Address:-Ashok Yakkaldevi 258/34, Raviwar Peth, Solapur - 413 005 Maharashtra, India1Cell: 9595 359

435, Ph No: 02172372010 Email: [email protected]

Website: www.aygrt.isrj.org

Available online at www.lsrj.in

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patriarchy and Women’s Subordination:a Theoretical Analysis

Research Scholar: Subhalaxmi
Research Supervisor: Dr. S K Sharma

Introduction
Patriarchy is the prime obstacle to women‟s advancement and development. Despite
differences in levels of domination the broad principles remain the same, i.e. men are in
control. The nature of this control may differ. So it is necessary to understand the system,
which keeps women dominated and subordinate, and to unravel its workings in order to work
for women‟s development in a systematic way. In the modern world where women go ahead
by their merit, patriarchy there creates obstacles for women to go forward in society. Because
patriarchal institutions and social relations are responsible for the inferior or secondary status
of women. Patriarchal society gives absolute priority to men and to some extent limits
women‟s human rights also. Patriarchy refers to the male domination both in public and
private spheres. In this way, feminists use the term „patriarchy‟ to describe the power
relationship between men and women as well as to find out the root cause of women‟s
subordination. This article, hence, is an attempt to analyse the concept of patriarchy and
women‟s subordination in atheoretical perspective.

The Objective of the Study and Procedure

Modern civilization is the result of joint action of men and women. No nation can
progress without the help of women. Now a days women are seen in positions of power.
There are queens and prime ministers with constitutional control or virtual, and women in
general have wrested benefits in greater or smaller measures. But all this does not change the
fact that the system is male dominated and women are merely accommodated in it in a variety
of ways. So the main purpose of the study is to analyse patriarchy and women‟s
subordination. The paper consists of four sections. The first section defines the key concept
of „patriarchy‟ with its origin. The second section deals with women‟s subordination and
factors that men control in a patriarchal system, in other words, how patriarchy benefits men
materially. The third section examines the patriarchal structures of Bangladesh and how this
system undermines women‟s position. Finally, some suggestions have been forwarded to
raise women‟s position in the society. Concluding remarks are included in this section. This
article is written entirely on the basis of secondary sources that include review of books,
journals, proceedings of seminars and other secondary materials.

Concept of Patriarchy
The word „patriarchy‟ literally means the rule of the father or the ‘patriarch’, and
originally it was used to describe a specific type of „male-dominated family‟ – the large

1
household of the patriarch which included women, junior men, children, slaves2and domestic
servants all under the rule of this dominant male. Now it is used more generally “to refer to
male domination, to the power relationships by which men dominate women, and to
characterise a system whereby women are kept subordinate in a number of ways” (Bhasin
2006:3).
Patriarchy refers to the male domination both in public and private spheres. Feminists
mainly use the term „patriarchy‟ to describe the power relationship between men and women.
Thus, patriarchy is more than just a term; feminists use it like a concept, and like all other
concepts it is a tool to help us understand women‟s realities.
The concept of patriarchy is defined by different thinkers in different ways. Mitchell,
a feminist psychologist, uses the word patriarchy “to refer to kinship systems in which men
exchange women” (Mitchell 1971:24). Walby defines “patriarchy as a system of social
structures and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women” (Walby
1990:20). She explains patriarchy as a system because this helps us to reject the notion of
biological determinism (which says that men and women are naturally different because
of their biology or bodies and, are, therefore assigned different roles) or “the notion that
every individual man is always in a dominant position and every woman in a subordinate
one” (Ibid).
Patriarchy, in its wider definition, means the manifestation and institutionalization of
male dominance over women and children in the family and the extension of male
dominance over women in society in general. It implies that “men hold power in all the
important institutions of society” and that “women are deprived of access to such power”.
However, it does not imply that “women are either totally powerless or totally deprived of
rights, influence, and resources” (Lerner 1989:239).

