NEO PI-3 Interp RPT Sample Report
NEO PI-3 Interp RPT Sample Report
Interpretive Report
Developed By
Client Information
Results For : Sample Client
Client ID : Sample 1234
Age : 41
Date of Birth : 08/01/1969
Gender : Female
Test Form : S (NEO-PI-3)
Test Date : 08/01/2010
____________________________
Normative Group : Adult / Gender Specific
The following report is based on research using adult and adolescent samples and is intended to
provide information on the basic dimensions of personality. The interpretive information
contained in this report should be viewed as only one source of hypotheses about the individual
being evaluated. No decisions should be based solely on the information contained in this report.
This material should be integrated with all other sources of information in reaching professional
decisions about this individual. This report is confidential and intended for use by qualified
professionals only; it should not be released to the individual being evaluated. “Your NEO-PI-3
Summary” provides a report in lay terms that may be appropriate for feedback to the client.
Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR), Inc. / 16204 North Florida Ave. / Lutz, FL 33549 / 1.800.331.8378 / www.parinc.com
NEO™-PI-3: Interpretive Report Copyright © 1985, 1988, 1992, 1994, 2000, 2010 by Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR), Inc. All rights
reserved. May not be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any means without written permission of Psychological Assessment
Resources, Inc.
Version: 2.00 ( 3.00.024 )
T-Score
≥ 80
≥ 80
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
≤ 20
≤ 20
N
E
O
A
C
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
O1
O2
O3
O4
O5
O6
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
Client: Sample Client Test Date: 08/01/2010 Client ID: Sample 1234 Page 3 of 17
Factors
Neuroticism Facets
Extraversion Facets
Openness Facets
Agreeableness Facets
Conscientiousness Facets
Validity Indices
Validity indices (i.e., A and C questions, total number of items missing, and response set) are
within normal limits.
Basis of Interpretation
This report compares the respondent to other adult women. It is based on self-reports of the
respondent.
At the broadest level, personality can be described in terms of five basic dimensions or factors.
NEO-PI-3 domain scores provide good estimates of these five factors by summing the six facets
in each domain. Domain scores can be calculated easily by hand and are therefore used on the
(hand-scored) Profile Form. More precise estimates of standing on the five factors, however, are
provided by factor scores, which are a weighted combination of scores on all 30 facets (see Table
4 in the NEO™ Inventories Professional Manual). Factor scores are best calculated by computer.
Because factor scores have somewhat higher convergent and discriminant validity, they are used
as the basis of this report. In general, domain T scores and factor T scores are very similar;
occasionally, however, they differ. In these cases, the factor T score, which incorporates
information from all 30 facets, is usually a more accurate description of the individual.
Factor scores are used to describe the individual at a global level, based on a composite of facet
scale scores. To the extent that there is wide scatter among facet scores within a domain,
interpretation of that domain and factor becomes more complex. Interpretive statements at the
factor level may occasionally conflict with interpretive statements at the facet level. In these
cases, particular attention should be focused on the facet scales and their interpretations.
introversion does not imply introspection; these individuals are likely to be thoughtful and
reflective only if they are also high in Openness.
Next, consider the individual's level of Openness. Very low scorers like her have a strong
preference for the familiar and pragmatic. They like routine and are set in their ways, with little
desire for change in themselves or their world. They are generally not responsive to inner
feelings and are unmoved by art and beauty. Their respect for authority and their reluctance to
question established values may make them defenders of tradition. Peers rate such people as
down-to-earth, conforming, unadventurous, and conventional. Closed individuals, as a rule, do
not have many intellectual interests. However, this does not mean that they lack intellectual
ability; it means only that they tend to direct their intelligence to a narrow circle of problems that
are important to them.
This person is average in Conscientiousness. Women who score in this range have a normal level
of need for achievement. They are able to set work/school aside in pursuit of pleasure or
recreation. They are moderately well organized and fairly reliable, and have an average amount
of self-discipline.
