling techniques in situations where there are large populations. In
most cases, testing the entire community is practically impossible because they are not easy to
reach. Researchers use convenience sampling in situations where additional inputs are not
necessary for the principal research. There are no criteria required to be a part of this sample.
Thus, it becomes incredibly simplified to include elements in this sample. All components of the
population are eligible and dependent on the researcher’s proximity to get involved in the sample.
The researcher chooses members merely based on proximity and doesn’t consider whether they
represent the entire population or not.
Using this technique, they can observe habits, opinions, and viewpoints in the easiest possible
manner.
A good example of convenience sampling is A new NGO that wants to establish itself in 20
cities. It selects the top 20 cities to serve based on the proximity to where they’re based.
It is important to highlight that convenience sampling has limits and biases that can affect the
reliability and generalizability of the findings.
As a result, before depending on this sampling technique to make crucial decisions, organizations
must carefully analyze the potential biases and limits.
Convenience sampling is applied by brands and organizations to measure their perception of their
image in the market. Data is collected from potential customers to understand specific issues or
manage opinions of a newly launched product. In some cases, it is the only available option.
For example, a university student working on a project and wants to understand the average
consumption of soda on campus on a Friday night will most possibly call his/her classmates and
friends and ask how many cans of soda they consume. Or may go to a party nearby and conduct
an easy online survey.
There is always a chance that the randomly selected population may not accurately represent the
population of interest, thus increasing the chances of research bias.
Businesses use this sampling technique to gather information to address critical issues arising from
the market. They also use it when collecting feedback about a particular feature or a newly
launched product from the sample created.
During the initial stages of survey research, researchers usually prefer using this as it’s quick and
easy to deliver results. Even if many statisticians avoid implementing this technique, it is vital in
situations where you intend to get insights in a shorter period or without investing too much money.
For instance, a marketing student needs to get feedback on the “scope of content marketing in
2020.” The student may quickly create an online survey, send a link to all the contacts on your
phone, share a link on social media, and talk to people you meet daily, face-to-face.
For example, a researcher conducting a study on cancer survivors’ experiences may choose to
recruit volunteers using social media groups or cancer support networks because they are easily
accessible and likely to be interested in the study.
Convenience sampling in qualitative research can also contribute to data biases because the sample
may not be representative of the greater community or may be prejudiced towards participants
with certain qualities or experiences.
While evaluating the findings of their study, researchers must carefully evaluate the various limits
and biases of this sampling strategy.
Convenience sampling includes a number of drawbacks that can reduce the reliability and validity
of research findings. The following are some of the major drawbacks:
1. Bias in sampling
When participants are not chosen at random from a larger population, this might result in
sampling bias. This indicates that the sample may not be typical of the greater population,
and the findings may not apply to other groups.
2. Lack of variety
Because the researcher may choose participants who are easily accessible and have
comparable features, this may result in a lack of variety in the sample. This can
potentially narrow the spectrum of opinions and experiences represented in the sample.
3. External validity is limited
It may have poor external validity due to the possibility of sampling bias and a lack of
diversity. As a result, the findings may not apply to different locations or populations.
4. Unknown errors
Convenience sampling can lead to unknown errors since the researcher may be unaware
of how skewed or unrepresentative the sample is of the population.
5. Possibility of researcher bias
Researchers may be more prone to select participants who they believe would offer data
that supports their theory, perhaps contributing to researcher bias.
While it can be a valuable and cost-effective method of data collection in some contexts, it is
crucial to understand its limitations and inherent biases. When selecting to utilize it in their
research, researchers should carefully assess its advantages and disadvantages.
The best way of reducing bias in convenience sampling is to use it along with probability sampling.
Since it is usually biased, probability sampling gets the measurement parameter with it to keep
this sampling bias under check.
After receiving a fair idea about this bias using probability sampling, the researcher can use both
convenience sampling and probability sampling techniques to draw a more accurate estimation.