Thus, patriarchy describes the institutionalized system of male dominance. So we can

usefully define patriarchy as a set of social relations between men and women, which have a
material base, and which, though hierarchical, establish or create independence and solidarity
among men that enable them to dominate women (Jagger and Rosenberg 1984). Patriarchal
ideology exaggerates biological differences between men and women, making certain that
men always have the dominant, or masculine, roles and women always have the subordinate
or feminine ones. This ideology is so powerful that “men are usually able to secure the
apparent consent of the very women they oppress”. They do this “through institutions such as
the academy, the church, and the family, each of which justifies and reinforces women‟s
subordination to men” (Millett 1977:35). The patriarchal system is characterized by power,
dominance, hierarchy, and competition. So patriarchy is a system of social structures and
practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women.

Origin of Patriarchy
Regarding the existence and origin of patriarchy, traditionalists do believe that men
are born to dominate and women to be subordinate. They believe that this hierarchy has
always existed and will continue, and like other rules of nature this one too cannot be
changed. There are others who challenge these beliefs and say that patriarchy is not natural
it is man-made and, therefore,it can be changed.

In this regard, Aristotle propounded similar “theories” and called males active,
females passive. For him female was “mutilated male”, someone who does not have a soul. In

2
 3
his view, the biological inferiority of woman makes her inferior also in her capacities, her
ability to reason and, therefore, her ability to make decisions. Because man is superior and
woman inferior, he is born to rule and she to be ruled. He said “the courage of man is shown
in commanding of a woman in obeying” (Learner 1989:8-11).

According to modern psychology, women‟s biology determines their psychology

and, therefore, their abilities and roles. Sigmund Freud, for example, stated that for women
anatomy is destiny. In hisview, normal human was male (Freud 1977).
But these theories of male supremacy have been challenged and it has been proved
that there is no historical or scientific evidence for such explanations. There are indeed
biological differences between men and women but these distinctions do not have to become
the basis of a sexual hierarchy in which men are dominant. The analysis of many of these
theories enables us to recognise that patriarchy is man-made; historical processes have
created it. No single explanation of the origin of patriarchy is accepted by all. Here, I will
present only some of the principal theories put forward, and that too, very briefly.

A very important explanation for the origin of patriarchy was given by Frederick
Engels in 1884 in his book, The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State (Engels
1940). Engels believed that women‟s subordination began with the development of private
property, when according to him, the world historical defeat of the female sex took place. He
says both the division of classes and the subordination of women developed historically.
At that stage when private property arose in the society men wanted to retain power
and property, and pass it on to their own children. To ensure this inheritance, mother-right
was overthrown. In order to establish the right of the father, women had to be domesticated
and confined and their sexuality regulated and controlled. According to Engels, it was in this
period, both patriarchy and monogamy for women were established.

According to the radical feminists (Brownmiller 1976, Firestone 1974), patriarchy

preceded private property. They believe that the original and basic contradiction is between
the sexes and not between economic classes. Radical feminists consider all women to be a
class. Unlike the traditionalists, however, they do not believe that patriarchy is natural or
that it has always existedand will continue to do so.
Socialist feminists accept and use the basic principles of Marxism but have tried to
enrich and extend it by working on areas which, they believe, were neglected by conventional
Marxist theory. They do not consider patriarchy to be a universal or unchanging system
because of their commitment to a historical, materialist method as well as of their own
observation of variety in the sexual division of labour. Socialist feminists view the struggle
between women and men as changing historically with changes in modes of production
(Beechey 1977).
Hartmann (1981) looks at the link between patriarchy and capitalism and argues that
patriarchy links all men to each other irrespective of their class. A woman‟s work benefits
both capital and her husband. Hartmann defines patriarchy as a set of relations which has a
material base and in which there are hierarchical relations between men and solidarity among
them, which in turn enable them to dominate women. The material base of patriarchy is
men‟s control over women‟s labour power.

Another important „socialist feminist view‟ has been presented by Mies (1988) in a
paper entitled, The Social Origins of the Sexual Division of Labour. She puts forward some

3
 4
ideas regarding the possible reasons for and the sequence of historical developments leading
to the origin of gender hierarchy or patriarchy. In this paper, she says, whatever the
ideological differences between the various feminist groups, they are united in their rebellion
against this hierarchical relationship between menand women, which is no longer accepted
as biological destiny. Their enquiry into the social foundations of this inequality and
asymmetry is the necessary consequence of their rebellion.

