Report commissioned by:

Example Individual

Organisation:

Example Organisation

EXAMPLE TANKER

IMO Number: 123456789

INSPECTED AT YOKKAICHI JAPAN

01 st OCTOBER 2022
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

REPORT TERMS OF USE

This report is intended for the sole use of Example Individual and is designed to o er a condition evaluation of the subject
vessel, as found on the day of the survey and in the opinion of the surveyor concerned. The report is subject to any access
restrictions as described herein, and subject always to the level of cooperation a orded to the surveyor during the inspection
itself. All details are given in good faith, and without guarantee.

This report has been prepared and issued by Idwal Marine Services Ltd to its Customer, Example Indiviudal of Example
Organisation, in accordance with, and subject to, the General Terms and Conditions of Idwal Marine Services Ltd, a copy of
which can be obtained at www.idwalmarine.com/terms-conditions. Attention is particularly drawn to restrictions on reproduction
and disclosure of, and limits on reliance on, this Report as more fully set out therein.

To access all documents related to this report, and verify the authenticity of its contents,
please view the full version available here:

customer.idwalmarine.com/000-000

Pre-sale report reference: 000/000

Report commissioned for: Example Individual

Organisation: Example Organisation

PDF generated for: [email protected]

Time & date: 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 1
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

CONTENTS

INSPECTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SUMMARY
....................................................................................................................................................
3

COMPARE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . YOUR
. . . . . . . . . .IDWAL
. . . . . . . . . . .GRADE
5
...................................................................................................................................

KEY
. . . . . . .NOTABLE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ITEMS
..................................................................................................................................................
6

DECARBONISATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .SUMMARY
8
.........................................................................................................................................

GRADING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATA
.........................................................................................................................................................
9

DESIGN
. . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . CONSTRUCTION
10
..............................................................................................................................................

HULL
..................................................................................................................................................................
11

MOORING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DECKS
13
.................................................................................................................................................

WEATHER
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DECKS
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . .FITTINGS
15
................................................................................................................................

BALLAST
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . TANKS
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . SYSTEMS
17
..................................................................................................................................

ACCOMMODATION
..................................................................................................................................................................
18

BRIDGE
. . . . . . . . . . . . AND
. . . . . . . .NAVIGATION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EQUIPMENT
20
..........................................................................................................................

ENGINE
. . . . . . . . . . . . .ROOM
. . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . MACHINERY
...................................................................................................................................
21

FIRE
. . . . . . . .FIGHTING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .EQUIPMENT
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . SYSTEMS
23
................................................................................................................

LIFESAVING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .APPLIANCES
...............................................................................................................................................
24

SAFE
. . . . . . . . WORKING
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENVIRONMENT
26
..........................................................................................................................................

POLLUTION
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CONTROL
27
...............................................................................................................................................

ONBOARD
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .MANAGEMENT
29
.................................................................................................................................................

VESSEL
. . . . . . . . . . . .CAPABILITIES
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .AND
. . . . . . . CARGO
. . . . . . . . . . . .SYSTEMS
30
..............................................................................................................

ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS

Vessel documents

Vessel photos

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 2
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

INSPECTION SUMMARY
73 GRADE

VESSEL PA R TI C ULA R S

Ship Name Example Vessel

Previous Name Example Vessel 1

IMO Number 123456789

Port of Registry Example Port

Ship Type Products Tanker

Flag Example Flag

Classification Society Example Class

Registered Owner Example Owner

Technical Manager Example Manager

Shipbuilder Example
Shipbuilder

Delivery Date 01/01/2008

Yokkaichi, 20 Oct 2022 Status: 7.5 Hours Limited
Japan Discharging Aboard documents Dead Weight Example MT
provided
Gross Tonnage Example MT

Net Tonnage Example MT

The Example Vessel is an example DWT, example Gross Tonnage, Length Overall Example m
Example flagged, Products Tanker vessel built to a good standard by Breadth Example m
Example Shipyard, in Example Country under Example Class supervision
Depth Example m
and was delivered on the 01st January 2008. The vessel is now Classed
with Example Class. Summer Draught Example m

Lightweight Example MT
A Condition Inspection of the vessel was conducted on the 20th October
2022 in Yokkaichi by Idwal under instruction from Example Organisation.

Fair cooperation was provided by the ship’s crew with no access granted
to the cargo or ballast tanks. The vessel was alongside, discharging at
the time of inspection.

The vessel was found to be in good overall condition with an Idwal

Grade below the average for vessels of a similar age, type and size with a
few notable items found during the inspection. These are reported
specifically in the notable items section of this report.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 3
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

The onboard management was found to be good with the Safety

Management system found to be well implemented and the vessel generally
found to provide a safe working environment. The Port State Control (PSC)
history was found to be good with 9 deficiencies and 0 detentions in the 7
inspections conducted in the past three years.
The vessel's Attained EEXI was calculated to be between 4.03 and 4.27, which
is potentially above the required EEXI of 4.07, and therefore the vessel may
require the installation of technologies to reduce the EEXI score.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 4
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

COMPARE YOUR IDWAL GRADE

This section of the report allows you to compare your ship's grade with similar ships.

Your Idwal Grade vs other LR1 Tanker vessels This graph shows the distribution of
Idwal Grades against your ship's
Vessel Grade: 73 sector.

15
Percentage of Total Ships

10

Average Grade: 78
0
72 74 76 78 80 82 84

Idwal Grade

Your Idwal Grade vs other LR1 Tanker vessels, age 10-15 years This graph shows your ship’s Idwal
Grade compared against other ships
86
inspected in the same sector, within a
84 similar age range, and how it
compares against the average Idwal
82 Grade for the sector.
80
Idwal Grade

78

76

74

72

70
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

Ship Age

The ship’s grade may appear different when compared with the average of the two graphs. This is as a result of the second graph
comparing a smaller and more focused sample of ships.

For a more in-depth analysis of where your vessel compares amongst its peers, please contact your Idwal sales rep.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 5
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

KEY NOTABLE ITEMS

Estimated
Description Action / Timeline
Cost [USD]

The vessel is not equipped with a Ballast Under IMO regulations this will not $500000
Water Treatment System (BWTS) be required until IOPP renewal
survey due by the 13th Nov 2023.

An Environmentally Acceptable Lubricant For information. $20000 - $50000

(EAL) is not in use in the C.P.P and
therefore the vessel is not VGP compliant
in regard to oil-to-water interface control
requirements. it was reported that the the
sealing components will need to be
changed for EAL complaint oil during the
next dry-docking.

The incinerator was noted to have been For information. $0

de-commisioned as per the relevant Class
note.

Not all provision stores were at the Investigate reasons for incorrect <$1000
required temperatures with both the meat tempertaures and rectify when
and fish room were seen to be higher than possible.
required.

Main Engine performance reports were Ensure all future engine performance <$1000
seen to have causes for concern with it tests are conducted at a minimum
noted that it had been conducted at a low load of 70% as per good marine
load, 43.5%. practice.

Areas of coating breakdown were noted Remedial cosmetic maintenance to <$1000

around the mooring deck plating due to be carried out as soon as practical.
abrasions from mooring wires.

Scattered areas of spot corrosion were Ensure the required cosmetic <$1000
noted around the main deck girders, maintenance to completed as soon
though signs of on-going cosmetic as practical.
maintenance were noted.

The gratings for the helicopter winch area Remedial cosmetic maintenance to <$1000
were seen to be heavily corroded. be carried out as soon as practical.

Areas of heavy wear were noted to the To be renewed as soon as practical. <$1000
flooring in the laundry room.

The auxiliary boiler O2 measurement To be further investigated and $1000 - $5000

panel was noted to be faulty. rectified as soon as practical.

The Perspex for the lifeboat window was To be further investigated and <$1000
seen to be heavily obscured. rectified as soon as practical.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 6
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

The magnetic compass fitted to the rescue To be further investigated and <$1000
boat was seen to be unreadable. rectified as soon as practical.

Two electrical connection boxes inside the To be further investigated and <$1000
forecastle store were seen to have rectified as soon as practical.
damaged covers.

Coating breakdown and corrosion on the A more thorough blasting of the hull $20000 - $50000
hull was seen to be moderate with may be required at the vessels next
scattered corrosion and breakdown note docking.
to the anti-foulings along the length of the
hull.

The vessel computers are connected to a To be investigated and rectified. $1000 - $5000
centralized server with credentials access
to the system from each PC, with crew
reporting that regular issues occurred with
the system.

The Annual VDR performance test was To be further investigated and $1000 - $5000
noted to be overdue by 49 days. conducted as soon as practical.

Minor structural issues were found on the To be further investigated and any $1000 - $5000
hull with one minor indent noted on the required repairs conducted as soon
starboard side in way of frame 40, aft of as practical.
ballast tank 6.

As per crew reports the cargo tank heating To be further investigated and $1000 - $5000
coils were not operational as pressure test rectified as soon as practical.
had been conducted since the vessel was
taken over from previous management in
December 2021.

The vessel is reportedly fitted with free to Positive. <$1000

access limited use Wi-Fi system.

The vessel is fitted with an airseal on the Positive. $0

stern tube and is therefore Vessel General
Permit (VGP) compliant in this regard.

Please note, all costs are estimations only, based on industry averages, and may vary depending on locations and scopes of
work. These costs are provided to assist the reader to consider the potential Capex or Opex impact of the related Notable Item
and should not be used for budgeting purposes without further internal assessment of their accuracy.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 7
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

DECARBONISATION SUMMARY

The vessel was delivered to the market before the EEDI requirements, and therefore has no EEDI score assigned. Based
on information provided by the vessel during the inspection, the Attained EEXI score was calculated to be between 4.03
and 4.27. This Attained EEXI score is potentially above the required EEXI of 4.07, and therefore the vessel may require
the installation of technologies to reduce the EEXI score. For more information about technologies to reduce a vessel's
EEXI, the creation of the EEXI technical file or operational measures to reduce a vessel's Attained CII, please contact your
Idwal sales representative.