The probability aspect used, along with the convenience sample, will have to be powerful enough
to overcome it.
Bias can make the entire sample futile, which is the last thing a researcher needs. This bias can be
reduced or eliminated by including probability sampling.
Here are three quick hacks to efficiently analyze convenience sampling data. It is best to use
probability sampling, but when that is not possible, here are three hacks you should keep in mind.
For a big sample size, try cross-validation for half the data. Then compare the findings with
the other half of the data.
Judgmental sampling
Definition
The process of selecting a sample using judgmental sampling involves the researchers carefully
picking and choosing each individual to be a part of the sample. The researcher’s knowledge is
primary in this sampling process as the members of the sample are not randomly chosen.
Judgmental sampling is most effective in situations where there are only a restricted number of
people in a population who own qualities that a researcher expects from the target population.
Researchers prefer to implement Judgmental sampling when they feel that other sampling
techniques will consume more time and that they have confidence in their knowledge to select a
sample for conducting research.
Judgmental or Expert sampling is usually used in situations where the target population comprises
of highly intellectual individuals who cannot be chosen by using any other probability or non-
probability sampling technique. It is also used in situations where the sample selected using other
sampling methods need to be approved or filtered. For instance, in situations where a researcher
conducts convenience sampling to gather feedback from professors about their university but the
fact that there are high chances of the results to be skewed, researchers prefer judgmental sampling
to select those professors who will provide 100% feedback about the university.
Selecting each individual of the sample is a critical challenge that an intellectual researcher will
undertake. It is a tedious task to handpick members of a sample while ensuring there is no bias
involved.
The authority involved in the selection process may not necessarily be “experts” in the field but
they have to comply with certain characteristics expected from a Judgmental sampling authority
and sampling errors. Education or work experience is not considered while appointing authorities
for the selection process.
Purposive sampling is used where there is time-constraint for sample creation and the authorities
involved would prefer relying on their knowledge and not on other sampling methods. But, one
must keep in mind, the fact that a researcher may or may not have the appropriate proficiency to
conduct an effective sampling process. This is the only disadvantage of purposive sampling. Each
researcher who takes up the responsibility of creating a sample using expert sampling will have to
be extremely confident in their own skills and understanding of the subject.
Consider a scenario where a panel decides to understand what are the factors which lead a
person to select ethical hacking as a profession. Ethical hacking is a skill which has been
recently attracting youth. More and more people are selecting it as a profession. The
researchers who understand what ethical hacking is will be able to decide who should form
the sample to learn about it as a profession. That is when judgmental sampling is
implemented. Researchers can easily filter out those participants who can be eligible to be
a part of the research sample.
There are many tribes in the world which have their own religious beliefs, for instance, the
Balinese people follow syncretism, which is considered to be a mixture of Hinduism and
Buddhism. For researchers who plan to study the culture of Southeast Asian countries, it
is advised that they select strata using judgmental sampling as religious beliefs are
considered to be highly sensitive in this part of the world. Due to the sensitivity of the topic,
if samples of those who have appropriate knowledge are created and research is conducted
with those samples, results will be highly accurate. Probability sampling techniques often
produce altered results in such cases.
Consumes minimum time for execution: In this sampling bias approach, researcher
expertise is important and there are no other barriers involved due to which selecting a
sample becomes extremely convenient.
Allows researchers to approach their target market directly: There are no criteria
involved in selecting a sample except for the researcher’s preferences. Due to this, he/she
can communicate directly with the target audience of their choice and produce desired
results.
Almost real-time results: A quick poll or survey can be conducted with the sample using
judgmental sampling since the members of the sample will possess appropriate knowledge
and understanding of the subject.
For example, if you are studying the level of customer satisfaction among the members of an elite
country club, you will find it extremely difficult to collect primary data sources unless a member
of the club agrees to have a direct conversation with you and provides the contact details of the
other members of the club.