According to Mies, male-ness and female-ness are not biological givens, but rather
the result of a long historical process. In each historic epoch male-ness and female-ness
are differently defined, the definition depending on the principal mode of production in those
epochs. This means that the organic differences between women and men are differently
interpreted and valued, according to the dominant form of appropriation of natural matter for
the satisfaction of human needs. According to Mies, women were the first producers of life,
of social production, of the first tools of production and if they were also the first to initiate
social relations, why were they unable to prevent the establishment of an hierarchical and
exploitative relationship between the sexes? She answers this by saying that male supremacy,
far from being a consequence of men‟s superior economic contribution, was a result of the
development and control of destructive tools through which they controlled women, nature
and other men.

According to Lerner (1989), patriarchy was not one event but a process developing
over a period of almost 2500 years (from approximately 3100 BC to 600 BC) and a number
of factors and forces that were responsible for the establishment of male supremacy as we see
it today. Gerda Lerner (1989), begins by emphasizing the importance of women history in
women‟s struggle against patriarchy and for equality. According to her, patriarchy, in fact,
preceded the formation of private property and class society.
One socialist feminist school of thought prefers to use the concept of subordination of
women rather than patriarchy, which they reject as being historical. Patriarchy, according to
them, is neither universal nor an all embracing phenomenon as differentkinds of relationships
have always existed between men and women in history. According to them, it is not sex but
gender which is important; sex is biological, gender is social. This group is concerned with
what they call gender relations (Oakley 1972).

The search for the social origins of this relationship is part of the political strategy
of women‟s emancipation. Without understanding the foundation and the functioning of the
asymmetricrelationship between men and women it is not possible to overcomeit.

Women’s Subordination
Patriarchy, which pre-supposes the natural superiority of male over female,
shamelessly upholds women‟s dependence on, and subordination to, man in all spheres of
life. Consequently, all the power and authority within the family, the society and the state
remain entirely in the hands of men. So, due to patriarchy, women were deprived of their
legal rights and opportunities patriarchal values restrict women‟s mobility, reject their
freedom over themselves as well as their property.

Subordination means, “something else is less important than the other thing” (Cobuild
2010:1559). According to Advanced Learners Dictionary, “subordination means having less
power or authority than somebody else in a group or an organization” (Hornby 2003:1296).

4
 The term „women‟s subordination‟ refers to the inferior position of women,
5 their lack
of access to resources and decision making etc. and to the patriarchal domination that women
are subjected to in most societies. So, women‟s subordination means the inferior position
of women to men. The feeling of powerlessness, discrimination and experience of limited
self esteem and self-confidence jointly contribute to the subordination of women. Thus,
women‟s subordination is a situation, where a power relationship exists and men dominate
women. The subordination of women is a central feature of all structures of interpersonal
domination, but feminists choose different locations and causes of subordination.
Contemporary feminist theory begins with Simone de Beauvoir‟s argument that because men
view women as fundamentally different from themselves, women are reduced to the status of
the second sex and hence subordinate (Beauvior 1974). Kate Millet‟s theory of subordination
argues that women are adependent sex class under patriarchal domination (Millet 1977).

Patriarchy is a system whereby women are kept subordinate in a number of ways. The
subordination that we experience at a daily level, regardless of the class we might belong to,
takes various forms – discrimination, disregard, insult, control, exploitation, oppression,
violence – within the family, at the place of work, in society. For instance, a few examples
are illustrated here to represent a specific form of discrimination and a particular aspect of
patriarchy. Such as, son preference, discrimination against girls in food distribution, burden
of household work on women and young girls, lack of educational opportunities for girls,
lack of freedom and mobility for girls, wife battering, male control over women and girls,
sexual harassment at workplace, lack of inheritance or property rights for women, male
control over women‟s bodies and sexuality, no control over fertility or reproductive rights.
So, the norms and practices that define women as inferior to men, impose controls on-
them, are present everywhere in our families, social relations, religious, laws, schools,
textbooks, media, factories, offices. Thus, patriarchy is called the sum of the kind of male
domination we see around women all the time. In this ideology, men are superior to women
and women are part of men‟s property, so women should be controlled by men and this
produces women‟s subordination. In this context, Gerda Lerner in her book The Creation of
Patriarchy said, “The use of the phrase subordination of women instead of the word
“oppression” has distinct advantages. Subordination does not have the connotation of evil
intent on the part of the dominant; it allows for the possibilityof collusion between him and
the subordinate. It includes the possibility of voluntary acceptance of subordinate status in
exchange of protection and privilege, a condition which characterizes so much of the
historical experience of women. I will use the term “paternalistic dominance” for this
relation. “Subordination” encompasses other relations in addition to “paternalistic
dominance” and has the additional advantage over “oppression” of being neutral as to the
causes of subordination(Learner 1989:234-235).