EEXI

Required EEXI Attained EEDI/EEXI

4.07 4.03 - 4.27

gCO 2/t.nm gCO 2/t.nm

Vessel is close to the EEDI/EEXI requirement and may require additional retrofitting of technologies

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 8
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

73
GRADING DATA
GRADE

The Idwal Grade® is an industry recognised measure of asset integrity. Using proprietary algorithms, the Idwal Grade is
programmatically calculated from over 500 individual data points, captured during a rigorous and standardised inspection
process. Our data-driven methodology ensures that our reports are consistent, accurate and free from bias.

SUB GRADES

The methodology used to calculate the Idwal Grade® is also applied to the grading of the different vessel areas and categories.
Two key areas are the overall vessel condition and vessel management:

Condition 71 Management 78

The following are grades representing individual areas of interest of the vessel:

Design and Construction 80 Hull 60

Mooring Decks 70 Weather Decks and Fittings 70

Ballast Tanks and Systems 60 Accommodation 70

Bridge and Navigation Equipment 70 Engine Room and Machinery 80

Fire Fighting Equipment and Systems 80 Lifesaving Appliances 70

Safe Working Environment 80 Pollution Control 90

Onboard Management 80 Vessel Capabilities and Cargo Systems 60

Forthcoming Regulatory Compliance 70 Crew Welfare 80

Crew Performance 80 Safety Management 80

Planned Maintenance System (PMS) 80 Classification and Certification 80

PSC Performance 80

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 9
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

80
The construction and design was found to be Program (ESP) but does not hold a Class notation for in
good overall, with the vessel built to IACS Water Surveys. No UTM report was made available for
standards and Rules by Example Shipyard with review. Apart from the equipment required by international
the keel laid in February 2008. The vessel is a Products rules and regulations, the bridge is also fitted with
Tanker, with 14 tanks, driven by a controllable pitch differential-GPS and internal and external CCTV system and
propeller. The Main Engine is a NOx Tier 1, MAN B&W and the engine room and machinery are fitted with UMS
the vessel has 4 Auxiliary Engines, and no shaft generator. capabilities.
It is subject to the Enhanced Survey

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 10
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

HULL

60
The hull was seen to be in a fair overall condition, spot corrosion, up to approximately 20% of the surface area,
with the hull able to be inspected from all round mainly located to anti-foulings along the length of the hull.
while alongside. The vessel was found to be free Hull markings were partly obscured with no marine fouling
of major structural defects, however, one minor indent was observed. The vessel's last out of water bottom survey was
noted on the starboard side in way of frame 40, aft of carried out on 27-Jun-18, with the vessel’s next out of water
ballast tank 6. The hull was seen to have moderate scattered bottom survey due by 13-Nov-23.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Coating breakdown and corrosion on the hull was seen to be moderate with scattered corrosion
and breakdown note to the anti-foulings along the length of the hull. $20000 -
Corrective Action: A more thorough blasting of the hull may be required at the vessels next docking. $50000

Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 11
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Issue: Minor structural issues were found on the hull with one minor indent noted on the starboard
side in way of frame 40, aft of ballast tank 6. $1000 -
Corrective Action: To be further investigated and any required repairs conducted as soon as practical. $5000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 12
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

MOORING DECKS

70
The Mooring decks were seen to be in a fair to good condition with the gearing seen to be adequately
good condition overall, primarily due to the level greased as required. Anchor chains and mooring ropes were
of coating breakdown noted on the decks. The in a good overall condition. Mooring practices were seen to
decks were found to be free of structural defects and had be good and snap-back zone warnings were seen to be
only minor scattered spot corrosion, up to approximately posted at the entrances to mooring areas as per industry
5% of the mooring deck plating total surface area, mainly best practice. The Bosun's store was in a fair overall
located to deck plating and around foundations of fittings. condition with it noted that the housekeeping could be
Areas of breakdown also noted around the deck plating due improved upon. It was also noted that two electrical
to abrasions from mooring wires. Deck fittings were found connection boxes inside the forecastle store were seen to
to be in a good condition with fairleads and mooring rollers have damaged covers. The bitter end release arrangements
free to turn when tested. All Hydraulic windlasses and were seen to be clear and unobstructed and the emergency
winches were reported to be fully operational and free from towing booklet seen to be available near to the Foc'sle.
hydraulic leakage as observed. Mooring machinery was in

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Areas of coating breakdown were noted around the mooring deck plating due to abrasions from
mooring wires.
<$1000
Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 13
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Two electrical connection boxes inside the forecastle store were seen to have damaged covers.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 14
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

WEATHER DECKS AND FITTINGS

70
The Weather Decks and Fittings were seen to be in were found to be in a fair condition with the gratings for the
fair to good condition overall, primarily due to the helicopter winch area were seen to be heavily corroded
levels of corrosion noted around the deck girders. however, pipework and fittings were seen to be generally
The decks were found to be free of structural defects and free of leakages and deck mooring machinery was in good
had only minor scattered spot corrosion, up to condition. The accommodation ladders and gangways were
approximately 5% of the main deck plating total surface in a good overall condition, with no notable defects found,
area, mainly located to edges of deck girders, though signs as were provisions lifting appliances.
of on-going cosmetic maintenance were noted. Deck fittings

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Scattered areas of spot corrosion were noted around the main deck girders, though signs of on-
going cosmetic maintenance were noted.
<$1000
Corrective Action: Ensure the required cosmetic maintenance to completed as soon as practical.

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 15
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Issue: The gratings for the helicopter winch area were seen to be heavily corroded.

Corrective Action: Remedial cosmetic maintenance to be carried out as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 16
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

BALLAST TANKS AND SYSTEMS

60
Ballast tanks and systems were deemed to be in a surface area, mainly located to bulkheads and support
fair overall condition. No tanks could be entered edges. Ballast tank fittings such as ladders and pipework
due to terminal restrictions and no photographs were reported to be in a fair overall condition with areas of
of previous tank entries were provided for review, though corrosion reported to fittings. Tanks were reported to have a
recent inspection reports were made available. In the minimal amount of mud/sediment accumulation but were
absence of photographic support the condition of the tanks reportedly free of any signs of staining from sewage or
is based on vessels of a similar age, type, and size. The marine fouling. Ballast control systems such as valves and
ballast tanks were reported to be generally free of significant gauges were reported to be fully operational and all ballast
structural defects and had only minor scattered spot pumps were in good working order and in good visual
corrosion, up to approximately 15% of the ballast tanks total condition.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 17
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

ACCOMMODATION

70
The accommodation areas were seen to be in a temperature and was seen to be in good condition with no
fair to good condition overall, primarily due to the defects. The galley equipment was deemed to be in a good
high temperatures of the meat and fish cold overall condition with all equipment reportedly in good
rooms. Floor and wall coverings were found to be in fair working order. The galley was found to be in a very clean
condition with areas of heavy wear noted to the flooring in condition with the galley hoods also found to be kept clean.
the laundry room and upholstery and furniture found to be The vessel's walk-in cold rooms were found to be clean and
free from deterioration and defects. The levels of hygienic however, temperatures were not at the required
housekeeping and cleanliness was found to be good with levels with both the meat and fish room were seen to be
levels of hygiene also seen to be good in the sanitary higher than required, with the crew reporting that both were
facilities. The hospital was seen to be well equipped and being defrosted. Provision room components were seen to
ready for use with drugs and controlled substances locked be generally free of frosting and deterioration. The external
away. The associated drugs log was kept up to date. The superstructure was found to be free of structural defects
accommodation was found to be outfitted to an average and had only minor scattered and spot corrosion, up to
quality. The Crew Welfare was found to be in good overall approximately 2% of the surface area, mainly located
with it noted that the vessel is fitted with a free to access yet around porthole edges. The external superstructure fittings
limited use Wi-Fi system and crew were reported to have were seen to be in a good overall condition with all external
access to a well-stocked bond store. The Air Handling Unit accommodation doors in good working order and properly
(AHU) was found to be maintaining a comfortable closing.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Not all provision stores were at the required temperatures with both the meat and fish room
were seen to be higher than required.
<$1000
Corrective Action: Investigate reasons for incorrect tempertaures and rectify when possible.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 18
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: Areas of heavy wear were noted to the flooring in the laundry room.

Corrective Action: To be renewed as soon as practical. <$1000

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The vessel is reportedly fitted with free to access limited use Wi-Fi system.

Corrective Action: Positive. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 19
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

BRIDGE AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

70
The Bridge and navigation equipment were found The compass deviation log was found to be satisfactory,
to be in a fair to good condition overall, primarily with no major deviations and generally up-to-date. The
due to the overdue VDR annual performance test. vessel is licensed to cover GMDSS sea areas A1, A2, and A3
Housekeeping was found to be good throughout with all and had a valid shore-servicing agreement in place. The
bridge equipment reported to be fully operational. The radio batteries were seen to be well maintained and in good
vessel's VDR was found to be free from any unanticipated condition and the EPIRB, SART and VHF handheld batteries
alarms with collection instructions posted nearby and with were all in date as required. Berth to berth passage plans
the Bridge Navigation Watch Alarm System (BNWAS) were seen on-board and were signed by all navigating
reported to be fully operational. It was however noted that officers with nautical publications provided in Paper and
the Annual VDR performance test was overdue by 49 days. Electronic format. Master's standing and night orders were
The vessel's primary means of navigation, as listed on form E found to be signed by all navigating officers with the bridge
of the safety equipment certificate is a dual ECDIS system log book correctly filled in and the GMDSS logbook also up
which were found to be up to date. RADAR blind sectors to date and correctly filled in. The Monkey island was found
were seen to be posted near the RADARs with the compass to be in a good overall condition with the mast, aerials and
deviation card up-to-date and available near to the helm. antennas seen to be satisfactory and free of defects.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The Annual VDR performance test was noted to be overdue by 49 days.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and conducted as soon as practical. $1000 - $5000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 20
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