Finally, the individual scores in the average range in Agreeableness. People who score in this
range are about as good-natured as the average person. They can be sympathetic, but can also be
firm. They are trusting but not gullible, and ready to compete as well as to cooperate with others.
Extraversion
This person is somewhat formal and distant in her relationships with others and she rarely enjoys
large and noisy crowds or parties. She is reluctant to assert herself and prefers to stay in the
background in meetings and group discussions. The individual has a low level of energy and
prefers a slow and steady pace. Excitement, stimulation, and thrills have little appeal to her and
she is less prone to experience feelings of joy and happiness than most women.
Openness
In experiential style, this individual is generally closed. She considers daydreaming and fantasy
a waste of time, and has a limited imagination. She is seldom responsive to beauty as found in
music, art, poetry, or nature, but her feelings and emotional reactions are normal in variety and
intensity. She seldom enjoys new and different activities and has a low need for variety in her
life. She is not interested in intellectual pursuits for their own sake and she is conservative in her
social, political, and moral beliefs.
Agreeableness
This person has moderate trust in others, but is not gullible, recognizing that people can
sometimes be deceptive. She is willing at times to flatter or trick people into doing what she
wants, and she tends to put her own needs and interests before others'. This individual holds her
own in conflicts with others, but she is also willing to forgive and forget. She is humble,
unassuming, and uncomfortable talking about her achievements. Compared to other people, she
is hard-headed and tough-minded, and her social and political attitudes reflect her pragmatic
realism.
Conscientiousness
This individual is sometimes inefficient or unprepared, and has not developed her skills and
talents fully. She can be sloppy and disorganized, and she is sometimes less dependable and
reliable and more likely to bend the rules than she should be. She has limited aspirations and
might be considered somewhat lackadaisical or lazy. She sometimes finds it difficult to make
herself do what she should, and tends to quit when tasks become too difficult. She is reasonably
cautious, and generally thinks things through before acting.
Somatic Complaints
This person may be overly sensitive in monitoring and responding to physical problems and
illnesses. In medical evaluations, it may be particularly important to seek objective confirmation
of symptom reports where possible.
Client: Sample Client Test Date: 08/01/2010 Client ID: Sample 1234 Page 7 of 17
Psychological Well-being
Although her mood and satisfaction with various aspects of her life will vary with the
circumstances, in the long run this individual is likely to be more sensitive to life's problems than
its rewards, and so be relatively unhappy. Because she is closed to experience, her moods may be
less intense and varied than those of the average woman.
Cognitive Processes
This individual is likely to be less complex and differentiated in thoughts, values, and moral
judgments than others of her level of intelligence and education. She would also probably score
lower on measures of ego development.
Interpersonal Characteristics
Many theories propose a circular arrangement of interpersonal traits around the axes of Love and
Status. Within such systems, this person would likely be described as modest, submissive, cold,
unfeeling, and especially aloof and reserved. Her traits are associated with low standing on the
interpersonal dimensions of Love and Status.
Axis II Disorders
Personality traits are most directly relevant to the assessment of personality disorders coded on
Axis II of the DSM-IV. A patient may have a personality disorder in addition to an Axis I
disorder, and may meet criteria for more than one personality disorder. Certain diagnoses are
more common among individuals with particular personality profiles; this section calls attention
to diagnoses that are likely (or unlikely) to apply.
Borderline Personality Disorder. The most common personality disorder in clinical practice is
Borderline, and the mean NEO-PI-3 profile of a group of patients diagnosed as having
Borderline Personality Disorder provides a basis for evaluating the patient. Profile agreement
between the patient and this mean profile is higher than 90% of subjects in the NEO PI-R
normative sample, suggesting that the patient may have Borderline features or a Borderline
Personality Disorder.
