Potential of Air Lift Pumps 2 PDF Free
Potential of Air Lift Pumps 2 PDF Free
, ..::
and Multiphase
pplications of so-called "air-lift This is in accord with analogous experi
A
pumps" in fields other than ence in the injection of flashing feeds into
petroleum (I) have included risers in fluid catalytic cracking units,
the handling of hazardous flu an alo gously carrying upwardly bulk
ids (2), the design of bioreactors (3,4), solids (particles) as opposed to bulk liq
the recovery of archeological artifacts uids (molecules), and also accounts for
(5). recycle aeration in sludge digestors some amount of scatter in published
(6), deep sea mining (7), and the recovery experimental data on air-lift capacity.
of manganese nodules (8,9,10) from Since injected gas bubbles are dis
ocean floors. Interest among a host of placed upwardly by the downward "slip"
domestic (//-17,18) and foreign (/9) flow of liquid (that is, dense phase (23))
organizations dates back several decades; at the walls, the cross section through an
Use this having passed EPA hurdles (20), recovery upward moving gas bubble represents a
new capacity of ocean resources has been further sanc countercurrent flow as depicted in Figure
tioned by U.S. legislation (/7). With the le despite a net upward transport of slugs
correlation for exception of "bioreactors" the practical of liquid. This local countercurrent flow
pump design. design and operation of an air-lift pump is analogous to the empty pipe flooding
lies in the dense-phase slug-flow regime phenomena illustrated in Figure Id for
of cocurrent gas-liquid upflow (21). which correlations already exist (24). In
view of the identical flow phenomena in
Figures le and Id, accounting for the sys
The transition to slug flow tem variables should also be identical
The entrainment of spray or droplets whether the net flows are cocurrent or
f. A.Zenz. as occurs from a fractionator tray consti countercurrent
AIMS tutes a form of dilute phase cocurrent
gas-liquid upflow. Since bubble caps
have been used as foot pieces in gas lift Dense phase liquid
pumps, a pipe set over a cap on a tray, as transport by gas-lift pumps
illustrated in Figure 1 a, constitutes con In Figure I b, gas compressed to a
c e p t u a lly a low efficiency bubbling pressure level equivalent to the depth of
upflow gas lift operating at very shallow submergence is introduced to the lift pipe
submergence. In practice, a gas lift oper to displace liquid upwardly. As the liquid
ates with deeper submergence, and more flows back down into the bubble-form
efficiently in slug flow, as depicted in voids, more gas is continually introduced
Figure I b where the foot piece is simply to establish a steady state of refluxing of
a gas injection nozzle. upwardly displaced liquid. The net rate of
In practice, multiport injectors have conveyance or refluxing decreases with
been found to be more efficient (22) in height of lift. If the pipe is cut off at some
terms of increased capacity, particularly height, below the maximum commensu
in the bubbling and slug-flow regimes. rate with the given gas rate, or of the dif-
Vo �
t ri-VL
' .
-.,.o · > .
.
·. ·· · ·
:'��' A= Pii>u cross·seelion, sq. h.
D PiJ!e Ld� inches ·
l .. Lilt. h.
"
..
S .. Submerguncu, h.
_·
.
p6 Gas density
. .
PL = Fluid density
;' • • • .... :
. �. " f
101 101
' . \· , :,_•'
. .
.
'· f: .'�t,� · .. - '..' .
Vo'· VL."
-
, , •
--.:....
ference in hydraulic head, then the despite the fact that air lift represent then the data in Figure 2 yield a fam
net rate of liquid at that height will overall a net cocurrent , rather than ily of parallel curves spaced accord
be continuously expelled from the countercurrent, flow. ing to the square root of the lift
pipe and hence the action referred to In Figure 2 gas volume and gas height. Multiplying the ordinate and
as a lift "pump." density are based on discharge con dividing the abscissa by the square
ditions; within a long lift pipe these root of L results in the correlation of
could vary significantly from inlet to Figure 2.
Experimental air-lift data discharge. However, the significance
Figure 2 displays a variety of pub of "corrections" to the data in Figure
Ii shed a i r-lift data c overing lift 2 would be difficult to evaluate justi Effect of fluid density
heights ranging from 5 in. to 65 ft fiably when even the best data are Since all the data in Figure 2 are
and pipe diameters from � in. to 15 subject to experimental error and to based on lifting water, the question
in. The curves drawn through each the effects of the air injection arrang arises as to how well this correlation
investi gator's results f all into a ments (22). would satisfy other fluids. The ordi
numerical sequence with height of The submergence term, S, in the nate should be modified by consid
lift. The basis for the choice of coor denomin at or of the ordinate of ering that increased liquid density
dinates in Figure 2 lays principally in Figure 2 is based on analogy to cor would logically result in reducing
their ability to correlate maximum relating data on entrainment from the effective volumetric yield, or
countercurrent dilute phase-dense distillation trays (25). It also reflects conversely giving the same wieght
phase flow through empty vertical the work expanded in compressing yield at equal air rates. Chamberlain
tubes and packed towers (23,24). the air in an air lift. If S is replaced (2) obtained air-lift data for both
T hat these coordinates yield a plot as by log [(S + 34)/34 ] which is pro , water and a 93.5 lb/ft3 caustic solu
organized in Figure 2 lends credibili portional to the work of compression tion in the same pipe; his data are
ty to this approach to correlation, and still reflects the submergence, plotted in Figure 3 and show excel-
E= WJW1 (3 )
Since Pa= 34 ft of water or 14.7 psia, 106
P may be expressed as 34 + S, where
S is the submergence in ft, so that �
-
Data of Chamberlain
[) = 1.6"
L= 10ft.