ENGINE ROOM AND MACHINERY

80
The Engine room and machinery were found to be overhaul intervals are provided and Cylinder heads and
in a good overall condition, with no significant Pistons overhauls were within the service hours. Propulsion
defects reported or observed and with the engine systems, such as shafts, gearing and bearings were in good
room generally found to be clean. During the inspection the working order with no defects reported or sighted. The 4
Auxiliary Engines, purifiers, pumps and air compressors were Auxiliary Engines were reported to be fully operational and
seen running. Bilges and tank tops were generally free of oil were seen to be in good condition, with no major visible
or water. Pipework was seen to be in good overall defects. A review of the latest Auxiliary engines performance
condition, free of leaks, temporary repairs and significant report provided showed no areas of concern. A review of
corrosion with pipework lagging seen to be all clean and the latest Auxiliary engine running hours showed no
intact. Housekeeping was seen to be to a good overall overdue maintenance, though it was noted that engine
standard with the vessel found to be equipped with number 1 was within 100 hours of the stated overhaul
adequate critical spares as recommended by the ship period. The vessel's steam boiler was found to be fully
manager Safety Management System (SMS) which were seen operational but in fair condition with the O2 measurement
to be neatly stowed and secured. A review of the latest lube panel noted to be faulty. The boiler safety valves were seen
oil analysis reports provided showed no areas of concern. to be satisfactory and free of tampering. All Auxiliary
The NOx Technical file was up to date and last updated on equipment was found to be fully operational and in good
10-Sept-22. The Main Engine was reported to be fully condition. The steering gear was seen in good working
operational and was seen to be in good condition, with no order, free of leakage with emergency steering instructions
major visible defects. A review of the latest Main Engine seen to be posted nearby. The machinery spaces are
performance report provided showed some areas of concern operated in Unmanned mode and the alarm and control
as follows: conducted at a low load, 43.5%. A review of the system was seen to be free of any serious alarms. Electrical
latest engine running hours showed that the Bearings and distribution systems including the main switchboard were in
Cylinder Liners overhaul schedules are subject to Condition good working order and switchboard insulation readings
Based Monitoring (CBM) and therefore no dedicated were adequate.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: Main Engine performance reports were seen to have causes for concern with it noted that it had
been conducted at a low load, 43.5%.

Corrective Action: Ensure all future engine performance tests are conducted at a minimum load of <$1000
70% as per good marine practice.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 21
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The auxiliary boiler O2 measurement panel was noted to be faulty.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. $1000 - $5000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 22
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS

80
Fire Fighting Equipment and Systems were found hydrants and valves were in good overall condition, free of
to be in a good condition overall and generally defects. Fire extinguishers were all in good condition and all
free of fire hazards with all firefighting equipment portable equipment were positioned in accordance with the
seen to be regularly serviced and inspected. The fire fire plan. Firefighting outfits and associated equipment were
detection and alarm system was found to be fully all in good condition with BA equipment found fully
operational and was free of signs of tampering and alarms. charged and ready for use. The emergency generator was
The vessel is fitted with Foam and Water Spray fixed not tested during the inspection, but was reported to be in
firefighting in the engine room, Deck Foam for the cargo good working order and in a good overall condition.
areas and Galley CO2 in the accommodation. Fixed Remote shutdown emergency devices such as quick closing
firefighting systems were all reported to be in good working valves, machinery stops and ventilation dampers were
condition with operating instructions clearly posted. The deemed to be in a good overall condition with no defective
main and emergency fire pumps were reportedly fully shut down equipment. The fire doors were found to be in
operational and both were found to be in a good condition, good condition, closing effectively and free from any
free of leakages. The fire main and ancillaries such as unauthorised 'hold-open' arrangements.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 23
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

LIFESAVING APPLIANCES

70
Lifesaving appliances were seen to be in a fair to which were found to be in good condition with Hydrostatic
good overall condition, primarily due to obscured Release Units (HRUs) in date and correctly rigged. Davits and
lifeboat window and the illegible rescue boat lowering arrangements were found to be in good condition
magnetic compass, though all equipment was reported to overall with evidence of regular maintenance, servicing and
be regularly serviced and inspected as required. The vessel is inspection sighted and evident. Ancillary lifesaving
fitted with 1 free-fall lifeboat, which was seen to be in good equipment such as lifejackets, immersion suits and EEBD's
overall condition externally though was in fair condition etc. were found to be in good condition and ready for
internally with the perspex for the window was seen to be immediate use with man overboard smoke and light signals
heavily obscured. The lifeboat engine(s) was not tested seen to be in date. Embarkation ladders were found to be in
during the inspection, but was reported to be in good a good, well maintained condition with the pyrotechnics
working order. The vessel's rescue boat was found to be in a and line throwing apparatus found to be stored
fair overall condition with the magnetic compass fitted seen appropriately and within their expiry dates.
to be unreadable. The vessel is equipped with 5 life rafts,

NOTABLE ITEMS
Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The Perspex for the lifeboat window was seen to be heavily obscured.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 24
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The magnetic compass fitted to the rescue boat was seen to be unreadable.

Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. <$1000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 25
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT

80
Safe working was deemed to be good overall with were seen to be up to date and satisfactory with enclosed
no unsafe practices observed during the space entry procedures followed and an effective Permit To
inspection and the vessel presenting a generally Work (PTW) system in place. Main and emergency exits were
safe working environment. Hazards were seen to be clearly clearly identified and unobstructed with all IMO signage
marked and external walkways adequately coated with non- seen to be satisfactory. Pilot ladders and boarding
slip paint and free of trip hazards. Adequate PPE was seen arrangements were seen to be in a good safe condition with
to be worn by crew at all times and portable gas detection clear pilot boarding instructions posted. Regular drills were
meters were provided and calibrated. Hazardous substances conducted on board with the last drill conducted on the 08-
were seen to be generally safely managed with appropriate Oct-22, which was a Fire drill.
Material Safety Data Sheets provided. Risk Assessments (RA)

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 26
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

POLLUTION CONTROL

90
Pollution control was deemed to be good to very the stern tube and is therefore Vessel General Permit (VGP)
good overall and generally found to be well compliant in this regard. However, an Environmentally
implemented on board with the vessel free of Acceptable Lubricant (EAL) is not in use in the C.P.P and
pollution hazards. The vessel holds a Class-approved therefore the vessel is not VGP compliant in regard to oil-to-
Inventory of Hazardous Materials, which is required for water interface control requirements. it was reported that
entry into EU ports. The vessel's Oily Water Separator (OWS) the the sealing components will need to be changed for EAL
was found to be fully operational and in good overall complaint oil during the next dry-docking. The vessel's
condition, with no obvious defects. The OWS was not tested sewage treatment plant was found to be fully operational
during the inspection though the 15ppm Oil Content Meter and in good overall condition, with no obvious defects.
(OCM) was seen to be calibrated. The bilge overboard was Garbage segregation was found to be good, with adequate,
seen to be sealed and locked against unauthorised opening labelled containers and garbage seen to be well sorted and
and the oily water treatment system as a whole was seen to containers seen to be made of approved non-combustible
be free from signs of tampering or unauthorised materials. The Garbage Record Book (GRB) was seen to be
modification. The SOPEP locker was found to be well well-maintained and up-to-date, with the last entry on the
stocked with SOPEP equipment in good condition and an 17-Oct-22. The Emission Control Area (ECA) change-over
accurate list of equipment posted nearby. The Oil Record logbook was reviewed and found to be satisfactory with the
Book (ORB) was seen to be well-maintained and up-to-date, date of last entry on 02-Jul-22. The vessel's incinerator was
with the last entry on the 19-Oct-22. The vessel is not fitted not fully operational with it noted to have been de-
with a Ballast Water Treatment System (BWTS), which will be commisioned as per the relevant Class note, but was seen to
required before the next International Oil Pollution be in good overall condition, with no obvious defects. The
Prevention (IOPP) certificate expiry date on the 13-Nov-23. vessel complies with IMO 2020 regulations by employing the
The vessel's ballast record book was seen to be up to date use of Very Low Sulphur Fuels Oils (VLSFO) with a sulphur
and correctly filled in. The vessel is fitted with an airseal on content of less than 0.5%.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: The vessel is not equipped with a Ballast Water Treatment System (BWTS)

Corrective Action: Under IMO regulations this will not be required until IOPP renewal survey due by $500000
the 13th Nov 2023.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 27
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: An Environmentally Acceptable Lubricant (EAL) is not in use in the C.P.P and therefore the vessel
is not VGP compliant in regard to oil-to-water interface control requirements. it was reported that the
the sealing components will need to be changed for EAL complaint oil during the next dry-docking. $20000 -
$50000
Corrective Action: For information.

Description Estimated
Cost [USD]
Issue: The incinerator was noted to have been de-commisioned as per the relevant Class note.

Corrective Action: For information. $0

Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: The vessel is fitted with an airseal on the stern tube and is therefore Vessel General Permit (VGP)
compliant in this regard.
$0
Corrective Action: Positive.