Subordination is the situation in which one is forced to stay under the control of other.
So women‟s subordination means the social situation in which women are forced to stay
under the control of men. In this way to keep women under men‟s control, patriarchy operates
some social customs, traditions and social roles by socialization process. To preserve the
male supremacy, patriarchy created „masculine‟ and „feminine‟ characteristics, private-public
realms by gendered socialization process. Socialization is considered to take place primarily
during childhood, when boys andgirls learn the appropriate behaviour for their sex. All agents
of socialization process such as the family, religion, the legal system, the economic system
and political system, the educational institutions and the media are the pillars of a patriarchal
system and structure. The use of the term “social structure” is important here, since it clearly

5
 6
implies rejection both of biological determinism, and the notion that every individual man is
in a dominant position and every women in a subordinate one. “In this system women‟s
labour power, women‟s reproduction, women‟s sexuality, women‟s mobility and property
and other economic resources – are under patriarchal control” (Walby 1990:20).

This control over and exploitation of areas of women‟s lives mean that men benefit
materially from patriarchy, they derive concrete economic gains from the subordination of
women. In what Walby calls the “patriarchal mode of production” (Ibid), women‟s labour is
expropriated by their husbands and others who live there. She says housewives are the
producing class, while husbands are the expropriating class, their back-breaking, endless and
repetitive labour is not considered work at all and housewives are seen to be dependent on
their husbands. So, there is a material basis for patriarchy. Most property and other
productive resources are controlled by men and they pass from one man to another, usually
from father to son. Even where women have the legal right to inherit such assets, a whole
array of customary practices, emotional pressures, social sanctions and sometimes, plain
violence, prevent them from acquitting actual control over them. In other cases, personal laws
curtail their rights, rather than enhance them. In all cases, they are disadvantaged. So the
material base of patriarchy, then, does not rest solely on child bearing in the family but on all
the social structures that enable men to control women‟s labour.

Patriarchal ideology to keep women away the power systems has been attempted
through the construction of private and public realms for women and men respectively.
Theories of patriarchy by Walby shows “two distinct forms of patriarchy – private and public
patriarchy” (Walby 1990:24).

Private patriarchy is based upon household production as the main site of women‟s
oppression. Public patriarchy is based principally in public sites such as employment and the
state. The household does not cease to be a patriarchal structure in the public form, but it is
no longer the chief site. In private patriarchy the expropriation of women‟s labour takes
place primarily byindividual patriarchs within the household, while in the public form it is a
more collective appropriation. In private patriarchy the principle patriarchal strategy is
exclusionary, in the public it is segregationist and subordinating. Above all, “the state has a
systematic bias towards patriarchal interests in its policies and actions” (Walby 1990:21).

In this system, different kinds of violence may be used to control and subjugate
women, such violence by men may even be considered legitimate and women are always
routinely experienced by male violence. Male violence is systematically condoned and
legitimated by the states refusal to intervene against it except in exceptional instance. Due to
such violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse, female foeticide, dowry murders, wife-
beating) and the continued sense of insecurity that is instilled in women as a result keeps
them bound to the home, economically exploited and socially suppressed.

In this patriarchal system, men and women behave, think, and aspire differently
because they have been taught to think of masculinity and femininity in ways which
condition difference. Patriarchal system shows in or accept that men have, or should have,
one set of qualities and characteristics, and women another. Such as „masculine‟ qualities
(strength, bravery, fearlessness, dominance, competitiveness etc.) and „feminine‟ qualities
(caring, nurturing, love, timidity, obedience etc.).