Other Personality Disorders. Personality disorders can be conceptually characterized by a
prototypic profile of NEO-PI-3 facets that are consistent with the definition of the disorder and
its associated features. The coefficient of profile agreement can be used to assess the overall
similarity of the patient's personality to other DSM-IV personality disorder prototypes.
The patient's scores on N1: Anxiety, N3: Depression, N4: Self-Consciousness, N6:
Vulnerability, E1: Warmth, E2: Gregariousness, E4: Activity, E5: Excitement Seeking, and O4:
Actions suggests the possibility of an Avoidant Personality Disorder. Avoidant Personality
Disorder is relatively common in clinical practice; the patient's coefficient of profile agreement
is higher than 90% of the subjects' in the NEO PI-R normative sample.
The patient's scores on N1: Anxiety, N3: Depression, N4: Self-Consciousness, N6:
Vulnerability, E3: Assertiveness, A3: Altruism, A4: Compliance, A5: Modesty, and C4:
Achievement Striving suggest the possibility of a Dependent Personality Disorder. Dependent
Personality Disorder is relatively common in clinical practice; the patient's coefficient of profile
agreement is higher than 90% of subjects' in the NEO PI-R normative sample.
It is unlikely that the patient has Schizoid Personality Disorder or Histrionic Personality
Disorder because the patient's coefficients of profile agreement are lower than 50% of the
subjects' in the NEO PI-R normative sample.
Treatment Implications
Like most individuals in psychotherapy, this patient is high in Neuroticism. She is likely to
experience a variety of negative emotions and to be distressed by many problems, and mood
regulation may be an important treatment focus. Very high Neuroticism scores are associated
with a poor prognosis and treatment goals should be appropriately modest.
Because she is introverted, this patient probably finds it difficult to talk about her problems, and
may be uncomfortable interacting with others. She may prefer more direct therapy that requires
less spontaneous verbalization, and would probably prefer individual to group therapy.
This patient is closed to experience, and may have misgivings about the experience of
psychotherapy. She tends to be pragmatic and literal-minded, and unused to discussing her
feelings. Directive techniques, advice, and behavior modification are likely to be techniques the
patient will easily understand. By contrast, free association, imagery, and more esoteric forms of
therapy may be met with resistance.
Client: Sample Client Test Date: 08/01/2010 Client ID: Sample 1234 Page 9 of 17
Stability of Profile
Research suggests that the individual's personality profile is likely to be stable throughout
adulthood. Barring catastrophic stress, major illness, or therapeutic intervention, this description
will probably serve as a fair guide even in old age.
NEO-PI-3 Item Responses
Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp. Item Rsp.
10. A 34. A 58. A 82. SD 106. D 130. A 154. A 178. N 202. A 226. SA
11. SD 35. N 59. SD 83. D 107. D 131. A 155. N 179. A 203. D 227. D
12. D 36. SA 60. A 84. D 108. SD 132. SD 156. D 180. A 204. A 228. A
13. A 37. SD 61. SD 85. D 109. N 133. N 157. D 181. SD 205. N 229. A
14. D 38. A 62. A 86. A 110. A 134. N 158. D 182. D 206. D 230. D
15. A 39. A 63. D 87. A 111. A 135. D 159. N 183. A 207. SA 231. D
16. A 40. A 64. D 88. A 112. SA 136. SA 160. A 184. A 208. A 232. D
17. D 41. SA 65. A 89. D 113. A 137. N 161. A 185. D 209. N 233. N
18. A 42. A 66. A 90. D 114. SA 138. A 162. A 186. A 210. D 234. SD
19. A 43. SD 67. A 91. A 115. D 139. A 163. D 187. D 211. A 235. D
20. SD 44. N 68. D 92. N 116. SD 140. N 164. N 188. D 212. N 236. D
21. A 45. A 69. D 93. A 117. D 141. D 165. A 189. A 213. A 237. D
22. SD 46. SD 70. N 94. A 118. N 142. SD 166. SD 190. A 214. A 238. D
23. SD 47. D 71. SD 95. SA 119. N 143. D 167. N 191. SA 215. N 239. D
24. SD 48. D 72. D 96. D 120. A 144. SD 168. A 192. D 216. SA 240. N
Validity Items
A. SA B. Yes C. Yes
Summary of Responses
SD: 10.42% D: 28.33% N: 16.67% A: 36.67% SA: 7.92% ?: 0.00%
30
20 70 80
20
Style of Defense
Vertical Axis: Neuroticism (= 75 T )
Horizontal Axis: Openness (= 34 T )
N+O- N+O+ Maladaptive Hypersensitive
M f
a e
l c
a ti
d v
a e
p d
ti e
v f
e e
i n
n s
d e
i s
v 8
i 0
d (e.g., repression, denial, reaction formation). They
u prefer not to think about disturbing ideas and
a they may refuse to acknowledge possible
l dangers (e.g., serious illness). They do
s not understand the distressing
t
e
n
d
t
o
u 70
s Hypersensitive individuals seem undefended. They are
e alert to danger and vividly imagine possible misfortunes.