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 28
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

ONBOARD MANAGEMENT

80
Onboard management was found to be good SMS for ordering of spares and general vessel management.
overall. The computer-based Safety Management The vessel computers are connected to a centralized server
System (SMS) was deemed to be functioning and with credentials access to the system from each PC, with
well implemented in general, with Permits to Work (PTW), crew reporting that regular issues occurred with the system.
risk assessments and procedures understood and followed. The Port State Control (PSC) history was found to be good
Onboard management was found to deal with accidents, with 9 deficiencies and 0 detentions in the 7 inspections
near misses and deficiencies in an effective manner and conducted in the past three years. The vessel's flag is not
regular safety committee meetings were carried out on targeted by any Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) or
board. The vessel's MLC certificate was valid with records of the USCG. Security access controls were deemed to be
hours of rest (ILO) correct and up to date and maximum satisfactory with the vessel conforming to International Ship
work hours not regularly exceeded. The PMS system was and Port Security (ISPS) standards. The Master and crew
found to be kept up to date with no critical overdue work were prepared for the inspection though only fair
orders. The Class-approved system-based Planned cooperation was provided with limited documents available.
Maintenance System (PMS) was fully integrated with the

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: The vessel computers are connected to a centralized server with credentials access to the system
from each PC, with crew reporting that regular issues occurred with the system. $1000 -
Corrective Action: To be investigated and rectified. $5000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 29
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref: Issued On:
Example 000/000 October 01
Vessel 2022

VESSEL CAPABILITIES AND CARGO SYSTEMS

60
Vessel capabilities and cargo systems were operational and in good condition. The vessel has ejectors
deemed to be in a fair overall condition. No tanks for cargo stripping, which were in full working order and in
could be entered due to operational limitations good condition as observed. The tank cleaning system was
and no photographs of previous tank entries were provided reportedly in full working order. The hose handling crane
for review, though previous crew inspection reports were was in full working order and in good condition as
made available. In the absence of photographic support the observed. The Cargo Control Room (CCR) was seen in a good
condition of the tanks is based on vessels of a similar age, condition with all Emergency Shutdown Devices and
type, and size. The vessel is equipped with 14 cargo tanks, monitoring systems in full working order. The Inert Gas (IG)
and can carry up to 7 segregations of cargo. Cargo tank system was in full working order and in good condition as
structural members were reported to be free of damage as observed. Pressure-Vacuum valves were in a good condition
were tank fixtures, such as ladders and pipework etc. Cargo with operating pressures clearly marked. The vessel is fitted
tanks were reported to be free of coating breakdown and with a mast riser, which was seen to be in a good overall
corrosion. Heating coils are fitted in the slop tanks but were condition. The vessel is fitted with a Vapour Emission
not fully operational with the crew reporting that no Control System (VECS), which was seen to be in a good
pressure test has been conducted since the vessel was taken overall condition. Hoses were seen to be in a good
over from previous management in December 2021. Cargo condition, pressure tested and certified. Gas monitoring
Heaters are fitted for each main cargo tank on the main deck instruments were provided on board and were adequately
and as per crew reports the system is not in use and has not calibrated as required. A Class-approved loading computer is
been recently been tested for integrity. Hydraulically driven installed on board. No information was provided on the
deep well cargo pumps are fitted, which were fully results of the last SIRE inspection.

NOTABLE ITEMS
Estimated
Description Cost
[USD]
Issue: As per crew reports the cargo tank heating coils were not operational as pressure test had been
conducted since the vessel was taken over from previous management in December 2021. $1000 -
Corrective Action: To be further investigated and rectified as soon as practical. $5000

Report commissioned by and for the sole use of Example Individual of Example Organisation. PDF generated
for [email protected] at 00:00 (UTC) on 01st October 2022 Page: 30
REPORT SECURITY I.D. 4e03f836-7742-d7c4-5fc2-c4cd9b0b5567
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

OPERATIONAL DATA

Operational Data Condition

Does the vessel have an Exhaust Gas Cleaning System No
(EGCS)?

Total High Sulphur Fuel Oil (HSFO) capacity: m3

Total Very and Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO and
2,362.9 m3
ULSFO) capacity:

Total Marine Gas Oil (MGO) and Diesel Oil (DO) capacity: 158.8 m3

Total Fresh Water capacity: 670.3 m3

Total Ballast Capacity Excluding Cargo Hold Ballast

31,818 m3
Capacity:

Total Bilge water capacity: 42.8 m3

Total sludge and residues capacity: 71.5 m3

What fuel type does the vessel run on for the majority
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
of the time?

Does the vessel have any energy efficiency No

technologies installed?

Page: 1
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Engines Table

Main Main
Aux Engine Aux Engine Aux Engine Aux Engine
Engine Engine
1 2 3 4
1 2

MAN MAN MAN MAN MAN

Designer N/A
B&W B&W B&W B&W B&W

Model MC-C 8L23/30H 8L23/30H 8L23/30H 8L23/30H

Number of Cylinders 6 8 8 8 8

Speed (RPM) 105 720 720 720 720

Bore (mm) 600 225 225 225 225

Stroke (mm) 2,400 300 300 300 300

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) (g/kWhr)

At 75% load for ME and 50% load for AEs,
171 208.25 208.25 208.25 208.25
corrected to ISO conditions, as stated on Nox
technical files

Nox Tier 1 1 1 1 1

Fuel Oil Consumption at full load (tonnes/day) 55.9 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Cylinder Oil Consumption (litres/day) 125 0 0 0 0

System Oil Consumption (litres/day) 40.0 20 20 20 20

Major Overhaul Interval (Hours) 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000

Running Hours since last overhaul (Hours) 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000

Page: 2
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Vessel Speed (knots) Consumption (t/day)

Loaded Eco 13.5 32.7

Loaded Service 16.5 63.9

Ballast Eco 13.0 32.3

Ballast Service 16.5 58.6

Main Engine Maintenance

Component Condition Based Monitoring? Overhaul Interval

Cylinder Heads 16,000

Pistons 16,000

Bearings Yes

Cylinder Liners Yes

Page: 3
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Main Engine No.1 Unit Running Hours

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Cylinder Heads 14,990 13,575 14,100 790 14,252 1,732

Pistons 14,990 13,575 14,100 790 14,252 1,732

Bearings 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744

Cylinder Liners 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744 74,744

Class Surveys
Were all Class and Statutory certificates valid? Yes

Is the vessel on the Extended Dry Docking (EDD) No

program?

Is the vessel on the Enhanced Survey Program (ESP)? Yes

Does the vessel have an In Water Survey Class No

notation?

Is the vessel ice classed? Yes

Ice class: IA

Page: 4
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Survey Date Last Completed Date Next Due

Main / Special / Renewal 27-Jun-18 13-Nov-23

Intermediate 23-Aug-21

Annual 23-Aug-21 13-Nov-22

Bottom In Water 07-May-21

Bottom in dry dock 27-Jun-18 13-Nov-23

What was the location of the last out-of-water docking? Example docking location

Is the vessels last dry dock report provided and No

attached?

Provide details of works done in last dry dock not provided for review

Does the vessel intend to dry dock before the next No

scheduled bottom survey?

Has the vessel remained with the same flag since No

build?

Please provide details of previous flags Example Flag

Has the vessel remained with the same Class since No

build?

Please provide details of previous Class societies Example Class

Does the vessel have any Conditions of Class or No

Recommendations of Class?

Page: 5
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Does the vessel have any Class Memos, Observations Yes

or Additional Requirements?

27 Dec 2,021 Owners reported that the Incinerator was not

operational due to failure of Exhaust fan and requested for
temporarily decommission of the Incinerator. Relevant IAPP and
Please provide further details IOPP Supplements removing reference to incinerator were issued at
this time. Operation of incinerator to be verified to the satisfaction
of attending Bureau Surveyor, prior reinstatement of incinerator.
As well as several of an informative nature.

The cost for the next out of water bottom survey or dry
docking based on a far eastern shipyard and includes all
1,400,000
survey and normal maintenance costs is approximately
estimated at:

What was the status of the vessel at the time of

Discharging
inspection?

Page: 6
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Design and Construction Condition

Has the vessel been built to the standards and Rules Yes
of an IACS-member Class Society?

Under what IACS Class society supervision was the

Example Class
vessel built?

Did the vessel provide Ultrasonic Thickness

No, not available
Measurement (UTM) reports?

Hull & Structure

Bridge & Communication

What features were seen on the bridge? Differential-GPS

Fitted with 2 SAAB R4 Navigation DGPS system

Internal and External CCTV system

Fitted with Four External (Forecastle, Bridge Wing P& S,

Poop deck) and 6 in Engine room(Main engine, Aux
engine, Hydraulic room, IG Fan, Steering Room, Purifier
room) Monitoring Stations - Bridge / CCR / ECR

Engine Room & Firefighting

UMS Capabilities (regardless of Class notation)

Vessel records were verified

Page: 7
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

HULL

Hull Condition

What sections of the hull were inspected? All round (alongside)

Was the vessel free of any major structural damage or Yes

indentations?

Was the vessel free of any minor structural damage or No one minor indent noted on the starboard
indentations? side in way of frame 40, aft of ballast tank
6

What was the level of Hull coating breakdown and

Moderate
corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to anti-foulings along the length of the hull
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

20%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the condition of the hull markings? Partly obscured

What type of anti-fouling coating was applied? TBT-free antifouling paint

What level of marine fouling was seen? None

Were fenders installed on the hull? No

Page: 8
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What were the vessels draughts?

Fwd: (m) 6.3

Aft: (m) 7.9

Was the upper sections of the rudder visible? Yes

What condition was the rudder in? Good

Page: 9
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

MOORING DECKS

Mooring Decks Condition

Were the decks free of any structural damage or Yes
deformations?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed on the decks?

to deck plating ans around foundations of fittings. Areas

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in
of breakdown also noted around the deck plating due to
the following areas:
abrasions from mooring wires

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

5%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the general condition of the deck fittings? Good

Were fairleads and mooring rollers free to move when Yes

tested?

Were all mooring machinery reported to be fully Yes

operational?

What type of windlass(es) and winches were fitted? Hydraulic

Were the windlass(es) and winches seen to be free of Yes

hydraulic oil leaks?

Was the mooring machinery hydraulic pump unit Yes

(HPU) seen to be free from leaks?

What was the condition of the mooring machinery? Good

Page: 10
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What amount of band brake lining was seen to be

Moderate / Adequate
remaining?

Were clutching and gearing arrangements sufficiently Yes

greased?

What condition were the visible sections of the anchor

Good
chains seen to be in?

What type of mooring lines did the vessel have? Wire

What was the condition of the mooring ropes / wires? Good

Were safe mooring practices observed? i.e. no Yes

overlapping turns on split drum, chafing of lines or
unsafe leading.

Was the last brake test seen to be stencilled on the Yes

mooring winches?

Date of last test 30-Sept-22

What type of snap back warning signs/zones were

Signs at the entrance to the mooring decks
posted?

Was the Bosun's / Foc'sle store available for Yes

inspection?