Hartmann (1981) argues that both house work and wage labour are important sites of
women‟s exploitation by men. Within the field of paid work occupational segregation is used

6
by organized men to keep access to the best paid jobs for themselves at the 7 expense of
women. Within the household women do more labour than men, even if they also have paid
employment (Hartmann, 1981a). These two forms of expropriation also act to reinforce each
other, since women‟s disadvantaged position in paid work makes them vulnerable in making
marriage arrangements, and their position in the family disadvantages them in paid work.

According to Lim (1997:220), patriarchy is the system of male domination and female
subordination in economy, society and culture that has characterized much of human history
to the present day. Patriarchal institutions and social relations are responsible for the inferior
or secondary status of women in the capitalist wage- labour market. The primacy of the
sexual division of labour within the family has several consequences for the women who seek
wage employment.

Patriarchal Structures in Bangladesh

Discrimination against women constitutes a subordinate position of women and a
violation of basic human rights and is an obstacle to the achievements of the objectives of
women‟s equality, development and peace. In the last two decades, discrimination against
women emerged as one of the most visible and articulated social issues in Bangladesh which
generates women‟s subordination. Male domination and women‟s subordination are the basic
tents of Bangladeshi social structure. All forms of discrimination constitutes the social,
political, economical, religious and cultural differences between men and women and
establish male dominated society. It also eliminates women‟s equality with men, forms
women‟s subordination and constructs a social system which produce women‟s
subordination.

The systems of patriarchy in Bangladesh are commonly identified by “patrilineal

descent” (influence of patriarchy) and patrilocal residence (i.e. the practice of women living
with their husband‟s relatives after marriage) (Rendall 1982:15-34). Patrilineal descent in
Bangladesh is mainly organized along the patrilineal lines, “which has direct consequences to
the position of women in the society” (Monsoor 1999:32). A boy is the perpetrator of the
patriline, he will inherit the family name. On the other hand, a girl is treated as subordinate
to men and of no or little value.

After marriage a girl goes to her husband‟s house. So our families think that girls are
burden for them. Sons will earn and will look after their parents. So the oppression of a girl
starts from her family. As a wife comes to her husband‟s house after marriage, so her
husband thinks that she is in a subordinate position and he is more powerful than her. So,
here a girl is also oppressed and discriminated. This experience of subordination destroys
women‟s self-respect, self-confidence and self-esteem and sets limits on their aspirations.

Women‟s dependency upon and subordination to men is conditioned by a whole range

of institutional practices embedded in the family and the Kin-group. It is these aspects which
provide the constituent elements of the well-documented system of patriarchy in Bangladesh
which institutionalizes the female subordination of women and their structured dependency
on men.

Some examples of patriarchy in Bangladesh are as the following:

 In Bangladesh, people mostly prefer new born male children to female. When a woman
gives birth to a girl her husband and other members of the family start to oppress and
undermine her and the child.

7
 Discrimination against girls in the domestic menu, food distribution is still8 a common
feature in maximum household. Probably for lack of food and care in Bangladesh
maternal mortality rate is high.
 Burden of household work is mostly on the women and young girls, while men are
executed on the plea of their economic activities. But patriarchal society like Bangladesh
has no recognition to this work.
 Girls have to cope with lack of educational opportunities because their parents think
education is primarily necessary for the male children. In patriarchal society, a woman
from her childhood doesnot get equal chance witha boy to develop her qualities.
 Lack of freedom and mobility for girls is another main feature of patriarchy in
Bangladesh. They can not go out to work, meet with their friends or come back any time,
they have to return home before dusk.
 Wife battering is quite common in the country. Patriarchal norms that naturalize domestic
violence are not freestanding, they are embedded in a larger culture of discipline.
 Sexual harassment at workplace is another common feature. Many women workers are
thrown out of their job when they are not willing to give in to the demands of theirbosses.
 Women face discrimination of inheritance or property rights. In the Muslim families of
Bangladesh sisters get half of their brothers‟ share while Hindu women get nothing. Only
Christian women get equal share of property like-their brothers. But in this social
structure of the patriarchal family women are deprived of their property rights which are
granted.
 Male control over the female body or gross sexuality is a common feature.
 Women possess no control over fertility or reproductive rights. It is mostly the husbands
who decide on family planning methods.
 In most cases, women have no rights to choose their husbands; rather the male members
of their families impose decisions on them. After marriage, women are traditionally not
allowed to provide support to their own relatives.
 In our patriarchal society, woman has to cover her self fully with cloth which is called
purdah. We know the justification for purdah, beyond the Quranic verses on modesty
which are clearly applicable to both sexes. But patriarchal structure operate this purdah
on women‟s voice and movement to keep women in private place. Thus, purdah is a
complex institution that entails much more than restrictions on women‟s physical
mobility and dress.