i They may be prone to nightmares. Because they think in
n unusual and creative
e ways, they may sometimes be troubled
f by odd and eccentric ideas.
emotions they experience and they cannot
verbalize their feelings. 30 40 50 50 60
40
20 70 80
20
60
40
against themselves.
20 70 80
N-A- N-A+ Cold-Blooded Easy-Going
Cold-blooded individuals "don't They may seek revenge.
Easy-going individuals are slow to
anger and reluctant to express it
get mad, they get even." They often when it arises. They know when they
take offense, but they are not have been insulted and may raise
overpowered by feelings of anger. Instead, objections, but they would prefer to forgive
they keep accounts and express their and forget. They understand there are two sides to every
animosity at a time and in a way that suits them. issue and try to work toward a common ground in
resolving disputes.
20
30
20 70 80
20
appropriate medical advice or to undertake a difficult
Client: Sample Client NEO Style Graphs Test Date: 08/01/2010 Client ID: Sample 1234 Page 13 of 17 Style of
Interests
Vertical Axis: Extraversion (= 29 T )
Horizontal Axis: Openness (= 34 T )
E+O- E+O+
Mainstream Consumers Creative Interactors
T f
h l
e e
i c
n t
t p
e o
r p
e u
s l
t a
s r
o 8
f 0
t favorites: parties, sports, shopping, blockbuster
h movies -- events where they can enjoy
e themselves with others. They are attracted
s to businesses and jobs that let them
e work with others on simple projects.
i
n
d
i
v
i
d 70
u The interests of these individuals revolve around the
a new and different, and they like to share their
l discoveries with others. They enjoy public speaking and
s teaching, and they fit in well in discussion
r groups. They enjoy meeting people
e from different backgrounds. Pos
Possible vocation: Salesperson.
30 30
20 70 80
Style of Interactions
Vertical Axis: Extraversion (= 29 T )
Horizontal Axis: Agreeableness (= 51 T )
E+A- E+A+ Leaders Welcomers
T o
h n
e s
s a
e s
i a
n n
d a
i r
v e
i n
d a
u i
a n
l 8
s 0
e which they can shine. The prefer giving orders
n versus taking them and believe they are
j particularly well-suited to making
o decisions. They may be boastful and
y vain, but they also know how to get
s
o
c
i
a
l
s 70
i These individuals sincerely enjoy the company of
t others. They are deeply attached to their old friends and
u reach out freely to new ones. They are good natured and
a sympathetic, willing to lend
t an ear and happy to chat about their
i own ideas. They are easy to get
people to work together.