What was the condition of the bosun's store structure? Structurally sound with no visible damage

What was the condition of the bosun's store coatings? Coatings fully intact with no corrosion

Was the condition of the bosun's store housekeeping? Fairly neat with some scattered equipment

Page: 11
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Were the bitter end release arrangements seen to be Yes

clear and unobstructed?

Was an 'emergency towing booklets/procedures' Yes

available near to the foc'sle?

Page: 12
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

WEATHER DECKS AND FITTINGS

Weather Decks and Fittings Condition

Were the decks free of any structural damage or Yes
deformations?

What was the level of coating breakdown and corrosion

Minor
observed on the decks?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in to edges of deck girders, though signs of on-going
the following areas: cosmetic maintenance were noted

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

5%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the general condition of the deck fittings e.g

Fair
handrails, brackets, vent heads, walkways, lighting etc.?

gratings for the helicopter winch area were seen to be heavily

Please provide further details
corroded

Does the vessel have mooring winches fitted on the Yes

main deck?

What was the condition of the mooring winches? Good

Were deck equipment and pipework free of leakages? Yes

What was the condition of the accommodation ladders

Good
or gangways?

Was the vessel fitted with a provision lifting Yes

appliance(s)?

What was the condition of the provision lifting

Good
appliance(s)?

Page: 13
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Does the vessel carry any major spares on external No

decks e.g. propeller blades, anchor etc.

Page: 14
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

BALLAST TANKS AND SYSTEMS

Ballast Tanks and Systems Condition

Were ballast tanks entered? No

Please provide further details terminal restrictions

Were recent (last 12 months) ballast tank inspection No

photographs provided?

Were inspection reports or reports of the tanks Yes

condition provided?

Were the tanks free of any structural damage or Yes

indentations?

What was the level of Ballast Tank coating breakdown

Minor
and corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

to bulkheads and support edges
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

15%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

Were ballast tanks coatings certified to PSPC No

standards?

What was the condition of ballast tank fittings (e.g.

Fair
ladders, handrails, pipes & manhole seals)?

Please provide further details areas of corrosion reported to fittings

Were the ballast tanks fitted with sacrificial anodes? No

Anode depletion: %

Page: 15
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

How much mud/sediment was seen inside the ballast

Minimal
tanks?

Please provide further details %

Were the tanks seen to be free from any signs of Yes

staining from oil, sewage or marine fouling?

Were ballast tank manhole covers seen to be in good Yes

condition?

Were the remote ballast control systems fully Yes

operational (e.g. valves, gauging etc)?

Were the ballast and/or anti-heeling pumps reported Yes

to be fully operational?

What condition were the ballast and/or anti-heeling

Good
pumps in?

Page: 16
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

ACCOMODATION

Internal Accomodation Condition

Were accommodation spaces used for their assigned Yes
purposes?

What was the condition of the flooring and wall

Fair
coverings?

Please provide further details areas of heavy wear noted to the flooring in the laundry room

What was the condition of the upholstery and

Good
furniture?

What were the general levels of housekeeping and

Good
cleanliness?

What was the level of hygiene of the sanitary facilities? Good

Was all laundry equipment in good working order? Yes

Was the Hospital well equipped and ready for use? Yes

Were the drugs controlled and substances seen to be Yes

locked away?

Was the associated drugs log kept up to date? Yes

What was the quality of accommodation outfitting? Average quality of outfitting

Did the Air Handling Unit (AHU) maintain a Yes

comfortable temperature?

What was the condition of the AHU? Good

Page: 17
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Galley Condition

What was the level of cleanliness in the Galley? Very Clean

Was all galley equipment operational? Yes

What was the general condition of galley equipment? Good

Were the insides of Galley hoods clean? Yes

What type of cold provisions stores does the vessel

Walk-in stores / Cold rooms
have?

Were provisions stores well organised with no Yes

provisions stored directly on the deck?

Were provisions stores clean and hygienic? Yes

Were provisions stores at the required temperatures? No both the meat and fish room were seen
to be higher than required, with the crew
reporting that both were being defrosted

Were provision stores temperatures recorded and Yes

records kept nearby?

Were provisions machinery, pipework and door seals Yes

free of frosting and deterioration?

Were lock-in alarms or handles in good working Yes

condition?

External Areas Condition

Was the external Superstructure / Accommodation Yes
Block found to be free from damages?

Were accommodation external doors found to be in Yes

good condition and providing an adequate seal?

Page: 18
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What was the level of external accommodation

Minor
superstructure coating breakdown and corrosion?

Coating breakdown and corrosion was mainly located in

around porthole edges
the following areas:

The amount of surface area coating breakdown and

2%
corrosion was approximately:

Type of coating breakdown and corrosion: Scattered Spot

What was the general condition of external

Good
superstructure fittings?

Crew Welfare

What is the average contract length for crew members?

Officers: 5 Months

Crew: 8 Months

Was Wi-Fi provided on-board? Yes, Free, Limited

Average (Able to access social media apps and

What is the approximate average internet speed?
websites with ease)

Is access provided to catering facilities or food at all Yes

times?

What Public Recreation equipment did the crew have Free Weights Fixed weight machine
access to?
Treadmill Cycling Machine

Table Tennis Television

En-suite facilities for all
crew members

What was the quality of crew recreation facilities? Good

Page: 19
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Are crew given time and resources to celebrate Yes

religious or cultural events (i.e. Christmas,
Independence days etc.)?

What facilities were provided in crew cabins? Sofa Desk

Ample storage

Does the vessel have any onboard training facilities? No

Please provide further details There is no dedicated training facilities provided

Is there a crew suggestion policy in place? Yes

Does the crew have access to a bonded store? Yes, well stocked

Are the crew given additional periods of rest

Yes
throughout the working week (e.g Sunday off)?

Page: 20
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

BRIDGE AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

General Condition
Was all the bridge equipment reported to be fully Yes
operational?

Was the bridge found to be clean and well maintained Yes

with good housekeeping?

Was the view from the bridge clear and unobstructed? Yes

Were all required bridge equipment annual No Annual VDR performance test noted to be
performance tests (e.g. VDR and AIS) completed in the overdue by 49 days
last 12 months?

Was the vessel fitted with a Voyage Data Recorder Yes

(VDR)?

Type of VDR fitted: VDR

Was the VDR seen to be free from any unanticipated Yes

alarms?

Were the VDR collection instructions posted and Yes

known to the Master?

Was the vessels Bridge Navigation and Watch Alarm Yes

System (BNWAS) fully operational, and turned on
when at sea?

Normal time setting at sea 12 mins

Navigation Condition

Primary Secondary

What was the vessels primary & secondary means of

ECDIS ECDIS
navigation as listed on Form E?

Page: 21
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Were the primary & secondary means of navigation Yes

found to be up to date?

Latest update week 41

Was the Echo Sounder fully operational? Yes

Were the RADARs fully operational? Yes

Were the "blind sectors" posted near to the RADARs? Yes

Does the vessel receive up to date weather Yes 20-Oct-22

information?

What type of weather updating service does the vessel

Digital subscription
use?

Was an in-date compass deviation card posted near Yes

to the helm?

Was a compass deviation log kept, up to date and free Yes

of any major deviations?

Were azimuth rings (bearing diopters) found to be Yes

available on the bridge?

Communication Condition
What GMDSS sea areas was the vessel licensed to A1 A2 A3 A4
cover?

Were the radio batteries seen to be in good Yes

condition?

Were the EPIRBs, SARTs and Emergency Hand Held Yes

VHF Batteries within their expiry dates?
Battery expiry dates

EPIRBS 01-Aug-24

SARTs 01-Aug-24

VHF 27-Feb-24

Page: 22
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Was a valid GMDSS shore servicing certificate seen to Yes

be posted near to radio equipment?

Documentation Condition

Were berth to berth passage plans seen on-board? Yes

Were passage plans signed by all navigating officers? Yes

What format were nautical publications provided in? Paper and Electronic

Were the Master's standing orders and night orders Yes

found to be signed by all navigating officers?

Was the bridge log book up to date and correctly filled Yes
in?

Was the GMDSS log book up-to-date and correctly Yes

filled in?

Date of last test 19-Oct-22

External Condition
Was the Monkey Island found to be in good, well Yes
maintained condition?

Were the main mast, aerials and antennas seen to be Yes

in good condition and free from damage?

Were bridge wing manoeuvring controls fitted? Yes

Were the bridge wing manoeuvring controls reported Yes

to be fully operational and free from signs of water
ingress?

Were bridge wing engine speed and compass Yes

repeaters seen to be in good working condition?

Page: 23
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

ENGINE ROOM AND MACHINERY

General Condition
What equipment was seen running? Auxiliary Engines Purifiers

Pumps Air compressors

Refrigeration
Auxiliary Boiler
Compressor

Was the engine room free of any significant defects, Yes

either reported by crew or observed?

What was the general cleanliness of the Engine Room? Clean

Were bilges and tank tops free of oil and water? Yes

Was housekeeping to a good overall standard? Yes

Was the vessel equipped with adequate critical spares Yes

as recommended by the ship manager Safety
Management System (SMS)?

Were spares neatly stowed and correctly secured? Yes

Were all sounding pipe self-closing devices in good Yes

working order and sounding pipes capped?

Were recent copies of lube oil analysis reports Yes

provided for review?

Were any caution (amber) or action (red) alerts seen No

on the lube oil analysis reports?

Was the NOx Technical file kept up to date? Yes

Date of entry: 10-Sept-22

Were Chief Engineer Standing Orders clearly posted Yes

and signed by all engineers?

Page: 24
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Were all machinery special tools provided and in good Yes

condition?

Main Engine Condition

Was the main engine in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the Main Engine appear to be in? Good

Were Main Engine performance reports provided for Yes

review?

Were the performance reports satisfactory? No conducted at a low load, 43.5%

Was there any overdue maintenance on the Main No

Engine Turbochargers?

Propulsion

What type of propulsion does the vessel have? Controllable Pitch Propeller (CPP)

Were the Propulsion systems, including shafts, Yes

machinery and electric motors, if relevant, in good
working condition?