This sampling method involves a primary data source nominating other potential data sources that
will be able to participate in the research studies. Snowball sampling method is purely based on
referrals and that is how a researcher is able to generate a sample. Therefore this method is also
called the chain-referral sampling method.
Snowball sampling is a popular business study method. The snowball sampling method is
extensively used where a population is unknown and rare and it is tough to choose subjects to
assemble them as samples for research.
This sampling technique can go on and on, just like a snowball increasing in size (in this case the
sample size) till the time a researcher has enough data to analyze, to draw conclusive results that
can help an organization make informed decisions.
1. Linear Snowball Sampling: The formation of a sample group starts with one individual
subject providing information about just one other subject and then the chain continues
with only one referral from one subject. This pattern is continued until enough number of
subjects are available for the sample.
2. Exponential Non-Discriminative Snowball Sampling: In this type, the first subject is
recruited and then he/she provides multiple referrals. Each new referral then provides with
more data for referral and so on, until there is enough number of subjects for the sample.
3. Exponential Discriminative Snowball Sampling: In this technique, each subject gives
multiple referrals, however, only one subject is recruited from each referral. The choice of
a new subject depends on the nature of the research study.
The nature of snowball sampling is such, that it cannot be considered for a representative sample or
in that case for statistical studies. However, this sampling technique can be extensively used for
conducting qualitative research, with a population that is hard to locate. Let us now explore how
snowball sampling can be carried out:
Consider hypothetically, you as a researcher are studying the homeless in Texas City. It is
obviously difficult to find a list of all the details of the number of homeless there. However, you
are able to identify one or two homeless individuals who are willing to participate in your research
studies.
Now, these homeless individuals provide you with the details of other homeless individuals they
know. The first homeless individual that you found for your research is the primary data. You can
collect the information and tabulate data from the primary data source and move on to other
individuals who the primary data source has referred to. You as a researcher can continue to tap as
many homeless you can find through the reference provided till you know you have collected
enough data for your research.
The same strategy can be followed to conduct research or study individuals belonging to certain
underground subculture, or individuals who have a hidden identity or are members of a cult etc.
who don’t want to be identified easily. Trust is an important part of any researcher.
An individual, who is ready to share information, needs to know that the information will be used
discreetly and this kind of trust is especially important in snowball sampling. For a participant to
agree to identify themselves or their group, researchers first need to develop that kind of rapport
with the participants. Please know that this sampling technique may consume more time than
anticipated because of its nature.
Snowball Sampling Applications
Snowball sampling is usually used in cases where there is no precalculated list of target population
details (homeless people), there is immense pain involved in contacting members of the target
population (victims of rare diseases) , members of the target population are not inclined towards
contributing due to a social stigma attached to them (hate-crime, rape or sexual abuse victims,
sexuality, etc.) or the confidentiality of the organization respondents work for (CIA, FBI or
terrorist organization).
Medical Practices: There are many less-researched diseases. There may be a restricted
number of individuals suffering from diseases such as progeria, porphyria, Alice in
Wonderland syndrome etc. Using snowball sampling, researchers can get in touch with
these hard to contact sufferers and convince them to participate in the survey research.
Social research: Social research is a field which requires as many participants as possible
as it is a process where scientists learn about their target sample. When social research is
to be conducted in domains where participants might not necessarily willing to contribute
such as homeless or the less-fortunate people.
Cases of discord: In case of disputes such as an act of terrorism, violation of civil rights
and other similar situations, the individuals involved may oppose giving their statements
for evidential purposes. The researchers or management can use snowball sampling, to
filter out those people from a population who are most likely to have caused the situation
or are witness to the event to gather proof around the event.
For some population, snowball sampling is the only way of collecting data and meaningful
information. Following are the instances, where snowball sampling can be used:
1. No official list of names of the members: This sampling technique can be used for a
population, where there is no easily available data like their demographic information. For
example, homeless or list of members of an elite club, whose personal details cannot be
obtained easily.