0 40 50 50 60 30
60
40
20 70 80
20
Style of Activity
Vertical Axis: Extraversion (= 29 T )
Horizontal Axis: Conscientiousness (= 46 T )
E+C- E+C+ Funlovers Go-Getters
T h
e t
s a
e l
i i
n t
d y
i ,
v b
i u
d t
u t
a h
l e
s y
a 8
r 0
e find it hard to channel their energy in constructive
f directions. Instead, they prefer to enjoy life
u with thrills, adventures, and raucous
l parties. They are spontaneous and
l impulsive, ready to drop work for
o
f
e
n
e
r
g 70
y These individuals are productive and efficient and work
a with a rapid tempo. They know exactly what needs to be
n done and are eager to pitch in. They might design their
d own self-improvement
v program and follow it with zeal. They
i may seem pushy if they try to
the chance of a good time.
40 50 50 60 30
60
40
20 70 80
20
Style of Attitudes
Vertical Axis: Openness (= 34 T )
Horizontal Axis: Agreeableness (= 51 T )
O+A- O+A+ Free-Thinkers Progressives
T v
h i
e d
s u
e a
i l
n s
d a
i r
e a
c y
r e
i d
t 8
i 0
c neither by tradition nor by sentimentality. They
a consider all views, but then make their own
l judgments about right and wrong. They
t are willing to disregard others' feelings
h to pursue their own idea of the truth.
i
n
k
e
r
s
w 70
h These individuals take a thoughtful approach to social
o problems and are willing to try new solutions. They
a have faith in human nature and are confident that society
r can be improved through
e education, innovation, and coopera
s tion. They believe in reason and
w
30
60
30 40 50 50
being reasonable.
40
20 70 80
20
Client: Sample Client NEO Style Graphs Test Date: 08/01/2010 Client ID: Sample 1234 Page 15 of 17 Style of
Learning
Vertical Axis: Openness (= 34 T )
Horizontal Axis: Conscientiousness (= 46 T )
O+C- O+C+
Dreamers Good Students
T d
h u
e a
s l
e s
i a
n r
d e
i a
v t
i t
r n
a 8
c 0
t develop them with imaginative elaborations, but
e they may get lost in flights of fancy. They are
d good at starting innovative projects, but
t they are less successful in completing
o them and may need help staying
n
e
w
i
d
e
a 70
s Although these individuals are not necessarily more
a intelligent than others, they combine a real love of
n learning with the diligence and organization to excel.
d They have a high aspiration level
c and are often creative in their approach
a to solving problems. They are likely
focused. They are able to tolerate uncertainty
and ambiguity. 30 30
20 70 80
20
Style of Character
Vertical Axis: Agreeableness (= 51 T )
Horizontal Axis: Conscientiousness (= 46 T )
A+C- A+C+ Well-Intentioned Effective Altruists
T n
h g
e ,
s s
e y
i m
n p
d a
i t
v h
i e
d t
u i
a c
l ,
s a
a n
r d
e g
g e
i n
v u
i i
n These individuals work diligently for the benefit of the
e group. They are high in self-discipline and endurance,
l and they channel their efforts to the service of others. As
y volunteers, they are
8 willing to take on difficult or thankless
0 tasks and will stick to them until
concerned about others. However, their lack of
organization and persistence means that they
sometimes fail to follow through on their
good intentions. They may be best at
inspiring kindness and generosity in
70
others.
30 40 50 50 6 30
60
40
20 70 80
20
Neuroticism
N: Neuroticism T score 75
Women scoring in this range may experience the following problems:
◻ Chronic negative affects, including anxiety, fearfulness, tension, irritability, anger,
dejection, hopelessness, guilt, and shame.
◻ Difficulty in inhibiting impulses (e.g., eating, drinking, smoking, spending money).
◻ Irrational beliefs (e.g., unrealistic expectations, perfectionistic demands on self,
unwarranted pessimism).
◻ Unfounded somatic complaints.
◻ Helplessness and dependence on others for emotional support and decision making.
◻ Inability to accept criticism.
◻ Emotional instability; mood swings.
◻ Unstable relationships.