What type of thruster systems does the vessel have? None

Power Generation

How many Auxiliary Engines does the vessel have? 4

Were the auxiliary engines in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the Auxiliary Engines appear to be

Good
in?

Page: 25
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Were Auxiliary Engines performance reports provided Yes

for review?

Were the performance reports satisfactory? Yes

Does the vessel have a shaft generator? No

Does the vessel have a shaft motor (Power Take-In)? No

Auxiliary Machinery
Does the vessel have an Auxiliary Boiler? Yes

What type of boiler is fitted? Steam

Was the boiler in good working condition? Yes

What condition did the Boiler appear to be in? Fair

Please provide further details the O2 measurement panel was noted to be faulty

Were boiler safety valves in satisfactory condition? Yes

Page: 26
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Equipment Fully operational? Condition

Purifiers Yes Good

Pumps Yes Good

Coolers Yes Good

Air Compressors Yes Good

Fresh Water Generator Yes Good

Filters Yes Good

Fans Yes Good

Refrigeration Systems Yes Good

Was all engine room pipework free of leakages? Yes

Was all pipework free of temporary repairs? Yes

Was all pipework free of corrosion or soft patches? Yes

What condition was pipework lagging in? Clean

Was the steering gear in good working condition? Yes

Was the steering gear free of leakages? Yes

Was the emergency steering communication Yes

equipment and gyro repeater working as required?

Were emergency steering instructions posted nearby? Yes

Was the Engine workshop clean and tidy? Yes

Page: 27
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

ECR and Electrical

Was the Engine Control Room clean and tidy? Yes

Was the Engine Control and Alarm system free of any Yes
serious alarms?

Does the vessel have an Unmanned Machinery Space Yes

(UMS) notation?

Does the machinery space operate in UMS mode? No

Were all Electrical distribution systems in good Yes

working condition?

Were Main Switchboard Insulation readings Yes

adequate?

Were distribution and switchboard panels protected Yes

with approved rubber matting?

Page: 28
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT AND

SYSTEMS

Fire and Safety Appliances Condition

Was the vessel free of fire hazards? Yes

Was all fire and safety equipment regularly serviced? Yes

Date of last service 15-Apr-22

Were all relevant Fire and Safety instructions correctly Yes

posted?

What was the vessels Fixed fire detection systems? Engine Room Cargo Holds Accomodation

Flame Flame Flame

Smoke Smoke Smoke

Heat Heat Heat

Smoke & Heat Smoke & Heat Smoke & Heat

(Combined) (Combined) (Combined)

Was the fire detection system reportedly fully Yes

operational?

Was the fire detection system free of alarms or signs Yes

of tampering?

Page: 29
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What is the vessels Fixed firefighting systems? Engine Room Cargo Holds Accomodation

CO2 CO2 Water Mist

Foam Deck Foam Galley CO2

Water Spray Water Spray Wet Chemical

None None None

Were all fixed fire fighting systems in good working Yes

condition?

Were clear operating instructions posted for the fixed Yes

firefighting systems?

Was the fixed firefighting system release protected Yes

against unauthorised operation?

Was the main fire pump working? Yes

Was the emergency fire pump working? Yes

Was a fire pump tested during the inspection? No

Were the main and emergency fire pumps in good Yes

condition and free of leakages?

What was the condition of the fire main and ancillaries

Good
such as pipework hydrants and valves?

Does the vessel have a fire control station? Yes

Were all portable equipment in place as per the fire Yes

plan?

Were all fire extinguishers in good condition? Yes

Were the firefighting outfits and associated Yes

equipment in good condition?

Were the International Shore Connections on board? Yes

Location: Fire station and Midship Store

Page: 30
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Was the BA equipment fully charged in good Yes

condition?

Was the Emergency Generator tested during the No

inspection?

Was the Emergency Generator in working order? Yes

Were Emergency Generator Starting instructions Yes

clearly posted?

What was the condition of the Emergency Generator? Good

Was the "18 hour" fuel level marked on the emergency Yes
generator fuel tank?

Was the Quick Closing Valve system in good working Yes

order?

Were fire doors in good condition and effectively Yes

closing?

Were fire doors free of unauthorised "hold-open" Yes

arrangements?

Were all ventilation dampers remote closing positions Yes

well labelled and in good working order?

Were all remote machinery shutdown systems well Yes

labelled and in good working order?

Page: 31
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

LIFESAVING APPLIANCES

Lifsaving Appliances Condition

Were all Lifesaving Appliances regularly serviced? Yes

Date of last service: 15-Apr-22

How many lifeboats is the vessel equipped with? 1

What type of lifeboat is the vessel fitted with? Free-fall

What was the external condition of the lifeboat(s)? Good

What was the internal condition of the lifeboat(s)? Fair

Please provide further details perspex for the window was seen to be heavily obscured

Were Lifeboat Engines able to be tested? No

Were lifeboat engines in good working order? Yes

What was the condition of the rescue boat? Fair

Please provide further details magnetic compass fitted was seen to be unreadable

How many life rafts does the vessel have? 5

Page: 32
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What was the condition of the life rafts? Good

Were Liferaft Hydrostatic Release Units (HRU) in date Yes

and correctly rigged?

What was the condition of the Davits and lowering

arrangements for the lifeboat(s), rescue boat and Good
liferafts?

What Date is the next Davit wire due for change? 28-Oct-22

Were legible launching/recovery instructions posted Yes

near to survival craft?

Was evidence of regular maintenance, service and Yes

inspection of the launching appliances sighted and
evident?

What was the date of the last abandon ship drill? 08-Oct-22

Were all lifejackets, immersion suits, EEBDs and other Yes

lifesaving ancillary equipment in good condition and
ready for use?

Were Man Overboard Buoy (MOB) smoke and light Yes

signals in date?

Were the embarkation ladders in a good, well Yes

maintained condition?

Were pyrotechnics and line throwing apparatus Yes

available, stored in an appropriate container and
within their expiry dates?

Page: 33
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

SAFE WORKING ENVIRONMENT

Safe Working Environment Condition

Were any unsafe practices observed during the No

inspection?

Did the vessel provide a safe working environment? Yes

Were all hazard markings clear? Yes

Were external walkways adequately coated with anti- Yes

slip paint and free of trip hazards?

Are all hazardous substances including safely Yes

managed and stored with relevant Material Safety
Data Sheets (MSDS)?

Is Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) provided and Yes

worn by crew?

Are 'Enclosed Space Entry' procedures implemented? Yes

Is an effective Permit To Work (PTW) process Yes

implemented?

Date of last PTW: 19-Oct-22

Is an effective Risk Assessment (RA) process in place? Yes

Was evidence of the annual and 5-yearly inspections Yes

of both fixed and portable lifting equipment and
appliances sighted?

Are main and emergency exits clearly identified and Yes

unobstructed?

Are sufficient portable oxygen and gas detection Yes

meters provided and regularly calibrated?

Date of last calibration: 09-Oct-22

Page: 34
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What is the working language of the vessel? English

Are standing orders, procedures, instructions and Yes

manufacturers' manuals written in a language which
can be understood by the crew?

Are all IMO signs correctly placed, and compliant with Yes
IMO requirements?

Does the vessel have an adverse history of accidents No

and near-misses?

Is the vessel equipped with an approved SOLAS Yes

training manual?

Were the pilot ladders and boarding arrangements in Yes

a good, safe condition?

Does the vessel have clear pilot boarding instructions Yes

posted?

Are regular drills conducted on board? Yes

Last drill date 08-Oct-22

Last drill type Fire

Page: 35
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

POLLUTION CONTROL

General Condition
Was Pollution Control well implemented within the on Yes
board Safety Management System (SMS)?

Is the vessel free of pollution hazards? Yes, with no hazards

Were scuppers plugged in port as required? Yes

Does the vessel have a Class approved Inventory of Yes The vessel holds a Class approved
Hazardous Materials (IHM)? Inventory of Hazardous Material (IHM)

Oil - Marpol Annex I

Is an Oily Water Separator (OWS) fitted? Yes

Was the OWS reportedly operational? Yes

What was the condition of the OWS? Good

Was the OWS Tested? No

Was the 15ppm meter calibrated? Yes

Date of calibration 15-Apr-22

Was the Bilge Overboard valve secured against Yes

unauthorised opening with adequate signage and
warnings posted?

Means of securing Sealed

Locked

Page: 36
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Was the oily water treatment system including valves Yes

and pipework free of any signs of tampering, bypass,
or modifications?

Was the SOPEP locker or box well stocked? Yes

What was the condition of the SOPEP equipment? Good

Was a list of SOPEP equipment posted and accurate? Yes

Was the Oil Record Book (ORB) up to date and Yes

correctly filled in?

Date of last entry 19-Oct-22

Category of last entry C

Were previous bunkering checklists correctly filled Yes

out?

Date of last bunkering 06-Oct-22

Were bunker samples correctly stored? Yes

Does the vessel have a Ballast Water Treatment No The vessel is not equipped with a Ballast
System (BWTS) fitted? Water Treatment System (BWTS)

Date of International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP) certificate

13-Nov-23
expiry

What regulation is listed on the Ballast Water

D-1
Management Certificate?

Was the Ballast Record Book up to date and correctly Yes

filled in?

Date of last entry 19-Oct-22

Is the Vessel General Permit (VGP) compliant? Yes Due to the use of an EAL or the airseal
arrangements in place for the stern tube,
the vessel is considered VGP compliant in
this regard for trade to the USA

Page: 37
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

How is the vessel VGP Compliant? *Environmentally Stern Tube Airseal

Acceptable Lubricant

Sewage - Marpol Annex IV

Was a Sewage Treatment Plant fitted? Yes

Was the Sewage Treatment Plant operational? Yes

What was the condition of the Sewage Treatment

Good
Plant?

Does the vessel have a sewage holding tank? No

Garbage - Marpol Annex V

Does the vessel have a garbage management plan? Yes

How was the condition of Garbage segregation? Good

Were Garbage containers of approved, non- Yes

combustible type?

