BC Aptis Score Report 2023
BC Aptis Score Report 2023
How to read
the score report
QR Code:
The validity of Aptis results can be confirmed by
scanning the QR code or by following the link at the
bottom of the certificate.
DEMO CUSTOMER 24.12.2023 Aptis~0000046 Test taker details and session information
Numerical Score:
Note that these scores should NOT be compared across
skills. This is because benchmarks between CEFR levels
vary according to skill.
26/50
Candidate A
Overall CEFR B2 Candidate A:
This candidate was awarded an overall CEFR level of B2.
Skill Name Skill Score
An overall CEFR level is only calculated for candidates
Listening 44/50
who take a four-skills package.
Reading 32/50
Speaking 47/50 This candidate achieved an overall scale score of 169.
Writing 46/50 This is the total numerical score from the four skills.
Final Scale Score 169
For each language skill, and overall (if all 4 skills are
Grammar and Vocabulary 30/50
taken), the candidate is awarded both a numerical scale
score and a CEFR level.
C Comparing scores:
B2 B2 B2 Numerical scores can be compared for the same skills
B1
component. For example, in Listening, these two
candidates have the same CEFR level, but the numerical
scores inform us that Candidate A had a slightly stronger
performance than Candidate B.
Candidate B
Overall CEFR C Candidate B:
This candidate received an overall CEFR level of C and an
Skill Name Skill Score
overall numerical score of 169.
Listening 40/50
Reading 42/50 Note that although Candidate A has the same overall
Speaking 47/50 numerical score, Candidate B receives a higher overall
Writing 40/50 CEFR level. This is possible because these two summary
Final Scale Score 169
results are calculated independently of one another.
The overall numerical score is a straightforward total of
Grammar and Vocabulary 35/50
the scores for each of the four skill areas (out of a
maximum possible 200), the overall CEFR calculation is
based on the four CEFR levels achieved.
CEFR Skill Profile
Speaking score comparison:
Both candidates received the same numerical score for
C C C the Speaking component (47), but Candidate A was
B2 B2 awarded a CEFR level B2 and Candidate B level C. This is
not a mistake. Both candidates scored in the “grey area”
just below a CEFR level threshold for Speaking. The
comparatively strong performance in the grammar and
vocabulary (core) component for Candidate B resulted
in their being awarded level C.
Listening Reading Speaking Writing Overall
CEFR grade