2. Difficulty to locate people: People with rare diseases are quite difficult to locate.
However, if a researcher is carrying out a research study similar in nature, finding the
primary data source can be a challenge. Once he/she is identified, they usually have
information about more such similar individuals.
3. People who are not willing to be identified: If a researcher is carrying out a study which
involves collecting information/data from sex workers or victims of sexual assault or
individuals who don’t want to disclose their sexual orientations, these individuals will fall
under this category.
4. Secretiveness about their identity: People who belong to a cult or are religious extremists
or hackers usually fall under this category. A researcher will have to use snowball sampling
to identify these individuals and extract information from them.
1. It’s quicker to find samples: Referrals make it easy and quick to find subjects as they
come from reliable sources. An additional task is saved for a researcher, this time can be
used in conducting the study.
2. Cost effective: This method is cost effective as the referrals are obtained from a primary
data source. It’s is convenient and not so expensive as compared to other methods.
3. Sample hesitant subjects: Some people do not want to come forward and participate in
research studies, because they don’t want their identity to be exposed. Snowball sampling
helps for this situation as they ask for a reference from people known to each other. There
are some sections of the target population which are hard to contact. For example, if a
researcher intends to understand the difficulties faced by HIV patients, other sampling
methods will not be able to provide these sensitive samples. In snowball sampling,
researchers can closely examine and filter members of a population infected by HIV and
conduct a research by talking to them, making them understand the research objective, and
eventually, analyzing the received feedback.
1. Sampling bias and margin of error: Since people refer those whom they know and have
similar traits, this sampling method can have a potential sampling errors and margin of
error. This means a researcher might only be able to reach out to a small group of people
and may not be able to complete the study with conclusive results.
2. Lack of cooperation: There are fair chances even after referrals, people might not be
cooperative and refuse to participate in the research studies.
Quota sampling:
Definition
Quota sampling is defined as a non-probability sampling method in which researchers create
a convenience sample involving individuals that represent a population. Researchers choose these
individuals according to specific traits or qualities. They decide and create quotas so that the
market research samples can be useful in collecting data. These samples can be generalized to the
entire population. The final subset will be decided only according to the interviewer’s or
researcher’s knowledge of the population.
For example, a cigarette company wants to find out what age group prefers what brand of cigarettes
in a particular city. They apply survey quota on the age groups of 21-30, 31-40, 41-50, and 51+.
From this information, the researcher gauges the smoking trend among the population of the city.
Quota sampling can be of two kinds – controlled quota sampling and uncontrolled quota sampling.
Here’s what they mean:
Controlled quota sampling imposes restrictions on the researcher’s choice of samples. Here, the
researcher is limited to the selection of samples.
Uncontrolled quota sampling does not impose any restrictions on the researcher’s choice of
samples. Here, the researcher chooses sample members at will.
A researcher wants to survey individuals about what smartphone brand they prefer to use. He/she
considers a sample size of 500 respondents. Also, he/she is only interested in surveying ten states
in the US. Here’s how the researcher can divide the population by quotas:
Depending on the type of research, the researcher can apply quotas based on the sampling frame.
It is not necessary for the researcher to divide the quotas equally. He/she divides the quotas as per
his/her need (as shown in the example where the researcher interviews 350 employed and only
150 unemployed individuals). Random sampling can be conducted to reach out to the respondents.
Probability sampling techniques involve a significant amount of rules that the researcher needs to
follow to form samples. But, since quota sampling is a non-probability sampling technique, there
are no rules for formally creating samples. Usually, there are four steps to form a quota sample.
Here are the steps:
1. Divide the sample population into subgroups: With stratified random sampling, the
researcher bifurcates the entire population into mutually exhaustive subgroups, i.e., the
elements of each of the subgroups becomes a part of only one of those subgroups. Here,
the researcher applies random selection.
