0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

IJRBS21document8 9

Uploaded by

waluyo dosen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

IJRBS21document8 9

Uploaded by

waluyo dosen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Abun et al.

, International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 10(7) (2021), 01-15

Table 4: Counterproductive behavior

C. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB)


1. I complained about unimportant matters at work. 2.53 DA
2. I made problems greater than they were at work. 2.46 DA
3. I focused on the negative aspects of a work situation, instead of on the positive aspects. 2.18 DA
4. I spoke with colleagues about the negative aspects of my work. 2.41 DA
5. I spoke with people from outside the organization about the negative aspects of my work. 2.26 DA
6. I did less than was expected of me. 2.40 DA
7. I managed to get off from a work task easily. 2.31 DA
8. I sometimes did nothing, while I should have been working. 2.27 DA
Composite Mean 2.35 DA
Source: Koopmans, et.al (2012).
As we see the data on the table, it reveals that as a whole, individual performance of employees in terms of counterproductive behavior
obtains a composite mean rating of 2.35 which is described as "disagree/low". This rating recommends that as a whole, the employees'
performance in terms of counterproductive behavior is not very high or high and it is also not moderate or very low but it is low. This
suggests that as a whole the employees’ counterproductive behavior is low. Even if all items are taken separately, they are all rated
within the same level of mean rating with the same description as “disagree/low” It means that the employees disagree they
complained about unimportant matters at work (2.53), made problems greater than they were at work (2.46), focused on the negative
aspects of a work situation, instead of on the positive aspects (2.18), spoke with colleagues about the negative aspects of their work
(2.41), spoke with people from outside the organization about the negative aspects of their work (2.26), did less than was expected
of them (2.40), managed to get off from a work task easily (2.31), and sometimes did nothing, while they should have been working
(2.27).
Table 5: Summary Table

Work Performance

Task Performance 4.06 A

Contextual performance 4.01 A

Counterproductive behavior 2.35 DA

As we see in the summary table, it depicts an explanation that task performance of employees of the Divine Word Colleges in the
Ilocos Region particularly task and contextual performance is not very high and it is also not very low, low, or moderate but it is
high. This suggests that the employees have a high degree of skills and competence to perform their task and have a high degree of
productive behavior or the extra behaviors that are needed to perform their task. This is evidenced by the lower degree of their
counterproductive behavior. Their counterproductive behavior rating is low which indicates that their behaviors are not too harmful
for the organization.

What is the work environment of the Divine Word Colleges in the Ilocos Region in terms of Bureaucratic environment,
Humanistic environment and Working relationship?
Table 6: Work Environment of the Divine Word Colleges in the Ilocos Region

A. Bureaucratic Work Environment Mean DR


1. Employees are always doing the same job and the same way every day. 3.39 A
2. All employees must follow the established rules and procedures. 3.76 A
3. There is little action taken until a supervisor or the higher up approves a decision. 3.69 A
4. Even small matters have to be referred to someone higher up for a final answer. 3.53 A
5. In general, a person who wants to make his/her own decisions would be quickly discouraged. 3.30 SWA
6. Employees are working under close monitoring of their supervisor. 3.59 A
7. One cannot do his/her job in his/her way but he/she has to follow the rules and procedures. 3.60 A
8. Communications, decisions, and proceedings are put in writing for future references. 3.82 A
9. Employees are afraid of violating the rules because it means punishment. 3.71 A
10. Employees are expected to respect the chain of command. 3.81 A
Composite Mean 3.62 A
Source: Abun, et.al (2021).

You might also like