Proof of God

(1) Whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence

(2) The universe began to exist
(2.1) Argument based on the impossibility of an actual infinite
(2.11)An actual infinite cannot exist
(2.12)An infinite temporal regress of events is an actual infinite
(2.13)Therefore, an infinite temporal regress of events cannot exist
(2.2)Argument based on the impossibility of the formation of an actual infinite by successive
addition
(2.21) A collection formed by successive addition cannot be an actual infinite
(2.22) The temporal series of past events is a collection formed by successive addition
(2.23)Therefore, the temporal series of past events cannot be actually an infinite

(3) Therefore, the universe has a cause of its existence

The math problem for infinite with its absurdities

(2.11) an illustration: Hilbert’s Hotel by the German mathematician David Hilbert, Suppose all the rooms
of a hotel with a finite number of rooms. Suppose that all the rooms are full. When a new guest arrives to
ask for a room the Owner of the Hotel says no I am sorry we are full. But know lets looks at the hotel
with an infinite set of rooms. The guest arrives and wants a room, the Owner says but of course. He
moves each person to a successive new room adding a vacant room in room 1. But remember when the
quest arrived all the rooms were full! In addition, based on mathematics no guests were added, the
number is just infinite. In fact this is the same no matter how many quest u add.

Because of 2.11, 2.12 cannot be. Therefore according to mathematics the universe is a Finite system
since there is not infinite, and a process of growing or potential is not an actual infinite. But to claim a
potential infinite, does not exist; only the past is actual in a way the future is not, and in the present we
have traces to the past, whereas the future we do not. Hence, if the series of past events never began to
exist, there must have been an actual infinite number of past events which based on 2.1 cannot occur.

(2.1) is the utter impossibility based on above to ever reach infinite for it to be actual through successive
addition. The impossibility of counting to infinity; time is irrelevant in this mathematical problem the
problem is in the definition of what infinite is. Working this problem backwards or forwards causes the
same dilemma “infinites are impossibility.”

Thus the Universe has a beginning and an ending and is a closed system.

Scientific Proofs

The universe has aa definite beginning we know that this is true because cosmic echoes //Analysis of
the cosmic microwave background radiation—the fading afterglow of the big bang discovered in the
late 1960s—indicated that the universe erupted into existence in an astonishingly uniform state.—
Paul Davies, Scientific American, "In Memoriam: John D. Barrow," 10 Oct. 2020
We also know that the universe has an end based on the second law of thermodynamics // The Second
Law of Thermodynamics says that processes that involve the transfer or conversion of heat energy are
irreversible. ... It states that as energy is transferred or transformed, more and more of it is wasted.
Basically, overtime heat death will occur and since heat powers the universe it will end. Heat death is
basically the universe would evolve to a state of no thermodynamic free energy and would therefore be
unable to sustain processes that increase entropy. Heat death does not imply any particular absolute
temperature; it only requires that temperature differences or other processes may no longer be exploited to
perform work. In the language of physics, this is when the universe reaches thermodynamic
equilibrium (maximum entropy).

Some have tried to use the theoretical model of the universe oscillating, the issue according Dr. Beatrice
Tinsley is the mathematics/physics starts from a beginning, expands, collapses, and then ends. The fact
that the model ends does not help a theorist for an infinite, it just further proves that the second law of
thermodynamics affects all models that would attempt to have continuance, furthermore, because of the
finite future of the universe based on thermodynamics, an infinite past would mean that our current
universe would already be dead aka heat death or in a state of equilibrium. Since it is not, The only
solution is that it had a beginning. A few physicist try to use a multicycle model where with each
successive cycle growth and entropy increase, but this works backwards to a beginning, Novikov and
Zeldovich proponents of this model would say that the universe has a finite past.

Therefore, a beginning and an end where no work can further be exploited which makes the universe a
closed system for if work can no longer be exploited or transferred than the system itself must be closed.
This brings us to the third and final stage of thought. Quantum physics specifically the Schrodinger
equation says that no closed system can start itself, invent energy, mass, matter, time, information or any
of the features that our universe has from within itself.

For this some have pointed to singularity as the closed system already having all these things which
causes a few problems. One singularity only occur in black holes where nothing can escape and have an
event horizon which gives us that proof that not even Light the fastest possible expansion cannot escape.
The other issue is even with singularities we start with a beginning in which a cause must necessarily
occur to kick the expansion. So singularities, which according to Forbes is disproven as
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/07/27/there-was-no-big-bang-
singularity/?sh=35996ea67d81

“One thing that we can mathematically demonstrate, in fact, is that it's impossible for an inflating
state to arise from a singularity. Here's why: space expands at an exponential rate during inflation.
Think about how an exponential works: after a certain amount of time goes by, the Universe
doubles in size. Wait twice as long, and it doubles twice, making it four times as large. Wait three
times as long, it doubles thrice, making it 8 times as large. And if you wait 10 or 100 times as
long, those doublings make the Universe 210 or 2100 times as large.

Which means if we go backwards in time by that same amount, or twice, or thrice, or 10 or 100
times, the Universe would be smaller, but would never reach a size of 0. Respectively, it would
be half, a quarter, an eighth, 2-10, or 2-100 times its original size. But no matter how far back you
go, you never achieve a singularity.”
 We also know, for example, that inflation cannot arise from a singular state, because an inflating
region must always begin from a finite size.

-Ethan Siegal

Since there is nothing beyond such as the universe and heat death is eventual at the end of the universe the
only option is that something outside the closed system started the system. Some physicist have tried to
get around this truth by speaking of multiverses and such all while ignoring the same principles of heat
death that the original universe abides by. Eventually you end up with the same restriction of the and 2nd
law of thermodynamics which leads to heat death of all possible universes with an ultimate beginning and
an ultimate end with no way to introduce the stuff to make the system except from a source that is
“intelligent, sends info, matter, time, mass, energy…” only a being outside the systems of time, matter
and energy can press the go button and that is GOD.

But you might say why does it have to be God? You can call God at this point whatever you like, but it
must be All Powerful to start a Universe, and a fully conscious being to obey the Observer affects that
quantum mechanics demands, it must also stand outside of all that it creates Matter, mass, and time, thus,
eliminating physical beings of any kind that are bound by time.

What is this observer problem, namely that based on wave particle equation, until something is observed
it doesn’t exist, it is the observance that causes it to exist. This has been proven over and over by science
through quantum entanglement Quantum entanglement — or "spooky action at a distance," as Albert
Einstein famously called it — is the idea that the fates of tiny particles are linked to each other even if
they're separated by long distances. Therefore, scientifically the first observer must be a conscious being
and your very existence is due to the mind of God.