It is observed that all practices and structures support women‟s subordination in practice
which undermine women‟s position in Bangladesh. As Mahtab stated, in Bangladesh, women
bear many ofthe marks of a “disadvantaged minority” in the social, economicand political
realms. The traditional society of Bangladesh is permeated with patriarchal values and norms
of female subordination, subservience, subjugation and segregation. The reality of the
women of Bangladesh, (most specifically, the rural poor women and those living in the urban
slums) is that they remain a vulnerable, marginalized group that is yet to enjoy equality in
status, and access to services and resources with male counterparts. Women are found at the
“bottom rung of poverty, illiteracy, and landlessness.” (Mahtab 2007:20-21). Women are the
most affected by negative impacts resulting from discrimination at birth leading to deprivation
of access to all opportunities and benefits in family and societal life, such as education and
health. This puts them in the most disadvantageous position and also the victims of worst
forms of violence Some advancement of women does not prove that women are not
subordinated. Though some changes have occurred, but such changes are marginal,
superficial modifications in the ways in which men exploit women. Rather, male violence

8
against women is systematically condoned and legitimated by the states‟ refusal 9 to intervene
against it except in exceptional instances, though the practices of rape, wife beating,
sexual harassment etc. are too decentralized in their practice to be part of the state itself.
However, patriarchy does not operate in a vacuum. Our normative social practices are deeply
embedded in a disciplinary culture that condones or even encourages violence. Women‟s
rights, under the Islamic law are often not implemented. There are lots of evidences, the
rights which are grunted in the religious laws are often not enforced in a male dominated
patriarchal society. Thus, the patriarchal argument that women are subordinated by religion is
not completely true. Rather the proponents of patriarchy in the society use religion as a tool to
conserve their dominance over females.

Conclusion
From the above discussion it is clear that in our country women are victims of
subordination (e.g. under male domination), exploitation (e.g. unequal pay, low wages),
oppression (e.g.violence). The issues of son preference, discrimination against girls (e.g. food
distribution, burden of household work, lack of education, freedom and mobility), dowry,
violence against women (e.g. wife-battering, rape), unequal wage, discriminatory personal
laws, the use of religion to oppress women, the negative portrayalof women in the media,
all of these patriarchal practices exist.

Women in Bangladesh are apparently guaranteed gender equality by the

constitution of Bangladesh and the general law. But patriarchal interpretation of the law
continues the dominance of patriarchal attitudes. That is said the „legal situation of
Bangladeshi women is far better than the actual situation‟. Legally women are not to be
discriminated against in any sphere say in familial, social, political, economic and cultural
life and specific legal provisions are to be in place to deal with any in infringement of
the equal rights of women. Despite some recent reforms purporting to improve women‟s
status, there is no real change in the situation of patriarchal domination. It is also argued that
the dominant patriarchal structures, with the interlinked forces of religion, tradition and
seclusion, are sustained not only in women‟s family life but also in every sphere of life. The
main cause of women‟s subordination are the negative impact of tradition, religion,
patriarchy, seclusion or purdah and paternalistic attitudes in the socio-economic and legal
spheres. But among these factors patriarchy is the prime cause and other causes are the by-
product of patriarchy. As because the main problem of subordination is not really religion or
tradition, but patriarchal influence and authority, it is men who have interpreted religion,
molding it perpetuate the patriarchal domination which has strong links with the issue of
gender inequality.