Was the Garbage Record Book (GRB) up to date and Yes

correctly filled in?

Date of last entry 17-Oct-22

Category of last entry B

Air - Marpol Annex VI

Does the vessel have a valid IAPP certificate? Yes

Is the vessel compliant with IMO 2,020 Sulphur cap Yes

regulations?

How does the vessel comply with IMO 2,020 Use of Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oils (VLSFO), MGO, DO
regulations? etc.

Page: 38
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Does the vessel use Ozone Depleting Substances No

(ODS) as Refrigerant Gas?

Was an Incinerator fitted? Yes

Was the Incinerator operational? No noted to have been de-commisioned as

per the relevant Class note

What was the condition of the Incinerator? Good

Does the vessel have an Emission Control Area (ECA) Yes

change-over log?

Date of last entry 02-Jul-22

EEXI
Does the vessel have an EEDI score assigned at build? No

What fuel type does the vessel run on for the majority
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO)
of the time?

Does the vessel have any energy efficiency No

technologies installed?

Is the vessel ice classed? Yes

Ice class: IA

Main Engine(s)

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) (g/kWhr): 171

Auxiliary Engines

Specific Fuel Oil Consumption (SFOC) (g/kWhr): 208.25

Does the vessel have a shaft motor (Power Take-In)? No

Page: 39
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What is the expiry date of the International Air

13-Nov-23
Pollution Prevention (IAPP) certificate?

Page: 40
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

ONBOARD MANAGEMENT

Onboard Management Condition

Does the vessel have a functioning Safety Yes
Management System (SMS)?

How was the SMS Implemented? Software / Electronic System

Were the officers familiar with, and allowed easy Yes

access to, the SMS?

Was the SMS well implemented on board, with Yes

Permits to Work, Risk Assessments and Safety
procedures understood and followed?

Is the SMS system regularly reviewed by the Master? Yes

Date of last review 08-Oct-22

Does the vessel management deal with accidents, Yes

near-misses and deficiencies in an effective manner?

Are regular safety committee and management Yes

meetings carried out on board?

Does the vessel have a valid MLC certificate? Yes

Were Hours of Rest (ILO) records correct and up to Yes

date?

Last updated 19-Oct-22

Are hours of maximum permissible work regularly No

exceeded?

Is an effective Planned Maintenance System (PMS) Yes

implemented and kept up to date?

Page: 41
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What type of Planned Maintenance System (PMS) does

Class-approved system
the vessel have?

Name of PMS Example PMS

Was the PMS a fully integrated type system? (i.e. has Yes
integration with the SMS, spares ordering and is
accessible by shore side management)

Were there any critical overdue PMS work orders? No

Port State Control (PSC) inspection history

No. of Inspections in Past three years: 7

No. of Deficiencies in Past three years: 9

No. of Detentions in Past three years: 0

Is the vessel flag targeted by Port State Authorities? No

Is an effective system of security access control, Yes

conforming to ISPS standards, in place upon boarding
the vessel?

Restricted Areas, ISPS Locks & Seals, ID Check @

Type of access control
Gangway and Escort

Do the Master and Chief Engineer have an effective Yes

hand over procedures?

Are random or specific drug and alcohol testing Yes

carried out?

Tests Carried out by Onboard by Master External Company

Were the Master and crew prepared for the Yes

Inspection?

Page: 42
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What level of cooperation was provided by the crew and

Fair
Master?

Were documents provided as requested? Limited documents provided

What was the overall impression of the general

Well managed
management of the vessel?

Page: 43
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

VESSEL CAPABILITIES AND CARGO

SYSTEMS - TANKER

Cargo Tanks

How many Cargo Tanks does the vessel have? 14

How many cargo segregations can the vessel carry? 7

Cargo Tank Capacity (m³)

COT No.1 combined 11,186.1 m3

COT No.2 combined 14,449.9 m3

COT No.3 combined 14,482.7 m3

COT No.4 combined 14,482.7 m3

COT No.5 combined 14,482.7 m3

COT No.6 combined 14,291.1 m3

Page: 44
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Cargo Tank Capacity (m³)

COT No.7 combined m3

COT No.8 combined m3

COT No.9 combined m3

COT No.10 combined m3

Slop Tank No.1 1,009.9 m3

Slop Tank No.2 1,286.9 m3

Total Capacity 85,672 m3

Were the Cargo tanks able to be entered and No operational limitations

inspected?

Were recent vessel cargo tank inspection No

photographs provided?

Were inspection reports or other information relating Yes

to the cargo tanks' condition provided?

Were cargo tank structural members found to be free Yes

from damage (e.g. side plating, sumps and framing)?

Are the cargo tanks coated? Fully coated

Were the cargo tank fittings such as ladders, hand Yes No Cargo tanks were inspected due to
rails and pipe guards etc. found to be free from discharging in progress. Ships Crew did
damage? not provide any past Cargo tank
inspection photographs

What was the level of cargo tank coating breakdown

None
and corrosion?

Page: 45
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What was the last cargo carried? Example Cargo

What is the next intended cargo to be carried? TBA

Are heating coils fitted? Yes in the slop tanks only, with it noted that
independent Cargo Heaters are fitted for
each main cargo tank on main deck. As
per crew reports the system is not in use
and has not been recently been tested
for integrity

Were all heating coils reportedly operational? No the crew reported that no pressure test
has been conducted since the vessel was
taken over from previous management in
December 2,021

Is pipework passing through the tanks seen to be in Yes

good condition?

Does the vessel have any independent tanks, i.e. No

tanks located on the deck?

Pumping and Piping Systems

What type of main cargo pumps are fitted? Hydraulically driven deep well

What is the capacity of each of the deep well pumps? 1,000 m³/hr

What is the manufacturer of the deep well pumps? Example

Were deep well pump cofferdams regularly purged? Yes

Were all the pumps fully operational? Yes

What condition were the pumps in? Good

Was the pump room accessible? No

Page: 46
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

What cargo stripping arrangements is the vessel fitted

Ejectors
with?

Were stripping arrangements fully operational? Yes

What condition were the stripping arrangements in? Good

Is pumping system oil condition monitoring carried Yes Frequency (months): 6

out?

Were oil tests results satisfactory? Yes

What condition was the cargo pipework in? Good

Are deck cargo piping, manifolds and relevant deck Yes

equipment suitably marked?

Are reducers, removable U-bends and cargo hoses, if

Yes
carried, in good condition?

Is the Vessel Fitted with Tank Cleaning Equipment? Yes

Is the Tank Cleaning system in full working order? Yes

Is the vessel fitted with a hose handling crane(s)? Yes

Were the crane(s) seen in operation? No

Is the crane in full working order? Yes

What condition was the crane(s) in? Good

Monitoring and Safety Arrangements

Are tanker level monitoring systems in full working Yes
order?

Does the vessel have a dedicated Cargo Control Room Yes

(CCR)?

Page: 47
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

Is the CRR in good overall condition? Yes

Are all cargo Emergency Shutdown Devices (ESD) in Yes

full working order?

Is the vessel fitted with an Inert Gas (IG) system? Yes Combustion

Is the IG system in full working order? Yes

What condition was the IG system in? Good

What condition were the Pressure-Vacuum (PV)

Good
Breakers in?

Were the operating pressures clearly marked on the Yes

PV Breakers?

Is the vessel fitted with a Mast Riser? Yes

What condition was the Mast Riser in? Good

What condition was the Deck seal in? Good

Is the vessel fitted with a Vapour Emission Control Yes

System (VECS)?

Is the VECS in full working order? Yes

What condition was the VECS in? Good

Is the vapour manifold clearly marked? Yes

Are hoses pressure tested and certificated? Yes

What condition were the hoses in? Good

Are hoses regularly tested for continuity? Yes

Page: 48
 Vessel: Ref:
Example 000/000
Vessel

If appropriate, are fire wires in good condition and

Yes
properly rigged?

Is the vessel provided with suitable gas monitoring Yes

instruments?

Are the monitoring instruments calibrated and Yes

records available?

Does the vessel have a loading computer? Yes, Class approved

Vetting

Is the vessel older than 15 years? No

Page: 49
 CLASS RECORDS
REVIEW

Example Tanker

IMO Number: 123456789

01st October 2022

 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

SCOPE & PURPOSE

A Class records review was conducted at the request of Macquarie Specialised Capital Solutions for the purpose of
highlighting any notable facts, defects, or historical events relevant to the Products Tanker Sunny Liger.

Summary

The Example Vessel is an Example DWT Products Tanker with a gross tonnage of Example MT. The vessel was built under
Example Class supervision by Example Shipyard. She was delivered on the 01 January 2008. The vessel is Example flagged.

This review of the records shows that there are no Recommendations of Class and 1 Class observation. It was reported in
the observation that vessel’s incinerator is temporarily out of use. There have been no major incidents reported with this
vessel for groundings and no cases of being cancelled or suspended by Class.

The Vessel transferred Class from Example Class 1 to Example Class 2 in June 2018, and the records from the current Class
records were provided for review.

A review of the Class records showed a number of historic Recommendations of Class, which are stated as-issued in
Appendix V. In September 2019 the vessel CCP propeller was found to be leaking, divers applied steel putty to the leaking
O-ring as recommended by the manufacturers. In February 2022 fractures were found in COT 6P and S and the slop
tanks, these have subsequently been repaired.

Historic Class Observations are also detailed in Appendix V, and of these, it was noted that in June 2018 numerous tanks
were found with pitting above the permitted levels and required areas to be renewed.

In conclusion, the vessel’s class records indicate full compliance with Class requirements, with no significant adverse
history evident.