2. Figure out the weightage of subgroups: The researcher evaluates the proportion in which
the subgroups exist in the population. He/she maintains this proportion in the sample
selected using this type of sampling method.
3. For example, if 58% of the people who are interested in purchasing your Bluetooth
headphones are between the age group of 25-35 years, your subgroups also should have
the same percentages of people belonging to the respective age group.
4. Select an appropriate sample size: In the third step, the researcher should select the
sample size while maintaining the proportion evaluated in the previous step. If the
population size is 500, the researcher can pick a sample of 50 elements.
The sample chosen after following the first three steps should represent the target
population.
5. Conduct surveys according to the quotas defined: Make sure to stick to the predefined
quotas to achieve actual actionable results. Don’t survey quotas that are full and focus on
completing surveys for each quota.
1. Saves time: Because of the involvement of a quota for sample creation, this sampling
process is quick and straightforward.
2. Research convenience: By using quota sampling and appropriate research questions,
interpreting information and responses to the survey is a much convenient process for a
researcher.
3. Accurate representation of the population of interest: Researchers effectively represent
a population using this sampling technique. There is no room for over-representation as
this sampling technique helps researchers to study the population using specific quotas.
4. Saves money: The budget required for executing this sampling method is minimalistic.
Below are the instances where quota sampling is applied and used.
In situations where researchers have specific criteria for conducting research, it allows the
selection of subgroups, due to which it becomes extremely convenient for researchers to
obtain desired results. A trait or characteristic can be the filter for subgroup formation.
The researcher uses this method when he/she has time constraints. Applying quotas gives
the researcher an idea of the whole population of interest in very little time.
Quotas are applied when the researcher is on a tight budget. Instead of researching a large
population, the researcher saves money by using a few quotas to get the whole picture of
the population.
Some research studies do not require pinpoint accuracy due to the nature of the research
project. It is ideal for applying to quota sampling for these studies.
Errors in sampling.
Assume you are a market researcher of a company looking to introduce a new product to the
market. You must collect data from a sample of potential customers as part of your research to
determine their preferences and purchasing behavior. But how can you be sure that the information
you get from your sample is accurate for all of the people who might buy your product? The idea
of sampling error comes into play here.
It is the difference between what a sample has and what the entire population has. It can
significantly affect how accurate and reliable market research data is.
We will cover ways to reduce sampling error in this article to get more accurate and reliable results.
Now, grab your favorite coffee and get ready to explore what sampling error is.
A sampling error occurs when the sample used in the study does not represent the entire population.
Although sampling errors occur frequently, researchers always include a margin of error in their
conclusions as a matter of statistical practice.
The margin of error is the amount allowed for a miscalculation to represent the difference between
the sample and the actual population.
Sampling is a type of analysis where a small sample of observations is chosen from a larger
population. The selection process can produce both sampling errors and non-sampling errors.
Sampling errors are differences between a sample’s values and the actual population’s values. This
is because a sample does not accurately represent the whole population of data.
Since there was a mistake in collecting the data, the results from sampling are no longer valid.
Also, when a sample is chosen randomly or because of bias, it doesn’t represent the whole
population, and sampling errors are likely to happen.
It is possible to avoid them if analysts carefully choose representative subsets of data from which
to draw conclusions about the entire population. Factors including sample size and design,
diversity in the population, and sampling percentage all contribute to sampling errors.
Diversity in the population increases the error in the estimations since it causes sampling to
produce mixed results. Increasing the size of the samples allows them to represent the population
more accurately, reducing the impact of population variation.
It is important to consider sampling errors before reporting survey results to establish confidence
in the reliability of the estimates and their conclusions.
Here are the top four market research errors while sampling:
A population specification error occurs when researchers don’t know precisely who to
survey.
For example, imagine a research study about kid’s apparel. Who is the right person to
survey? It can be both parents, only the mother, or the child. The parents make purchase
decisions, but the kids may influence their choice.