Thus, to raise women‟s position, it is urgent to protect women from patriarchal

subordination. It is patriarchal ideology which makes us feminine and masculine, which
assigns different roles, rights and responsibilities to women and men. But those so- called
„masculine‟ and „feminine‟ qualities are human qualities and not specific to either men or
women. Since all works are done by both men and women, there is no reason to differentiate
works on the basis of sex. Men made this differentiation of work only for their privilege, for
their material benefit. Not every child in the family, just male child is allowed and
encouraged to grow and flourish. So the culture which has been developed on the basis of
gender should be changed. Family can play a great role by bringing a new dimension in
reconstructing the ongoing socialization. Moreover, if men become more like women i.e.

9
 10
look after children and old people, run homes etc. It will make man more gentle, sensitive
and human and will relieve women of some of the burden of work. And if bravery,
fearlessness, rationality, efficiency are considered „male‟ then women should definitely
imbibe and practice these traits. Our double standards of morality and our laws, which give
more rights to men should also be reformed. All that is needed is the recognition of justice
and the courage to put an end to this injustice, male discrimination and double standard.
Given the fact, that patriarchal oppression of women is rooted in the home/family sexuality,
and man-woman relationship, so this patriarchal oppression and exploitation of women within
families should be protected by “personal matter of families are addressed, analyzed to
change.

Time has come to bring a radical change in the dominant ideology of patriarchy. This
dominant ideology, which is produced from patriarchal structures is found in all areas of
social relations. It is said that it is not enough to change only family value system, the laws of
inheritance, property distribution, right over children should also be changed. To bring
equality, it is essential to establish equal right between men and women in all respects of life.
The responsibilities of women should also be equally distributed. In fact, I believe that real
democracies and egalitarian societies can only be established if we practices democracy,
equality and mutual respect within the family. Real peace in society can only be established if
we experience peace at home.

References

1. Beauvior, D. S. 1974. The Second Sex. Vintage Books: New York.

2. Beechey, V. 1977. Some notes on female wage labour in capitalistproduction.
Capital and Class. 3, autumn 45-66.
3. Bhasin, K. 2006. What Is Patriarchy. Women Unlimited: NewDelhi.
4. Brownmiller, S. 1976. Against Our Will : men women and rape.
Harmonds Worth: Penguin.

5. Cobuild, C. 2010. Advanced Illustrated Dictionary. Harper Collins

Publishers Ltd.: Great Britain.
6. Engels, F. 1940. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the
State. London : Lawrence and Wishart.
7. Firestone, S. 1974. The Dialectic of Sex : The case for feminist
revolution. New York: Morrow.
8. Freud, S. 1977. On Sexuality. Harmondsworth : Penguin
9. Hartmann, H. 1. 1981. The Unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: towards a
more progressive union Women and Revolution, (ed). Lydia Sargent, London: Pluto
Press., pp. 95-119.
10. ............, 1981a. The family as the locas of gender, Class and political struggle: the
example of house work, Signs, 6, 3, pp. 366- 394.
11. Hornby A. S. 2003. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary.
12. Oxford University Press: New York.

10
 11
13. Jagger, M. A. and Rosenberg S. P. (ed) 1984. Feminist Frameworks.
New York : MC Grew-Hill.
14. Lerner, G. 1989. The Creation of Patriarchy. Oxford University Press:
New York.
15. Lim, Y.C. Linda..1997. Capitalism, Imperialism and Patriarcy: The Dilemma of
Third-World Women Workers in Multinational Factorie in Visvanathan, Naline
(etal). The Women Gender and Development Reader. The University Press Limited:
Dhaka. 215- 230.
16. Mahtab N. 2007. Women in Bangladesh from Inequality to
Empowerment. A H Development Publishing House: Dhaka.
17. Mies M. (etal) 1988. Women: The Last Colony. Delhi : Kali for Women.
18. Millett, K. 1977. Sexual Politics. London: Virago.
19. Mitchell, J. 1971. Women’s Estate. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
20. Monsoor, T. 1999. From Patriarchy to Gender Equity : Family law and
its Impact on Women in Bangladesh. The University Press Limited:
Dhaka.
21. Oakley, A. 1972. Sex Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.
Rendall, V. 1982. Women in Politics. London.
22. Walby, S. 1990. Theorizing Patriarchy. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.:
Oxford, UK and Cambridge USA.

11