2
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

APPENDIX I – Vessel particulars

Vessel name: Example Vessel

IMO number: 123456789

Date of delivery: 01 Jan 2008

Port of registry: Example Port

Flag: Example Flag

Class: Example Class

Owners: Example Owner

Managers: Example Manager

DWT: Example DWT

GT: Example GT

Main engine manufacturer: Example Engine Manufacturer

Model: Example Model

Total power: Example kW

Rated speed: Example Knots

Auxiliary engines maker: Example Aux Engine Manufacturer

Previous names: Example Previous Name

Capacity: Liquid @ 98% 81,707; Segregated Ballast 31,819; Slops

2,297

3
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

APPENDIX II – Survey Status

The vessel is 12 years old. All Class and statutory certificates delegated to Class were found to be in order and current.
The next special survey is due in approximately 12 months.

Survey Yes No Remarks

Is the vessel subject to an Extended Dry

 
Docking (EDD) program?

Is the vessel on an Enhanced Survey Program

 
(ESP)?

Survey Date last completed Date next due

Main/ Special / Renewal 27 Jun 2018 13 Nov 2023

Intermediate Required surveys carried out

Previously

Annual Required surveys carried out 13 Nov 2023

Previously

Bottom in water N/A N/A

Bottom in dry dock 07 May 2021 11 Dec 2023

• The annual surveys have a window of ±3 months, and the intermediate survey window begins from the opening of
the 2nd annual window to the closing of the 3rd annual window.

• No intermediate survey is required in the first survey cycle.

• The special survey must be completed every five years, by the due date, and can be done from the opening of the
4th annual survey window.

• The vessel must dry dock at least two times in any 5-year period, unless the vessel has an In-water survey Class
notation, allowing one of the dockings to be done in-water instead.

4
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

• A vessel may perform an in-water survey in lieu of dry docking without an in-water survey Class notation, but only by
applying to, and gaining express permission from the Classification society.

5
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

APPENDIX III - Class notations

Class notations summarise the various standards applicable to the vessel in terms of cargoes that may be carried, hull
strength, ship type, survey scheme, trades permitted, ability to carry hazardous cargo, machinery restrictions and
limitations as well as a very large number of additional attributes. The notations for this vessel were reviewed and found
to be as expected for a ship of this type, intended trade and era of build.

The vessel has the following Class notations:

Class Notations:
A1, Oil Carrier, ESP, AMS, ACCU
CRC(I), Ice Class IA(13350), NBLES(I), RRDA, TCM, VEC

Meanings:

• A1 - A1 is a classification symbol that, indicates compliance with the Hull requirements of the ABS Rules or their
equivalent for unrestricted ocean service.

• Oil Carrier - This notation is assigned to a vessel that is designed and constructed primarily for the
transportation of petroleum products (crude oil) in bulk, having flash points at or below 60°C (140°F), closed cup
test, and includes vessels of similar types such as combination carriers (Ore/Oil Carriers, etc.).

• ESP - Enhanced Survey Program – This notation is assigned to Oil Carriers, Bulk Carriers, Ore Carriers,
Combination Carriers or Chemical Carriers, all in salt-water service, that are in compliance with the specified
survey requirements for the ESP notation in the ABS Rules for Survey After Construction (Part 7).

• ACCU - Automatic Centralized Control Unmanned (ACCU) – This notation is assigned to a vessel having the
means to control and monitor the propulsion-machinery space from the navigation bridge and from a
centralized control and monitoring station installed within or adjacent to, the propulsion machinery space.

• CRC - Crane Register Certificate – This notation signifies that an ABS Register of Lifting Appliances is issued under
the provisions of the ABS Guide for Certification of Lifting Appliances.

• Ice Class IA(13350) - The ice strengthening notations Ice Class A5, A4, A3, A2, and A1 are optional notations that
indicate that the vessel is suitable for navigating independently in multi-year ice in accordance with the
applicable requirements of Section 6-1-1 of the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels. See 6-1-1/Table
1 for guidance in selecting the most suitable ice class for the operational regions and periods, and ice conditions.

• NBLES(I) - Navigational Bridge Layout and Equipment/Systems (NBLES) – This notation is assigned to vessels
having bridges found to comply with the requirements in Parts A through C of the ABS Guide for Navigational
Bridge Design and Equipment/Systems, as applicable, and which have been constructed and installed under
survey by the Bureau.

• RRDA - Rapid Response Damage Assessment – This notation is assigned to vessels which have been classed in
compliance with the ABS Guide for Rapid Response Damage Assessment.

6
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

• TCM - Tailshaft Condition Monitoring (TCM) – This notation is assigned to vessels with tailshafts specifically
arranged with oil-lubricated stern tube bearings, complying with the requirements of 4-3-2/13 of the ABS Rules
for Building and Classing Steel Vessels.

• VEC - Vapor Emission Control – The notation VEC is assigned to indicate that an oil carrier is fitted with a vapor
emission control system; and that the system is in accordance with the applicable requirements of 5C-1-7/21 of
the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Marine Vessels for this notation.

7
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

APPENDIX IV – ‘Open’ Recommendations of Class

and Class observations

Note - All errors in spelling and grammar (SIC) are intentionally left as-is to preserve originality.

Recommendations
None

Class observations

682.0 Date Issued: 27 Dec 2021

Owners reported that the Incinerator was not operational due to failure of Exhaust fan and requested for temporarily
decommission of the Incinerator. Relevant IAPP and IOPP Supplements removing reference to incinerator were issued
at this time.
Operation of incinerator to be verified to the satisfaction of attending Bureau Surveyor, prior reinstatement of
incinerator.

8
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

APPENDIX V – Historic Recommendations of Class

and Class observations

Note - All errors in spelling and grammar (SIC) are intentionally left as-is to preserve originality.

Recommendations

229 Date Issued: 15 Mar 2018 Date Deleted: 27 Jun 2018

Findings related to malfunctioning freefall lifeboat davit winch and 5 yearly load test and servicing to be
rectified/completed by next port and to be verified to the satisfaction of next attending surveyor.

640 Date Issued: 30 Apr 2019 Date Deleted: 10 May 2019

The Emergency Generator automatic start and automatic connection to the Emergency Switchboard was reported
inoperative due to malfunction of Engine Controller. However the Emergency Generator was confirmed to be ableof
manual starting by both means of starting (on battery and spring loaded) and it could be taken on load by closing
Emergency Switchboard circuit breaker manually.

643 Date Issued: 2 May 2019 Date Deleted: 10 May 2019

The Rescue Boat hydraulic accumulator bladder was reported leaking. However vessel crew temporarily repaired the
leaking bladder and recharged bladder with nitrogen to operating ressure, 210bar. Slewing operation was tested from
inbound position to launching position and was reported working to satisfaction.

653 Date Issued: Date Deleted: 21 Sep 2019

While at Outer anchorage in New York (Ambrose ), vessel found few oily bubbles emanating from vessel aft near ropeller
area at an interval of 5 to 6 minutes. Vessel carried out investigation and suspected leakage from CPP hub area. As per
the attached drawing, vessel suspected that minor oil might be leaking from area of O-ring No.36. At the last Dry dock
and SSH-2 at Dubai in June 2018, the similar repair was performed under maker service engineer Mr. Tassos supervision.
Six (6)layers of steel putty were applied on the hub over the full circumference to cover the O-ring. This method was
recommended by makers as same procedure has been applied on other vessels in similar situation with satisfactory
results.
During a subsequent underwater inspection, divers confirmed an oil leak between metal body of the propeller hub and
old layers of epoxy putty overlay in Dubai. Oil leak so small that it is practically impossible to determine its intensity.

684 Date Issued: 22 Feb 2022 Date Deleted: 3 Mar 2022

It has been reported by Client that vessel crew during routine cargo tank and slop tank inspection on 22nd February 2022
has discovered minor fractures on corrugated bulkheads between COT no.6 P &amp; S and Slop tanks P &amp; S. Vessel
was attended at Rotterdam anchorage for examination and repairs and following has been found. Port side COT no.6
and Slop tank transversal corrugated bulkhead found fractured at top of tripping bracket, installed on lower stool plate at
outboard end, due to bracket hard spot termination to corrugation. Fracture has propagated horizontally to outboard

9
 Vessel: Ref: Issued on:
Example Vessel 000/000 01 Oct 2022

and inboard of bracket with total length of 200 mm to each side. Starboard side COT no.6 and Slop tank transversal
corrugated bulkhead found fractured at top of tripping bracket, installed on lower stool plate at outboard end, due to
bracket hard spot termination to corrugation. Fracture has propagated horizontally to outboard and inboard of bracket
with total length of 80 mm to each side.

Class observations

50 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

GRP ballast piping found loose and leaking at transverse sections in way of pipe connections in ballast tank no. 6 Port, 6
Starboard and 1 Port.

156 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Water Ballast Tank No. 1 – S Pitting above acceptable limit was found in way of of bottom plating below
bellmouth, dimensions approximately 80mm x 150mm.

157 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Water Ballast Tank No. 4 – S Pitting above acceptable limit was found in way of bottom plating bellow
bellmouth, diemnsions approximately 100mm x 100mm.

158 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Water Ballast Tank No. 5 – S Pitting above acceptable limits was found in way of bottom plating below
bellmouth, dimensions approximately 100mm x 100mm.

159 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Water Ballast Tank No. 5 – P Pitting above acceptable limits was found in way of bottom plating below
bellmouth, dimensions approximately 120mm x 100mm.

160 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Cargo Tank No. 6-P Pitting above acceptable limit was found in way of bottom plating bellow belmouth,
dimensions approximately 100mm X 130mm. Lower part of vertical stiffeners on bottom longitudinal no. 14 on frames 54
and 55 found buckled. Bottom longitudinal no. 14 found distorted in way of frame 54 over a length of approximately
500mm.

161 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Water Ballast Tank No. 6 – S Pitting above acceptable limit was found in way of bottom plating bellow
belmouth, dimensions approximately 100mm x 100mm.

162 Date Closed 27 Jun 2018

Compartment/Bilge Water Holding Tank – S The following areas on the side shell plating found pitted above acceptable
limits in way of frame 33, dimension of pitted area approximately 400mm x 400mm in way of frame 32 to 33, dimensions
of pitted area approximately 300mm x 250mm

10