Sampling frame error occurs when researchers target the sub-population wrongly while
selecting the sample.
For example, picking a sampling frame from the telephone white pages book may have
erroneous inclusions because people shift their cities. Erroneous exclusions occur when
people prefer to un-list their numbers. Wealthy households may have more than one
connection, thus leading to multiple inclusions.
Selection error
Selection error occurs when respondents self-select themselves to participate in the study.
You can control selection errors by going the extra step to request responses from the
entire sample. Only interested ones respond.
Pre-survey planning, follow-ups, and a neat and clean survey design will boost
respondents’ participation rate. Also, try sampling methods like CATI surveys and in-
person interviews to maximize responses.
Sampling errors
These sampling errors can be controlled and eliminated by creating a careful sample
design, having a large enough sample to reflect the entire population, or using an online
sample or survey audiences to collect responses.
Let’s say a political party conducts a survey to find out how well-liked their candidate is before a
major election. Instead of picking a random sample of the whole population to survey, they only
ask their own members.
The sample would be skewed since party members may have extremely different opinions and
tastes from the rest of the population. Party members may care more about their candidate’s ideals
or be more loyal to them. This may cause the survey to suggest more support than the general
population has.
Suppose the survey results are used to make campaign decisions, such as where to allocate money
or which issues to prioritize. In that case, they may not accurately reflect the candidate’s support
among the people. This could result in a poor campaign plan, affecting their election chances.
To avoid these kinds of sampling errors, it is essential to use a sampling method that is
representative of the population being studied, such as random sampling or stratified random
sampling, and to make sure that the sample size is big enough to give accurate results.
Statistical theories help researchers measure the probability of sampling errors in sample size and
population. The size of the sample considered from the population primarily determines the size
of the sampling error. Larger sample sizes tend to encounter a lower rate of errors.
Researchers use a metric known as the margin of error to understand and evaluate the margin of
error. Usually, a confidence level of 95% is considered to be the desired confidence level.
Surveys can have sampling and non-sampling errors. Survey findings can be affected by sampling
and non-sampling mistakes.
Sampling error arises when a survey sample does not accurately represent the population being
researched due to random sampling. Sampling and non-response bias, measurement error, and
sampling variability can cause this.
Non-sampling error includes all survey errors other than sampling errors. This includes
questionnaire design, coding, data input, data collection, processing, and analysis errors. Improper
interviewer training, insufficient or inaccurate data, or data analysis or reporting errors can create
non-sampling errors.
Non-sampling error can be decreased by applying quality control measures and ensuring that all
components of the survey process are properly designed, implemented, and monitored, whereas
sampling error can be reduced by utilizing appropriate sampling procedures and increasing the
sample size.
Sampling in statistics means choosing the research group. Sampling error and sampling bias affect
sample accuracy and representativeness in statistics.
Sampling error occurs because a sample is a subset of the population and may not precisely
represent it. Instead, sampling bias occurs when the sample is not representative of the population.
This may happen if the method used to choose the sample favors or excludes particular sorts of
people, resulting in an overrepresentation or underrepresentation of particular groups.
Using stratified or random sampling and unbiased, population-representative sample selection can
reduce sampling bias. On the other hand, sampling error can be reduced by using the proper
sampling methods and making the sample size bigger.
Sampling errors are easy to identify. Here are a few simple steps to reduce sampling error:
A larger sample size is more accurate because the study gets closer to the actual population
size.
Test groups according to their size in the population instead of a random sample. For
example, if people of a specific demographic make up 20% of the population, make sure
that your study is made up of this variable to reduce sampling bias.
Study your population and understand its demographic mix. Know what demographics use
your product and service and ensure you only target the sample that matters.
We have also created a tool to help you determine your sample size easily: Sample Size Calculator.
A sampling error is measurable, and researchers can use it to their advantage to estimate their
findings’ accuracy and variance.
******************************************************************************