E= W,. UPa VG In (PIP0) (4)
(See Equations A, 5 and 6.) The pub Band of data
lished version of the Ingersoll-Rand - in figure 3. •Figure
equations is simply Eq. 6 with the 3.Effecto/
term (469 E) replaced by a constant fluid
o S = 10ft. at PL= 62.4 density.
which in effect amounts to assigning '
• Self= 1 Sft. at PL = 93.5
a value to E. Operationaily deter
. .
1 to 100 1,000
maximum operating efficiency, as
given in Table 1 (26). Vo�
From the Ingersoll-Rand equation A VDLPL
1oe----�---�,-----.
Ingersoll-Rand
equation -,..___,.,...,,
'.·� 10Wgt % Sand Fluid
::· . soWgt % Water Rate
E=50% ·
PG=0.0765
Air Air
Rate Rate
Pr= 62.4
101"'========='====�
' 10 100 1,000
VG j4iP;
A v 0LPr
•Figure 4. Significance ofthe Ingersoll
Rand equation. •Figure S. A ir-lift examples.
10&
water (that is, PL = 62.4; Pa =
�I�
now, sq. ft. c
105
A = pipe cross-sectional area. sq. ft. Equation 9 is shown in
D pipe inside diameter, in. F i g u r e 4 as s up e r i m- - I,
2 '" �? ,
=
�
VG
= gas now at discharge conditions, efficiency. T h e c u r v e
I rT
ft'lmin b ased on experimental .
VL
= dense phase now. gal/min data exhibits this same 103
w, pounds of dense ph11SC lifted per slope at only one point, >'I< Mist �
minute but then curves away to
w, worlc input ft-lb/min
yield lower water-to-air
w.. work output ft.lb/min
ratios at values of the abscissa
=
entipoise
vertical upjlow regimes.
lift only under conditions of peak
�
= surface tension of lifted fluid,
theoretical effici ency, b u t n o t Examples ;'.
dynes/cm
over the entire range of possible Consider the operable gas-liquid
P1 = density of lifted fluid, lb/ft'
operating conditions . Figures 3 solids ratios for two situations illus
Po gas density. lb/ft'
a n d 4 i n c o r p o r a t e as w e l l the trated in Figure 5:
Pt liquid density. lb/ft'
effect of fluids of densities other 1. Air l ifting of water 30 ft
than water. through a 6 in. pipe submerged 50 ft.
•Equation D
Lp/ (1 - e}.162.4
At values of the abscissa greater
than about 50, and to the right of the
curve in Figure 4, voidage must be
so great that liquid can only be dri
ven up the pipe in annular flow by
the surface drag of the gas core. This
region has been explored in some
detail by Dukler and others (29.30)
� -·: :,.'.,:-.-
td.io_se portions of this article developed under 'a> (July 30, 1980). :-;:\;,·-
;'.;c-Ontract with Union C a rbide Corporation ls:� 20. Chem. Eng p. 20 (No'
. •
1980 ).
';1ir3t�rUlly acknowledged. . . ))' :-·
(May 1965).
J�
'��JMS,.Garrison, NY (914/424·3220; Fax: 914/414���. 22. Morrison, G. L., et · ·
,
' )_a non· profit industrial consortiu m:](''\' Res., 26, 387-391 (19 "
23. York, J, L., et al., ;··'
.. ,.•
ow"of the AIChE, the 1985 recipianf i>t � 88(10), pp. 93-98'(('
ljfrm
d in chemical engineering p����. 24. Zenz, F. A., and ·. �
�).$86 recipient of Chemical Engi11i�T,tJ8!Jl: Hydocarbon Proc .
-�. anal Achievement Award. In the p��t�PJt pp. 121-126 (1965):{
. .he has authored 90 papers, 2bookS, 19 U�Sit 25. Schweitzer, P. A;,·
:l
�� mot[' •-,,. .
_
�'.
•. ·
1
were approaching slugging and that this Upward Gas-Uqui4.F.'!J
Vertical Tubes,':'Al
limit should at some time be established on
pp. 345.354 (1980).�::t..,
Figure 6 experimentally. The addition of
31. Baker,o.,0;1'&diii ,: '" ·
liquid viscosity and particularly surface ten 195, 53(12)(July 26$f
sion terms to the ordinate of Figure 6 has
·